Traducción, adaptación al español y validación de la Escala de Bienestar Mental de Warwick-Edinburgh en una muestra de adultos mayores argentinos

El estudio analiza las propiedades psicométricas y la estructura factorial de la Escala de Bienestar Mental de Warwick- Edinburgh luego de realizar la traducción directa y revertida y su adaptación al español. Se validó la escala mediante su aplicación a una muestra de 910 adultos mayores argentinos...

Full description

Autores:
Serrani-Azcurra, Daniel
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2015
Institución:
Universidad Católica de Colombia
Repositorio:
RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/16245
Acceso en línea:
http://hdl.handle.net/10983/16245
Palabra clave:
ADULTOS MAYORES
BIENESTAR PSICOLÓGICO
BIENESTAR MENTAL
PROPIEDADES PSICOMÉTRICAS
ANÁLISIS FACTORIAL CONFIRMATORIO
ARGENTINE ELDERS
PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING
MENTAL WELL-BEING
PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES
CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS
ADULTOS MAIORES
BEM-ESTAR PSICOLÓGICO
BEM-ESTAR MENTAL
PROPRIEDADES PSICOMÉTRICAS
ANÁLISE FATORIAL CONFIRMATÓRIO
Rights
openAccess
License
Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2015
id UCATOLICA2_af8bdb9c9bdf55d8fd5e233cf66f360c
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/16245
network_acronym_str UCATOLICA2
network_name_str RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Traducción, adaptación al español y validación de la Escala de Bienestar Mental de Warwick-Edinburgh en una muestra de adultos mayores argentinos
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv Translation, spanish adaptation and validation of the Warwick-Edinburgh Well-Being Scale in a sample of argentine older adults
Tradução, adaptação ao espanhol e validação da Escala de Bem-Estar Mental de Warwick-Edinburgh em uma mostra de adultos maiores argentinos
title Traducción, adaptación al español y validación de la Escala de Bienestar Mental de Warwick-Edinburgh en una muestra de adultos mayores argentinos
spellingShingle Traducción, adaptación al español y validación de la Escala de Bienestar Mental de Warwick-Edinburgh en una muestra de adultos mayores argentinos
ADULTOS MAYORES
BIENESTAR PSICOLÓGICO
BIENESTAR MENTAL
PROPIEDADES PSICOMÉTRICAS
ANÁLISIS FACTORIAL CONFIRMATORIO
ARGENTINE ELDERS
PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING
MENTAL WELL-BEING
PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES
CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS
ADULTOS MAIORES
BEM-ESTAR PSICOLÓGICO
BEM-ESTAR MENTAL
PROPRIEDADES PSICOMÉTRICAS
ANÁLISE FATORIAL CONFIRMATÓRIO
title_short Traducción, adaptación al español y validación de la Escala de Bienestar Mental de Warwick-Edinburgh en una muestra de adultos mayores argentinos
title_full Traducción, adaptación al español y validación de la Escala de Bienestar Mental de Warwick-Edinburgh en una muestra de adultos mayores argentinos
title_fullStr Traducción, adaptación al español y validación de la Escala de Bienestar Mental de Warwick-Edinburgh en una muestra de adultos mayores argentinos
title_full_unstemmed Traducción, adaptación al español y validación de la Escala de Bienestar Mental de Warwick-Edinburgh en una muestra de adultos mayores argentinos
title_sort Traducción, adaptación al español y validación de la Escala de Bienestar Mental de Warwick-Edinburgh en una muestra de adultos mayores argentinos
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Serrani-Azcurra, Daniel
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Serrani-Azcurra, Daniel
dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv ADULTOS MAYORES
BIENESTAR PSICOLÓGICO
BIENESTAR MENTAL
PROPIEDADES PSICOMÉTRICAS
ANÁLISIS FACTORIAL CONFIRMATORIO
ARGENTINE ELDERS
PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING
MENTAL WELL-BEING
PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES
CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS
ADULTOS MAIORES
BEM-ESTAR PSICOLÓGICO
BEM-ESTAR MENTAL
PROPRIEDADES PSICOMÉTRICAS
ANÁLISE FATORIAL CONFIRMATÓRIO
topic ADULTOS MAYORES
BIENESTAR PSICOLÓGICO
BIENESTAR MENTAL
PROPIEDADES PSICOMÉTRICAS
ANÁLISIS FACTORIAL CONFIRMATORIO
ARGENTINE ELDERS
PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING
MENTAL WELL-BEING
PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES
CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS
ADULTOS MAIORES
BEM-ESTAR PSICOLÓGICO
BEM-ESTAR MENTAL
PROPRIEDADES PSICOMÉTRICAS
ANÁLISE FATORIAL CONFIRMATÓRIO
description El estudio analiza las propiedades psicométricas y la estructura factorial de la Escala de Bienestar Mental de Warwick- Edinburgh luego de realizar la traducción directa y revertida y su adaptación al español. Se validó la escala mediante su aplicación a una muestra de 910 adultos mayores argentinos, con edades comprendidas entre 71 y 96 años (media 81.4 años; DE 10.9 años). Se obtuvieron los siguientes indicadores: distribución de respuestas, consistencia interna, confiabilidad test-retest, validez de constructo, y se realizó un análisis factorial exploratorio y confirmatorio. En cuatro de los ítems se debieron modificar los términos para mantener la equivalencia conceptual con el original. El índice de confiabilidad alfa de Cronbach (0.89), la correlación ítem-escala total (0.41-0.78), el índice test-retest medido mediante el coeficiente de correlación intra-clase (CCI) (0.91) mostraron un nivel satisfactorio. El análisis factorial confirmatorio mostró un RMSEA de 0.054, considerado aceptable; un valor CFI igual a 0.963, un valor de NNFI 0.925 (levemente inferior al deseado) y un GFI con un valor de 0.991. Se obtuvo una solución de dos factores, por lo cual no se pudo sostener la hipótesis de uni-dimensionalidad de la escala original. Se concluye que la escala traducida y adaptada al español para una muestra de adultos mayores no institucionalizados tiene un ajuste adecuado, con alta consistencia interna y buena confiabilidad test-retest, con iguales valores de constructo que el instrumento original, lo que permitiría su uso en la población adulta mayor.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.issued.spa.fl_str_mv 2015-06
dc.date.accessioned.spa.fl_str_mv 2018-07-30T23:14:14Z
dc.date.available.spa.fl_str_mv 2018-07-30T23:14:14Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.spa.fl_str_mv Serrani-Azcurra, D. (2015). Traducción, adaptación al español y validación de la Escala de Bienestar Mental de Warwick-Edinburgh en una muestra de adultos mayores argentinos. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 18(1), 79-93. Recuperado de http://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/ojsucatolica/revistas_ucatolica/index.php/acta-colombiana-psicologia/article/view/144
dc.identifier.issn.spa.fl_str_mv 0123-9155
dc.identifier.uri.spa.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10983/16245
identifier_str_mv Serrani-Azcurra, D. (2015). Traducción, adaptación al español y validación de la Escala de Bienestar Mental de Warwick-Edinburgh en una muestra de adultos mayores argentinos. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 18(1), 79-93. Recuperado de http://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/ojsucatolica/revistas_ucatolica/index.php/acta-colombiana-psicologia/article/view/144
0123-9155
url http://hdl.handle.net/10983/16245
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Acta Colombiana de Psicología, Vol. 18, no. 1 (ene.-jun. 2015); p. 79-93
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv Adams, K. B., Leibbrandt, S., & Moon, H. (2011). A Critical Review of the Literature on Social and Leisure Activity and Well-being in Later Life. Ageing and Society, 31(4), 683
Bartram, D. J., Sinclair, J. M., & Baldwin, D. S. (2013). Further validation of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) in the UK veterinary profession: Rasch analysis. Quality of Life Research, 1-13.
Bech, P. (2004). Measuring the Dimensions of Psychological General Well-Being by the WHO-5. Quality of Life Newsletter, 32, 15-16.
Bernal, G., Bonilla, J., & Bellido, C. (1995). Ecological Validity and Cultural Sensitivity for Outcome Research: Issues for the Cultural Adaptation and Development of Psychosocial Treatments with Hispanics. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 23(1), 67-82.
Cabañero, M. J., Richard, M., Cabrero, J., Orts, I., Reig, A., y Tosal, B. (2004). Fiabilidad y validez de la Escala de Satisfacción con la Vida de Diener en una muestra de mujeres embarazadas y puérperas. Psicothema, 16, 448-455.
Castellví, P., Forero, C. G., Codony, M., Vilagut, G., Brugulat, P., Medina, A., & Alonso, J. (2013). The Spanish Version of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS) is Valid for Use in the General Population. Quality of Life Research, 1-12.
Christopher, J. C., Hickinbottom, S. (2008). Positive Psychology, Ethnocentrism, and the Disguised Ideology of Individualism. Theory & Psychology, 18(5), 563-589.
Cicchetti, D.V., Sparrow, S. (1981). Developing Criteria for Establishing Interrater Reliability of Specific Items: Application To Assessment of Adaptive Behavior. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86, 127-137.
Clark, F., Jackson, J., Carlson, M., Chou, C. P., Cherry, B. J., Jordan-Marsh, M., & Azen, S. P. (2012). Effectiveness of a Lifestyle Intervention in Promoting the Well-Being of Independently Living Older People: Results of the Well Elderly 2 Randomised Controlled Trial. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 66(9), 782-790.
Clarke, A., Friede, T., Putz, R., Ashdown, J., Martin, S., Blake, A., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2011). Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): Validated for Teenage School Students in England and Scotland. A Mixed Methods Assessment. BMC Public Health, 11(1), 487.
Deary, I. J., Watson, R., Booth, T., Gale, C. R. (2013). Does Cognitive Ability Influence Responses to the Warwick- Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale? Psychological Assessment; 25(2), 313-8.
Demir, M., & Özdemir, M. (2010). Friendship, Need Satisfaction and Happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 243-259.
Díaz, D., Rodríguez, R., Blanco, A., Moreno, B., Gallardo, I., Valle, C. y van Dierendonck, D. (2006). Adaptación española de las Escalas de Bienestar Psicológico de Ryff. Psicothema, 18(3), 572-577.
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective Well-Being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542-575.
Diener, E. (2012). New Findings and Future Directions for Subjective Well-Being Research. American Psychologist, 67(8), 590.
Diener, E., & Chan, M. Y. (2011). Happy People Live Longer: Subjective Well-Being Contributes to Health and Longevity. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 3(1), 1-43.
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1): 71-75.
Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Ryan, K. L. (2013). Universals and Cultural Differences in the Causes and Structure of Happiness: A Multilevel Review. In: Mental Well-Being (pp. 153-176). Springer Netherlands.
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective Well-Being: Three Decades of Progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276.
Escobar, J. & Cuervo, Á. (2008). Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: una aproximación a su utilización. Avances en Medición, 6(1), 29.
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Psychological Research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272-299.
Flaherty, J. A., Gaviria, F. M., Pathak, D., Mitchell, T., Wintrob, R., Richman, J. A., Birz, S. (1988). Developing Instruments for Cross-Cultural Psychiatric Research. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 176(5), 257-263.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Joiner, T. (2002). Positive Emotions Trigger Upward Spirals toward Emotional Well-Being. Psychological Science, 13(2), 172-175.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2011). IBM SPSS Statistics 21 Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference (13th ed.). Pearson Higher Ed: USA.
Gracia, E., & Herrero, J. (2006). La comunidad como fuente de apoyo social: evaluación e implicaciones en los ámbitos individual y comunitario. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 38, 327-342.
Heikkinen, R. L., & Kauppinen, M. (2011). Mental Well-Being: A 16-Year Follow-Up among Older Residents in Jyväskylä. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 52(1), 33-39.
Henderson, L.W., & Knight, T. (2012). Integrating the Hedonic and Eudaimonic Perspectives to Morecomprehensively Understand Well-being And Pathways to Well-being. International Journal of Well-being, 2(3), 196-221.
Hu, L. y Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis. Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
Huppert, F. A. and So, T. T. (2013). Flourishing Across Europe: Application of a New Conceptual Framework for Defining Well-Being. Social Indicators Research, 110, 837-861.
Joseph, S., Linley, P. A., Harwood, J., Lewis, C. A., McCollam, P. (2004). Rapid Assessment of Well-Being: The Short Depression-Happiness Scale (SDHS). Psychology and Psychotherapy, 77, 463-478.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An Index of Factorial Simplicity. Psychometrica, 39, 31-36
Kammann, R., Flett, R. (1983). A Scale to Measure Current Level of General Happiness. Australian Journal of Psychology, 35, 259-265.
Kashdan, T. B., Biswas-Diener, R., & King, L. A. (2008). Reconsidering Happiness: The Costs of Distinguishing Between Hedonics and Eudaimonia. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(4), 219-233.
Keyes, C., Ryff, C., y Shmotkin, D. (2002). Optimizing Well- Being: The Empirical Encounter of Two Traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 1007-1022.
Kim-Prieto, C., Diener, E., Tamir, M., Scollon, C., & Diener, M. (2013). Integrating the Diverse Definitions of Happiness: A Time-Sequential Framework of Subjective Well-Being. In The Exploration of Happiness (pp. 47-75). Springer, Netherlands.
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity. Personnel Psychology Inc, 28, 563-575.
Lloyd, K., & Devine, P. (2012). Psychometric Properties of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS) in Northern Ireland. Journal of Mental Health, 21(3), 257-263.
López, M. A., Gabilondo, A., Codony, M., García-Forero, C., Vilagut, G., Castellví, P., & Alonso, J. (2012). Adaptation into Spanish of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) and Preliminary Validation in a Student Sample. Quality of Life Research, 1-6.
Machin, D., Campbell, M. J., Tan, S. B., & Tan, S. H. (2011). Sample Size Tables for Clinical Studies. John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, U.K.
Maheswaran, H., Weich, S., Powell, J., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2012). Evaluating the Responsiveness of the Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS): Group and Individual Level Analysis. Health Quaity of Life Outcomes, 10(1), 156.
Maneersriwongul, W., Dixon, J. K. (2004). Instrument Translation Process: A Methods Review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 48(2), 175-186.
McDowell, I. (2010). Measures of Self-Perceived Well-Being. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 69(1), 69-79.
Montero, I. y León, O. (2005). Sistema de clasificación del método en los informes de investigación en psicología. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 5(1), 115-127.
Nelis, D., Kotsou, I., Quoidbach, J., Hansenne, M., Weytens, F., Dupuis, P., & Mikolajczak, M. (2011). Increasing Emotional Competence Improves Psychological and Physical Well- Being, Social Relationships, and Employability. Emotion, 11(2), 354.
Nieminen, T., Martelin, T., Koskinen, S., Aro, H., Alanen, E., & Hyyppä, M. T. (2010). Social Capital as a Determinant of Self-Rated Health and Psychological Well-Being. International Journal of Public Health, 55(6), 531-542.
Park, N. (2004). The Role of Subjective Well-Being in Positive Youth Development. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591(1), 25-39.
Polit, D.F., Beck, C.T., Owen, S.V., (2007). Is the CVI an Acceptable Indicator of Content Validity? Appraisal and Recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health 30, 459-467.
Proctor, C., Maltby, J., & Linley, P. A. (2011). Strengths Use as a Predictor of Well-Being and Health-Related Quality of Life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(1), 153-169.
Ramada-Rodilla, J. M., Serra-Pujadas, C., Delclós-Clanchet, G. L. (2013). Adaptación cultural y validación de cuestionarios de salud: revisión y recomendaciones metodológicas. Salud Pública Mex, 55, 57-6.
Rocha, K. B., Pérez, K., Rodríguez-Sanz, M., Borrell, C., & Llandrich, J. O. (2011). Propiedades psicométricas y valores normativos del General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) en población general española. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 11(1), 125-139.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On Happiness and Human Potential: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141-166.
Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2013). Know Thyself and Become What You Are: A Eudaimonic Approach to Psychological Well-Being. In The Exploration of Happiness (pp. 97-116). Springer Netherlands.
Ryff, C. D., Keyes, C. L. (1995). The Structure of Psychological Well-Being Revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719-727.
Seligman, M. E. (2011). Flourish. North Sydney, N.S.W.: Random House Australia.
Seligman, M. E., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive Psychology: An Introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5.
Stewart-Brown, S. (2013). The Warwick-Edimburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS): Performance in Different Cultural and Geographical Groups. In C.L.M. Keyes (Ed.), Mental Well-Being: International Contributions to the Study of Positive Mental Health. (pp. 133-150). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Stewart-Brown, S., Tennant, A., Tennant, R., Platt, S., Parkinson, J., & Weich, S. (2009). Internal Construct Validity of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS): A Rasch Analysis Using Data from the Scottish Health Education Population Survey. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7(1), 15-22.
Taggart, F., Friede, T., Weich, S., Clarke, A., Johnson, M., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2013). Cross Cultural Evaluation of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS)-A Mixed Methods Study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11(1), 27.
Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2011). Needs and Subjective Well- Being around the World. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 354.
Tennant, R., Joseph, S., Stewart-Brown, S. (2007a). The Affectometer 2: A Measure of Positive Mental Health in UK Populations. Quality of Life Research, 16(4), 687-695.
Tennant, R., Hiller, L., Fishwick, R., Platt, S., Joseph, S., Weich, S., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2007b). The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS): Development and UK Validation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5(1), 63.
Trust, M. O. (1997). Trust Introduces New Translation Criteria. Medical Outcomes Trust Bulletin, 5, 3-4.
Van Dierendonck, D. (2004) The Construct Validity of Ryff's Scale of Psychological Well-Being and its Extension with Spiritual Well-Being. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(3), 629-644.
Van Dierendonck, D., Díaz, D., Rodríguez-Carvajal, R., Blanco, A., & Moreno-Jiménez, B. (2008). Ryff's Six-Factor Model of Psychological Well-Being, A Spanish Exploration. Social Indicators Research, 87(3), 473-479.
Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S., & Conti, R. (2008). The Implications of Two Conceptions of Happiness (Hedonic Enjoyment and Eudaimonia) For the Understanding of Intrinsic Motivation. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 41-79.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: the PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6(54), 1063-70.
Widaman, K. F. (1993). Common Factor Analysis versus Principal Component Analysis: Differential Bias in Representing Model Parameters? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28(3), 263-311.
Zhang, W., Chen, Q., McCubbin, H., McCubbin, L., & Foley, S. (2011). Predictors of Mental and Physical Health: Individual and Neighborhood Levels of Education, Social Well-Being, and Ethnicity. Health & Place, 17(1), 238-247.
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2015
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.creativecommons.spa.fl_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2015
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Católica de Colombia. Facultad de Psicología
institution Universidad Católica de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/5a45bcf1-bdf3-4871-b2e0-759a860fa37a/download
https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/32517e11-8d04-4b20-9319-ffe8ca7bfa0d/download
https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/763d806c-85fc-4f8a-8598-4ad05a224da2/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 77565c57fac404c7d541b5a9d821f8e2
3b0d8f50badef2b335f63c055f310715
47a5667b370bdd86a7149aa4ba84f49b
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_ 1814256353535852544
spelling Serrani-Azcurra, Danielaa02dafe-8516-42a2-a5e1-80c335b27c8f-12018-07-30T23:14:14Z2018-07-30T23:14:14Z2015-06El estudio analiza las propiedades psicométricas y la estructura factorial de la Escala de Bienestar Mental de Warwick- Edinburgh luego de realizar la traducción directa y revertida y su adaptación al español. Se validó la escala mediante su aplicación a una muestra de 910 adultos mayores argentinos, con edades comprendidas entre 71 y 96 años (media 81.4 años; DE 10.9 años). Se obtuvieron los siguientes indicadores: distribución de respuestas, consistencia interna, confiabilidad test-retest, validez de constructo, y se realizó un análisis factorial exploratorio y confirmatorio. En cuatro de los ítems se debieron modificar los términos para mantener la equivalencia conceptual con el original. El índice de confiabilidad alfa de Cronbach (0.89), la correlación ítem-escala total (0.41-0.78), el índice test-retest medido mediante el coeficiente de correlación intra-clase (CCI) (0.91) mostraron un nivel satisfactorio. El análisis factorial confirmatorio mostró un RMSEA de 0.054, considerado aceptable; un valor CFI igual a 0.963, un valor de NNFI 0.925 (levemente inferior al deseado) y un GFI con un valor de 0.991. Se obtuvo una solución de dos factores, por lo cual no se pudo sostener la hipótesis de uni-dimensionalidad de la escala original. Se concluye que la escala traducida y adaptada al español para una muestra de adultos mayores no institucionalizados tiene un ajuste adecuado, con alta consistencia interna y buena confiabilidad test-retest, con iguales valores de constructo que el instrumento original, lo que permitiría su uso en la población adulta mayor.O estudo analisa as propriedades psicométricas e a estrutura fatorial da Escala de Bem-estar Mental de Warwick-Edinburgh depois de realizar a tradução direta e revertida e sua adaptação ao espanhol. Validou-se a escala mediante sua aplicação a uma mostra de 910 adultos maiores argentinos, com idades compreendidas entre 71 e 96 anos (média 81.4 anos; DE 10.9 anos). Obtiveram-se os seguintes indicadores: distribuição de respostas, consistência interna, confiabilidade teste-reteste, validade de constructo, e realizou-se uma análise fatorial exploratória e confirmatória. Em quatro dos itens tiveram que ser modificados os termos para manter a equivalência conceitual com o original. O índice de confiabilidade alfa de Cronbach (0.89), a correlação item-escala total (0.41-0.78), o índice teste-reteste medido mediante o coeficiente de correlação intra-classe (CCI) (0.91) mostraram um nível satisfatório. A análise fatorial confirmatória mostrou um RMSEA de 0.054, considerado aceitável; um valor CFI igual a 0.963, um valor de NNFI 0.925 (levemente inferior ao desejado) e um GFI com um valor de 0.991. Obteve-se uma solução de dois fatores, pelo qual não de pôde sustentar a hipótese de uni-dimensionalidade da escala original. Concluise que a escala traduzida e adaptada ao espanhol para uma mostra de adultos maiores não institucionalizados tem um ajuste adequado, com alta consistência interna e boa confiabilidade teste-reteste, com iguais valores de constructo que o instrumento original, o que permitiria seu uso na população adulta maior.The study assesses psychometric properties and factorial structure of the Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale after forward and backward translations and Spanish adaptation. The scale was validated by applying it to a sample of 910 Argentine elders, with ages ranging from 71 and 96 years (media 81.4 years; SD 10.9 years). The following measures were obtained: response distributions, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In four of the original items, phrasing was modified to keep conceptual equivalence with the original instrument. Reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.89), item-total scale (0.41-0.78) and test-retest measured by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) (0.91) were deemed appropriate. Confirmatory factorial analysis showed a RMSEA = 0.054, considered acceptable, a CFI = 0.963, a NNFI = 0.925 (slightly below the accepted value) and a GFI = 0.991. A two factor solution was obtained so it was not possible to hold the single dimensional hypothesis as in the original scale. The translated and adapted scale shows an appropriate level of adjustment, high internal consistency and good test-retest reliability, with the same construct validity as the original instrument which allows its use among the elderly population.application/pdfSerrani-Azcurra, D. (2015). Traducción, adaptación al español y validación de la Escala de Bienestar Mental de Warwick-Edinburgh en una muestra de adultos mayores argentinos. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 18(1), 79-93. Recuperado de http://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/ojsucatolica/revistas_ucatolica/index.php/acta-colombiana-psicologia/article/view/1440123-9155http://hdl.handle.net/10983/16245spaUniversidad Católica de Colombia. Facultad de PsicologíaActa Colombiana de Psicología, Vol. 18, no. 1 (ene.-jun. 2015); p. 79-93Adams, K. B., Leibbrandt, S., & Moon, H. (2011). A Critical Review of the Literature on Social and Leisure Activity and Well-being in Later Life. Ageing and Society, 31(4), 683Bartram, D. J., Sinclair, J. M., & Baldwin, D. S. (2013). Further validation of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) in the UK veterinary profession: Rasch analysis. Quality of Life Research, 1-13.Bech, P. (2004). Measuring the Dimensions of Psychological General Well-Being by the WHO-5. Quality of Life Newsletter, 32, 15-16.Bernal, G., Bonilla, J., & Bellido, C. (1995). Ecological Validity and Cultural Sensitivity for Outcome Research: Issues for the Cultural Adaptation and Development of Psychosocial Treatments with Hispanics. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 23(1), 67-82.Cabañero, M. J., Richard, M., Cabrero, J., Orts, I., Reig, A., y Tosal, B. (2004). Fiabilidad y validez de la Escala de Satisfacción con la Vida de Diener en una muestra de mujeres embarazadas y puérperas. Psicothema, 16, 448-455.Castellví, P., Forero, C. G., Codony, M., Vilagut, G., Brugulat, P., Medina, A., & Alonso, J. (2013). The Spanish Version of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS) is Valid for Use in the General Population. Quality of Life Research, 1-12.Christopher, J. C., Hickinbottom, S. (2008). Positive Psychology, Ethnocentrism, and the Disguised Ideology of Individualism. Theory & Psychology, 18(5), 563-589.Cicchetti, D.V., Sparrow, S. (1981). Developing Criteria for Establishing Interrater Reliability of Specific Items: Application To Assessment of Adaptive Behavior. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86, 127-137.Clark, F., Jackson, J., Carlson, M., Chou, C. P., Cherry, B. J., Jordan-Marsh, M., & Azen, S. P. (2012). Effectiveness of a Lifestyle Intervention in Promoting the Well-Being of Independently Living Older People: Results of the Well Elderly 2 Randomised Controlled Trial. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 66(9), 782-790.Clarke, A., Friede, T., Putz, R., Ashdown, J., Martin, S., Blake, A., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2011). Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): Validated for Teenage School Students in England and Scotland. A Mixed Methods Assessment. BMC Public Health, 11(1), 487.Deary, I. J., Watson, R., Booth, T., Gale, C. R. (2013). Does Cognitive Ability Influence Responses to the Warwick- Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale? Psychological Assessment; 25(2), 313-8.Demir, M., & Özdemir, M. (2010). Friendship, Need Satisfaction and Happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 243-259.Díaz, D., Rodríguez, R., Blanco, A., Moreno, B., Gallardo, I., Valle, C. y van Dierendonck, D. (2006). Adaptación española de las Escalas de Bienestar Psicológico de Ryff. Psicothema, 18(3), 572-577.Diener, E. (1984). Subjective Well-Being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542-575.Diener, E. (2012). New Findings and Future Directions for Subjective Well-Being Research. American Psychologist, 67(8), 590.Diener, E., & Chan, M. Y. (2011). Happy People Live Longer: Subjective Well-Being Contributes to Health and Longevity. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 3(1), 1-43.Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1): 71-75.Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Ryan, K. L. (2013). Universals and Cultural Differences in the Causes and Structure of Happiness: A Multilevel Review. In: Mental Well-Being (pp. 153-176). Springer Netherlands.Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective Well-Being: Three Decades of Progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276.Escobar, J. & Cuervo, Á. (2008). Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: una aproximación a su utilización. Avances en Medición, 6(1), 29.Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Psychological Research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272-299.Flaherty, J. A., Gaviria, F. M., Pathak, D., Mitchell, T., Wintrob, R., Richman, J. A., Birz, S. (1988). Developing Instruments for Cross-Cultural Psychiatric Research. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 176(5), 257-263.Fredrickson, B. L., & Joiner, T. (2002). Positive Emotions Trigger Upward Spirals toward Emotional Well-Being. Psychological Science, 13(2), 172-175.George, D., & Mallery, P. (2011). IBM SPSS Statistics 21 Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference (13th ed.). Pearson Higher Ed: USA.Gracia, E., & Herrero, J. (2006). La comunidad como fuente de apoyo social: evaluación e implicaciones en los ámbitos individual y comunitario. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 38, 327-342.Heikkinen, R. L., & Kauppinen, M. (2011). Mental Well-Being: A 16-Year Follow-Up among Older Residents in Jyväskylä. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 52(1), 33-39.Henderson, L.W., & Knight, T. (2012). Integrating the Hedonic and Eudaimonic Perspectives to Morecomprehensively Understand Well-being And Pathways to Well-being. International Journal of Well-being, 2(3), 196-221.Hu, L. y Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis. Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.Huppert, F. A. and So, T. T. (2013). Flourishing Across Europe: Application of a New Conceptual Framework for Defining Well-Being. Social Indicators Research, 110, 837-861.Joseph, S., Linley, P. A., Harwood, J., Lewis, C. A., McCollam, P. (2004). Rapid Assessment of Well-Being: The Short Depression-Happiness Scale (SDHS). Psychology and Psychotherapy, 77, 463-478.Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An Index of Factorial Simplicity. Psychometrica, 39, 31-36Kammann, R., Flett, R. (1983). A Scale to Measure Current Level of General Happiness. Australian Journal of Psychology, 35, 259-265.Kashdan, T. B., Biswas-Diener, R., & King, L. A. (2008). Reconsidering Happiness: The Costs of Distinguishing Between Hedonics and Eudaimonia. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(4), 219-233.Keyes, C., Ryff, C., y Shmotkin, D. (2002). Optimizing Well- Being: The Empirical Encounter of Two Traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 1007-1022.Kim-Prieto, C., Diener, E., Tamir, M., Scollon, C., & Diener, M. (2013). Integrating the Diverse Definitions of Happiness: A Time-Sequential Framework of Subjective Well-Being. In The Exploration of Happiness (pp. 47-75). Springer, Netherlands.Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity. Personnel Psychology Inc, 28, 563-575.Lloyd, K., & Devine, P. (2012). Psychometric Properties of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS) in Northern Ireland. Journal of Mental Health, 21(3), 257-263.López, M. A., Gabilondo, A., Codony, M., García-Forero, C., Vilagut, G., Castellví, P., & Alonso, J. (2012). Adaptation into Spanish of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) and Preliminary Validation in a Student Sample. Quality of Life Research, 1-6.Machin, D., Campbell, M. J., Tan, S. B., & Tan, S. H. (2011). Sample Size Tables for Clinical Studies. John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, U.K.Maheswaran, H., Weich, S., Powell, J., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2012). Evaluating the Responsiveness of the Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS): Group and Individual Level Analysis. Health Quaity of Life Outcomes, 10(1), 156.Maneersriwongul, W., Dixon, J. K. (2004). Instrument Translation Process: A Methods Review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 48(2), 175-186.McDowell, I. (2010). Measures of Self-Perceived Well-Being. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 69(1), 69-79.Montero, I. y León, O. (2005). Sistema de clasificación del método en los informes de investigación en psicología. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 5(1), 115-127.Nelis, D., Kotsou, I., Quoidbach, J., Hansenne, M., Weytens, F., Dupuis, P., & Mikolajczak, M. (2011). Increasing Emotional Competence Improves Psychological and Physical Well- Being, Social Relationships, and Employability. Emotion, 11(2), 354.Nieminen, T., Martelin, T., Koskinen, S., Aro, H., Alanen, E., & Hyyppä, M. T. (2010). Social Capital as a Determinant of Self-Rated Health and Psychological Well-Being. International Journal of Public Health, 55(6), 531-542.Park, N. (2004). The Role of Subjective Well-Being in Positive Youth Development. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591(1), 25-39.Polit, D.F., Beck, C.T., Owen, S.V., (2007). Is the CVI an Acceptable Indicator of Content Validity? Appraisal and Recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health 30, 459-467.Proctor, C., Maltby, J., & Linley, P. A. (2011). Strengths Use as a Predictor of Well-Being and Health-Related Quality of Life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(1), 153-169.Ramada-Rodilla, J. M., Serra-Pujadas, C., Delclós-Clanchet, G. L. (2013). Adaptación cultural y validación de cuestionarios de salud: revisión y recomendaciones metodológicas. Salud Pública Mex, 55, 57-6.Rocha, K. B., Pérez, K., Rodríguez-Sanz, M., Borrell, C., & Llandrich, J. O. (2011). Propiedades psicométricas y valores normativos del General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) en población general española. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 11(1), 125-139.Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On Happiness and Human Potential: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141-166.Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2013). Know Thyself and Become What You Are: A Eudaimonic Approach to Psychological Well-Being. In The Exploration of Happiness (pp. 97-116). Springer Netherlands.Ryff, C. D., Keyes, C. L. (1995). The Structure of Psychological Well-Being Revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719-727.Seligman, M. E. (2011). Flourish. North Sydney, N.S.W.: Random House Australia.Seligman, M. E., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive Psychology: An Introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5.Stewart-Brown, S. (2013). The Warwick-Edimburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS): Performance in Different Cultural and Geographical Groups. In C.L.M. Keyes (Ed.), Mental Well-Being: International Contributions to the Study of Positive Mental Health. (pp. 133-150). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Stewart-Brown, S., Tennant, A., Tennant, R., Platt, S., Parkinson, J., & Weich, S. (2009). Internal Construct Validity of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS): A Rasch Analysis Using Data from the Scottish Health Education Population Survey. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7(1), 15-22.Taggart, F., Friede, T., Weich, S., Clarke, A., Johnson, M., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2013). Cross Cultural Evaluation of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS)-A Mixed Methods Study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11(1), 27.Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2011). Needs and Subjective Well- Being around the World. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 354.Tennant, R., Joseph, S., Stewart-Brown, S. (2007a). The Affectometer 2: A Measure of Positive Mental Health in UK Populations. Quality of Life Research, 16(4), 687-695.Tennant, R., Hiller, L., Fishwick, R., Platt, S., Joseph, S., Weich, S., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2007b). The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS): Development and UK Validation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5(1), 63.Trust, M. O. (1997). Trust Introduces New Translation Criteria. Medical Outcomes Trust Bulletin, 5, 3-4.Van Dierendonck, D. (2004) The Construct Validity of Ryff's Scale of Psychological Well-Being and its Extension with Spiritual Well-Being. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(3), 629-644.Van Dierendonck, D., Díaz, D., Rodríguez-Carvajal, R., Blanco, A., & Moreno-Jiménez, B. (2008). Ryff's Six-Factor Model of Psychological Well-Being, A Spanish Exploration. Social Indicators Research, 87(3), 473-479.Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S., & Conti, R. (2008). The Implications of Two Conceptions of Happiness (Hedonic Enjoyment and Eudaimonia) For the Understanding of Intrinsic Motivation. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 41-79.Watson, D., Clark, L. A., Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: the PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6(54), 1063-70.Widaman, K. F. (1993). Common Factor Analysis versus Principal Component Analysis: Differential Bias in Representing Model Parameters? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28(3), 263-311.Zhang, W., Chen, Q., McCubbin, H., McCubbin, L., & Foley, S. (2011). Predictors of Mental and Physical Health: Individual and Neighborhood Levels of Education, Social Well-Being, and Ethnicity. Health & Place, 17(1), 238-247.Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2015info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2ADULTOS MAYORESBIENESTAR PSICOLÓGICOBIENESTAR MENTALPROPIEDADES PSICOMÉTRICASANÁLISIS FACTORIAL CONFIRMATORIOARGENTINE ELDERSPSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEINGMENTAL WELL-BEINGPSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIESCONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSISADULTOS MAIORESBEM-ESTAR PSICOLÓGICOBEM-ESTAR MENTALPROPRIEDADES PSICOMÉTRICASANÁLISE FATORIAL CONFIRMATÓRIOTraducción, adaptación al español y validación de la Escala de Bienestar Mental de Warwick-Edinburgh en una muestra de adultos mayores argentinosTranslation, spanish adaptation and validation of the Warwick-Edinburgh Well-Being Scale in a sample of argentine older adultsTradução, adaptação ao espanhol e validação da Escala de Bem-Estar Mental de Warwick-Edinburgh em uma mostra de adultos maiores argentinosArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85PublicationORIGINALTraducción, adaptación al español y validación de la Escala de Bienestar Mental de Warwick-Edinburgh en una muestra de adultos mayores argentinos.pdfTraducción, adaptación al español y validación de la Escala de Bienestar Mental de Warwick-Edinburgh en una muestra de adultos mayores argentinos.pdfArtículo en españolapplication/pdf386668https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/5a45bcf1-bdf3-4871-b2e0-759a860fa37a/download77565c57fac404c7d541b5a9d821f8e2MD51TEXTTraducción, adaptación al español y validación de la Escala de Bienestar Mental de Warwick-Edinburgh en una muestra de adultos mayores argentinos.pdf.txtTraducción, adaptación al español y validación de la Escala de Bienestar Mental de Warwick-Edinburgh en una muestra de adultos mayores argentinos.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain59001https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/32517e11-8d04-4b20-9319-ffe8ca7bfa0d/download3b0d8f50badef2b335f63c055f310715MD52THUMBNAILTraducción, adaptación al español y validación de la Escala de Bienestar Mental de Warwick-Edinburgh en una muestra de adultos mayores argentinos.pdf.jpgTraducción, adaptación al español y validación de la Escala de Bienestar Mental de Warwick-Edinburgh en una muestra de adultos mayores argentinos.pdf.jpgRIUCACimage/jpeg24506https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/763d806c-85fc-4f8a-8598-4ad05a224da2/download47a5667b370bdd86a7149aa4ba84f49bMD5310983/16245oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/162452023-03-24 17:07:54.521https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2015https://repository.ucatolica.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaCbdigital@metabiblioteca.com

Publicaciones similares