Digital vs. Film Fundus Photography for Research Grading of Diabetic Retinopathy Severity

ABSTRACT: Purpose.: To assess agreement between digital and film photography for research classification of diabetic retinopathy severity. Methods.: Digital and film photographs from a 152-eye cohort with a full spectrum of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) severity levels were asse...

Full description

Autores:
Flórez Arango, José Fernando
Li, Helen K.
Hubbard, Larry D.
Danis, Ronald P.
Esquivel, Adol
Krupinski, Elizabeth A.
Ferrier, Nicola J.
Tipo de recurso:
Article of investigation
Fecha de publicación:
2010
Institución:
Universidad de Antioquia
Repositorio:
Repositorio UdeA
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/32977
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/10495/32977
Palabra clave:
Anciano
Aged
Anciano de 80 o más Años
Aged, 80 and over
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Técnicas de Diagnóstico Oftalmológico
Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological
Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
Reproducibility of Results
Procesamiento de Señales Asistido por Computador
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
Severity of Illness Index
Rights
openAccess
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
id UDEA2_1799ce726f2f0ffff353ef641a08a74c
oai_identifier_str oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/32977
network_acronym_str UDEA2
network_name_str Repositorio UdeA
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Digital vs. Film Fundus Photography for Research Grading of Diabetic Retinopathy Severity
title Digital vs. Film Fundus Photography for Research Grading of Diabetic Retinopathy Severity
spellingShingle Digital vs. Film Fundus Photography for Research Grading of Diabetic Retinopathy Severity
Anciano
Aged
Anciano de 80 o más Años
Aged, 80 and over
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Técnicas de Diagnóstico Oftalmológico
Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological
Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
Reproducibility of Results
Procesamiento de Señales Asistido por Computador
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
Severity of Illness Index
title_short Digital vs. Film Fundus Photography for Research Grading of Diabetic Retinopathy Severity
title_full Digital vs. Film Fundus Photography for Research Grading of Diabetic Retinopathy Severity
title_fullStr Digital vs. Film Fundus Photography for Research Grading of Diabetic Retinopathy Severity
title_full_unstemmed Digital vs. Film Fundus Photography for Research Grading of Diabetic Retinopathy Severity
title_sort Digital vs. Film Fundus Photography for Research Grading of Diabetic Retinopathy Severity
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Flórez Arango, José Fernando
Li, Helen K.
Hubbard, Larry D.
Danis, Ronald P.
Esquivel, Adol
Krupinski, Elizabeth A.
Ferrier, Nicola J.
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Flórez Arango, José Fernando
Li, Helen K.
Hubbard, Larry D.
Danis, Ronald P.
Esquivel, Adol
Krupinski, Elizabeth A.
Ferrier, Nicola J.
dc.subject.decs.none.fl_str_mv Anciano
Aged
Anciano de 80 o más Años
Aged, 80 and over
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Técnicas de Diagnóstico Oftalmológico
Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological
Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
Reproducibility of Results
Procesamiento de Señales Asistido por Computador
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
Severity of Illness Index
topic Anciano
Aged
Anciano de 80 o más Años
Aged, 80 and over
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Técnicas de Diagnóstico Oftalmológico
Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological
Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
Reproducibility of Results
Procesamiento de Señales Asistido por Computador
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
Severity of Illness Index
description ABSTRACT: Purpose.: To assess agreement between digital and film photography for research classification of diabetic retinopathy severity. Methods.: Digital and film photographs from a 152-eye cohort with a full spectrum of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) severity levels were assessed for repeatability of grading within each image medium and for agreement on ETDRS discrete severity levels, ascending severity thresholds, and presence or absence of diabetic retinopathy index lesions, between digital and 35-mm slides (film). Digital photographs were color balanced to match film. Results.: There was substantial agreement (κ = 0.61, κw [linear weighted] = 0.87) in classification of ETDRS diabetic retinopathy severity levels between digital images and film. Marginal homogeneity analyses found no significant difference in frequency distributions on the severity scale (P = 0.21, Bhapkar test). The κ results ranged from 0.72 to 0.95 for presence or absence of eight ascending diabetic retinopathy severity thresholds. Repeatability of grading between readers viewing digital images was equal to or better than that obtained with film (pair-wise interreader κ for digital images ranged from 0.47 to 0.57 and for film from 0.43 to 0.57. The κ results for identifying diabetic retinopathy lesions ranged from moderate to almost perfect. Moderate agreement of intraretinal microvascular abnormalities and venous beading between digital images and film accounted for slightly lower concordance for severity thresholds ≥47 and for slightly lower interreader agreement within digital and film images at severity thresholds ≥43 and ≥47. Conclusions.: Under controlled circumstances, digital photography can equal the reliability of 35-mm slides for research classification of ETDRS severity level.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2010
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-25T20:07:27Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-25T20:07:27Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.hasversion.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de investigación
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.spa.fl_str_mv Li HK, Hubbard LD, Danis RP, Esquivel A, Florez-Arango JF, Ferrier NJ, Krupinski EA. Digital versus film Fundus photography for research grading of diabetic retinopathy severity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Nov;51(11):5846-52. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4803.
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0146-0404
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10495/32977
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1167/iovs.09-4803
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 1552-5783
identifier_str_mv Li HK, Hubbard LD, Danis RP, Esquivel A, Florez-Arango JF, Ferrier NJ, Krupinski EA. Digital versus film Fundus photography for research grading of diabetic retinopathy severity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Nov;51(11):5846-52. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4803.
0146-0404
10.1167/iovs.09-4803
1552-5783
url https://hdl.handle.net/10495/32977
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartofjournalabbrev.spa.fl_str_mv Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.creativecommons.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv 7
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
dc.publisher.group.spa.fl_str_mv Informed
dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv San Luis, Estados Unidos
institution Universidad de Antioquia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/32977/1/FlorezJose_2010_DigitalPhotographyRetinopathy.pdf
https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/32977/2/license_rdf
https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/32977/3/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 6942290d7e0bfb60367da4f66b9725ef
1646d1f6b96dbbbc38035efc9239ac9c
8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Antioquia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv andres.perez@udea.edu.co
_version_ 1812173134448558080
spelling Flórez Arango, José FernandoLi, Helen K.Hubbard, Larry D.Danis, Ronald P.Esquivel, AdolKrupinski, Elizabeth A.Ferrier, Nicola J.2022-12-25T20:07:27Z2022-12-25T20:07:27Z2010Li HK, Hubbard LD, Danis RP, Esquivel A, Florez-Arango JF, Ferrier NJ, Krupinski EA. Digital versus film Fundus photography for research grading of diabetic retinopathy severity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Nov;51(11):5846-52. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4803.0146-0404https://hdl.handle.net/10495/3297710.1167/iovs.09-48031552-5783ABSTRACT: Purpose.: To assess agreement between digital and film photography for research classification of diabetic retinopathy severity. Methods.: Digital and film photographs from a 152-eye cohort with a full spectrum of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) severity levels were assessed for repeatability of grading within each image medium and for agreement on ETDRS discrete severity levels, ascending severity thresholds, and presence or absence of diabetic retinopathy index lesions, between digital and 35-mm slides (film). Digital photographs were color balanced to match film. Results.: There was substantial agreement (κ = 0.61, κw [linear weighted] = 0.87) in classification of ETDRS diabetic retinopathy severity levels between digital images and film. Marginal homogeneity analyses found no significant difference in frequency distributions on the severity scale (P = 0.21, Bhapkar test). The κ results ranged from 0.72 to 0.95 for presence or absence of eight ascending diabetic retinopathy severity thresholds. Repeatability of grading between readers viewing digital images was equal to or better than that obtained with film (pair-wise interreader κ for digital images ranged from 0.47 to 0.57 and for film from 0.43 to 0.57. The κ results for identifying diabetic retinopathy lesions ranged from moderate to almost perfect. Moderate agreement of intraretinal microvascular abnormalities and venous beading between digital images and film accounted for slightly lower concordance for severity thresholds ≥47 and for slightly lower interreader agreement within digital and film images at severity thresholds ≥43 and ≥47. Conclusions.: Under controlled circumstances, digital photography can equal the reliability of 35-mm slides for research classification of ETDRS severity level.COL00362127application/pdfengAssociation for Research in Vision and OphthalmologyInformedSan Luis, Estados Unidosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTArtículo de investigaciónhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Digital vs. Film Fundus Photography for Research Grading of Diabetic Retinopathy SeverityAncianoAgedAnciano de 80 o más AñosAged, 80 and overDiabetes Mellitus Tipo 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Técnicas de Diagnóstico OftalmológicoDiagnostic Techniques, OphthalmologicalReproducibilidad de los ResultadosReproducibility of ResultsProcesamiento de Señales Asistido por ComputadorSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedÍndice de Severidad de la EnfermedadSeverity of Illness IndexInvest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science584658525111ORIGINALFlorezJose_2010_DigitalPhotographyRetinopathy.pdfFlorezJose_2010_DigitalPhotographyRetinopathy.pdfArtículo de investigaciónapplication/pdf700896https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/32977/1/FlorezJose_2010_DigitalPhotographyRetinopathy.pdf6942290d7e0bfb60367da4f66b9725efMD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8927https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/32977/2/license_rdf1646d1f6b96dbbbc38035efc9239ac9cMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/32977/3/license.txt8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD5310495/32977oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/329772022-12-25 15:17:24.128Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Antioquiaandres.perez@udea.edu.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