Construcción y evidencias de validez de una escala abreviada de autoinforme para evaluar el autoritarismo
A agressão autoritária, a submissão autoritária e o convencionalismo são crenças sociais ou atitudes que fazem parte do chamado “autoritarismo”. Este estudo apresenta a construção e análise das propriedades psicométricas de uma escala abreviada para avaliar tendências autoritárias, a Escala de Atitu...
- Autores:
-
Ávila-Batista, Ana Cristina
Rueda, Fabián J. M.
Hauck-Filho, Nelson
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2019
- Institución:
- Universidad Católica de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/23229
- Acceso en línea:
- https://hdl.handle.net/10983/23229
- Palabra clave:
- ANSIEDAD
INSATISFACCIÓN CORPORAL
UNIVERSITARIOS
GÉNERO
ANXIETY
BODY DISSATISFACTION
UNIVERSITY
GENDER
ANSIEDADE
INSATISFAÇÃO CORPORAL
UNIVERSITÁRIOS
GÊNERO
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2019
| id |
UCATOLICA2_df5a3bda178d438b2b5c9db1ea46ce02 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/23229 |
| network_acronym_str |
UCATOLICA2 |
| network_name_str |
RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Construcción y evidencias de validez de una escala abreviada de autoinforme para evaluar el autoritarismo |
| dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv |
Construction and validity evidence of a brief self-report scaleto assess authoritarianism |
| dc.title.translated.por.fl_str_mv |
Construção e evidências de validade de uma escala abreviada de autorrelato para avaliar o autoritarismo |
| title |
Construcción y evidencias de validez de una escala abreviada de autoinforme para evaluar el autoritarismo |
| spellingShingle |
Construcción y evidencias de validez de una escala abreviada de autoinforme para evaluar el autoritarismo ANSIEDAD INSATISFACCIÓN CORPORAL UNIVERSITARIOS GÉNERO ANXIETY BODY DISSATISFACTION UNIVERSITY GENDER ANSIEDADE INSATISFAÇÃO CORPORAL UNIVERSITÁRIOS GÊNERO |
| title_short |
Construcción y evidencias de validez de una escala abreviada de autoinforme para evaluar el autoritarismo |
| title_full |
Construcción y evidencias de validez de una escala abreviada de autoinforme para evaluar el autoritarismo |
| title_fullStr |
Construcción y evidencias de validez de una escala abreviada de autoinforme para evaluar el autoritarismo |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Construcción y evidencias de validez de una escala abreviada de autoinforme para evaluar el autoritarismo |
| title_sort |
Construcción y evidencias de validez de una escala abreviada de autoinforme para evaluar el autoritarismo |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Ávila-Batista, Ana Cristina Rueda, Fabián J. M. Hauck-Filho, Nelson |
| dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv |
Ávila-Batista, Ana Cristina Rueda, Fabián J. M. Hauck-Filho, Nelson |
| dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv |
ANSIEDAD INSATISFACCIÓN CORPORAL UNIVERSITARIOS GÉNERO ANXIETY BODY DISSATISFACTION UNIVERSITY GENDER ANSIEDADE INSATISFAÇÃO CORPORAL UNIVERSITÁRIOS GÊNERO |
| topic |
ANSIEDAD INSATISFACCIÓN CORPORAL UNIVERSITARIOS GÉNERO ANXIETY BODY DISSATISFACTION UNIVERSITY GENDER ANSIEDADE INSATISFAÇÃO CORPORAL UNIVERSITÁRIOS GÊNERO |
| description |
A agressão autoritária, a submissão autoritária e o convencionalismo são crenças sociais ou atitudes que fazem parte do chamado “autoritarismo”. Este estudo apresenta a construção e análise das propriedades psicométricas de uma escala abreviada para avaliar tendências autoritárias, a Escala de Atitudes ante o Autoritarismo (Escaut). No total, participaram 786 brasileiros adultos, entre os 18 e 75 anos, 70.7 % militares. Inicialmente, foram elaborados 42 itens para captar os principais tipos de crenças autoritárias, e os resultados das análises fatoriais ordinais permitiram reter 20 itens de moderados a altamente discriminatórios (cargas > .50) de dois fatores latentes: autoritarismo moral e punitivo (α = .88) e autoritarismo submisso (α = .89). As curvas de informação revelaram uma ampla cobertura da variável latente para ambas as subescalas. Inclusive, o instrumento foi capaz de discriminar participantes militares de não militares, com grandes efeitos para as diferenças entre os grupos. Em conclusão, a Escaut consiste numa escala abreviada de autorrelato que pode ser utilizada na pesquisa das principais atitudes autoritárias presentes na população em geral. Ao final do artigo, são discutidas as limitações deste estudo. |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| dc.date.accessioned.spa.fl_str_mv |
2019-06-18T16:24:39Z |
| dc.date.available.spa.fl_str_mv |
2019-06-18T16:24:39Z |
| dc.date.issued.spa.fl_str_mv |
2019-06 |
| dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de revista |
| dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
| dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv |
Text |
| dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART |
| dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.citation.spa.fl_str_mv |
Ávila-Batista, A., Rueda, F., & Hauck-Filho, N. (2019). Construcción y evidencias de validez de una escala abreviada de autoinforme para evaluar el autoritarismo. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 22(1), 31-51. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2019.22.1.3 |
| dc.identifier.issn.spa.fl_str_mv |
0123-9155 |
| dc.identifier.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/10983/23229 |
| identifier_str_mv |
Ávila-Batista, A., Rueda, F., & Hauck-Filho, N. (2019). Construcción y evidencias de validez de una escala abreviada de autoinforme para evaluar el autoritarismo. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 22(1), 31-51. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2019.22.1.3 0123-9155 |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10983/23229 |
| dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv |
Acta Colombiana de Psicología, Vol. 22 no. 1 (ene.-jun. 2019); p. 31-51 |
| dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv |
Adorno, T. H., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D., & Sanford, N. (1950). The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper. Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press. Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding Right-Wing Authoritarianism. San Diego, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers. Altemeyer, B. (1996). The Authoritarian Specter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Asún, R. A., Rdz-Navarro, K., & Alvarado, J. M. (2015). Developing Multidimensional Likert Scales Using Item Factor Analysis: The Case of Four-point Items. Sociological Methods & Research, 45(8), 744-749. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114566716. Barros, T. S., Torres, A. R. R., & Pereira, C. (2009). Psico-USF (Vol. 14 ). Universidade São Francisco. Recuperado de http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-82712009000100006. Brussino, S., & Etchezahar, E. (2013). Psychological perspectives in the study of authoritarianism. Journal of Alternative Perspectives in the Social Sciences, 5(3), 495-521. Recuperado de http://www.academia.edu/5869902/Psychological_perspectives_in_the_study_of_authoritarianism. Cárdenas, M., & Parra, L. (2011). Adaptación y validación de la Versión Abreviada de la Escala de Autoritarismos de Derechas (RWA) en una muestra chilena. Revista de Psicología, 19(1), 61-79. doi: https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-0581.2010.17098. Carlson, H., Thayer, R. E., & Germann, A. C. (1971). Social Attitudes and Personality Differences among Members of Two Kinds of Police Departments (Innovative vs. Traditional) and Students. The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 62(4), 564. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1141714. Diáz-Lázaro, C. M., Castañeras, C., Ledesma, R. D., S., V., & Rand, A. (2014). Right-Wing Authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, empathy, and materialistic value orientation as predictors of intergroup prejudice in Argentina. Salud & Sociedad, 5(3), 282-297. doi: https://doi.org/10.22199/S07187475.5014.0003.00004. Duckitt, J. (1993). Right-Wing Authoritarianism Among White South African Students: Its Measurement and Correlates. The Journal of Social Psychology, 133(4), 553-563. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1993.9712181. Duckitt, J., Bizumic, B., Krauss, S. W., & Heled, E. (2010). A Tripartite Approach to Right-Wing Authoritarianism: The Authoritarianism-Conservatism-Traditionalism Model. Political Psychology, 31(5), 685-715. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00781.x. Duncan, L. E., Peterson, B. E., & Winter, D. G. (1997). Authoritarianism and Gender Roles: Toward a Psychological Analysis of Hegemonic Relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(1), 41-49. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297231005. Dunwoody, P. T., & Funke, F. (2016). The Aggression-Submission-Conventionalism Scale: Testing a new three factor measure of authoritarianism. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 4(2), 571-600. doi: https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v4i2.168. Duriez, B., Klimstra, T. A., Luyckx, K., Beyers, W., & Soenens, B. (2012). Right-Wing Authoritarianism: Protective Factor Against or Risk Factor for Depression? European Journal of Personality, 26(5), 536-549. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ per.853. Dusso, A. (2017). Race and Right-Wing Authoritarianism: How Scoring High in Authoritarianism Does Not Necessarily Lead to Support for Right-Wing Candidates. Social Science Quarterly, 98(1), 244-260. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ ssqu.12302. Fromm, E. (1942). The fear of freedom. London: Routledge. Funke, F. (2005). The Dimensionality of Right-Wing Authori-tarianism: Lessons from the Dilemma between Theory and Measurement. Political Psychology, 26(2), 195-218. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00415.x. Gatto, J., Dambrun, M., Kerbrat, C., & De Oliveira, P. (2009). Prejudice in the police: On the processes underlying the effects of selection and group socialisation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 252-269. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.617. Gray, D., & Durrheim, K. (2013). Collective Rights and Personal Freedoms: A Discursive Analysis of Participant Accounts of Authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 34(4), 631-648. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00932.x. Gregurović, M., Kuti, S., & Župarić-Iljić, D. (2016). Attitudes towards Immigrant Workers and Asylum Seekers in Eastern Croatia: Dimensions, Determinants and Differences. Migracijske I Etničke Teme, 32(1), 91-122. doi: https://doi.org/10.11567/met.32.1.4. Holgado-Tello, F. P., Chacón-Moscoso, S., Barbero-García, I., & Vila-Abad, E. (2010). Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables. Quality & Quantity, 44(1), 153-166. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-008-9190-y. Johnson, M. K., Labouff, J. P., Rowatt, W. C., Patock-Peckham, J. A., & Carlisle, R. D. (2012). Facets of Right-Wing Authoritarianism Mediate the Relationship Between Religious Fundamentalism and Attitudes Toward Arabs and African Americans. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 51(1), 128-142. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5 906.2011.01622.x. Kruglanski, A. W., Jasko, K., Chernikova, M., Milyavsky, M., Babush, M., Baldner, C., & Pierro, A. (2015). The rocky road from attitudes to behaviors: Charting the goal systemic course of actions. Psychological Review, 122(4), 598-620. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039541. Kossowska, M., Bukowski, M., & Hiel, A. Van. (2008). The impact of submissive versus dominant authoritarianism and negative emotions on prejudice. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(8), 744-749. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.07.022. Laguna, L., Linn, A., Ward, K., & Rupslaukyte, R. (2010). An Examination of Authoritarian Personality Traits among Police Officers: The Role of Experience. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 25(2), 99-104. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-009-9060-0. Larsson, M. R., Björklund, F., & Bäckström, M. (2012). Rightwing authoritarianism is a risk factor of torture-like abuse, but so is social dominance orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(7), 927-929. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.06.015. Laythe, B., Finkel, D., & Kirkpatrick, L. A. (2001). Predicting Prejudice from Religious Fundamentalism and Right-Wing Authoritarianism: A Multiple-Regression Approach. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40(1), 1-10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/0021-8294.00033. Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2013). FACTOR 9.2: A Comprehensive Program for Fitting Exploratory and Semiconfirmatory Factor Analysis and IRT Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37(6), 497-498. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621613487794. Lorenzo-Seva, U., Timmerman, M. E., & Kiers, H. A. L. (2011). The Hull Method for Selecting the Number of Common Factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(2), 340-364. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.564527. Manganelli Rattazzi, A. M., Bobbio, A., & Canova, L. (2007). A short version of the Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(5), 12231234. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.03.013. Manoussaki, K., & Veitch, F. (2015). Ambivalent Sexism, Right Wing Authoritarianism and Rape Myth Acceptance in Scotland. International Journal of Gender & Women’s Studies, 3(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.15640/ijgws.v3n1a9. Mavor, K. I., Louis, W. R., & Sibley, C. G. (2010). A bias-corrected exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of right-wing authoritarianism: Support for a three-factor structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(1), 28-33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.08.006. McFarland, S. G., Ageyev, V. S., & Abalakina-Paap, M. A. (1992). Authoritarianism in the former Soviet Union. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(6), 10041010. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.6.1004. Moghaddam, F. M., & Vuksanovic, V. (1990). Attitudes and Behavior Toward Human Rights Across Different Contexts the Role of Right-Wing Authoritarianism, Political Ideology, and Religiosity. International Journal of Psychology, 25(2), 455-474. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207599008247877. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide.(7. ª Ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén. Nuñes-Alacón, M., Moreno-Jiménez, M. P., & Moral-Toranzo. (2011). Modelo causal del prejuicio religioso. Anales de Psicologia, 27(3), 852-861. Onraet, E., & van Hiel, A. (2014). Are Right-Wing Adherents Mentally Troubled? Recent Insights on the Relationship of Right-Wing Attitudes With Threat and Psychological IllBeing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(1), 35-40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413514249. Pasquali, L. (2010). Instrumentação psicológica: fundamentos e práticas. Porto Alegre: Artmed. Perrott, S. B., & Taylor, D. M. (1995). Attitudinal Differences Between Police Constables and Their Supervisors. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 22(3), 326-339. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854895022003009. Rubinstein, G. (2006). Authoritarianism Among Border Police Officers, Career Soldiers, and Airport Security Guards at the Israeli Border. The Journal of Social Psychology, 146(6), 751-761. doi: https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.146.6.751-761. Seoane, J., & Garzón, A. (1992). Creencias sociales contemporáneas, autoritarismo y humanismo. Psicología Política, 5, 27-52. Recuperado de https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2826354. Timmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 209-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023353. Van Hiel, A., & De Clercq, B. (2009). Authoritarianism is good for you: Right-wing authoritarianism as a buffering factor for mental distress. European Journal of Personality, 23(1), 33-50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.702. Velicer, W. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41(3), 321-327. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293557. Walker, W. D., Rowe, R. C., & Quinsey, V. L. (1993). Authoritarianism and sexual aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(5), 1036-1045. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.1036. Worden, R. E. (1995). Police officers’ belief systems: a framework for analysis. American Journal of Police, 14(1), 4981. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/07358549510152979. Zakrisson, I. (2005). Construction of a short version of the Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(5), 863-872. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.026. |
| dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv |
Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2019 |
| dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.rights.creativecommons.spa.fl_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) |
| dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2019 Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Católica de Colombia. Facultad de Psicología |
| institution |
Universidad Católica de Colombia |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/d7a7d41b-0ccb-45b3-a8b5-e8fc327f400b/download https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/2c5b4786-9214-4146-90d7-ff2fd06f7d6c/download https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/d9b41e20-3e1f-4e3c-9095-a15060b20105/download https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/cfba1b66-ed2d-4237-a5c7-0266d1063731/download https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/121d8b68-7a1b-4d12-8f1b-caf40338a0ce/download https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/8409c3c8-2579-47ff-9746-83c171327bab/download |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
4f15ce675c4167b344f61c047eb7f2bd 3caa8c38c8ad08f0bcd4db8d0651f4ff 8057b1c1caf316f4d091a426ce0333e6 90c614f5eb647bc1f09a1ae36d6109e4 0006d31f110b00a5c76c8b26c6a8908f aab7ec9357452104c1492e2ba19394c4 |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaC |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdigital@metabiblioteca.com |
| _version_ |
1808402549853650944 |
| spelling |
Ávila-Batista, Ana Cristinaba0fec7c-f0cd-40fb-9f22-cd1f7ad0f7de-1Rueda, Fabián J. M.59ad1984-95a3-44de-b0e8-8c9e3138fc39-1Hauck-Filho, Nelsonb05a276e-197f-4b43-a541-f40c65cb9b5c-12019-06-18T16:24:39Z2019-06-18T16:24:39Z2019-06A agressão autoritária, a submissão autoritária e o convencionalismo são crenças sociais ou atitudes que fazem parte do chamado “autoritarismo”. Este estudo apresenta a construção e análise das propriedades psicométricas de uma escala abreviada para avaliar tendências autoritárias, a Escala de Atitudes ante o Autoritarismo (Escaut). No total, participaram 786 brasileiros adultos, entre os 18 e 75 anos, 70.7 % militares. Inicialmente, foram elaborados 42 itens para captar os principais tipos de crenças autoritárias, e os resultados das análises fatoriais ordinais permitiram reter 20 itens de moderados a altamente discriminatórios (cargas > .50) de dois fatores latentes: autoritarismo moral e punitivo (α = .88) e autoritarismo submisso (α = .89). As curvas de informação revelaram uma ampla cobertura da variável latente para ambas as subescalas. Inclusive, o instrumento foi capaz de discriminar participantes militares de não militares, com grandes efeitos para as diferenças entre os grupos. Em conclusão, a Escaut consiste numa escala abreviada de autorrelato que pode ser utilizada na pesquisa das principais atitudes autoritárias presentes na população em geral. Ao final do artigo, são discutidas as limitações deste estudo.La agresión autoritaria, la sumisión autoritaria y el convencionalismo son creencias sociales o actitudes que forman parte del llamado autoritarismo. El presente estudio da cuenta de la construcción y análisis de las propiedades psicométricas de una escala abreviada para evaluar tendencias autoritarias, la Escala de Actitudes frente al Autoritarismo (ESCAUT). En total, participaron 786 brasileños adultos con edades entre los 18 y 75 años, el 70.7 % eran militares. Inicialmente, se elaboraron 42 ítems para captar los principales tipos de creencias autoritarias, y los resultados de los análisis factoriales ordinales permitieron retener 20 ítems de moderados a altamente discriminatorios (cargas > .50) de dos factores latentes: autoritarismo moral y punitivo (α = .88) y autoritarismo sumiso (α = .89). Las curvas de información revelaron una amplia cobertura de la variable latente para ambas subescalas. Incluso, el instrumento fue capaz de discriminar participantes militares de no militares, con grandes efectos para las diferencias entre los grupos. En conclusión, la ESCAUT consiste en una escala abreviada de autoinforme que puede ser utilizada en la investigación de las principales actitudes autoritarias presentes en la población general. Al final se discuten las limitaciones del estudio.Authoritarian aggression, authoritarian submission, and conventionalism comprise beliefs or attitudes know as authoritarianism. In the present study, we report on the development and the test of the psychometric properties of a brief scale for the assessment of authoritarian tendencies, the Attitudes toward Authoritarianism Scale (ESCAUT). Participants in the study were 786 adults with ages ranging from 18 to 75 years, 70.7 % military. An initial pool of 42 items written to capture the core features of authoritarianism was evaluated by specialists, and then answered by the participants. Results from ordinal factor analysis indicated 20 items with moderately to highly discriminative (factor loadings > .50) of two latent factors: Moral and punitive authoritarianism (α = .88), and submissive authoritarianism (α = .89). Test information curves revealed a broad coverage of the latent trait in both subscales. Moreover, the instrument could discriminate military from non-military participants, with large size differences. The ESCAUT is a brief self-report scale recommended for the assessment of the main features of authoritarianism in the general Latin American population. Limitations of the study are addressed.application/pdfÁvila-Batista, A., Rueda, F., & Hauck-Filho, N. (2019). Construcción y evidencias de validez de una escala abreviada de autoinforme para evaluar el autoritarismo. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 22(1), 31-51. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2019.22.1.30123-9155https://hdl.handle.net/10983/23229spaUniversidad Católica de Colombia. Facultad de PsicologíaActa Colombiana de Psicología, Vol. 22 no. 1 (ene.-jun. 2019); p. 31-51Adorno, T. H., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D., & Sanford, N. (1950). The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper.Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding Right-Wing Authoritarianism. San Diego, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers.Altemeyer, B. (1996). The Authoritarian Specter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Asún, R. A., Rdz-Navarro, K., & Alvarado, J. M. (2015). Developing Multidimensional Likert Scales Using Item Factor Analysis: The Case of Four-point Items. Sociological Methods & Research, 45(8), 744-749. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114566716.Barros, T. S., Torres, A. R. R., & Pereira, C. (2009). Psico-USF (Vol. 14 ). Universidade São Francisco. Recuperado de http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-82712009000100006.Brussino, S., & Etchezahar, E. (2013). Psychological perspectives in the study of authoritarianism. Journal of Alternative Perspectives in the Social Sciences, 5(3), 495-521. Recuperado de http://www.academia.edu/5869902/Psychological_perspectives_in_the_study_of_authoritarianism.Cárdenas, M., & Parra, L. (2011). Adaptación y validación de la Versión Abreviada de la Escala de Autoritarismos de Derechas (RWA) en una muestra chilena. Revista de Psicología, 19(1), 61-79. doi: https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-0581.2010.17098.Carlson, H., Thayer, R. E., & Germann, A. C. (1971). Social Attitudes and Personality Differences among Members of Two Kinds of Police Departments (Innovative vs. Traditional) and Students. The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 62(4), 564. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1141714.Diáz-Lázaro, C. M., Castañeras, C., Ledesma, R. D., S., V., & Rand, A. (2014). Right-Wing Authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, empathy, and materialistic value orientation as predictors of intergroup prejudice in Argentina. Salud & Sociedad, 5(3), 282-297. doi: https://doi.org/10.22199/S07187475.5014.0003.00004.Duckitt, J. (1993). Right-Wing Authoritarianism Among White South African Students: Its Measurement and Correlates. The Journal of Social Psychology, 133(4), 553-563. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1993.9712181.Duckitt, J., Bizumic, B., Krauss, S. W., & Heled, E. (2010). A Tripartite Approach to Right-Wing Authoritarianism: The Authoritarianism-Conservatism-Traditionalism Model. Political Psychology, 31(5), 685-715. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00781.x.Duncan, L. E., Peterson, B. E., & Winter, D. G. (1997). Authoritarianism and Gender Roles: Toward a Psychological Analysis of Hegemonic Relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(1), 41-49. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297231005.Dunwoody, P. T., & Funke, F. (2016). The Aggression-Submission-Conventionalism Scale: Testing a new three factor measure of authoritarianism. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 4(2), 571-600. doi: https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v4i2.168.Duriez, B., Klimstra, T. A., Luyckx, K., Beyers, W., & Soenens, B. (2012). Right-Wing Authoritarianism: Protective Factor Against or Risk Factor for Depression? European Journal of Personality, 26(5), 536-549. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ per.853.Dusso, A. (2017). Race and Right-Wing Authoritarianism: How Scoring High in Authoritarianism Does Not Necessarily Lead to Support for Right-Wing Candidates. Social Science Quarterly, 98(1), 244-260. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ ssqu.12302.Fromm, E. (1942). The fear of freedom. London: Routledge.Funke, F. (2005). The Dimensionality of Right-Wing Authori-tarianism: Lessons from the Dilemma between Theory and Measurement. Political Psychology, 26(2), 195-218. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00415.x.Gatto, J., Dambrun, M., Kerbrat, C., & De Oliveira, P. (2009). Prejudice in the police: On the processes underlying the effects of selection and group socialisation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 252-269. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.617.Gray, D., & Durrheim, K. (2013). Collective Rights and Personal Freedoms: A Discursive Analysis of Participant Accounts of Authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 34(4), 631-648. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00932.x.Gregurović, M., Kuti, S., & Župarić-Iljić, D. (2016). Attitudes towards Immigrant Workers and Asylum Seekers in Eastern Croatia: Dimensions, Determinants and Differences. Migracijske I Etničke Teme, 32(1), 91-122. doi: https://doi.org/10.11567/met.32.1.4.Holgado-Tello, F. P., Chacón-Moscoso, S., Barbero-García, I., & Vila-Abad, E. (2010). Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables. Quality & Quantity, 44(1), 153-166. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-008-9190-y.Johnson, M. K., Labouff, J. P., Rowatt, W. C., Patock-Peckham, J. A., & Carlisle, R. D. (2012). Facets of Right-Wing Authoritarianism Mediate the Relationship Between Religious Fundamentalism and Attitudes Toward Arabs and African Americans. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 51(1), 128-142. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5 906.2011.01622.x.Kruglanski, A. W., Jasko, K., Chernikova, M., Milyavsky, M., Babush, M., Baldner, C., & Pierro, A. (2015). The rocky road from attitudes to behaviors: Charting the goal systemic course of actions. Psychological Review, 122(4), 598-620. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039541.Kossowska, M., Bukowski, M., & Hiel, A. Van. (2008). The impact of submissive versus dominant authoritarianism and negative emotions on prejudice. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(8), 744-749. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.07.022.Laguna, L., Linn, A., Ward, K., & Rupslaukyte, R. (2010). An Examination of Authoritarian Personality Traits among Police Officers: The Role of Experience. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 25(2), 99-104. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-009-9060-0.Larsson, M. R., Björklund, F., & Bäckström, M. (2012). Rightwing authoritarianism is a risk factor of torture-like abuse, but so is social dominance orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(7), 927-929. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.06.015.Laythe, B., Finkel, D., & Kirkpatrick, L. A. (2001). Predicting Prejudice from Religious Fundamentalism and Right-Wing Authoritarianism: A Multiple-Regression Approach. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40(1), 1-10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/0021-8294.00033.Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2013). FACTOR 9.2: A Comprehensive Program for Fitting Exploratory and Semiconfirmatory Factor Analysis and IRT Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37(6), 497-498. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621613487794.Lorenzo-Seva, U., Timmerman, M. E., & Kiers, H. A. L. (2011). The Hull Method for Selecting the Number of Common Factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(2), 340-364. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.564527.Manganelli Rattazzi, A. M., Bobbio, A., & Canova, L. (2007). A short version of the Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(5), 12231234. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.03.013.Manoussaki, K., & Veitch, F. (2015). Ambivalent Sexism, Right Wing Authoritarianism and Rape Myth Acceptance in Scotland. International Journal of Gender & Women’s Studies, 3(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.15640/ijgws.v3n1a9.Mavor, K. I., Louis, W. R., & Sibley, C. G. (2010). A bias-corrected exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of right-wing authoritarianism: Support for a three-factor structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(1), 28-33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.08.006.McFarland, S. G., Ageyev, V. S., & Abalakina-Paap, M. A. (1992). Authoritarianism in the former Soviet Union. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(6), 10041010. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.6.1004.Moghaddam, F. M., & Vuksanovic, V. (1990). Attitudes and Behavior Toward Human Rights Across Different Contexts the Role of Right-Wing Authoritarianism, Political Ideology, and Religiosity. International Journal of Psychology, 25(2), 455-474. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207599008247877.Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide.(7. ª Ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Nuñes-Alacón, M., Moreno-Jiménez, M. P., & Moral-Toranzo. (2011). Modelo causal del prejuicio religioso. Anales de Psicologia, 27(3), 852-861.Onraet, E., & van Hiel, A. (2014). Are Right-Wing Adherents Mentally Troubled? Recent Insights on the Relationship of Right-Wing Attitudes With Threat and Psychological IllBeing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(1), 35-40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413514249.Pasquali, L. (2010). Instrumentação psicológica: fundamentos e práticas. Porto Alegre: Artmed.Perrott, S. B., & Taylor, D. M. (1995). Attitudinal Differences Between Police Constables and Their Supervisors. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 22(3), 326-339. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854895022003009.Rubinstein, G. (2006). Authoritarianism Among Border Police Officers, Career Soldiers, and Airport Security Guards at the Israeli Border. The Journal of Social Psychology, 146(6), 751-761. doi: https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.146.6.751-761.Seoane, J., & Garzón, A. (1992). Creencias sociales contemporáneas, autoritarismo y humanismo. Psicología Política, 5, 27-52. Recuperado de https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2826354.Timmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 209-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023353.Van Hiel, A., & De Clercq, B. (2009). Authoritarianism is good for you: Right-wing authoritarianism as a buffering factor for mental distress. European Journal of Personality, 23(1), 33-50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.702.Velicer, W. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41(3), 321-327. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293557.Walker, W. D., Rowe, R. C., & Quinsey, V. L. (1993). Authoritarianism and sexual aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(5), 1036-1045. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.1036.Worden, R. E. (1995). Police officers’ belief systems: a framework for analysis. American Journal of Police, 14(1), 4981. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/07358549510152979.Zakrisson, I. (2005). Construction of a short version of the Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(5), 863-872. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.026.Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2019info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2ANSIEDADINSATISFACCIÓN CORPORALUNIVERSITARIOSGÉNEROANXIETYBODY DISSATISFACTIONUNIVERSITYGENDERANSIEDADEINSATISFAÇÃO CORPORALUNIVERSITÁRIOSGÊNEROConstrucción y evidencias de validez de una escala abreviada de autoinforme para evaluar el autoritarismoConstruction and validity evidence of a brief self-report scaleto assess authoritarianismConstrução e evidências de validade de uma escala abreviada de autorrelato para avaliar o autoritarismoArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85PublicationORIGINAL1617-14633-1-PB.pdf1617-14633-1-PB.pdfArticulo principalapplication/pdf989129https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/d7a7d41b-0ccb-45b3-a8b5-e8fc327f400b/download4f15ce675c4167b344f61c047eb7f2bdMD511617-14634-2-PB.pdf1617-14634-2-PB.pdfArticulo principalapplication/pdf985565https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/2c5b4786-9214-4146-90d7-ff2fd06f7d6c/download3caa8c38c8ad08f0bcd4db8d0651f4ffMD52TEXT1617-14633-1-PB.pdf.txt1617-14633-1-PB.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain51663https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/d9b41e20-3e1f-4e3c-9095-a15060b20105/download8057b1c1caf316f4d091a426ce0333e6MD531617-14634-2-PB.pdf.txt1617-14634-2-PB.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain48174https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/cfba1b66-ed2d-4237-a5c7-0266d1063731/download90c614f5eb647bc1f09a1ae36d6109e4MD55THUMBNAIL1617-14633-1-PB.pdf.jpg1617-14633-1-PB.pdf.jpgRIUCACimage/jpeg22708https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/121d8b68-7a1b-4d12-8f1b-caf40338a0ce/download0006d31f110b00a5c76c8b26c6a8908fMD541617-14634-2-PB.pdf.jpg1617-14634-2-PB.pdf.jpgRIUCACimage/jpeg22509https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/8409c3c8-2579-47ff-9746-83c171327bab/downloadaab7ec9357452104c1492e2ba19394c4MD5610983/23229oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/232292023-03-24 16:01:57.998https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2019https://repository.ucatolica.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaCbdigital@metabiblioteca.com |