Comparación de la composición corporal obtenida por bioimpedancia e hidrodensitometría en mujeres de 38 a 60 años de Medellín-Colombia
ABSTRACT: Body composition assessment by bioimpedance is non-invasive, inexpensive and portable. Objective: To assess the validity of bioimpedance to estimate fat mass percentage (%FM) in women. Materials and methods: This is a cross-sectional study with a sample of 50 women, 38 to 60 years old. Hyd...
- Autores:
-
Aristizábal Rivera, Juan Carlos
Olaya Ramírez, Sara M.
Giraldo García, Argenis
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of investigation
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2015
- Institución:
- Universidad de Antioquia
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio UdeA
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/11386
- Acceso en línea:
- http://hdl.handle.net/10495/11386
- Palabra clave:
- Antropometría
Anthropometry
Body composition
Body fat
Composición corporal
Grasa corporal
Hidrodensitometría
Hydrodensitometry
Impedancia eléctrica
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 CO)
| Summary: | ABSTRACT: Body composition assessment by bioimpedance is non-invasive, inexpensive and portable. Objective: To assess the validity of bioimpedance to estimate fat mass percentage (%FM) in women. Materials and methods: This is a cross-sectional study with a sample of 50 women, 38 to 60 years old. Hydrodensitometry with simultaneous measurement of the lung residual volume was used as the reference method. The %FM was assessed by the bioimpedance hand-to-feet technique using the equations of Sun and Kotler. A Tanita body composition scale was used to estimate the %FM with the bioimpedance feet-to-feet technique. Results: The %FM estimated by Sun (34,0±4,8) and Kotler (34,4±6,0) were not different (p>0,05) from the %FM obtained by hydrodensitometry (33,3±5,6). The %FM estimated by Tanita differed from the reference method (30,1±5,8, p=0,000). BIA equations and Tanita showed low agreement with hydrodensitometry: Sun (Bland-Altman: -0,73 CI95%: -9,9; 8,4), Kotler (Bland-Altman: -1,1 CI95%: -10,7; 8,5) and Tanita (Bland-Altman: 3,2 CI95%: -5,8; 12,2). Conclusions: In this specific population of women, hand-to-feet bioimpedance with Sun and Kotler equations accurately estimated the %FM of the whole group, but these equations lacked validity to assess the individual %FM. The Tanita body composition scale lacked validity to assess both; individual and group %FM. |
|---|