Innovación, design y sostenibilidad social : nuevas tendencias para el desarrollo local en la contemporaneidad.
Se toman como punto de partida las "contracorrientes" que visionaba Gui Bonsiepe en 1978, sobre la práctica del design. Se revisa el perfeccionamiento de esas ideas a partir de la evolución del concepto de sostenibilidad, su enfoque social y su relación con la innovación y el design. En co...
- Autores:
-
Martínez-Osorio, Pedro Arturo
Barana, Mareia
Roeha-Carneiro, Rodrigo
Paschoarelli, Luis Carlos
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2017
- Institución:
- Universidad Católica de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/28826
- Palabra clave:
- Participatory design
Social innovation
Sustainability
Design
Design
Design participativo
Innovación social
Sostenibilidad
Design
Design participativo
Inovação social
Sustentabilidade
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Pedro Arturo Martínez-Osorio - 2017
| id |
UCATOLICA2_1fa2e298ef431e3178562c6f707ce7a0 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/28826 |
| network_acronym_str |
UCATOLICA2 |
| network_name_str |
RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Innovación, design y sostenibilidad social : nuevas tendencias para el desarrollo local en la contemporaneidad. |
| dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv |
Innovación, design y sostenibilidad social : nuevas tendencias para el desarrollo local en la contemporaneidad. |
| title |
Innovación, design y sostenibilidad social : nuevas tendencias para el desarrollo local en la contemporaneidad. |
| spellingShingle |
Innovación, design y sostenibilidad social : nuevas tendencias para el desarrollo local en la contemporaneidad. Participatory design Social innovation Sustainability Design Design Design participativo Innovación social Sostenibilidad Design Design participativo Inovação social Sustentabilidade |
| title_short |
Innovación, design y sostenibilidad social : nuevas tendencias para el desarrollo local en la contemporaneidad. |
| title_full |
Innovación, design y sostenibilidad social : nuevas tendencias para el desarrollo local en la contemporaneidad. |
| title_fullStr |
Innovación, design y sostenibilidad social : nuevas tendencias para el desarrollo local en la contemporaneidad. |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Innovación, design y sostenibilidad social : nuevas tendencias para el desarrollo local en la contemporaneidad. |
| title_sort |
Innovación, design y sostenibilidad social : nuevas tendencias para el desarrollo local en la contemporaneidad. |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Martínez-Osorio, Pedro Arturo Barana, Mareia Roeha-Carneiro, Rodrigo Paschoarelli, Luis Carlos |
| dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv |
Martínez-Osorio, Pedro Arturo Barana, Mareia Roeha-Carneiro, Rodrigo Paschoarelli, Luis Carlos |
| dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Participatory design Social innovation Sustainability Design |
| topic |
Participatory design Social innovation Sustainability Design Design Design participativo Innovación social Sostenibilidad Design Design participativo Inovação social Sustentabilidade |
| dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv |
Design Design participativo Innovación social Sostenibilidad Design Design participativo Inovação social Sustentabilidade |
| description |
Se toman como punto de partida las "contracorrientes" que visionaba Gui Bonsiepe en 1978, sobre la práctica del design. Se revisa el perfeccionamiento de esas ideas a partir de la evolución del concepto de sostenibilidad, su enfoque social y su relación con la innovación y el design. En correspondencia con los planteamientos de Bonsiepe, se identifican cambios en el papel del design para atender nuevas necesidades sociales; como ejemplos se presentan intervenciones de design participativo e innovación social, que generan alternativas de desarrollo local en la ciudad contemporánea. Nuevas realidades hacen más importantes las capacidades de construcción de productos intangibles. La acción política del design es cada vez más urgente; los designers están llamados a cumplir un papel protagónico en la construcción crítica de la nueva ciudadanía. Un nuevo campo de acción, el design social. |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-10-17 00:00:00 2023-01-23T16:05:21Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-10-17 00:00:00 2023-01-23T16:05:21Z |
| dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-10-17 |
| dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de revista |
| dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
| dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv |
Text |
| dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv |
Journal article |
| dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF |
| dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.14718/RevArq.2017.19.2.1406 |
| dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv |
2357-626X |
| dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
1657-0308 |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/10983/28826 |
| dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.14718/RevArq.2017.19.2.1406 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.14718/RevArq.2017.19.2.1406 2357-626X 1657-0308 |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10983/28826 https://doi.org/10.14718/RevArq.2017.19.2.1406 |
| dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistadearquitectura.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/1406/1674 https://revistadearquitectura.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/1406/pdf-PedMar https://revistadearquitectura.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/1406/1895 https://revistadearquitectura.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/1406/1950 https://revistadearquitectura.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/1406/2784 |
| dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv |
Núm. 2 , Año 2017 : Julio - diciembre |
| dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv |
77 |
| dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv |
2 |
| dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv |
68 |
| dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv |
19 |
| dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Arquitectura (Bogotá) |
| dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv |
Alexandre, C. B., Gómez, E. A., Valente, A. C. (2015). Interdisciplinary relationship between Designer and Craftsman based on Integrated Craft Manufacturing Systems. Procedia Engineering, 132, 1089-1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.600 Barbero, S. y Cozzo, B. (2009). Ecodesign. Kõnigswinter: H. F. Ullmann. Bologna (2014). Bologna regulation on public collaboration for urban commons. Fondazione del Monte di Bologna e Ravenna. LabGov - LABoratory for the GOVernance of commons. Recuperado de http://www.labgov.it/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/Bologna-Regulation-on-collaboration-between-citizens-and-the-city-for-the-cure-and-regeneration-of-urban-commons1.pdf. Bonsiepe, G. (1978). Teoría y práctica del diseño industrial. Elementos para una manualística crítica. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili. Campbell, W. (2014). Designs: An archaeology of "craft" as god term. Computers and Composition, 33, 50-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2014.07.002 Chen, D., Cheng, L., Hummels, C. y Koskinen, I. (2016). Social design: An introduction. International Journal of Design, 10, 1. Recuperado de: http://ijdesign.org/ojs/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/2622 Ekomadyo, A. y Yuliar, S. (2015). Social reassembling as design strategies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 184, 152-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.05.075 El-Husseiny, M. A. y Kesseiba, K. (2012). Challenges of social sustainability in neo-liberal Cairo: Re-questioning the role of public space. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 68, 790-803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.267 Abd Elrahman, Ahmed. (2016). Tactical urbanism "a pop-up local change for cairo's built environment". Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216. https://doi.org/ Doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.032 Felicetti, M. (2016). Cultural innovation and local development: Matera as a cultural district. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 223, 614-618. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.366 Fuad-Luke, A. (2010). Ecodesign: The Sourcebook (3 ed., Fully Revised). San Francisco: Chronicle Books LLC. Guimarães, L. B. M. (2009). Design e sustentabilidade: Brasil: produção e consumo, design sociotécnico. Porto Alegre: FEENG/UFRGS. Recuperado de https://estudo-semdesign.emnuvens.com.br/design/article/view/369 Harazin, P. y Kósi, K. (2013). Social challenges: Social innovation through social responsibility. Periodica Polytechnica. Social and Management Sciences 21 (1), 27-38. https://doi.org/ Doi: 10.3311/PPso.2154 Hillgren, P. A. y Seravalli, A. (2016). Counterhegemonic practices; dynamic interplay between agonism, commoning and strategic design. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9 (2), 89-99. https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.04 Howaldt, J., Domanski, D. y Kaletka, C. (2016). Social innovation: Towards a new innovation paradigm. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 17 (6), 20-44. https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-69712016/administracao.v17n6p20-44. Huybrechts, L., Dreessen, K., Schepers, S. y Calderon, P. (2016). Democratic dialogues that make cities 'work'. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9 (2),100-111 https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.05 Ibarra Muñoz, D. (2014). Desarrollo mundial evanescente. Economía UNAM, 11 (32), 3-20. Recuperado de: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1665-952X2014000200001&lng=es&tlng Kelkar, N. P y Spinelli, G. (2016). Building social capital through creative placemaking. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9(2), 54-66. https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.01 Lydon, M., Bartman, D., Woudstra, R. y Khawazard, A. (2012). Tactical urbanism 1. Shortterm action, long-term change. Street Plans Collective. Recuperado de https://issuu.com/streetplanscollaborative/docs/tactical_urbanism_vol.1. Manzini, E. (2009). New design knowledge. Design Studies, 30 (1), 4-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.10.001 Manzini, E. (2014). Design in a changing, connected world. Strategic Design Research Journal, 7 (2), 95-99. https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2014.72.06 Manzini, E. y Vezzoli, C. (2002). O desenvolvimento de produtos sustentáveis. Os requisitos ambientais dos produtos industriais. São Paulo: Editora da Universidade de São Paulo. Marttila, S. y Botero, A. (2016). Bees, drones and other Things in public space: strategizing in the city. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9. https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.03 Matei, C. S. (2014). Globalization - An Anthropological Approach. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 149, 542 -546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbs-pro.2014.08.207 Mcdonough, W. y Braungart, M. (2013). Cradle to cradle: criar e reciclar ilimitadamente. São Paulo: Gustavo Gili. McKenzie, S. (2004). Social sustainability: Towards some definitions. Working Paper Series, 27. Magill, South Australia: Hawke Research Institute. University of South Australia. Recuperado de http://w3.unisa.edu.au/hawkeinstitute/publications/downloads/wp27.pdf Monteiro, B. G. y Wagner, R. (2008)Design e inovação social. Estudos em Design, 16 (2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.5151/9788580392647-01 Moura M., Pereira de Andrade, A. B., Jardim Tarozzo, M. y Muniz Ambiel, I. Design contemporâneo e o resgate da memória: projeto interdisciplinar, 12° Congresso Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Design, Blucher Design Proceedings,2, 2869-2881. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/despro-ped2016-0246 Mulgan G., Tucker, A. R. y Sanders, B. (2007). Social Innovation. What is it, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. London: The Basingstoke Press, The Young Foundation. Recuperado de http://youngfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Social-Innovation-what-it-is-why-it-matters-how-it-can-be-accelerated-March-2007.pdf Napawan, N. C. y Snyder, B. (2016). # FOGWASTE: Participatory urbanism towards place-understanding. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9 (2), 67. Recuperado de http://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/sdrj/article/view/sdrj.2016.92.02 Navastara, A. M., Pradinie, K. y Martha, K. E. (2016). Ambiguous public space towards social sustainability in madurese urban Kampong. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 227, 507-514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.108 Pacheco, J. C., Barrero, G. E. y Gómez Vásquez, G. (2013). An eco-technological approach to handcraft production: Two cases in the colombian caribbean region. Cuadernos de Desarrollo Rural, 10 (spe70), 115-129. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0122-14502013000100006&lng=en&tlng=en Patarakin, Y. y Shilova, O. (2015). Concept of learning design for collaborative network activity. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 214, 1083-1090. Phills J., Deiglmeier, K. y Miller, D. (2008). Rediscovering Social Innovation. Social Innovation Review (pp. 33-43). Stanford: Stanford University. Papanek, V. (1995). Arquitectura e Design -Ecologia e ética. Lisboa: Edições 70 (reimpresión 2007). Pinho, M. (2013). Domingos Tótora. Rio de Janeiro: Papel & Tinta. Pollice, F. (2016). Urban planning and architectural design for sustainable development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216, 6-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.068 Romeiro Filho, E. (2015). Brazilian design for sustainability: In search of a local approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 467-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.065 Sadat Sahragard Monfared, N., Hashemnejad, H. y Abbas Yazdanfar, S. (2015). Design principles in sustainable local community with security and socialization approach (Case study: Chizar). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 201, 62-70 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.119. Salonia, P. (2016). Tourism, migration, heritage, culture, inclusion: Recovering the memory of ourselves for the sustainable cities and the society of the XXI century. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 223, 668-675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.382 Sanders, E. B. N. y Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design, 4 (1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068 Sarmah, B., Islam, J. U. y Rahman, Z. (2015). Sustainability, social responsibility and value co-creation: A case study based approach. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 189, 314-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.227 Selloni, D. y Manzini, E. (2016). Policy constellations as ecosystems of design actions: Exploring three cases of social innovation policies in Italy. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9 (2), 128. https://doi.org/Doi:10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.07 Tyl, B., Lizarralde, I., Allais, R. (2015). Local value creation and eco-design: A new paradigm. Procedia CIRP, 30, 155-160. https://doi.org/ Doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.024 Tung, F. W. (2012). Weaving with rush: Exploring Craft-design collaborations in revitalizing a local craft. International Journal of Design, 6 (3). Recuperado de http://www.ijdesign.org/ojs/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/1077 Unesco (2005). Designers meet artisans. A practical guide. New Delhi: Artesanías de Colombia, Unesco. Recuperado de: http://www.unesco.org/images/0014/001471/147132EO.pdf Yair, K., Press, M., Tomes, A. (2001). Crafting competitive advantage: Crafts knowledge as a strategic resource. Design Studies, 22 (4), 377-394. van Reusel, H. (2016). Wandering as a design strategy for infrastructuring. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9 (2), 112-127. 2.https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.06 Vilar, K. y Cartes, I. (2016). Urban design and social capital in slums. Case study: Moravia's neighborhood, Medellin, 2004-2014. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216, 56-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.008 Walker, S. (2014). Terra de resíduos: sustentabilidade e design com dignidade. Maria Cecília Loschiavo dos Santos. Design Resíduo & Dignidade (pp. 15-27). São Paulo: Olhares. WWF Brasil (2016). O planeta precisa de 1,5 anos para regenerar os recursos renováveis que consumimos em um ano. Recuperado de: http://www.wwf.org.br/natureza_brasi-leira/especiais/pegada_ecologica/pegada_ecologicaglobal/ |
| dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv |
Pedro Arturo Martínez-Osorio - 2017 |
| dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Pedro Arturo Martínez-Osorio - 2017 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
text/html application/pdf application/epub+zip application/xml application/x-rar |
| dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Católica de Colombia |
| dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://revistadearquitectura.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/1406 |
| institution |
Universidad Católica de Colombia |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/fff24e25-889a-4165-a9e7-79fe063f0d55/download |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
c21999d15762e9dfe76c61f4b6a02780 |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaC |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdigital@metabiblioteca.com |
| _version_ |
1814256368878616576 |
| spelling |
Martínez-Osorio, Pedro Arturo011168ce-741c-4cf1-b789-a24a64fa63fd300Barana, Mareia1efb1050-740f-45a3-8915-7e67588b36e1300Roeha-Carneiro, Rodrigoc40d5dff-e664-4014-a85d-062e0be1ba9c300Paschoarelli, Luis Carlosaa6b88e1-c200-4e04-9781-b4e98de349193002017-10-17 00:00:002023-01-23T16:05:21Z2017-10-17 00:00:002023-01-23T16:05:21Z2017-10-17Se toman como punto de partida las "contracorrientes" que visionaba Gui Bonsiepe en 1978, sobre la práctica del design. Se revisa el perfeccionamiento de esas ideas a partir de la evolución del concepto de sostenibilidad, su enfoque social y su relación con la innovación y el design. En correspondencia con los planteamientos de Bonsiepe, se identifican cambios en el papel del design para atender nuevas necesidades sociales; como ejemplos se presentan intervenciones de design participativo e innovación social, que generan alternativas de desarrollo local en la ciudad contemporánea. Nuevas realidades hacen más importantes las capacidades de construcción de productos intangibles. La acción política del design es cada vez más urgente; los designers están llamados a cumplir un papel protagónico en la construcción crítica de la nueva ciudadanía. Un nuevo campo de acción, el design social.This paper takes as its point of departure the "counter-currents" envisioned by Gui Bonsiepe in 1978 regarding the practice of design. The development of these ideas is reviewed based on the evolution of the concept of sustainability, as well as its social approach and relationship with innovation and design. In line with Bonsiepe's ideas, the paper identifies changes in the role of design in order to meet new social needs; as examples, it presents interventions based on participatory design and social innovation, which generate alternatives for local development in the contemporary city. Due to new realities, the ability to construct intangible products is ever more important. The political action of design is more and more urgent; designers are called to play a leading role in the critical construction of new citizenship identities. A new field of action: social design.text/htmlapplication/pdfapplication/epub+zipapplication/xmlapplication/x-rar10.14718/RevArq.2017.19.2.14062357-626X1657-0308https://hdl.handle.net/10983/28826https://doi.org/10.14718/RevArq.2017.19.2.1406spaUniversidad Católica de Colombiahttps://revistadearquitectura.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/1406/1674https://revistadearquitectura.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/1406/pdf-PedMarhttps://revistadearquitectura.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/1406/1895https://revistadearquitectura.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/1406/1950https://revistadearquitectura.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/1406/2784Núm. 2 , Año 2017 : Julio - diciembre7726819Revista de Arquitectura (Bogotá)Alexandre, C. B., Gómez, E. A., Valente, A. C. (2015). Interdisciplinary relationship between Designer and Craftsman based on Integrated Craft Manufacturing Systems. Procedia Engineering, 132, 1089-1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.600Barbero, S. y Cozzo, B. (2009). Ecodesign. Kõnigswinter: H. F. Ullmann.Bologna (2014). Bologna regulation on public collaboration for urban commons. Fondazione del Monte di Bologna e Ravenna. LabGov - LABoratory for the GOVernance of commons. Recuperado de http://www.labgov.it/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/Bologna-Regulation-on-collaboration-between-citizens-and-the-city-for-the-cure-and-regeneration-of-urban-commons1.pdf.Bonsiepe, G. (1978). Teoría y práctica del diseño industrial. Elementos para una manualística crítica. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.Campbell, W. (2014). Designs: An archaeology of "craft" as god term. Computers and Composition, 33, 50-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2014.07.002Chen, D., Cheng, L., Hummels, C. y Koskinen, I. (2016). Social design: An introduction. International Journal of Design, 10, 1. Recuperado de: http://ijdesign.org/ojs/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/2622Ekomadyo, A. y Yuliar, S. (2015). Social reassembling as design strategies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 184, 152-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.05.075El-Husseiny, M. A. y Kesseiba, K. (2012). Challenges of social sustainability in neo-liberal Cairo: Re-questioning the role of public space. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 68, 790-803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.267Abd Elrahman, Ahmed. (2016). Tactical urbanism "a pop-up local change for cairo's built environment". Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216. https://doi.org/ Doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.032Felicetti, M. (2016). Cultural innovation and local development: Matera as a cultural district. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 223, 614-618. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.366Fuad-Luke, A. (2010). Ecodesign: The Sourcebook (3 ed., Fully Revised). San Francisco: Chronicle Books LLC.Guimarães, L. B. M. (2009). Design e sustentabilidade: Brasil: produção e consumo, design sociotécnico. Porto Alegre: FEENG/UFRGS. Recuperado de https://estudo-semdesign.emnuvens.com.br/design/article/view/369Harazin, P. y Kósi, K. (2013). Social challenges: Social innovation through social responsibility. Periodica Polytechnica. Social and Management Sciences 21 (1), 27-38. https://doi.org/ Doi: 10.3311/PPso.2154Hillgren, P. A. y Seravalli, A. (2016). Counterhegemonic practices; dynamic interplay between agonism, commoning and strategic design. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9 (2), 89-99. https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.04Howaldt, J., Domanski, D. y Kaletka, C. (2016). Social innovation: Towards a new innovation paradigm. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 17 (6), 20-44. https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-69712016/administracao.v17n6p20-44.Huybrechts, L., Dreessen, K., Schepers, S. y Calderon, P. (2016). Democratic dialogues that make cities 'work'. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9 (2),100-111 https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.05Ibarra Muñoz, D. (2014). Desarrollo mundial evanescente. Economía UNAM, 11 (32), 3-20. Recuperado de: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1665-952X2014000200001&lng=es&tlngKelkar, N. P y Spinelli, G. (2016). Building social capital through creative placemaking. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9(2), 54-66. https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.01Lydon, M., Bartman, D., Woudstra, R. y Khawazard, A. (2012). Tactical urbanism 1. Shortterm action, long-term change. Street Plans Collective. Recuperado de https://issuu.com/streetplanscollaborative/docs/tactical_urbanism_vol.1.Manzini, E. (2009). New design knowledge. Design Studies, 30 (1), 4-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.10.001Manzini, E. (2014). Design in a changing, connected world. Strategic Design Research Journal, 7 (2), 95-99. https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2014.72.06Manzini, E. y Vezzoli, C. (2002). O desenvolvimento de produtos sustentáveis. Os requisitos ambientais dos produtos industriais. São Paulo: Editora da Universidade de São Paulo.Marttila, S. y Botero, A. (2016). Bees, drones and other Things in public space: strategizing in the city. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9. https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.03Matei, C. S. (2014). Globalization - An Anthropological Approach. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 149, 542 -546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbs-pro.2014.08.207Mcdonough, W. y Braungart, M. (2013). Cradle to cradle: criar e reciclar ilimitadamente. São Paulo: Gustavo Gili.McKenzie, S. (2004). Social sustainability: Towards some definitions. Working Paper Series, 27. Magill, South Australia: Hawke Research Institute. University of South Australia. Recuperado de http://w3.unisa.edu.au/hawkeinstitute/publications/downloads/wp27.pdfMonteiro, B. G. y Wagner, R. (2008)Design e inovação social. Estudos em Design, 16 (2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.5151/9788580392647-01Moura M., Pereira de Andrade, A. B., Jardim Tarozzo, M. y Muniz Ambiel, I. Design contemporâneo e o resgate da memória: projeto interdisciplinar, 12° Congresso Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Design, Blucher Design Proceedings,2, 2869-2881. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/despro-ped2016-0246Mulgan G., Tucker, A. R. y Sanders, B. (2007). Social Innovation. What is it, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. London: The Basingstoke Press, The Young Foundation. Recuperado de http://youngfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Social-Innovation-what-it-is-why-it-matters-how-it-can-be-accelerated-March-2007.pdfNapawan, N. C. y Snyder, B. (2016). # FOGWASTE: Participatory urbanism towards place-understanding. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9 (2), 67. Recuperado de http://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/sdrj/article/view/sdrj.2016.92.02Navastara, A. M., Pradinie, K. y Martha, K. E. (2016). Ambiguous public space towards social sustainability in madurese urban Kampong. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 227, 507-514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.108Pacheco, J. C., Barrero, G. E. y Gómez Vásquez, G. (2013). An eco-technological approach to handcraft production: Two cases in the colombian caribbean region. Cuadernos de Desarrollo Rural, 10 (spe70), 115-129. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0122-14502013000100006&lng=en&tlng=enPatarakin, Y. y Shilova, O. (2015). Concept of learning design for collaborative network activity. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 214, 1083-1090.Phills J., Deiglmeier, K. y Miller, D. (2008). Rediscovering Social Innovation. Social Innovation Review (pp. 33-43). Stanford: Stanford University.Papanek, V. (1995). Arquitectura e Design -Ecologia e ética. Lisboa: Edições 70 (reimpresión 2007).Pinho, M. (2013). Domingos Tótora. Rio de Janeiro: Papel & Tinta.Pollice, F. (2016). Urban planning and architectural design for sustainable development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216, 6-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.068Romeiro Filho, E. (2015). Brazilian design for sustainability: In search of a local approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 467-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.065Sadat Sahragard Monfared, N., Hashemnejad, H. y Abbas Yazdanfar, S. (2015). Design principles in sustainable local community with security and socialization approach (Case study: Chizar). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 201, 62-70 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.119.Salonia, P. (2016). Tourism, migration, heritage, culture, inclusion: Recovering the memory of ourselves for the sustainable cities and the society of the XXI century. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 223, 668-675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.382Sanders, E. B. N. y Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design, 4 (1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068Sarmah, B., Islam, J. U. y Rahman, Z. (2015). Sustainability, social responsibility and value co-creation: A case study based approach. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 189, 314-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.227Selloni, D. y Manzini, E. (2016). Policy constellations as ecosystems of design actions: Exploring three cases of social innovation policies in Italy. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9 (2), 128. https://doi.org/Doi:10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.07Tyl, B., Lizarralde, I., Allais, R. (2015). Local value creation and eco-design: A new paradigm. Procedia CIRP, 30, 155-160. https://doi.org/ Doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.024Tung, F. W. (2012). Weaving with rush: Exploring Craft-design collaborations in revitalizing a local craft. International Journal of Design, 6 (3). Recuperado de http://www.ijdesign.org/ojs/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/1077Unesco (2005). Designers meet artisans. A practical guide. New Delhi: Artesanías de Colombia, Unesco. Recuperado de: http://www.unesco.org/images/0014/001471/147132EO.pdfYair, K., Press, M., Tomes, A. (2001). Crafting competitive advantage: Crafts knowledge as a strategic resource. Design Studies, 22 (4), 377-394.van Reusel, H. (2016). Wandering as a design strategy for infrastructuring. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9 (2), 112-127. 2.https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.06Vilar, K. y Cartes, I. (2016). Urban design and social capital in slums. Case study: Moravia's neighborhood, Medellin, 2004-2014. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216, 56-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.008Walker, S. (2014). Terra de resíduos: sustentabilidade e design com dignidade. Maria Cecília Loschiavo dos Santos. Design Resíduo & Dignidade (pp. 15-27). São Paulo: Olhares.WWF Brasil (2016). O planeta precisa de 1,5 anos para regenerar os recursos renováveis que consumimos em um ano. Recuperado de: http://www.wwf.org.br/natureza_brasi-leira/especiais/pegada_ecologica/pegada_ecologicaglobal/Pedro Arturo Martínez-Osorio - 2017info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://revistadearquitectura.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/1406Participatory designSocial innovationSustainabilityDesignDesignDesign participativoInnovación socialSostenibilidadDesignDesign participativoInovação socialSustentabilidadeInnovación, design y sostenibilidad social : nuevas tendencias para el desarrollo local en la contemporaneidad.Innovación, design y sostenibilidad social : nuevas tendencias para el desarrollo local en la contemporaneidad.Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2810https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/fff24e25-889a-4165-a9e7-79fe063f0d55/downloadc21999d15762e9dfe76c61f4b6a02780MD5110983/28826oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/288262023-03-24 17:20:46.437https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Pedro Arturo Martínez-Osorio - 2017https://repository.ucatolica.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaCbdigital@metabiblioteca.com |