Improving bioethical decision-making with a little help from legal argumentation

The most appropriate method for clinical decision-making is deliberation. The deliberative procedure aims to achieve wise and prudent decisions about health care taking into account facts, values and norms. Since deliberative reasoning is shared by healthcare professions, ethics and law, this paper...

Full description

Autores:
Seoane, José Antonio
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2016
Institución:
Universidad Católica de Colombia
Repositorio:
RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/23198
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/10983/23198
Palabra clave:
BIOETHICS
CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING
DELIBERATION
LEGAL ARGUMENTATION
ARGUMENTACIÓN JURÍDICA
BIOÉTICA
DELIBERACIÓN
TOMA DE DECISIONES CLÍNICAS
Rights
openAccess
License
Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2016
id UCATOLICA2_a830de9ea19e48490e8393a799f0c648
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/23198
network_acronym_str UCATOLICA2
network_name_str RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
repository_id_str
spelling Seoane, José Antonio4cfb5dd4-c2d5-4251-820d-52fca62ba307-12019-06-10T21:09:08Z2019-06-10T21:09:08Z2016-01The most appropriate method for clinical decision-making is deliberation. The deliberative procedure aims to achieve wise and prudent decisions about health care taking into account facts, values and norms. Since deliberative reasoning is shared by healthcare professions, ethics and law, this paper introduces the structure and features of the bioethical deliberative procedure and suggests to improve it with some contributions from legal science and theories of argumentation.El método más adecuado para la toma de decisiones biomédicas es la deliberación. El procedimiento deliberativo pretende alcanzar decisiones prudentes y razonables tras tomar en consideración hechos, valores y normas. Al ser la racionalidad deliberativa un rasgo compartido por las profesiones asistenciales, la ética y el derecho, el presente artículo expone la estructura y las características del método bioético deliberativo y propone mejorarla mediante algunas contribuciones de la ciencia jurídica y las teorías de la argumentación.application/pdfSeoane, J. (2016). Improving bioethical decision-making with a little help from legal argumentation. Soft Power, 3(1), 109-129. Recuperado de https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/ojsucatolica/revistas_ucatolica/index.php/SoftP/article/view/1801/16412389-8232https://hdl.handle.net/10983/23198engUniversidad Católica de Colombia. Facultad de DerechoSoft Power, Vol. 3, no. 1 (ene.-jun. 2016); p. 109-129Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2016info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAtribución-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-ND 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2BIOETHICSCLINICAL DECISION-MAKINGDELIBERATIONLEGAL ARGUMENTATIONARGUMENTACIÓN JURÍDICABIOÉTICADELIBERACIÓNTOMA DE DECISIONES CLÍNICASImproving bioethical decision-making with a little help from legal argumentationArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85PublicationORIGINALImproving bioethical decision-making with a little help from legal argumentation.pdfImproving bioethical decision-making with a little help from legal argumentation.pdfImproving bioethical decision-making with a little help from legal argumentationapplication/pdf141713https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/e0a1addb-a4b9-40c2-bd44-74d58fc443e3/download4a36dbbdd25617116cf828932ad23c3dMD51TEXTImproving bioethical decision-making with a little help from legal argumentation.pdf.txtImproving bioethical decision-making with a little help from legal argumentation.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain55437https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/486f75ba-eb1b-474f-add8-214017004962/download492c5889d174ed6e954f0985b4e4cd43MD52THUMBNAILImproving bioethical decision-making with a little help from legal argumentation.pdf.jpgImproving bioethical decision-making with a little help from legal argumentation.pdf.jpgRIUCACimage/jpeg13061https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/80417e8b-09bb-41c5-95c7-4a56410336b4/download2e5f288ec7db40905e605d4ceea79c84MD5310983/23198oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/231982023-03-24 16:27:29.436https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2016https://repository.ucatolica.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaCbdigital@metabiblioteca.com
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Improving bioethical decision-making with a little help from legal argumentation
title Improving bioethical decision-making with a little help from legal argumentation
spellingShingle Improving bioethical decision-making with a little help from legal argumentation
BIOETHICS
CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING
DELIBERATION
LEGAL ARGUMENTATION
ARGUMENTACIÓN JURÍDICA
BIOÉTICA
DELIBERACIÓN
TOMA DE DECISIONES CLÍNICAS
title_short Improving bioethical decision-making with a little help from legal argumentation
title_full Improving bioethical decision-making with a little help from legal argumentation
title_fullStr Improving bioethical decision-making with a little help from legal argumentation
title_full_unstemmed Improving bioethical decision-making with a little help from legal argumentation
title_sort Improving bioethical decision-making with a little help from legal argumentation
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Seoane, José Antonio
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Seoane, José Antonio
dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv BIOETHICS
CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING
DELIBERATION
LEGAL ARGUMENTATION
ARGUMENTACIÓN JURÍDICA
BIOÉTICA
DELIBERACIÓN
TOMA DE DECISIONES CLÍNICAS
topic BIOETHICS
CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING
DELIBERATION
LEGAL ARGUMENTATION
ARGUMENTACIÓN JURÍDICA
BIOÉTICA
DELIBERACIÓN
TOMA DE DECISIONES CLÍNICAS
description The most appropriate method for clinical decision-making is deliberation. The deliberative procedure aims to achieve wise and prudent decisions about health care taking into account facts, values and norms. Since deliberative reasoning is shared by healthcare professions, ethics and law, this paper introduces the structure and features of the bioethical deliberative procedure and suggests to improve it with some contributions from legal science and theories of argumentation.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.issued.spa.fl_str_mv 2016-01
dc.date.accessioned.spa.fl_str_mv 2019-06-10T21:09:08Z
dc.date.available.spa.fl_str_mv 2019-06-10T21:09:08Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.spa.fl_str_mv Seoane, J. (2016). Improving bioethical decision-making with a little help from legal argumentation. Soft Power, 3(1), 109-129. Recuperado de https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/ojsucatolica/revistas_ucatolica/index.php/SoftP/article/view/1801/1641
dc.identifier.issn.spa.fl_str_mv 2389-8232
dc.identifier.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10983/23198
identifier_str_mv Seoane, J. (2016). Improving bioethical decision-making with a little help from legal argumentation. Soft Power, 3(1), 109-129. Recuperado de https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/ojsucatolica/revistas_ucatolica/index.php/SoftP/article/view/1801/1641
2389-8232
url https://hdl.handle.net/10983/23198
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Soft Power, Vol. 3, no. 1 (ene.-jun. 2016); p. 109-129
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2016
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.creativecommons.spa.fl_str_mv Atribución-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-ND 4.0)
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2016
Atribución-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-ND 4.0)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Católica de Colombia. Facultad de Derecho
institution Universidad Católica de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/e0a1addb-a4b9-40c2-bd44-74d58fc443e3/download
https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/486f75ba-eb1b-474f-add8-214017004962/download
https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/80417e8b-09bb-41c5-95c7-4a56410336b4/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 4a36dbbdd25617116cf828932ad23c3d
492c5889d174ed6e954f0985b4e4cd43
2e5f288ec7db40905e605d4ceea79c84
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_ 1814256310399533056

Publicaciones similares