Funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems: una revisión conceptual y metodológica
Today, identifying biased item tests is an inevitable task in the process of construction and validation of psychological tests. Thus, it is important to understand the concepts related to Differential Items Functioning (DIF) and the methods for its detection. This paper re¬views the basic concepts...
- Autores:
-
Herrera-Rojas, Aura Nidia
Sánchez-Pedraza, Ricardo
Gómez-Benito, Juana
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2001
- Institución:
- Universidad Católica de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/22764
- Acceso en línea:
- https://hdl.handle.net/10983/22764
- Palabra clave:
- DIF
ITEM DE BIAS
PRUEBA DE BIAS
DIF
BIAS ITEM
BIAS TEST
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2001
| id |
UCATOLICA2_3e70895218128cd7ef9747e51ea9b40f |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/22764 |
| network_acronym_str |
UCATOLICA2 |
| network_name_str |
RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems: una revisión conceptual y metodológica |
| title |
Funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems: una revisión conceptual y metodológica |
| spellingShingle |
Funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems: una revisión conceptual y metodológica DIF ITEM DE BIAS PRUEBA DE BIAS DIF BIAS ITEM BIAS TEST |
| title_short |
Funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems: una revisión conceptual y metodológica |
| title_full |
Funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems: una revisión conceptual y metodológica |
| title_fullStr |
Funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems: una revisión conceptual y metodológica |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems: una revisión conceptual y metodológica |
| title_sort |
Funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems: una revisión conceptual y metodológica |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Herrera-Rojas, Aura Nidia Sánchez-Pedraza, Ricardo Gómez-Benito, Juana |
| dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv |
Herrera-Rojas, Aura Nidia Sánchez-Pedraza, Ricardo Gómez-Benito, Juana |
| dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv |
DIF ITEM DE BIAS PRUEBA DE BIAS DIF BIAS ITEM BIAS TEST |
| topic |
DIF ITEM DE BIAS PRUEBA DE BIAS DIF BIAS ITEM BIAS TEST |
| description |
Today, identifying biased item tests is an inevitable task in the process of construction and validation of psychological tests. Thus, it is important to understand the concepts related to Differential Items Functioning (DIF) and the methods for its detection. This paper re¬views the basic concepts related to DIF within the context of tests construct validity. In addition, some important methods, commonly used for DIF detection, are described em¬phasizing the advantages and limitations for its practical use. |
| publishDate |
2001 |
| dc.date.issued.spa.fl_str_mv |
2001-07 |
| dc.date.accessioned.spa.fl_str_mv |
2019-02-19T15:29:06Z |
| dc.date.available.spa.fl_str_mv |
2019-02-19T15:29:06Z |
| dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de revista |
| dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
| dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv |
Text |
| dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART |
| dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.citation.spa.fl_str_mv |
Herrera-Rojas, A., Sánchez-Pedraza, R., & Gómez-Benito, J. (2001). Funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems: una revisión conceptual y metodológica. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 0(5), 41-61. Recuperado de https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/ojsucatolica/revistas_ucatolica/index.php/acta-colombiana-psicologia/article/view/589 |
| dc.identifier.issn.spa.fl_str_mv |
0123-9155 |
| dc.identifier.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/10983/22764 |
| identifier_str_mv |
Herrera-Rojas, A., Sánchez-Pedraza, R., & Gómez-Benito, J. (2001). Funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems: una revisión conceptual y metodológica. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 0(5), 41-61. Recuperado de https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/ojsucatolica/revistas_ucatolica/index.php/acta-colombiana-psicologia/article/view/589 0123-9155 |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10983/22764 |
| dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv |
Acta Colombiana de Psicología, No. 5 (jul. 2001); p. 41-61 |
| dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv |
Anastasi (1974) Test Psicológicos (3ra ed.).. Madrid: Aguilar. Anastasi, A. y Urbina, S (1998). Test Psicológicos. (7a ed.) México: Prentice Hall. Angoff W.H. (1982). Use of difficulty and discrimination indices dor detecting item bias. En RA Berk (Ed), Handbook of Methods for Detecting Test Bias. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.. Angoff W. H. (1993). Perspectives on Differential Item Functioning Methodology. En P. W. Holland y H. Wainer (Eds), Differential Item Functioning. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Baker, F. B. (1981). A criticism of Sheuneman’s item bias technique. Journal of Educational Measurement, 18, 59-62. Binet, A. y Simon, T. (1916). The development of intelligence in children. New York: Arno. Bond, L. (1987). The Golden Rule settlement: A minority perspective. Educational Measurement: Isuues and Practice. 6, 18-20. Camilli, G. y Shepard, L. (1994). Methods for identiting biased test items. London: SAGE Publications. Christensen R. (1997). Log-Linear Models and Logistic regression. 2nd ed. 'New York: Springer. Cole, N. (1993). History and Development of DIF. En P. W. Holland y H. Wainer (Eds), Diferential Item Functioning. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Dorans, N. J. y Holland, P. W. 1993. DIF Detection and Description: Mantel-Haenszel and Standarization. En P. W. Holland y H. Wainer (Eds), Diferential Item Functioning. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Eelles, K. Havighurst, R. J., Herrick, V. E. y Tyler, R. W. (1951). Intelligence and cultural dijferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Faggen, J (1987) Golden Rule revisited: Introduction. Educational Measurement: Isuues and Practice. 6, 5-8. Ferreres, D. (1998). Funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems de una prueba de aptitud intelectual en función de la lengua familiar y la lengua de escolarización. Valencia: Universitat de Valencia. Tesis doctoral inédita. Fidalgo, AM. (1996). Funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems. En J. Muñiz (Coord.) Psicometría. Madrid: Editorial Universitas, S.A. Gómez, J., c Hidalgo, M. D. (1997). Evaluación del funcionamiento diferencial en ítems dicótomos: una revisión metodológica. Anuario de Psicología. 74, 3-32. Hambleton, R. K., Clauser, B. E., Mazor, K. M. y Jones, R. W. (1993). Advances in the detection of Differentially functioning test items. Journal of Psychological Assessment, 9(1), 1-18. Holland, P. W. y Thayer, D. T. (1988). Differential item performance and Mantel-Haenszel procedure. En H. Wainer y H.I. Braun (Eds) Test Validity. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum. Holland, P. W. y Wainer, H. (1993). Preface En P. W. Holland y H. Wainer (Eds), Dijferential Item Functioning. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Ironson GH. (1982). Use of chi-square and latente trait approaches for detecting item bias. En RA Berk (Ed). Handbook of Methods for Detecting Test Bias. Baltmore: John Hopkins University Press. Jensen, A. R. (1969). How much can we boast IQ and scholastic achievement?. Harvard Educational Review, 39, 1-123. Kahn H.A., Sempos CT. (1989). Statistical methods in Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press. Kleinbaum D.G. (1994). Logistic regression. A selfleaming text. New York: Springer. Lim, R. G. y Drasgow, F. (1987). Implications of the Golden Rule settlement for test construction. Educational Measurement: Isuues and Practice, 6, 13-17. Lim, R. G. y Drasgow, F. (1990). Evaluation of Two methods for estimating Item Response Theory parameters when assessing differential item functioning. Journal oprplied Psychology. 75(2), 164-174. Linn R, L., Hamisch D.L. (1981) Interactions between item content and group membership on achievement test items. Journal of Educational Measurement ; 18: 109-118. Linn, R. L. Levine, M. V. Hastings, G. N. y Wardrop, J. L. (1981) An investigation of item bias in a test on reading comprehension. Applied Psychological Measurement. 5, 159-173. Lord, F. M. (1980). Aplications of Item Response Theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale: LEA. Mantel, N. y Haenszel, W. (1959). Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. Journal of The National Cancer Institute, 22, 719-748. Mellenbergh. G. (1982). Contingency table models for assesing item bias. Journal of Educational Statistics. 7, 105-118. Millsap. R. E. y Everson, H. T. (1993). Methodology review: Statistical approaches for assessing measurement bias. Applied Psychological Measurement. 17, 297-334. Muñiz. J. (1997) Introducción a la teoría de respuesta al Ítem. Madrid: Ediciones Pirámide. Muniz. J. (1998) Teoría clásica de los test. Madrid: Ediciones Pirámide. Powers, D. A. y Xie, Y. (2000). Statistical Methads for catagorical Data Analysis. San Diego: Academic Press. Prieto Marañón, P.; Barbero García, M. I. y San Luis Costas, C. (1997). Identification of nonuniform differential item functioning: A comparison of Mantel-Haenszel and Item Response Theory analysis procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57 (4) 559-568. Raju, N. S. (1990). Determining the significance of estimated signed dnd unsigned areas between two item response function. Applied Psychological Measurement. 14, 197-207. Reynolds, C. R. (1982). Methods for detecting construct and predictive bias. En R. A. Berk, (Ed). Handbook of methods for detecting test bias. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkuns University Press. Rosner B. (1995) Fundamentals of Biostatistics. (4a ed). Belmont: Duxbury Press. Rudner. L.M.. Getson, P.R. y Knight, BL. (1980). A Monte Carlo comparison of seven biased item detection techniques. Journal o Educational Measurement, 17(1), 1-10. Schcuneman JD. (1979). A new method for assesing bias in test items. Journal of Educational Measurements: 16; 143-152. Selvin S. (1996) Statistical analysis of epidemiological data. (2nd ed). New York: Oxford University Press. Shealy, R. T. y Stout, W. F. (19933). An item response theory model for test bias and differential test functioning. En P. W. Holland y H. Wainer (Eds). Differential item fundtioning. Hillsdale, N.J.: LEA. Shealy, R. T. y Stout,_IW. F. (1993b). A model based standardization approach that separates true bias/DIF from gruop differences and detects test bias/DIF as well as item bias/DIF. Psychometrika, 58; 159-194. Shepard, L. A. (1982) Definitions of bias. En R. A. Berk (Ed). Handbook of methods for detecting test bias. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkuns University Press. Shepard L. A, Camilli G, Williams DM. (1984) Accounting for statistical artifacts in item bias research. Journal of Educational Statistics : 9;93-128. Stern W. (1914). The psychological methods of testing intelligence. Baltimore: Warwick y York. Swaminathan, H. y Rogers, H. J. (1990). Detecting differential item functioning using logistic regression procedures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27; 361-370. Thissen, D., Stienberg, L. y Gerrard, M. (1986). Beyond groups-mean differences: The concept of bias. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 118-128. Van de Vijver, F. y Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. London: SAGE Publications. |
| dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv |
Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2001 |
| dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.rights.creativecommons.spa.fl_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) |
| dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2001 Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Católica de Colombia. Facultad de Psicología |
| institution |
Universidad Católica de Colombia |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/e0942980-46cc-4aeb-bbc3-91671b318f9f/download https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/cf9a891e-6aba-493a-bc4d-64322725d9c2/download https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/87079543-7776-4d0c-b067-bb3791be4e4b/download |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
e9d23308bfff7704a25de5cda17ce87a 46dab46279ab4ecb929adb971a632731 14c42a34cbf1b6e102d8297f5d0866e3 |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaC |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdigital@metabiblioteca.com |
| _version_ |
1814256369992204288 |
| spelling |
Herrera-Rojas, Aura Nidia9ab6c7d5-25d0-4e57-a428-350a52ae0274-1Sánchez-Pedraza, Ricardo5aa0aca7-4caf-414d-b575-84c66f23ec25-1Gómez-Benito, Juana57dcf2d1-90e2-4df8-b403-67ecc58213ae-12019-02-19T15:29:06Z2019-02-19T15:29:06Z2001-07Today, identifying biased item tests is an inevitable task in the process of construction and validation of psychological tests. Thus, it is important to understand the concepts related to Differential Items Functioning (DIF) and the methods for its detection. This paper re¬views the basic concepts related to DIF within the context of tests construct validity. In addition, some important methods, commonly used for DIF detection, are described em¬phasizing the advantages and limitations for its practical use.application/pdfHerrera-Rojas, A., Sánchez-Pedraza, R., & Gómez-Benito, J. (2001). Funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems: una revisión conceptual y metodológica. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 0(5), 41-61. Recuperado de https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/ojsucatolica/revistas_ucatolica/index.php/acta-colombiana-psicologia/article/view/5890123-9155https://hdl.handle.net/10983/22764spaUniversidad Católica de Colombia. Facultad de PsicologíaActa Colombiana de Psicología, No. 5 (jul. 2001); p. 41-61Anastasi (1974) Test Psicológicos (3ra ed.).. Madrid: Aguilar.Anastasi, A. y Urbina, S (1998). Test Psicológicos. (7a ed.) México: Prentice Hall.Angoff W.H. (1982). Use of difficulty and discrimination indices dor detecting item bias. En RA Berk (Ed), Handbook of Methods for Detecting Test Bias. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press..Angoff W. H. (1993). Perspectives on Differential Item Functioning Methodology. En P. W. Holland y H. Wainer (Eds), Differential Item Functioning. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Baker, F. B. (1981). A criticism of Sheuneman’s item bias technique. Journal of Educational Measurement, 18, 59-62.Binet, A. y Simon, T. (1916). The development of intelligence in children. New York: Arno.Bond, L. (1987). The Golden Rule settlement: A minority perspective. Educational Measurement: Isuues and Practice. 6, 18-20.Camilli, G. y Shepard, L. (1994). Methods for identiting biased test items. London: SAGE Publications.Christensen R. (1997). Log-Linear Models and Logistic regression. 2nd ed. 'New York: Springer.Cole, N. (1993). History and Development of DIF. En P. W. Holland y H. Wainer (Eds), Diferential Item Functioning. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Dorans, N. J. y Holland, P. W. 1993. DIF Detection and Description: Mantel-Haenszel and Standarization. En P. W. Holland y H. Wainer (Eds), Diferential Item Functioning. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Eelles, K. Havighurst, R. J., Herrick, V. E. y Tyler, R. W. (1951). Intelligence and cultural dijferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Faggen, J (1987) Golden Rule revisited: Introduction. Educational Measurement: Isuues and Practice. 6, 5-8.Ferreres, D. (1998). Funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems de una prueba de aptitud intelectual en función de la lengua familiar y la lengua de escolarización. Valencia: Universitat de Valencia. Tesis doctoral inédita.Fidalgo, AM. (1996). Funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems. En J. Muñiz (Coord.) Psicometría. Madrid: Editorial Universitas, S.A.Gómez, J., c Hidalgo, M. D. (1997). Evaluación del funcionamiento diferencial en ítems dicótomos: una revisión metodológica. Anuario de Psicología. 74, 3-32.Hambleton, R. K., Clauser, B. E., Mazor, K. M. y Jones, R. W. (1993). Advances in the detection of Differentially functioning test items. Journal of Psychological Assessment, 9(1), 1-18.Holland, P. W. y Thayer, D. T. (1988). Differential item performance and Mantel-Haenszel procedure. En H. Wainer y H.I. Braun (Eds) Test Validity. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Holland, P. W. y Wainer, H. (1993). Preface En P. W. Holland y H. Wainer (Eds), Dijferential Item Functioning. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Ironson GH. (1982). Use of chi-square and latente trait approaches for detecting item bias. En RA Berk (Ed). Handbook of Methods for Detecting Test Bias. Baltmore: John Hopkins University Press.Jensen, A. R. (1969). How much can we boast IQ and scholastic achievement?. Harvard Educational Review, 39, 1-123.Kahn H.A., Sempos CT. (1989). Statistical methods in Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press.Kleinbaum D.G. (1994). Logistic regression. A selfleaming text. New York: Springer.Lim, R. G. y Drasgow, F. (1987). Implications of the Golden Rule settlement for test construction. Educational Measurement: Isuues and Practice, 6, 13-17.Lim, R. G. y Drasgow, F. (1990). Evaluation of Two methods for estimating Item Response Theory parameters when assessing differential item functioning. Journal oprplied Psychology. 75(2), 164-174.Linn R, L., Hamisch D.L. (1981) Interactions between item content and group membership on achievement test items. Journal of Educational Measurement ; 18: 109-118.Linn, R. L. Levine, M. V. Hastings, G. N. y Wardrop, J. L. (1981) An investigation of item bias in a test on reading comprehension. Applied Psychological Measurement. 5, 159-173.Lord, F. M. (1980). Aplications of Item Response Theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale: LEA.Mantel, N. y Haenszel, W. (1959). Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. Journal of The National Cancer Institute, 22, 719-748.Mellenbergh. G. (1982). Contingency table models for assesing item bias. Journal of Educational Statistics. 7, 105-118.Millsap. R. E. y Everson, H. T. (1993). Methodology review: Statistical approaches for assessing measurement bias. Applied Psychological Measurement. 17, 297-334.Muñiz. J. (1997) Introducción a la teoría de respuesta al Ítem. Madrid: Ediciones Pirámide.Muniz. J. (1998) Teoría clásica de los test. Madrid: Ediciones Pirámide.Powers, D. A. y Xie, Y. (2000). Statistical Methads for catagorical Data Analysis. San Diego: Academic Press.Prieto Marañón, P.; Barbero García, M. I. y San Luis Costas, C. (1997). Identification of nonuniform differential item functioning: A comparison of Mantel-Haenszel and Item Response Theory analysis procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57 (4) 559-568.Raju, N. S. (1990). Determining the significance of estimated signed dnd unsigned areas between two item response function. Applied Psychological Measurement. 14, 197-207.Reynolds, C. R. (1982). Methods for detecting construct and predictive bias. En R. A. Berk, (Ed). Handbook of methods for detecting test bias. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkuns University Press.Rosner B. (1995) Fundamentals of Biostatistics. (4a ed). Belmont: Duxbury Press.Rudner. L.M.. Getson, P.R. y Knight, BL. (1980). A Monte Carlo comparison of seven biased item detection techniques. Journal o Educational Measurement, 17(1), 1-10.Schcuneman JD. (1979). A new method for assesing bias in test items. Journal of Educational Measurements: 16; 143-152.Selvin S. (1996) Statistical analysis of epidemiological data. (2nd ed). New York: Oxford University Press.Shealy, R. T. y Stout, W. F. (19933). An item response theory model for test bias and differential test functioning. En P. W. Holland y H. Wainer (Eds). Differential item fundtioning. Hillsdale, N.J.: LEA.Shealy, R. T. y Stout,_IW. F. (1993b). A model based standardization approach that separates true bias/DIF from gruop differences and detects test bias/DIF as well as item bias/DIF. Psychometrika, 58; 159-194.Shepard, L. A. (1982) Definitions of bias. En R. A. Berk (Ed). Handbook of methods for detecting test bias. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkuns University Press.Shepard L. A, Camilli G, Williams DM. (1984) Accounting for statistical artifacts in item bias research. Journal of Educational Statistics : 9;93-128.Stern W. (1914). The psychological methods of testing intelligence. Baltimore: Warwick y York.Swaminathan, H. y Rogers, H. J. (1990). Detecting differential item functioning using logistic regression procedures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27; 361-370.Thissen, D., Stienberg, L. y Gerrard, M. (1986). Beyond groups-mean differences: The concept of bias. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 118-128.Van de Vijver, F. y Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. London: SAGE Publications.Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2001info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2DIFITEM DE BIASPRUEBA DE BIASDIFBIAS ITEMBIAS TESTFuncionamiento diferencial de los ítems: una revisión conceptual y metodológicaArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85PublicationORIGINAL589-1652-1-SM.pdf589-1652-1-SM.pdfArtículo principalapplication/pdf1244243https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/e0942980-46cc-4aeb-bbc3-91671b318f9f/downloade9d23308bfff7704a25de5cda17ce87aMD51TEXT589-1652-1-SM.pdf.txt589-1652-1-SM.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain21https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/cf9a891e-6aba-493a-bc4d-64322725d9c2/download46dab46279ab4ecb929adb971a632731MD52THUMBNAIL589-1652-1-SM.pdf.jpg589-1652-1-SM.pdf.jpgRIUCACimage/jpeg17077https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/87079543-7776-4d0c-b067-bb3791be4e4b/download14c42a34cbf1b6e102d8297f5d0866e3MD5310983/22764oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/227642023-03-24 17:22:53.534https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2001https://repository.ucatolica.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaCbdigital@metabiblioteca.com |