Comparación de la salud subjetiva entre prototipos de personalidad recuperados en población general de México
El objetivo de este estudio fue obtener prototipos de personalidad en población general de México y comparar la salud subjetiva entre ellos. En total, participaron 994 individuos de 14 a 63 años de edad. Se evaluaron cinco rasgos de personalidad (Neuroticismo, Extraversión, Apertura, Responsabilidad...
- Autores:
-
Solís-Cámara, Pedro
Meda-Lara, Rosa Martha
Moreno-Jiménez, Bernardo
Palomera-Chávez, Andrés
Juárez-Rodríguez, Pedro
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2018
- Institución:
- Universidad Católica de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
- Idioma:
- eng
spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/15410
- Acceso en línea:
- http://hdl.handle.net/10983/15410
- Palabra clave:
- DISCIPLINADO
NO-RESILIENTE
PERSONALIDAD
PROTOTIPOS
RESILIENTE
SALUD
SELF DISCIPLINED
NON-RESILIENT
PERSONALITY
PROTOTYPES
RESILIENT
HEALTH
NÃO RESILIENTE
PERSONALIDADE
SAÚDE
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2017
| id |
UCATOLICA2_1ae5a19c3712e5afd13981d8b082e9f8 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/15410 |
| network_acronym_str |
UCATOLICA2 |
| network_name_str |
RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Comparación de la salud subjetiva entre prototipos de personalidad recuperados en población general de México |
| dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of subjective health between personality prototypes extracted from general population of Mexico Comparação da saúde subjetiva entre protótipos de personalidade em população geral do México |
| title |
Comparación de la salud subjetiva entre prototipos de personalidad recuperados en población general de México |
| spellingShingle |
Comparación de la salud subjetiva entre prototipos de personalidad recuperados en población general de México DISCIPLINADO NO-RESILIENTE PERSONALIDAD PROTOTIPOS RESILIENTE SALUD SELF DISCIPLINED NON-RESILIENT PERSONALITY PROTOTYPES RESILIENT HEALTH NÃO RESILIENTE PERSONALIDADE SAÚDE |
| title_short |
Comparación de la salud subjetiva entre prototipos de personalidad recuperados en población general de México |
| title_full |
Comparación de la salud subjetiva entre prototipos de personalidad recuperados en población general de México |
| title_fullStr |
Comparación de la salud subjetiva entre prototipos de personalidad recuperados en población general de México |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Comparación de la salud subjetiva entre prototipos de personalidad recuperados en población general de México |
| title_sort |
Comparación de la salud subjetiva entre prototipos de personalidad recuperados en población general de México |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Solís-Cámara, Pedro Meda-Lara, Rosa Martha Moreno-Jiménez, Bernardo Palomera-Chávez, Andrés Juárez-Rodríguez, Pedro |
| dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv |
Solís-Cámara, Pedro Meda-Lara, Rosa Martha Moreno-Jiménez, Bernardo Palomera-Chávez, Andrés Juárez-Rodríguez, Pedro |
| dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv |
DISCIPLINADO NO-RESILIENTE PERSONALIDAD PROTOTIPOS RESILIENTE SALUD SELF DISCIPLINED NON-RESILIENT PERSONALITY PROTOTYPES RESILIENT HEALTH NÃO RESILIENTE PERSONALIDADE SAÚDE |
| topic |
DISCIPLINADO NO-RESILIENTE PERSONALIDAD PROTOTIPOS RESILIENTE SALUD SELF DISCIPLINED NON-RESILIENT PERSONALITY PROTOTYPES RESILIENT HEALTH NÃO RESILIENTE PERSONALIDADE SAÚDE |
| description |
El objetivo de este estudio fue obtener prototipos de personalidad en población general de México y comparar la salud subjetiva entre ellos. En total, participaron 994 individuos de 14 a 63 años de edad. Se evaluaron cinco rasgos de personalidad (Neuroticismo, Extraversión, Apertura, Responsabilidad y Amabilidad) con el NEO-FFI, y la salud subjetiva con el GHQ-12 y una pregunta sobre el estado de salud. Para corroborar la consistencia de los prototipos se dividió la muestra en dos grupos de edad: joven (de 14 a 25 años) y maduro (de 26 a 63 años). Y como resultado se recuperaron tres prototipos en ambos grupos: las personas Resilientes -bajo neuroticismo y alto en el resto de los rasgos-, quienes tuvieron la mejor salud subjetiva; las No-Resilientes -alto neuroticismo y bajo en el resto de los rasgos-, que presentaron la peor salud subjetiva; y las personas Disciplinadas -alto en responsabilidad y promedio en los otros rasgos-, que presentaron una salud subjetiva intermedia en comparación con los otros prototipos. Finalmente, la autodisciplina y la resiliencia fueron los rasgos que discriminaron mejor la buena salud. Los hallazgos se discuten en términos de la generalización de prototipos a través de culturas. |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| dc.date.accessioned.spa.fl_str_mv |
2018-01-29T23:46:52Z |
| dc.date.available.spa.fl_str_mv |
2018-01-29T23:46:52Z |
| dc.date.issued.spa.fl_str_mv |
2018-01 |
| dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de revista |
| dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
| dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv |
Text |
| dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART |
| dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.citation.spa.fl_str_mv |
Solís-Cámara, P., Meda-Lara, R., Moreno-Jiménez, B., Palomera-Chávez, A., & Juárez-Rodríguez, P. (2017). Comparación de la salud subjetiva entre prototipos de personalidad recuperados en población general de México-Comparison of subjective health between personality prototypes extracted from general population of Mexico. Comparação da saúde subjetiva entre protótipos de personalidade em população geral do México. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 20(2). Recuperado de http://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/ojsucatolica/revistas_ucatolica/index.php/acta-colombiana-psicologia/article/view/1115 |
| dc.identifier.issn.spa.fl_str_mv |
0123-9155 |
| dc.identifier.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10983/15410 |
| identifier_str_mv |
Solís-Cámara, P., Meda-Lara, R., Moreno-Jiménez, B., Palomera-Chávez, A., & Juárez-Rodríguez, P. (2017). Comparación de la salud subjetiva entre prototipos de personalidad recuperados en población general de México-Comparison of subjective health between personality prototypes extracted from general population of Mexico. Comparação da saúde subjetiva entre protótipos de personalidade em população geral do México. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 20(2). Recuperado de http://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/ojsucatolica/revistas_ucatolica/index.php/acta-colombiana-psicologia/article/view/1115 0123-9155 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10983/15410 |
| dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
eng spa |
| language |
eng spa |
| dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv |
Acta Colombiana de Psicología, Vol. 20, no. 2 (jul.-dic. 2017); p. 200-213 |
| dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv |
Akse, J., Hale, W. W. III, Engels, R. C. M. E., Raaijmakers, Q. A. W. & Meeus, W. H. J. (2004). Personality, perceived parental rejection and problem behavior in adolescence. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 39, 980–988. Akse, J., Hale, W. W. III., Engels, R. C. M. E., Raaijmakers, Q. A. W. & Meeus, W. H. J. (2007). Co-occurrence of depression and delinquency in personality types. European Journal of Personality, 21, 235–256. Alessandri, G., Vecchione, M., Donnellan, B. M., Eisenberg, N., Caprara G. V. & Cieciuch, J. (2014). On the cross-cultural replicability of the resilient, undercontrolled, and overcontrolled personality types. Journal of Personality, 82(4), 340–353. Asendorpf, J. B., Borkenau, P., Ostendorpf, F. & van Aken, M. A. G. (2001). Carving personality description at its joints: Confirmation of three replicable personality prototypes for both child and adults. EuropeanJournal of Personality , 15, 169-198. doi: 10.1002/per.408.G., Vecchione, M., Donnellan, B. M., Eisenberg, N., Caprara G. V. & Cieciuch, J. (2014). On the cross-cultural replicability of the resilient, undercontrolled, and overcontrolled personality types. Journal of Personality, 82(4), 340–353. Avdeyeva, T. V. & Church, A. T. (2005). The cross-cultural generalizability of personality types: A Philippine study. European Journal of Personality, 19, 475–499. Barbaranelli, C. (2002). Evaluating cluster analysis solutions: An application to the Italian NEO Personality Inventory. European Journal of Personality, 16, s43–s55. Boehm, B., Asendorpf, J. B. & Avia, M. D. (2002). Replicable types and subtypes of personality: Spanish NEO-PI samples. European Journal of Personality, 16, s25–s41. Borkenau, P., Hrebícková, M., Kuppens, P., Realo, A. & Allik, J. (2013). Sex differences in variability in personality: A study in four samples. Journal of Personality, 81(1), 49-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00784.x Caspi, A. (1998). Personality development accross the life course. En W. Damon, & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 311–388). New York: Wiley. Chapman, B. P. & Goldberg, L. G. (2011). Replicability and 40-year predictive power of childhood ARC types. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(3), 593–606. doi: 10.1037/a0024289 Costa, P. T. Jr. & McCrae, R. (2008). Inventario de personalidad NEO Revisado (NEO PI-R). Inventario NEO Reducido de Cinco Factores (NEO-FFI). Manual Profesional (3ra. edición revisada y ampliada). Madrid, España: TEA Ediciones S. A. Church, A. T. (2016). Personality traits across cultures. Current Opinion in Psychology, 8, 22-30. De Fruyt, F., Mervielde, I. & Van Leeuwen, K. (2002). The con sistency of personality type classification across samples and five-factor measures. EuropeanJournal of Personality , 16, s57-s72. doi: 10.1002/per.444. Díaz-Guerrero, R. (2012). Psicología del Mexicano. Descu brimiento de la etnopsicología (6ta. ed., reimpresión). México, DF: Trillas. Donnellan, M. B. & Robins, R. W. (2010). Resilient, overcon-trolled, and undercontrolled personality types: Issues and controversies. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 3, 1-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00313.x. Ekehammar, B. & Akrami, N. (2003). The relation between per sonality and prejudice: A variable- and a person-centered approach. EuropeanJournal of Personality , 17, 449-464. doi: 10.1002/per.494. García, O. Aluja, A. & García, L. F. (2004). Psychometric prop erties of the Goldberg's 50 Personality Markers for the Big Five Model: A study in Spanish language. European Jour nal of Psychological Assessment, 20(4), 310-319. Goldberg, D. P. & Williams, P. (1988). A user's guide to the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson. González, S., Tello, J., Silva, P., Lüders, C., Butelmann, S., Fristch, R., Solar, F., et al. (2012). Calidad de vida en pa cientes con discapacidad motora según factores sociode-mográficos y salud mental. Revista Chilena de Neuro-Psiquiatría, 50(1), 23-34. Hankins, M. (2008). The reliability of the twelve-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) under realistic assump tions. BMC Public Health, 8, 355. Hart, D., Burock, D., London, B., Atkins, R. & Bonilla-Santi-ago, G. (2005). The relation of personality types to physi ological, behavioural, and cognitive processes. EuropeanJournal of Personality , 19, 391-407. Hernández, R., Fernández, C. & Baptista, P. (2010). Metodología de la investigación. (5ta. ed.). Peru: McGraw-Hill. Herzberg, P. Y. (2009). Beyond ''accident-proneness": Using five-factor model prototypes to predict driving behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1096-1100. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.08.008. Herzberg, P. Y. & Roth, M. (2006). Beyond resilients, under-controllers, and overcontrollers? An extension of personal ity prototype research. EuropeanJournal of Personality , 20, 5-28. doi: 10.1002/per.557. Hoyle, R. H. (2010). Personality and self-regulation. En Rick H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of personality and self-regula tion (pp. 1-18). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. Isler, L., Liu, J. H., Sibley, C. G. & Fletcher, G. J. O. (2016). Self-Regulation and personality profiles: Empirical devel opment, longitudinal stability and predictive ability. Euro peanJournal of Personality , 30(3), 274-287. doi: 10.1002/per.2054. Kaleta, D., Polariska, K., Dziankowska-Zaborszcsyk, E., Han ke, W. & Drygas, W. (2009). Factors influencing self-per ception of health status. Central European Journal of Pub lic Health, 17(3), 122-127. Kinnunen, M. L., Metsäpelto, R. L., Feldt, T., Kokko, K., Tolvanen, A., Kinnunen, U., Leppänen, E., et al. (2012). Personality profiles and health: Longitudinal evidence among Finnish adults. Scandinavian Journal of Psychol ogy 53, 512-522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.14679450.2012.00969.x. Klimstra, T. A., Hale, W. W.. III, Raaijmakers, Q. A. W., Branje, S. J. T. & Meeus, W. H. J. (2010). A developmental typol ogy of adolescent personality. European Journal of Person ality, 24, 309-323. Lahey, B. B. (2009). Public health significance of neuroticism. American Psychologist, 64, 241-256. Martínez, P. & Cassaretto, M. (2011). Validación del Inventario de los Cinco Factores NEO-FFI en español en estudiantes universitarios peruanos. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 28, 63-74. Meda Lara, R. M., Moreno-Jiménez, B., García, L. F., Palomera Chávez, A. & Mariscal de Santiago, M. V. (2015). Validez factorial del NEO-FFI en una muestra mexicana: propuesta de una versión reducida. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 32(1), 57-67. McDowell, I. (2006). Measuring health - a guide to rating scales and questionnaires (3aed.). New York: Oxford Press. Miller, J. D. (2012). Five-factor model personality disorder pro totypes: A review of their development, validity, and com parison to alternative approaches. Journal of Personality , 80(6), 1565-1591. Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N., Shiner, R., Caspi, A. & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 313-345. Robins, R. W., John, O. P., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E. & Stoutham-er-Loeber, M. (1996). Resilient, overcontrolled, and under-controlled boys: Three replicable personality types. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 157-171. Roth, M. & von Collani, G. (2007). A head-to-head comparison of big five types and traits in the prediction of social atti tudes: Further evidence for a five-cluster typology. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 138-149. Sánchez-López, M. P. & Dresch, V. (2008). The 12-item Gen eral Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12): Reliability, external validity and factor structure in the Spanish population. Psicothema, 20(4), 839-843. Smith, T. W., Williams, P. G. & Segerstrom, S. C. (2015). Per sonality and physical health. En M. Mikulincer & P. R. Sha ver (Editors-in-Chief), Handbook of personality and social psychology: Vol. 4. Personality processes and individual differences (pp. 639-661. Washington: American Psycho logical Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/14343-029. Smith, A. B., Oluboyede, Y., West, R., Hewison, J. & House, A. O. (2013). The factor structure of the GHQ-12: the interac tion between item phrasing, variance and levels of distress. Quality of Life Research, 22, 145-152. Sociedad Mexicana de Psicología. (2007). Código Ético del Psicólogo. México: Trillas. Solís-Cámara, P., Meda Lara, R. M., Moreno-Jiménez, B. & Juárez, P. (2016). Estructura factorial del Cuestionario de Salud General GHQ-12 en población general de México. Salud & Sociedad, 7(1), 62-76. Steca, P., Alessandri, G. & Caprara, G. V. (2010). The utility of a well-known personality typology in studying successful aging: Resilients, undercontrollers, and overcontrollers in old age. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 442- 446. Steinley, D. (2003). Local optima in K-means clustering: What you don't know may hurt you. Psychological Methods, 8, 294-304. Strus, W., Cieciuch, J. & Rowinski, T. (2014). The circumplex of personality metatraits: A synthesizing model of personal ity based on the big five. Review of General Psychology 18, (4), 273-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000017. Tuuliainen/Kirsi Sipilä, L., Mäki, P., Könönen, M. & Suominen, A. L. (2015). Association between clinical signs of tempo-romandibular disorders and psychological distress among an adult Finnish population. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain andHeadache, 29(4), 370-377. doi: 10.11607/ofph.1439. Urzúa, A., Caqueo-Urízar, A., Bargsted, M. & Irarrázaval, M. (2015). ¿Afecta la forma de puntuación la estructura facto rial de GHQ-12? Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 31(6), 1305- 1312. Van Leeuwen, K., De Fruyt, F. & Mervielde, I. (2004). A lon gitudinal study of the utility of the resilient, overcontro-lled, and undercontrolled personality types as predictors of children's and adolescents' problem behavior. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 210-220. Reco vered from http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/pp/01650254. html. Weir, R. C. & Gjerde, P. F. (2002). Preschool personality pro totypes: Internal coherence, cross-study replicability, and developmental outcomes in adolescence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1229-1241. Xie, X., Chen,W., Lei, L., Xing, C. & Zhang, Y. (2016). The relationship between personality types and prosocial beha vior and aggression in Chinese adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences , 95, 56-61. Zawadzki, B. & Strelau, J. (2003). Trzy podstawowe typy czy cztery struktury temperamentu? [Three basic types or four structures of temperament?]. Czasopismo Psychologiczne, 6, 271-285. |
| dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv |
Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2017 |
| dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.rights.creativecommons.spa.fl_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) |
| dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2017 Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Católica de Colombia. Facultad de Psicología |
| institution |
Universidad Católica de Colombia |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/727c275b-bcd5-4430-8d89-3672e4abe584/download https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/67338eec-8e3c-4700-96cf-fb3d5171a042/download https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/5fa654c8-6bd5-486d-8811-aa60a075dd8e/download https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/513d6c34-1148-4fd1-9978-b53f10f6cfaa/download https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/6f7d60ff-a0d6-464c-96e9-71dc702b8835/download https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/cd0131e3-0e40-4faa-88ef-dbf173131b81/download |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
142ae6edd9c503848b372b27d7c1244f 695e44561cb8e98d0cd554f03df93699 c8ae763ecab704a74101f4fdee73a038 48b1e4591d9a14c7624967a4131dfa49 1d714654303b249e8297d34087967cca 1485e1946c1604fd4584d81e17d1bfdf |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaC |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdigital@metabiblioteca.com |
| _version_ |
1814256289431158784 |
| spelling |
Solís-Cámara, Pedro0531a0ed-12d8-43f8-a92b-ce89e7567759-1Meda-Lara, Rosa Martha9d5be81c-650b-4be3-9bf7-7fb6ab99684e-1Moreno-Jiménez, Bernardo08c97e86-44cb-4c3c-a283-a0387cbdd1e9-1Palomera-Chávez, Andrés03ce2eb9-a87b-4433-990c-ed9cb9199e18-1Juárez-Rodríguez, Pedro0c0ebe86-dad2-4d8f-8e99-cb8bb6abc258-12018-01-29T23:46:52Z2018-01-29T23:46:52Z2018-01El objetivo de este estudio fue obtener prototipos de personalidad en población general de México y comparar la salud subjetiva entre ellos. En total, participaron 994 individuos de 14 a 63 años de edad. Se evaluaron cinco rasgos de personalidad (Neuroticismo, Extraversión, Apertura, Responsabilidad y Amabilidad) con el NEO-FFI, y la salud subjetiva con el GHQ-12 y una pregunta sobre el estado de salud. Para corroborar la consistencia de los prototipos se dividió la muestra en dos grupos de edad: joven (de 14 a 25 años) y maduro (de 26 a 63 años). Y como resultado se recuperaron tres prototipos en ambos grupos: las personas Resilientes -bajo neuroticismo y alto en el resto de los rasgos-, quienes tuvieron la mejor salud subjetiva; las No-Resilientes -alto neuroticismo y bajo en el resto de los rasgos-, que presentaron la peor salud subjetiva; y las personas Disciplinadas -alto en responsabilidad y promedio en los otros rasgos-, que presentaron una salud subjetiva intermedia en comparación con los otros prototipos. Finalmente, la autodisciplina y la resiliencia fueron los rasgos que discriminaron mejor la buena salud. Los hallazgos se discuten en términos de la generalización de prototipos a través de culturas.The objective of this study was to extract personality prototypes from general population of Mexico and to compare subjective health indicators between these prototypes. Participants were 994 individuals (aged 14 to 63 years). Five personality traits (Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness, Conscientiousness, and Agreeableness) were assessed with the NEO-FFI. Subjective indicators of health (self-rated health and psychological distress) were assessed with a question regarding health status and the GHQ-12. To verify the consistency of the prototypes, the sample was divided into two age groups, young (14 to 25 years) and mature (26 to 63 years.). Three stable prototypes were recovered from both groups. Resilient individuals (low neuroticism and high in other traits) had the best subjective health; the Non-Resilient individuals (high neuroticism and low in other traits) had the worst subjective health; and Self-Disciplined individuals (high conscientiousness and medium scores in other traits) were in the middle of these extremes in subjective health. Self-discipline and resilience were most discriminative in terms of subjective health. Findings are discussed in terms of the generalization of prototypes across cultures.O objetivo deste estudo foi obter protótipos da personalidade em população geral do México e comparar a saúde subjetiva entre eles. No total, participaram 994 indivíduos de 14 a 63 anos. Avaliaram-se cinco traços de personalidade (extroversão, neuroticismo, abertura à experiência, conscienciosidade e amabilidade) com o NEO-FFI, e a saúde subjetiva com o GHQ-12, e uma pergunta sobre o estado de saúde. Para corroborar a consistência dos protótipos, dividiu-se a amostra em dois grupos de idade: jovem (de 14 a 25 anos) e adulto (de 26 a 63 anos). Como resultado, obtiveram-se três protótipos em ambos os grupos: as pessoas resilientes -baixo neuroticismo e alto nos demais traços-, os que tiveram a melhor saúde subjetiva; as não resilientes -alto neuroticismo e baixo no restante dos traços-, que apresentaram a pior saúde subjetiva, e as pessoas disciplinadas -alto em conscienciosidade e média nos outros traços-, que apresentaram uma saúde subjetiva intermediária em comparação com os outros protótipos. Finalmente, a autodisciplina e a resiliência foram os traços que melhor discriminaram a boa saúde. Os achados são discutidos em termos da generalização de protótipos através de culturas.application/pdfSolís-Cámara, P., Meda-Lara, R., Moreno-Jiménez, B., Palomera-Chávez, A., & Juárez-Rodríguez, P. (2017). Comparación de la salud subjetiva entre prototipos de personalidad recuperados en población general de México-Comparison of subjective health between personality prototypes extracted from general population of Mexico. Comparação da saúde subjetiva entre protótipos de personalidade em população geral do México. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 20(2). Recuperado de http://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/ojsucatolica/revistas_ucatolica/index.php/acta-colombiana-psicologia/article/view/11150123-9155http://hdl.handle.net/10983/15410engspaUniversidad Católica de Colombia. Facultad de PsicologíaActa Colombiana de Psicología, Vol. 20, no. 2 (jul.-dic. 2017); p. 200-213Akse, J., Hale, W. W. III, Engels, R. C. M. E., Raaijmakers, Q. A. W. & Meeus, W. H. J. (2004). Personality, perceived parental rejection and problem behavior in adolescence. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 39, 980–988.Akse, J., Hale, W. W. III., Engels, R. C. M. E., Raaijmakers, Q. A. W. & Meeus, W. H. J. (2007). Co-occurrence of depression and delinquency in personality types. European Journal of Personality, 21, 235–256.Alessandri, G., Vecchione, M., Donnellan, B. M., Eisenberg, N., Caprara G. V. & Cieciuch, J. (2014). On the cross-cultural replicability of the resilient, undercontrolled, and overcontrolled personality types. Journal of Personality, 82(4), 340–353.Asendorpf, J. B., Borkenau, P., Ostendorpf, F. & van Aken, M. A. G. (2001). Carving personality description at its joints: Confirmation of three replicable personality prototypes for both child and adults. EuropeanJournal of Personality , 15, 169-198. doi: 10.1002/per.408.G., Vecchione, M., Donnellan, B. M., Eisenberg, N., Caprara G. V. & Cieciuch, J. (2014). On the cross-cultural replicability of the resilient, undercontrolled, and overcontrolled personality types. Journal of Personality, 82(4), 340–353.Avdeyeva, T. V. & Church, A. T. (2005). The cross-cultural generalizability of personality types: A Philippine study. European Journal of Personality, 19, 475–499.Barbaranelli, C. (2002). Evaluating cluster analysis solutions: An application to the Italian NEO Personality Inventory. European Journal of Personality, 16, s43–s55.Boehm, B., Asendorpf, J. B. & Avia, M. D. (2002). Replicable types and subtypes of personality: Spanish NEO-PI samples. European Journal of Personality, 16, s25–s41.Borkenau, P., Hrebícková, M., Kuppens, P., Realo, A. & Allik, J. (2013). Sex differences in variability in personality: A study in four samples. Journal of Personality, 81(1), 49-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00784.xCaspi, A. (1998). Personality development accross the life course. En W. Damon, & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 311–388). New York: Wiley.Chapman, B. P. & Goldberg, L. G. (2011). Replicability and 40-year predictive power of childhood ARC types. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(3), 593–606. doi: 10.1037/a0024289Costa, P. T. Jr. & McCrae, R. (2008). Inventario de personalidad NEO Revisado (NEO PI-R). Inventario NEO Reducido de Cinco Factores (NEO-FFI). Manual Profesional (3ra. edición revisada y ampliada). Madrid, España: TEA Ediciones S. A.Church, A. T. (2016). Personality traits across cultures. Current Opinion in Psychology, 8, 22-30.De Fruyt, F., Mervielde, I. & Van Leeuwen, K. (2002). The con sistency of personality type classification across samples and five-factor measures. EuropeanJournal of Personality , 16, s57-s72. doi: 10.1002/per.444.Díaz-Guerrero, R. (2012). Psicología del Mexicano. Descu brimiento de la etnopsicología (6ta. ed., reimpresión). México, DF: Trillas.Donnellan, M. B. & Robins, R. W. (2010). Resilient, overcon-trolled, and undercontrolled personality types: Issues and controversies. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 3, 1-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00313.x.Ekehammar, B. & Akrami, N. (2003). The relation between per sonality and prejudice: A variable- and a person-centered approach. EuropeanJournal of Personality , 17, 449-464. doi: 10.1002/per.494.García, O. Aluja, A. & García, L. F. (2004). Psychometric prop erties of the Goldberg's 50 Personality Markers for the Big Five Model: A study in Spanish language. European Jour nal of Psychological Assessment, 20(4), 310-319.Goldberg, D. P. & Williams, P. (1988). A user's guide to the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.González, S., Tello, J., Silva, P., Lüders, C., Butelmann, S., Fristch, R., Solar, F., et al. (2012). Calidad de vida en pa cientes con discapacidad motora según factores sociode-mográficos y salud mental. Revista Chilena de Neuro-Psiquiatría, 50(1), 23-34.Hankins, M. (2008). The reliability of the twelve-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) under realistic assump tions. BMC Public Health, 8, 355.Hart, D., Burock, D., London, B., Atkins, R. & Bonilla-Santi-ago, G. (2005). The relation of personality types to physi ological, behavioural, and cognitive processes. EuropeanJournal of Personality , 19, 391-407.Hernández, R., Fernández, C. & Baptista, P. (2010). Metodología de la investigación. (5ta. ed.). Peru: McGraw-Hill.Herzberg, P. Y. (2009). Beyond ''accident-proneness": Using five-factor model prototypes to predict driving behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1096-1100. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.08.008.Herzberg, P. Y. & Roth, M. (2006). Beyond resilients, under-controllers, and overcontrollers? An extension of personal ity prototype research. EuropeanJournal of Personality , 20, 5-28. doi: 10.1002/per.557.Hoyle, R. H. (2010). Personality and self-regulation. En Rick H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of personality and self-regula tion (pp. 1-18). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Isler, L., Liu, J. H., Sibley, C. G. & Fletcher, G. J. O. (2016). Self-Regulation and personality profiles: Empirical devel opment, longitudinal stability and predictive ability. Euro peanJournal of Personality , 30(3), 274-287. doi: 10.1002/per.2054.Kaleta, D., Polariska, K., Dziankowska-Zaborszcsyk, E., Han ke, W. & Drygas, W. (2009). Factors influencing self-per ception of health status. Central European Journal of Pub lic Health, 17(3), 122-127.Kinnunen, M. L., Metsäpelto, R. L., Feldt, T., Kokko, K., Tolvanen, A., Kinnunen, U., Leppänen, E., et al. (2012). Personality profiles and health: Longitudinal evidence among Finnish adults. Scandinavian Journal of Psychol ogy 53, 512-522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.14679450.2012.00969.x.Klimstra, T. A., Hale, W. W.. III, Raaijmakers, Q. A. W., Branje, S. J. T. & Meeus, W. H. J. (2010). A developmental typol ogy of adolescent personality. European Journal of Person ality, 24, 309-323.Lahey, B. B. (2009). Public health significance of neuroticism. American Psychologist, 64, 241-256.Martínez, P. & Cassaretto, M. (2011). Validación del Inventario de los Cinco Factores NEO-FFI en español en estudiantes universitarios peruanos. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 28, 63-74.Meda Lara, R. M., Moreno-Jiménez, B., García, L. F., Palomera Chávez, A. & Mariscal de Santiago, M. V. (2015). Validez factorial del NEO-FFI en una muestra mexicana: propuesta de una versión reducida. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 32(1), 57-67.McDowell, I. (2006). Measuring health - a guide to rating scales and questionnaires (3aed.). New York: Oxford Press.Miller, J. D. (2012). Five-factor model personality disorder pro totypes: A review of their development, validity, and com parison to alternative approaches. Journal of Personality , 80(6), 1565-1591.Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N., Shiner, R., Caspi, A. & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 313-345.Robins, R. W., John, O. P., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E. & Stoutham-er-Loeber, M. (1996). Resilient, overcontrolled, and under-controlled boys: Three replicable personality types. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 157-171.Roth, M. & von Collani, G. (2007). A head-to-head comparison of big five types and traits in the prediction of social atti tudes: Further evidence for a five-cluster typology. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 138-149.Sánchez-López, M. P. & Dresch, V. (2008). The 12-item Gen eral Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12): Reliability, external validity and factor structure in the Spanish population. Psicothema, 20(4), 839-843.Smith, T. W., Williams, P. G. & Segerstrom, S. C. (2015). Per sonality and physical health. En M. Mikulincer & P. R. Sha ver (Editors-in-Chief), Handbook of personality and social psychology: Vol. 4. Personality processes and individual differences (pp. 639-661. Washington: American Psycho logical Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/14343-029.Smith, A. B., Oluboyede, Y., West, R., Hewison, J. & House, A. O. (2013). The factor structure of the GHQ-12: the interac tion between item phrasing, variance and levels of distress. Quality of Life Research, 22, 145-152.Sociedad Mexicana de Psicología. (2007). Código Ético del Psicólogo. México: Trillas.Solís-Cámara, P., Meda Lara, R. M., Moreno-Jiménez, B. & Juárez, P. (2016). Estructura factorial del Cuestionario de Salud General GHQ-12 en población general de México. Salud & Sociedad, 7(1), 62-76.Steca, P., Alessandri, G. & Caprara, G. V. (2010). The utility of a well-known personality typology in studying successful aging: Resilients, undercontrollers, and overcontrollers in old age. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 442- 446.Steinley, D. (2003). Local optima in K-means clustering: What you don't know may hurt you. Psychological Methods, 8, 294-304.Strus, W., Cieciuch, J. & Rowinski, T. (2014). The circumplex of personality metatraits: A synthesizing model of personal ity based on the big five. Review of General Psychology 18, (4), 273-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000017.Tuuliainen/Kirsi Sipilä, L., Mäki, P., Könönen, M. & Suominen, A. L. (2015). Association between clinical signs of tempo-romandibular disorders and psychological distress among an adult Finnish population. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain andHeadache, 29(4), 370-377. doi: 10.11607/ofph.1439.Urzúa, A., Caqueo-Urízar, A., Bargsted, M. & Irarrázaval, M. (2015). ¿Afecta la forma de puntuación la estructura facto rial de GHQ-12? Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 31(6), 1305- 1312.Van Leeuwen, K., De Fruyt, F. & Mervielde, I. (2004). A lon gitudinal study of the utility of the resilient, overcontro-lled, and undercontrolled personality types as predictors of children's and adolescents' problem behavior. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 210-220. Reco vered from http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/pp/01650254. html.Weir, R. C. & Gjerde, P. F. (2002). Preschool personality pro totypes: Internal coherence, cross-study replicability, and developmental outcomes in adolescence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1229-1241.Xie, X., Chen,W., Lei, L., Xing, C. & Zhang, Y. (2016). The relationship between personality types and prosocial beha vior and aggression in Chinese adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences , 95, 56-61.Zawadzki, B. & Strelau, J. (2003). Trzy podstawowe typy czy cztery struktury temperamentu? [Three basic types or four structures of temperament?]. Czasopismo Psychologiczne, 6, 271-285.Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2017info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2DISCIPLINADONO-RESILIENTEPERSONALIDADPROTOTIPOSRESILIENTESALUDSELF DISCIPLINEDNON-RESILIENTPERSONALITYPROTOTYPESRESILIENTHEALTHNÃO RESILIENTEPERSONALIDADESAÚDEComparación de la salud subjetiva entre prototipos de personalidad recuperados en población general de MéxicoComparison of subjective health between personality prototypes extracted from general population of MexicoComparação da saúde subjetiva entre protótipos de personalidade em população geral do MéxicoArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85PublicationORIGINALComparación de la Salud Subjetiva.pdfComparación de la Salud Subjetiva.pdfArtículo en españolapplication/pdf826069https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/727c275b-bcd5-4430-8d89-3672e4abe584/download142ae6edd9c503848b372b27d7c1244fMD51Comparison of subjective health.pdfComparison of subjective health.pdfArtículo en inglesapplication/pdf814615https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/67338eec-8e3c-4700-96cf-fb3d5171a042/download695e44561cb8e98d0cd554f03df93699MD52TEXTComparación de la Salud Subjetiva.pdf.txtComparación de la Salud Subjetiva.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain67431https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/5fa654c8-6bd5-486d-8811-aa60a075dd8e/downloadc8ae763ecab704a74101f4fdee73a038MD53Comparison of subjective health.pdf.txtComparison of subjective health.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain63310https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/513d6c34-1148-4fd1-9978-b53f10f6cfaa/download48b1e4591d9a14c7624967a4131dfa49MD55THUMBNAILComparación de la Salud Subjetiva.pdf.jpgComparación de la Salud Subjetiva.pdf.jpgRIUCACimage/jpeg4382https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/6f7d60ff-a0d6-464c-96e9-71dc702b8835/download1d714654303b249e8297d34087967ccaMD54Comparison of subjective health.pdf.jpgComparison of subjective health.pdf.jpgRIUCACimage/jpeg4378https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/cd0131e3-0e40-4faa-88ef-dbf173131b81/download1485e1946c1604fd4584d81e17d1bfdfMD5610983/15410oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/154102023-03-24 16:08:27.019https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2017https://repository.ucatolica.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaCbdigital@metabiblioteca.com |