Migration and theories of justice : a critical reappraisal.

Durante décadas la discusión teórica sobre la justicia ha estado buscando sin éxito soluciones convincentes a los problemas morales relacionados con la persistencia de fronteras (permeables) en la política internacional. Estos problemas son particularmente sorprendentes cuando se observa el desfase...

Full description

Autores:: Piras, Elisa

Tipo de recurso:: Article of journal

Fecha de publicación:: 2019

Institución:: Universidad Católica de Colombia

Repositorio:: RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica

Idioma:: eng

id	UCATOLICA2_557592293f54baaeaa195ffde1211ae7
oai_identifier_str	oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/29963
network_acronym_str	UCATOLICA2
network_name_str	RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	Migration and theories of justice : a critical reappraisal.
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv	Migration and theories of justice : a critical reappraisal.
title	Migration and theories of justice : a critical reappraisal.
spellingShingle	Migration and theories of justice : a critical reappraisal. Migraciones Justicia global Internacionalismo liberal Cosmopolitismo Migration Global justice Liberal internationalism Cosmopolitanism
title_short	Migration and theories of justice : a critical reappraisal.
title_full	Migration and theories of justice : a critical reappraisal.
title_fullStr	Migration and theories of justice : a critical reappraisal.
title_full_unstemmed	Migration and theories of justice : a critical reappraisal.
title_sort	Migration and theories of justice : a critical reappraisal.
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Piras, Elisa
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv	Piras, Elisa
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	Migraciones Justicia global Internacionalismo liberal Cosmopolitismo
topic	Migraciones Justicia global Internacionalismo liberal Cosmopolitismo Migration Global justice Liberal internationalism Cosmopolitanism
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv	Migration Global justice Liberal internationalism Cosmopolitanism
description	Durante décadas la discusión teórica sobre la justicia ha estado buscando sin éxito soluciones convincentes a los problemas morales relacionados con la persistencia de fronteras (permeables) en la política internacional. Estos problemas son particularmente sorprendentes cuando se observa el desfase entre las reclamaciones de derechos (legales) de los migrantes internacionales y los argumentos esgrimidos por algunos estados liberales contemporáneos para rechazar estas. Analizando de forma crítica cómo las teorías más influyentes de justicia nacional y global afrontan la cuestión de las migraciones, el ensayo destaca los principales puntos débiles de los dos enfoques. Se expone que mientras que las teorías que se concentran en la justicia nacional no parecen ser capaces de trascender la dicotomía lógica inclusión/ exclusión a causa de su interpretación parcial y sesgada del fenómeno de las migraciones, las teorías de justicia global ofrecen una lectura multidimensional y equilibrada de las migraciones internacionales, pero no consiguen proponer soluciones basadas en una lectura adecuada del impacto de las dinámicas de la política global en la gestión local de los migrantes. Para superar las debilidades de las dos visiones es necesario un nuevo programa de investigación.
publishDate	2019
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2019-01-01
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.eng.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.driver.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv	Journal article
dc.type.redcol.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
dc.type.version.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv	10.14718/SoftPower.2019.6.1.16
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv	2539-2239
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	2389-8232
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.14718/SoftPower.2019.6.1.16
identifier_str_mv	10.14718/SoftPower.2019.6.1.16 2539-2239 2389-8232
url	https://doi.org/10.14718/SoftPower.2019.6.1.16
dc.language.iso.eng.fl_str_mv	eng
language	eng
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv	https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/download/3534/3252
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv	Núm. 11 , Año 2019 :Enero - Junio
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv	361
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv	11
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv	336
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv	6
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv	Soft Power
dc.relation.references.eng.fl_str_mv	Abizadeh, A. (2008). Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders. Political Theory, 36(1), 37-65. Baccelli, L. (2009). I diritti dei popoli. Universalismo e differenze culturali. Roma – Bari: Laterza. Bader, V. (2005). The Ethics of Immigration. Constellations, 12(3). Barry, B. (1991). Theories of Justice. Treatise on Social Justice, Volume I. Berkeley – Los Angeles: University of California Press. Barry, B. (1999). International Society from a Cosmopolitan Perspective. In D. Mapel & T. Nardin (Eds.), International Society. Diverse Ethical Perspectives (pp. 144-161). Princeton: Princeton University Press,. Bauböck, R. (2009). The rights and duties of external citizenship. Citizenship Studies, 3(5), 475-499. Beitz, C. (1979). Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Benhabib, S. (1999). Citizens, Residents, and Aliens in a Changing World: Political Membership in the Global Era. Social Research, 66(3),. 709-744. Benhabib, S. (2004). The Law of Peoples, Distributive Justice, and Migrations. Fordham Law Review, 72(5), 1761-1787. Blake, M. & Risse, M. (2009). Immigration and Original Ownership of the Earth. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy, 23(1), 133-165. Blake, M. (2013). Immigration, Jurisdiction and Exclusion. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 41(2), 103-130. Bocchiola, M. (2013). La posizione originaria tra contratto e costruzione. Biblioteca della libertà, 48(206-207), 83-96. Brock, G. & Blake, M., eds (2015). Debating brain drain: may governments restrict emigration? Oxford – New York: Oxford University Press. Brock, G. (2013). Contemporary Cosmopolitanism: Some Current Issues. Philosophy Compass, 8(8), 689-698. Cabrera, L. (2008). Global Citizenship as the Completion of Cosmopolitanism. Journal of International Political Theory, 4(1), 84-104. Campbell, T. (2010, or. ed. 1988). Justice. Basingstoke – New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Carens, J. (1987). Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders. The Review of Politics, 49(2), 251-273. Carens, J. (2000). Culture, Citizenship, and Community. A Contextual Exploration of Justice as Evenhandedness. Oxford – New York: Oxford University Press. Carens, J. (2013). The Ethics of Immigration. Oxford – New York: Oxford University Press. Cole, P. (2014). Beyond reason: the philosophy and politics of immigration. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 17(5), 503-520. Corigliano, F. (2018). Spazi Globali. Soglie contemporanee della politica. Udine: Mimesis. Corti, P. (2011, or. ed. 2003). Storia delle migrazioni internazionali. Roma – Bari: Laterza. De Pascale, C. (2010). Giustizia. Bologna: Il Mulino. De Schutter, H. & Ypi, L. (2015). Mandatory Citizenship for Immigrants. The British Academy Brian Barry Prize Essay. British Journal of Political Science, 45(2), 235-251. Di Cesare, D. (2017). Stranieri residenti. Una filosofia della migrazione. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri. Faist, T. (2013). The mobility turn: a new paradigm for the social sciences? Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(11) 1637-1646. Forst, R. (2011). The Right to Justification. Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice. New York: Columbia University Press. Fraser, N. & Honneth, A. (2004). Redistribution or Recognition?: A Political-Philosophical Exchange. London: Verso Books. Galli, C. (2001). Spazi politici. L’età moderna e l’età globale. Bologna: Il Mulino. Greblo, E. (2015). Etica dell’immigrazione. Udine: Mimesis. Gundognu, A. (2015). Rightlessness in an Age of Rights: Hannah Arendt and the Contemporary Struggles of Migrants. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Henry, B. Pirni, A. (2006). La via identitaria al multiculturalismo. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino. Jahn, B. (2013). Liberal Internationalism: Theory, History, Practice. Basingstoke – New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Jubb, R. (2012). Tragedies of non-ideal theory. European Journal of Political Theory, 11(3), 229-246. Karim, K.H. (2006). Nation and diaspora: Rethinking multiculturalism in a transnational context. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics, 2(3), 267-282. King, N. (2016). No Borders: the Politics of Immigration Control and Resistance. London: Zed Books. Kollar, E. (2016). Symposium on Brain Drain: The Merits and Limits of Furthering Normative Solutions in Source Countries. Moral Philosophy and Politics, 3(1), 1-5. Kovner, N. (2017). Migration in a warming world: on the responsibility and obligations of states towards climate change immigrants (PhD thesis). London: London School of Economics and Political Science. Kukathas, C. (2017). On David Miller on immigration control. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 20(6), 712-718. Kymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural citizenship: A liberal theory of minority rights. Oxford – New York: Oxford University Press. Kymlicka, W. (2001). Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism, and Citizenship. Oxford – New York: Oxford University Press. Kymlicka, W. (2007). Multicultural Odysseys. Navigating the New International Politics of Diversity. Oxford – New York: Oxford University Press. Lanzillo, M.L. (2005). Multiculturalismo. Roma – Bari: Laterza. Loretoni, A. (2014). Ampliare lo sguardo. Genere e teoria politica. Roma: Donzelli. Macedo, S. (2004). What Self-Governing Peoples Owe to One Another: Universalism, Diversity and the Law of Peoples. Fordham Law Review, 72(5), 1721-1738. Manning, P. (2013). Migration in World History. Abingdon – New York: Routledge. Margalit, A. & Halbertal, M. (1994). Liberalism and the Right to Culture. Social Research, 61(3), 491-510. Mason, A. (2010). Rawlsian Theory and the Circumstances of Politics. Political Theory, 38(5), 658-683. Mavroudi, E. & Nagel, C. (2016). Global Migration. Patterns, Processes and Politics. Abingdon – New York: Routledge. Mazzone, L. (2014). Una teoria negativa della giustizia. Per un’etica del conflitto contro i mali comuni. Udine: Mimesis. Mazzone, L. (2017). Riconoscimento, partecipazione, giustificazione o critica interna? Verso una quarta via politico-filosofica. Filosofia Politica, 31(2), 285-304. Mendoza, J.J. (2017). The moral and political philosophy of immigration: Liberty, security, and equality. London: Lexington Books. Miller, D. (1997). On Nationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Miller, D. (2008). Immigrants, Nations and Citizenship. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 16(4), 371-390. Miller, D. (2015). Justice in Immigration. European Journal of Political Theory, 14(4), 391-408. Miller, D. (2016). Strangers in Our Midst. The Political Philosophy of Immigration. Cambridge (MA) – London: Harvard University Press. Mitnick, E.J. (2006). Rights, Groups, and Self-Invention. Group-Differentiated Rights in Liberal Theory. Farnham – Burlington: Ashgate. Moore, M. (2016). Justice and Colonialism. Philosophy Compass, 11(8), 447-461. Nida-Rümelin, J. (2018, or. ed. 2017). Pensare oltre i confini. Un’etica della migrazione. Milano: FrancoAngeli. Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books. O’ Neill, O. (1996). Towards Justice and Virtue: A Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Oberman, K. (2016). Immigration as a Human Right. In S. Fine & L. Ypi (Eds.), Migration in Political Theory. The Ethics of Movement and Membership (pp. 32-56). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ottonelli, V. & Torresi, T. (2012). Inclusivist Egalitarian Liberalism and Temporary Migration: A Dilemma. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 20(2), 202-224. Parekh, S. (2017). Refugees and the Ethics of Forced Displacement. New York: Routledge. Pellegrino, G. (2018). L’isola che non c’è (più). I rifugiati ambientali e il diritto di residenza. La società degli individui, 21(61), 59-73. Pievani, T. (2002). Homo Sapiens e altre catastrofi. Per una archeologia della globalizzazione. Milano: Meltemi Pogge, T. & Moellendorf, D. (Eds.) (2008, or. ed. 2001). Global Justice: Seminal Essays. St Paul: Paragon. Pogge, T. (1989). Realizing Rawls. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Pongiglione, F. & Sala, R. (2018). Migranti climatici. Una nuova categoria di migranti? La società degli individui, 21(61), 74-88. Porter, T. (2012). Rawls, Reasonableness, and International Toleration. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 11(4), 382-414. Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Ma.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Rawls, J. (1993). Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press. Rawls, J. (1993b) The Law of Peoples. In S. Shute & S. Hurley (Eds.), On Human Rights: The Oxford Amnesty Lectures. New York: Basic Books. Rawls, J. (1999). The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, Ma: Harvard University Press. Ronzoni, M. (2009). The Global Order: A Case of Background Injustice? A Practice-Dependent Account. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 37(3), 229-256. Sager, A. (2014). Reframing the Brain Drain. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 17(5), 560-579. Sager, A. (2016). Methodological Nationalism, Migration and Political Theory. Political Studies, 64(1), 42-59. Sager, A. (2018). Toward a Cosmopolitan Ethics of Mobility. The Migrant’s-Eye View of the World. Basingstoke – New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Sanfilippo, M. (2009). Migrazioni e comunità: le riflessioni di Charles Taylor e Will Kymlicka. Studi Emigrazione/Migration Studies, 46(173), 3-17. Santi Amantini, L. (2018). Diritto di migrare, diritto di restare. Filosofia politica, migrazione volontaria e forzata. La società degli individui, 21(61), 9-18. Scheffler, S. (2007). Immigration and the Significance of Culture. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 35(2), 93-125. Shachar, A. (2016). Selecting by Merit. The Brave New World of Stratified Mobility. In S. Fine & L. Ypi (Eds.), Migration and Political Theory: The Ethics of Movement and Membership (pp. 175-204). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Song, S. (2018). Immigration and Democracy. Oxford – New York: Oxford University Press. Straehle, C. (2016). Justified state partiality and the vulnerable subject in migration. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 20(6), 297-312. Taylor, C. (1992). The Politics of Recognition. In A. Gutman (Ed.), Multiculturalism. Examining the Politics of Recognition. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Taylor, C. (1994). Reconciling the Solitudes: Essays on Canadian Federalism and Nationalism. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press. Valentini, L. (2012). Ideal vs. Non‐ideal Theory: A Conceptual Map. Philosophy Compass, 7(9), 654-664. Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6),1024-1054. Vertovec, S. (2009). Transnationalism. Abingdon – New York: Routledge. Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of Justice. A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books. Wellman, C.H. (2008). Immigration and Freedom of Association. Ethics, 119(1), 109-141. Yong, C. (2018). Justifying Resistance to Immigration Law: The Case of Mere Noncompliance. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 31(2), 459-481. Young, I.M. (2011). Responsibility for Justice. Oxford – New York: Oxford University Press. Ypi, L. (2008). Justice in Migration: A Closed Borders Utopia? The Journal of Political Philosophy, 16(4), 391-418. Ypi, L., (2012). Global Justice and Avant-Garde Political Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ypi, L. (2016). Who is exploited? The moral dilemmas of guestwork programmes. In S. Fine & L. Ypi (Eds.), Migration in Political Theory (pp. 151-174). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ypi, L. (2018). Borders of Class: Migration and Citizenship in the Capitalist State. Ethics and International Affairs, 32(2), 141-152. Žižek, S. (2017). Against the Double Blackmail. Refugees, Terror and Other Troubles with Neighbours. London: Penguin.
dc.rights.eng.fl_str_mv	Elisa Piras - 2019
dc.rights.accessrights.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.eng.fl_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv	Elisa Piras - 2019 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.eng.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Soft Power
dc.source.eng.fl_str_mv	https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/3534
institution	Universidad Católica de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/cbd3e05f-f692-44b7-8bb4-c767b3c1b7a5/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	58816ee8fbaddb994e00e44680cf7fc4
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_	1814256242715000832
spelling	Piras, Elisa4fe1a825-6770-46e1-ad4b-747682f1ce842019-01-01T00:00:00Z2019-01-01T00:00:00Z2019-01-01Durante décadas la discusión teórica sobre la justicia ha estado buscando sin éxito soluciones convincentes a los problemas morales relacionados con la persistencia de fronteras (permeables) en la política internacional. Estos problemas son particularmente sorprendentes cuando se observa el desfase entre las reclamaciones de derechos (legales) de los migrantes internacionales y los argumentos esgrimidos por algunos estados liberales contemporáneos para rechazar estas. Analizando de forma crítica cómo las teorías más influyentes de justicia nacional y global afrontan la cuestión de las migraciones, el ensayo destaca los principales puntos débiles de los dos enfoques. Se expone que mientras que las teorías que se concentran en la justicia nacional no parecen ser capaces de trascender la dicotomía lógica inclusión/ exclusión a causa de su interpretación parcial y sesgada del fenómeno de las migraciones, las teorías de justicia global ofrecen una lectura multidimensional y equilibrada de las migraciones internacionales, pero no consiguen proponer soluciones basadas en una lectura adecuada del impacto de las dinámicas de la política global en la gestión local de los migrantes. Para superar las debilidades de las dos visiones es necesario un nuevo programa de investigación.For decades, the theoretical discussion on justice has been unsuccessfully looking for convincing solutions to the moral problems connected to the persistence of (porous) borders in international politics. These problems are especially striking when one looks at the mismatch between the claims of international migrants and the arguments deployed by several contemporary liberal states in order to justify the rejection of those claims. Critically analysing how the most influential accounts of domestic and global justice deal with the issue of migration, the essay reveals the main weaknesses of the two approaches. It is argued that while theories of justice focusing on domestic justice seem unable to transcend the dichotomous logic of inclusion and exclusion because of their partial and biased interpretation of the phenomenon of migration, theories of global justice offer a multidimensional and well-balanced reading of international migration, but the solutions they propose do not rely on an accurate reading of the impact of global political dynamics on the management of international migration. In order to overcome the weaknesses of both approaches, a new research agenda is needed.application/pdf10.14718/SoftPower.2019.6.1.162539-22392389-8232https://doi.org/10.14718/SoftPower.2019.6.1.16engSoft Powerhttps://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/download/3534/3252Núm. 11 , Año 2019 :Enero - Junio361113366Soft PowerAbizadeh, A. (2008). Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders. Political Theory, 36(1), 37-65.Baccelli, L. (2009). I diritti dei popoli. Universalismo e differenze culturali. Roma – Bari: Laterza.Bader, V. (2005). The Ethics of Immigration. Constellations, 12(3).Barry, B. (1991). Theories of Justice. Treatise on Social Justice, Volume I. Berkeley – Los Angeles: University of California Press.Barry, B. (1999). International Society from a Cosmopolitan Perspective. In D. Mapel & T. Nardin (Eds.), International Society. Diverse Ethical Perspectives (pp. 144-161). Princeton: Princeton University Press,.Bauböck, R. (2009). The rights and duties of external citizenship. Citizenship Studies, 3(5), 475-499.Beitz, C. (1979). Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Benhabib, S. (1999). Citizens, Residents, and Aliens in a Changing World: Political Membership in the Global Era. Social Research, 66(3),. 709-744.Benhabib, S. (2004). The Law of Peoples, Distributive Justice, and Migrations. Fordham Law Review, 72(5), 1761-1787.Blake, M. & Risse, M. (2009). Immigration and Original Ownership of the Earth. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy, 23(1), 133-165.Blake, M. (2013). Immigration, Jurisdiction and Exclusion. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 41(2), 103-130.Bocchiola, M. (2013). La posizione originaria tra contratto e costruzione. Biblioteca della libertà, 48(206-207), 83-96.Brock, G. & Blake, M., eds (2015). Debating brain drain: may governments restrict emigration? Oxford – New York: Oxford University Press.Brock, G. (2013). Contemporary Cosmopolitanism: Some Current Issues. Philosophy Compass, 8(8), 689-698.Cabrera, L. (2008). Global Citizenship as the Completion of Cosmopolitanism. Journal of International Political Theory, 4(1), 84-104.Campbell, T. (2010, or. ed. 1988). Justice. Basingstoke – New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Carens, J. (1987). Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders. The Review of Politics, 49(2), 251-273.Carens, J. (2000). Culture, Citizenship, and Community. A Contextual Exploration of Justice as Evenhandedness. Oxford – New York: Oxford University Press.Carens, J. (2013). The Ethics of Immigration. Oxford – New York: Oxford University Press.Cole, P. (2014). Beyond reason: the philosophy and politics of immigration. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 17(5), 503-520.Corigliano, F. (2018). Spazi Globali. Soglie contemporanee della politica. Udine: Mimesis.Corti, P. (2011, or. ed. 2003). Storia delle migrazioni internazionali. Roma – Bari: Laterza.De Pascale, C. (2010). Giustizia. Bologna: Il Mulino.De Schutter, H. & Ypi, L. (2015). Mandatory Citizenship for Immigrants. The British Academy Brian Barry Prize Essay. British Journal of Political Science, 45(2), 235-251.Di Cesare, D. (2017). Stranieri residenti. Una filosofia della migrazione. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.Faist, T. (2013). The mobility turn: a new paradigm for the social sciences? Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(11) 1637-1646.Forst, R. (2011). The Right to Justification. Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice. New York: Columbia University Press.Fraser, N. & Honneth, A. (2004). Redistribution or Recognition?: A Political-Philosophical Exchange. London: Verso Books.Galli, C. (2001). Spazi politici. L’età moderna e l’età globale. Bologna: Il Mulino.Greblo, E. (2015). Etica dell’immigrazione. Udine: Mimesis.Gundognu, A. (2015). Rightlessness in an Age of Rights: Hannah Arendt and the Contemporary Struggles of Migrants. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Henry, B. Pirni, A. (2006). La via identitaria al multiculturalismo. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.Jahn, B. (2013). Liberal Internationalism: Theory, History, Practice. Basingstoke – New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Jubb, R. (2012). Tragedies of non-ideal theory. European Journal of Political Theory, 11(3), 229-246.Karim, K.H. (2006). Nation and diaspora: Rethinking multiculturalism in a transnational context. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics, 2(3), 267-282.King, N. (2016). No Borders: the Politics of Immigration Control and Resistance. London: Zed Books.Kollar, E. (2016). Symposium on Brain Drain: The Merits and Limits of Furthering Normative Solutions in Source Countries. Moral Philosophy and Politics, 3(1), 1-5.Kovner, N. (2017). Migration in a warming world: on the responsibility and obligations of states towards climate change immigrants (PhD thesis). London: London School of Economics and Political Science.Kukathas, C. (2017). On David Miller on immigration control. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 20(6), 712-718.Kymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural citizenship: A liberal theory of minority rights. Oxford – New York: Oxford University Press.Kymlicka, W. (2001). Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism, and Citizenship. Oxford – New York: Oxford University Press.Kymlicka, W. (2007). Multicultural Odysseys. Navigating the New International Politics of Diversity. Oxford – New York: Oxford University Press.Lanzillo, M.L. (2005). Multiculturalismo. Roma – Bari: Laterza.Loretoni, A. (2014). Ampliare lo sguardo. Genere e teoria politica. Roma: Donzelli.Macedo, S. (2004). What Self-Governing Peoples Owe to One Another: Universalism, Diversity and the Law of Peoples. Fordham Law Review, 72(5), 1721-1738.Manning, P. (2013). Migration in World History. Abingdon – New York: Routledge.Margalit, A. & Halbertal, M. (1994). Liberalism and the Right to Culture. Social Research, 61(3), 491-510.Mason, A. (2010). Rawlsian Theory and the Circumstances of Politics. Political Theory, 38(5), 658-683.Mavroudi, E. & Nagel, C. (2016). Global Migration. Patterns, Processes and Politics. Abingdon – New York: Routledge.Mazzone, L. (2014). Una teoria negativa della giustizia. Per un’etica del conflitto contro i mali comuni. Udine: Mimesis.Mazzone, L. (2017). Riconoscimento, partecipazione, giustificazione o critica interna? Verso una quarta via politico-filosofica. Filosofia Politica, 31(2), 285-304.Mendoza, J.J. (2017). The moral and political philosophy of immigration: Liberty, security, and equality. London: Lexington Books.Miller, D. (1997). On Nationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Miller, D. (2008). Immigrants, Nations and Citizenship. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 16(4), 371-390.Miller, D. (2015). Justice in Immigration. European Journal of Political Theory, 14(4), 391-408.Miller, D. (2016). Strangers in Our Midst. The Political Philosophy of Immigration. Cambridge (MA) – London: Harvard University Press.Mitnick, E.J. (2006). Rights, Groups, and Self-Invention. Group-Differentiated Rights in Liberal Theory. Farnham – Burlington: Ashgate.Moore, M. (2016). Justice and Colonialism. Philosophy Compass, 11(8), 447-461.Nida-Rümelin, J. (2018, or. ed. 2017). Pensare oltre i confini. Un’etica della migrazione. Milano: FrancoAngeli.Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.O’ Neill, O. (1996). Towards Justice and Virtue: A Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Oberman, K. (2016). Immigration as a Human Right. In S. Fine & L. Ypi (Eds.), Migration in Political Theory. The Ethics of Movement and Membership (pp. 32-56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Ottonelli, V. & Torresi, T. (2012). Inclusivist Egalitarian Liberalism and Temporary Migration: A Dilemma. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 20(2), 202-224.Parekh, S. (2017). Refugees and the Ethics of Forced Displacement. New York: Routledge.Pellegrino, G. (2018). L’isola che non c’è (più). I rifugiati ambientali e il diritto di residenza. La società degli individui, 21(61), 59-73.Pievani, T. (2002). Homo Sapiens e altre catastrofi. Per una archeologia della globalizzazione. Milano: MeltemiPogge, T. & Moellendorf, D. (Eds.) (2008, or. ed. 2001). Global Justice: Seminal Essays. St Paul: Paragon.Pogge, T. (1989). Realizing Rawls. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Pongiglione, F. & Sala, R. (2018). Migranti climatici. Una nuova categoria di migranti? La società degli individui, 21(61), 74-88.Porter, T. (2012). Rawls, Reasonableness, and International Toleration. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 11(4), 382-414.Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Ma.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Rawls, J. (1993). Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Rawls, J. (1993b) The Law of Peoples. In S. Shute & S. Hurley (Eds.), On Human Rights: The Oxford Amnesty Lectures. New York: Basic Books.Rawls, J. (1999). The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, Ma: Harvard University Press.Ronzoni, M. (2009). The Global Order: A Case of Background Injustice? A Practice-Dependent Account. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 37(3), 229-256.Sager, A. (2014). Reframing the Brain Drain. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 17(5), 560-579.Sager, A. (2016). Methodological Nationalism, Migration and Political Theory. Political Studies, 64(1), 42-59.Sager, A. (2018). Toward a Cosmopolitan Ethics of Mobility. The Migrant’s-Eye View of the World. Basingstoke – New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Sanfilippo, M. (2009). Migrazioni e comunità: le riflessioni di Charles Taylor e Will Kymlicka. Studi Emigrazione/Migration Studies, 46(173), 3-17.Santi Amantini, L. (2018). Diritto di migrare, diritto di restare. Filosofia politica, migrazione volontaria e forzata. La società degli individui, 21(61), 9-18.Scheffler, S. (2007). Immigration and the Significance of Culture. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 35(2), 93-125.Shachar, A. (2016). Selecting by Merit. The Brave New World of Stratified Mobility. In S. Fine & L. Ypi (Eds.), Migration and Political Theory: The Ethics of Movement and Membership (pp. 175-204). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Song, S. (2018). Immigration and Democracy. Oxford – New York: Oxford University Press.Straehle, C. (2016). Justified state partiality and the vulnerable subject in migration. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 20(6), 297-312.Taylor, C. (1992). The Politics of Recognition. In A. Gutman (Ed.), Multiculturalism. Examining the Politics of Recognition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Taylor, C. (1994). Reconciling the Solitudes: Essays on Canadian Federalism and Nationalism. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Valentini, L. (2012). Ideal vs. Non‐ideal Theory: A Conceptual Map. Philosophy Compass, 7(9), 654-664.Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6),1024-1054.Vertovec, S. (2009). Transnationalism. Abingdon – New York: Routledge.Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of Justice. A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books.Wellman, C.H. (2008). Immigration and Freedom of Association. Ethics, 119(1), 109-141.Yong, C. (2018). Justifying Resistance to Immigration Law: The Case of Mere Noncompliance. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 31(2), 459-481.Young, I.M. (2011). Responsibility for Justice. Oxford – New York: Oxford University Press. Ypi, L. (2008). Justice in Migration: A Closed Borders Utopia? The Journal of Political Philosophy, 16(4), 391-418.Ypi, L., (2012). Global Justice and Avant-Garde Political Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Ypi, L. (2016). Who is exploited? The moral dilemmas of guestwork programmes. In S. Fine & L. Ypi (Eds.), Migration in Political Theory (pp. 151-174). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Ypi, L. (2018). Borders of Class: Migration and Citizenship in the Capitalist State. Ethics and International Affairs, 32(2), 141-152.Žižek, S. (2017). Against the Double Blackmail. Refugees, Terror and Other Troubles with Neighbours. London: Penguin.Elisa Piras - 2019info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/3534MigracionesJusticia globalInternacionalismo liberalCosmopolitismoMigrationGlobal justiceLiberal internationalismCosmopolitanismMigration and theories of justice : a critical reappraisal.Migration and theories of justice : a critical reappraisal.Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2458https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/cbd3e05f-f692-44b7-8bb4-c767b3c1b7a5/download58816ee8fbaddb994e00e44680cf7fc4MD5110983/29963oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/299632024-06-02 14:32:38.346https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Elisa Piras - 2019https://repository.ucatolica.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaCbdigital@metabiblioteca.com

Migration and theories of justice : a critical reappraisal.

Publicaciones similares