Creencias sobre la violencia y sus efectos en la prevalencia de la violencia en el noviazgo

La violencia en el noviazgo es un fenómeno multifactorial que requiere de estudios que profundicen respecto a los efectos que tienen las creencias culturales en el comportamiento tanto del agresor como de la víctima. Teniendo esto en cuenta, el objetivo de la presente investigación fue determinar la...

Full description

Autores:
Orozco-Vargas, Arturo Enrique
Mercado-Monjardín, María del Rocío
García-López, Georgina Isabel
Venebra-Muñoz, Arturo
Aguilera-Reyes, Ulises
Tipo de recurso:
Article of investigation
Fecha de publicación:
2021
Institución:
Universidad Católica de Colombia
Repositorio:
RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/28482
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/10983/28482
https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2021.24.1.14
Palabra clave:
Dating violence
Beliefs
Justification of violence
Support for the victim
Punishment of the perpetrator
Violencia en el noviazgo
Creencias
Justificación de la violencia
Apoyo a la víctima
Castigo al perpetrador
Rights
openAccess
License
Acta Colombiana de Psicología - 2021
id UCATOLICA2_eaf1526ea5020dc0716c45b0921df7c5
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/28482
network_acronym_str UCATOLICA2
network_name_str RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Creencias sobre la violencia y sus efectos en la prevalencia de la violencia en el noviazgo
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv Beliefs about violence and its effects on the prevalence of dating violence
title Creencias sobre la violencia y sus efectos en la prevalencia de la violencia en el noviazgo
spellingShingle Creencias sobre la violencia y sus efectos en la prevalencia de la violencia en el noviazgo
Dating violence
Beliefs
Justification of violence
Support for the victim
Punishment of the perpetrator
Violencia en el noviazgo
Creencias
Justificación de la violencia
Apoyo a la víctima
Castigo al perpetrador
title_short Creencias sobre la violencia y sus efectos en la prevalencia de la violencia en el noviazgo
title_full Creencias sobre la violencia y sus efectos en la prevalencia de la violencia en el noviazgo
title_fullStr Creencias sobre la violencia y sus efectos en la prevalencia de la violencia en el noviazgo
title_full_unstemmed Creencias sobre la violencia y sus efectos en la prevalencia de la violencia en el noviazgo
title_sort Creencias sobre la violencia y sus efectos en la prevalencia de la violencia en el noviazgo
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Orozco-Vargas, Arturo Enrique
Mercado-Monjardín, María del Rocío
García-López, Georgina Isabel
Venebra-Muñoz, Arturo
Aguilera-Reyes, Ulises
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Orozco-Vargas, Arturo Enrique
Mercado-Monjardín, María del Rocío
García-López, Georgina Isabel
Venebra-Muñoz, Arturo
Aguilera-Reyes, Ulises
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Dating violence
Beliefs
Justification of violence
Support for the victim
Punishment of the perpetrator
topic Dating violence
Beliefs
Justification of violence
Support for the victim
Punishment of the perpetrator
Violencia en el noviazgo
Creencias
Justificación de la violencia
Apoyo a la víctima
Castigo al perpetrador
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv Violencia en el noviazgo
Creencias
Justificación de la violencia
Apoyo a la víctima
Castigo al perpetrador
description La violencia en el noviazgo es un fenómeno multifactorial que requiere de estudios que profundicen respecto a los efectos que tienen las creencias culturales en el comportamiento tanto del agresor como de la víctima. Teniendo esto en cuenta, el objetivo de la presente investigación fue determinar la relación entre las creencias acerca de la violencia y la prevalencia de la violencia en el noviazgo. Para ello, se contó con una muestra de 420 estudiantes de dos universidades públicas mexicanas que respondieron el Inventario de creencias acerca de la violencia hacia la esposa, el Inventario de conflictos en las relaciones de noviazgo, y un cuestionario de información sociodemográfica. Los datos recolectados fueron examinados por medio de un análisis de correlación canónica, y los resultados mostraron que el modelo en general fue estadísticamente significativo (Wilks λ = .654, F (20, 677.54) = 4.626, p < .05); que el tamaño del efecto del modelo general fue de .346, lo que indica que este explicó el 34.6 % de la varianza compartida por los dos conjuntos de variables; y que, específicamente en la primera función, el coeficiente de mayor magnitud fue el de la variable de justificación de la violencia (r2 s= 76.2; h2 = 90.0), seguido por la del apoyo que se le puede brindar a la víctima (r2 s = 57.1; h2 = 94.5).
publishDate 2021
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2021-02-17 20:36:30
2023-01-23T15:43:32Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2021-02-17 20:36:30
2023-01-23T15:43:32Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2021-02-17
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv Journal article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.14718/ACP.2021.24.1.14
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 1909-9711
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0123-9155
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10983/28482
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2021.24.1.14
identifier_str_mv 10.14718/ACP.2021.24.1.14
1909-9711
0123-9155
url https://hdl.handle.net/10983/28482
https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2021.24.1.14
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/2799/3755
https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/2799/3618
https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/2799/3770
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv Núm. 1 , Año 2021 : Volumen 24, número 1.
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv 166
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv 1
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv 154
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv 24
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv Acta Colombiana de Psicología
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv Abrams, D., Viki, G. T., Masser, B., & Bohner, G. (2003). Perception of a stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 111-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.111
Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. En W. M. Kurtines y J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development: Theory, research and applications (pp. 71-129).
Erlbaum. Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364-374. http://dx.doi. org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364
Bybee, D. I., & Sullivan, C. M. (2002). The process through which an advocacy intervention resulted in positive change for battered women over time. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(1), 103-132. http://dx.doi. org/10.1023/A:1014376202459
Calvete, E., & Cardeñoso, O. (2005). Gender differences in cognitive vulnerability to depression and behavior problems in adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 179-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10802-005-1826-y
Cauffman, E., Feldman, S. S., Arnett, L. J., & Jensen, J. A. (2000). The (un)acceptability of violence against peers and dates. Journal of Adolescent Research, 15(6), 652-673. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0743558400156003
Cava, M. J., Martínez-Ferrer, B., Buelga, S., & Carrascosa, L. (2020). Sexist attitudes, romantic myths, and offline dating violence as predictors of cyber dating violence perpetration in adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 111, 106449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106449
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5. ª ed.). Sage publications.
Darteh, E. K. M., Dickson, K. S., Rominski, S. D., & Moyer, C. A. (2020). Justification of physical intimate partner violence among men in sub-Saharan Africa: a multinational analysis of demographic and health survey data. Journal of Public Health, 33, 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s10389-020-01260-9
Díaz-Aguado, M. J. (2003). Adolescencia, sexismo y violencia de género. Papeles del Psicólogo, 23(84), 35-44. http:// www.papelesdelpsicologo.es/resumen?pii=1053
Díaz-Aguado, M. J., & Martínez, A. (2001). La construcción de la igualdad y la prevención de la violencia contra la mujer desde la educación secundaria. Instituto de la mujer.
Durán, M., Moya, M., Megías, J. L., & Viki, G. T. (2010). Social perception of rape victims in dating and married relationships: the role of perpetrator’s benevolent sexism. Sex Roles, 62, 505-519. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s11199-009-9676-7
Fernández-Antelo, I., Cuadrado-Gordillo, I., & Martín-Mora, G. (2020). Synergy between acceptance of violence and sexist attitudes as a dating violence risk factor. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(14), 5209. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145209
Fernández-Fuertes, A. A., Fuertes, A., & Pulido, R. F. (2006). Evaluación de la violencia en las relaciones de pareja de los adolescentes. Validación del Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI) - versión española. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 6(2), 339-358. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?co digo=1983727&orden=65963&info=link
Ferrer-Pérez, V. A., Bosch-Fiol, E., Ramis-Palmer, M. C., & Navarro-Guzmán, C. (2006). Las creencias y actitudes sobre la violencia contra las mujeres en la pareja: Determinantes sociodemográficos, familiares y formativos. Anales de psicología, 22(2), 251-259. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo. oa?id=16722210
Fish, L. (1988). Why multivariate methods are usually vital. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 21(3), 130-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07 481756.1988.12022895
Forbes, G. B., Jobe, R. L., White, K. B., Bloesch, E., & AdamsCurtis, L. E. (2005). Perceptions of dating violence following a sexual or nonsexual betrayal of trust: effects of gender, sexism, acceptance of rape myths, and vengeance motivation. Sex Roles, 52(3-4), 165-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11199-005-1292-6
Foshee, V. A., Bauman, K. E., & Linder, G. F. (1999). Family violence and the perpetration of adolescent dating violence: Examining social learning and social control processes. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(2), 331-342. http:// dx.doi.org/10.2307/353752
Furinghetti, F., & Pehkonen, E. (2002). Rethinking characterizations of beliefs. En G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen y G. Törner (Eds.). Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 39-57). Kluwer Academic Publishers
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491- 512. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
Goodman, L., Dutton, M. A., Vankos, N., & Weinfurt, K. (2005). Women’s resources and use of strategies as risk and protective factors for reabuse over time. Violence Against Women, 11(3), 311-336. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/1077801204273297
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1984). Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice Hall.
Haj-Yahia, M., & Uysal, A. (2008). Beliefs about wife beating among medical students from Turkey. Journal of Family Violence, 23, 119-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s10896-007-9134-7
Hargreaves, S., L. Vetten, V. Schneider, L. Malepe, L., & Fuller, R. (2006). Marriage is like sitting on red coals: A case study of domestic violence in four villages of the Moretele District, Tshwane metropole. Center for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation.
Hunnicutt, G. (2009). Varieties of patriarchy and violence against women: Resurrecting “patriarchy” as a theoretical tool. Violence Against Women, 15(5), 553-573. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077801208331246
Instituto Mexicano de la Juventud. (2008). Encuesta nacional de violencia en las relaciones de noviazgo 2007. INEGI.
Lameiras, M., & Rodríguez, Y. (2002). Evaluación del sexismo moderno en los adolescentes. Revista de Psicología Social, 17(2), 119-127. https://doi. org/10.1174/021347402320007555
Lewis, S. F., & Fremouw, W. (2001). Dating violence: A critical review of the literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 21(1), 105-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(99)00042-2
Mahlstedt, D. L., & Welsh, L. A. (2005). Perceived causes of physical assault in heterosexual dating relationships. Violence Against Women, 11(4), 447-472. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/1077801204273298
Moya, M., Glick, P., Expósito, F., De Lemus, S., & Hart, J. (2007). It’s for your own good: Benevolent Sexism and women’s reactions to protectively justified restrictions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(10), 1421- 1434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167207304790
Orozco, A. E., Nievar, M. A., & Middlemiss, W. (2012). Domestic violence in Mexico: Perspectives of Mexican Counselors. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 43(5), 751-772. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.43.5.751
Reitzel-Jaffe, D., & Wolfe, D. A. (2001). Predictors of relationship abuse among young men. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16(2), 99-115. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/088626001016002001
Rey-Anacona, C. A. (2013). Prevalencia y tipos de maltrato en el noviazgo en adolescentes y adultos jóvenes. Terapia Psicológica, 31(2), 143-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/ S0718-48082013000200001
Rivera, L., Allen, B., Rodríguez, G., Chávez, R., & Lazcano, E. (2007). Prevalence and correlates of adolescent dating violence: Baseline study of a cohort of 7960 male and female Mexican public school students. Preventive Medicine, 44(6), 477-484. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.02.020
Russo, N. F., & Pirlott, A. (2006). Gender-based violence concepts, methods, and findings. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1087(1), 178-205. https://doi. org/10.1196/annals.1385.024
Sakalli-Ugurlu, N., Glick, P., & Yalcin, Z. S. (2007). Ambivalent sexism, Belief in a Just World, and empathy as predictors of Turkish students’ attitudes toward rape victims. Sex Roles, 57, 889-895. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9313-2
Saunders, D. G., Lynch, A. B., Grayson, M., & Linz, D. (1987). The Inventory of Beliefs about Wife Beating: The construction and initial validation of a measure of beliefs and attitudes. Violence and Victims, 2(1), 39-57. https://doi. org/10.1891/0886-6708.2.1.39
Shen, A. C.-T., Chiu, M. Y.-L., & Gao, J. (2012). Predictors of dating violence among Chinese adolescents: The role of gender-role beliefs and justification of violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(6), 1066-1089. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/0886260511424497
Sherry, A., & Henson, R. K. (2005) Conducting and interpreting canonical correlation analysis in personality research: A user-friendly primer. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84(1), 37-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/ s15327752jpa8401_09
Sugarman, D. B., & Frankel, S. L. (1996). Patriarchal ideology and wife-assault: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Family Violence, 11, 13-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02333338
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics (6. ª ed.). Person Education.
Tang, C. S. K., Wong, D., & Cheung, F. M. C. (2002). Social construction of women as legitimate victims of violence in Chinese societies. Violence Against Women, 8(8), 968-996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107780102400447096
Temurtas, A. (2016). Canonical correlation analysis. En C. O. Guzeller (Ed.). Multivariate statistics for all (pp.101-112). Maya Academy Publication.
Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. En D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 127- 146). Macmillan Publishing Co, Inc.
Thompson, B. (1984). Canonical correlation analysis: Uses and interpretation. Sage.
Thompson, B. (1991). A primer on the logic and use of canonical correlation analysis. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 24(2), 80-95. https://psycnet. apa.org/record/1991-32137-001
Tonsing, J. C., & Tonsing, K. N. (2019). Understanding the role of patriarchal ideology in intimate partner violence among South Asian women in Hong Kong. International Social Work, 62(1), 161-171. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/0020872817712566
Waltermaurer, E. (2012). Public justification of intimate partner violence: A review of the literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 13(3), 167-175. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/1524838012447699
Wolfe, D. A., Scott, K., Reitzel-Jaffe, D., Wekerle, C., Grasley, C., & Pittman, A. L. (2001). Development and validation of the conflict in adolescent dating relationships inventory. Psychological Assessment, 13(2), 277-293. http://dx.doi. org/10.1037/1040-3590.13.2.277
Zink, T., Regan, S., Jacobson, C. J., & Pabst, S. (2003). Cohort, period, and aging effects: A qualitative study of older women’s reasons for remaining in abusive relationships. Violence Against Women, 9(12), 1429-1441. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/1077801203259231
Žukauskienė, R., Kaniušonytė, G., Bergman, L. R., Bakaitytė, A., & Truskauskaitė-Kunevičienė, I. (2019). The role of social support in identity processes and posttraumatic growth: A study of victims of intimate partner violence. Journal of interpersonal violence. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/0886260519836785
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv Acta Colombiana de Psicología - 2021
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv Acta Colombiana de Psicología - 2021
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv text/html
application/pdf
text/xml
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Católica de Colombia
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/2799
institution Universidad Católica de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/96247227-c2ec-49e1-8ac9-7023fa9ff76b/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv c9bc6cf42a9c192f5fd1bb8491054064
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_ 1812183392583680000
spelling Orozco-Vargas, Arturo Enrique6714ee7c-ba34-4253-946b-a4881c099760Mercado-Monjardín, María del Rocío879b6a16-fd07-4bb3-9a0d-77e19be2738cGarcía-López, Georgina Isabelee523875-0af8-4632-8909-cbab46c58165Venebra-Muñoz, Arturof5ed3ff5-deec-491b-96f0-049f826fc88fAguilera-Reyes, Ulisesad5d7faa-487d-4fbc-8970-68bc6cee9b872021-02-17 20:36:302023-01-23T15:43:32Z2021-02-17 20:36:302023-01-23T15:43:32Z2021-02-17La violencia en el noviazgo es un fenómeno multifactorial que requiere de estudios que profundicen respecto a los efectos que tienen las creencias culturales en el comportamiento tanto del agresor como de la víctima. Teniendo esto en cuenta, el objetivo de la presente investigación fue determinar la relación entre las creencias acerca de la violencia y la prevalencia de la violencia en el noviazgo. Para ello, se contó con una muestra de 420 estudiantes de dos universidades públicas mexicanas que respondieron el Inventario de creencias acerca de la violencia hacia la esposa, el Inventario de conflictos en las relaciones de noviazgo, y un cuestionario de información sociodemográfica. Los datos recolectados fueron examinados por medio de un análisis de correlación canónica, y los resultados mostraron que el modelo en general fue estadísticamente significativo (Wilks λ = .654, F (20, 677.54) = 4.626, p < .05); que el tamaño del efecto del modelo general fue de .346, lo que indica que este explicó el 34.6 % de la varianza compartida por los dos conjuntos de variables; y que, específicamente en la primera función, el coeficiente de mayor magnitud fue el de la variable de justificación de la violencia (r2 s= 76.2; h2 = 90.0), seguido por la del apoyo que se le puede brindar a la víctima (r2 s = 57.1; h2 = 94.5).Dating violence is a multifactorial phenomenon that requires in-depth studies regarding the effects that cultural beliefs have on the behavior of both the aggressor and the victim. With this in mind, the objective of this research was to determine the relationship between beliefs about violence and the prevalence of dating violence. To this end, a sample of 420 students from two Mexican public universities answered the Inventory of Beliefs about Wife Violence, the Inventory of Conflicts in Dating Relationships, and a sociodemographic information questionnaire. The data collected were examined through a canonical correlation analysis, and the results showed that the overall model was statistically significant (Wilks λ = .654, F (20, 677.54) = 4.626, p < .05); that the effect size of the overall model was .346, indicating that it explained 34. 6 % of the variance shared by the two sets of variables; and that, specifically in the first function, the coefficient of greatest magnitude was that of the variable of justification of the violence (r2 s = 76.2; h2 = 90.0), followed by that of the support that can be given to the victim (r2 s = 57.1; h2 = 94.5).text/htmlapplication/pdftext/xml10.14718/ACP.2021.24.1.141909-97110123-9155https://hdl.handle.net/10983/28482https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2021.24.1.14spaUniversidad Católica de Colombiahttps://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/2799/3755https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/2799/3618https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/2799/3770Núm. 1 , Año 2021 : Volumen 24, número 1.166115424Acta Colombiana de PsicologíaAbrams, D., Viki, G. T., Masser, B., & Bohner, G. (2003). Perception of a stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 111-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.111Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. En W. M. Kurtines y J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development: Theory, research and applications (pp. 71-129).Erlbaum. Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364-374. http://dx.doi. org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364Bybee, D. I., & Sullivan, C. M. (2002). The process through which an advocacy intervention resulted in positive change for battered women over time. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(1), 103-132. http://dx.doi. org/10.1023/A:1014376202459Calvete, E., & Cardeñoso, O. (2005). Gender differences in cognitive vulnerability to depression and behavior problems in adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 179-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10802-005-1826-yCauffman, E., Feldman, S. S., Arnett, L. J., & Jensen, J. A. (2000). The (un)acceptability of violence against peers and dates. Journal of Adolescent Research, 15(6), 652-673. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0743558400156003Cava, M. J., Martínez-Ferrer, B., Buelga, S., & Carrascosa, L. (2020). Sexist attitudes, romantic myths, and offline dating violence as predictors of cyber dating violence perpetration in adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 111, 106449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106449Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5. ª ed.). Sage publications.Darteh, E. K. M., Dickson, K. S., Rominski, S. D., & Moyer, C. A. (2020). Justification of physical intimate partner violence among men in sub-Saharan Africa: a multinational analysis of demographic and health survey data. Journal of Public Health, 33, 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s10389-020-01260-9Díaz-Aguado, M. J. (2003). Adolescencia, sexismo y violencia de género. Papeles del Psicólogo, 23(84), 35-44. http:// www.papelesdelpsicologo.es/resumen?pii=1053Díaz-Aguado, M. J., & Martínez, A. (2001). La construcción de la igualdad y la prevención de la violencia contra la mujer desde la educación secundaria. Instituto de la mujer.Durán, M., Moya, M., Megías, J. L., & Viki, G. T. (2010). Social perception of rape victims in dating and married relationships: the role of perpetrator’s benevolent sexism. Sex Roles, 62, 505-519. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s11199-009-9676-7Fernández-Antelo, I., Cuadrado-Gordillo, I., & Martín-Mora, G. (2020). Synergy between acceptance of violence and sexist attitudes as a dating violence risk factor. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(14), 5209. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145209Fernández-Fuertes, A. A., Fuertes, A., & Pulido, R. F. (2006). Evaluación de la violencia en las relaciones de pareja de los adolescentes. Validación del Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI) - versión española. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 6(2), 339-358. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?co digo=1983727&orden=65963&info=linkFerrer-Pérez, V. A., Bosch-Fiol, E., Ramis-Palmer, M. C., & Navarro-Guzmán, C. (2006). Las creencias y actitudes sobre la violencia contra las mujeres en la pareja: Determinantes sociodemográficos, familiares y formativos. Anales de psicología, 22(2), 251-259. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo. oa?id=16722210Fish, L. (1988). Why multivariate methods are usually vital. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 21(3), 130-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07 481756.1988.12022895Forbes, G. B., Jobe, R. L., White, K. B., Bloesch, E., & AdamsCurtis, L. E. (2005). Perceptions of dating violence following a sexual or nonsexual betrayal of trust: effects of gender, sexism, acceptance of rape myths, and vengeance motivation. Sex Roles, 52(3-4), 165-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11199-005-1292-6Foshee, V. A., Bauman, K. E., & Linder, G. F. (1999). Family violence and the perpetration of adolescent dating violence: Examining social learning and social control processes. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(2), 331-342. http:// dx.doi.org/10.2307/353752Furinghetti, F., & Pehkonen, E. (2002). Rethinking characterizations of beliefs. En G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen y G. Törner (Eds.). Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 39-57). Kluwer Academic PublishersGlick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491- 512. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491Goodman, L., Dutton, M. A., Vankos, N., & Weinfurt, K. (2005). Women’s resources and use of strategies as risk and protective factors for reabuse over time. Violence Against Women, 11(3), 311-336. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/1077801204273297Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1984). Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice Hall.Haj-Yahia, M., & Uysal, A. (2008). Beliefs about wife beating among medical students from Turkey. Journal of Family Violence, 23, 119-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s10896-007-9134-7Hargreaves, S., L. Vetten, V. Schneider, L. Malepe, L., & Fuller, R. (2006). Marriage is like sitting on red coals: A case study of domestic violence in four villages of the Moretele District, Tshwane metropole. Center for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation.Hunnicutt, G. (2009). Varieties of patriarchy and violence against women: Resurrecting “patriarchy” as a theoretical tool. Violence Against Women, 15(5), 553-573. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077801208331246Instituto Mexicano de la Juventud. (2008). Encuesta nacional de violencia en las relaciones de noviazgo 2007. INEGI.Lameiras, M., & Rodríguez, Y. (2002). Evaluación del sexismo moderno en los adolescentes. Revista de Psicología Social, 17(2), 119-127. https://doi. org/10.1174/021347402320007555Lewis, S. F., & Fremouw, W. (2001). Dating violence: A critical review of the literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 21(1), 105-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(99)00042-2Mahlstedt, D. L., & Welsh, L. A. (2005). Perceived causes of physical assault in heterosexual dating relationships. Violence Against Women, 11(4), 447-472. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/1077801204273298Moya, M., Glick, P., Expósito, F., De Lemus, S., & Hart, J. (2007). It’s for your own good: Benevolent Sexism and women’s reactions to protectively justified restrictions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(10), 1421- 1434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167207304790Orozco, A. E., Nievar, M. A., & Middlemiss, W. (2012). Domestic violence in Mexico: Perspectives of Mexican Counselors. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 43(5), 751-772. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.43.5.751Reitzel-Jaffe, D., & Wolfe, D. A. (2001). Predictors of relationship abuse among young men. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16(2), 99-115. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/088626001016002001Rey-Anacona, C. A. (2013). Prevalencia y tipos de maltrato en el noviazgo en adolescentes y adultos jóvenes. Terapia Psicológica, 31(2), 143-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/ S0718-48082013000200001Rivera, L., Allen, B., Rodríguez, G., Chávez, R., & Lazcano, E. (2007). Prevalence and correlates of adolescent dating violence: Baseline study of a cohort of 7960 male and female Mexican public school students. Preventive Medicine, 44(6), 477-484. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.02.020Russo, N. F., & Pirlott, A. (2006). Gender-based violence concepts, methods, and findings. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1087(1), 178-205. https://doi. org/10.1196/annals.1385.024Sakalli-Ugurlu, N., Glick, P., & Yalcin, Z. S. (2007). Ambivalent sexism, Belief in a Just World, and empathy as predictors of Turkish students’ attitudes toward rape victims. Sex Roles, 57, 889-895. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9313-2Saunders, D. G., Lynch, A. B., Grayson, M., & Linz, D. (1987). The Inventory of Beliefs about Wife Beating: The construction and initial validation of a measure of beliefs and attitudes. Violence and Victims, 2(1), 39-57. https://doi. org/10.1891/0886-6708.2.1.39Shen, A. C.-T., Chiu, M. Y.-L., & Gao, J. (2012). Predictors of dating violence among Chinese adolescents: The role of gender-role beliefs and justification of violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(6), 1066-1089. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/0886260511424497Sherry, A., & Henson, R. K. (2005) Conducting and interpreting canonical correlation analysis in personality research: A user-friendly primer. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84(1), 37-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/ s15327752jpa8401_09Sugarman, D. B., & Frankel, S. L. (1996). Patriarchal ideology and wife-assault: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Family Violence, 11, 13-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02333338Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics (6. ª ed.). Person Education.Tang, C. S. K., Wong, D., & Cheung, F. M. C. (2002). Social construction of women as legitimate victims of violence in Chinese societies. Violence Against Women, 8(8), 968-996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107780102400447096Temurtas, A. (2016). Canonical correlation analysis. En C. O. Guzeller (Ed.). Multivariate statistics for all (pp.101-112). Maya Academy Publication.Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. En D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 127- 146). Macmillan Publishing Co, Inc.Thompson, B. (1984). Canonical correlation analysis: Uses and interpretation. Sage.Thompson, B. (1991). A primer on the logic and use of canonical correlation analysis. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 24(2), 80-95. https://psycnet. apa.org/record/1991-32137-001Tonsing, J. C., & Tonsing, K. N. (2019). Understanding the role of patriarchal ideology in intimate partner violence among South Asian women in Hong Kong. International Social Work, 62(1), 161-171. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/0020872817712566Waltermaurer, E. (2012). Public justification of intimate partner violence: A review of the literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 13(3), 167-175. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/1524838012447699Wolfe, D. A., Scott, K., Reitzel-Jaffe, D., Wekerle, C., Grasley, C., & Pittman, A. L. (2001). Development and validation of the conflict in adolescent dating relationships inventory. Psychological Assessment, 13(2), 277-293. http://dx.doi. org/10.1037/1040-3590.13.2.277Zink, T., Regan, S., Jacobson, C. J., & Pabst, S. (2003). Cohort, period, and aging effects: A qualitative study of older women’s reasons for remaining in abusive relationships. Violence Against Women, 9(12), 1429-1441. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/1077801203259231Žukauskienė, R., Kaniušonytė, G., Bergman, L. R., Bakaitytė, A., & Truskauskaitė-Kunevičienė, I. (2019). The role of social support in identity processes and posttraumatic growth: A study of victims of intimate partner violence. Journal of interpersonal violence. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/0886260519836785Acta Colombiana de Psicología - 2021info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/2799Dating violenceBeliefsJustification of violenceSupport for the victimPunishment of the perpetratorViolencia en el noviazgoCreenciasJustificación de la violenciaApoyo a la víctimaCastigo al perpetradorCreencias sobre la violencia y sus efectos en la prevalencia de la violencia en el noviazgoBeliefs about violence and its effects on the prevalence of dating violenceArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2828https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/96247227-c2ec-49e1-8ac9-7023fa9ff76b/downloadc9bc6cf42a9c192f5fd1bb8491054064MD5110983/28482oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/284822023-03-24 16:58:12.514https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Acta Colombiana de Psicología - 2021https://repository.ucatolica.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaCbdigital@metabiblioteca.com