Contraste conductual en operantes relacionales con participantes humanos.

El contraste conductual es un fenómeno característico de los programas múltiples con operantes típicas de la clase presión de palanca o picoteo de la tecla, documentado ampliamente en animales. Recientemente, se han desarrollado procedimientos como los de discriminación condicional que podrían ser a...

Full description

Autores:: Pérez-Manrique, Tiberio
Díaz-Barbosa, Javier Hernán
Pulido-Vega, Juan Camilo

Tipo de recurso:: Article of investigation

Fecha de publicación:: 2009

Institución:: Universidad Católica de Colombia

Repositorio:: RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica

Idioma:: spa

id	UCATOLICA2_91a2a2a83bf44ece073ceb3060ca4eb5
oai_identifier_str	oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/28093
network_acronym_str	UCATOLICA2
network_name_str	RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	Contraste conductual en operantes relacionales con participantes humanos.
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv	Behavioral contrast in relational operants with human participants.
title	Contraste conductual en operantes relacionales con participantes humanos.
spellingShingle	Contraste conductual en operantes relacionales con participantes humanos. Behavioral contrast Relational operant Direct essay Choice Humans Contraste conductual Operante relacional Ensayo discreto Elección Contraste comportamental Operante relacional Experimentação discreta Escolha
title_short	Contraste conductual en operantes relacionales con participantes humanos.
title_full	Contraste conductual en operantes relacionales con participantes humanos.
title_fullStr	Contraste conductual en operantes relacionales con participantes humanos.
title_full_unstemmed	Contraste conductual en operantes relacionales con participantes humanos.
title_sort	Contraste conductual en operantes relacionales con participantes humanos.
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Pérez-Manrique, Tiberio Díaz-Barbosa, Javier Hernán Pulido-Vega, Juan Camilo
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv	Pérez-Manrique, Tiberio Díaz-Barbosa, Javier Hernán Pulido-Vega, Juan Camilo
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv	Behavioral contrast Relational operant Direct essay Choice Humans
topic	Behavioral contrast Relational operant Direct essay Choice Humans Contraste conductual Operante relacional Ensayo discreto Elección Contraste comportamental Operante relacional Experimentação discreta Escolha
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	Contraste conductual Operante relacional Ensayo discreto Elección Contraste comportamental Operante relacional Experimentação discreta Escolha
description	El contraste conductual es un fenómeno característico de los programas múltiples con operantes típicas de la clase presión de palanca o picoteo de la tecla, documentado ampliamente en animales. Recientemente, se han desarrollado procedimientos como los de discriminación condicional que podrían ser aplicables al estudio del contraste con operantes relacionales. Esta investigación tuvo como propósito determinar si el contraste conductual se presenta cuando se trabaja con este tipo de operantes; seis estudiantes de bachillerato, quienes participaron voluntariamente y no recibieron más paga que la dispuesta por las contingencias del programa, se expusieron a un programa múltiple de 100 ensayos por componente, al cabo de los cuales se realizó una prueba con relaciones derivadas y sin refuerzo asociado a cada elección. Analizando la razón de elección por componente del Experimento 1, se encontró contraste positivo en los tres participantes y en la prueba relacional se evidenció transferencia de las preferencias en los participantes 1 y 2; en el Experimento 2 se encontró inducción negativa en los tres participantes y en la prueba de trasferencia se evidenció inducción negativa en menor grado. Se concluye de este experimento, que el cambio en las contingencias se puede colocar bajo control contextual a la manera de un marco relacional.
publishDate	2009
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2009-07-01 00:00:00 2023-01-23T15:37:41Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2009-07-01 00:00:00 2023-01-23T15:37:41Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2009-07-01
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv	Journal article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv	1909-9711
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	0123-9155
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://hdl.handle.net/10983/28093
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv	https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/283
identifier_str_mv	1909-9711 0123-9155
url	https://hdl.handle.net/10983/28093 https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/283
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv	https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/283/290
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv	Núm. 2 , Año 2009
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv	126
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv	2
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv	115
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv	12
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv	Acta Colombiana de Psicología
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv	Amsel, A. (1962).Frustrative nonreward in partial reinforcement and discrimination learning: Some recent history and a theoretical extension. Psychological Review, 69: 306-328. Antonitis, J. (1951). Response variability in the white rat during conditioning, extinction, and reconditioning. Journal of Experimental. Psychology. 42: 273–281. Bloomfield, T. M. (1969). Behavioral contrast and the peak shift. En R. M. Gilbert y N. S. Sutherland (Eds.). Animal discrimination learning (pp. 215-241). New York: Academic Press. Bolles, R. C. (1991). The hedonics of taste .Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum. Catania, A. C. (1969). Concurrent performances: inhibition of one response by reinforcement of another. Journal of the Experimental analysis of Behavior. 12: 731-744. Dymond, S. & Barnes, D. (1995). A transformation of self-discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness, more than, and less than. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64:163–184. Edwards, R. P. (1979). Behavioral contrast in humans with response-independent reinforcement. Journal of General Psychology, 100: 159-160. Epstein, R. (1985). Extinction-induced resurgence: Preliminary investigations and possible applications. Psychological Record, 35: 143–153. Epstein, R. (1986). Simulation research in the analysis of behavior. En A. Poling y R. W. Epstein, R. & Skinner, B. F. (1980). Resurgence of responding after the cessation of response- independent reinforcement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 77: 6251–6253. Epstein, R. & Skinner, B. F. (1981). The spontaneous use of memoranda by pigeons. Behaviour Analysis Letters, 1: 241-246. Ferster, C. B. & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall. Inc. Fuqua (Eds.), Research methods in applied behavior analysis (pp. 127-155). New York: Plenum Press. Gamzu, E. & Williams, D. R. (1971). Classical conditioning of a complex skeletal act. Science, 171: 923-925. Hanson, H. M. (1959). Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 58: 321-333. Hantula, D. A. & Crowell, C. R. (1994). Behavioral contrast in a two option analogue task of financial decision making. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27: 607-617. Hayes, C. S. (1994). Relational Frame Theory: A functional approach to verbal events. En S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, M. Sato & K. One (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition (pp. 9-30). Reno, NV: Context Press. Herrnstein, R. J. (1970). On the law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 13: 243-266. Herrnstein, R. J. & Hineline, P. N. (1966). Negative reinforcement as shock – frequency reduction. Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 9: 421-430. Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of Behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Keehn, J. D. (1970). Reinforcement of alcoholism: schedule control of solitary drinking. Quarter y Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 31: 28-39. MacCorquodale, K. & Meehl, P. E. (1948). On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. Psychological Review, 55: 95-107. McIlvane, W. J., Kledaras, J. B., Munson, L. C., King, K. A., de Rose, J. C. & Stoddard, L. T. (1987). Controlling relations in conditional discrimination and matching by exclusion. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48: 187-208. Mowrer, O. H. (1940). An experimental analogue of ‘‘regression’’ with incidental observations on ‘‘reaction formation.’’ Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 35: 56-87. O’Kelly, L. I. (1940). An experimental study of regression. I. Behavioral characteristics of the regressive response. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 30: 41-53. Pettenger, D. J., Pavlik, W. B., Flora, S. R. & Kontos, J. M. (1988). The persistence of learned behaviors in humans as a function of changes in reinforcement schedule and response. Learning and Motivation, 19: 300-316. Premack, D. (1965). Reinforcement theory. En D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 123-180). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. Rawson, R. A., Leitenberg, H., Mulick, J. A & Lefebvre, M .F. (1977). Recovery of extinction responding in rats following discontinuation of reinforcement of alternative behavior: A test of two explanations. Animal Learning and Behavior, 5: 415–420. Reynolds, G. S. (1961). Behavioral contrast. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4: 57-71. Sajwah, T., Twardosz, S. & Burke, M. (1972). Side effects of extinction procedures in a remedial school. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5: 163–175. Sanders, M. J. (1937). An experimental demonstration of regression in the rat. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21: 493-510. Sidman, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of speech and Hearing Research, 14: 5-13. Sidman, M., Cresson, O. & Willson-Morris, M. (1974). Acquisition of matching-to-sample via mediated transfer. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22: 261-273. Simmons, R. (1924). The relative effectiveness of certain incentives in animal learning. Comparative Psychology Monographs. 11, n 7: 1-79. Skinner, B. F. (1938/1975). La conducta de los organismos: un análisis experimental. Barcelona: Fontanella. Skinner, B. F. (1957/1981). Conducta verbal. México: Trillas. Skinner, B. F. (1984). Selection by consequences. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7: 477-510. Spencer, H. (1870). Principles of Psychology. 2nd Ed. London: (En Boakes, 1984) Spradlin, J. E., Cotter, V. W. & Baxley, N. (1973). Establishing a conditional discrimination without direct training: A study of transfer with retarded adolescents. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77: 556–566. Staddon, J. R. & Simmelhag, V. L. (1971). The superstition experiment: a reexamination of its implications for the principles of adaptive behavior. Psychological Review, 78: 3-43. Steele, D. L. & Hayes, S. C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56: 519– 555. Stromer, R., Mcilvane, W. J. & Serna, R. W. (1993). Complex stimulus control and equivalence. The Psychological Record. 43: 585-598. Tarbox, J. & Hayes, L. P. (2005). Verbal behavior and behavioral contrast in human subjects. The Psychological Record, 55: 419-437. Terrace, H. S. (1974). On the nature of non-responding in discrimination learning with and without errors. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22: 151-159. Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Animal intelligence: Experimental studies. New York: Macmillan. Tinklepaugh, O. L. (1928). An experimental study of representative factors in monkeys. Journal of the comparative Psychology, 8: 197-236. Tolman, E. C. (1932). Purposive behavior in animals and men. New York: Century. Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological review, 20: 158-177. Williams, B, A. (2002). Behavioral contrast redux. Animal Learning & Behavior, 30: 1-20.
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv	Tiberio Pérez Manrique, Javier Hernan Diaz Barbosa, Juan Camilo Pulido Vega - 2009
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv	Tiberio Pérez Manrique, Javier Hernan Diaz Barbosa, Juan Camilo Pulido Vega - 2009 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad Católica de Colombia
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv	https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/283
institution	Universidad Católica de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/0ae1a8d4-4f73-4ce4-ab75-b88424dc0474/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	2f0d25e9cc229fa423ee2fc5ee55b6bd
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_	1808402709080965120
spelling	Pérez-Manrique, Tiberio838fa692-afe4-4547-89aa-290cef38a0faDíaz-Barbosa, Javier Hernánb8d3f7ca-3cd0-4881-ac8e-91602580835aPulido-Vega, Juan Camilodfec5a8f-c8d4-444f-868a-0587f450a0eb2009-07-01 00:00:002023-01-23T15:37:41Z2009-07-01 00:00:002023-01-23T15:37:41Z2009-07-01El contraste conductual es un fenómeno característico de los programas múltiples con operantes típicas de la clase presión de palanca o picoteo de la tecla, documentado ampliamente en animales. Recientemente, se han desarrollado procedimientos como los de discriminación condicional que podrían ser aplicables al estudio del contraste con operantes relacionales. Esta investigación tuvo como propósito determinar si el contraste conductual se presenta cuando se trabaja con este tipo de operantes; seis estudiantes de bachillerato, quienes participaron voluntariamente y no recibieron más paga que la dispuesta por las contingencias del programa, se expusieron a un programa múltiple de 100 ensayos por componente, al cabo de los cuales se realizó una prueba con relaciones derivadas y sin refuerzo asociado a cada elección. Analizando la razón de elección por componente del Experimento 1, se encontró contraste positivo en los tres participantes y en la prueba relacional se evidenció transferencia de las preferencias en los participantes 1 y 2; en el Experimento 2 se encontró inducción negativa en los tres participantes y en la prueba de trasferencia se evidenció inducción negativa en menor grado. Se concluye de este experimento, que el cambio en las contingencias se puede colocar bajo control contextual a la manera de un marco relacional.Behavioral contrast is a phenomenon which characterizes multiple programs with common operants such as lever pressures or key pecks. It must be pointed out that behavioral contrast is widely documented in animals. Recently, different procedures have been developed which might be applied to the study of behavioral contrast with relational operants (i.e., conditional discrimination). The purpose of this research was to determine whether behavioral contrast takes place when working with this type of operants. Six high school students, who volunteered to participate and did not receive any other payment than the one arranged by the contingencies of the reinforcement schedule were exposed to a multiple program of 100 trials per component. After this procedure, a test consisting of derivative relations without reinforcement associated to each choice was carried out. When analyzing the reason for choice by component in Experiment 1, a positive contrast in the three participants was found and in the relational test, transference of preference was evidenced in participants 1 and 2. In Experiment 2, negative induction was found in the three participants and in the transference test, a lower degree of negative induction was evidenced. The conclusion drawn from this experiment is that change in the contingencies can be placed under contextual control in the manner of a relational framework.application/pdf1909-97110123-9155https://hdl.handle.net/10983/28093https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/283spaUniversidad Católica de Colombiahttps://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/283/290Núm. 2 , Año 2009126211512Acta Colombiana de PsicologíaAmsel, A. (1962).Frustrative nonreward in partial reinforcement and discrimination learning: Some recent history and a theoretical extension. Psychological Review, 69: 306-328.Antonitis, J. (1951). Response variability in the white rat during conditioning, extinction, and reconditioning. Journal of Experimental. Psychology. 42: 273–281.Bloomfield, T. M. (1969). Behavioral contrast and the peak shift. En R. M. Gilbert y N. S. Sutherland (Eds.). Animal discrimination learning (pp. 215-241). New York: Academic Press.Bolles, R. C. (1991). The hedonics of taste .Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.Catania, A. C. (1969). Concurrent performances: inhibition of one response by reinforcement of another. Journal of the Experimental analysis of Behavior. 12: 731-744.Dymond, S. & Barnes, D. (1995). A transformation of self-discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness, more than, and less than. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64:163–184.Edwards, R. P. (1979). Behavioral contrast in humans with response-independent reinforcement. Journal of General Psychology, 100: 159-160.Epstein, R. (1985). Extinction-induced resurgence: Preliminary investigations and possible applications. Psychological Record, 35: 143–153.Epstein, R. (1986). Simulation research in the analysis of behavior. En A. Poling y R. W.Epstein, R. & Skinner, B. F. (1980). Resurgence of responding after the cessation of response- independent reinforcement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 77: 6251–6253.Epstein, R. & Skinner, B. F. (1981). The spontaneous use of memoranda by pigeons. Behaviour Analysis Letters, 1: 241-246.Ferster, C. B. & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall. Inc. Fuqua (Eds.), Research methods in applied behavior analysis (pp. 127-155). New York: Plenum Press.Gamzu, E. & Williams, D. R. (1971). Classical conditioning of a complex skeletal act. Science, 171: 923-925.Hanson, H. M. (1959). Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 58: 321-333.Hantula, D. A. & Crowell, C. R. (1994). Behavioral contrast in a two option analogue task of financial decision making. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27: 607-617.Hayes, C. S. (1994). Relational Frame Theory: A functional approach to verbal events. En S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, M. Sato & K. One (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition (pp. 9-30). Reno, NV: Context Press.Herrnstein, R. J. (1970). On the law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 13: 243-266.Herrnstein, R. J. & Hineline, P. N. (1966). Negative reinforcement as shock – frequency reduction. Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 9: 421-430.Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of Behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Keehn, J. D. (1970). Reinforcement of alcoholism: schedule control of solitary drinking. Quarter y Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 31: 28-39.MacCorquodale, K. & Meehl, P. E. (1948). On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. Psychological Review, 55: 95-107.McIlvane, W. J., Kledaras, J. B., Munson, L. C., King, K. A., de Rose, J. C. & Stoddard, L. T. (1987). Controlling relations in conditional discrimination and matching by exclusion. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48: 187-208.Mowrer, O. H. (1940). An experimental analogue of ‘‘regression’’ with incidental observations on ‘‘reaction formation.’’ Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 35: 56-87.O’Kelly, L. I. (1940). An experimental study of regression. I. Behavioral characteristics of the regressive response. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 30: 41-53.Pettenger, D. J., Pavlik, W. B., Flora, S. R. & Kontos, J. M. (1988). The persistence of learned behaviors in humans as a function of changes in reinforcement schedule and response. Learning and Motivation, 19: 300-316.Premack, D. (1965). Reinforcement theory. En D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 123-180). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Rawson, R. A., Leitenberg, H., Mulick, J. A & Lefebvre, M .F. (1977). Recovery of extinction responding in rats following discontinuation of reinforcement of alternative behavior: A test of two explanations. Animal Learning and Behavior, 5: 415–420.Reynolds, G. S. (1961). Behavioral contrast. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4: 57-71.Sajwah, T., Twardosz, S. & Burke, M. (1972). Side effects of extinction procedures in a remedial school. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5: 163–175.Sanders, M. J. (1937). An experimental demonstration of regression in the rat. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21: 493-510.Sidman, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of speech and Hearing Research, 14: 5-13.Sidman, M., Cresson, O. & Willson-Morris, M. (1974). Acquisition of matching-to-sample via mediated transfer. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22: 261-273.Simmons, R. (1924). The relative effectiveness of certain incentives in animal learning. Comparative Psychology Monographs. 11, n 7: 1-79.Skinner, B. F. (1938/1975). La conducta de los organismos: un análisis experimental. Barcelona: Fontanella.Skinner, B. F. (1957/1981). Conducta verbal. México: Trillas.Skinner, B. F. (1984). Selection by consequences. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7: 477-510.Spencer, H. (1870). Principles of Psychology. 2nd Ed. London: (En Boakes, 1984)Spradlin, J. E., Cotter, V. W. & Baxley, N. (1973). Establishing a conditional discrimination without direct training: A study of transfer with retarded adolescents. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77: 556–566.Staddon, J. R. & Simmelhag, V. L. (1971). The superstition experiment: a reexamination of its implications for the principles of adaptive behavior. Psychological Review, 78: 3-43.Steele, D. L. & Hayes, S. C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56: 519– 555.Stromer, R., Mcilvane, W. J. & Serna, R. W. (1993). Complex stimulus control and equivalence. The Psychological Record. 43: 585-598.Tarbox, J. & Hayes, L. P. (2005). Verbal behavior and behavioral contrast in human subjects. The Psychological Record, 55: 419-437.Terrace, H. S. (1974). On the nature of non-responding in discrimination learning with and without errors. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22: 151-159.Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Animal intelligence: Experimental studies. New York: Macmillan.Tinklepaugh, O. L. (1928). An experimental study of representative factors in monkeys. Journal of the comparative Psychology, 8: 197-236.Tolman, E. C. (1932). Purposive behavior in animals and men. New York: Century.Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological review, 20: 158-177.Williams, B, A. (2002). Behavioral contrast redux. Animal Learning & Behavior, 30: 1-20.Tiberio Pérez Manrique, Javier Hernan Diaz Barbosa, Juan Camilo Pulido Vega - 2009info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/283Behavioral contrastRelational operantDirect essayChoiceHumansContraste conductualOperante relacionalEnsayo discretoElecciónContraste comportamentalOperante relacionalExperimentação discretaEscolhaContraste conductual en operantes relacionales con participantes humanos.Behavioral contrast in relational operants with human participants.Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2664https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/0ae1a8d4-4f73-4ce4-ab75-b88424dc0474/download2f0d25e9cc229fa423ee2fc5ee55b6bdMD5110983/28093oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/280932023-03-24 18:07:34.689https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Tiberio Pérez Manrique, Javier Hernan Diaz Barbosa, Juan Camilo Pulido Vega - 2009https://repository.ucatolica.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaCbdigital@metabiblioteca.com

Contraste conductual en operantes relacionales con participantes humanos.

Publicaciones similares