(Re)pensando el enfoque tecnológico: el caso del Centro Experimental de la Vivienda Económica (CEVE) en Argentina
The Experimental Center for Economic Housing (Centro Experimental de la Vivienda Económica, or CEVE) is a research center with over 50 years of experience in the field of popular habitat. The center has been home to technological and organizational developments, either implemented by the center itse...
- Autores:
-
Pelegrin, Gustavo
Fleker, Laila
Ferrero, Aurelio Antonio
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2019
- Institución:
- Universidad Católica de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/23087
- Acceso en línea:
- https://hdl.handle.net/10983/23087
- Palabra clave:
- DÉFICIT DE VIVIENDA
DERECHO A LA VIVIENDA
PARTICIPACIÓN CIUDADANA
POLÍTICA PÚBLICA
PRODUCCIÓN SOCIAL DEL HÁBITAT
TRANSFERENCIA DE TECNOLOGÍA
VIVIENDA ADECUADA
HOUSING DEFICIT
RIGHT TO HOUSING
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
SOCIAL PRODUCTION OF HABITAT
TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER
ADEQUATE HOUSING
DÉFICIT DE MORADIA
DIREITO À MORADIA
PARTICIPAÇÃO CIDADÃ
POLÍTICA PÚBLICA
PRODUÇÃO SOCIAL DO HÁBITAT
TRANSFERÊNCIA DE TECNOLOGIA
MORADIA ADEQUADA
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2019
Summary: | The Experimental Center for Economic Housing (Centro Experimental de la Vivienda Económica, or CEVE) is a research center with over 50 years of experience in the field of popular habitat. The center has been home to technological and organizational developments, either implemented by the center itself or transferred to other institutions and communities. As in many other occasions, the current institutional profile is in a moment of transition. Therefore, this article seeks to reflect on previous and present approaches on how to understand the issue of popular habitat and its evolution within the institutional framework, with a special focus on the scope and limitations of the technological approach in addressing housing needs given the increased complexity of the current method. This paper analyzes three recent experiences working side by side with both private and state actors, where non-technological factors played a key role to assess the performance of programs in resolving the identified needs. |
---|