¿Por qué los responsables políticos y los científicos sociales deberían adoptar la economía del comportamiento? Un análisis para el periodo 2000-2020

Este artículo presenta un análisis de la conveniencia de aplicar la Economía del Comportamiento (BE) por parte de investigadores sociales y hacedores de políticas públicas. En los últimos veinte años el número de contribuciones sobre BE ha crecido exponencialmente, tanto en la literatura científica...

Full description

Autores:: Aliende, Iñaki
Escot-Mangas, Lorenzo

Tipo de recurso:: Article of investigation

Fecha de publicación:: 2022

Institución:: Universidad Católica de Colombia

Repositorio:: RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica

Idioma:: eng

id	UCATOLICA2_1dfdda07ef91af641a19c180eb2b2c23
oai_identifier_str	oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/29460
network_acronym_str	UCATOLICA2
network_name_str	RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	¿Por qué los responsables políticos y los científicos sociales deberían adoptar la economía del comportamiento? Un análisis para el periodo 2000-2020
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv	Why Policymakers and Social Scientists Should Adopt Behavioral Economics: An Analysis for the Period 2000-2020
title	¿Por qué los responsables políticos y los científicos sociales deberían adoptar la economía del comportamiento? Un análisis para el periodo 2000-2020
spellingShingle	¿Por qué los responsables políticos y los científicos sociales deberían adoptar la economía del comportamiento? Un análisis para el periodo 2000-2020 behavioral economics nudge units cognitive bias bounded rationality methodological framework economic doctrines prospect theory economía del comportamiento unidades de empuje sesgo cognitivo racionalidad limitada marco metodológico doctrinas económicas teoría de la perspectiva
title_short	¿Por qué los responsables políticos y los científicos sociales deberían adoptar la economía del comportamiento? Un análisis para el periodo 2000-2020
title_full	¿Por qué los responsables políticos y los científicos sociales deberían adoptar la economía del comportamiento? Un análisis para el periodo 2000-2020
title_fullStr	¿Por qué los responsables políticos y los científicos sociales deberían adoptar la economía del comportamiento? Un análisis para el periodo 2000-2020
title_full_unstemmed	¿Por qué los responsables políticos y los científicos sociales deberían adoptar la economía del comportamiento? Un análisis para el periodo 2000-2020
title_sort	¿Por qué los responsables políticos y los científicos sociales deberían adoptar la economía del comportamiento? Un análisis para el periodo 2000-2020
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Aliende, Iñaki Escot-Mangas, Lorenzo
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv	Aliende, Iñaki Escot-Mangas, Lorenzo
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv	behavioral economics nudge units cognitive bias bounded rationality methodological framework economic doctrines prospect theory
topic	behavioral economics nudge units cognitive bias bounded rationality methodological framework economic doctrines prospect theory economía del comportamiento unidades de empuje sesgo cognitivo racionalidad limitada marco metodológico doctrinas económicas teoría de la perspectiva
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	economía del comportamiento unidades de empuje sesgo cognitivo racionalidad limitada marco metodológico doctrinas económicas teoría de la perspectiva
description	Este artículo presenta un análisis de la conveniencia de aplicar la Economía del Comportamiento (BE) por parte de investigadores sociales y hacedores de políticas públicas. En los últimos veinte años el número de contribuciones sobre BE ha crecido exponencialmente, tanto en la literatura científica como en informes publicados por organismos internacionales y en las denominadas Behavioral Insight Units (nudge units). Sin embargo, para considerar la BE como una disciplina principal, es necesario estar seguro de que toda esa práctica se corresponde con un enfoque o disciplina distintivo. Este artículo evalúa si podemos considerar que la BE proporciona un enfoque metodológico sólido y único. Hemos analizado veinte artículos relevantes clasificados con la etiqueta “behavioral economics” publicados en los últimos cinco años en revistas destacadas para evaluar si siguen un método único. Según los resultados, el nivel de cumplimiento es alto (84%). Ello amplía las posibilidades de la BE como enfoque para las ciencias sociales, además de reforzar su importancia en el apoyo a la implementación de políticas públicas. Sin embargo, el análisis también aporta algunas observaciones sobre su desarrollo a corto plazo y la consideración de la disciplina como un enfoque homogéneo.
publishDate	2022
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2022-06-29 00:00:00 2023-01-23T16:16:18Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2022-06-29 00:00:00 2023-01-23T16:16:18Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2022-06-29
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversion.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.eng.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.driver.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv	Journal article
dc.type.redcol.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.version.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv	10.14718/revfinanzpolitecon.v14.n2.2022.6
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv	2011-7663
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	2248-6046
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://hdl.handle.net/10983/29460
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.14718/revfinanzpolitecon.v14.n2.2022.6
identifier_str_mv	10.14718/revfinanzpolitecon.v14.n2.2022.6 2011-7663 2248-6046
url	https://hdl.handle.net/10983/29460 https://doi.org/10.14718/revfinanzpolitecon.v14.n2.2022.6
dc.language.iso.eng.fl_str_mv	eng
language	eng
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv	https://revfinypolecon.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/4002/4368 https://revfinypolecon.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/4002/4322 https://revfinypolecon.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/4002/4390
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv	Núm. 2 , Año 2022 : Vol. 14 Núm. 2 (2022)
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv	487
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv	2
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv	453
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv	14
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv	Revista Finanzas y Política Económica
dc.relation.references.eng.fl_str_mv	Akerlof, G. (1970). The Market for Lemons: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431 Akerlof, G. A., & Kranton, R. E. (2010). Identity economics. How Our Identities Shape Our Work, Wages, and Well-Being. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400834181 Alcott, H., & Kessler, J. B. (2019). The Welfare Effects of Nudges: A Case Study of Energy Use Social Comparisons. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 11(1), 236-276. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20170328 Aliende, I. (2020). Choice Architects and Behavioral Economics: Creating a Common Framework to Enhance Research and Collaboration. International Journal of Applied Behavioral Economics, 9(4), 74-82. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJABE.2020100105 American Economic Association. (2021, Sep 30). JEL Classification System. https://www.aeaweb.org/econlit/jelCodes.php Angner, E. (2019). We’re all behavioral economists now. Journal of Economic Methodology, 26(3), 195-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2019.1625210 Barberis, N. (2018). Richard Thaler and the rise of behavioral economics. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 120(3), 661-684. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12313 Battaglio Jr, R. P., Belardinelli, P., Bellé, N., & Cantarelli, P. (2019). Behavioral public administration ad fontes: A synthesis of research on bounded rationality, cognitive biases, and nudging in public organizations. Public Administration Review, 79(3), 304- 320. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12994 Behaviourally Informed Organizations (BI-Org). (2019). About the partnership. https://www.biorgpartnership.com/the-project-full Benartzi, S., Beshears, J., Milkman, K. L., Sunstein, C. R., Thaler, R. H., Shankar, M., Tucker-Ray, W., Congdon, W.J., & Galing, S. (2017). Should governments invest more in nudging? Psychological Science, 28(8), 1041-1055. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617702501 Benson, B., & Manoogian, J. (2021, Sep 30). The Cognitive Bias Codex-180+ biases. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Cognitive_Bias_Codex_-_180%2B_biases,_designed_by_John_Manoogian_III_(jm3).png Berg, N. (2014). The consistency and ecological rationality approaches to normative bounded rationality. Journal of Economic Methodology, 21(4), 375-395. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2014.969910 BEworks. (2020). Our approach. https://beworks.com/what-we-do/#our-approach Business Insights Unit. (2016). Behavioural insights in NSW: Update report 2016. Department of Premier and Cabinet (NSW). https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2016-12/apo-nid181236.pdf Camerer, C. F., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). Behavioral economics: past, present, future. In C.F. Camerer, G. Loewenstein, & M. Rabin (Eds.), Advances in Behavioral Economics (pp. 3-52). Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400829118-004 Clarivate (2021, Jan 21): Web of Science. http://apps.webofknowledge.com/ Digital Science & Research Solutions Inc. (2021, Jan 21). Dimensions. https://app.dimensions.ai/ Ekelund Jr, R. B., & Hébert, R. F. (2006). A History of Economic Theory and Method. Waveland Press. Gawlowski, R. (2019). Behavioral Insights as a New Generation of Public Service Delivery. Polish Political Science Yearbook, 48(2), 319-329. https://doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2019208 Geiger, N. (2017). The rise of behavioral economics: A quantitative assessment. Social Science History, 41(3), 555-583. https://doi.org/10.1017/ssh.2017.17 Halpern, D. (2015). Inside the nudge unit: How small changes can make a big difference. Random House. Hummel, D., & Maedche, A. (2019). How effective is nudging? A quantitative review on the effect sizes and limits of empirical nudging studies. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 80, 47-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2019.03.005 Jones, O. D. (2018). Why behavioral economics isn’t better, and how it could be. In J.C. Teitelbaum & K. Zeiler (Eds.), Research Handbook on Behavioral Law and Economics (pp. 476-504). Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849805681.00028 Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 363-391. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185 Kahneman, D., Wakker, P. P., & Sarin, R. (1997). Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 375-406. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355397555235 Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. Penguin Books. Katona, G. (1951). Psychological analysis of economic behavior. McGraw-Hill Book Company. Maialeh, R. (2019). Generalization of results and neoclassical rationality: unresolved controversies of behavioural economics methodology. Quality & Quantity, 53(4), 1743-1761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-019-00837-1 OECD. (2017). Behavioural Insights and Public Policy Lessons from Around the World. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/behavioural-insights- and-public-policy_9789264270480-en OECD. (2019). Behavioural insights. https://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/behavioural-insights.htm Pesendorfer, W. (2006). Behavioral economics comes of age: A review essay on advances in behavioral economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 44(3), 712-721. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.44.3.712 Ricardo, D. (2018). The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. In J.L. Simon (Ed.), The Economics of Population: Classic Writings (pp. 65-68). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351291521-9 Roberto, C. A., & Kawachi, I. (2015). Behavioral Economics & Public Health. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199398331.001.0001 Rotman School of Management. (2020). Behavioral Economic in Action. https://www.rotman.utoronto.ca/FacultyAndResearch/ResearchCentres/BEAR. Schmidt, A. T., & Engelen, B. (2020). The ethics of nudging: An overview. Philosophy Compass, 15(4), e12658. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12658 Simon, H. A. (1955). A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99-118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852 Smith, A. (1937). The wealth of nations [1776] (Vol. 11937). Smith, A. (2010). The theory of moral sentiments. Penguin. https://doi. org/10.1002/9781118011690.ch10 Smith, T. G. (2016). Is behavioural economics ready to save the world? The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, 4(12), 982. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30060-2 Sunstein, C. R. (2018). Nudging: a very short guide. In B. van der Sloot & A. de Groot (Eds.), The Handbook of Privacy Studies (pp. 173-180). Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9789048540136 Terziev, V., & Kanev, D. (2018). Modern developments in behavioral economics. In The International Science and Technology Conference “FarEast-on” (pp. 10-23). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15577-3_2 Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University Press. Thaler, R. H. (2016). Behavioral economics: Past, present, and future. American Economic Review, 106(7), 1577-1600. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.106.7.1577 The Behavioural Insights Team. (2014). EAST. Four Simple Ways to Apply Behavioural Insights. https://www.bi.team/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/BIT-Publication-EAST_FA_WEB.pdf The Decision Lab. (2020, Sep 30). Biases. https://thedecisionlab.com/biases.
dc.rights.eng.fl_str_mv	Iñaki Aliende, Lorenzo Escot - 2022
dc.rights.accessrights.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.eng.fl_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
rights_invalid_str_mv	Iñaki Aliende, Lorenzo Escot - 2022 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.eng.fl_str_mv	text/html application/pdf text/xml
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad Católica de Colombia
dc.source.eng.fl_str_mv	https://revfinypolecon.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/4002
institution	Universidad Católica de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/8e35ace8-9c1d-4243-9606-6fc4155b110c/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	31ff8c21c2f14874566a779b195c46a7
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_	1812183369099771904
spelling	Aliende, Iñaki310fcaa8-a4c3-4f12-b4f7-ad0be29d2af4300Escot-Mangas, Lorenzo 49c29662-ef6d-497a-bcf6-a37c22ccfa8e2022-06-29 00:00:002023-01-23T16:16:18Z2022-06-29 00:00:002023-01-23T16:16:18Z2022-06-29Este artículo presenta un análisis de la conveniencia de aplicar la Economía del Comportamiento (BE) por parte de investigadores sociales y hacedores de políticas públicas. En los últimos veinte años el número de contribuciones sobre BE ha crecido exponencialmente, tanto en la literatura científica como en informes publicados por organismos internacionales y en las denominadas Behavioral Insight Units (nudge units). Sin embargo, para considerar la BE como una disciplina principal, es necesario estar seguro de que toda esa práctica se corresponde con un enfoque o disciplina distintivo. Este artículo evalúa si podemos considerar que la BE proporciona un enfoque metodológico sólido y único. Hemos analizado veinte artículos relevantes clasificados con la etiqueta “behavioral economics” publicados en los últimos cinco años en revistas destacadas para evaluar si siguen un método único. Según los resultados, el nivel de cumplimiento es alto (84%). Ello amplía las posibilidades de la BE como enfoque para las ciencias sociales, además de reforzar su importancia en el apoyo a la implementación de políticas públicas. Sin embargo, el análisis también aporta algunas observaciones sobre su desarrollo a corto plazo y la consideración de la disciplina como un enfoque homogéneo.This paper analyzes the advisability of applying behavioral economics (BE) by social researchers and policymakers. Over the last twenty years, the number of contributions about BE has grown exponentially in the scientific literature, reports published by international organizations, and the so-called Behavioral Insight Units (nudge units). However, to consider BE a core discipline, it is necessary to ensure that all such behavioral practice corresponds to a distinctive approach or field of study. This article evaluates whether BE provides a solid methodological and unique approach. It has analyzed twenty relevant articles with the label “behavioral economics” published in the last five years in recognized journals to evaluate whether they follow a distinct method. According to the results, the level of compliance is high (84%), which amplifies the possibilities of BE as an approach in social sciences, besides reinforcing its importance in supporting the implementation of public policies. Nevertheless, the analysis also provides some observations about subsequent developments and consideration of the discipline as a homogeneous approach.text/htmlapplication/pdftext/xml10.14718/revfinanzpolitecon.v14.n2.2022.62011-76632248-6046https://hdl.handle.net/10983/29460https://doi.org/10.14718/revfinanzpolitecon.v14.n2.2022.6engUniversidad Católica de Colombiahttps://revfinypolecon.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/4002/4368https://revfinypolecon.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/4002/4322https://revfinypolecon.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/4002/4390Núm. 2 , Año 2022 : Vol. 14 Núm. 2 (2022)487245314Revista Finanzas y Política EconómicaAkerlof, G. (1970). The Market for Lemons: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431Akerlof, G. A., & Kranton, R. E. (2010). Identity economics. How Our Identities Shape Our Work, Wages, and Well-Being. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400834181Alcott, H., & Kessler, J. B. (2019). The Welfare Effects of Nudges: A Case Study of Energy Use Social Comparisons. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 11(1), 236-276. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20170328Aliende, I. (2020). Choice Architects and Behavioral Economics: Creating a Common Framework to Enhance Research and Collaboration. International Journal of Applied Behavioral Economics, 9(4), 74-82. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJABE.2020100105American Economic Association. (2021, Sep 30). JEL Classification System. https://www.aeaweb.org/econlit/jelCodes.phpAngner, E. (2019). We’re all behavioral economists now. Journal of Economic Methodology, 26(3), 195-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2019.1625210Barberis, N. (2018). Richard Thaler and the rise of behavioral economics. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 120(3), 661-684. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12313Battaglio Jr, R. P., Belardinelli, P., Bellé, N., & Cantarelli, P. (2019). Behavioral public administration ad fontes: A synthesis of research on bounded rationality, cognitive biases, and nudging in public organizations. Public Administration Review, 79(3), 304- 320. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12994Behaviourally Informed Organizations (BI-Org). (2019). About the partnership. https://www.biorgpartnership.com/the-project-fullBenartzi, S., Beshears, J., Milkman, K. L., Sunstein, C. R., Thaler, R. H., Shankar, M., Tucker-Ray, W., Congdon, W.J., & Galing, S. (2017). Should governments invest more in nudging? Psychological Science, 28(8), 1041-1055. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617702501Benson, B., & Manoogian, J. (2021, Sep 30). The Cognitive Bias Codex-180+ biases. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Cognitive_Bias_Codex_-_180%2B_biases,_designed_by_John_Manoogian_III_(jm3).pngBerg, N. (2014). The consistency and ecological rationality approaches to normative bounded rationality. Journal of Economic Methodology, 21(4), 375-395. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2014.969910BEworks. (2020). Our approach. https://beworks.com/what-we-do/#our-approachBusiness Insights Unit. (2016). Behavioural insights in NSW: Update report 2016. Department of Premier and Cabinet (NSW). https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2016-12/apo-nid181236.pdfCamerer, C. F., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). Behavioral economics: past, present, future. In C.F. Camerer, G. Loewenstein, & M. Rabin (Eds.), Advances in Behavioral Economics (pp. 3-52). Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400829118-004Clarivate (2021, Jan 21): Web of Science. http://apps.webofknowledge.com/Digital Science & Research Solutions Inc. (2021, Jan 21). Dimensions. https://app.dimensions.ai/Ekelund Jr, R. B., & Hébert, R. F. (2006). A History of Economic Theory and Method. Waveland Press.Gawlowski, R. (2019). Behavioral Insights as a New Generation of Public Service Delivery. Polish Political Science Yearbook, 48(2), 319-329. https://doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2019208Geiger, N. (2017). The rise of behavioral economics: A quantitative assessment. Social Science History, 41(3), 555-583. https://doi.org/10.1017/ssh.2017.17Halpern, D. (2015). Inside the nudge unit: How small changes can make a big difference. Random House.Hummel, D., & Maedche, A. (2019). How effective is nudging? A quantitative review on the effect sizes and limits of empirical nudging studies. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 80, 47-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2019.03.005Jones, O. D. (2018). Why behavioral economics isn’t better, and how it could be. In J.C. Teitelbaum & K. Zeiler (Eds.), Research Handbook on Behavioral Law and Economics (pp. 476-504). Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849805681.00028Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 363-391. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185Kahneman, D., Wakker, P. P., & Sarin, R. (1997). Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 375-406. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355397555235Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. Penguin Books.Katona, G. (1951). Psychological analysis of economic behavior. McGraw-Hill Book Company.Maialeh, R. (2019). Generalization of results and neoclassical rationality: unresolved controversies of behavioural economics methodology. Quality & Quantity, 53(4), 1743-1761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-019-00837-1OECD. (2017). Behavioural Insights and Public Policy Lessons from Around the World. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/behavioural-insights- and-public-policy_9789264270480-enOECD. (2019). Behavioural insights. https://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/behavioural-insights.htmPesendorfer, W. (2006). Behavioral economics comes of age: A review essay on advances in behavioral economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 44(3), 712-721. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.44.3.712Ricardo, D. (2018). The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. In J.L. Simon (Ed.), The Economics of Population: Classic Writings (pp. 65-68). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351291521-9Roberto, C. A., & Kawachi, I. (2015). Behavioral Economics & Public Health. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199398331.001.0001Rotman School of Management. (2020). Behavioral Economic in Action. https://www.rotman.utoronto.ca/FacultyAndResearch/ResearchCentres/BEAR.Schmidt, A. T., & Engelen, B. (2020). The ethics of nudging: An overview. Philosophy Compass, 15(4), e12658. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12658Simon, H. A. (1955). A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99-118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852Smith, A. (1937). The wealth of nations [1776] (Vol. 11937).Smith, A. (2010). The theory of moral sentiments. Penguin. https://doi. org/10.1002/9781118011690.ch10Smith, T. G. (2016). Is behavioural economics ready to save the world? The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, 4(12), 982. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30060-2Sunstein, C. R. (2018). Nudging: a very short guide. In B. van der Sloot & A. de Groot (Eds.), The Handbook of Privacy Studies (pp. 173-180). Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9789048540136Terziev, V., & Kanev, D. (2018). Modern developments in behavioral economics. In The International Science and Technology Conference “FarEast-on” (pp. 10-23). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15577-3_2Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University Press.Thaler, R. H. (2016). Behavioral economics: Past, present, and future. American Economic Review, 106(7), 1577-1600. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.106.7.1577The Behavioural Insights Team. (2014). EAST. Four Simple Ways to Apply Behavioural Insights. https://www.bi.team/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/BIT-Publication-EAST_FA_WEB.pdfThe Decision Lab. (2020, Sep 30). Biases. https://thedecisionlab.com/biases.Iñaki Aliende, Lorenzo Escot - 2022info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0https://revfinypolecon.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/4002behavioral economicsnudge unitscognitive biasbounded rationalitymethodological frameworkeconomic doctrinesprospect theoryeconomía del comportamientounidades de empujesesgo cognitivoracionalidad limitadamarco metodológicodoctrinas económicasteoría de la perspectiva¿Por qué los responsables políticos y los científicos sociales deberían adoptar la economía del comportamiento? Un análisis para el periodo 2000-2020Why Policymakers and Social Scientists Should Adopt Behavioral Economics: An Analysis for the Period 2000-2020Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2744https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/8e35ace8-9c1d-4243-9606-6fc4155b110c/download31ff8c21c2f14874566a779b195c46a7MD5110983/29460oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/294602023-03-24 16:31:25.832https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0Iñaki Aliende, Lorenzo Escot - 2022https://repository.ucatolica.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaCbdigital@metabiblioteca.com

¿Por qué los responsables políticos y los científicos sociales deberían adoptar la economía del comportamiento? Un análisis para el periodo 2000-2020

Publicaciones similares