Kant, el primer sistematizador para el derecho penal
Social processes have been warned of punishment in all models or human organizations that anthropology has described. However, it does not follow that, based on systems theory, has always existed a criminal systemic structure that accounts for the punitive function of the state. Although the incursi...
- Autores:
-
Moya-Vargas, Manuel Fernando
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2010
- Institución:
- Universidad Católica de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/16900
- Acceso en línea:
- https://hdl.handle.net/10983/16900
- Palabra clave:
- CASTIGO SOCIAL
TEORÍA
ESTRUCTURA
KANT
HEGEL
HISTORIA DEL DERECHO PENAL
LUHMAN
METAFÍSICA DE LAS COSTUMBRES
RESPONSABILIDAD
SOCIAL PUNISHMENT
LAW
STRUCTURE
HISTORY OF CRIMINAL LAW
METAPHYSICS OF MORALS
CRIMINAL LIABILITY
THEORY
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2010
| Summary: | Social processes have been warned of punishment in all models or human organizations that anthropology has described. However, it does not follow that, based on systems theory, has always existed a criminal systemic structure that accounts for the punitive function of the state. Although the incursions discursive history reveals, as the work of Beccaria, who first made a legal systematization includes appropriate for this discourse of criminal law, it was precisely Kant's Metaphysics of Morals. The work itself is a proposed system of law in general, which proposes a global taxonomy with in which the penalty factor is part of public law. From there it operates the subjective bases of criminal law, that is, one whose foundations reveal the guilt as a basis of liability. |
|---|