Sociopolitical categories evaluated in nutrition programs and policies in Latin America
ABSTRACT: The evaluation of nutrition programs and policies has traditionally focused on analysing the impact and biological outcomes of their actions. Objective: To examine whether evaluations of nutrition programs include the following sociopolitical categories: (a) the right to food; (b) citizens...
- Autores:
-
Álvarez Castaño, Luz Stella
Góez Rueda, Juan Diego
Díaz García, Juliana
Quintero Morales, Maria Teresa
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of investigation
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2017
- Institución:
- Universidad de Antioquia
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio UdeA
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/9787
- Acceso en línea:
- http://hdl.handle.net/10495/9787
- Palabra clave:
- Salud pública
Public health
Nutrition programs
Programas de nutrición
Políticas públicas
Public health
Política de desarrollo
Development policy
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 CO)
id |
UDEA2_74b4d65bf5a703c73b61a806b9d45cc3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/9787 |
network_acronym_str |
UDEA2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio UdeA |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Sociopolitical categories evaluated in nutrition programs and policies in Latin America |
dc.title.alternative.spa.fl_str_mv |
Categorías sociopolíticas evaluadas en programas y políticas nutricionales en América Latina |
title |
Sociopolitical categories evaluated in nutrition programs and policies in Latin America |
spellingShingle |
Sociopolitical categories evaluated in nutrition programs and policies in Latin America Salud pública Public health Nutrition programs Programas de nutrición Políticas públicas Public health Política de desarrollo Development policy |
title_short |
Sociopolitical categories evaluated in nutrition programs and policies in Latin America |
title_full |
Sociopolitical categories evaluated in nutrition programs and policies in Latin America |
title_fullStr |
Sociopolitical categories evaluated in nutrition programs and policies in Latin America |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sociopolitical categories evaluated in nutrition programs and policies in Latin America |
title_sort |
Sociopolitical categories evaluated in nutrition programs and policies in Latin America |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Álvarez Castaño, Luz Stella Góez Rueda, Juan Diego Díaz García, Juliana Quintero Morales, Maria Teresa |
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Álvarez Castaño, Luz Stella Góez Rueda, Juan Diego Díaz García, Juliana Quintero Morales, Maria Teresa |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Salud pública Public health Nutrition programs Programas de nutrición Políticas públicas Public health Política de desarrollo Development policy |
topic |
Salud pública Public health Nutrition programs Programas de nutrición Políticas públicas Public health Política de desarrollo Development policy |
description |
ABSTRACT: The evaluation of nutrition programs and policies has traditionally focused on analysing the impact and biological outcomes of their actions. Objective: To examine whether evaluations of nutrition programs include the following sociopolitical categories: (a) the right to food; (b) citizenship building; (c) civil participation in public policies; (d) women’s empowerment; and (e) territoriality in policy planning. Methodology: A comprehensive literature review of articles and documents that evaluate food and nutrition programs carried out in different Latin American countries and published during 2005-2013. Results: It was found that the evaluations carried out generally do not use these categories. In the cases where they are used, the conceptual development applied to the evaluation process is still incipient. Discussion: This study analyzed the sociopolitical categories of: the right to food; citizenship building; civil participation in public policies; women’s empowerment; and territoriality in policy planning, and found that although these categories are not prioritised when nutritional programs in Latin America are assessed, in most cases they form the basis of these programs. Conclusion: Social protection nutrition programs demand new objectives and actions. It is necessary to apply evaluation criteria that account for these new underpinnings in order to establish consistency between government institutions’ discourse, and the reality of their efforts. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2017 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-07-24T20:41:01Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-07-24T20:41:01Z |
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.hasversion.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART |
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de investigación |
format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.spa.fl_str_mv |
Álvarez-Castaño LS, Goez JD, Díaz J, Quintero MT. Sociopolitical categories evaluated in Nutrition Programs and Policies in Latin America. Rev. Fac. Nac. Salud Pública. 2017; 35(2): 274-283. DOI: 10.17533/udea.rfnsp.v35n2a11 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
0120-386X |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10495/9787 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.17533/udea.rfnsp.v35n2a11 |
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv |
2256-3334 |
identifier_str_mv |
Álvarez-Castaño LS, Goez JD, Díaz J, Quintero MT. Sociopolitical categories evaluated in Nutrition Programs and Policies in Latin America. Rev. Fac. Nac. Salud Pública. 2017; 35(2): 274-283. DOI: 10.17533/udea.rfnsp.v35n2a11 0120-386X 10.17533/udea.rfnsp.v35n2a11 2256-3334 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10495/9787 |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartofjournalabbrev.spa.fl_str_mv |
Rev. Fac. Nac. Salud Pública |
dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 CO) |
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/ |
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.creativecommons.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 CO) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv |
9 |
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de Antioquia, Facultad Nacional de Salud Pública |
dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv |
Medellín, Colombia |
institution |
Universidad de Antioquia |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/9787/2/license_url http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/9787/3/license_text http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/9787/4/license_rdf http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/9787/5/license.txt http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/9787/1/AlvarezLuz_2017_SociopoliticalCategoriesEvaluated.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2f d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e 8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33 7797b574bdd3b0fd676d47f04265c4ec |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Antioquia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
andres.perez@udea.edu.co |
_version_ |
1812173083804434432 |
spelling |
Álvarez Castaño, Luz StellaGóez Rueda, Juan DiegoDíaz García, JulianaQuintero Morales, Maria Teresa2018-07-24T20:41:01Z2018-07-24T20:41:01Z2017Álvarez-Castaño LS, Goez JD, Díaz J, Quintero MT. Sociopolitical categories evaluated in Nutrition Programs and Policies in Latin America. Rev. Fac. Nac. Salud Pública. 2017; 35(2): 274-283. DOI: 10.17533/udea.rfnsp.v35n2a110120-386Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/10495/978710.17533/udea.rfnsp.v35n2a112256-3334ABSTRACT: The evaluation of nutrition programs and policies has traditionally focused on analysing the impact and biological outcomes of their actions. Objective: To examine whether evaluations of nutrition programs include the following sociopolitical categories: (a) the right to food; (b) citizenship building; (c) civil participation in public policies; (d) women’s empowerment; and (e) territoriality in policy planning. Methodology: A comprehensive literature review of articles and documents that evaluate food and nutrition programs carried out in different Latin American countries and published during 2005-2013. Results: It was found that the evaluations carried out generally do not use these categories. In the cases where they are used, the conceptual development applied to the evaluation process is still incipient. Discussion: This study analyzed the sociopolitical categories of: the right to food; citizenship building; civil participation in public policies; women’s empowerment; and territoriality in policy planning, and found that although these categories are not prioritised when nutritional programs in Latin America are assessed, in most cases they form the basis of these programs. Conclusion: Social protection nutrition programs demand new objectives and actions. It is necessary to apply evaluation criteria that account for these new underpinnings in order to establish consistency between government institutions’ discourse, and the reality of their efforts.RESUMEN: La evaluación de programas y políticas nutricionales se ha enfocado tradicionalmente al análisis del impacto y resultados biológicos de las intervenciones. Objetivo: Examinar si las evaluaciones a programas nutricionales incluyen las siguientes categorías socio-políticas: (a) El derecho a la alimentación, (b) La construcción de ciudadanía, (c) La participación ciudadana en las políticas públicas, (d) El empoderamiento de la mujer y (e) La territorialidad en las políticas de planificación. Metodología: Revisión integrativa de la literatura sobre artículos y documentos de evaluaciones a programas alimentarios y nutricionales en países de América Latina publicados entre 2005 y 2013. Resultados: Se encontró en general que en las evaluaciones no se indaga por estas categorías; en los casos en que se hace su desarrollo conceptual aplicado a los procesos de evaluación es incipiente. Discusión: El principal hallazgo es que las categorías sociopolíticas analizadas no se encuentran entre las prioridades en la evaluación de programas nutricionales en América Latina, aunque en la mayoría de los casos son la base de estos programas. Conclusión: Los programas nutricionales de protección social demandan nuevos objetivos e intervenciones. Es necesario aplicar criterios de evaluación con nuevas bases, con el fin de dar coherencia entre los discursos de las instituciones gubernamentales y sus acciones.9application/pdfengUniversidad de Antioquia, Facultad Nacional de Salud PúblicaMedellín, Colombiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTArtículo de investigaciónhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 CO)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Salud públicaPublic healthNutrition programsProgramas de nutriciónPolíticas públicasPublic healthPolítica de desarrolloDevelopment policySociopolitical categories evaluated in nutrition programs and policies in Latin AmericaCategorías sociopolíticas evaluadas en programas y políticas nutricionales en América LatinaRev. Fac. Nac. Salud PúblicaRevista Facultad Nacional de Salud Pública352CC-LICENSElicense_urllicense_urltext/plain; charset=utf-849http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/9787/2/license_url4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2fMD52license_textlicense_texttext/html; charset=utf-80http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/9787/3/license_textd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD53license_rdflicense_rdfLicenciaapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-80http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/9787/4/license_rdfd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD54LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/9787/5/license.txt8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD55ORIGINALAlvarezLuz_2017_SociopoliticalCategoriesEvaluated.pdfAlvarezLuz_2017_SociopoliticalCategoriesEvaluated.pdfArtículo de investigaciónapplication/pdf439201http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/9787/1/AlvarezLuz_2017_SociopoliticalCategoriesEvaluated.pdf7797b574bdd3b0fd676d47f04265c4ecMD5110495/9787oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/97872021-09-01 12:24:28.099Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Antioquiaandres.perez@udea.edu.coTk9URTogUExBQ0UgWU9VUiBPV04gTElDRU5TRSBIRVJFClRoaXMgc2FtcGxlIGxpY2Vuc2UgaXMgcHJvdmlkZWQgZm9yIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uYWwgcHVycG9zZXMgb25seS4KCk5PTi1FWENMVVNJVkUgRElTVFJJQlVUSU9OIExJQ0VOU0UKCkJ5IHNpZ25pbmcgYW5kIHN1Ym1pdHRpbmcgdGhpcyBsaWNlbnNlLCB5b3UgKHRoZSBhdXRob3Iocykgb3IgY29weXJpZ2h0Cm93bmVyKSBncmFudHMgdG8gRFNwYWNlIFVuaXZlcnNpdHkgKERTVSkgdGhlIG5vbi1leGNsdXNpdmUgcmlnaHQgdG8gcmVwcm9kdWNlLAp0cmFuc2xhdGUgKGFzIGRlZmluZWQgYmVsb3cpLCBhbmQvb3IgZGlzdHJpYnV0ZSB5b3VyIHN1Ym1pc3Npb24gKGluY2x1ZGluZwp0aGUgYWJzdHJhY3QpIHdvcmxkd2lkZSBpbiBwcmludCBhbmQgZWxlY3Ryb25pYyBmb3JtYXQgYW5kIGluIGFueSBtZWRpdW0sCmluY2x1ZGluZyBidXQgbm90IGxpbWl0ZWQgdG8gYXVkaW8gb3IgdmlkZW8uCgpZb3UgYWdyZWUgdGhhdCBEU1UgbWF5LCB3aXRob3V0IGNoYW5naW5nIHRoZSBjb250ZW50LCB0cmFuc2xhdGUgdGhlCnN1Ym1pc3Npb24gdG8gYW55IG1lZGl1bSBvciBmb3JtYXQgZm9yIHRoZSBwdXJwb3NlIG9mIHByZXNlcnZhdGlvbi4KCllvdSBhbHNvIGFncmVlIHRoYXQgRFNVIG1heSBrZWVwIG1vcmUgdGhhbiBvbmUgY29weSBvZiB0aGlzIHN1Ym1pc3Npb24gZm9yCnB1cnBvc2VzIG9mIHNlY3VyaXR5LCBiYWNrLXVwIGFuZCBwcmVzZXJ2YXRpb24uCgpZb3UgcmVwcmVzZW50IHRoYXQgdGhlIHN1Ym1pc3Npb24gaXMgeW91ciBvcmlnaW5hbCB3b3JrLCBhbmQgdGhhdCB5b3UgaGF2ZQp0aGUgcmlnaHQgdG8gZ3JhbnQgdGhlIHJpZ2h0cyBjb250YWluZWQgaW4gdGhpcyBsaWNlbnNlLiBZb3UgYWxzbyByZXByZXNlbnQKdGhhdCB5b3VyIHN1Ym1pc3Npb24gZG9lcyBub3QsIHRvIHRoZSBiZXN0IG9mIHlvdXIga25vd2xlZGdlLCBpbmZyaW5nZSB1cG9uCmFueW9uZSdzIGNvcHlyaWdodC4KCklmIHRoZSBzdWJtaXNzaW9uIGNvbnRhaW5zIG1hdGVyaWFsIGZvciB3aGljaCB5b3UgZG8gbm90IGhvbGQgY29weXJpZ2h0LAp5b3UgcmVwcmVzZW50IHRoYXQgeW91IGhhdmUgb2J0YWluZWQgdGhlIHVucmVzdHJpY3RlZCBwZXJtaXNzaW9uIG9mIHRoZQpjb3B5cmlnaHQgb3duZXIgdG8gZ3JhbnQgRFNVIHRoZSByaWdodHMgcmVxdWlyZWQgYnkgdGhpcyBsaWNlbnNlLCBhbmQgdGhhdApzdWNoIHRoaXJkLXBhcnR5IG93bmVkIG1hdGVyaWFsIGlzIGNsZWFybHkgaWRlbnRpZmllZCBhbmQgYWNrbm93bGVkZ2VkCndpdGhpbiB0aGUgdGV4dCBvciBjb250ZW50IG9mIHRoZSBzdWJtaXNzaW9uLgoKSUYgVEhFIFNVQk1JU1NJT04gSVMgQkFTRUQgVVBPTiBXT1JLIFRIQVQgSEFTIEJFRU4gU1BPTlNPUkVEIE9SIFNVUFBPUlRFRApCWSBBTiBBR0VOQ1kgT1IgT1JHQU5JWkFUSU9OIE9USEVSIFRIQU4gRFNVLCBZT1UgUkVQUkVTRU5UIFRIQVQgWU9VIEhBVkUKRlVMRklMTEVEIEFOWSBSSUdIVCBPRiBSRVZJRVcgT1IgT1RIRVIgT0JMSUdBVElPTlMgUkVRVUlSRUQgQlkgU1VDSApDT05UUkFDVCBPUiBBR1JFRU1FTlQuCgpEU1Ugd2lsbCBjbGVhcmx5IGlkZW50aWZ5IHlvdXIgbmFtZShzKSBhcyB0aGUgYXV0aG9yKHMpIG9yIG93bmVyKHMpIG9mIHRoZQpzdWJtaXNzaW9uLCBhbmQgd2lsbCBub3QgbWFrZSBhbnkgYWx0ZXJhdGlvbiwgb3RoZXIgdGhhbiBhcyBhbGxvd2VkIGJ5IHRoaXMKbGljZW5zZSwgdG8geW91ciBzdWJtaXNzaW9uLgo= |