Investigación de la capacidad de los factores del Inventario Dimensional Clínico de Personalidad 2 para discriminar personas con dependencia de sustancias

El objetivo de este estudio fue verificar la capacidad de los factores del Inventario Dimensional Clínico de la Personalidad-2 (IDCP-2) en la identificación de personas con dependencia química, así como comparar su capacidad discriminatoria con otro instrumento que evalúa rasgos patológicos, el Pers...

Full description

Autores:: Pereira-Gonçalves, André
Salvador, Ana Paula
Carvalho, Lucas de Francisco

Tipo de recurso:: Article of investigation

Fecha de publicación:: 2021

Institución:: Universidad Católica de Colombia

Repositorio:: RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica

Idioma:: eng

id	UCATOLICA2_e4a72563ec18309dcfcb2e0d114257d7
oai_identifier_str	oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/28479
network_acronym_str	UCATOLICA2
network_name_str	RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	Investigación de la capacidad de los factores del Inventario Dimensional Clínico de Personalidad 2 para discriminar personas con dependencia de sustancias
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv	Investigation on the capacity of the factors of the Clinical Dimensional Personality Inventory 2 for identifying people with substance dependence
title	Investigación de la capacidad de los factores del Inventario Dimensional Clínico de Personalidad 2 para discriminar personas con dependencia de sustancias
spellingShingle	Investigación de la capacidad de los factores del Inventario Dimensional Clínico de Personalidad 2 para discriminar personas con dependencia de sustancias Psychological assessment Public health Drug addiction Evaluación psicológica Salud pública Dependencia química
title_short	Investigación de la capacidad de los factores del Inventario Dimensional Clínico de Personalidad 2 para discriminar personas con dependencia de sustancias
title_full	Investigación de la capacidad de los factores del Inventario Dimensional Clínico de Personalidad 2 para discriminar personas con dependencia de sustancias
title_fullStr	Investigación de la capacidad de los factores del Inventario Dimensional Clínico de Personalidad 2 para discriminar personas con dependencia de sustancias
title_full_unstemmed	Investigación de la capacidad de los factores del Inventario Dimensional Clínico de Personalidad 2 para discriminar personas con dependencia de sustancias
title_sort	Investigación de la capacidad de los factores del Inventario Dimensional Clínico de Personalidad 2 para discriminar personas con dependencia de sustancias
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Pereira-Gonçalves, André Salvador, Ana Paula Carvalho, Lucas de Francisco
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv	Pereira-Gonçalves, André Salvador, Ana Paula Carvalho, Lucas de Francisco
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv	Psychological assessment Public health Drug addiction
topic	Psychological assessment Public health Drug addiction Evaluación psicológica Salud pública Dependencia química
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	Evaluación psicológica Salud pública Dependencia química
description	El objetivo de este estudio fue verificar la capacidad de los factores del Inventario Dimensional Clínico de la Personalidad-2 (IDCP-2) en la identificación de personas con dependencia química, así como comparar su capacidad discriminatoria con otro instrumento que evalúa rasgos patológicos, el Personality Inventory for DSM -5 (PID-5). La muestra contó con 253 personas divididas en tres grupos: población general, con 110 personas con edades entre 20 y 66 años (M = 32.3, DP = 10.1) y 71,8% del sexo femenino; subclínico, con 119 individuos con edades entre 18 y 63 años (M = 30,4, DP = 8,34) y 61,3% del sexo femenino; clínico, con 24 participantes siendo 83,3% del sexo masculino y con edades entre 19 y 59 años (M = 36,4, DP = 11,2). Se aplicaron dos instrumentos para la identificación de la dependencia química (AUDIT y ASSIST), además del IDCP-2 y el PID-5. Los resultados indicaron que los factores utilizados del IDCP-2 son capaces de diferenciar los grupos, principalmente los extremos (clínico y población general). Además, se observó que el IDCP-2 posee capacidad predictiva de la dependencia química similar al PID-5. De esta manera, los hallazgos se configuran como evidencias preliminares de que los factores del IDCP-2 son capaces de identificar personas con dependencia química, siendo Desesperanza el factor principal en la evaluación de los dependientes químicos.
publishDate	2021
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2021-02-17 20:36:30 2023-01-23T15:43:30Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2021-02-17 20:36:30 2023-01-23T15:43:30Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2021-02-17
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversion.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.eng.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.driver.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv	Journal article
dc.type.redcol.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.version.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv	10.14718/ACP.2021.24.1.11
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv	1909-9711
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	0123-9155
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://hdl.handle.net/10983/28479
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2021.24.1.11
identifier_str_mv	10.14718/ACP.2021.24.1.11 1909-9711 0123-9155
url	https://hdl.handle.net/10983/28479 https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2021.24.1.11
dc.language.iso.eng.fl_str_mv	eng
language	eng
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv	https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/2712/3752 https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/2712/3615 https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/2712/3767
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv	Núm. 1 , Año 2021 : Volumen 24, número 1.
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv	129
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv	1
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv	121
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv	24
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv	Acta Colombiana de Psicología
dc.relation.references.eng.fl_str_mv	American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Pub. Baines, L., Jones, A., & Christiansen, P. (2016). Hopelessness and alcohol use: The mediating role of drinking motives and outcome expectancies. Addictive behaviors reports, 4, 65-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abrep.2016.11.001 Belcher, A. M., Volkow, N. D., Moeller, F. G., & Ferré, S. (2014). Personality traits and vulnerability or resilience to substance use disorders. Trends in cognitive sciences, 18(4), 211-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.01.010 Blanca Mena, M. J., Alarcón, R., Arnau Gras, J., Bono Cabré, R., & Bendayan, R. (2017). Non-normal data: is ANOVA still a valid option?. Psicothema, 29(4), 552-557. https:// doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.383 Bornovalova, M. A., Lejuez, C. W., Daughters, S. B., Rosenthal, M. Z., & Lynch, T. R. (2005). Impulsivity as a common process across borderline personality and substance use disorders. Clinical Psychology Review, 25(6), 790-812. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2005.05.005 Carvalho, L. D. F. (2018). Review study of the impulsiveness dimension of the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory. Universitas Psychologica, 17(1), 58-68. https:// dx.doi.org/10.11144/javeriana.upsy17-1.rsid Carvalho, L. D. F. (2019). Avaliação dos transtornos da personalidade no Brasil: panorama geral e ferramentas disponíveis. In M. N. Baptista, M. Muniz, C. T. Reppold, C. H. S. S. Nunes, L. F. Carvalho, R. Primi, A. P. P. Noronha, A. G. Seabra, S. W. Wechsler, C. S. Hutz, & L. Pasquali (Org.), Compêndio de Avaliação Psicológica. (1ed., pp. 569-579). Rio de Janeiro: Editora Vozes. Carvalho, L. D. F., & Pianowski, G. (2019a). Dependency, mood instability, and inconsequence traits for discriminating borderline personality disorder. Trends in psychiatry and psychotherapy, 41(1), 78-82. https://dx.doi. org/10.1590/2237-6089-2018-0010 Carvalho, L. D. F., & Pianowski, G. (2019b). Differentiating borderline personality disorder and bipolar disorder through emotional dependency, emotional instability, impulsiveness and aggressiveness traits. The European Journal of Psychiatry, 33(2), 91-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ejpsy.2019.03.001 Carvalho, L. D. F., Pianowski, G., & Gonçalves, A. P. (2018). Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory-2: investigating key factors on the assessment of dependent personality disorder. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 24(6), 732-738. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2018.1554254 Carvalho, L. F., Pianowski, G., Silveira, F. J., Bacciotti, J. T., & Vieira, P. G. (2016). Eccentricity dimension of the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory: review and psychometric properties. Estudos de Psicologia, 21(4), 359-368. http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1678-4669.20160035 Carvalho, L. F., & Primi, R. (no prelo). Manual técnico do Inventário Dimensional Clínico da Personalidade 2 (IDCP2) e versão triagem (IDCP-triagem). São Paulo: Pearson. Carvalho, L. D. F., & Primi, R. (2015). Development and internal structure investigation of the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 28(2), 322-330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7153.201528212 Carvalho, L. D. F., & Sette, C. P. (2015). Review and verification of the psychometric properties of the mood instability dimension of the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 18(2), 115-127. https://dx.doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2015.18.2.10 Carvalho, L. D. F., & Sette, C. P. (2017). Revision of the criticism avoidance dimension of the dimensional clinical personality inventory. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 34(2), 219- 231. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-02752017000200004 Carvalho, L. D. F., Sette, C. P., & Ferrari, B. L. (2016). Revision of the grandiosity dimension of the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory and verification of its psychometric properties. Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 38(3), 147-155. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-016-0022-z Carvalho, L. F., & Silva, G. C. (2016). Review of the self-sacrifice dimension of the Clinical Dimensional Personality Inventory. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 29(6), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-016-0022-z Chapman, A. L., & Cellucci, T. (2007). The role of antisocial and borderline personality features in substance dependence among incarcerated females. Addictive Behaviors, 32(6), 1131-1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.08.001 Clark, L. A. (1990). Toward a consensual set of symptom clusters for assessment of personality disorder. In: Butcher JN, Spielberger CD, editors, Advances in personality assessment. (pp. 243-266). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications Ersche, K. D., Turton, A. J., Pradhan, S., Bullmore, E. T., & Robbins, T. W. (2010). Drug addiction endophenotypes: impulsive versus sensation-seeking personality traits. Biological Psychiatry, 68(8), 770-773. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.06.015 Feingold, D., Weiser, M., Rehm, J., & Lev-Ran, S. (2016). The association between cannabis use and anxiety disorders: results from a population-based representative sample. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 26(3), 493-505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.12.037 Frisher, M., Crome, I., Macleod, J., Bloor, R., & Hickman, M. (2007). Predictive factors for illicit drug use among young people. Home Office. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/fcb3 /8c9b9cf010b53c2f30aa135eb1094c5951ef.pdf George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 17.0 update (10a ed.) Boston: Pearson. Goode, E. (2007). Theories of drug use. In McGraw Hill, Drugs in American Society (pp.55-58). Boston, Mass. Grant, B. F., Stinson, F. S., Dawson, D. A., Chou, S. P., Dufour, M. C., Compton, W., & Kaplan, K. (2004). Prevalence and co-occurrence of substance use disorders and independent mood and anxiety disorders: results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61(8), 807-816. https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.61.8.807 Henrique, I. F. S., Micheli, D., Lacerda, R. B. D., Lacerda, L. A. D., & Formigoni, M. L. O. D. S. (2004). Validação da versão brasileira do teste de triagem do envolvimento com álcool, cigarro e outras substâncias (ASSIST). Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, 50(2), 199-206. https:// dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-42302004000200039 Karamat, M., & Ahmed, S. (2015). Collective self-esteem and hopelessness among people with substance use. Pakistan Journal of Psychology, 46(2). https://search.proquest.com/ docview/1891725868?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenvie w=true Kotov, R., Gamez, W., Schmidt, F., & Watson, D. (2010). Linking "big" personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 768-821. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020327 Kotov, R., Krueger, R. F., Watson, D., Achenbach, T. M., Althoff, R. R., Bagby, R. M., ... & Eaton, N. R. (2017). The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): a dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126(4), 454-477. https://doi. org/10.1037/abn0000258 Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2011). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42(9), 1879-1890. https://doi. org/10.1017/S0033291711002674 Lai, H. M. X., Cleary, M., Sitharthan, T., & Hunt, G. E. (2015). Prevalence of comorbid substance use, anxiety and mood disorders in epidemiological surveys, 1990– 2014: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 154, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. drugalcdep.2015.05.031 Lima, C. T., Freire, A. C. C., Silva, A. P. B., Teixeira, R. M., Farrell, M., & Prince, M. (2005). Concurrent and construct validity of the AUDIT in an urban Brazilian sample. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 40(6), 584-589. https://doi.org/10.1093/ alcalc/agh202 Littlefield, A. K., & Sher, K. J. (2016).Personality and Substance Use Disorders. Oxford Handbooks Online. https://doi.org /10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199381678.001.0001 Loree, A. M., Lundahl, L. H., & Ledgerwood, D. M. (2015). Impulsivity as a predictor of treatment outcome in substance use disorders: review and synthesis. Drug and Alcohol Review, 34(2), 119-134. https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.12132 Marín-Navarrete, R., Toledo-Fernández, A., VillalobosGallegos, L., Roncero, C., Szerman, N., & Medina-Mora, M. E. (2018). Latent impulsivity subtypes in substance use disorders and interactions with internalizing and externalizing co-occurring disorders. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9, 1-9. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00027 Mendéz, E. B. (1999). Uma versão brasileira do AUDIT (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test). Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas (RS). Merz, F. (2018). United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime: World Drug Report 2017. 2017. SIRIUS-Zeitschrift für Strategische Analysen, 2(1), 85-86. https://doi.org/10.1515/ sirius-2018-0016 Millon, T. (2011). Disorders of personality: introducing a DSM/ICD spectrum from normal to abnormal. New Jersey: Wiley. Ministério da Saúde & Conselho Nacional de Saúde. (2012). Resolução nº 466, de 12 de dezembro de 2012. Diretrizes e normas regulamentadoras de pesquisas envolvendo seres humanos. Diário Oficial da União [da] República Federativa do Brasil, 150(112). http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/ bvs/saudelegis/cns/2013/res0466_12_12_2012.html Mitchell, M. R., & Potenza, M. N. (2014). Addictions and personality traits: impulsivity and related constructs. Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports, 1(1), 1-12. https://doi. org/10.1007/s40473-013-0001-y Moder, K. (2007). How to keep the Type I Error Rate in ANOVA if Variances are Heteroscedastic. Austrian Journal of Statistics, 36(3), 179-188. https://doi.org/10.17713/ajs.v36i3.329 Moder, K. (2010). Alternatives to F-test in one way ANOVA in case of heterogeneity of variances (a simulation study). Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52(4), 343- 353. https://www.psychologie-aktuell.com/fileadmin/download/ptam/4-2010_20101218/01_Moder.pdf Moraleda-Barreno, E., Díaz-Batanero, C., Pérez-Moreno, P. J., Gómez-Bujedo, J., & Lozano, O. M. (2018). Relations between facets and personality domains with impulsivity: new evidence using the DSM-5 Section III framework in patients with substance use disorders. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment. 9(5), 490-495. https:// doi.org/10.1037/per0000278 Nakhaee, N., & Jadidi, N. (2009). Why do some teens turn to drugs? a focus group study of drug users' experiences. Journal of Addictions Nursing, 20(4), 203-208. https:// doi.org/10.3109/10884600903291158 Organização Mundial da Saúde - WHO. (2015). CID-10: Classificação Estatística Internacional de Doenças com disquete Vol. 3. Edusp. Santos, W. S. D., Gouveia, V. V., Fernandes, D. P., Souza, S. S. B. D., & Grangeiro, A. S. D. M. (2012). Alcohol use disorder identification test (AUDIT): exploring its psychometric parameters. Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria, 61(3), 117- 123. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0047-20852012000300001 Shedler, J., & Westen, D. (2004). Refining personality disorder diagnosis: integrating science and practice. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161(8), 1350-1365. https://doi. org/10.1176/appi.ajp.161.8.1350 Verdejo-García, A., Lawrence, A. J., & Clark, L. (2008). Impulsivity as a vulnerability marker for substance-use disorders: review of findings from high-risk research, problem gamblers and genetic association studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 32(4), 777-810. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.11.003
dc.rights.eng.fl_str_mv	Acta Colombiana de Psicología - 2021
dc.rights.accessrights.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.eng.fl_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv	Acta Colombiana de Psicología - 2021 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.eng.fl_str_mv	text/html application/pdf text/xml
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad Católica de Colombia
dc.source.eng.fl_str_mv	https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/2712
institution	Universidad Católica de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/d896771f-ed31-4c76-9e46-2ecba1e1ff65/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	f3b4342b4634c6c1a8c67f05fa102cba
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_	1808402672490905600
spelling	Pereira-Gonçalves, André5d34e068-04fb-4c16-a994-442b19a3c4d8Salvador, Ana Paula1c9b3a99-9654-4e49-9a79-f9510d3c8510300Carvalho, Lucas de Francisco4068033e-4412-4196-8e06-2d1657ad2bc13002021-02-17 20:36:302023-01-23T15:43:30Z2021-02-17 20:36:302023-01-23T15:43:30Z2021-02-17El objetivo de este estudio fue verificar la capacidad de los factores del Inventario Dimensional Clínico de la Personalidad-2 (IDCP-2) en la identificación de personas con dependencia química, así como comparar su capacidad discriminatoria con otro instrumento que evalúa rasgos patológicos, el Personality Inventory for DSM -5 (PID-5). La muestra contó con 253 personas divididas en tres grupos: población general, con 110 personas con edades entre 20 y 66 años (M = 32.3, DP = 10.1) y 71,8% del sexo femenino; subclínico, con 119 individuos con edades entre 18 y 63 años (M = 30,4, DP = 8,34) y 61,3% del sexo femenino; clínico, con 24 participantes siendo 83,3% del sexo masculino y con edades entre 19 y 59 años (M = 36,4, DP = 11,2). Se aplicaron dos instrumentos para la identificación de la dependencia química (AUDIT y ASSIST), además del IDCP-2 y el PID-5. Los resultados indicaron que los factores utilizados del IDCP-2 son capaces de diferenciar los grupos, principalmente los extremos (clínico y población general). Además, se observó que el IDCP-2 posee capacidad predictiva de la dependencia química similar al PID-5. De esta manera, los hallazgos se configuran como evidencias preliminares de que los factores del IDCP-2 son capaces de identificar personas con dependencia química, siendo Desesperanza el factor principal en la evaluación de los dependientes químicos.The study aimed to verify the discriminant capacity of the factors of the Clinical Dimensional Personality Inventory 2 (IDCP-2) in the identification of people with substance dependence, as well as to compare this capacity with another instrument that evaluates pathological traits, the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). The sample was composed of 253 adults distributed in three groups: community sample, represented by 110 individuals with ages between 20 and 66 years (M = 32.3; SD = 10,1), 71.8% women; subclinical, 119 individual aged from 18 to 63 (M = 30.4; SD = 8.34), 61.3% women; clinical, 24 individual with ages between 19 and 59 (M = 36,4; SD = 11.2), 83.3% men. Two scales for substance dependence identification were administered (AUDIT and ASSIST), IDCP-2, and PID-5. Findings indicated that IDCP-2 is capable of discriminating between groups, mainly the extreme ones (i.e., clinical sample versus community sample). Moreover, similar discriminant capacity between IDCP-2 and PID-5 was observed. These findings are preliminary evidence that the IDCP-2 factors can identify people with substance dependence, with Hopelessness being the leading factor in the assessment of substance dependents.text/htmlapplication/pdftext/xml10.14718/ACP.2021.24.1.111909-97110123-9155https://hdl.handle.net/10983/28479https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2021.24.1.11engUniversidad Católica de Colombiahttps://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/2712/3752https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/2712/3615https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/2712/3767Núm. 1 , Año 2021 : Volumen 24, número 1.129112124Acta Colombiana de PsicologíaAmerican Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Pub.Baines, L., Jones, A., & Christiansen, P. (2016). Hopelessness and alcohol use: The mediating role of drinking motives and outcome expectancies. Addictive behaviors reports, 4, 65-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abrep.2016.11.001Belcher, A. M., Volkow, N. D., Moeller, F. G., & Ferré, S. (2014). Personality traits and vulnerability or resilience to substance use disorders. Trends in cognitive sciences, 18(4), 211-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.01.010Blanca Mena, M. J., Alarcón, R., Arnau Gras, J., Bono Cabré, R., & Bendayan, R. (2017). Non-normal data: is ANOVA still a valid option?. Psicothema, 29(4), 552-557. https:// doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.383Bornovalova, M. A., Lejuez, C. W., Daughters, S. B., Rosenthal, M. Z., & Lynch, T. R. (2005). Impulsivity as a common process across borderline personality and substance use disorders. Clinical Psychology Review, 25(6), 790-812. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2005.05.005Carvalho, L. D. F. (2018). Review study of the impulsiveness dimension of the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory. Universitas Psychologica, 17(1), 58-68. https:// dx.doi.org/10.11144/javeriana.upsy17-1.rsidCarvalho, L. D. F. (2019). Avaliação dos transtornos da personalidade no Brasil: panorama geral e ferramentas disponíveis. In M. N. Baptista, M. Muniz, C. T. Reppold, C. H. S. S. Nunes, L. F. Carvalho, R. Primi, A. P. P. Noronha, A. G. Seabra, S. W. Wechsler, C. S. Hutz, & L. Pasquali (Org.), Compêndio de Avaliação Psicológica. (1ed., pp. 569-579). Rio de Janeiro: Editora Vozes.Carvalho, L. D. F., & Pianowski, G. (2019a). Dependency, mood instability, and inconsequence traits for discriminating borderline personality disorder. Trends in psychiatry and psychotherapy, 41(1), 78-82. https://dx.doi. org/10.1590/2237-6089-2018-0010Carvalho, L. D. F., & Pianowski, G. (2019b). Differentiating borderline personality disorder and bipolar disorder through emotional dependency, emotional instability, impulsiveness and aggressiveness traits. The European Journal of Psychiatry, 33(2), 91-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ejpsy.2019.03.001Carvalho, L. D. F., Pianowski, G., & Gonçalves, A. P. (2018). Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory-2: investigating key factors on the assessment of dependent personality disorder. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 24(6), 732-738. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2018.1554254Carvalho, L. F., Pianowski, G., Silveira, F. J., Bacciotti, J. T., & Vieira, P. G. (2016). Eccentricity dimension of the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory: review and psychometric properties. Estudos de Psicologia, 21(4), 359-368. http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1678-4669.20160035Carvalho, L. F., & Primi, R. (no prelo). Manual técnico do Inventário Dimensional Clínico da Personalidade 2 (IDCP2) e versão triagem (IDCP-triagem). São Paulo: Pearson.Carvalho, L. D. F., & Primi, R. (2015). Development and internal structure investigation of the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 28(2), 322-330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7153.201528212Carvalho, L. D. F., & Sette, C. P. (2015). Review and verification of the psychometric properties of the mood instability dimension of the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 18(2), 115-127. https://dx.doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2015.18.2.10Carvalho, L. D. F., & Sette, C. P. (2017). Revision of the criticism avoidance dimension of the dimensional clinical personality inventory. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 34(2), 219- 231. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-02752017000200004Carvalho, L. D. F., Sette, C. P., & Ferrari, B. L. (2016). Revision of the grandiosity dimension of the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory and verification of its psychometric properties. Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 38(3), 147-155. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-016-0022-zCarvalho, L. F., & Silva, G. C. (2016). Review of the self-sacrifice dimension of the Clinical Dimensional Personality Inventory. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 29(6), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-016-0022-zChapman, A. L., & Cellucci, T. (2007). The role of antisocial and borderline personality features in substance dependence among incarcerated females. Addictive Behaviors, 32(6), 1131-1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.08.001Clark, L. A. (1990). Toward a consensual set of symptom clusters for assessment of personality disorder. In: Butcher JN, Spielberger CD, editors, Advances in personality assessment. (pp. 243-266). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE PublicationsErsche, K. D., Turton, A. J., Pradhan, S., Bullmore, E. T., & Robbins, T. W. (2010). Drug addiction endophenotypes: impulsive versus sensation-seeking personality traits. Biological Psychiatry, 68(8), 770-773. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.06.015Feingold, D., Weiser, M., Rehm, J., & Lev-Ran, S. (2016). The association between cannabis use and anxiety disorders: results from a population-based representative sample. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 26(3), 493-505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.12.037Frisher, M., Crome, I., Macleod, J., Bloor, R., & Hickman, M. (2007). Predictive factors for illicit drug use among young people. Home Office. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/fcb3 /8c9b9cf010b53c2f30aa135eb1094c5951ef.pdfGeorge, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 17.0 update (10a ed.) Boston: Pearson.Goode, E. (2007). Theories of drug use. In McGraw Hill, Drugs in American Society (pp.55-58). Boston, Mass.Grant, B. F., Stinson, F. S., Dawson, D. A., Chou, S. P., Dufour, M. C., Compton, W., & Kaplan, K. (2004). Prevalence and co-occurrence of substance use disorders and independent mood and anxiety disorders: results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61(8), 807-816. https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.61.8.807Henrique, I. F. S., Micheli, D., Lacerda, R. B. D., Lacerda, L. A. D., & Formigoni, M. L. O. D. S. (2004). Validação da versão brasileira do teste de triagem do envolvimento com álcool, cigarro e outras substâncias (ASSIST). Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, 50(2), 199-206. https:// dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-42302004000200039Karamat, M., & Ahmed, S. (2015). Collective self-esteem and hopelessness among people with substance use. Pakistan Journal of Psychology, 46(2). https://search.proquest.com/ docview/1891725868?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenvie w=trueKotov, R., Gamez, W., Schmidt, F., & Watson, D. (2010). Linking "big" personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 768-821. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020327Kotov, R., Krueger, R. F., Watson, D., Achenbach, T. M., Althoff, R. R., Bagby, R. M., ... & Eaton, N. R. (2017). The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): a dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126(4), 454-477. https://doi. org/10.1037/abn0000258Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2011). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42(9), 1879-1890. https://doi. org/10.1017/S0033291711002674Lai, H. M. X., Cleary, M., Sitharthan, T., & Hunt, G. E. (2015). Prevalence of comorbid substance use, anxiety and mood disorders in epidemiological surveys, 1990– 2014: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 154, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. drugalcdep.2015.05.031Lima, C. T., Freire, A. C. C., Silva, A. P. B., Teixeira, R. M., Farrell, M., & Prince, M. (2005). Concurrent and construct validity of the AUDIT in an urban Brazilian sample. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 40(6), 584-589. https://doi.org/10.1093/ alcalc/agh202Littlefield, A. K., & Sher, K. J. (2016).Personality and Substance Use Disorders. Oxford Handbooks Online. https://doi.org /10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199381678.001.0001Loree, A. M., Lundahl, L. H., & Ledgerwood, D. M. (2015). Impulsivity as a predictor of treatment outcome in substance use disorders: review and synthesis. Drug and Alcohol Review, 34(2), 119-134. https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.12132Marín-Navarrete, R., Toledo-Fernández, A., VillalobosGallegos, L., Roncero, C., Szerman, N., & Medina-Mora, M. E. (2018). Latent impulsivity subtypes in substance use disorders and interactions with internalizing and externalizing co-occurring disorders. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9, 1-9. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00027Mendéz, E. B. (1999). Uma versão brasileira do AUDIT (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test). Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas (RS).Merz, F. (2018). United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime: World Drug Report 2017. 2017. SIRIUS-Zeitschrift für Strategische Analysen, 2(1), 85-86. https://doi.org/10.1515/ sirius-2018-0016Millon, T. (2011). Disorders of personality: introducing a DSM/ICD spectrum from normal to abnormal. New Jersey: Wiley.Ministério da Saúde & Conselho Nacional de Saúde. (2012). Resolução nº 466, de 12 de dezembro de 2012. Diretrizes e normas regulamentadoras de pesquisas envolvendo seres humanos. Diário Oficial da União [da] República Federativa do Brasil, 150(112). http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/ bvs/saudelegis/cns/2013/res0466_12_12_2012.htmlMitchell, M. R., & Potenza, M. N. (2014). Addictions and personality traits: impulsivity and related constructs. Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports, 1(1), 1-12. https://doi. org/10.1007/s40473-013-0001-yModer, K. (2007). How to keep the Type I Error Rate in ANOVA if Variances are Heteroscedastic. Austrian Journal of Statistics, 36(3), 179-188. https://doi.org/10.17713/ajs.v36i3.329Moder, K. (2010). Alternatives to F-test in one way ANOVA in case of heterogeneity of variances (a simulation study). Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52(4), 343- 353. https://www.psychologie-aktuell.com/fileadmin/download/ptam/4-2010_20101218/01_Moder.pdfMoraleda-Barreno, E., Díaz-Batanero, C., Pérez-Moreno, P. J., Gómez-Bujedo, J., & Lozano, O. M. (2018). Relations between facets and personality domains with impulsivity: new evidence using the DSM-5 Section III framework in patients with substance use disorders. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment. 9(5), 490-495. https:// doi.org/10.1037/per0000278Nakhaee, N., & Jadidi, N. (2009). Why do some teens turn to drugs? a focus group study of drug users' experiences. Journal of Addictions Nursing, 20(4), 203-208. https:// doi.org/10.3109/10884600903291158Organização Mundial da Saúde - WHO. (2015). CID-10: Classificação Estatística Internacional de Doenças com disquete Vol. 3. Edusp.Santos, W. S. D., Gouveia, V. V., Fernandes, D. P., Souza, S. S. B. D., & Grangeiro, A. S. D. M. (2012). Alcohol use disorder identification test (AUDIT): exploring its psychometric parameters. Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria, 61(3), 117- 123. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0047-20852012000300001Shedler, J., & Westen, D. (2004). Refining personality disorder diagnosis: integrating science and practice. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161(8), 1350-1365. https://doi. org/10.1176/appi.ajp.161.8.1350Verdejo-García, A., Lawrence, A. J., & Clark, L. (2008). Impulsivity as a vulnerability marker for substance-use disorders: review of findings from high-risk research, problem gamblers and genetic association studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 32(4), 777-810. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.11.003Acta Colombiana de Psicología - 2021info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/2712Psychological assessmentPublic healthDrug addictionEvaluación psicológicaSalud públicaDependencia químicaInvestigación de la capacidad de los factores del Inventario Dimensional Clínico de Personalidad 2 para discriminar personas con dependencia de sustanciasInvestigation on the capacity of the factors of the Clinical Dimensional Personality Inventory 2 for identifying people with substance dependenceArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2827https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/d896771f-ed31-4c76-9e46-2ecba1e1ff65/downloadf3b4342b4634c6c1a8c67f05fa102cbaMD5110983/28479oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/284792023-06-27 11:00:17.584https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Acta Colombiana de Psicología - 2021https://repository.ucatolica.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaCbdigital@metabiblioteca.com

Investigación de la capacidad de los factores del Inventario Dimensional Clínico de Personalidad 2 para discriminar personas con dependencia de sustancias

Publicaciones similares