Joy to the world : the satisfaction of post-truth.

Este artículo tiene como objetivo descubrir las precondiciones y características clave de la posverdad, así como los factores contextuales que explican su atractivo. El factor clave parece ser la capacidad de la posverdad para incitar al placer, tanto en el sentido de no estar restringida por la ver...

Full description

Autores:
Kalpokas , Ignas
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2019
Institución:
Universidad Católica de Colombia
Repositorio:
RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/29970
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.14718/SoftPower.2019.6.2.2
Palabra clave:
Posverdad
Big-data
Placer
Afecto
Post-truth
Big-data
Pleasure
Affect
Rights
openAccess
License
Ignas Kalpokas - 2019
id UCATOLICA2_d49b8565a6910f95876caa201bd14924
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/29970
network_acronym_str UCATOLICA2
network_name_str RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Joy to the world : the satisfaction of post-truth.
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv Joy to the world : the satisfaction of post-truth.
title Joy to the world : the satisfaction of post-truth.
spellingShingle Joy to the world : the satisfaction of post-truth.
Posverdad
Big-data
Placer
Afecto
Post-truth
Big-data
Pleasure
Affect
title_short Joy to the world : the satisfaction of post-truth.
title_full Joy to the world : the satisfaction of post-truth.
title_fullStr Joy to the world : the satisfaction of post-truth.
title_full_unstemmed Joy to the world : the satisfaction of post-truth.
title_sort Joy to the world : the satisfaction of post-truth.
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Kalpokas , Ignas
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Kalpokas , Ignas
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv Posverdad
Big-data
Placer
Afecto
topic Posverdad
Big-data
Placer
Afecto
Post-truth
Big-data
Pleasure
Affect
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Post-truth
Big-data
Pleasure
Affect
description Este artículo tiene como objetivo descubrir las precondiciones y características clave de la posverdad, así como los factores contextuales que explican su atractivo. El factor clave parece ser la capacidad de la posverdad para incitar al placer, tanto en el sentido de no estar restringida por la veracidad, como de avance y capacidad de saber cuáles son las variables necesarias que incitan al placer a través del análisis de los big data. Eso se corresponde perfectamente al ascenso general del peso de la satisfacción y movilización afectiva en la competición por atención cada vez más escasa de la audiencia, lo que hace de la posverdad un fenómeno claramente contemporáneo.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2019-07-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2019-07-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2019-07-01
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.eng.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.eng.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.eng.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.driver.eng.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv Journal article
dc.type.redcol.eng.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
dc.type.version.eng.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.14718/SoftPower.2019.6.2.2
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 2539-2239
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 2389-8232
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.14718/SoftPower.2019.6.2.2
identifier_str_mv 10.14718/SoftPower.2019.6.2.2
2539-2239
2389-8232
url https://doi.org/10.14718/SoftPower.2019.6.2.2
dc.language.iso.eng.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/download/3560/3260
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv Núm. 12 , Año 2019 :Julio - Diciembre
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv 35
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv 12
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv 16
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv 6
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv Soft Power
dc.relation.references.eng.fl_str_mv Balazs, J. A. & Velásquez, J. D. (2016). Opinion Mining and Information Fusion: A Survey. Information Fusion, 27, 95-110.
Bennett, W. L. & Pfetsch, B. (2018). Rethinking Political Communication in a Time of Disrupted Public Spheres. Journal of Communication, 68, 243-253.
Bennett, W. L. & Segerberg, A. (2012). The Logic of Connective Action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739-768.
Chandler, D. (2015). A World Without Causation: Big Data and the Coming of Age of Posthumanism. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 43(3), 833-851.
Coleman, R. (2018). Social Media and the Materialisation of the Affective Present. In T. D. Sampson, S. Maddison and D. Ellis (eds.) Affect and Social Media: Emotion, Mediation, Anxiety and Contagion (pp. 67-75). London and Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Couldry, N. and Hepp. A, (2017). The Mediated Construction of Reality. Cambridge and Malden: Polity
Dahlgren, P. & Alvares, C. (2013). Political Participation in an Age of Mediatization. Javnost – The Public, 20(2), 47-65.
Damasio, A. (2018). The Strange Order of Things: Life, Feeling, and the Making of Cultures. New York: Pantheon Books.
Davis, E. (2017). Post-Truth: Why We Have Reached Peak Bullshit and What We Can Do About It. London: Little, Brown.
de Haan, T. & Linde, J. (2018). ‘Good Nudge Lullaby’: choice Architecture and Default Bias Reinforcement. The Economic Journal, 128, 1180-1206.
Dean, J. (2017). Politicising Fandom. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19(2), 408-424.
Döveling, K., Harju, H. A. & Sommer, D. (2018). From Mediatized Emotion to Digital Affect Cultures: New Technologies and Global Flows of Emotion. Social Media + Society, doi: 10.1177/2056305117743141.
Ecker, U. K. H. (2018). Why Rebuttals May Not Work: The Psychology of Misinformation. Media Asia, 44(2): 79-87.
Faraj, S., Pachidi, S. & Sayegh, K. (2018). Working and Organizing in the Age of the Learning Algorithm. Information and Organization, 28, 62-70.
Franks D. D. (2014). Emotions and Neurosociology. In J. E. Stets and J. E. Turner (Eds.). Handbook of the Sociology of Emotions (vol. 2) (pp. 267-281). New York: Springer.
Giatsoglou, M. et al. (2017). Sentiment Analysis Leveraging Emotions and Word Embeddings. Expert Systems with Applications, 69, 214-224.
Golf-Papez, M. & Veer, E. (2017). Don’t Feed the Trolling: Rethinking How Online Trolling Is Being Defined and Combated. Journal of Marketing Management, 33 (15-16), 1336-1354.
Hannan, J. (2018). Trolling Ourselves to Death? Social Media and Post-truth Politics. European Journal of Communication, 33(2): 214-226.
Harsin, J. (2015). Regimes of Posttruth, Postpolitics, and Attention Economies. Communication, Culture & Critique, 8, 327-333.
Hauser, M. (2018). Metapopulism in-between Democracy and Populism: Transformations of Laclau’s Concept of Populism with Trump and Putin. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 19(1), 68-87.
Hjarvard, S. (2008). The Mediatization of Society: A Theory of the Media as Agents of Social and Cultural Change. Nordicom Review, 29(2), 105-134.
______ (2014). From Bricks to Bytes: The Mediatization of a Global Toy Industry. In I. Bondebjerg and P. Golding (Eds.). European Culture and the Media (pp. 43-64). Bristol: Intellect Books.
Holmstrom, M. (2015). The Narrative and Social Media. Defence Strategic Communications, 1(1), 119-133.
Just, N. & Latzer, M. (2017). Governance by Algorithms: Reality Construction by Algorithmic Selection in the Internet. Media, Culture & Society, 39(2): 238-258.
Kalpokas, I. (2019). A Political Theory of Post-Truth. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kemper, J. & Kolkman, D. (2018). Transparent to Whom? No Algorithmic Accountability Without a Critical Audience. Information, Communication & Society, doi:10.1080/1369118X.2018.1477967.
Lazzarato, M. (2014). Signs and Machines: Capitalism and the Production of Subjectivity. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e). Lury, C. & Wakeford, N. (2012). Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social. London and New York: Routledge.
Marcinkowski, F. (2014). Mediatisation of Politics: Reflections on the State of the Concept. Javnost – The Public, 21(2), 5-22.
Markwica, R. (2018). Emotional Choices: How the Logic of Affect Shapes Coercive Diplomacy. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Mazzoleni, G. (2017). Changes in Contemporary Communication Ecosystems Ask for a ‘New Look’ at the Concept of Mediatisation. Javnost – The Public, 24(2), 136-145.
McGranahan, C. (2017). An Anthropology of Lying: Trump and the Political Sociality of Moral Outrage. American Ethnologist, 44(2), 243-248.
McIntyre, L. C. (2018). Post-Truth. Cambridge (MA) and London: The MIT Press.
Miller, J. (2014). The Fourth Screen: Mediatization and the Smartphone. Mobile Media and Communication, 2(2), 209-226.
Müller, O. et. al. (2016). Utilizing Big Data Analytics for Information Systems Research: Challenges, Promises and Guidelines. European Journal of Information Systems, 25(4), 289-302.
Noon Nave, N., Shifman, L. & Tenenboim-Weinblatt, K. (2018). Talking it Personally: Features of Successful Political Posts on Facebook. Social Media + Society. doi: 10.1177/2056305118784771.
Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Papsdorf, C. (2015). How the Internet Automates Communication. Information, Communication & Society, 18(9), 991-1005.
Perel, M. (2017). Black Box Tinkering: Beyond Disclosure in Algorithmic Enforcement. Florida Law Review, 69(1), 181-221.
Puschmann, C. & Powell, A. (2018). Turning Words into Consumer Preferences: How Sentiment Analysis is Framed in Research and the News Media. Social Media + Society, doi: 10.1177/2056305118797724.
Roselle, L., Miskimmon, A. & O’Loughlin, B. (2014). Strategic Narrative: A New Means to Understand Soft Power. Media, War & Conclict, 7(1), 70-84.
Sanfilippo, M. R., Fichman, P. and Yang, S. (2018). Multidimensionality of Online Trolling Behaviors. The Information Society, 34(1), 27-39.
Sicart, M. (2014). Play Matters. Cambridge (MA) and London: The MIT Press.
Strengers, Y. & Nicholls, L. (2018). Aesthetic Pleasures and Gendered Tech-Work in the 21st-Century Smart Home. Media International Australia, 166(1), 70-80.
Strömbäck, J. & Van Aelst, P. (2013). Why Political Parties Adapt to the Media: Exploring the Fourth Dimension of Mediatization. The International Communication Gazette, 75(4), 341-358.
Vaidhyanathan, S. (2018). Anti-Social Media: Hoe Facebook Disconnects Us and Undermines Democracy. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Von Scheve, C. (2018). A Social Relational Account of Affect. European Journal of Social Theory, 21(1): 39-59.
Yeung, K. (2017) ‘Hypernudge’: Big Data as a Mode of Regulation by Design. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 118-136.
dc.rights.eng.fl_str_mv Ignas Kalpokas - 2019
dc.rights.accessrights.eng.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.eng.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.eng.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv Ignas Kalpokas - 2019
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.eng.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Soft Power
dc.source.eng.fl_str_mv https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/3560
institution Universidad Católica de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/cda9c387-2509-4b99-b4bc-7adec5d4a91a/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 06695d80df6d2a08b50703bed08ecea5
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_ 1828173527888429056
spelling Kalpokas , Ignas6c0d83ce-a343-456d-99fd-8ac493a27e093002019-07-01T00:00:00Z2019-07-01T00:00:00Z2019-07-01Este artículo tiene como objetivo descubrir las precondiciones y características clave de la posverdad, así como los factores contextuales que explican su atractivo. El factor clave parece ser la capacidad de la posverdad para incitar al placer, tanto en el sentido de no estar restringida por la veracidad, como de avance y capacidad de saber cuáles son las variables necesarias que incitan al placer a través del análisis de los big data. Eso se corresponde perfectamente al ascenso general del peso de la satisfacción y movilización afectiva en la competición por atención cada vez más escasa de la audiencia, lo que hace de la posverdad un fenómeno claramente contemporáneo.This article aims to uncover the key preconditions and characteristics of post-truth as well as the contextual factors explaining its appeal. The key factor appears to be posttruth’s ability to incite pleasure, in terms of both it being unconstrained by veracity and the advance and the capacity to know what the necessary pleasure-inciting variables are through big data analysis. That neatly corresponds with the general rise to prominence of satisfaction and affective mobilisation in competition over increasingly scarce audience attention, making post-truth a distinctly contemporary phenomenon.application/pdf10.14718/SoftPower.2019.6.2.22539-22392389-8232https://doi.org/10.14718/SoftPower.2019.6.2.2engSoft Powerhttps://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/download/3560/3260Núm. 12 , Año 2019 :Julio - Diciembre3512166Soft PowerBalazs, J. A. & Velásquez, J. D. (2016). Opinion Mining and Information Fusion: A Survey. Information Fusion, 27, 95-110.Bennett, W. L. & Pfetsch, B. (2018). Rethinking Political Communication in a Time of Disrupted Public Spheres. Journal of Communication, 68, 243-253.Bennett, W. L. & Segerberg, A. (2012). The Logic of Connective Action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739-768.Chandler, D. (2015). A World Without Causation: Big Data and the Coming of Age of Posthumanism. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 43(3), 833-851.Coleman, R. (2018). Social Media and the Materialisation of the Affective Present. In T. D. Sampson, S. Maddison and D. Ellis (eds.) Affect and Social Media: Emotion, Mediation, Anxiety and Contagion (pp. 67-75). London and Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Couldry, N. and Hepp. A, (2017). The Mediated Construction of Reality. Cambridge and Malden: PolityDahlgren, P. & Alvares, C. (2013). Political Participation in an Age of Mediatization. Javnost – The Public, 20(2), 47-65.Damasio, A. (2018). The Strange Order of Things: Life, Feeling, and the Making of Cultures. New York: Pantheon Books.Davis, E. (2017). Post-Truth: Why We Have Reached Peak Bullshit and What We Can Do About It. London: Little, Brown.de Haan, T. & Linde, J. (2018). ‘Good Nudge Lullaby’: choice Architecture and Default Bias Reinforcement. The Economic Journal, 128, 1180-1206.Dean, J. (2017). Politicising Fandom. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19(2), 408-424.Döveling, K., Harju, H. A. & Sommer, D. (2018). From Mediatized Emotion to Digital Affect Cultures: New Technologies and Global Flows of Emotion. Social Media + Society, doi: 10.1177/2056305117743141.Ecker, U. K. H. (2018). Why Rebuttals May Not Work: The Psychology of Misinformation. Media Asia, 44(2): 79-87.Faraj, S., Pachidi, S. & Sayegh, K. (2018). Working and Organizing in the Age of the Learning Algorithm. Information and Organization, 28, 62-70.Franks D. D. (2014). Emotions and Neurosociology. In J. E. Stets and J. E. Turner (Eds.). Handbook of the Sociology of Emotions (vol. 2) (pp. 267-281). New York: Springer.Giatsoglou, M. et al. (2017). Sentiment Analysis Leveraging Emotions and Word Embeddings. Expert Systems with Applications, 69, 214-224.Golf-Papez, M. & Veer, E. (2017). Don’t Feed the Trolling: Rethinking How Online Trolling Is Being Defined and Combated. Journal of Marketing Management, 33 (15-16), 1336-1354.Hannan, J. (2018). Trolling Ourselves to Death? Social Media and Post-truth Politics. European Journal of Communication, 33(2): 214-226.Harsin, J. (2015). Regimes of Posttruth, Postpolitics, and Attention Economies. Communication, Culture & Critique, 8, 327-333.Hauser, M. (2018). Metapopulism in-between Democracy and Populism: Transformations of Laclau’s Concept of Populism with Trump and Putin. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 19(1), 68-87.Hjarvard, S. (2008). The Mediatization of Society: A Theory of the Media as Agents of Social and Cultural Change. Nordicom Review, 29(2), 105-134.______ (2014). From Bricks to Bytes: The Mediatization of a Global Toy Industry. In I. Bondebjerg and P. Golding (Eds.). European Culture and the Media (pp. 43-64). Bristol: Intellect Books.Holmstrom, M. (2015). The Narrative and Social Media. Defence Strategic Communications, 1(1), 119-133.Just, N. & Latzer, M. (2017). Governance by Algorithms: Reality Construction by Algorithmic Selection in the Internet. Media, Culture & Society, 39(2): 238-258.Kalpokas, I. (2019). A Political Theory of Post-Truth. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Kemper, J. & Kolkman, D. (2018). Transparent to Whom? No Algorithmic Accountability Without a Critical Audience. Information, Communication & Society, doi:10.1080/1369118X.2018.1477967.Lazzarato, M. (2014). Signs and Machines: Capitalism and the Production of Subjectivity. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e). Lury, C. & Wakeford, N. (2012). Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social. London and New York: Routledge.Marcinkowski, F. (2014). Mediatisation of Politics: Reflections on the State of the Concept. Javnost – The Public, 21(2), 5-22.Markwica, R. (2018). Emotional Choices: How the Logic of Affect Shapes Coercive Diplomacy. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Mazzoleni, G. (2017). Changes in Contemporary Communication Ecosystems Ask for a ‘New Look’ at the Concept of Mediatisation. Javnost – The Public, 24(2), 136-145.McGranahan, C. (2017). An Anthropology of Lying: Trump and the Political Sociality of Moral Outrage. American Ethnologist, 44(2), 243-248.McIntyre, L. C. (2018). Post-Truth. Cambridge (MA) and London: The MIT Press.Miller, J. (2014). The Fourth Screen: Mediatization and the Smartphone. Mobile Media and Communication, 2(2), 209-226.Müller, O. et. al. (2016). Utilizing Big Data Analytics for Information Systems Research: Challenges, Promises and Guidelines. European Journal of Information Systems, 25(4), 289-302.Noon Nave, N., Shifman, L. & Tenenboim-Weinblatt, K. (2018). Talking it Personally: Features of Successful Political Posts on Facebook. Social Media + Society. doi: 10.1177/2056305118784771.Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Papsdorf, C. (2015). How the Internet Automates Communication. Information, Communication & Society, 18(9), 991-1005.Perel, M. (2017). Black Box Tinkering: Beyond Disclosure in Algorithmic Enforcement. Florida Law Review, 69(1), 181-221.Puschmann, C. & Powell, A. (2018). Turning Words into Consumer Preferences: How Sentiment Analysis is Framed in Research and the News Media. Social Media + Society, doi: 10.1177/2056305118797724.Roselle, L., Miskimmon, A. & O’Loughlin, B. (2014). Strategic Narrative: A New Means to Understand Soft Power. Media, War & Conclict, 7(1), 70-84.Sanfilippo, M. R., Fichman, P. and Yang, S. (2018). Multidimensionality of Online Trolling Behaviors. The Information Society, 34(1), 27-39.Sicart, M. (2014). Play Matters. Cambridge (MA) and London: The MIT Press.Strengers, Y. & Nicholls, L. (2018). Aesthetic Pleasures and Gendered Tech-Work in the 21st-Century Smart Home. Media International Australia, 166(1), 70-80.Strömbäck, J. & Van Aelst, P. (2013). Why Political Parties Adapt to the Media: Exploring the Fourth Dimension of Mediatization. The International Communication Gazette, 75(4), 341-358.Vaidhyanathan, S. (2018). Anti-Social Media: Hoe Facebook Disconnects Us and Undermines Democracy. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Von Scheve, C. (2018). A Social Relational Account of Affect. European Journal of Social Theory, 21(1): 39-59.Yeung, K. (2017) ‘Hypernudge’: Big Data as a Mode of Regulation by Design. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 118-136.Ignas Kalpokas - 2019info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/3560PosverdadBig-dataPlacerAfectoPost-truthBig-dataPleasureAffectJoy to the world : the satisfaction of post-truth.Joy to the world : the satisfaction of post-truth.Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2443https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/cda9c387-2509-4b99-b4bc-7adec5d4a91a/download06695d80df6d2a08b50703bed08ecea5MD5110983/29970oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/299702024-06-02 14:32:44.735https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Ignas Kalpokas - 2019https://repository.ucatolica.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaCbdigital@metabiblioteca.com

Publicaciones similares