Democracy is inclusive : arendt’s paradigm.

Este artículo se centra en la conexión entre una idea inclusiva de ciudadanía y el concepto real de democracia. Una buena definición de democracia enfatiza en el principio básico de la autonomía, y una noción adecuada de autonomía implica una doble cara: la pública y la personal. La reflexión de Han...

Full description

Autores:: Lalatta Costerbosa, Marina

Tipo de recurso:: Article of journal

Fecha de publicación:: 2018

Institución:: Universidad Católica de Colombia

Repositorio:: RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica

Idioma:: eng

id	UCATOLICA2_e1cccd391478ba6eddc46e8d1c2e8726
oai_identifier_str	oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/29939
network_acronym_str	UCATOLICA2
network_name_str	RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	Democracy is inclusive : arendt’s paradigm.
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv	Democracy is inclusive : arendt’s paradigm.
title	Democracy is inclusive : arendt’s paradigm.
spellingShingle	Democracy is inclusive : arendt’s paradigm. Autonomía Ciudadanía Arendt Democracia Desestatización Autonomy Citizenship Arendt Democracy Statelessness
title_short	Democracy is inclusive : arendt’s paradigm.
title_full	Democracy is inclusive : arendt’s paradigm.
title_fullStr	Democracy is inclusive : arendt’s paradigm.
title_full_unstemmed	Democracy is inclusive : arendt’s paradigm.
title_sort	Democracy is inclusive : arendt’s paradigm.
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Lalatta Costerbosa, Marina
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv	Lalatta Costerbosa, Marina
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	Autonomía Ciudadanía Arendt Democracia Desestatización
topic	Autonomía Ciudadanía Arendt Democracia Desestatización Autonomy Citizenship Arendt Democracy Statelessness
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv	Autonomy Citizenship Arendt Democracy Statelessness
description	Este artículo se centra en la conexión entre una idea inclusiva de ciudadanía y el concepto real de democracia. Una buena definición de democracia enfatiza en el principio básico de la autonomía, y una noción adecuada de autonomía implica una doble cara: la pública y la personal. La reflexión de Hannah Arendt sobre la desestatización desempeña un papel paradigmático en esta perspectiva política y filosófica sobre la ciudadanía. A través del análisis de Arendt, el artículo intenta mostrar la naturaleza esencial de la relación entre democracia y ciudadanía inclusiva.
publishDate	2018
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2018-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2018-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2018-01-01
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.eng.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.driver.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv	Journal article
dc.type.redcol.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
dc.type.version.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv	2539-2239
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	2389-8232
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv	https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/2628
identifier_str_mv	2539-2239 2389-8232
url	https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/2628
dc.language.iso.eng.fl_str_mv	eng
language	eng
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv	https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/download/2628/2437
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv	Núm. 9 , Año 2018 :Enero - Junio
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv	184
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv	9
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv	164
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv	5
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv	Soft Power
dc.relation.references.eng.fl_str_mv	Agier, M. (2008). On the Margins of the World. The Refugee Experience Today. Malden/MA: Politiy Press. Agier, M. (2011). Managing the Undesirables. Refugee Camps and Humanitarians Government. Cambridge: Polity Press. Andrews, G. (Ed.) (1991). Citizenship. London: Lawrence and Wishart. Arendt, H. (1972). On Violence. In Crisis of the Republic (pp. 103-198). San Diego-New York-London: Harcourt Brace & Co. Arendt, H. (1979). The Origin of Totalitarianism (new edition with added Prefaces). San Diego-New York-London: Harcourt Brace & Co. Arendt, H. (1998).The Human Condition (Introduction by M. Canovan (Ed.)). Chicago-London: Chicago University Press. Arendt, H. (2003). Was ist Politik?: Fragmente aus dem Nachlaß. München: Piper Taschenbuch Balibar, É. (2010). Arendt, le droit aux droits et la désobéissance civique. In La proposition de l’égaliberté (pp. 201-227). Paris: Puf. Barbelet, J. M. (1989). Citizenship. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Benhabib, S. (Ed.) (1996). Democracy and Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Birmingham, P. (2006). Hannah Arendt and Human Rights. The Predicament of Common Responsibility. New York: Indiana University Press. Brożek, B. (2013). Philosophy and Neuroscience. Three Modes of Interaction. In J. Stelmach, B. Brożek & Ł. Kurek (Eds.). Philosophy in Neuroscience. Krakow: Copernicus Center Press. Carens, J. H. (2013). The Ethics of Immigration. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Castelfranchi, C. (2014). NeuroNorme: per un approccio non riduzionista. Cosa cercare e non cercare nel cervello. Rivista di filosofia del diritto, III, n.s. Castoriadis, C. (1975). L’institution imaginaire de la société. Paris: Le Seuil. Cohen, J. & Sabel, C. (1997, May). Directly-Deliberative Polyarchy. European Law Journal, 3(4), pp. 313-342. Cole, P. & Wellman, C. H. (2011). Debating the Ethics of Immigration. Is There a Right to Exclude? Oxford: Oxford University Press. Dworkin, R. (1993). Life’s Dominion. An Argument about Abortion, Euthanasia and Individual Freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Goldoni, M. & Maccorkindale, C. (2012) (Eds.). Hannah Arendt and the Law. Oxford-Portland/NY: Hart. Greblo, E. (2017). Luoghi a perdere. Hannah Arendt e la questione dei rifugiati. Scienza & Politica, 29(57), pp. 195-212. Dewey, J. (1954). The Public and its Problems. Chicago: Swallow Press. Habermas, J. (1992). Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge/MA: The MIT Press. Habermas, J. (1996). Three Normative Models of Democracy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and Difference (pp. 21-30). Princeton: Princeton University Press. Hayden, P. (2009). Political Evil in a Global Age. Hannah Arendt and International Theory. London: Routledge. Held, D. (1989). Political Theory and the Modern State. Essays on State, Power, and Democracy. London: Polity Press. Hume, D. (1748). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. II. 3. I. London: A. Millar. Iacoboni, M. (2008). I neuroni a specchio. Come capiamo ciò che fanno gli altri. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri. Kant, I. (1785). Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. In AA. BD., Kants gesammelte Schriften. IV. 1904, II. (pp. 385-463). Berlin: Hrsg. Von der Koniglich Preusen, Kant, I. (1793). Über den Gemeinspruch: Das mag in der Theorie richtig sein, taugt aber nicht für die Praxis. In AA. BD. Kants gesammelte Schriften VIII, 1912, II. (pp. 273-314). Berlin: De Gruyter. Kant, I. (1797). Die Metaphysik der Sitten: Der Streit der Fakultäten. London: Forgotten Books (2018). Kelsen, H. (1929). The Essence and Value of Democracy. N. Urbinati and C. Invernizzi Accetti (Eds.) (2013). Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Klabbers, J. (2007, March). Possible Islands of Predictability. The Legal Thought of Hannah Arendt. Leiden Journal of International Law, 20(1), pp. 1-23. Lalatta Costerbosa, M. (2014). Democrazia assediata. Rome: DeriveApprodi. Lalatta Costerbosa, M. (Ed.) (2016). Lo spazio della responsabilità. Approdi e limiti delle neuroscienze. Bologna: il Mulino. La Torre, M. (2004). Cittadinanza e ordine politico. Diritti, cirsi della sovranità e sfera pubblica in una prospettiva europea. Torino: Giappichelli. La Torre, M. (2013). Hannah Arendt and the Concept of Law. Against the Tradition. Archiv für Rechts-und Sozialphilosophie, 99(3), pp. 400-416. Lukes, S. (1982). Relativism in Its Place. In S. Lukes & M. Hollis (Eds.), Rationality and Relativism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Macready, J. D. (2017). Hannah Arendt and the Fragility of Human Dignity. Lanham/MD: Lexington Books. McCabe, D. P. & Castel, A. D. (2008, April). Seeing Is Believing. The Effect of Brain Images on Judgements of Scientific Reasoning. Cognition. 107(1), pp. 343-352. McCabe, D. P. & Castel, A. D. & Rhodes, M. G. (2011). The Influence of FMRI Lie Detection Evidence on Juror Decision Making. Behavioural Sciences and Law, pp. 566-577. Mill, J. S. (2008). On Liberty and Other Essays. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press. Nedelsky, J. (2001). Judgment, Diversity, and Relational Autonomy. In R. Beiner & J. Nedelsky (Eds.), Judgment, Imagination, and Politics. Themes from Kant and Arendt (pp. 103-120). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. Rizzato, M. & Donelli, D. (2011). Io sono il tuo specchio. Neuroni specchio ed empatia. Torino: Edizioni Amrita.
dc.rights.eng.fl_str_mv	Marina Lalatta Costerbosa - 2018
dc.rights.accessrights.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.eng.fl_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv	Marina Lalatta Costerbosa - 2018 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.eng.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Soft Power
dc.source.eng.fl_str_mv	https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/2628
institution	Universidad Católica de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/f7003a68-1a9a-4175-9fd6-e253b7375399/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	5d9702ddf9def6ecd02c6b6b978cf1f9
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_	1814256345867616256
spelling	Lalatta Costerbosa, Marina0786a483-432d-44b4-afb6-4886909fb3712018-01-01T00:00:00Z2018-01-01T00:00:00Z2018-01-01Este artículo se centra en la conexión entre una idea inclusiva de ciudadanía y el concepto real de democracia. Una buena definición de democracia enfatiza en el principio básico de la autonomía, y una noción adecuada de autonomía implica una doble cara: la pública y la personal. La reflexión de Hannah Arendt sobre la desestatización desempeña un papel paradigmático en esta perspectiva política y filosófica sobre la ciudadanía. A través del análisis de Arendt, el artículo intenta mostrar la naturaleza esencial de la relación entre democracia y ciudadanía inclusiva.This paper focuses on the connection between an inclusive idea of citizenship and the real concept of democracy. A good definition of democracy stresses the basic principle of autonomy, and an adequate notion of autonomy implies the double face of it: the public and the personal one. Hannah Arendt’s reflection on statelessness plays a paradigmatic role in this political and philosophical perspective on citizenship. Through Arendt’s analysis, the article tries to show the essential nature of the relationship between democracy and inclusive citizenshipapplication/pdf2539-22392389-8232https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/2628engSoft Powerhttps://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/download/2628/2437Núm. 9 , Año 2018 :Enero - Junio18491645Soft PowerAgier, M. (2008). On the Margins of the World. The Refugee Experience Today. Malden/MA: Politiy Press.Agier, M. (2011). Managing the Undesirables. Refugee Camps and Humanitarians Government. Cambridge: Polity Press.Andrews, G. (Ed.) (1991). Citizenship. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Arendt, H. (1972). On Violence. In Crisis of the Republic (pp. 103-198). San Diego-New York-London: Harcourt Brace & Co.Arendt, H. (1979). The Origin of Totalitarianism (new edition with added Prefaces). San Diego-New York-London: Harcourt Brace & Co.Arendt, H. (1998).The Human Condition (Introduction by M. Canovan (Ed.)). Chicago-London: Chicago University Press.Arendt, H. (2003). Was ist Politik?: Fragmente aus dem Nachlaß. München: Piper TaschenbuchBalibar, É. (2010). Arendt, le droit aux droits et la désobéissance civique. In La proposition de l’égaliberté (pp. 201-227). Paris: Puf.Barbelet, J. M. (1989). Citizenship. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Benhabib, S. (Ed.) (1996). Democracy and Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Birmingham, P. (2006). Hannah Arendt and Human Rights. The Predicament of Common Responsibility. New York: Indiana University Press.Brożek, B. (2013). Philosophy and Neuroscience. Three Modes of Interaction. In J. Stelmach, B. Brożek & Ł. Kurek (Eds.). Philosophy in Neuroscience. Krakow: Copernicus Center Press.Carens, J. H. (2013). The Ethics of Immigration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Castelfranchi, C. (2014). NeuroNorme: per un approccio non riduzionista. Cosa cercare e non cercare nel cervello. Rivista di filosofia del diritto, III, n.s.Castoriadis, C. (1975). L’institution imaginaire de la société. Paris: Le Seuil.Cohen, J. & Sabel, C. (1997, May). Directly-Deliberative Polyarchy. European Law Journal, 3(4), pp. 313-342.Cole, P. & Wellman, C. H. (2011). Debating the Ethics of Immigration. Is There a Right to Exclude? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Dworkin, R. (1993). Life’s Dominion. An Argument about Abortion, Euthanasia and Individual Freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Goldoni, M. & Maccorkindale, C. (2012) (Eds.). Hannah Arendt and the Law. Oxford-Portland/NY: Hart.Greblo, E. (2017). Luoghi a perdere. Hannah Arendt e la questione dei rifugiati. Scienza & Politica, 29(57), pp. 195-212.Dewey, J. (1954). The Public and its Problems. Chicago: Swallow Press.Habermas, J. (1992). Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge/MA: The MIT Press.Habermas, J. (1996). Three Normative Models of Democracy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and Difference (pp. 21-30). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Hayden, P. (2009). Political Evil in a Global Age. Hannah Arendt and International Theory. London: Routledge.Held, D. (1989). Political Theory and the Modern State. Essays on State, Power, and Democracy. London: Polity Press.Hume, D. (1748). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. II. 3. I. London: A. Millar.Iacoboni, M. (2008). I neuroni a specchio. Come capiamo ciò che fanno gli altri. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.Kant, I. (1785). Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. In AA. BD., Kants gesammelte Schriften. IV. 1904, II. (pp. 385-463). Berlin: Hrsg. Von der Koniglich Preusen, Kant, I. (1793). Über den Gemeinspruch: Das mag in der Theorie richtig sein, taugt aber nicht für die Praxis. In AA. BD. Kants gesammelte Schriften VIII, 1912, II. (pp. 273-314). Berlin: De Gruyter.Kant, I. (1797). Die Metaphysik der Sitten: Der Streit der Fakultäten. London: Forgotten Books (2018).Kelsen, H. (1929). The Essence and Value of Democracy. N. Urbinati and C. Invernizzi Accetti (Eds.) (2013). Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Klabbers, J. (2007, March). Possible Islands of Predictability. The Legal Thought of Hannah Arendt. Leiden Journal of International Law, 20(1), pp. 1-23.Lalatta Costerbosa, M. (2014). Democrazia assediata. Rome: DeriveApprodi.Lalatta Costerbosa, M. (Ed.) (2016). Lo spazio della responsabilità. Approdi e limiti delle neuroscienze. Bologna: il Mulino.La Torre, M. (2004). Cittadinanza e ordine politico. Diritti, cirsi della sovranità e sfera pubblica in una prospettiva europea. Torino: Giappichelli.La Torre, M. (2013). Hannah Arendt and the Concept of Law. Against the Tradition. Archiv für Rechts-und Sozialphilosophie, 99(3), pp. 400-416.Lukes, S. (1982). Relativism in Its Place. In S. Lukes & M. Hollis (Eds.), Rationality and Relativism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Macready, J. D. (2017). Hannah Arendt and the Fragility of Human Dignity. Lanham/MD: Lexington Books.McCabe, D. P. & Castel, A. D. (2008, April). Seeing Is Believing. The Effect of Brain Images on Judgements of Scientific Reasoning. Cognition. 107(1), pp. 343-352.McCabe, D. P. & Castel, A. D. & Rhodes, M. G. (2011). The Influence of FMRI Lie Detection Evidence on Juror Decision Making. Behavioural Sciences and Law, pp. 566-577.Mill, J. S. (2008). On Liberty and Other Essays. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press.Nedelsky, J. (2001). Judgment, Diversity, and Relational Autonomy. In R. Beiner & J. Nedelsky (Eds.), Judgment, Imagination, and Politics. Themes from Kant and Arendt (pp. 103-120). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Rizzato, M. & Donelli, D. (2011). Io sono il tuo specchio. Neuroni specchio ed empatia. Torino: Edizioni Amrita.Marina Lalatta Costerbosa - 2018info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/2628AutonomíaCiudadaníaArendtDemocraciaDesestatizaciónAutonomyCitizenshipArendtDemocracyStatelessnessDemocracy is inclusive : arendt’s paradigm.Democracy is inclusive : arendt’s paradigm.Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2466https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/f7003a68-1a9a-4175-9fd6-e253b7375399/download5d9702ddf9def6ecd02c6b6b978cf1f9MD5110983/29939oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/299392024-06-02 14:32:17.362https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Marina Lalatta Costerbosa - 2018https://repository.ucatolica.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaCbdigital@metabiblioteca.com

Democracy is inclusive : arendt’s paradigm.

Publicaciones similares