Análisis factorial de la Escala Situacional de Empatía Emocional en una muestra universitaria chilena
La preocupación empática y angustia personal son los componentes emocionales de la empatía según los modelos más utilizados. Estos componentes pueden conceptualizarse en forma disposicional o situacional. Los análisis previos tienden a considerar escalas disposicionales con escasa evidencia para las...
- Autores:
-
Landabur-Ayala, Rodrigo Antonio
Miguez-Cavieres, Gonzalo Javier
Laborda-Rojas, Mario Arturo
Salinas-Chaud, María
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of investigation
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2023
- Institución:
- Universidad Católica de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/30503
- Palabra clave:
- preocupación empática
angustia personal
análisis factorial
Empatía
Empathic concern
personal distress
Confirmatory factor analysis
empathy
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Acta Colombiana de Psicología - 2023
| id |
UCATOLICA2_99a0def5d7c1ba6124351b41ea8372ae |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/30503 |
| network_acronym_str |
UCATOLICA2 |
| network_name_str |
RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Análisis factorial de la Escala Situacional de Empatía Emocional en una muestra universitaria chilena |
| dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv |
Factor Analysis of the Situational Scale of Emotional Empathy in a University Chilean Sample |
| title |
Análisis factorial de la Escala Situacional de Empatía Emocional en una muestra universitaria chilena |
| spellingShingle |
Análisis factorial de la Escala Situacional de Empatía Emocional en una muestra universitaria chilena preocupación empática angustia personal análisis factorial Empatía Empathic concern personal distress Confirmatory factor analysis empathy |
| title_short |
Análisis factorial de la Escala Situacional de Empatía Emocional en una muestra universitaria chilena |
| title_full |
Análisis factorial de la Escala Situacional de Empatía Emocional en una muestra universitaria chilena |
| title_fullStr |
Análisis factorial de la Escala Situacional de Empatía Emocional en una muestra universitaria chilena |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Análisis factorial de la Escala Situacional de Empatía Emocional en una muestra universitaria chilena |
| title_sort |
Análisis factorial de la Escala Situacional de Empatía Emocional en una muestra universitaria chilena |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Landabur-Ayala, Rodrigo Antonio Miguez-Cavieres, Gonzalo Javier Laborda-Rojas, Mario Arturo Salinas-Chaud, María |
| dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv |
Landabur-Ayala, Rodrigo Antonio Miguez-Cavieres, Gonzalo Javier Laborda-Rojas, Mario Arturo Salinas-Chaud, María |
| dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv |
preocupación empática angustia personal análisis factorial Empatía |
| topic |
preocupación empática angustia personal análisis factorial Empatía Empathic concern personal distress Confirmatory factor analysis empathy |
| dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Empathic concern personal distress Confirmatory factor analysis empathy |
| description |
La preocupación empática y angustia personal son los componentes emocionales de la empatía según los modelos más utilizados. Estos componentes pueden conceptualizarse en forma disposicional o situacional. Los análisis previos tienden a considerar escalas disposicionales con escasa evidencia para las situacionales. El presente estudio analizó la estructura factorial de la Escala Situacional de la Empatía Emocional, compuesta por la preocupación empática y angustia personal. En una muestra a conveniencia de estudiantes universitarias/os chilenos/as (N = 539), se analizó el ajuste de primer y segundo orden de la escala mediante análisis factorial. Los resultados indicaron un buen (χ2 /gl = 4.189, cfi = .964, tli = .932, srmr = .042, rmsea = .086, aic = 12041.418, bic = 12097.185) y mejor ajuste del modelo de segundo orden (χ2 diferencia(1) = 16.689, p < .001, |δcfi| = .237, |Δrmsea| = .636, y |Δsrmr| = .076, todos > .01, |Δaic| = 211.633 > 10, y |δbic| = 207.342 > 10), mientras que el de un orden no mostró un buen ajuste (χ2 /gl = 20.878, cfi = .727, tli = .544, srmr = .118, rmsea = .224, aic = 12253.051, bic = 12304.527). Los resultados fueron consistentes con la literatura. Se discute la necesidad de nuevas evidencias de validez y el uso de muestras más representativas. |
| publishDate |
2023 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-05-29 15:54:25 2023-07-23T17:34:00Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-05-29 15:54:25 2023-07-23T17:34:00Z |
| dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-05-29 |
| dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de revista |
| dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
| dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv |
Text |
| dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv |
Journal article |
| dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART |
| dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.14718/ACP.2023.26.2.7 |
| dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv |
1909-9711 |
| dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
0123-9155 |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/10983/30503 |
| dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2023.26.2.7 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.14718/ACP.2023.26.2.7 1909-9711 0123-9155 |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10983/30503 https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2023.26.2.7 |
| dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv |
https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/4473/4672 |
| dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv |
Núm. 2 , Año 2023 : Acta Colombiana de Psicología |
| dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv |
86 |
| dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv |
2 |
| dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv |
76 |
| dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv |
26 |
| dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Acta Colombiana de Psicología |
| dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv |
Alexandre, N., Gallasch, C., Lima, M., & Rodrigues, R. (2013). A confiabilidade no desenvolvimento e avaliação de instrumentos de medida na área da saúde. Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem, 15(3), 802-809. http://dx. doi.org/10.5216/ree.v15i3.20776 Ambrona, T., Oceja, L., López-Pérez, B., & Carrera, P. (2016). Can empathic concern be generalized from one person to others? Another positive side of the ‘one-among-others’ effect. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 57(6), 547- 553. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12316 Baez, S., Flichtentrei, D., Prats, M., Mastandueno, R., García, A. M., Cetkovich, M., & Ibáñez, A. (2017). Men, women. . . who cares? A population based study on sex differences and gender roles in empathy and moral cognition. PLoS one, 12(6), Artículo e0179336. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179336 Batson, C. D. (2011). The empathy-altruism hypothesis. En C. D. Batson (Ed.), Altruism in humans (1.a ed.) (pp. 11- 32). Oxford University Press. Batson, C. D., Chang, J., Orr, R., & Rowland, J. (2002). Empathy, attitudes and action: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group motivate one to help the group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1656-1666. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616702237647 Batson, C. D., Duncan, B. D., Ackerman, P., Buckley, T., & Birch, K. (1981). Is empathic emotion a source of altruistic motivation? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(2), 290-302. https://doi. org/10.1037/0022-3514.40.2.290 Batson, C. D., Fultz, J., & Schoenrade, P. A. (1987). Distress and empathy: Two qualitatively distinct vicarious emotions with different motivational consequences. Journal of Personality, 55(1), 19-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1987.tb00426.x Batson, C. D., Lishner, D., & Stocks, (2015). The empathy-altruism hypothesis. En D. Shroeder & W. Graziano (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Prosocial Behavior (pp. 259-281). Oxford University Press. Batson, C. D., Sager, K., Garst, E., Kang, M., Rubchinsky, K., & Dawson, K. (1997). Is empathy-induced helping due to self other merging? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(3), 495-509. https://doi. org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.495 Batson, C. D., Turk, C. L., Shaw, L. L., & Klein, T. R. (1995). Information function of empathic emotion: Learning that we value the other’s welfare. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(2), 300-313. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.300 Beechler, M. (2018). Revisiting the egoism-altruism debate: Effects of contextual cues on empathy, oneness, and helping intentions. North American Journal of Psychology, 20(1), 23-35. https://www.proquest.com/ docview/2041124899 Berry, J. W. (1980). Introduction to Methodology. En H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Vol. 2. Methodology (pp. 1-29). Allyn & Bacon. Carrera, P., Oceja, L., Caballero, A., Muñoz, D., LópezPérez, B., & Ambrona, T. (2013). I feel so sorry! Tapping the joint influence of empathy and personal distress on helping behavior. Motivation and Emotion, 37(2), 335- 345. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-012-9302-9 Cialdini, R. B., Brown, S., Lewis, B., Luce, C., & Neuberg, S. (1997). Reinterpreting the empathy-altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(3), 481-494. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.481 Coke, J. S., Batson, C. D., & McDavis, K. (1978). Empathic mediation of helping: A two-stage model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(7), 752-766. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.7.752 Cuff, B. M. P., Brown, S. J., Taylor, L., & Howat, D. J. (2016). Empathy: A review of the concept. Emotion Review, 8(2), 144-153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914558466. Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85-103. https://www. uv.es/~friasnav/Davis_1980.pdf Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113-126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113 Davis, M. H. (2015). Empathy and prosocial behavior. En D. A. Schroeder & W. G. Graziano (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Prosocial Behavior (pp. 282- 306). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ oxfordhb/9780195399813.013.026 Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review in Psychology, 51, 665-697. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.665 Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Murphy, B., Karbon, M., Maszk, P., Smith, M., O´Boyle, C., & Suh, K. (1994). The relations of emotionality and regulation to dispositional and situational empathy-related responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(4), 776-797. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.776 Fabi, S., Weber, L. A., & Leuthold, H. (2019). Empathic concern and personal distress depend on situational but not dispositional factors. PLoS one, 14(11), Artículo e0225102. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225102 FeldmanHall, O., Dalgleish, T., Evans, D., & Mobbs, D. (2015). Empathic concern drives costly altruism. Neuroimage, 105, 347-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. neuroimage.2014.10.043 Ferreira-Valente, A., Costa, P., Elorduy, M., Virumbrales, M., Costa, M. J., & Palés, J. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy: Making sense of the total score through a second order confirmatory factor analysis. bmc Medical Education, 16, Artículo 242. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s12909-016-0763-5 Fultz, J., Schaller, M., & Cialdini, R. (1988). Empathy, sadness, and distress: Three related but distinct vicarious affective responses to another’s suffering. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14(2), 312-325. https:// doi.org/10.1177/014616728801400201 Garcia-Barrera, M. A., Karr, J. E., Trujillo-Orrego, N., Trujillo-Orrego, S., & Pineda, D. A. (2017). Evaluating empathy in Colombian ex-combatants: Examination of the internal structure of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (iri) in Spanish. Psychological Assessment, 29(1), 116-122. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000331 Gazzaniga, M. S., & LeDoux, J. E. (1978). The integrated mind. Springer. Goetz, J. L., Keltner, D., & Simon-Thomas, E. (2010). Compassion: An evolutionary analysis and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 351-374. https:// doi.org/10.1037/a0018807 Gómez-Tabares, A., & Narváez, M. (2020). Tendencias prosociales y su relación con la empatía y la autoeficacia emocional en adolescentes en vulnerabilidad psicosocial. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 29(2), 125-147. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v29n2.78430 Graziano, W., Habashi, M., Sheese, B., & Tobin, R. (2007). Agreeableness, empathy, and helping: A person X situation perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(4), 583-599. https://doi. org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.583 Grevenstein, D. (2020). Factorial validity and measurement invariance across gender groups of the German version of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index. Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences, 2, Artículo 8. https:// doi.org/10.1186/s42409-020-00015-2 Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1999). Análisis multivariante (5.a ed.). Prentice Hall. Hall, J., & Schwartz, R. (2019). Empathy present and future. The Journal of Social Psychology, 159(3), 225-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2018.1477442 Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not weird. Nature, 466(7302), Artículo 29. https://www.nature.com/articles/466029a Hodges, S. D., Kiel, K. J., Kramer, A. D. I., Veach, D., & Villanueva, B. R. (2010). Giving birth to empathy: The effects of similar experience on empathic accuracy, empathic concern, and perceived empathy. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(3), 398-409. https://doi. org/10.1177/0146167209350326 Kass, R., & Raftery, A. (1995). Bayes factor. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(430), 773-779. https://doi.org/10.2307/2291091 Kenny, D. (2020, 5 de junio). Measuring Model Fit. http:// www.davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm Kerr-Gaffney, J., Harrison, A., & Tchanturia, K. (2019). Cognitive and affective empathy in eating disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, Artículo 102. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyt.2019.00102 Kong, F. (2017). The validity of the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale in a Chinese sample: Tests of measurement invariance and latent mean differences across gender and age. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 29-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.025 Kruger, D. (2003). Evolution and altruism. Combining psychological mediators with naturally selected tendencies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24(2), 118-125. https:// doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00156-3 Light, S. N., Moran, Z. D., Swander, L., Le, V., Cage, B., Burghy, C., Westbrook, C., Greishar, L., & Davidson, R. (2015). Electromyographically assessed empathic concern and empathic happiness predict increased prosocial behavior in adults. Biological Psychology, 104, 116-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.11.015 Lima, K. E. F., Freire, G. L. M., Sousa, V. C., Contreira, A. R., Moraes, J. F. V. N. D., & Nascimento Junior, J. R. A. (2022). Adaptation and psychometric properties of the Self Report Emotional Intelligence Test (sseit) among Brazilian athletes. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 25(1), 121-136. https://www.doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2022.25.1.9 López-Pérez, B., Carrera, P., Ambrona, T., & Oceja, L. (2014). Testing the qualitative differences between empathy and personal distress: Measuring core affect and self-orientation. The Social Science Journal, 51(4), 676- 680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2014.08.001 López-Pérez, B., Carrera, P., Oceja, L., Ambrona, T., & Stocks, E. (2019). Sympathy and tenderness as components of dispositional empathic concern: Predicting helping and caring behaviors. Current Psychology, 38, 458- 468. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9615-7 Lucas-Molina, B., Pérez-Albéniz, A., Ortuño-Sierra, J., & Fonseca-Pedrero, E. (2017). Dimensional structure and measurement invariance of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (iri) across gender. Psicothema, 29(4), 590-595. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2017.19 Maner, J., & Gailliot, M. (2007). Altruism and egoism: Prosocial motivations for helping depend on relationship context. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(2), 347-358. http://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.364 Maner, J., Luce, C., Neuberg, S., Cialdini, R., Brown, S., & Sagarin, B. (2002). The effects of perspective taking on motivations for helping: Still no evidence for altruism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(11), 1601-1610. http://doi.org/10.1177/014616702237586 Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57(3), 519- 530. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biomet/57.3.519 McAuliffe, W. H. B., Forster, D. E., Phillippe, J., & McCullough, M. E. (2018). Digital altruists: Resolving key questions about the empathy-altruism hypothesis in an internet sample. Emotion, 18(4), 493-506. http://doi. org/10.1037/emo0000375 Miaja, M., Moral, J., Fonseca, A., Cruz, M., Villarreal, C., Becerril, A., Vaca, B., & Guajardo, F. (2021). Factor structure, internal consistency and distribution of Female Sexual Function Index among Mexican women with early diagnostic of breast cancer. Psicooncología, 18(2), 293-316. https://dx.doi.org/10.5209/psic.77755 Mikulincer, M., Gillath, O., Halevy, V., Avihou, N., Avidan, S., & Eshkoli, N. (2001). Attachment theory and reactions to others’ needs: Evidence that activation of the sense of attachment security promotes empathic responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1205-1224. https://doi. org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1205 Ministero, L. M., Poulin, M. J., Buffone, A. E., & DeLury, S. (2018). Empathic concern and the desire to help as separable components of compassionate responding. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(4), 475- 491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217741345 Mohsin, N., Mourad, G., Faure, M., Szawarc, I., & Bringer, J. (2013). Metabolic syndrome performs better than the individual factors in predicting renal graft outcome. Transplantation Proceedings, 45(10), 3517-3519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.09.013 Montero, I., & León, O. G. (2002). Clasificación y descripción de las metodologías de investigación en Psicología. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 2(3), 503-508. http://www.aepc.es/ijchp/articulos_pdf/ijchp-53.pdf. Murphy, B. A., Costello, T. H., Watts, A. L., Cheong, Y. F., Berg, J. M., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2020). Strengths and weaknesses of two empathy measures: A comparison of the measurement precision, construct validity, and incremental validity of two multidimensional indices. Assessment, 27(2), 246-260. https://doi. org/10.1177/1073191118777636 Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus User’s Guide (8.a ed.). Muthén & Muthén. Myers, M., Laurent, S., & Hodges, S. (2014). Perspective taking instructions and self-other overlap: Different motives for helping. Motivation and Emotion, 38, 224-234. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-013-9377-y Oceja, L. V., Heerdink, M. W., Stocks, E. L., Ambrona, T., López-Pérez, B., & Salgado, S. (2014). Empathy, awareness of others, and action: How feeling empathy for oneamong-others motivates helping the others. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 36(2), 111-124. https://doi. org/10.1080/01973533.2013.856787 Oceja, L., & Jiménez, I. (2007). Beyond egoism and group identity: Empathy toward the other and awareness of others in a social dilemma. The Spanish Journal of Social Psychology, 10(2), 369-379. https://doi.org/10.1017/ s1138741600006636 Pérez-Albéniz, A., De Paúl, J., Etxeberría, J., Montes, M. P., & Torres, E. (2003). Adaptación de interpersonal reactivity index (iri) al español. Psicothema, 15(2), 267- 272. https://www.psicothema.com/pdf/1056.pdf Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02 Ruiz, S., & Madariaga, R. (2018). Historical and recent large megathrust earthquakes in Chile. Tectonophysics, 733, 37-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2018.01.015 Schreiber, J. B. (2017). Update to core reporting practices in structural equation modeling. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 13(3), 634-643. http://doi. org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.06.006 Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323-337. http:// doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338 Silke, C., Brady, B., Boylan, C., & Dolan, P. (2018). Factors influencing the development of empathy and prosocial behaviour among adolescents: A systematic review. Children and Youth Services Review, 94, 421-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.07.027 Stocks, E. L., Lishner, D. A., & Decker, S. K. (2009). Altruism or psychological escape: Why does empathy promote social behaviour? European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(5), 649-665. https://doi.org/10.1002/ ejsp.561 Stürmer, S., Snyder, M., Kropp, A., & Siem, B. (2006). Empathy motivated helping: The moderating role of group membership. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(7), 943-956. https://doi. org/10.1177/0146167206287363 Swann, Jr., W. B., Gómez, Á., Dovidio, J., Hart, S., & Jetten, J. (2010). Dying and killing for one’s group: Identity fusion moderates’ responses to intergroup versions of the trolley problem. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1176- 1183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610376656 Verhofstadt, L., Devoldre, I., Buysse, A., Stevens, M., Hinnekens, C., Ickes, W., & Davis, M. (2016). The role of cognitive and affective empathy in spouses’ support interactions: An observational study. PLos one, 11(2), Artículo e0149944. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0149944 Wolgast, A., Tandler, N., Harrison, L., & Umlauft, S. (2019). Adults’ dispositional and situational perspective-taking: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 353-389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09507-y Zhao, X., Li, X., Song, Y., & Shi, W. (2019). Autistic traits and prosocial behaviour in the general population: Test of the mediating effects of trait empathy and state empathic concern. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49(10), 3925-3938. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10803-018-3745-0 Zych, I., Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. (2019). Empathy and callous unemotional traits in different bullying roles: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 20(1), 3-21. https://doi. org/10.1177/1524838016683456 |
| dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv |
Acta Colombiana de Psicología - 2023 |
| dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Acta Colombiana de Psicología - 2023 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Católica de Colombia |
| dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/4473 |
| institution |
Universidad Católica de Colombia |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/b7dd4529-e4bc-462e-8aa7-65bc86460ef9/download |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
88771a199df3f3bad92c6b0f4a548085 |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaC |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdigital@metabiblioteca.com |
| _version_ |
1812183290503757824 |
| spelling |
Landabur-Ayala, Rodrigo Antonio5673ca5d-f0c6-4ff0-a533-93eafe14758fMiguez-Cavieres, Gonzalo Javierb6950951-0e19-4041-b578-0ca7f2008038Laborda-Rojas, Mario Arturo9ade508d-d8a6-4f9f-beed-f19ba37c5888Salinas-Chaud, María8778973e-22b1-4534-8bf9-2d8d2f5741cf2023-05-29 15:54:252023-07-23T17:34:00Z2023-05-29 15:54:252023-07-23T17:34:00Z2023-05-29La preocupación empática y angustia personal son los componentes emocionales de la empatía según los modelos más utilizados. Estos componentes pueden conceptualizarse en forma disposicional o situacional. Los análisis previos tienden a considerar escalas disposicionales con escasa evidencia para las situacionales. El presente estudio analizó la estructura factorial de la Escala Situacional de la Empatía Emocional, compuesta por la preocupación empática y angustia personal. En una muestra a conveniencia de estudiantes universitarias/os chilenos/as (N = 539), se analizó el ajuste de primer y segundo orden de la escala mediante análisis factorial. Los resultados indicaron un buen (χ2 /gl = 4.189, cfi = .964, tli = .932, srmr = .042, rmsea = .086, aic = 12041.418, bic = 12097.185) y mejor ajuste del modelo de segundo orden (χ2 diferencia(1) = 16.689, p < .001, |δcfi| = .237, |Δrmsea| = .636, y |Δsrmr| = .076, todos > .01, |Δaic| = 211.633 > 10, y |δbic| = 207.342 > 10), mientras que el de un orden no mostró un buen ajuste (χ2 /gl = 20.878, cfi = .727, tli = .544, srmr = .118, rmsea = .224, aic = 12253.051, bic = 12304.527). Los resultados fueron consistentes con la literatura. Se discute la necesidad de nuevas evidencias de validez y el uso de muestras más representativas.Empathic concern and personal distress are the emotional components of empathy according to most utilized models. These components can be conceptualized in a dispositional or situational form. Previous analyzes tend to consider dispositional scales, with little evidence for situational ones. The present study analyzed the factor structure of a situational scale of emotional empathy, composed of empathic concern and personal distress. In a convenience sample of Chilean university students (N = 539), the one-order and second-order fit of the scale was analyzed using factor analysis. The results indicated a good (χ2 / gl = 4.189, cfi = .964, tli = .932, srmr = .042, rmsea = .086, aic = 12041.418, bic = 12097.185) and better (χ2 difference(1) = 16.689, p < .001, |δcfi| = .237, |Δrmsea| = .636, y |δsrmr| = .076, all of them > .01, |δaic| = 211.633 > 10, y |Δbic| = 207.342 > 10) second-order fit while one-order did not show a good fit (χ2 /gl = 20.878, cfi = .727, tli = .544, srmr = .118, rmsea = .224, aic = 12253.051, bic = 12304.527). The results were consistent with the literature. The need for new types of validity and the use of more representative samples was discussed.application/pdf10.14718/ACP.2023.26.2.71909-97110123-9155https://hdl.handle.net/10983/30503https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2023.26.2.7spaUniversidad Católica de Colombiahttps://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/4473/4672Núm. 2 , Año 2023 : Acta Colombiana de Psicología8627626Acta Colombiana de PsicologíaAlexandre, N., Gallasch, C., Lima, M., & Rodrigues, R. (2013). A confiabilidade no desenvolvimento e avaliação de instrumentos de medida na área da saúde. Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem, 15(3), 802-809. http://dx. doi.org/10.5216/ree.v15i3.20776 Ambrona, T., Oceja, L., López-Pérez, B., & Carrera, P. (2016). Can empathic concern be generalized from one person to others? Another positive side of the ‘one-among-others’ effect. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 57(6), 547- 553. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12316 Baez, S., Flichtentrei, D., Prats, M., Mastandueno, R., García, A. M., Cetkovich, M., & Ibáñez, A. (2017). Men, women. . . who cares? A population based study on sex differences and gender roles in empathy and moral cognition. PLoS one, 12(6), Artículo e0179336. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179336 Batson, C. D. (2011). The empathy-altruism hypothesis. En C. D. Batson (Ed.), Altruism in humans (1.a ed.) (pp. 11- 32). Oxford University Press. Batson, C. D., Chang, J., Orr, R., & Rowland, J. (2002). Empathy, attitudes and action: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group motivate one to help the group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1656-1666. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616702237647 Batson, C. D., Duncan, B. D., Ackerman, P., Buckley, T., & Birch, K. (1981). Is empathic emotion a source of altruistic motivation? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(2), 290-302. https://doi. org/10.1037/0022-3514.40.2.290 Batson, C. D., Fultz, J., & Schoenrade, P. A. (1987). Distress and empathy: Two qualitatively distinct vicarious emotions with different motivational consequences. Journal of Personality, 55(1), 19-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1987.tb00426.x Batson, C. D., Lishner, D., & Stocks, (2015). The empathy-altruism hypothesis. En D. Shroeder & W. Graziano (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Prosocial Behavior (pp. 259-281). Oxford University Press. Batson, C. D., Sager, K., Garst, E., Kang, M., Rubchinsky, K., & Dawson, K. (1997). Is empathy-induced helping due to self other merging? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(3), 495-509. https://doi. org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.495 Batson, C. D., Turk, C. L., Shaw, L. L., & Klein, T. R. (1995). Information function of empathic emotion: Learning that we value the other’s welfare. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(2), 300-313. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.300 Beechler, M. (2018). Revisiting the egoism-altruism debate: Effects of contextual cues on empathy, oneness, and helping intentions. North American Journal of Psychology, 20(1), 23-35. https://www.proquest.com/ docview/2041124899 Berry, J. W. (1980). Introduction to Methodology. En H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Vol. 2. Methodology (pp. 1-29). Allyn & Bacon. Carrera, P., Oceja, L., Caballero, A., Muñoz, D., LópezPérez, B., & Ambrona, T. (2013). I feel so sorry! Tapping the joint influence of empathy and personal distress on helping behavior. Motivation and Emotion, 37(2), 335- 345. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-012-9302-9 Cialdini, R. B., Brown, S., Lewis, B., Luce, C., & Neuberg, S. (1997). Reinterpreting the empathy-altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(3), 481-494. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.481 Coke, J. S., Batson, C. D., & McDavis, K. (1978). Empathic mediation of helping: A two-stage model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(7), 752-766. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.7.752 Cuff, B. M. P., Brown, S. J., Taylor, L., & Howat, D. J. (2016). Empathy: A review of the concept. Emotion Review, 8(2), 144-153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914558466. Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85-103. https://www. uv.es/~friasnav/Davis_1980.pdf Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113-126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113 Davis, M. H. (2015). Empathy and prosocial behavior. En D. A. Schroeder & W. G. Graziano (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Prosocial Behavior (pp. 282- 306). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ oxfordhb/9780195399813.013.026 Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review in Psychology, 51, 665-697. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.665 Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Murphy, B., Karbon, M., Maszk, P., Smith, M., O´Boyle, C., & Suh, K. (1994). The relations of emotionality and regulation to dispositional and situational empathy-related responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(4), 776-797. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.776 Fabi, S., Weber, L. A., & Leuthold, H. (2019). Empathic concern and personal distress depend on situational but not dispositional factors. PLoS one, 14(11), Artículo e0225102. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225102 FeldmanHall, O., Dalgleish, T., Evans, D., & Mobbs, D. (2015). Empathic concern drives costly altruism. Neuroimage, 105, 347-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. neuroimage.2014.10.043 Ferreira-Valente, A., Costa, P., Elorduy, M., Virumbrales, M., Costa, M. J., & Palés, J. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy: Making sense of the total score through a second order confirmatory factor analysis. bmc Medical Education, 16, Artículo 242. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s12909-016-0763-5 Fultz, J., Schaller, M., & Cialdini, R. (1988). Empathy, sadness, and distress: Three related but distinct vicarious affective responses to another’s suffering. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14(2), 312-325. https:// doi.org/10.1177/014616728801400201 Garcia-Barrera, M. A., Karr, J. E., Trujillo-Orrego, N., Trujillo-Orrego, S., & Pineda, D. A. (2017). Evaluating empathy in Colombian ex-combatants: Examination of the internal structure of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (iri) in Spanish. Psychological Assessment, 29(1), 116-122. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000331 Gazzaniga, M. S., & LeDoux, J. E. (1978). The integrated mind. Springer. Goetz, J. L., Keltner, D., & Simon-Thomas, E. (2010). Compassion: An evolutionary analysis and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 351-374. https:// doi.org/10.1037/a0018807 Gómez-Tabares, A., & Narváez, M. (2020). Tendencias prosociales y su relación con la empatía y la autoeficacia emocional en adolescentes en vulnerabilidad psicosocial. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 29(2), 125-147. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v29n2.78430 Graziano, W., Habashi, M., Sheese, B., & Tobin, R. (2007). Agreeableness, empathy, and helping: A person X situation perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(4), 583-599. https://doi. org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.583 Grevenstein, D. (2020). Factorial validity and measurement invariance across gender groups of the German version of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index. Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences, 2, Artículo 8. https:// doi.org/10.1186/s42409-020-00015-2 Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1999). Análisis multivariante (5.a ed.). Prentice Hall. Hall, J., & Schwartz, R. (2019). Empathy present and future. The Journal of Social Psychology, 159(3), 225-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2018.1477442 Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not weird. Nature, 466(7302), Artículo 29. https://www.nature.com/articles/466029a Hodges, S. D., Kiel, K. J., Kramer, A. D. I., Veach, D., & Villanueva, B. R. (2010). Giving birth to empathy: The effects of similar experience on empathic accuracy, empathic concern, and perceived empathy. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(3), 398-409. https://doi. org/10.1177/0146167209350326 Kass, R., & Raftery, A. (1995). Bayes factor. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(430), 773-779. https://doi.org/10.2307/2291091 Kenny, D. (2020, 5 de junio). Measuring Model Fit. http:// www.davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm Kerr-Gaffney, J., Harrison, A., & Tchanturia, K. (2019). Cognitive and affective empathy in eating disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, Artículo 102. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyt.2019.00102 Kong, F. (2017). The validity of the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale in a Chinese sample: Tests of measurement invariance and latent mean differences across gender and age. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 29-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.025 Kruger, D. (2003). Evolution and altruism. Combining psychological mediators with naturally selected tendencies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24(2), 118-125. https:// doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00156-3 Light, S. N., Moran, Z. D., Swander, L., Le, V., Cage, B., Burghy, C., Westbrook, C., Greishar, L., & Davidson, R. (2015). Electromyographically assessed empathic concern and empathic happiness predict increased prosocial behavior in adults. Biological Psychology, 104, 116-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.11.015 Lima, K. E. F., Freire, G. L. M., Sousa, V. C., Contreira, A. R., Moraes, J. F. V. N. D., & Nascimento Junior, J. R. A. (2022). Adaptation and psychometric properties of the Self Report Emotional Intelligence Test (sseit) among Brazilian athletes. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 25(1), 121-136. https://www.doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2022.25.1.9 López-Pérez, B., Carrera, P., Ambrona, T., & Oceja, L. (2014). Testing the qualitative differences between empathy and personal distress: Measuring core affect and self-orientation. The Social Science Journal, 51(4), 676- 680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2014.08.001 López-Pérez, B., Carrera, P., Oceja, L., Ambrona, T., & Stocks, E. (2019). Sympathy and tenderness as components of dispositional empathic concern: Predicting helping and caring behaviors. Current Psychology, 38, 458- 468. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9615-7 Lucas-Molina, B., Pérez-Albéniz, A., Ortuño-Sierra, J., & Fonseca-Pedrero, E. (2017). Dimensional structure and measurement invariance of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (iri) across gender. Psicothema, 29(4), 590-595. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2017.19 Maner, J., & Gailliot, M. (2007). Altruism and egoism: Prosocial motivations for helping depend on relationship context. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(2), 347-358. http://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.364 Maner, J., Luce, C., Neuberg, S., Cialdini, R., Brown, S., & Sagarin, B. (2002). The effects of perspective taking on motivations for helping: Still no evidence for altruism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(11), 1601-1610. http://doi.org/10.1177/014616702237586 Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57(3), 519- 530. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biomet/57.3.519 McAuliffe, W. H. B., Forster, D. E., Phillippe, J., & McCullough, M. E. (2018). Digital altruists: Resolving key questions about the empathy-altruism hypothesis in an internet sample. Emotion, 18(4), 493-506. http://doi. org/10.1037/emo0000375 Miaja, M., Moral, J., Fonseca, A., Cruz, M., Villarreal, C., Becerril, A., Vaca, B., & Guajardo, F. (2021). Factor structure, internal consistency and distribution of Female Sexual Function Index among Mexican women with early diagnostic of breast cancer. Psicooncología, 18(2), 293-316. https://dx.doi.org/10.5209/psic.77755 Mikulincer, M., Gillath, O., Halevy, V., Avihou, N., Avidan, S., & Eshkoli, N. (2001). Attachment theory and reactions to others’ needs: Evidence that activation of the sense of attachment security promotes empathic responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1205-1224. https://doi. org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1205 Ministero, L. M., Poulin, M. J., Buffone, A. E., & DeLury, S. (2018). Empathic concern and the desire to help as separable components of compassionate responding. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(4), 475- 491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217741345 Mohsin, N., Mourad, G., Faure, M., Szawarc, I., & Bringer, J. (2013). Metabolic syndrome performs better than the individual factors in predicting renal graft outcome. Transplantation Proceedings, 45(10), 3517-3519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.09.013 Montero, I., & León, O. G. (2002). Clasificación y descripción de las metodologías de investigación en Psicología. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 2(3), 503-508. http://www.aepc.es/ijchp/articulos_pdf/ijchp-53.pdf. Murphy, B. A., Costello, T. H., Watts, A. L., Cheong, Y. F., Berg, J. M., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2020). Strengths and weaknesses of two empathy measures: A comparison of the measurement precision, construct validity, and incremental validity of two multidimensional indices. Assessment, 27(2), 246-260. https://doi. org/10.1177/1073191118777636 Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus User’s Guide (8.a ed.). Muthén & Muthén. Myers, M., Laurent, S., & Hodges, S. (2014). Perspective taking instructions and self-other overlap: Different motives for helping. Motivation and Emotion, 38, 224-234. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-013-9377-y Oceja, L. V., Heerdink, M. W., Stocks, E. L., Ambrona, T., López-Pérez, B., & Salgado, S. (2014). Empathy, awareness of others, and action: How feeling empathy for oneamong-others motivates helping the others. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 36(2), 111-124. https://doi. org/10.1080/01973533.2013.856787 Oceja, L., & Jiménez, I. (2007). Beyond egoism and group identity: Empathy toward the other and awareness of others in a social dilemma. The Spanish Journal of Social Psychology, 10(2), 369-379. https://doi.org/10.1017/ s1138741600006636 Pérez-Albéniz, A., De Paúl, J., Etxeberría, J., Montes, M. P., & Torres, E. (2003). Adaptación de interpersonal reactivity index (iri) al español. Psicothema, 15(2), 267- 272. https://www.psicothema.com/pdf/1056.pdf Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02 Ruiz, S., & Madariaga, R. (2018). Historical and recent large megathrust earthquakes in Chile. Tectonophysics, 733, 37-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2018.01.015 Schreiber, J. B. (2017). Update to core reporting practices in structural equation modeling. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 13(3), 634-643. http://doi. org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.06.006 Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323-337. http:// doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338 Silke, C., Brady, B., Boylan, C., & Dolan, P. (2018). Factors influencing the development of empathy and prosocial behaviour among adolescents: A systematic review. Children and Youth Services Review, 94, 421-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.07.027 Stocks, E. L., Lishner, D. A., & Decker, S. K. (2009). Altruism or psychological escape: Why does empathy promote social behaviour? European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(5), 649-665. https://doi.org/10.1002/ ejsp.561 Stürmer, S., Snyder, M., Kropp, A., & Siem, B. (2006). Empathy motivated helping: The moderating role of group membership. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(7), 943-956. https://doi. org/10.1177/0146167206287363 Swann, Jr., W. B., Gómez, Á., Dovidio, J., Hart, S., & Jetten, J. (2010). Dying and killing for one’s group: Identity fusion moderates’ responses to intergroup versions of the trolley problem. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1176- 1183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610376656 Verhofstadt, L., Devoldre, I., Buysse, A., Stevens, M., Hinnekens, C., Ickes, W., & Davis, M. (2016). The role of cognitive and affective empathy in spouses’ support interactions: An observational study. PLos one, 11(2), Artículo e0149944. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0149944 Wolgast, A., Tandler, N., Harrison, L., & Umlauft, S. (2019). Adults’ dispositional and situational perspective-taking: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 353-389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09507-y Zhao, X., Li, X., Song, Y., & Shi, W. (2019). Autistic traits and prosocial behaviour in the general population: Test of the mediating effects of trait empathy and state empathic concern. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49(10), 3925-3938. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10803-018-3745-0 Zych, I., Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. (2019). Empathy and callous unemotional traits in different bullying roles: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 20(1), 3-21. https://doi. org/10.1177/1524838016683456Acta Colombiana de Psicología - 2023info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/4473preocupación empáticaangustia personalanálisis factorialEmpatíaEmpathic concernpersonal distressConfirmatory factor analysisempathyAnálisis factorial de la Escala Situacional de Empatía Emocional en una muestra universitaria chilenaFactor Analysis of the Situational Scale of Emotional Empathy in a University Chilean SampleArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2770https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/b7dd4529-e4bc-462e-8aa7-65bc86460ef9/download88771a199df3f3bad92c6b0f4a548085MD5110983/30503oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/305032023-12-19 14:56:25.784http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0Acta Colombiana de Psicología - 2023https://repository.ucatolica.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaCbdigital@metabiblioteca.com |