The truth in a bubble the end of ‘audience democracy’ and the rise of ‘bubble democracy’.

Este artículo sostiene que el así llamado fenómeno de la “posverdad” también depende de las características del nuevo sistema de comunicación “híbrido”. La tesis es que este nuevo escenario es sustancialmente diferente a lo de la “democracia partidária”, protagonista de una parte significativa del s...

Full description

Autores:: Palano , Damiano

Tipo de recurso:: Article of journal

Fecha de publicación:: 2019

Institución:: Universidad Católica de Colombia

Repositorio:: RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica

Idioma:: eng

id	UCATOLICA2_5af15ba37a63124f7a29032cf8df50e7
oai_identifier_str	oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/29971
network_acronym_str	UCATOLICA2
network_name_str	RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	The truth in a bubble the end of ‘audience democracy’ and the rise of ‘bubble democracy’.
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv	The truth in a bubble the end of ‘audience democracy’ and the rise of ‘bubble democracy’.
title	The truth in a bubble the end of ‘audience democracy’ and the rise of ‘bubble democracy’.
spellingShingle	The truth in a bubble the end of ‘audience democracy’ and the rise of ‘bubble democracy’. Democracia de partido Democracia de audiencias Política de la posverdad Eco-cámaras Filtro de burbuja Polarización Medios de comunicación y democracia Party democracy Audience democracy Post-truth politics Echo-chambers Filter bubble Polarization Media and democracy
title_short	The truth in a bubble the end of ‘audience democracy’ and the rise of ‘bubble democracy’.
title_full	The truth in a bubble the end of ‘audience democracy’ and the rise of ‘bubble democracy’.
title_fullStr	The truth in a bubble the end of ‘audience democracy’ and the rise of ‘bubble democracy’.
title_full_unstemmed	The truth in a bubble the end of ‘audience democracy’ and the rise of ‘bubble democracy’.
title_sort	The truth in a bubble the end of ‘audience democracy’ and the rise of ‘bubble democracy’.
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Palano , Damiano
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv	Palano , Damiano
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	Democracia de partido Democracia de audiencias Política de la posverdad Eco-cámaras Filtro de burbuja Polarización Medios de comunicación y democracia
topic	Democracia de partido Democracia de audiencias Política de la posverdad Eco-cámaras Filtro de burbuja Polarización Medios de comunicación y democracia Party democracy Audience democracy Post-truth politics Echo-chambers Filter bubble Polarization Media and democracy
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv	Party democracy Audience democracy Post-truth politics Echo-chambers Filter bubble Polarization Media and democracy
description	Este artículo sostiene que el así llamado fenómeno de la “posverdad” también depende de las características del nuevo sistema de comunicación “híbrido”. La tesis es que este nuevo escenario es sustancialmente diferente a lo de la “democracia partidária”, protagonista de una parte significativa del siglo XX, y de la “democracia de audiencias”, definida por Bernard Manin a mediados de los noventa. La aparición de nuevos medios de comunicación tiene una serie de consecuencias, entre ellas la fragmentación de la audiencia en una pluralidad de segmentos auto-referenciales, “burbujas” políticamente polarizadas, desprovistas, por lo menos potencialmente, de una esfera comunicativa común. Teniendo en cuenta estos desarrollos, el artículo trata de construir el “tipo ideal” de “democracia de burbujas”, marcada por la desconfianza de las instituciones, fragmentación de la audiencia, desintermediación, tendencia a la homofilia, y la polarización.
publishDate	2019
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2019-07-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2019-07-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2019-07-01
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.eng.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.driver.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv	Journal article
dc.type.redcol.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
dc.type.version.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv	10.14718/SoftPower.2019.6.2.3
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv	2539-2239
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	2389-8232
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.14718/SoftPower.2019.6.2.3
identifier_str_mv	10.14718/SoftPower.2019.6.2.3 2539-2239 2389-8232
url	https://doi.org/10.14718/SoftPower.2019.6.2.3
dc.language.iso.eng.fl_str_mv	eng
language	eng
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv	https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/download/3561/3261
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv	Núm. 12 , Año 2019 :Julio - Diciembre
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv	53
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv	12
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv	36
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv	6
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv	Soft Power
dc.relation.references.eng.fl_str_mv	Anagnostopoulos A. et al. (2016), Viral misinformation: the role of homophily and virality, Epj Special Topics, 355-356. Bakshy E. –Messing S. –Adamic L.A. (2015), Exposure to Ideologically Diverse News and Opinion on Facebook, Science, 348, 1130-1132. Bartlett J. (2018), The People Vs Tech. How the internet is killing democracy (and how we save it). London: Ebury Press. Bessi A. et al. (2015a), Science vs. conspiracy: Collective narratives in the age of Misinformation, PLoS ONE, 10(2), retrived from: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0118093 Bessi A, et al. (2015b) Trend of Narratives in the Age of Misinformation. PLoS ONE 10(8). Retrived from: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0134641 Campbell J. (2018), Polarized. Making Sense of a Divided America. Princeton (N.Y), Princeton University Press. Dalton J. & Weldon S., (2007), Partisanship and Party System Institutionalization, Party Politics, 2, 179-196. Del Vicario M. et al. (2016), The Spreading of Misinformation Online, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 3, 554-559. Del Vicario M. et al. (2017), Mapping Social Dynamics on Facebook: The Brexit Debate, Social Network, 50, 6-16. Dick P. (1964), The Penultimate Truth. New York: Belmont Books. Dillhaut T.R., Brooks C.A., Gulati S. (2015), Detecting and Visualizing Filter Bubbles in Google and Bing, Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual Acm Conference: Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, 1851-1856. Hannak A. et al. (2013), Measuring Personalization of Web Search, Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Conference World Wide Web, New York, 527-528. Iyengar S. & Westwood S.J. (2015), Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization, American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 690-707. Iyengar S., Sood G., Lelkes Y. (2012), Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization, Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431. Jay M. (2010), The Virtues of Mendacity: On Lying in Politics. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press,. Kirchheimer O. (1966), The transformation of the West European Party Systems, in J. La Palombara & M. Weiner (Eds.), Political Parties and Political Development (177-200). Princeton (N.Y): Princeton University Press. Lorusso A.M. (2018), Postverità. Roma-Bari: Laterza. Manin B. (1997), Principles of representative government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Mounk Y. (2018), The People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom is in Danger and How to Save It, Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press. Palano D. (2017), Populismo. Milano: Bibliografica. Palano D. (2018), La maggioranza silenziosa. Chi vota la destra populista?, in C. Fumagalli & S. Puttini (Eds.), Destra (pp. 80-92), Milano: Fondazione Feltrinelli. Palano D. (2019a), The «Democratic Recession» and the Crisis of Liberalism, in A. Colombo & P. Magri (Eds.), The End of a World. The Decline of the Liberal Order (pp.37-50). Milano: Ledi. Palano D. (2019b), La fin du «public», la bubble democracy et la nouvelle polarisation, in C. Delsol & G. De Ligio (sous la direction de), La démocratie dans l’adversité. Enquête international (pp. 699-715), Paris: Cerf. Palano D. (2019c), La democrazia alla fine del pubblico. Sfiducia, frammentazione, polarizzazione: verso una bubble democracy?, Governare la paura, 35-92. Palano D., Bubble democracy. La fine del pubblico e la nuova polarizzazione, Brescia: Scholé. Pariser E. (2011), The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web Is Changing What We Read and How We Think. New York: Penguin Press. Pew Reasearch Center (12 june 2014), Political Polarization in the American Publics, retrived from https://www.people-presso.org. Pierskalla J.H. & Hollenbach F.M. (2012), Technology and Collective Action: The Effect of Coverage on Political Violence in Africa, American Political Science Review, 3, 207-224. Prior M. (2017), Post-Broadcast Democracy. How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Schkade D., Sunstein C.R., Hastie R. (2007), What Happened on Deliberation Day?, California Law Review, 3, 915-940. Sunstein C.R. (2002), The law of group polarization, The Journal of Political Philosophy, 2, 175-195. Sunstein C.R. (2017), #republic. Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton (N.Y.): Princeton University Press. Tarde G. (1901), L’opinion et la foule. Paris: Alcan.
dc.rights.eng.fl_str_mv	Damiano Palano - 2019
dc.rights.accessrights.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.eng.fl_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv	Damiano Palano - 2019 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.eng.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Soft Power
dc.source.eng.fl_str_mv	https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/3561
institution	Universidad Católica de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/2db2194c-887c-477a-a37e-1a86e20f6610/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	7a157f2d4647bfb80f999cee7069a425
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_	1814256210829901824
spelling	Palano , Damiano4ec145dc-66d7-4ea0-a469-653050c9067e3002019-07-01T00:00:00Z2019-07-01T00:00:00Z2019-07-01Este artículo sostiene que el así llamado fenómeno de la “posverdad” también depende de las características del nuevo sistema de comunicación “híbrido”. La tesis es que este nuevo escenario es sustancialmente diferente a lo de la “democracia partidária”, protagonista de una parte significativa del siglo XX, y de la “democracia de audiencias”, definida por Bernard Manin a mediados de los noventa. La aparición de nuevos medios de comunicación tiene una serie de consecuencias, entre ellas la fragmentación de la audiencia en una pluralidad de segmentos auto-referenciales, “burbujas” políticamente polarizadas, desprovistas, por lo menos potencialmente, de una esfera comunicativa común. Teniendo en cuenta estos desarrollos, el artículo trata de construir el “tipo ideal” de “democracia de burbujas”, marcada por la desconfianza de las instituciones, fragmentación de la audiencia, desintermediación, tendencia a la homofilia, y la polarización.This article sustains that the so-called ‘post-truth’ phenomenon also depends on the characteristics of the new ‘hybrid’ communicative scenario. The thesis is that this new scenario is substantially different from that of the ‘party democracy’, protagonist of significant part of the twentieth century, and from that of the ‘audience democracy’, defined by Bernard Manin in the mid-nineties. The emergence of new media entails a series of consequences, including the fragmentation of the audience into a plurality of self-referential segments, politically polarized ‘bubbles’, devoid, at least potentially, of a common communicative sphere. Taking into account such developments, the article seeks to construct the ‘ideal type’ of a ‘bubble democracy’, marked by the mistrust of institutions, fragmentation of the audience, disintermediation, homophilic tendencies, and polarization.application/pdf10.14718/SoftPower.2019.6.2.32539-22392389-8232https://doi.org/10.14718/SoftPower.2019.6.2.3engSoft Powerhttps://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/download/3561/3261Núm. 12 , Año 2019 :Julio - Diciembre5312366Soft PowerAnagnostopoulos A. et al. (2016), Viral misinformation: the role of homophily and virality, Epj Special Topics, 355-356.Bakshy E. –Messing S. –Adamic L.A. (2015), Exposure to Ideologically Diverse News and Opinion on Facebook, Science, 348, 1130-1132.Bartlett J. (2018), The People Vs Tech. How the internet is killing democracy (and how we save it). London: Ebury Press.Bessi A. et al. (2015a), Science vs. conspiracy: Collective narratives in the age of Misinformation, PLoS ONE, 10(2), retrived from: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0118093Bessi A, et al. (2015b) Trend of Narratives in the Age of Misinformation. PLoS ONE 10(8). Retrived from: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0134641Campbell J. (2018), Polarized. Making Sense of a Divided America. Princeton (N.Y), Princeton University Press.Dalton J. & Weldon S., (2007), Partisanship and Party System Institutionalization, Party Politics, 2, 179-196.Del Vicario M. et al. (2016), The Spreading of Misinformation Online, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 3, 554-559.Del Vicario M. et al. (2017), Mapping Social Dynamics on Facebook: The Brexit Debate, Social Network, 50, 6-16.Dick P. (1964), The Penultimate Truth. New York: Belmont Books.Dillhaut T.R., Brooks C.A., Gulati S. (2015), Detecting and Visualizing Filter Bubbles in Google and Bing, Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual Acm Conference: Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, 1851-1856.Hannak A. et al. (2013), Measuring Personalization of Web Search, Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Conference World Wide Web, New York, 527-528.Iyengar S. & Westwood S.J. (2015), Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization, American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 690-707.Iyengar S., Sood G., Lelkes Y. (2012), Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization, Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431. Jay M. (2010), The Virtues of Mendacity: On Lying in Politics. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press,.Kirchheimer O. (1966), The transformation of the West European Party Systems, in J. La Palombara & M. Weiner (Eds.), Political Parties and Political Development (177-200). Princeton (N.Y): Princeton University Press.Lorusso A.M. (2018), Postverità. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Manin B. (1997), Principles of representative government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Mounk Y. (2018), The People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom is in Danger and How to Save It, Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.Palano D. (2017), Populismo. Milano: Bibliografica.Palano D. (2018), La maggioranza silenziosa. Chi vota la destra populista?, in C. Fumagalli & S. Puttini (Eds.), Destra (pp. 80-92), Milano: Fondazione Feltrinelli.Palano D. (2019a), The «Democratic Recession» and the Crisis of Liberalism, in A. Colombo & P. Magri (Eds.), The End of a World. The Decline of the Liberal Order (pp.37-50). Milano: Ledi.Palano D. (2019b), La fin du «public», la bubble democracy et la nouvelle polarisation, in C. Delsol & G. De Ligio (sous la direction de), La démocratie dans l’adversité. Enquête international (pp. 699-715), Paris: Cerf.Palano D. (2019c), La democrazia alla fine del pubblico. Sfiducia, frammentazione, polarizzazione: verso una bubble democracy?, Governare la paura, 35-92.Palano D., Bubble democracy. La fine del pubblico e la nuova polarizzazione, Brescia: Scholé.Pariser E. (2011), The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web Is Changing What We Read and How We Think. New York: Penguin Press.Pew Reasearch Center (12 june 2014), Political Polarization in the American Publics, retrived from https://www.people-presso.org.Pierskalla J.H. & Hollenbach F.M. (2012), Technology and Collective Action: The Effect of Coverage on Political Violence in Africa, American Political Science Review, 3, 207-224.Prior M. (2017), Post-Broadcast Democracy. How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Schkade D., Sunstein C.R., Hastie R. (2007), What Happened on Deliberation Day?, California Law Review, 3, 915-940.Sunstein C.R. (2002), The law of group polarization, The Journal of Political Philosophy, 2, 175-195. Sunstein C.R. (2017), #republic. Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton (N.Y.): Princeton University Press.Tarde G. (1901), L’opinion et la foule. Paris: Alcan.Damiano Palano - 2019info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/3561Democracia de partidoDemocracia de audienciasPolítica de la posverdadEco-cámarasFiltro de burbujaPolarizaciónMedios de comunicación y democraciaParty democracyAudience democracyPost-truth politicsEcho-chambersFilter bubblePolarizationMedia and democracyThe truth in a bubble the end of ‘audience democracy’ and the rise of ‘bubble democracy’.The truth in a bubble the end of ‘audience democracy’ and the rise of ‘bubble democracy’.Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2538https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/2db2194c-887c-477a-a37e-1a86e20f6610/download7a157f2d4647bfb80f999cee7069a425MD5110983/29971oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/299712024-06-02 14:32:45.73https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Damiano Palano - 2019https://repository.ucatolica.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaCbdigital@metabiblioteca.com

The truth in a bubble the end of ‘audience democracy’ and the rise of ‘bubble democracy’.

Publicaciones similares