The populist disruption : juridico-political reflections on democracy, law and rights.

En la coyuntura actual, el populismo describe la interrupción de la definición y la conexión entre democracia, ley y derechos. Representa el desafío tanto para las formas existentes de representación política del pueblo como para el marco jurídico-político más amplio o las instituciones de la democr...

Full description

Autores:: Langford, Peter

Tipo de recurso:: Article of journal

Fecha de publicación:: 2018

Institución:: Universidad Católica de Colombia

Repositorio:: RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica

Idioma:: eng

id	UCATOLICA2_75754a93d45306f5e0838b1c93b38bd0
oai_identifier_str	oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/29997
network_acronym_str	UCATOLICA2
network_name_str	RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	The populist disruption : juridico-political reflections on democracy, law and rights.
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv	The populist disruption : juridico-political reflections on democracy, law and rights.
title	The populist disruption : juridico-political reflections on democracy, law and rights.
spellingShingle	The populist disruption : juridico-political reflections on democracy, law and rights. Derecho Moralidad Populismo Violencia Law Morality Populism Violence
title_short	The populist disruption : juridico-political reflections on democracy, law and rights.
title_full	The populist disruption : juridico-political reflections on democracy, law and rights.
title_fullStr	The populist disruption : juridico-political reflections on democracy, law and rights.
title_full_unstemmed	The populist disruption : juridico-political reflections on democracy, law and rights.
title_sort	The populist disruption : juridico-political reflections on democracy, law and rights.
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Langford, Peter
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv	Langford, Peter
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	Derecho Moralidad Populismo Violencia
topic	Derecho Moralidad Populismo Violencia Law Morality Populism Violence
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv	Law Morality Populism Violence
description	En la coyuntura actual, el populismo describe la interrupción de la definición y la conexión entre democracia, ley y derechos. Representa el desafío tanto para las formas existentes de representación política del pueblo como para el marco jurídico-político más amplio o las instituciones de la democracia. En contraste con los análisis predominantemente políticos de este fenómeno populista, que han hecho que la relación del populismo con el derecho positivo sea periférica, la atención se centrará en un análisis jurídico-político del populismo. El análisis se concentrará en los aspectos centrales de la relación entre populismo y ley positiva (Ley y Moralidad; Ley y Derechos y Ley y Violencia).
publishDate	2018
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2018-07-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2018-07-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2018-07-01
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.eng.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.driver.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv	Journal article
dc.type.redcol.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
dc.type.version.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv	2539-2239
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	2389-8232
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv	https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/3645
identifier_str_mv	2539-2239 2389-8232
url	https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/3645
dc.language.iso.eng.fl_str_mv	eng
language	eng
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv	https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/download/3645/3391
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv	Núm. 10 , Año 2018 :Julio - Diciembre
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv	96
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv	10
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv	78
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv	5
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv	Soft Power
dc.relation.references.eng.fl_str_mv	Afonso, A. & Rennwald, L. (2018). Social Class and the Changing Welfare State Agenda of Radical Right Parties in Europe. In P. Manow, B. Palier, & H. Schwander (Eds.), Welfare Democracies and Party Politics: Explaining Electoral Dynamics in Times of Changing Welfare Capitalism (pp.171-197). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ajanovic, E., Mayer, S., & Sauer, B. (2018). Constructing ‘the people’: An intersectional analysis of right-wing concepts of democracy and citizenship in Austria. Journal of Language and Politics, https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.18013.may (not yet assigned a journal issue). Barr, R. R. (2017). The Resurgence of Populism in Latin America. Boulder: Lynne Reiner. Benazzo, S. (2017). Not All the Past Needs To Be Used: Features of Fidesz’s Politics of Memory. Journal of Nationalism, Memory & Language Politics, 11(2), 198-221. Bizeul, Y. & Rohgalf, J. (eds.). (2018). Offene oder geschlossene Kollektividentität: Von der Entstehung einer neuen politischen Konfliktlinie. Wiesbaden: Springer. Brömmel, W., König, H. & Sicking, M. (Eds.). (2017). Populismus und Extremismus in Europa: Gesellschaftswissenschaftliche und sozialpsychologische Perspektiven. Bielefeld: Transcript. Brunkhorst, H. (2005). Solidarity: From Civic Friendship to a Global Legal Community. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Capra, F. & Mattei, U. (2015). The Ecology of Law: Toward a Legal System in Tune with Nature and Community. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc. Clarke, D. & Duber, P. (2018). Polish Cultural Diplomacy and Historical Memory: the Case of the Museum of the Second World War in Gdańsk. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 1-18 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-018-9294-x 1-18 (not yet assigned a journal issue). Caramani, D. (2017). Will vs. Reason: The Populist and Technocratic Forms of Political Representation and Their Critique to Party Government. American Political Science Review, 111(1), 54-67. Chignola, S. (ed.). (2012). Il diritto del comune. Crisi della sovranità, proprietà e nuovi poteri costituenti. Verona: Ombrecorte. De Giorgi, E. & Russo, F. (2018). Portugal: the unexpected path of far left parties, from permanent opposition to government support. In E. De Giorgi & G. Ilonszki (Eds.), Opposition Parties in European Legislatures Conflict or Consensus? (pp.95-112). London: Routledge. De la Torre, C. & Arnson, C.J. (eds.). (2013). Latin American Populism in the Twenty-First Century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Dubet, F. (2014). Préférence pour l’inégalité: Comprendre la crise des solidarités. Paris: Editions du Seuil. Goździak, E. M. & Márton, P. (2018). Where the Wild Things Are: Fear of Islam and the Anti-Refugee Rhetoric in Hungary and in Poland. Central and Eastern European Migration Review, 1-27 https://doi: 10.17467/ceemr.2018.04 (not yet assigned a journal issue). Halami, G. (2018). The Application of European Constitutional Values in EU Member States: The Case of the Fundamental Law of Hungary. European Journal of Law Reform, 20(2-3) https://doi:10.5553/EJLR/138723702018020002002 (not yet assigned a journal issue). Hamburger J. (2018). Whose Populism? The Mixed Messages of La France Insoumise. Dissent, 65(3), 101-110. Heinisch, R. & O. Mazzoleni (Eds.) (2016). Understanding Populist Party Himma, K. E. (2004). Inclusive Legal Positivism. In J. L. Coleman, K. E. Himma, & S. J. Shapiro (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law (pp.125-165). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kelemen, K. (2017). The New Hungarian Constitution: Legal Critiques from Europe. Review of Central and East European Law, 42(1), 1-49. Kioupkiolis, A. & Seoane Pérez, F. (2017). Reflexive technopopulism: Podemos and the search for a new left-wing hegemony. European Political Science, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-017-0140-9 (not yet assigned to a journal issue). Koncewicz, T.T. (2017). On the Politics of Resentment, Mis-Memory, and the Constitutional Fidelity: The Demise of the Polish Overlapping Consensus? In U. Uladzislau Belavusau & A. Gliszczyńska-Grabias, (Eds.), Law and Memory: Towards Legal Governance of History (pp.263-290). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Koncewicz, T.T. (2018). The Capture of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal and Beyond: Of Institution(s), Fidelities and the Rule of Law in Flux. Review of Central and East European Law, 43(2), 116-173. Kramer, M. (1999). In Defense of Legal Positivism: Law Without Trimmings. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kramer, M., Simmonds, N.E., & Steiner, H. (2000). A Debate Over Rights: Philosophical Enquiries. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kramer, M., & Steiner, H. (2007). Theories of Rights: Is There a Third Way? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 27(2), 281-310. Kramer, M. (2013). Some Doubts about Alternatives to the Interest Theory. Ethics, 123(2), 245-63. Krastev, I. (2014). Democracy Disrupted. The Politics of Global Protest. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University Press. Kridle, C. (2018). Polityka Historiczna: Debating Holocaust Remembrance in Poland. Voces Novae, 10(1) (Available at: https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/vocesnovae/vol10/iss1/7) Leezenberg, M. (2015). Discursive violence and responsibility. Notes on the pragmatics of Dutch populism. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 3(1), 200-228. Lucarelli, A. (2013). La democrazia dei beni comuni. Rome/Bari: Laterza. Marchlewska, M., Cichocka, A., Panayiotou, O., Castellanos, K. & Batayne, J. (2018). Populism as Identity Politics: Perceived In-Group Disadvantage, Collective Narcissism, and Support for Populism. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(2), 151-162. Marella, M.R. (ed.). (2012). Oltre il pubblico e il private. Per un diritto dei beni comuni. Verona: Ombrecorte. Marmor, A. (2004). Exclusive Legal Positivism. In Coleman, J.L., Himma, K.E., & Shapiro, S.J. (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law (pp.104-124). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Marmor, A. (2006). Legal Positivism: Still Descriptive and Morally Neutral. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26(4), 683–704. Mattei, U. (2018). Having, Being, and the Commons. In V. Giorgino & Z. Walsh (Eds.), Co-Designing Economies in Transition (pp.63-71). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Menke, C. (2018). Law and Violence. In Menke, C. Law and Violence: Christoph Menke in Dialogue (pp.3-76). Manchester: Manchester University Press. Minkenberg, M. (2018). Between party and movement: conceptual and empirical considerations of the radical right’s organizational boundaries and mobilization processes. European Societies, https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2018.1494296 (not yet assigned a journal issue). Mishtal, J. (2015). The Politics of Morality: The Church, the State, and Reproductive Rights in Postsocialist Poland. Athens: Ohio University Press. Mishtal, J. (2015). Reproductive Governance and the (Re)definition of Human Rights in Poland. Medical Anthropology, 1-13 https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2018.1472 090 (not yet assigned to a journal issue) Mouffe, C. (2018). For a Left Populism. London: Verso. Mounk, Y. (2018). The People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Mudde, C. (2014). Fighting the System? Populist Radical Right Parties and Party System Change. Party Politics, 20(2), 217–226. Müller, J.W. (2017). What is Populism? London: Penguin. Munck, R. (2018). Rethinking the left: a view from Latin America. Global Discourse, 8(2), 260-275. Negri, A. (2010). The Law of the Common. Finish Yearbook of International Law, 21, 16-25. Olsen, J. (2018). The Left Party and the AfD: Populist Competitors in Eastern Germany German Politics and Society, 36(1), 70-83. Otjes, S., Ivaldi, G., Jupskås, A. R., Mazzoleni, O. (2018). It’s not Economic Interventionism, Stupid! Reassessing the Political Economy of Radical Right‐wing Populist Parties. Swiss Political Science Review, 24(3), 270-290. Paugam, S. (ed.). (2015) Repenser la solidarité: L’apport des sciences sociales 2nd Edition. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Peruzzotti, E. (2017). Regime betterment or regime change? A critical review of recent debates on liberal democracy and populism in Latin America. Constellations, 24, 389–400. Raz, J. (1994). Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Reynié, D. (2013). Les nouveaux populismes. Paris: Fayard. Solar, J. and Rendueles, C. (2018). Podemos, the upheaval of Spanish politics and the challenge of populism. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 26(1), 99-116. Rodotà, S. (2013). Il terribile diritto. Studi sulla proprietà privata e i beni comuni. Bologna: Il Mulino. Rodotà, S. (2014). Solidarietà. Un’utopia necessaria. Rome/Bari: Laterza. Sadurski, W. (2018). Polish Constitutional Tribunal Under PiS: From an Activist Court, to a Paralysed Tribunal, to a Governmental Enabler. Hague Journal of the Rule of Law, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-018-0078-1 (not yet assigned a journal issue nor pagination). Seewann, G. (2018). Hungary: History as a Legitimizing Precedent – “Illiberal Democracy”. Zeitschrift für Ostmitteleuropa-Forschung / Journal of East Central European Studies, 67(2), 239-249. Steiner, H. (2013). Directed Duties and Inalienable Rights. Ethics, 123(2), 230-44. Supiot, A. (ed.). (2015). La Solidarité: Enquête sur un principe juridique. Paris: Odile Jacob. Szikra, D. (2014). Democracy and welfare in hard times: The social policy of the Orbán Government in Hungary between 2010 and 2014. Journal of European Social Policy, 24(5), 486-500. Szikra, D. (2018). Welfare for the Wealthy. The Social Policy of the Orbán Regime. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung Budapest Analysis. Budapest (https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/Budapest/14209.pdf ; 20/9/2018). Sznajder, M. Roniger, L. & Forment C. (eds.). (2012). Shifting Frontiers of Citizenship: The Latin American Experience. Leiden: Brill. Taguieff, P.-A. (2007). L’illusion populiste: Essai sur les démagogies de l’âge démocratique. Paris: Flammarion. Taguieff, P.-A. (2015). La revanche du nationalisme. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Teubner, G. (2010). Societal Constitutionalism and the Politics of the Common. Finish Yearbook of International Law, 21, 2-15. Teubner, G. (2016). Exogenous Self-Binding: How Social Subsystems Externalise Their Foundational Paradoxes in the Process of Constitutionalisation. In A. Febbrajo, & G. Corsi (Eds.), Sociology of Constitutions: A Paradoxical Perspective (pp.30-48), London: Routledge. Van Duffel, S. (2012). In Defense of the Will Theory of Rights. Res Publica, 18(4), 231–31. Waluchow, W.J. (1994). Inclusive Legal Positivism, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Wyrzykowski, M. (2018). Rule of Law: European Commission v. Poland. In A. Hatje, & L. Tichý (Eds.), Liability of Member States for the Violation of Fundamental Values of the European Union/Europarecht 1 (pp.169-200), Baden-Baden: Nomos.
dc.rights.eng.fl_str_mv	Peter Langford - 2018
dc.rights.accessrights.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.eng.fl_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv	Peter Langford - 2018 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.eng.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Soft Power
dc.source.eng.fl_str_mv	https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/3645
institution	Universidad Católica de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/f15e21b8-7cc4-4af8-afe8-d21fa8e2e432/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	cd0f8a41907f88881edbf785f2b82b89
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_	1814256423028129792
spelling	Langford, Peter1b21fa41-9417-42c5-aa33-d59b95085d1f2018-07-01T00:00:00Z2018-07-01T00:00:00Z2018-07-01En la coyuntura actual, el populismo describe la interrupción de la definición y la conexión entre democracia, ley y derechos. Representa el desafío tanto para las formas existentes de representación política del pueblo como para el marco jurídico-político más amplio o las instituciones de la democracia. En contraste con los análisis predominantemente políticos de este fenómeno populista, que han hecho que la relación del populismo con el derecho positivo sea periférica, la atención se centrará en un análisis jurídico-político del populismo. El análisis se concentrará en los aspectos centrales de la relación entre populismo y ley positiva (Ley y Moralidad; Ley y Derechos y Ley y Violencia).In the current conjuncture, populism describes the disruption of the definition of, and connection between, democracy, law and rights. It represents the challenge to both the existing forms of political representation of the people and to the wider juridico-political framework or institutions of democracy. In contrast to predominantly political analyses of this populist phenomenon, which have rendered the relationship of populism to positive law peripheral, the focus will upon a juridico-political analysis of populism. The analysis will concentrate upon the central aspects of the relationship between populism and positive law (Law and Morality; Law and Rights and Law and Violence).application/pdf2539-22392389-8232https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/3645engSoft Powerhttps://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/download/3645/3391Núm. 10 , Año 2018 :Julio - Diciembre9610785Soft PowerAfonso, A. & Rennwald, L. (2018). Social Class and the Changing Welfare State Agenda of Radical Right Parties in Europe. In P. Manow, B. Palier, & H. Schwander (Eds.), Welfare Democracies and Party Politics: Explaining Electoral Dynamics in Times of Changing Welfare Capitalism (pp.171-197). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Ajanovic, E., Mayer, S., & Sauer, B. (2018). Constructing ‘the people’: An intersectional analysis of right-wing concepts of democracy and citizenship in Austria. Journal of Language and Politics, https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.18013.may (not yet assigned a journal issue).Barr, R. R. (2017). The Resurgence of Populism in Latin America. Boulder: Lynne Reiner. Benazzo, S. (2017). Not All the Past Needs To Be Used: Features of Fidesz’s Politics of Memory. Journal of Nationalism, Memory & Language Politics, 11(2), 198-221. Bizeul, Y. & Rohgalf, J. (eds.). (2018). Offene oder geschlossene Kollektividentität: Von der Entstehung einer neuen politischen Konfliktlinie. Wiesbaden: Springer. Brömmel, W., König, H. & Sicking, M. (Eds.). (2017). Populismus und Extremismus in Europa: Gesellschaftswissenschaftliche und sozialpsychologische Perspektiven. Bielefeld: Transcript.Brunkhorst, H. (2005). Solidarity: From Civic Friendship to a Global Legal Community. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Capra, F. & Mattei, U. (2015). The Ecology of Law: Toward a Legal System in Tune with Nature and Community. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.Clarke, D. & Duber, P. (2018). Polish Cultural Diplomacy and Historical Memory: the Case of the Museum of the Second World War in Gdańsk. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 1-18 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-018-9294-x 1-18 (not yet assigned a journal issue).Caramani, D. (2017). Will vs. Reason: The Populist and Technocratic Forms of Political Representation and Their Critique to Party Government. American Political Science Review, 111(1), 54-67.Chignola, S. (ed.). (2012). Il diritto del comune. Crisi della sovranità, proprietà e nuovi poteri costituenti. Verona: Ombrecorte.De Giorgi, E. & Russo, F. (2018). Portugal: the unexpected path of far left parties, from permanent opposition to government support. In E. De Giorgi & G. Ilonszki (Eds.), Opposition Parties in European Legislatures Conflict or Consensus? (pp.95-112). London: Routledge.De la Torre, C. & Arnson, C.J. (eds.). (2013). Latin American Populism in the Twenty-First Century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Dubet, F. (2014). Préférence pour l’inégalité: Comprendre la crise des solidarités. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Goździak, E. M. & Márton, P. (2018). Where the Wild Things Are: Fear of Islam and the Anti-Refugee Rhetoric in Hungary and in Poland. Central and Eastern European Migration Review, 1-27 https://doi: 10.17467/ceemr.2018.04 (not yet assigned a journal issue).Halami, G. (2018). The Application of European Constitutional Values in EU Member States: The Case of the Fundamental Law of Hungary. European Journal of Law Reform, 20(2-3) https://doi:10.5553/EJLR/138723702018020002002 (not yet assigned a journal issue).Hamburger J. (2018). Whose Populism? The Mixed Messages of La France Insoumise. Dissent, 65(3), 101-110.Heinisch, R. & O. Mazzoleni (Eds.) (2016). Understanding Populist PartyHimma, K. E. (2004). Inclusive Legal Positivism. In J. L. Coleman, K. E. Himma, & S. J. Shapiro (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law (pp.125-165). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Kelemen, K. (2017). The New Hungarian Constitution: Legal Critiques from Europe. Review of Central and East European Law, 42(1), 1-49.Kioupkiolis, A. & Seoane Pérez, F. (2017). Reflexive technopopulism: Podemos and the search for a new left-wing hegemony. European Political Science, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-017-0140-9 (not yet assigned to a journal issue).Koncewicz, T.T. (2017). On the Politics of Resentment, Mis-Memory, and the Constitutional Fidelity: The Demise of the Polish Overlapping Consensus? In U. Uladzislau Belavusau & A. Gliszczyńska-Grabias, (Eds.), Law and Memory: Towards Legal Governance of History (pp.263-290). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Koncewicz, T.T. (2018). The Capture of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal and Beyond: Of Institution(s), Fidelities and the Rule of Law in Flux. Review of Central and East European Law, 43(2), 116-173.Kramer, M. (1999). In Defense of Legal Positivism: Law Without Trimmings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Kramer, M., Simmonds, N.E., & Steiner, H. (2000). A Debate Over Rights: Philosophical Enquiries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Kramer, M., & Steiner, H. (2007). Theories of Rights: Is There a Third Way? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 27(2), 281-310.Kramer, M. (2013). Some Doubts about Alternatives to the Interest Theory. Ethics, 123(2), 245-63.Krastev, I. (2014). Democracy Disrupted. The Politics of Global Protest. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University Press.Kridle, C. (2018). Polityka Historiczna: Debating Holocaust Remembrance in Poland. Voces Novae, 10(1) (Available at: https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/vocesnovae/vol10/iss1/7)Leezenberg, M. (2015). Discursive violence and responsibility. Notes on the pragmatics of Dutch populism. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 3(1), 200-228.Lucarelli, A. (2013). La democrazia dei beni comuni. Rome/Bari: Laterza. Marchlewska, M., Cichocka, A., Panayiotou, O., Castellanos, K. & Batayne, J. (2018). Populism as Identity Politics: Perceived In-Group Disadvantage, Collective Narcissism, and Support for Populism. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(2), 151-162.Marella, M.R. (ed.). (2012). Oltre il pubblico e il private. Per un diritto dei beni comuni. Verona: Ombrecorte.Marmor, A. (2004). Exclusive Legal Positivism. In Coleman, J.L., Himma, K.E., & Shapiro, S.J. (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law (pp.104-124). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Marmor, A. (2006). Legal Positivism: Still Descriptive and Morally Neutral. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26(4), 683–704.Mattei, U. (2018). Having, Being, and the Commons. In V. Giorgino & Z. Walsh (Eds.), Co-Designing Economies in Transition (pp.63-71). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Menke, C. (2018). Law and Violence. In Menke, C. Law and Violence: Christoph Menke in Dialogue (pp.3-76). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Minkenberg, M. (2018). Between party and movement: conceptual and empirical considerations of the radical right’s organizational boundaries and mobilization processes. European Societies, https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2018.1494296 (not yet assigned a journal issue).Mishtal, J. (2015). The Politics of Morality: The Church, the State, and Reproductive Rights in Postsocialist Poland. Athens: Ohio University Press.Mishtal, J. (2015). Reproductive Governance and the (Re)definition of Human Rights in Poland. Medical Anthropology, 1-13 https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2018.1472 090 (not yet assigned to a journal issue)Mouffe, C. (2018). For a Left Populism. London: Verso.Mounk, Y. (2018). The People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Mudde, C. (2014). Fighting the System? Populist Radical Right Parties and Party System Change. Party Politics, 20(2), 217–226.Müller, J.W. (2017). What is Populism? London: Penguin.Munck, R. (2018). Rethinking the left: a view from Latin America. Global Discourse, 8(2), 260-275.Negri, A. (2010). The Law of the Common. Finish Yearbook of International Law, 21, 16-25.Olsen, J. (2018). The Left Party and the AfD: Populist Competitors in Eastern Germany German Politics and Society, 36(1), 70-83.Otjes, S., Ivaldi, G., Jupskås, A. R., Mazzoleni, O. (2018). It’s not Economic Interventionism, Stupid! Reassessing the Political Economy of Radical Right‐wing Populist Parties. Swiss Political Science Review, 24(3), 270-290.Paugam, S. (ed.). (2015) Repenser la solidarité: L’apport des sciences sociales 2nd Edition. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Peruzzotti, E. (2017). Regime betterment or regime change? A critical review of recent debates on liberal democracy and populism in Latin America. Constellations, 24, 389–400.Raz, J. (1994). Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Reynié, D. (2013). Les nouveaux populismes. Paris: Fayard.Solar, J. and Rendueles, C. (2018). Podemos, the upheaval of Spanish politics and the challenge of populism. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 26(1), 99-116.Rodotà, S. (2013). Il terribile diritto. Studi sulla proprietà privata e i beni comuni. Bologna: Il Mulino.Rodotà, S. (2014). Solidarietà. Un’utopia necessaria. Rome/Bari: Laterza.Sadurski, W. (2018). Polish Constitutional Tribunal Under PiS: From an Activist Court, to a Paralysed Tribunal, to a Governmental Enabler. Hague Journal of the Rule of Law, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-018-0078-1 (not yet assigned a journal issue nor pagination).Seewann, G. (2018). Hungary: History as a Legitimizing Precedent – “Illiberal Democracy”. Zeitschrift für Ostmitteleuropa-Forschung / Journal of East Central European Studies, 67(2), 239-249.Steiner, H. (2013). Directed Duties and Inalienable Rights. Ethics, 123(2), 230-44.Supiot, A. (ed.). (2015). La Solidarité: Enquête sur un principe juridique. Paris: Odile Jacob.Szikra, D. (2014). Democracy and welfare in hard times: The social policy of the Orbán Government in Hungary between 2010 and 2014. Journal of European Social Policy, 24(5), 486-500.Szikra, D. (2018). Welfare for the Wealthy. The Social Policy of the Orbán Regime. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung Budapest Analysis. Budapest (https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/Budapest/14209.pdf ; 20/9/2018).Sznajder, M. Roniger, L. & Forment C. (eds.). (2012). Shifting Frontiers of Citizenship: The Latin American Experience. Leiden: Brill.Taguieff, P.-A. (2007). L’illusion populiste: Essai sur les démagogies de l’âge démocratique. Paris: Flammarion.Taguieff, P.-A. (2015). La revanche du nationalisme. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Teubner, G. (2010). Societal Constitutionalism and the Politics of the Common. Finish Yearbook of International Law, 21, 2-15.Teubner, G. (2016). Exogenous Self-Binding: How Social Subsystems Externalise Their Foundational Paradoxes in the Process of Constitutionalisation. In A. Febbrajo, & G. Corsi (Eds.), Sociology of Constitutions: A Paradoxical Perspective (pp.30-48), London: Routledge.Van Duffel, S. (2012). In Defense of the Will Theory of Rights. Res Publica, 18(4), 231–31.Waluchow, W.J. (1994). Inclusive Legal Positivism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Wyrzykowski, M. (2018). Rule of Law: European Commission v. Poland. In A. Hatje, & L. Tichý (Eds.), Liability of Member States for the Violation of Fundamental Values of the European Union/Europarecht 1 (pp.169-200), Baden-Baden: Nomos.Peter Langford - 2018info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/3645DerechoMoralidadPopulismoViolenciaLawMoralityPopulismViolenceThe populist disruption : juridico-political reflections on democracy, law and rights.The populist disruption : juridico-political reflections on democracy, law and rights.Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2537https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/f15e21b8-7cc4-4af8-afe8-d21fa8e2e432/downloadcd0f8a41907f88881edbf785f2b82b89MD5110983/29997oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/299972024-06-02 14:33:08.826https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Peter Langford - 2018https://repository.ucatolica.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaCbdigital@metabiblioteca.com

The populist disruption : juridico-political reflections on democracy, law and rights.

Publicaciones similares