La prueba judicial: una aproximación realista
The issue of the veracity of legal claims and its consequences is based, first and foremost, on the study of legal philosophy. This article explores the substantivity of judicial evidence from the perspective of classical legal realism, as a key mechanism against claims of truth and the different mo...
- Autores:
-
Romero-Infante, Jeisson
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2017
- Institución:
- Universidad Católica de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/16358
- Acceso en línea:
- http://hdl.handle.net/10983/16358
- Palabra clave:
- JUSTICIA
JURISTA
PRUEBA JUDICIAL
REALISMO JURÍDICO
PRETENSIÓN DE VERDAD
JUSTICE
LAWYER
LEGAL EVIDENCE
LEGAL REALISM
CLAIM OF TRUTH
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2017
| Summary: | The issue of the veracity of legal claims and its consequences is based, first and foremost, on the study of legal philosophy. This article explores the substantivity of judicial evidence from the perspective of classical legal realism, as a key mechanism against claims of truth and the different models of truth from different positions. Judicial decisions go through ontological and definitive interpretations of what is fair and right, in relation to judicial evidence, through the exercise of legal science by the jurist. |
|---|