The power and the sacred: the impossible goodbye? Between political theology and economic theology

What holds together the social order? This question recurs even in post-traditional conceptions of the social bond and, explicitly or implicitly, leads to the relationship between power and pre-political sources of the legitimacy. Secularization is not liberation from the religious. The fact that po...

Full description

Autores:
Preterossi, Geminello
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2016
Institución:
Universidad Católica de Colombia
Repositorio:
RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/23187
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/10983/23187
Palabra clave:
POLITICAL THEOLOGY
ECONOMIC THEOLOGY
SECULARIZATION
MODERNITY
NEOLIBERALISM
TEOLOGÍA POLÍTICA
TEOLOGÍA ECONÓMICA
SECULARIZACIÓN
MODERNIDAD
NEOLIBERALISMO
Rights
openAccess
License
Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2016
id UCATOLICA2_68c681afa84e8cf4d4058c96ec991778
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/23187
network_acronym_str UCATOLICA2
network_name_str RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
repository_id_str
spelling Preterossi, Geminello3c6038ce-71c7-4178-8b2c-6e54ac544896-12019-06-06T00:04:52Z2019-06-06T00:04:52Z2016-01What holds together the social order? This question recurs even in post-traditional conceptions of the social bond and, explicitly or implicitly, leads to the relationship between power and pre-political sources of the legitimacy. Secularization is not liberation from the religious. The fact that politics, with modernity, occupy the space of religion charges politics itself of a supplementary symbolic function. The economic theology is not a paradigm change: neither the obliteration of political theology and its replacement with a different model. The economic theology is a disguised political theology.¿Qué es lo que mantiene el orden social? Esta pregunta está presente también en las concepciones postradicionales del vínculo social y, explícita o implícitamente, lleva a la relación entre poder y fuentes prepolíticas de la legitimidad. La secularización no significa liberarse de lo religioso. El hecho de que la política, con la modernidad, sustituya a la religión carga a la política misma de una función simbólica suplementaria. La teología económica no es un cambio de paradigma, no es la eliminación de la teología política y su sustitución con un modelo diverso. La teología económica es una teología política disfrazada.application/pdfPreterossi, G. (2016). The power and the sacred: the impossible goodbye? Between political theology and economic theology. Soft Power, 3(1), 99-107. Recuperado de https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/ojsucatolica/revistas_ucatolica/index.php/SoftP/article/view/1808/16482389-8232https://hdl.handle.net/10983/23187engUniversidad Católica de Colombia. Facultad de DerechoSoft Power, Vol. 3, no. 1 (ene.-jun. 2016); p. 99-107Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2016info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2POLITICAL THEOLOGYECONOMIC THEOLOGYSECULARIZATIONMODERNITYNEOLIBERALISMTEOLOGÍA POLÍTICATEOLOGÍA ECONÓMICASECULARIZACIÓNMODERNIDADNEOLIBERALISMOThe power and the sacred: the impossible goodbye? Between political theology and economic theologyArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85PublicationORIGINALThe power and the sacred.pdfThe power and the sacred.pdfThe power and the sacred: the impossible goodbye?application/pdf87938https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/1e8a04e0-74d7-42dc-a1a1-5a04202b5812/downloade079c70bea2159ff4e5fc5852efa963dMD51TEXTThe power and the sacred.pdf.txtThe power and the sacred.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain26931https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/28fc1548-62a7-4a85-99f5-dbdbfeb0f823/downloade70c2251b5e431c83865952ae01324c4MD52THUMBNAILThe power and the sacred.pdf.jpgThe power and the sacred.pdf.jpgRIUCACimage/jpeg7973https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/a8f14954-61b4-4246-826d-4263235342d3/downloadd2861dfd4a3a92c0ba23d9ffc2665de0MD5310983/23187oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/231872023-03-24 16:32:00.976https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2016https://repository.ucatolica.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaCbdigital@metabiblioteca.com
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv The power and the sacred: the impossible goodbye? Between political theology and economic theology
title The power and the sacred: the impossible goodbye? Between political theology and economic theology
spellingShingle The power and the sacred: the impossible goodbye? Between political theology and economic theology
POLITICAL THEOLOGY
ECONOMIC THEOLOGY
SECULARIZATION
MODERNITY
NEOLIBERALISM
TEOLOGÍA POLÍTICA
TEOLOGÍA ECONÓMICA
SECULARIZACIÓN
MODERNIDAD
NEOLIBERALISMO
title_short The power and the sacred: the impossible goodbye? Between political theology and economic theology
title_full The power and the sacred: the impossible goodbye? Between political theology and economic theology
title_fullStr The power and the sacred: the impossible goodbye? Between political theology and economic theology
title_full_unstemmed The power and the sacred: the impossible goodbye? Between political theology and economic theology
title_sort The power and the sacred: the impossible goodbye? Between political theology and economic theology
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Preterossi, Geminello
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Preterossi, Geminello
dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv POLITICAL THEOLOGY
ECONOMIC THEOLOGY
SECULARIZATION
MODERNITY
NEOLIBERALISM
TEOLOGÍA POLÍTICA
TEOLOGÍA ECONÓMICA
SECULARIZACIÓN
MODERNIDAD
NEOLIBERALISMO
topic POLITICAL THEOLOGY
ECONOMIC THEOLOGY
SECULARIZATION
MODERNITY
NEOLIBERALISM
TEOLOGÍA POLÍTICA
TEOLOGÍA ECONÓMICA
SECULARIZACIÓN
MODERNIDAD
NEOLIBERALISMO
description What holds together the social order? This question recurs even in post-traditional conceptions of the social bond and, explicitly or implicitly, leads to the relationship between power and pre-political sources of the legitimacy. Secularization is not liberation from the religious. The fact that politics, with modernity, occupy the space of religion charges politics itself of a supplementary symbolic function. The economic theology is not a paradigm change: neither the obliteration of political theology and its replacement with a different model. The economic theology is a disguised political theology.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.issued.spa.fl_str_mv 2016-01
dc.date.accessioned.spa.fl_str_mv 2019-06-06T00:04:52Z
dc.date.available.spa.fl_str_mv 2019-06-06T00:04:52Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.spa.fl_str_mv Preterossi, G. (2016). The power and the sacred: the impossible goodbye? Between political theology and economic theology. Soft Power, 3(1), 99-107. Recuperado de https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/ojsucatolica/revistas_ucatolica/index.php/SoftP/article/view/1808/1648
dc.identifier.issn.spa.fl_str_mv 2389-8232
dc.identifier.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10983/23187
identifier_str_mv Preterossi, G. (2016). The power and the sacred: the impossible goodbye? Between political theology and economic theology. Soft Power, 3(1), 99-107. Recuperado de https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/ojsucatolica/revistas_ucatolica/index.php/SoftP/article/view/1808/1648
2389-8232
url https://hdl.handle.net/10983/23187
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Soft Power, Vol. 3, no. 1 (ene.-jun. 2016); p. 99-107
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2016
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.creativecommons.spa.fl_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2016
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Católica de Colombia. Facultad de Derecho
institution Universidad Católica de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/1e8a04e0-74d7-42dc-a1a1-5a04202b5812/download
https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/28fc1548-62a7-4a85-99f5-dbdbfeb0f823/download
https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/a8f14954-61b4-4246-826d-4263235342d3/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv e079c70bea2159ff4e5fc5852efa963d
e70c2251b5e431c83865952ae01324c4
d2861dfd4a3a92c0ba23d9ffc2665de0
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_ 1814256314678771712