Methodological individualism versus class analysis : the “great recession” as a test case.

Mientras el análisis económico tradicional se relaciona con otras ramas de las ciencias sociales bajo una perspectiva “imperialista”, el paradigma alternativo de la reproducción social puede contribuir al desarrollo de una aproximación interdisciplinaria a la economía política. Originado en las cons...

Full description

Autores:: Brancaccio, Emiliano
Paul, Gabriella

Tipo de recurso:: Article of journal

Fecha de publicación:: 2019

Institución:: Universidad Católica de Colombia

Repositorio:: RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica

Idioma:: eng

id	UCATOLICA2_6fb168c3ec455da784078a17b6db0f30
oai_identifier_str	oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/29949
network_acronym_str	UCATOLICA2
network_name_str	RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	Methodological individualism versus class analysis : the “great recession” as a test case.
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv	Methodological individualism versus class analysis : the “great recession” as a test case.
title	Methodological individualism versus class analysis : the “great recession” as a test case.
spellingShingle	Methodological individualism versus class analysis : the “great recession” as a test case. Metodología económica Imperialismo Individualismo metodológico Análisis de clase Economic methodology Imperialism Methodological individualism Class analysis
title_short	Methodological individualism versus class analysis : the “great recession” as a test case.
title_full	Methodological individualism versus class analysis : the “great recession” as a test case.
title_fullStr	Methodological individualism versus class analysis : the “great recession” as a test case.
title_full_unstemmed	Methodological individualism versus class analysis : the “great recession” as a test case.
title_sort	Methodological individualism versus class analysis : the “great recession” as a test case.
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Brancaccio, Emiliano Paul, Gabriella
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv	Brancaccio, Emiliano Paul, Gabriella
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	Metodología económica Imperialismo Individualismo metodológico Análisis de clase
topic	Metodología económica Imperialismo Individualismo metodológico Análisis de clase Economic methodology Imperialism Methodological individualism Class analysis
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv	Economic methodology Imperialism Methodological individualism Class analysis
description	Mientras el análisis económico tradicional se relaciona con otras ramas de las ciencias sociales bajo una perspectiva “imperialista”, el paradigma alternativo de la reproducción social puede contribuir al desarrollo de una aproximación interdisciplinaria a la economía política. Originado en las constribuciones de los economistas clásicos y Marx y actualmente desarrollada por las escuelas críticas de pensamiento económico, el paradigma de la reproducción social rechaza las bases individualistas de la Economía dominante y reconoce a las clases sociales y los conflictos relacionados con la producción y la distribución como elementos esenciales para realizar análisis económicos consistentes con la actualidad del capitalismo y su crisis. En este sentido, el paradigma alternativo sugiere una interpretación de la reciente “Gran recesión” basado en la antropología del consumo de las clases sociales al interior del capitalismo y sus implicaciones en el ritmo del gasto agregado. La evidencia empírica avala esta interpretación que, también ofrece algunas luces sobre las posibles relaciones entre las complejas dinámicas espaciales y temporales de la crisis capitalista y el desarrollo internacional de movimientos sociales progresistas.
publishDate	2019
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2019-01-01
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.eng.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.driver.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv	Journal article
dc.type.redcol.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
dc.type.version.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv	10.14718/SoftPower.2019.6.1.2
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv	2539-2239
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	2389-8232
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.14718/SoftPower.2019.6.1.2
identifier_str_mv	10.14718/SoftPower.2019.6.1.2 2539-2239 2389-8232
url	https://doi.org/10.14718/SoftPower.2019.6.1.2
dc.language.iso.eng.fl_str_mv	eng
language	eng
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv	https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/download/3517/3237
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv	Núm. 11 , Año 2019 :Enero - Junio
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv	57
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv	11
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv	32
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv	6
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv	Soft Power
dc.relation.references.eng.fl_str_mv	Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. In (id) Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. New York: Monthly Review Press. Arrow, K.J. (1994). Methodological Individualism and Social Knowledge. The American Economic Review, 84 (2), 1-9. Baran, P. & Sweezy P.M. (1966). Monopoly Capital. New York: Monthly Review Press. Bataille, G. (1991). The Accursed Share, Volume 1: Consumption (1949). New York: Zone Books Bauman, Z. (2000). Modern Liquidity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. Boulding, K.E. (1969). Economics as a Moral Science. American Economic Review, 59(1), 1-12. Blanchard, O. (2000). Macroeconomics (2nd ed). London: Prentice Hall. Blanchard, O., Amighini A., Giavazzi F. (2013) Macroeconomics. A European Perspective. (2nd ed). Harlow: Pearson Education. Brancaccio, E. (2008). Solvency and labour effort in a monetary theory of reproduction. European Journal of Economic and Social Systems, 21, 195-211. Brancaccio, E. (2011). Some Contradictions in “Mainstream” Interpretations of the Crisis and New Perspectives in the Critique of Economic Theory and Policy. In Brancaccio E. & Fontana G. (eds) The global economic crisis. New perspectives on the Critique of Economic Theory and Policy.London-New York: Routledge. Brancaccio, E. (2016). For an International Social Standard on Capital Movements, European Parliament, Conference “Resistance and alternatives to free trade”, GUE/NGL Group, 7 December. Brancaccio, E. & Califano, A. (2018). Anti-Blanchard macroeconomics. A comparative approach. Edward Elgar. Brancaccio, E. & Fontana G. (eds). (2011). The global economic crises. New perspectives on the Critique of Economic Theory and Policy. London-New York: Routledge. Brancaccio, E., Ciccone R., Realfonzo R., Stirati, A., Suppa, D. (2010). Regime di accumulazione, distribuzione del reddito e crisi, Società Italiana degli Economisti, 51° Riunione scientifica annuale, Università di Catania, 15 ottobre. Brancaccio, E. & Fontana, G. (2016). ῾Solvency rule’ and capital centralization in a monetary union. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 40(4), 1055–1075. Cacioppo, J.T. & Berntson, G.G. (2002). Social neuroscience. In Cacioppo J.T., Berntson G. G., Adolphs R., Carter, C. S., Davidson R. J., McClintock M. K, McEwen B., Meaney M. J, Schacter D. L., Sternberg E. M, Suomi S. S., Taylor S. E, Foundations in social neuroscience. Cambridge: MIT Press, 3-10. Carrier J.G. & Heyman, J. McC. (1997). Consumption and Political Economy. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 3(2), 355-273 Kalecki, M. (1939). Essays in the Theory of Economic Fluctuations. London: Allen and Unwin. Clarke, S. (1994). Marx’s Theory of crisis. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press. Dobb, M. (1939). Political economy and capitalism. New York: International Publisher. Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Avon Books. Della Porta, D. (2015). Social movements in times of austerity: bringing capitalism back into protest analysis. Cambridge Malden: Polity Press. Della Porta, D. (2016). Bringing capitalism back in social movement analysis, mimeo. Della Porta, D. & Keating, M. (2008). How many approaches in the social sciences? An epistemological introduction. In Della Porta and Keating (eds.), Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Easterling, S. (2003). Marx’s Theory of Economic crisis. International Socialist Review, 32, November-December. Edgeworth, F.Y. (1981). Mathematical Psychics. London: Kegan Paul. Fine, B. (2000). Economics Imperialism and Intellectual Progress: The Present as History of Economic Thought? History of Economics Review, 32, 10-36. Fitoussi, J.P. & Stiglitz, J. (2009). The ways out of the crisis and the building of a more cohesive world. The Shadow GN, Chair’s Summary, LUISS Guido Carli, Rome, May 6-7. Galbraith, J.K. (1998). The affluent society. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Graeber, D. (2011). “Consumption”. Current Anthropology, 52(4) 489-511. Graziani, A. (2003). The monetary theory of production. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Griffin, R., Pitts, M., Smith, R., Brook, A. (2011). Inequality at late Roman Baldock, UK: The impact of Social Factors on Health and Diet. Journal of Anthropological Research, 67(4), 533-556. Hahn, F. (1982). The Neo-Ricardians. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 6(4), 353-374. Hahn, F. (1985), In praise of economic theory. Money, Growth and Stability. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Hilferding, R. (2011) Il capitale finanziario(1910). Milano-Udine: Mimesis. Hodges, M. (2008). Rethinking time’s arrow. Anthropological Theory, 8(4), 399-429. Hutt, W.H. (1940). The Concept of Consumers’ Sovereignty. Economic Journal, 50(197), 66–77. IMF and ILO (2010). The Challenges of Growth, Employment and Social Cohesion, Joint ILO-IMF conference in cooperation with the office of the Prime Minister of Norway, Oslo, 13 September. IMF (2012). The Quest for Lasting Stability. Global Financial Stability Report, April 2012. World Economic and Financial Surveys, IMF Washington (DC). Jevons, W.S. (1970). The Theory of Political Economy (1871). Baltimore: Penguin. Lavoie, M. (2009). Introduction to Postkyeynesian Economics. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan. Lawson, T. (2006). The Nature of Heterodox Economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30, 483-505. Lucarelli, S., Lunghini, G. (2012). The resistible rise of mainstream economics. The Dominant Theory and the Alternative Economic Theories.Bergamo: Bergamo University press - Sestante. Marx, K. (1994). Il capitale. Critica dell’economia politica (1867-1885-1894). Libro I, II, III. Roma: Editori Riuniti. Miller, D. (1995). Consumption and commodities. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 141-161. Mirowski, P. (1984). Physics and the marginalist revolution. Cambridge Journal of economics, (8), 361-379. Mirowski, P. (1988). Against mechanism; Protecting economics from science. Totowa NJ: Rowman and Littlefield. O’Hara, P.H. (2000). Marx, Veblen and Contemporary Institutional Political Economy. Cheltenham: Elgar. Pareto, V. (1906). Manual of Political Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pauli, J. (2011). Celebrating distinctions. Common and conspicuous weddings in rural Namibia. Ethnology, 50(2), 153-167. Robbins, L. (1932). An essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. London: Macmillan. Samuelson, P. (1947). Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Stigler, G.J. (1984). Economics: The Imperial Science? The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 86(3), 301–313. Tabellini, G. (2009). Il mondo torna a correre. L’Italia non si fermi. In Lezioni per il futuro, Il Sole 24 Ore. Sen, A. (1977). Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs, (6), 317-344. Sweezy, P.M. (1942). The theory of capitalist development: principles of Marxian political economy. New York: Oxford University Press. Veblen, T.B. (1899). The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. New York: The Modern Library. Walras, (1969). Elements of pure economics, London: Allen and Unwin.
dc.rights.eng.fl_str_mv	Emiliano Brancaccio, Gabriella Paul - 2019
dc.rights.accessrights.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.eng.fl_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv	Emiliano Brancaccio, Gabriella Paul - 2019 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.eng.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Soft Power
dc.source.eng.fl_str_mv	https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/3517
institution	Universidad Católica de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/0e95c76a-aecc-4cc8-b4f3-d44f3151e1ea/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	20e09c559f738675e4deb9ab29f18390
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_	1814256336422043648
spelling	Brancaccio, Emiliano085f8402-e3f3-4c6b-b46f-94e08bf1a36e300Paul, Gabrielladceef2cb-5554-41f6-a9c6-7609b022fe3b3002019-01-01T00:00:00Z2019-01-01T00:00:00Z2019-01-01Mientras el análisis económico tradicional se relaciona con otras ramas de las ciencias sociales bajo una perspectiva “imperialista”, el paradigma alternativo de la reproducción social puede contribuir al desarrollo de una aproximación interdisciplinaria a la economía política. Originado en las constribuciones de los economistas clásicos y Marx y actualmente desarrollada por las escuelas críticas de pensamiento económico, el paradigma de la reproducción social rechaza las bases individualistas de la Economía dominante y reconoce a las clases sociales y los conflictos relacionados con la producción y la distribución como elementos esenciales para realizar análisis económicos consistentes con la actualidad del capitalismo y su crisis. En este sentido, el paradigma alternativo sugiere una interpretación de la reciente “Gran recesión” basado en la antropología del consumo de las clases sociales al interior del capitalismo y sus implicaciones en el ritmo del gasto agregado. La evidencia empírica avala esta interpretación que, también ofrece algunas luces sobre las posibles relaciones entre las complejas dinámicas espaciales y temporales de la crisis capitalista y el desarrollo internacional de movimientos sociales progresistas.While the mainstream economic analysis relates with the other branches of social sciences in an “imperialistic” perspective, an alternative paradigm of social reproduction can contribute to develop an interdisciplinary approach to political economy. Originated in the contributions of Classical economists and Marx and currently developed by the critical schools of economic thought, the paradigm of social reproduction rejects the individualistic foundations of mainstream economics and recognize social classes and related conflicts on production and distribution as essential elements to make economic analysis consistent with the current reality of capitalist development and crisis. In this sense, the alternative paradigm suggests an interpretation of the recent “Great Recession” based on the specific anthropology of consumption of social classes within capitalism and its implications on the pace of aggregate expenditure. Empirical evidence gives support to this interpretation, which also offers some insights about the possible relations between the complex spatial and temporal dynamics of capitalist crisis and the international development of progressive social movements.application/pdf10.14718/SoftPower.2019.6.1.22539-22392389-8232https://doi.org/10.14718/SoftPower.2019.6.1.2engSoft Powerhttps://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/download/3517/3237Núm. 11 , Año 2019 :Enero - Junio5711326Soft PowerAlthusser, L. (1971). Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. In (id) Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. New York: Monthly Review Press.Arrow, K.J. (1994). Methodological Individualism and Social Knowledge. The American Economic Review, 84 (2), 1-9.Baran, P. & Sweezy P.M. (1966). Monopoly Capital. New York: Monthly Review Press.Bataille, G. (1991). The Accursed Share, Volume 1: Consumption (1949). New York: Zone BooksBauman, Z. (2000). Modern Liquidity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Boulding, K.E. (1969). Economics as a Moral Science. American Economic Review, 59(1), 1-12.Blanchard, O. (2000). Macroeconomics (2nd ed). London: Prentice Hall.Blanchard, O., Amighini A., Giavazzi F. (2013) Macroeconomics. A European Perspective. (2nd ed). Harlow: Pearson Education.Brancaccio, E. (2008). Solvency and labour effort in a monetary theory of reproduction. European Journal of Economic and Social Systems, 21, 195-211.Brancaccio, E. (2011). Some Contradictions in “Mainstream” Interpretations of the Crisis and New Perspectives in the Critique of Economic Theory and Policy. In Brancaccio E. & Fontana G. (eds) The global economic crisis. New perspectives on the Critique of Economic Theory and Policy.London-New York: Routledge.Brancaccio, E. (2016). For an International Social Standard on Capital Movements, European Parliament, Conference “Resistance and alternatives to free trade”, GUE/NGL Group, 7 December.Brancaccio, E. & Califano, A. (2018). Anti-Blanchard macroeconomics. A comparative approach. Edward Elgar.Brancaccio, E. & Fontana G. (eds). (2011). The global economic crises. New perspectives on the Critique of Economic Theory and Policy. London-New York: Routledge.Brancaccio, E., Ciccone R., Realfonzo R., Stirati, A., Suppa, D. (2010). Regime di accumulazione, distribuzione del reddito e crisi, Società Italiana degli Economisti, 51° Riunione scientifica annuale, Università di Catania, 15 ottobre.Brancaccio, E. & Fontana, G. (2016). ῾Solvency rule’ and capital centralization in a monetary union. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 40(4), 1055–1075.Cacioppo, J.T. & Berntson, G.G. (2002). Social neuroscience. In Cacioppo J.T., Berntson G. G., Adolphs R., Carter, C. S., Davidson R. J., McClintock M. K, McEwen B., Meaney M. J, Schacter D. L., Sternberg E. M, Suomi S. S., Taylor S. E, Foundations in social neuroscience. Cambridge: MIT Press, 3-10.Carrier J.G. & Heyman, J. McC. (1997). Consumption and Political Economy. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 3(2), 355-273Kalecki, M. (1939). Essays in the Theory of Economic Fluctuations. London: Allen and Unwin.Clarke, S. (1994). Marx’s Theory of crisis. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.Dobb, M. (1939). Political economy and capitalism. New York: International Publisher.Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Avon Books.Della Porta, D. (2015). Social movements in times of austerity: bringing capitalism back into protest analysis. Cambridge Malden: Polity Press.Della Porta, D. (2016). Bringing capitalism back in social movement analysis, mimeo.Della Porta, D. & Keating, M. (2008). How many approaches in the social sciences? An epistemological introduction. In Della Porta and Keating (eds.), Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Easterling, S. (2003). Marx’s Theory of Economic crisis. International Socialist Review, 32, November-December.Edgeworth, F.Y. (1981). Mathematical Psychics. London: Kegan Paul.Fine, B. (2000). Economics Imperialism and Intellectual Progress: The Present as History of Economic Thought? History of Economics Review, 32, 10-36.Fitoussi, J.P. & Stiglitz, J. (2009). The ways out of the crisis and the building of a more cohesive world. The Shadow GN, Chair’s Summary, LUISS Guido Carli, Rome, May 6-7.Galbraith, J.K. (1998). The affluent society. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Graeber, D. (2011). “Consumption”. Current Anthropology, 52(4) 489-511.Graziani, A. (2003). The monetary theory of production. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Griffin, R., Pitts, M., Smith, R., Brook, A. (2011). Inequality at late Roman Baldock, UK: The impact of Social Factors on Health and Diet. Journal of Anthropological Research, 67(4), 533-556.Hahn, F. (1982). The Neo-Ricardians. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 6(4), 353-374.Hahn, F. (1985), In praise of economic theory. Money, Growth and Stability. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Hilferding, R. (2011) Il capitale finanziario(1910). Milano-Udine: Mimesis.Hodges, M. (2008). Rethinking time’s arrow. Anthropological Theory, 8(4), 399-429.Hutt, W.H. (1940). The Concept of Consumers’ Sovereignty. Economic Journal, 50(197), 66–77.IMF and ILO (2010). The Challenges of Growth, Employment and Social Cohesion, Joint ILO-IMF conference in cooperation with the office of the Prime Minister of Norway, Oslo, 13 September.IMF (2012). The Quest for Lasting Stability. Global Financial Stability Report, April 2012. World Economic and Financial Surveys, IMF Washington (DC).Jevons, W.S. (1970). The Theory of Political Economy (1871). Baltimore: Penguin.Lavoie, M. (2009). Introduction to Postkyeynesian Economics. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan.Lawson, T. (2006). The Nature of Heterodox Economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30, 483-505.Lucarelli, S., Lunghini, G. (2012). The resistible rise of mainstream economics. The Dominant Theory and the Alternative Economic Theories.Bergamo: Bergamo University press - Sestante.Marx, K. (1994). Il capitale. Critica dell’economia politica (1867-1885-1894). Libro I, II, III. Roma: Editori Riuniti.Miller, D. (1995). Consumption and commodities. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 141-161.Mirowski, P. (1984). Physics and the marginalist revolution. Cambridge Journal of economics, (8), 361-379.Mirowski, P. (1988). Against mechanism; Protecting economics from science. Totowa NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.O’Hara, P.H. (2000). Marx, Veblen and Contemporary Institutional Political Economy. Cheltenham: Elgar.Pareto, V. (1906). Manual of Political Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Pauli, J. (2011). Celebrating distinctions. Common and conspicuous weddings in rural Namibia. Ethnology, 50(2), 153-167.Robbins, L. (1932). An essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. London: Macmillan.Samuelson, P. (1947). Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Stigler, G.J. (1984). Economics: The Imperial Science? The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 86(3), 301–313.Tabellini, G. (2009). Il mondo torna a correre. L’Italia non si fermi. In Lezioni per il futuro, Il Sole 24 Ore.Sen, A. (1977). Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs, (6), 317-344.Sweezy, P.M. (1942). The theory of capitalist development: principles of Marxian political economy. New York: Oxford University Press.Veblen, T.B. (1899). The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. New York: The Modern Library.Walras, (1969). Elements of pure economics, London: Allen and Unwin.Emiliano Brancaccio, Gabriella Paul - 2019info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/3517Metodología económicaImperialismoIndividualismo metodológicoAnálisis de claseEconomic methodologyImperialismMethodological individualismClass analysisMethodological individualism versus class analysis : the “great recession” as a test case.Methodological individualism versus class analysis : the “great recession” as a test case.Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2582https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/0e95c76a-aecc-4cc8-b4f3-d44f3151e1ea/download20e09c559f738675e4deb9ab29f18390MD5110983/29949oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/299492024-06-02 14:32:25.729https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Emiliano Brancaccio, Gabriella Paul - 2019https://repository.ucatolica.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaCbdigital@metabiblioteca.com

Methodological individualism versus class analysis : the “great recession” as a test case.

Publicaciones similares