Contaminantes bacterianos y perfil de susceptibilidad del semen porcino en centros de recogida em Brasil

Autores:: E. Bennemann, Paulo
A. Machado, Sergio
K. Girardini, Lilian
Sonálio, Karina
A. Tonin, Alexandre

Tipo de recurso:: Article of journal

Fecha de publicación:: 2018

Institución:: Universidad de Córdoba

Repositorio:: Repositorio Institucional Unicórdoba

Idioma:: spa

id	UCORDOBA2_10ae3a1b26db718bd917894ca1a482ac
oai_identifier_str	oai:repositorio.unicordoba.edu.co:ucordoba/5943
network_acronym_str	UCORDOBA2
network_name_str	Repositorio Institucional Unicórdoba
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	Contaminantes bacterianos y perfil de susceptibilidad del semen porcino en centros de recogida em Brasil
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv	Bacterial Contaminants and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profile of Boar Semen in Southern Brazil Studs
title	Contaminantes bacterianos y perfil de susceptibilidad del semen porcino en centros de recogida em Brasil
spellingShingle	Contaminantes bacterianos y perfil de susceptibilidad del semen porcino en centros de recogida em Brasil Boar semen bacterial contamination antimicrobial susceptibility Semen porcino contaminación bacteriana Susceptibilidad antimicrobiana
title_short	Contaminantes bacterianos y perfil de susceptibilidad del semen porcino en centros de recogida em Brasil
title_full	Contaminantes bacterianos y perfil de susceptibilidad del semen porcino en centros de recogida em Brasil
title_fullStr	Contaminantes bacterianos y perfil de susceptibilidad del semen porcino en centros de recogida em Brasil
title_full_unstemmed	Contaminantes bacterianos y perfil de susceptibilidad del semen porcino en centros de recogida em Brasil
title_sort	Contaminantes bacterianos y perfil de susceptibilidad del semen porcino en centros de recogida em Brasil
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	E. Bennemann, Paulo A. Machado, Sergio K. Girardini, Lilian Sonálio, Karina A. Tonin, Alexandre
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv	E. Bennemann, Paulo A. Machado, Sergio K. Girardini, Lilian Sonálio, Karina A. Tonin, Alexandre
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv	Boar semen bacterial contamination antimicrobial susceptibility
topic	Boar semen bacterial contamination antimicrobial susceptibility Semen porcino contaminación bacteriana Susceptibilidad antimicrobiana
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	Semen porcino contaminación bacteriana Susceptibilidad antimicrobiana
publishDate	2018
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2018-05-01 00:00:00 2022-07-01T21:00:54Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2018-05-01 00:00:00 2022-07-01T21:00:54Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2018-05-01
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv	Journal article
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	0122-0268
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://repositorio.unicordoba.edu.co/handle/ucordoba/5943
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv	10.21897/rmvz.1338
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.1338
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv	1909-0544
identifier_str_mv	0122-0268 10.21897/rmvz.1338 1909-0544
url	https://repositorio.unicordoba.edu.co/handle/ucordoba/5943 https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.1338
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv	Bortolozzo FP, Menegat MB, Mellagi APG, Bernardi ML, Wentz I. New artificial insemination technologies for swine. Reprod Dom Anim. 2015; 50(Suppl. 2):80-84. Riesenbeck A. Review on international trade with boar semen. Rep Domestic Anim. 2011; 46(Suppl. 2):1-3. Morrell JM. Antimicrobials in boar semen extenders – A risk / Benefits analysis. J Antimicrob. 2016; 2(1):107-108. Althouse GC. Sanitary Procedures for the Production of Extended Semen. Reprod Dom Anim. 2008; 43:374-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01187.x Althouse GC, Pierdon MS, Lu KG. Thermotemporal dynamics of contaminant bacteria and antimicrobials in extended porcine semen. Theriogenol. 2008; 70:1317-1323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.07.010 Bussalleu E, Yeste M, Sepúlveda L, Torner E, Pinart E, et al. Effects of different concentrations of enterotoxigenic and verotoxigenic E. coli on boar sperm quality. Anim Reprod Sci. 2011; 127: 176-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2011.07.018 Schultze M, Ammon C, Rudiger K, Jung M, Grobbel M. Analysis of hygienic critical points in boar semen production. Theriogenology. 2015; 83:430-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.10.004 Schulze M, Grobbel M, Muller KM, Junkes C, Dathe M, Rudiger KR, Jung M. Challenges and limits using antimicrobial peptides in boar semen preservation. Reprod Dom Anim. 2015; 50(Suppl 2):5-10. Grossfeld R, Peralta W, Weitze K, Waberski D. Antibiotic-free hypothermic storage of boar semen in Androstar +5 extender results in similar fertility results compared to semen stored at 17°C in extender with antibiotic content. Anim Reprod Sci. 2016; 169:125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2016.03.071 Schulze M, Ammon C, Rüdiger K, Kung M, Grobblel M. Analysis of hygienic critical control points in boar semen production. Theriogenol. 2015; 83(3):430-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.10.004 Gaczarzewicz D, Udala J, Piasecka M, Blaszczyk B, Stankiewicz T. Bacterial contamination of boar semen and its relationship to sperm quality preserved in commercial extender containing gentamicin sulfate. Polish J Vet Sci. 2016; 19(3):451–459. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjvs-2016-0057 Markey B, Leonard F, Archambault M, Cullinane A, Maguire D. Clinical Veterinary Microbiology, 2013; 2 ed. MOSBY Elsevier, p. 27-49; 920 pp. CLSI. Developtment of In Vitro Susceptibility Testing Criteria and Quality Control Parameters. 5th Ed. CLSI guideline 23. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2018. Althouse GC. Sanitary procedures for the production of extended semen. Reprod Dom Anim. 2008; 43:374-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01187.x Rodriguez AL, Soom AV, Arsenakis I, Maes D. Boar management and semen handling factors affect the quality of boar extended semen. Porcine Health Management. 2017; 3:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-017-0062-5 Payne BJ, Clark S, Maddox C, Ness A. Achromobacter xylosoxidans in extended semen causes reproductive failure in artificially inseminated sows and gilts. J Swine Health Prod. 2008; 16(6):316-322. Gary E Ritchie. Water for Pharmaceutical Purposes USP 24/NF. 2000; 30(5):1744. URL available in: http://www.pharmacopeia.cn/v29240/usp29nf24s0_c1231.html Bresciani C, Cabassi CS, Morini G, Taddei S, Bigliardi E, Di Lanni F, Sabboni A, Parmigiani E. Boar semen bacterial contamination in Italy and antibiotic efficacy in a modified extender. Ital J Anim Sci. 2014; 13:3082. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2014.3082 Tremblay YDN, Hathroubi S, Jacques M. Les biofilms bactériens: leur importance en santé animale et en santé publique. Canadian J Vet Res. 2014; 78(2): 110-116. Fuster-Valls N, Hernández-Herrero M, Marín-de-Mateo M, Rodríguez-Jerez JJ. Effect of different environmental conditions on the bacteria survival on stainless steel surfaces. Food Cont. 2008; 19:308-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2007.04.013 Rode TM, Langsrud S, Holck A, Moretro T. Different patterns of biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus under food-related stress conditions. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007; 116:372-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.02.017 De Souza EL, Meira QG, Barbosa IM, Athayde AJAA, Conceição ML, Siqueira-Junior JP. Biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus from food contact surfaces in a meat-based broth and sensitivity to sanitizers. Braz J Microbiol. 2014; 45(1):67-75. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822014000100010 Úbeda JL, Ausejo R, Dahmani Y, Falceto MV, Usan A, Malo C, Perez-Martinez FC. Adverse effects of members of the Enterobacteriaceae family on boar sperm quality. Theriogenol. 2013; 80:565-570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.05.022 Mazurova J, Kukla R, Rozkot M, Lustykova A, Slehova E, Sleha R, Lipensky J, Opletal L. Use of natural substances for boar semen decontamination. Vet Med. 2015; 60:235–247. https://doi.org/10.17221/8175-VETMED Korpimäki T, Kurittu J, Karp M. Surprisingly fast disappearance of β-lactam selection pressure in cultivation as detected with novel biosensing approaches. J Microbiol Met. 2003; 53(1):37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(02)00213-0 Goldberg AMG, Argenti LE, Faccin JE, Linck L, Santi M, Bernardi ML, Cardoso, MRI; Wentz, I; Bortolozzo, FP. Risk factors for bacterial contamination during boar semen collection. Res Vet Sci. 2013; 95:362–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2013.06.022 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), Performance Standard for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; TwentyFourty Informational Supplement. CLSI document M100-S24. Wayne, PA, USA; 2014.
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/1338/pdf https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/1338/epub https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/1338/html https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/1338/2493
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv	Núm. 2 , Año 2018 : Revista MVZ Córdoba Volumen 23(2) Mayo-Agosto 2018
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv	6648
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv	2
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv	6637
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv	23
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv	Revista MVZ Córdoba
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv	application/pdf application/epub+zip text/html application/xml
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad de Córdoba
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv	https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/1338
institution	Universidad de Córdoba
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	http://172.16.14.198/bitstreams/8a21fe61-ff5e-4c83-b861-111287b28c5e/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	7e98b2151c8db5fc461897e1437f7547
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Universidad de Córdoba
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_	1812173342418927616
spelling	E. Bennemann, Paulo1473f519-93c5-4d36-a163-2d915e16922c-1A. Machado, Sergio468079a0-78da-483c-ae1e-7d290bcabc32-1K. Girardini, Lilian304019e4-2742-48e6-b890-b333b81dd62d-1Sonálio, Karinad32ea604-6092-418e-b4f4-8069d5abfc3a-1A. Tonin, Alexandre8642483f-e1ce-498c-95e2-99bbad064ba9-12018-05-01 00:00:002022-07-01T21:00:54Z2018-05-01 00:00:002022-07-01T21:00:54Z2018-05-010122-0268https://repositorio.unicordoba.edu.co/handle/ucordoba/594310.21897/rmvz.1338https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.13381909-0544application/pdfapplication/epub+ziptext/htmlapplication/xmlspaUniversidad de Córdobahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/1338Boar semenbacterial contaminationantimicrobial susceptibilitySemen porcinocontaminación bacterianaSusceptibilidad antimicrobianaContaminantes bacterianos y perfil de susceptibilidad del semen porcino en centros de recogida em BrasilBacterial Contaminants and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profile of Boar Semen in Southern Brazil StudsArtículo de revistaJournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTexthttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Bortolozzo FP, Menegat MB, Mellagi APG, Bernardi ML, Wentz I. New artificial insemination technologies for swine. Reprod Dom Anim. 2015; 50(Suppl. 2):80-84.Riesenbeck A. Review on international trade with boar semen. Rep Domestic Anim. 2011; 46(Suppl. 2):1-3.Morrell JM. Antimicrobials in boar semen extenders – A risk / Benefits analysis. J Antimicrob. 2016; 2(1):107-108.Althouse GC. Sanitary Procedures for the Production of Extended Semen. Reprod Dom Anim. 2008; 43:374-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01187.xAlthouse GC, Pierdon MS, Lu KG. Thermotemporal dynamics of contaminant bacteria and antimicrobials in extended porcine semen. Theriogenol. 2008; 70:1317-1323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.07.010Bussalleu E, Yeste M, Sepúlveda L, Torner E, Pinart E, et al. Effects of different concentrations of enterotoxigenic and verotoxigenic E. coli on boar sperm quality. Anim Reprod Sci. 2011; 127: 176-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2011.07.018Schultze M, Ammon C, Rudiger K, Jung M, Grobbel M. Analysis of hygienic critical points in boar semen production. Theriogenology. 2015; 83:430-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.10.004Schulze M, Grobbel M, Muller KM, Junkes C, Dathe M, Rudiger KR, Jung M. Challenges and limits using antimicrobial peptides in boar semen preservation. Reprod Dom Anim. 2015; 50(Suppl 2):5-10.Grossfeld R, Peralta W, Weitze K, Waberski D. Antibiotic-free hypothermic storage of boar semen in Androstar +5 extender results in similar fertility results compared to semen stored at 17°C in extender with antibiotic content. Anim Reprod Sci. 2016; 169:125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2016.03.071Schulze M, Ammon C, Rüdiger K, Kung M, Grobblel M. Analysis of hygienic critical control points in boar semen production. Theriogenol. 2015; 83(3):430-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.10.004Gaczarzewicz D, Udala J, Piasecka M, Blaszczyk B, Stankiewicz T. Bacterial contamination of boar semen and its relationship to sperm quality preserved in commercial extender containing gentamicin sulfate. Polish J Vet Sci. 2016; 19(3):451–459. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjvs-2016-0057Markey B, Leonard F, Archambault M, Cullinane A, Maguire D. Clinical Veterinary Microbiology, 2013; 2 ed. MOSBY Elsevier, p. 27-49; 920 pp.CLSI. Developtment of In Vitro Susceptibility Testing Criteria and Quality Control Parameters. 5th Ed. CLSI guideline 23. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2018.Althouse GC. Sanitary procedures for the production of extended semen. Reprod Dom Anim. 2008; 43:374-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01187.xRodriguez AL, Soom AV, Arsenakis I, Maes D. Boar management and semen handling factors affect the quality of boar extended semen. Porcine Health Management. 2017; 3:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-017-0062-5Payne BJ, Clark S, Maddox C, Ness A. Achromobacter xylosoxidans in extended semen causes reproductive failure in artificially inseminated sows and gilts. J Swine Health Prod. 2008; 16(6):316-322.Gary E Ritchie. Water for Pharmaceutical Purposes USP 24/NF. 2000; 30(5):1744. URL available in: http://www.pharmacopeia.cn/v29240/usp29nf24s0_c1231.htmlBresciani C, Cabassi CS, Morini G, Taddei S, Bigliardi E, Di Lanni F, Sabboni A, Parmigiani E. Boar semen bacterial contamination in Italy and antibiotic efficacy in a modified extender. Ital J Anim Sci. 2014; 13:3082. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2014.3082Tremblay YDN, Hathroubi S, Jacques M. Les biofilms bactériens: leur importance en santé animale et en santé publique. Canadian J Vet Res. 2014; 78(2): 110-116.Fuster-Valls N, Hernández-Herrero M, Marín-de-Mateo M, Rodríguez-Jerez JJ. Effect of different environmental conditions on the bacteria survival on stainless steel surfaces. Food Cont. 2008; 19:308-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2007.04.013Rode TM, Langsrud S, Holck A, Moretro T. Different patterns of biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus under food-related stress conditions. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007; 116:372-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.02.017De Souza EL, Meira QG, Barbosa IM, Athayde AJAA, Conceição ML, Siqueira-Junior JP. Biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus from food contact surfaces in a meat-based broth and sensitivity to sanitizers. Braz J Microbiol. 2014; 45(1):67-75. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822014000100010Úbeda JL, Ausejo R, Dahmani Y, Falceto MV, Usan A, Malo C, Perez-Martinez FC. Adverse effects of members of the Enterobacteriaceae family on boar sperm quality. Theriogenol. 2013; 80:565-570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.05.022Mazurova J, Kukla R, Rozkot M, Lustykova A, Slehova E, Sleha R, Lipensky J, Opletal L. Use of natural substances for boar semen decontamination. Vet Med. 2015; 60:235–247. https://doi.org/10.17221/8175-VETMEDKorpimäki T, Kurittu J, Karp M. Surprisingly fast disappearance of β-lactam selection pressure in cultivation as detected with novel biosensing approaches. J Microbiol Met. 2003; 53(1):37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(02)00213-0Goldberg AMG, Argenti LE, Faccin JE, Linck L, Santi M, Bernardi ML, Cardoso, MRI; Wentz, I; Bortolozzo, FP. Risk factors for bacterial contamination during boar semen collection. Res Vet Sci. 2013; 95:362–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2013.06.022Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), Performance Standard for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; TwentyFourty Informational Supplement. CLSI document M100-S24. Wayne, PA, USA; 2014.https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/1338/pdfhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/1338/epubhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/1338/htmlhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/1338/2493Núm. 2 , Año 2018 : Revista MVZ Córdoba Volumen 23(2) Mayo-Agosto 201866482663723Revista MVZ CórdobaPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2764http://172.16.14.198/bitstreams/8a21fe61-ff5e-4c83-b861-111287b28c5e/download7e98b2151c8db5fc461897e1437f7547MD51ucordoba/5943oai:172.16.14.198:ucordoba/59432023-10-06 00:45:18.337https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/metadata.onlyhttp://172.16.14.198Repositorio Universidad de Córdobabdigital@metabiblioteca.com

Contaminantes bacterianos y perfil de susceptibilidad del semen porcino en centros de recogida em Brasil

Publicaciones similares