Comparación de la salud subjetiva entre prototipos de personalidad recuperados en población general de México.

El objetivo de este estudio fue obtener prototipos de personalidad en población general de México y comparar la salud subjetiva entre ellos. En total, participaron 994 individuos de 14 a 63 años de edad. Se evaluaron cinco rasgos de personalidad (Neuroticismo, Extraversión, Apertura, Responsabilidad...

Full description

Autores:
Solís-Cámara, Pedro
Meda-Lara, Rosa Martha
Moreno-Jiménez, Bernardo
Palomera-Chávez, Andrés
Juárez-Rodríguez, Pedro
Tipo de recurso:
Article of investigation
Fecha de publicación:
2017
Institución:
Universidad Católica de Colombia
Repositorio:
RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/28358
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/10983/28358
https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2017.20.2.10
Palabra clave:
Non-resilient
Personality
Prototypes
Resilient
Health
Self diciplined
No-resiliente
Personalidad
Prototipos
Resiliente
Salud
Disciplinado
Não resiliente
Personalidade
Protótipos
Resiliente
Saúde
Disciplinado
Rights
openAccess
License
Pedro Solís-Cámara - 2017
id UCATOLICA2_6cca0a41df97b680ed26925185177053
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/28358
network_acronym_str UCATOLICA2
network_name_str RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Comparación de la salud subjetiva entre prototipos de personalidad recuperados en población general de México.
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv Comparison of subjective health between personality prototypes extracted from general population of Mexico.
title Comparación de la salud subjetiva entre prototipos de personalidad recuperados en población general de México.
spellingShingle Comparación de la salud subjetiva entre prototipos de personalidad recuperados en población general de México.
Non-resilient
Personality
Prototypes
Resilient
Health
Self diciplined
No-resiliente
Personalidad
Prototipos
Resiliente
Salud
Disciplinado
Não resiliente
Personalidade
Protótipos
Resiliente
Saúde
Disciplinado
title_short Comparación de la salud subjetiva entre prototipos de personalidad recuperados en población general de México.
title_full Comparación de la salud subjetiva entre prototipos de personalidad recuperados en población general de México.
title_fullStr Comparación de la salud subjetiva entre prototipos de personalidad recuperados en población general de México.
title_full_unstemmed Comparación de la salud subjetiva entre prototipos de personalidad recuperados en población general de México.
title_sort Comparación de la salud subjetiva entre prototipos de personalidad recuperados en población general de México.
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Solís-Cámara, Pedro
Meda-Lara, Rosa Martha
Moreno-Jiménez, Bernardo
Palomera-Chávez, Andrés
Juárez-Rodríguez, Pedro
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Solís-Cámara, Pedro
Meda-Lara, Rosa Martha
Moreno-Jiménez, Bernardo
Palomera-Chávez, Andrés
Juárez-Rodríguez, Pedro
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Non-resilient
Personality
Prototypes
Resilient
Health
Self diciplined
topic Non-resilient
Personality
Prototypes
Resilient
Health
Self diciplined
No-resiliente
Personalidad
Prototipos
Resiliente
Salud
Disciplinado
Não resiliente
Personalidade
Protótipos
Resiliente
Saúde
Disciplinado
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv No-resiliente
Personalidad
Prototipos
Resiliente
Salud
Disciplinado
Não resiliente
Personalidade
Protótipos
Resiliente
Saúde
Disciplinado
description El objetivo de este estudio fue obtener prototipos de personalidad en población general de México y comparar la salud subjetiva entre ellos. En total, participaron 994 individuos de 14 a 63 años de edad. Se evaluaron cinco rasgos de personalidad (Neuroticismo, Extraversión, Apertura, Responsabilidad y Amabilidad) con el NEO-FFI, y la salud subjetiva con el GHQ-12 y una pregunta sobre el estado de salud. Para corroborar la consistencia de los prototipos se dividió la muestra en dos grupos de edad: joven (de 14 a 25 años) y maduro (de 26 a 63 años). Y como resultado se recuperaron tres prototipos en ambos grupos: las personas Resilientes bajo neuroticismo y alto en el resto de los rasgos, quienes tuvieron la mejor salud subjetiva; lasNo-Resilientes alto neuroticismo y bajo en el resto de los rasgos, que presentaron la peor salud subjetiva; y las personas disciplinadas alto en responsabilidad y promedio en los otros rasgos, que presentaron una salud subjetiva intermedia en comparación con los otros prototipos. Finalmente, la autodisciplina y la resiliencia fueron los rasgos que discriminaron mejor la buena salud. Los hallazgos se discuten en términos de la generalización de prototipos a través de culturas.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2017-07-01 00:00:00
2023-01-23T15:41:41Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2017-07-01 00:00:00
2023-01-23T15:41:41Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2017-07-01
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv Journal article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.14718/ACP.2017.20.2.10
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 1909-9711
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0123-9155
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10983/28358
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2017.20.2.10
identifier_str_mv 10.14718/ACP.2017.20.2.10
1909-9711
0123-9155
url https://hdl.handle.net/10983/28358
https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2017.20.2.10
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/1115/esp
https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/1115/ENG
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv Núm. 2 , Año 2017 : Vol.20, Núm. 2.
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv 213
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv 2
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv 200
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv 20
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv Acta Colombiana de Psicología
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv Akse, J., Hale, W. W. III, Engels, R. C. M. E., Raaijmakers, Q. A. W. & Meeus, W. H. J. (2004). Personality, perceived parental rejection and problem behavior in adolescence. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 39, 980-988.
Akse, J., Hale, W. W. III., Engels, R. C. M. E., Raaijmakers, Q. A. W. & Meeus, W. H. J. (2007). Co-occurrence of depression and delinquency in personality types. European Journal of Personality, 21, 235-256.
Alessandri, G., Vecchione, M., Donnellan, B. M., Eisenberg, N., Caprara G. V. & Cieciuch, J. (2014). On the cross-cultural replicability of the resilient, undercontrolled, and overcontrolled personality types. Journal of Personality, 82(4), 340-353.
Asendorpf, J. B., Borkenau, P., Ostendorpf, F. & van Aken, M. A. G. (2001). Carving personality description at its joints: Confirmation of three replicable personality prototypes for both child and adults. European Journal of Personality, 15, 169-198. doi: 10.1002/per.408
Avdeyeva, T. V. & Church, A. T. (2005). The cross-cultural generalizability of personality types: A Philippine study. European Journal of Personality, 19, 475-499.
Barbaranelli, C. (2002). Evaluating cluster analysis solutions: An application to the Italian NEO Personality Inventory. European Journal of Personality, 16, s43-s55.
Boehm, B., Asendorpf, J. B. & Avia, M. D. (2002). Replicable types and subtypes of personality: Spanish NEO-PI samples. European Journal of Personality, 16, s25-s41.
Borkenau, P., Hrebícková, M., Kuppens, P., Realo, A. & Allik, J. (2013). Sex differences in variability in personality: A study in four samples. Journal of Personality, 81(1), 49-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00784.x
Caspi, A. (1998). Personality development accross the life course. En W. Damon, & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 311-388). New York: Wiley.
Chapman, B. P. & Goldberg, L. G. (2011). Replicability and 40-year predictive power of childhood ARC types. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(3), 593-606. doi: 10.1037/a0024289 Costa, P. T. Jr. & McCrae, R. (2008). Inventario de personalidad NEO Revisado (NEO PI-R). Inventario NEO Reducido de Cinco Factores (NEO-FFI). Manual Profesional (3ra. edición revisada y ampliada). Madrid, España: TEA Ediciones S. A.
De Fruyt, F., Mervielde, I. & Van Leeuwen, K. (2002). The consistency of personality type classification across samples and five-factor measures. European Journal of Personality, 16, s57-s72. doi: 10.1002/per.444
Díaz-Guerrero, R. (2012). Psicología del Mexicano. Descubrimiento de la etnopsicología (6ta. ed., reimpresión). México, DF: Trillas.
Donnellan, M. B. & Robins, R. W. (2010). Resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled personality types: Issues and controversies. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 3, 1-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00313.x
Ekehammar, B. & Akrami, N. (2003). The relation between personality and prejudice: A variable- and a person-centered approach. European Journal of Personality, 17, 449-464. doi: 10.1002/per.494
García, O. Aluja, A. & García, L. F. (2004). Psychometric properties of the Goldberg's 50 Personality Markers for the Big Five Model: A study in Spanish language. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20(4), 310-319.
Goldberg, D. P. & Williams, P. (1988). A user’s guide to the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.
González, S., Tello, J., Silva, P., Lüders, C., Butelmann, S., Fristch, R., Solar, F., et al. (2012). Calidad de vida en pacientes con discapacidad motora según factores sociodemográficos y salud mental. Revista Chilena de Neuro-Psiquiatría, 50 (1), 23-34.
Hankins, M. (2008). The reliability of the twelve-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) under realistic assumptions. BMC Public Health, 8, 355.
Hart, D., Burock, D., London, B., Atkins, R. & Bonilla-Santiago, G. (2005). The relation of personality types to physiological, behavioural, and cognitive processes. European Journal of Personality, 19, 391-407.
Hernández, R., Fernández, C. & Baptista, P. (2010). Metodología de la investigación. (5ta. ed.). Peru: McGraw-Hill.
Herzberg, P. Y. (2009). Beyond accident-proneness: Using five-factor model prototypes to predict driving behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1096-1100. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.08.008
Herzberg, P. Y. & Roth, M. (2006). Beyond resilients, undercontrollers, and overcontrollers? An extension of personality prototype research. European Journal of Personality, 20, 5-28. doi: 10.1002/per.557
Hoyle, R. H. (2010). Personality and self-regulation. En Rick H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of personality and self-regulation (pp. 1-18). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Isler, L., Liu, J. H., Sibley, C. G. & Fletcher, G. J. O. (2016). Self-Regulation and personality profiles: Empirical development, longitudinal stability and predictive ability. European Journal of Personality, 30(3), 274-287. doi: 10.1002/per.2054
Kaleta, D., PolaTska, K., Dziankowska-Zaborszcsyk, E., Hanke, W. & Drygas, W. (2009). Factors influencing self-perception of health status. Central European Journal of Public Health, 17(3), 122-127.
Kinnunen, M. L., Metsäpelto, R. L., Feldt, T., Kokko, K., Tolvanen, A., Kinnunen, U., Leppänen, E., et al. (2012). Personality profiles and health: Longitudinal evidence among Finnish adults. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 53, 512-522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2012.00969.x
Klimstra, T. A., Hale, W. W.. III, Raaijmakers, Q. A. W., Branje, S. J. T. & Meeus, W. H. J. (2010). A developmental typology of adolescent personality. European Journal of Personality, 24, 309-323.
McDowell, I. (2006). Measuring health? a guide to rating scales and questionnaires (3ª.ed.). New York: Oxford Press.
Miller, J. D. (2012). Five-factor model personality disorder prototypes: A review of their development, validity, and comparison to alternative approaches. Journal of Personality, 80(6), 1565-1591.
Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N., Shiner, R., Caspi, A. & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 313-345.
Robins, R. W., John, O. P., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E. & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1996). Resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled boys: Three replicable personality types. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 157-171.
Roth, M. & von Collani, G. (2007). A head-to-head comparison of big five types and traits in the prediction of social attitudes: Further evidence for a five-cluster typology. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 138-149.
Sánchez-López, M. P. & Dresch, V. (2008). The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12): Reliability, external validity and factor structure in the Spanish population. Psicothema, 20 (4), 839-843.
Smith, T. W., Williams, P. G. & Segerstrom, S. C. (2015). Personality and physical health. En M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Editors-in-Chief), Handbook of personality and social psychology: Vol. 4. Personality processes and individual differences (pp. 639-661. Washington: American Psychological Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/14343-029
Smith, A. B., Oluboyede, Y., West, R., Hewison, J. & House, A. O. (2013). The factor structure of the GHQ-12: the interaction between item phrasing, variance and levels of distress. Quality of Life Research, 22, 145-152.
Sociedad Mexicana de Psicología. (2007). Código ÿtico del Psicólogo. México: Trillas.
Solís-Cámara, P., Meda Lara, R. M., Moreno-Jiménez, B. & Juárez, P. (2016). Estructura factorial del Cuestionario de Salud General GHQ-12 en población general de México. Salud & Sociedad, 7(1), 62-76.
Steca, P., Alessandri, G. & Caprara, G. V. (2010). The utility of a well-known personality typology in studying successful aging: Resilients, undercontrollers, and overcontrollers in old age. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 442-446. Steinley, D. (2003). Local optima in K-means clustering: What you don?t know may hurt you. Psychological Methods, 8, 294-304.
Strus, W., Cieciuch, J. & Rowinski, T. (2014). The circumplex of personality metatraits: A synthesizing model of personality based on the big five. Review of General Psychology 18, (4), 273-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000017
Tuuliainen/Kirsi Sipilä, L., Mäki, P., Könönen, M. & Suominen, A. L. (2015). Association between clinical signs of temporomandibular disorders and psychological distress among an adult Finnish population. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache, 29(4), 370-377. doi: 10.11607/ofph.1439
Urzúa, A., Caqueo-Urízar, A., Bargsted, M. & Irarrázaval, M. (2015). ¿Afecta la forma de puntuación la estructura factorial de GHQ-12? Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 31(6), 1305-1312.
Van Leeuwen, K., De Fruyt, F. & Mervielde, I. (2004). A longitudinal study of the utility of the resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled personality types as predictors of children’s and adolescents’ problem behavior. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 210-220. http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/pp/01650254.html
Weir, R. C. & Gjerde, P. F. (2002). Preschool personality prototypes: Internal coherence, cross-study replicability, and developmental outcomes in adolescence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1229-1241.
Xie, X., Chen,W., Lei, L., Xing, C. & Zhang, Y. (2016). The relationship between personality types and prosocial behavior and aggression in Chinese adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 95, 56-61.
Zawadzki, B. & Strelau, J. (2003). Trzy podstawowe typy czy cztery struktury temperamentu’ [Three basic types or four structures of temperament?]. Czasopismo Psychologiczne, 6, 271-285.
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv Pedro Solís-Cámara - 2017
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv Pedro Solís-Cámara - 2017
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Católica de Colombia
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/1115
institution Universidad Católica de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/01b4f3a7-c60b-4ea4-83f4-d0314bcab4b5/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 26c6b5af7ce9c93089e2cb3f0fac37c9
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_ 1812183398935953408
spelling Solís-Cámara, Pedro0531a0ed-12d8-43f8-a92b-ce89e7567759300Meda-Lara, Rosa Martha9d5be81c-650b-4be3-9bf7-7fb6ab99684eMoreno-Jiménez, Bernardo08c97e86-44cb-4c3c-a283-a0387cbdd1e9Palomera-Chávez, Andrés03ce2eb9-a87b-4433-990c-ed9cb9199e18Juárez-Rodríguez, Pedro0c0ebe86-dad2-4d8f-8e99-cb8bb6abc2582017-07-01 00:00:002023-01-23T15:41:41Z2017-07-01 00:00:002023-01-23T15:41:41Z2017-07-01El objetivo de este estudio fue obtener prototipos de personalidad en población general de México y comparar la salud subjetiva entre ellos. En total, participaron 994 individuos de 14 a 63 años de edad. Se evaluaron cinco rasgos de personalidad (Neuroticismo, Extraversión, Apertura, Responsabilidad y Amabilidad) con el NEO-FFI, y la salud subjetiva con el GHQ-12 y una pregunta sobre el estado de salud. Para corroborar la consistencia de los prototipos se dividió la muestra en dos grupos de edad: joven (de 14 a 25 años) y maduro (de 26 a 63 años). Y como resultado se recuperaron tres prototipos en ambos grupos: las personas Resilientes bajo neuroticismo y alto en el resto de los rasgos, quienes tuvieron la mejor salud subjetiva; lasNo-Resilientes alto neuroticismo y bajo en el resto de los rasgos, que presentaron la peor salud subjetiva; y las personas disciplinadas alto en responsabilidad y promedio en los otros rasgos, que presentaron una salud subjetiva intermedia en comparación con los otros prototipos. Finalmente, la autodisciplina y la resiliencia fueron los rasgos que discriminaron mejor la buena salud. Los hallazgos se discuten en términos de la generalización de prototipos a través de culturas.The objective of this study was to extract personality prototypes from general population of Mexico and to compare subjective health indicators between these prototypes. Participants were 994 individuals (aged 14 to 63 years). Five personality traits (Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness, Conscientiousness, and Agreeableness) were assessed with the NEO-FFI. Subjective indicators of health (self-rated health and psychological distress) were assessed with a question regarding health status and the GHQ-12. To verify the consistency of the prototypes, the sample was divided into two age groups, young (14 to 25 years) and mature (26 to 63 years.). Three stable prototypes were recovered from both groups. Resilient individuals (low neuroticism and high in other traits) had the best subjective health; the Non-Resilient individuals (high neuroticism and low in other traits) had the worst subjective health; and Self-Disciplined individuals (high conscientiousness and medium scores in other traits) were in the middle of these extremes in subjective health. Self-discipline and resilience were most discriminative in terms of subjective health. Findings are discussed in terms of the generalization of prototypes across cultures.application/pdfapplication/pdf10.14718/ACP.2017.20.2.101909-97110123-9155https://hdl.handle.net/10983/28358https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2017.20.2.10spaUniversidad Católica de Colombiahttps://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/1115/esphttps://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/1115/ENGNúm. 2 , Año 2017 : Vol.20, Núm. 2.213220020Acta Colombiana de PsicologíaAkse, J., Hale, W. W. III, Engels, R. C. M. E., Raaijmakers, Q. A. W. & Meeus, W. H. J. (2004). Personality, perceived parental rejection and problem behavior in adolescence. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 39, 980-988.Akse, J., Hale, W. W. III., Engels, R. C. M. E., Raaijmakers, Q. A. W. & Meeus, W. H. J. (2007). Co-occurrence of depression and delinquency in personality types. European Journal of Personality, 21, 235-256.Alessandri, G., Vecchione, M., Donnellan, B. M., Eisenberg, N., Caprara G. V. & Cieciuch, J. (2014). On the cross-cultural replicability of the resilient, undercontrolled, and overcontrolled personality types. Journal of Personality, 82(4), 340-353.Asendorpf, J. B., Borkenau, P., Ostendorpf, F. & van Aken, M. A. G. (2001). Carving personality description at its joints: Confirmation of three replicable personality prototypes for both child and adults. European Journal of Personality, 15, 169-198. doi: 10.1002/per.408Avdeyeva, T. V. & Church, A. T. (2005). The cross-cultural generalizability of personality types: A Philippine study. European Journal of Personality, 19, 475-499.Barbaranelli, C. (2002). Evaluating cluster analysis solutions: An application to the Italian NEO Personality Inventory. European Journal of Personality, 16, s43-s55.Boehm, B., Asendorpf, J. B. & Avia, M. D. (2002). Replicable types and subtypes of personality: Spanish NEO-PI samples. European Journal of Personality, 16, s25-s41.Borkenau, P., Hrebícková, M., Kuppens, P., Realo, A. & Allik, J. (2013). Sex differences in variability in personality: A study in four samples. Journal of Personality, 81(1), 49-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00784.xCaspi, A. (1998). Personality development accross the life course. En W. Damon, & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 311-388). New York: Wiley.Chapman, B. P. & Goldberg, L. G. (2011). Replicability and 40-year predictive power of childhood ARC types. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(3), 593-606. doi: 10.1037/a0024289 Costa, P. T. Jr. & McCrae, R. (2008). Inventario de personalidad NEO Revisado (NEO PI-R). Inventario NEO Reducido de Cinco Factores (NEO-FFI). Manual Profesional (3ra. edición revisada y ampliada). Madrid, España: TEA Ediciones S. A.De Fruyt, F., Mervielde, I. & Van Leeuwen, K. (2002). The consistency of personality type classification across samples and five-factor measures. European Journal of Personality, 16, s57-s72. doi: 10.1002/per.444Díaz-Guerrero, R. (2012). Psicología del Mexicano. Descubrimiento de la etnopsicología (6ta. ed., reimpresión). México, DF: Trillas.Donnellan, M. B. & Robins, R. W. (2010). Resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled personality types: Issues and controversies. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 3, 1-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00313.xEkehammar, B. & Akrami, N. (2003). The relation between personality and prejudice: A variable- and a person-centered approach. European Journal of Personality, 17, 449-464. doi: 10.1002/per.494García, O. Aluja, A. & García, L. F. (2004). Psychometric properties of the Goldberg's 50 Personality Markers for the Big Five Model: A study in Spanish language. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20(4), 310-319.Goldberg, D. P. & Williams, P. (1988). A user’s guide to the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.González, S., Tello, J., Silva, P., Lüders, C., Butelmann, S., Fristch, R., Solar, F., et al. (2012). Calidad de vida en pacientes con discapacidad motora según factores sociodemográficos y salud mental. Revista Chilena de Neuro-Psiquiatría, 50 (1), 23-34.Hankins, M. (2008). The reliability of the twelve-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) under realistic assumptions. BMC Public Health, 8, 355.Hart, D., Burock, D., London, B., Atkins, R. & Bonilla-Santiago, G. (2005). The relation of personality types to physiological, behavioural, and cognitive processes. European Journal of Personality, 19, 391-407.Hernández, R., Fernández, C. & Baptista, P. (2010). Metodología de la investigación. (5ta. ed.). Peru: McGraw-Hill.Herzberg, P. Y. (2009). Beyond accident-proneness: Using five-factor model prototypes to predict driving behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1096-1100. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.08.008Herzberg, P. Y. & Roth, M. (2006). Beyond resilients, undercontrollers, and overcontrollers? An extension of personality prototype research. European Journal of Personality, 20, 5-28. doi: 10.1002/per.557Hoyle, R. H. (2010). Personality and self-regulation. En Rick H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of personality and self-regulation (pp. 1-18). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Isler, L., Liu, J. H., Sibley, C. G. & Fletcher, G. J. O. (2016). Self-Regulation and personality profiles: Empirical development, longitudinal stability and predictive ability. European Journal of Personality, 30(3), 274-287. doi: 10.1002/per.2054Kaleta, D., PolaTska, K., Dziankowska-Zaborszcsyk, E., Hanke, W. & Drygas, W. (2009). Factors influencing self-perception of health status. Central European Journal of Public Health, 17(3), 122-127.Kinnunen, M. L., Metsäpelto, R. L., Feldt, T., Kokko, K., Tolvanen, A., Kinnunen, U., Leppänen, E., et al. (2012). Personality profiles and health: Longitudinal evidence among Finnish adults. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 53, 512-522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2012.00969.xKlimstra, T. A., Hale, W. W.. III, Raaijmakers, Q. A. W., Branje, S. J. T. & Meeus, W. H. J. (2010). A developmental typology of adolescent personality. European Journal of Personality, 24, 309-323.McDowell, I. (2006). Measuring health? a guide to rating scales and questionnaires (3ª.ed.). New York: Oxford Press.Miller, J. D. (2012). Five-factor model personality disorder prototypes: A review of their development, validity, and comparison to alternative approaches. Journal of Personality, 80(6), 1565-1591.Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N., Shiner, R., Caspi, A. & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 313-345.Robins, R. W., John, O. P., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E. & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1996). Resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled boys: Three replicable personality types. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 157-171.Roth, M. & von Collani, G. (2007). A head-to-head comparison of big five types and traits in the prediction of social attitudes: Further evidence for a five-cluster typology. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 138-149.Sánchez-López, M. P. & Dresch, V. (2008). The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12): Reliability, external validity and factor structure in the Spanish population. Psicothema, 20 (4), 839-843.Smith, T. W., Williams, P. G. & Segerstrom, S. C. (2015). Personality and physical health. En M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Editors-in-Chief), Handbook of personality and social psychology: Vol. 4. Personality processes and individual differences (pp. 639-661. Washington: American Psychological Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/14343-029Smith, A. B., Oluboyede, Y., West, R., Hewison, J. & House, A. O. (2013). The factor structure of the GHQ-12: the interaction between item phrasing, variance and levels of distress. Quality of Life Research, 22, 145-152.Sociedad Mexicana de Psicología. (2007). Código ÿtico del Psicólogo. México: Trillas.Solís-Cámara, P., Meda Lara, R. M., Moreno-Jiménez, B. & Juárez, P. (2016). Estructura factorial del Cuestionario de Salud General GHQ-12 en población general de México. Salud & Sociedad, 7(1), 62-76.Steca, P., Alessandri, G. & Caprara, G. V. (2010). The utility of a well-known personality typology in studying successful aging: Resilients, undercontrollers, and overcontrollers in old age. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 442-446. Steinley, D. (2003). Local optima in K-means clustering: What you don?t know may hurt you. Psychological Methods, 8, 294-304.Strus, W., Cieciuch, J. & Rowinski, T. (2014). The circumplex of personality metatraits: A synthesizing model of personality based on the big five. Review of General Psychology 18, (4), 273-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000017Tuuliainen/Kirsi Sipilä, L., Mäki, P., Könönen, M. & Suominen, A. L. (2015). Association between clinical signs of temporomandibular disorders and psychological distress among an adult Finnish population. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache, 29(4), 370-377. doi: 10.11607/ofph.1439Urzúa, A., Caqueo-Urízar, A., Bargsted, M. & Irarrázaval, M. (2015). ¿Afecta la forma de puntuación la estructura factorial de GHQ-12? Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 31(6), 1305-1312.Van Leeuwen, K., De Fruyt, F. & Mervielde, I. (2004). A longitudinal study of the utility of the resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled personality types as predictors of children’s and adolescents’ problem behavior. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 210-220. http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/pp/01650254.htmlWeir, R. C. & Gjerde, P. F. (2002). Preschool personality prototypes: Internal coherence, cross-study replicability, and developmental outcomes in adolescence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1229-1241.Xie, X., Chen,W., Lei, L., Xing, C. & Zhang, Y. (2016). The relationship between personality types and prosocial behavior and aggression in Chinese adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 95, 56-61.Zawadzki, B. & Strelau, J. (2003). Trzy podstawowe typy czy cztery struktury temperamentu’ [Three basic types or four structures of temperament?]. Czasopismo Psychologiczne, 6, 271-285.Pedro Solís-Cámara - 2017info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/1115Non-resilientPersonalityPrototypesResilientHealthSelf diciplinedNo-resilientePersonalidadPrototiposResilienteSaludDisciplinadoNão resilientePersonalidadeProtótiposResilienteSaúdeDisciplinadoComparación de la salud subjetiva entre prototipos de personalidad recuperados en población general de México.Comparison of subjective health between personality prototypes extracted from general population of Mexico.Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml3408https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/01b4f3a7-c60b-4ea4-83f4-d0314bcab4b5/download26c6b5af7ce9c93089e2cb3f0fac37c9MD5110983/28358oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/283582023-03-24 17:06:18.235https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Pedro Solís-Cámara - 2017https://repository.ucatolica.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaCbdigital@metabiblioteca.com

Publicaciones similares