Sociopolitical categories evaluated in nutrition programs and policies in Latin America

ABSTRACT: The evaluation of nutrition programs and policies has traditionally focused on analysing the impact and biological outcomes of their actions. Objective: To examine whether evaluations of nutrition programs include the following sociopolitical categories: (a) the right to food; (b) citizens...

Full description

Autores:
Álvarez Castaño, Luz Stella
Góez Rueda, Juan Diego
Díaz García, Juliana
Quintero Morales, Maria Teresa
Tipo de recurso:
Article of investigation
Fecha de publicación:
2017
Institución:
Universidad de Antioquia
Repositorio:
Repositorio UdeA
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/9787
Acceso en línea:
http://hdl.handle.net/10495/9787
Palabra clave:
Salud pública
Public health
Nutrition programs
Programas de nutrición
Políticas públicas
Public health
Política de desarrollo
Development policy
Rights
openAccess
License
Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 CO)
id UDEA2_74b4d65bf5a703c73b61a806b9d45cc3
oai_identifier_str oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/9787
network_acronym_str UDEA2
network_name_str Repositorio UdeA
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Sociopolitical categories evaluated in nutrition programs and policies in Latin America
dc.title.alternative.spa.fl_str_mv Categorías sociopolíticas evaluadas en programas y políticas nutricionales en América Latina
title Sociopolitical categories evaluated in nutrition programs and policies in Latin America
spellingShingle Sociopolitical categories evaluated in nutrition programs and policies in Latin America
Salud pública
Public health
Nutrition programs
Programas de nutrición
Políticas públicas
Public health
Política de desarrollo
Development policy
title_short Sociopolitical categories evaluated in nutrition programs and policies in Latin America
title_full Sociopolitical categories evaluated in nutrition programs and policies in Latin America
title_fullStr Sociopolitical categories evaluated in nutrition programs and policies in Latin America
title_full_unstemmed Sociopolitical categories evaluated in nutrition programs and policies in Latin America
title_sort Sociopolitical categories evaluated in nutrition programs and policies in Latin America
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Álvarez Castaño, Luz Stella
Góez Rueda, Juan Diego
Díaz García, Juliana
Quintero Morales, Maria Teresa
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Álvarez Castaño, Luz Stella
Góez Rueda, Juan Diego
Díaz García, Juliana
Quintero Morales, Maria Teresa
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Salud pública
Public health
Nutrition programs
Programas de nutrición
Políticas públicas
Public health
Política de desarrollo
Development policy
topic Salud pública
Public health
Nutrition programs
Programas de nutrición
Políticas públicas
Public health
Política de desarrollo
Development policy
description ABSTRACT: The evaluation of nutrition programs and policies has traditionally focused on analysing the impact and biological outcomes of their actions. Objective: To examine whether evaluations of nutrition programs include the following sociopolitical categories: (a) the right to food; (b) citizenship building; (c) civil participation in public policies; (d) women’s empowerment; and (e) territoriality in policy planning. Methodology: A comprehensive literature review of articles and documents that evaluate food and nutrition programs carried out in different Latin American countries and published during 2005-2013. Results: It was found that the evaluations carried out generally do not use these categories. In the cases where they are used, the conceptual development applied to the evaluation process is still incipient. Discussion: This study analyzed the sociopolitical categories of: the right to food; citizenship building; civil participation in public policies; women’s empowerment; and territoriality in policy planning, and found that although these categories are not prioritised when nutritional programs in Latin America are assessed, in most cases they form the basis of these programs. Conclusion: Social protection nutrition programs demand new objectives and actions. It is necessary to apply evaluation criteria that account for these new underpinnings in order to establish consistency between government institutions’ discourse, and the reality of their efforts.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2017
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2018-07-24T20:41:01Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2018-07-24T20:41:01Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.hasversion.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de investigación
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.spa.fl_str_mv Álvarez-Castaño LS, Goez JD, Díaz J, Quintero MT. Sociopolitical categories evaluated in Nutrition Programs and Policies in Latin America. Rev. Fac. Nac. Salud Pública. 2017; 35(2): 274-283. DOI: 10.17533/udea.rfnsp.v35n2a11
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0120-386X
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10495/9787
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.17533/udea.rfnsp.v35n2a11
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 2256-3334
identifier_str_mv Álvarez-Castaño LS, Goez JD, Díaz J, Quintero MT. Sociopolitical categories evaluated in Nutrition Programs and Policies in Latin America. Rev. Fac. Nac. Salud Pública. 2017; 35(2): 274-283. DOI: 10.17533/udea.rfnsp.v35n2a11
0120-386X
10.17533/udea.rfnsp.v35n2a11
2256-3334
url http://hdl.handle.net/10495/9787
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartofjournalabbrev.spa.fl_str_mv Rev. Fac. Nac. Salud Pública
dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 CO)
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.creativecommons.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 CO)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv 9
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad de Antioquia, Facultad Nacional de Salud Pública
dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv Medellín, Colombia
institution Universidad de Antioquia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/9787/2/license_url
http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/9787/3/license_text
http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/9787/4/license_rdf
http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/9787/5/license.txt
http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/9787/1/AlvarezLuz_2017_SociopoliticalCategoriesEvaluated.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2f
d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e
d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e
8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33
7797b574bdd3b0fd676d47f04265c4ec
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Antioquia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv andres.perez@udea.edu.co
_version_ 1812173083804434432
spelling Álvarez Castaño, Luz StellaGóez Rueda, Juan DiegoDíaz García, JulianaQuintero Morales, Maria Teresa2018-07-24T20:41:01Z2018-07-24T20:41:01Z2017Álvarez-Castaño LS, Goez JD, Díaz J, Quintero MT. Sociopolitical categories evaluated in Nutrition Programs and Policies in Latin America. Rev. Fac. Nac. Salud Pública. 2017; 35(2): 274-283. DOI: 10.17533/udea.rfnsp.v35n2a110120-386Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/10495/978710.17533/udea.rfnsp.v35n2a112256-3334ABSTRACT: The evaluation of nutrition programs and policies has traditionally focused on analysing the impact and biological outcomes of their actions. Objective: To examine whether evaluations of nutrition programs include the following sociopolitical categories: (a) the right to food; (b) citizenship building; (c) civil participation in public policies; (d) women’s empowerment; and (e) territoriality in policy planning. Methodology: A comprehensive literature review of articles and documents that evaluate food and nutrition programs carried out in different Latin American countries and published during 2005-2013. Results: It was found that the evaluations carried out generally do not use these categories. In the cases where they are used, the conceptual development applied to the evaluation process is still incipient. Discussion: This study analyzed the sociopolitical categories of: the right to food; citizenship building; civil participation in public policies; women’s empowerment; and territoriality in policy planning, and found that although these categories are not prioritised when nutritional programs in Latin America are assessed, in most cases they form the basis of these programs. Conclusion: Social protection nutrition programs demand new objectives and actions. It is necessary to apply evaluation criteria that account for these new underpinnings in order to establish consistency between government institutions’ discourse, and the reality of their efforts.RESUMEN: La evaluación de programas y políticas nutricionales se ha enfocado tradicionalmente al análisis del impacto y resultados biológicos de las intervenciones. Objetivo: Examinar si las evaluaciones a programas nutricionales incluyen las siguientes categorías socio-políticas: (a) El derecho a la alimentación, (b) La construcción de ciudadanía, (c) La participación ciudadana en las políticas públicas, (d) El empoderamiento de la mujer y (e) La territorialidad en las políticas de planificación. Metodología: Revisión integrativa de la literatura sobre artículos y documentos de evaluaciones a programas alimentarios y nutricionales en países de América Latina publicados entre 2005 y 2013. Resultados: Se encontró en general que en las evaluaciones no se indaga por estas categorías; en los casos en que se hace su desarrollo conceptual aplicado a los procesos de evaluación es incipiente. Discusión: El principal hallazgo es que las categorías sociopolíticas analizadas no se encuentran entre las prioridades en la evaluación de programas nutricionales en América Latina, aunque en la mayoría de los casos son la base de estos programas. Conclusión: Los programas nutricionales de protección social demandan nuevos objetivos e intervenciones. Es necesario aplicar criterios de evaluación con nuevas bases, con el fin de dar coherencia entre los discursos de las instituciones gubernamentales y sus acciones.9application/pdfengUniversidad de Antioquia, Facultad Nacional de Salud PúblicaMedellín, Colombiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTArtículo de investigaciónhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 CO)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Salud públicaPublic healthNutrition programsProgramas de nutriciónPolíticas públicasPublic healthPolítica de desarrolloDevelopment policySociopolitical categories evaluated in nutrition programs and policies in Latin AmericaCategorías sociopolíticas evaluadas en programas y políticas nutricionales en América LatinaRev. Fac. Nac. Salud PúblicaRevista Facultad Nacional de Salud Pública352CC-LICENSElicense_urllicense_urltext/plain; charset=utf-849http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/9787/2/license_url4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2fMD52license_textlicense_texttext/html; charset=utf-80http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/9787/3/license_textd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD53license_rdflicense_rdfLicenciaapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-80http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/9787/4/license_rdfd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD54LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/9787/5/license.txt8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD55ORIGINALAlvarezLuz_2017_SociopoliticalCategoriesEvaluated.pdfAlvarezLuz_2017_SociopoliticalCategoriesEvaluated.pdfArtículo de investigaciónapplication/pdf439201http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/9787/1/AlvarezLuz_2017_SociopoliticalCategoriesEvaluated.pdf7797b574bdd3b0fd676d47f04265c4ecMD5110495/9787oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/97872021-09-01 12:24:28.099Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Antioquiaandres.perez@udea.edu.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