Antimalarial treatment may have a time-dependent effect on lupus survival : Data from a multinational Latin American inception cohort

ABSTRACT: Objective: To evaluate the beneficial effect of antimalarial treatment on lupus survival in a large, multiethnic, international longitudinal inception cohort. Methods: Socioeconomic and demographic characteristics, clinical manifestations, classification criteria, laboratory findings, and...

Full description

Autores:
Ramírez Gómez, Luis Alberto
Iglesias Gamarra, Antonio
Shinjo, Samuel Katsuyuki
Bonfa, Eloísa
Wojdyla, Daniel
Borb, Eduardo
Scherbarth, Hugo Ricardo
Tavares Brenol, João Carlos
Chacón Diaz, Rosa
Neira Quiroga, Oscar Javier
Berbotto, Guillermo
Garcia De La Torre, Ignacio
Acevedo Vásquez, Eduardo Manuel
Massardo Vega, María Loreto
Barile Fabris, Leonor Adriana
Caeiro, Tomás Francisco
Silveira Torre, Luis Humberto
Sato, Emilia Inoue
Buliubasich, Sandra
Alarcón, Graciela
Tipo de recurso:
Article of investigation
Fecha de publicación:
2010
Institución:
Universidad de Antioquia
Repositorio:
Repositorio UdeA
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/25904
Acceso en línea:
http://hdl.handle.net/10495/25904
Palabra clave:
Antimalarials
Antimaláricos
Lupus Vulgaris
Lupus Vulgar
Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
Rights
openAccess
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT: Objective: To evaluate the beneficial effect of antimalarial treatment on lupus survival in a large, multiethnic, international longitudinal inception cohort. Methods: Socioeconomic and demographic characteristics, clinical manifestations, classification criteria, laboratory findings, and treatment variables were examined in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) from the Grupo Latino Americano de Estudio del Lupus Eritematoso (GLADEL) cohort. The diagnosis of SLE, according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria, was assessed within 2 years of cohort entry. Cause of death was classified as active disease, infection, cardiovascular complications, thrombosis, malignancy, or other cause. Patients were subdivided by antimalarial use, grouped according to those who had received antimalarial drugs for at least 6 consecutive months (user) and those who had received antimalarial drugs for <6 consecutive months or who had never received antimalarial drugs (nonuser). Results: Of the 1,480 patients included in the GLADEL cohort, 1,141 (77%) were considered antimalarial users, with a mean duration of drug exposure of 48.5 months (range 6–98 months). Death occurred in 89 patients (6.0%). A lower mortality rate was observed in antimalarial users compared with nonusers (4.4% versus 11.5%; P< 0.001). Seventy patients (6.1%) had received antimalarial drugs for 6–11 months, 146 (12.8%) for 1–2 years, and 925 (81.1%) for >2 years. Mortality rates among users by duration of antimalarial treatment (per 1,000 person-months of followup) were 3.85 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.41–8.37), 2.7 (95% CI 1.41–4.76), and 0.54 (95% CI 0.37–0.77), respectively, while for nonusers, the mortality rate was 3.07 (95% CI 2.18–4.20) (P for trend < 0.001). After adjustment for potential confounders in a Cox regression model, antimalarial use was associated with a 38% reduction in the mortality rate (hazard ratio 0.62, 95% CI 0.39–0.99). Conclusion: Antimalarial drugs were shown to have a protective effect, possibly in a time-dependent manner, on SLE survival. These results suggest that the use of antimalarial treatment should be recommended for patients with lupus.