Crime of aggression: expanding the relatively narrow parameters of Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute

La criminalización de la agresión, diametralmente opuesta a la noción de la soberanía del Estado, se mantuvo en un estado de animación suspendida hasta hace poco. A partir del 17 de julio de 2018, la Corte Penal Internacional ha sido facultada para juzgar a individuos por el crimen de agresión. Aunq...

Full description

Autores:
Godara, Karan
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2019
Institución:
Universidad Católica de Colombia
Repositorio:
RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/23613
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/10983/23613
Palabra clave:
ROME STATUTE
INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT (ICC)
CRIME OF AGGRESSION
KAMPALA REVIEW CONFERENCE
ESTATUTO DE ROMA
CORTE PENAL INTERNACIONAL (CPI)
CRIMEN DE AGRESIÓN
CONFERENCIA DE REVISIÓN DE KAMPALA
Rights
openAccess
License
Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2019
id UCATOLICA2_9cd0b6dbfb39252bd6cd887a60564949
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/23613
network_acronym_str UCATOLICA2
network_name_str RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Crime of aggression: expanding the relatively narrow parameters of Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv El crimen de agresión: ampliar los parámetros relativamente estrechos del Artículo 8 bis del Estatuto de Roma
title Crime of aggression: expanding the relatively narrow parameters of Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute
spellingShingle Crime of aggression: expanding the relatively narrow parameters of Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute
ROME STATUTE
INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT (ICC)
CRIME OF AGGRESSION
KAMPALA REVIEW CONFERENCE
ESTATUTO DE ROMA
CORTE PENAL INTERNACIONAL (CPI)
CRIMEN DE AGRESIÓN
CONFERENCIA DE REVISIÓN DE KAMPALA
title_short Crime of aggression: expanding the relatively narrow parameters of Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute
title_full Crime of aggression: expanding the relatively narrow parameters of Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute
title_fullStr Crime of aggression: expanding the relatively narrow parameters of Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute
title_full_unstemmed Crime of aggression: expanding the relatively narrow parameters of Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute
title_sort Crime of aggression: expanding the relatively narrow parameters of Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Godara, Karan
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Godara, Karan
dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv ROME STATUTE
INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT (ICC)
CRIME OF AGGRESSION
KAMPALA REVIEW CONFERENCE
ESTATUTO DE ROMA
CORTE PENAL INTERNACIONAL (CPI)
CRIMEN DE AGRESIÓN
CONFERENCIA DE REVISIÓN DE KAMPALA
topic ROME STATUTE
INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT (ICC)
CRIME OF AGGRESSION
KAMPALA REVIEW CONFERENCE
ESTATUTO DE ROMA
CORTE PENAL INTERNACIONAL (CPI)
CRIMEN DE AGRESIÓN
CONFERENCIA DE REVISIÓN DE KAMPALA
description La criminalización de la agresión, diametralmente opuesta a la noción de la soberanía del Estado, se mantuvo en un estado de animación suspendida hasta hace poco. A partir del 17 de julio de 2018, la Corte Penal Internacional ha sido facultada para juzgar a individuos por el crimen de agresión. Aunque el logro de esta hazaña es admirable en sí mismo, no se puede negar el hecho de que la definición adoptada en el Artículo 8 bis del Estatuto de Roma está anticuada. Siendo una síntesis de las disposiciones de dos documentos obsoletos del siglo XX, a saber, la Carta de Nuremberg (1945), por un lado, y la Resolución 3314 (XXIX) de la Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas (1974), por el otro, el Artículo 8 bis parece mal equipado para el propósito de manejar los desafíos de la nueva era que se están gestando en el siglo XXI. El autor buscó resumir la evolución del crimen de agresión como preludio para presentar el caso de que es necesario adoptar una definición mucho más incluyente dentro del esquema del Artículo 8 bis; es decir, es indispensable tener en cuenta las exigencias del siglo XXI que emanan de (a) medios de guerra no tradicionales, como la guerra cibernética; (b) entidades no estatales, como los grupos terroristas; y (c) actos internos de agresión.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.accessioned.spa.fl_str_mv 2019-08-28T01:08:31Z
dc.date.available.spa.fl_str_mv 2019-08-28T01:08:31Z
dc.date.issued.spa.fl_str_mv 2019-07
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.spa.fl_str_mv Godara, K. (2019). Crime of aggression: expanding the relatively narrow parameters of Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute. Novum Jus: Revista Especializada en Sociología Jurídica y Política, 13 (2), 145-159. Recuperado de https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/ojsucatolica/revistas_ucatolica/index.php/Juridica/article/view/2345/2614
dc.identifier.issn.spa.fl_str_mv 1692-6013
dc.identifier.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10983/23613
identifier_str_mv Godara, K. (2019). Crime of aggression: expanding the relatively narrow parameters of Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute. Novum Jus: Revista Especializada en Sociología Jurídica y Política, 13 (2), 145-159. Recuperado de https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/ojsucatolica/revistas_ucatolica/index.php/Juridica/article/view/2345/2614
1692-6013
url https://hdl.handle.net/10983/23613
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Novum Jus: Revista Especializada en Sociología Jurídica y Política; Vol. 13, no. 2 (jul.- dic. 2019); p. 145-159
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv Ambos, Kai. “The crime of aggression after Kampala.” German Yearbook of International Law 53 (2010).
Bachmann, Sascha-Dominik and Gerhard Kemp. “Aggression as ‘Organized Hypocrisy?’ – How the War on Terrorism and Hybrid Threats Challenge the Nuremberg Legacy.” The Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice, Vol. 30, No. 1. (2011). Available from: http:// dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1871912
Bantekas, Illias. International Criminal Law, 4th ed. (Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2010).
Cassese, Antonio. International Criminal Law, 2nd ed. (Oxford, 2008).
“Control Council Law No. 10.” Control Council for Germany 50-55 (1945). Available from: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/ffda62/pdf/
Ferencz, Benjamin B. “Address to the Diplomatic Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court.” Rome (June 16, 1998). Available from: http://www.derechos.org/nizkor/aggression/doc/bferencz6.html
Ferencz, Benjamin B. “Can Aggression Be Deterred by Law?” Pace International Law Review 11 (1999).
International Criminal Court, Assembly activates court’s jurisdiction over crime of aggression. Press release (Dec. 15, 2017). Available from: https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/item. aspx?name=pr1350
International Criminal Court. The Prosecutor v. Omar Hassan Ahmad Al Bashir, ICC- 02/05-01/09. Available from: https://www.icc-cpi.int/darfur/albashir
International Criminal Court. “Resolution ICC-ASP/8/Res.6.” (2009). Available from: https:// asp.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/asp_docs/Resolutions/ICC-ASP-8-Res.6-ENG.pdf
International Military Tribunal. Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal, Vol. 1. (Nuremberg: International Military Tribunal, 1947). Available from: https://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/NT_Vol-I.pdf
Kittichaisaree, Kriangsak. International Criminal Law, 1st ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).
McGuinness, Damien. “How a cyber attack transformed Estonia.” BBC News (Apr. 27, 2017). Available from: https://www.bbc.com/news/39655415
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (July 17, 1998). United Nations Treaty Collection. Available from: https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails. aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XVIII-10&chapter=18&lang=en
Scheffer, David. “The Missing Pieces in Article 8 bis (Aggression) of the Rome Statute.” Harvard International Law Journal 58 (2017). Available from: http://www.harvardilj. org/2017/04/the-missing-pieces-in-article-8-bis-aggression-of-the-rome-statute/
Statute of the International Military Tribunal (8 Aug. 1945, 82 UNTS 1951). The United States of America vs. Wilhelm von Leeb et al. (Nuremberg: US Military Tribunal, 1948).
United Nations. “Draft resolution of the Assembly of States Parties on the continuity of work in respect of the crime of aggression.” (2002). Available from: https://documents-dds-ny. un.org/doc/UNDOC/LTD/N02/472/04/PDF/N0247204.pdf?OpenElement
United Nations. Preparatory Commission for the International Criminal Court (1999-2002). Available from: http://legal.un.org/icc/prepcomm/prepfra.htm
United Nations. “Resolution RC/Res.6.” (2010). Available from: https://treaties.un.org/doc/ source/docs/RC-Res.6-ENG.pdf
United Nations General Assembly. “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly 3314 (XXIX). Definition of Aggression.” (Dec. 14, 1974). Available from: http://www. un-documents.net/a29r3314.htm
Werle, Gerhard and Florian Jessberger, Principles of International Criminal Law, 3rd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2019
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.creativecommons.spa.fl_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2019
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Católica de Colombia. Facultad de Derecho
institution Universidad Católica de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/38c033b0-e245-41fe-b652-c34643be02a6/download
https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/21fa3dde-c2c5-4c80-9f99-e250536f6afa/download
https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/14a2b8a5-c4f9-411a-80b3-37e929378b45/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 0bd7be2a9b173e08230f5c2a48a30e38
0b3daf624303420779a338c5ba326ad0
0a642766a1b8c0d77eed7fef7d2e0b37
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_ 1828173530092535808
spelling Godara, Karan70a15ef9-bdd6-4c64-8c59-c06477131b2f-12019-08-28T01:08:31Z2019-08-28T01:08:31Z2019-07La criminalización de la agresión, diametralmente opuesta a la noción de la soberanía del Estado, se mantuvo en un estado de animación suspendida hasta hace poco. A partir del 17 de julio de 2018, la Corte Penal Internacional ha sido facultada para juzgar a individuos por el crimen de agresión. Aunque el logro de esta hazaña es admirable en sí mismo, no se puede negar el hecho de que la definición adoptada en el Artículo 8 bis del Estatuto de Roma está anticuada. Siendo una síntesis de las disposiciones de dos documentos obsoletos del siglo XX, a saber, la Carta de Nuremberg (1945), por un lado, y la Resolución 3314 (XXIX) de la Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas (1974), por el otro, el Artículo 8 bis parece mal equipado para el propósito de manejar los desafíos de la nueva era que se están gestando en el siglo XXI. El autor buscó resumir la evolución del crimen de agresión como preludio para presentar el caso de que es necesario adoptar una definición mucho más incluyente dentro del esquema del Artículo 8 bis; es decir, es indispensable tener en cuenta las exigencias del siglo XXI que emanan de (a) medios de guerra no tradicionales, como la guerra cibernética; (b) entidades no estatales, como los grupos terroristas; y (c) actos internos de agresión.The criminalization of aggression, which is diametrically opposed to the notion of state sovereignty, has remained in a state of suspended animation until recently. Effective starting on July 17, 2018, the International Criminal Court has been empowered to try individuals for the crime of aggression. Although achieving this feat is commendable in itself, there is no denying the fact that the definition adopted under Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute is outmoded. Being a synthesis between the provisions of two outworn documents of the 20th century, namely the Nuremberg Charter (1945), on the one hand, and the United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3314 (XXIX) (1974), on the other, Article 8 bis seems ill-equipped for the purpose of handling new-age challenges brewing in the 21st century. The author has attempted to summarize the evolution of the crime of aggression as a prelude to presenting a case for the need to adopt a far more inclusive definition within the scheme of Article 8 bis, i.e. taking into consideration the exigencies of the 21st century emanating from (a) non-traditional means of warfare, such as cyberwarfare; (b) non-state entities, such as terrorist groups; and (c) internal acts of aggression.application/pdfGodara, K. (2019). Crime of aggression: expanding the relatively narrow parameters of Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute. Novum Jus: Revista Especializada en Sociología Jurídica y Política, 13 (2), 145-159. Recuperado de https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/ojsucatolica/revistas_ucatolica/index.php/Juridica/article/view/2345/26141692-6013https://hdl.handle.net/10983/23613engUniversidad Católica de Colombia. Facultad de DerechoNovum Jus: Revista Especializada en Sociología Jurídica y Política; Vol. 13, no. 2 (jul.- dic. 2019); p. 145-159Ambos, Kai. “The crime of aggression after Kampala.” German Yearbook of International Law 53 (2010).Bachmann, Sascha-Dominik and Gerhard Kemp. “Aggression as ‘Organized Hypocrisy?’ – How the War on Terrorism and Hybrid Threats Challenge the Nuremberg Legacy.” The Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice, Vol. 30, No. 1. (2011). Available from: http:// dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1871912Bantekas, Illias. International Criminal Law, 4th ed. (Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2010).Cassese, Antonio. International Criminal Law, 2nd ed. (Oxford, 2008).“Control Council Law No. 10.” Control Council for Germany 50-55 (1945). Available from: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/ffda62/pdf/Ferencz, Benjamin B. “Address to the Diplomatic Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court.” Rome (June 16, 1998). Available from: http://www.derechos.org/nizkor/aggression/doc/bferencz6.htmlFerencz, Benjamin B. “Can Aggression Be Deterred by Law?” Pace International Law Review 11 (1999).International Criminal Court, Assembly activates court’s jurisdiction over crime of aggression. Press release (Dec. 15, 2017). Available from: https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/item. aspx?name=pr1350International Criminal Court. The Prosecutor v. Omar Hassan Ahmad Al Bashir, ICC- 02/05-01/09. Available from: https://www.icc-cpi.int/darfur/albashirInternational Criminal Court. “Resolution ICC-ASP/8/Res.6.” (2009). Available from: https:// asp.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/asp_docs/Resolutions/ICC-ASP-8-Res.6-ENG.pdfInternational Military Tribunal. Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal, Vol. 1. (Nuremberg: International Military Tribunal, 1947). Available from: https://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/NT_Vol-I.pdfKittichaisaree, Kriangsak. International Criminal Law, 1st ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).McGuinness, Damien. “How a cyber attack transformed Estonia.” BBC News (Apr. 27, 2017). Available from: https://www.bbc.com/news/39655415Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (July 17, 1998). United Nations Treaty Collection. Available from: https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails. aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XVIII-10&chapter=18&lang=enScheffer, David. “The Missing Pieces in Article 8 bis (Aggression) of the Rome Statute.” Harvard International Law Journal 58 (2017). Available from: http://www.harvardilj. org/2017/04/the-missing-pieces-in-article-8-bis-aggression-of-the-rome-statute/Statute of the International Military Tribunal (8 Aug. 1945, 82 UNTS 1951). The United States of America vs. Wilhelm von Leeb et al. (Nuremberg: US Military Tribunal, 1948).United Nations. “Draft resolution of the Assembly of States Parties on the continuity of work in respect of the crime of aggression.” (2002). Available from: https://documents-dds-ny. un.org/doc/UNDOC/LTD/N02/472/04/PDF/N0247204.pdf?OpenElementUnited Nations. Preparatory Commission for the International Criminal Court (1999-2002). Available from: http://legal.un.org/icc/prepcomm/prepfra.htmUnited Nations. “Resolution RC/Res.6.” (2010). Available from: https://treaties.un.org/doc/ source/docs/RC-Res.6-ENG.pdfUnited Nations General Assembly. “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly 3314 (XXIX). Definition of Aggression.” (Dec. 14, 1974). Available from: http://www. un-documents.net/a29r3314.htmWerle, Gerhard and Florian Jessberger, Principles of International Criminal Law, 3rd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2019info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2ROME STATUTEINTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT (ICC)CRIME OF AGGRESSIONKAMPALA REVIEW CONFERENCEESTATUTO DE ROMACORTE PENAL INTERNACIONAL (CPI)CRIMEN DE AGRESIÓNCONFERENCIA DE REVISIÓN DE KAMPALACrime of aggression: expanding the relatively narrow parameters of Article 8 bis of the Rome StatuteEl crimen de agresión: ampliar los parámetros relativamente estrechos del Artículo 8 bis del Estatuto de RomaArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85PublicationORIGINALCrime of aggression.pdfCrime of aggression.pdfCrime of aggressionapplication/pdf930104https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/38c033b0-e245-41fe-b652-c34643be02a6/download0bd7be2a9b173e08230f5c2a48a30e38MD51TEXTCrime of aggression.pdf.txtCrime of aggression.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain40003https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/21fa3dde-c2c5-4c80-9f99-e250536f6afa/download0b3daf624303420779a338c5ba326ad0MD52THUMBNAILCrime of aggression.pdf.jpgCrime of aggression.pdf.jpgRIUCACimage/jpeg51894https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/14a2b8a5-c4f9-411a-80b3-37e929378b45/download0a642766a1b8c0d77eed7fef7d2e0b37MD5310983/23613oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/236132023-03-24 18:15:46.682https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2019https://repository.ucatolica.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaCbdigital@metabiblioteca.com