Comparison of Multiple Stereoscopic and Monoscopic Digital Image Formats to Film for Diabetic Macular Edema Evaluation

ABSTRACT: Purpose.: To assess agreement between evaluations of monoscopic and stereoscopic digital images versus stereo film photographs in diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods : A 152-eye group of digital monoscopic macular images (seven-field sets and wide-angle mosaics) were compared with digita...

Full description

Autores:
Flórez Arango, José Fernando
Hubbard, Larry D.
Danis, Ronald
Li, Helen K.
Esquivel, Adol
Krupinski, Elizabeth A.
Tipo de recurso:
Article of investigation
Fecha de publicación:
2010
Institución:
Universidad de Antioquia
Repositorio:
Repositorio UdeA
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/32976
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/10495/32976
Palabra clave:
Anciano
Aged
Anciano de 80 o más Años
Aged, 80 and over
Retinopatía Diabética
Diabetic Retinopathy
Edema Macular
Macular Edema
Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
Reproducibility of Results
Retina
Procesamiento de Señales Asistido por Computador
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
Rights
openAccess
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
id UDEA2_550797ea85dc99482a65d587f7030472
oai_identifier_str oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/32976
network_acronym_str UDEA2
network_name_str Repositorio UdeA
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Comparison of Multiple Stereoscopic and Monoscopic Digital Image Formats to Film for Diabetic Macular Edema Evaluation
title Comparison of Multiple Stereoscopic and Monoscopic Digital Image Formats to Film for Diabetic Macular Edema Evaluation
spellingShingle Comparison of Multiple Stereoscopic and Monoscopic Digital Image Formats to Film for Diabetic Macular Edema Evaluation
Anciano
Aged
Anciano de 80 o más Años
Aged, 80 and over
Retinopatía Diabética
Diabetic Retinopathy
Edema Macular
Macular Edema
Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
Reproducibility of Results
Retina
Procesamiento de Señales Asistido por Computador
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
title_short Comparison of Multiple Stereoscopic and Monoscopic Digital Image Formats to Film for Diabetic Macular Edema Evaluation
title_full Comparison of Multiple Stereoscopic and Monoscopic Digital Image Formats to Film for Diabetic Macular Edema Evaluation
title_fullStr Comparison of Multiple Stereoscopic and Monoscopic Digital Image Formats to Film for Diabetic Macular Edema Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Multiple Stereoscopic and Monoscopic Digital Image Formats to Film for Diabetic Macular Edema Evaluation
title_sort Comparison of Multiple Stereoscopic and Monoscopic Digital Image Formats to Film for Diabetic Macular Edema Evaluation
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Flórez Arango, José Fernando
Hubbard, Larry D.
Danis, Ronald
Li, Helen K.
Esquivel, Adol
Krupinski, Elizabeth A.
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Flórez Arango, José Fernando
Hubbard, Larry D.
Danis, Ronald
Li, Helen K.
Esquivel, Adol
Krupinski, Elizabeth A.
dc.subject.decs.none.fl_str_mv Anciano
Aged
Anciano de 80 o más Años
Aged, 80 and over
Retinopatía Diabética
Diabetic Retinopathy
Edema Macular
Macular Edema
Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
Reproducibility of Results
Retina
Procesamiento de Señales Asistido por Computador
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
topic Anciano
Aged
Anciano de 80 o más Años
Aged, 80 and over
Retinopatía Diabética
Diabetic Retinopathy
Edema Macular
Macular Edema
Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
Reproducibility of Results
Retina
Procesamiento de Señales Asistido por Computador
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
description ABSTRACT: Purpose.: To assess agreement between evaluations of monoscopic and stereoscopic digital images versus stereo film photographs in diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods : A 152-eye group of digital monoscopic macular images (seven-field sets and wide-angle mosaics) were compared with digital stereoscopic images (uncompressed and compressed seven-field sets) and stereo 35-mm film photos (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study protocol) for the presence of hard exudates (HE), retinal thickening (RT), clinically significant macular edema (CSME), and RT at the center of the macular (RTCM). Results.: Agreement, according to the κ statistic, was almost perfect in identifying HE and RT between all digital formats and stereo film (HE, κ = 0.81–0.87; RT, κ = 0.87–0.92). Distribution in all digital formats was not significantly different from that in film (Bhapkar test: HE, P = 0.20–0.40; RT, P = 0.06–1.0). CSME and RTCM grading differences were either significant or trended toward significance. The readers detected CSME and RTCM in film images more often than in digital formats. In identifying DME features, agreement between evaluations of monoscopic digital formats and film was similar to that between stereo digital formats and film, and the performance of uncompressed images versus film was similar to that of compressed images versus film. Repeatability between readers was similar in evaluations of film and all digital formats. Repeatability in identifying RTCM was lower than that of other DME components in film and all digital formats. Conclusions.: Stereoscopic digital formats are equivalent to monoscopic for DME evaluation, but digital photography is not as sensitive as film in detecting CSME and RTCM.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2010
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-25T19:44:43Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-25T19:44:43Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.hasversion.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de investigación
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.spa.fl_str_mv Li HK, Hubbard LD, Danis RP, Florez-Arango JF, Esquivel A, Krupinski EA. Comparison of multiple stereoscopic and monoscopic digital image formats to film for diabetic macular edema evaluation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Dec;51(12):6753-61. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5504.
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0146-0404
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10495/32976
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1167/iovs.10-5504
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 1552-5783
identifier_str_mv Li HK, Hubbard LD, Danis RP, Florez-Arango JF, Esquivel A, Krupinski EA. Comparison of multiple stereoscopic and monoscopic digital image formats to film for diabetic macular edema evaluation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Dec;51(12):6753-61. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5504.
0146-0404
10.1167/iovs.10-5504
1552-5783
url https://hdl.handle.net/10495/32976
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartofjournalabbrev.spa.fl_str_mv Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.creativecommons.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv 9
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
dc.publisher.group.spa.fl_str_mv Informed
dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv San Luis, Estados Unidos
institution Universidad de Antioquia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/32976/1/FlorezJose_2010_ComparisonStereoscopicMonoscopic.pdf
https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/32976/2/license_rdf
https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/32976/3/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 3a68b75434fb0f2a6524eb6b3d819ac5
1646d1f6b96dbbbc38035efc9239ac9c
8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Antioquia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv andres.perez@udea.edu.co
_version_ 1812173214116216832
spelling Flórez Arango, José FernandoHubbard, Larry D.Danis, RonaldLi, Helen K.Esquivel, AdolKrupinski, Elizabeth A.2022-12-25T19:44:43Z2022-12-25T19:44:43Z2010Li HK, Hubbard LD, Danis RP, Florez-Arango JF, Esquivel A, Krupinski EA. Comparison of multiple stereoscopic and monoscopic digital image formats to film for diabetic macular edema evaluation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Dec;51(12):6753-61. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5504.0146-0404https://hdl.handle.net/10495/3297610.1167/iovs.10-55041552-5783ABSTRACT: Purpose.: To assess agreement between evaluations of monoscopic and stereoscopic digital images versus stereo film photographs in diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods : A 152-eye group of digital monoscopic macular images (seven-field sets and wide-angle mosaics) were compared with digital stereoscopic images (uncompressed and compressed seven-field sets) and stereo 35-mm film photos (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study protocol) for the presence of hard exudates (HE), retinal thickening (RT), clinically significant macular edema (CSME), and RT at the center of the macular (RTCM). Results.: Agreement, according to the κ statistic, was almost perfect in identifying HE and RT between all digital formats and stereo film (HE, κ = 0.81–0.87; RT, κ = 0.87–0.92). Distribution in all digital formats was not significantly different from that in film (Bhapkar test: HE, P = 0.20–0.40; RT, P = 0.06–1.0). CSME and RTCM grading differences were either significant or trended toward significance. The readers detected CSME and RTCM in film images more often than in digital formats. In identifying DME features, agreement between evaluations of monoscopic digital formats and film was similar to that between stereo digital formats and film, and the performance of uncompressed images versus film was similar to that of compressed images versus film. Repeatability between readers was similar in evaluations of film and all digital formats. Repeatability in identifying RTCM was lower than that of other DME components in film and all digital formats. Conclusions.: Stereoscopic digital formats are equivalent to monoscopic for DME evaluation, but digital photography is not as sensitive as film in detecting CSME and RTCM.COL00362129application/pdfengAssociation for Research in Vision and OphthalmologyInformedSan Luis, Estados Unidosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTArtículo de investigaciónhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Comparison of Multiple Stereoscopic and Monoscopic Digital Image Formats to Film for Diabetic Macular Edema EvaluationAncianoAgedAnciano de 80 o más AñosAged, 80 and overRetinopatía DiabéticaDiabetic RetinopathyEdema MacularMacular EdemaReproducibilidad de los ResultadosReproducibility of ResultsRetinaProcesamiento de Señales Asistido por ComputadorSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedInvest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science675367615112ORIGINALFlorezJose_2010_ComparisonStereoscopicMonoscopic.pdfFlorezJose_2010_ComparisonStereoscopicMonoscopic.pdfArtículo de investigaciónapplication/pdf1166576https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/32976/1/FlorezJose_2010_ComparisonStereoscopicMonoscopic.pdf3a68b75434fb0f2a6524eb6b3d819ac5MD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8927https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/32976/2/license_rdf1646d1f6b96dbbbc38035efc9239ac9cMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/32976/3/license.txt8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD5310495/32976oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/329762022-12-25 15:17:39.382Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Antioquiaandres.perez@udea.edu.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