La competencia legítima para el monopolio estatal
The enchanted narration of representative regimes, despite their practice, today is so omnipotent that contradicting it is worthwhile. Deleting the rhetoric with which they legitimate themselves, the author shows the nature of government technique and dominion form that minimizes coercion. What come...
- Autores:
-
Mastropaolo, Alfio
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2016
- Institución:
- Universidad Católica de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/23178
- Acceso en línea:
- https://hdl.handle.net/10983/23178
- Palabra clave:
- RÉGIMEN
DOMINIO
PLURALISMO
INTERESES
CONTINGENCIA
REGIME
DOMINION
PLURALISM
INTERESTS
CONTINGENCY
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2016
| Summary: | The enchanted narration of representative regimes, despite their practice, today is so omnipotent that contradicting it is worthwhile. Deleting the rhetoric with which they legitimate themselves, the author shows the nature of government technique and dominion form that minimizes coercion. What comes to surface is a weave made of oscillations: between political synthesis of government action and recomposition of pluralism. |
|---|