Adaptación y validación de la Escala Disposicional de Empatía Positiva a población adolescente argentina

La empatía positiva implica una expresión de felicidad o alegría, la cual es resultado de comprender la condición emocional positiva de otra persona y compartirla. El objetivo de esta investigación fue evaluar las propiedades psicométricas de la adaptación de la Escala Disposicional de Empatía Posit...

Full description

Autores:
Hess, Carina
Mesurado, Belén
Tipo de recurso:
Article of investigation
Fecha de publicación:
2022
Institución:
Universidad Católica de Colombia
Repositorio:
RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/28564
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2023.26.1.3
Palabra clave:
adaptation
empathy
prosocial behavior
adolescence
adaptación
empatía
conducta prosocial
adolescencia
Rights
openAccess
License
Acta Colombiana de Psicología - 2022
id UCATOLICA2_1a77f2aa4dadc7b2d4813f35ab75805b
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/28564
network_acronym_str UCATOLICA2
network_name_str RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Adaptación y validación de la Escala Disposicional de Empatía Positiva a población adolescente argentina
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv Adaptation and Validation of the Dispositional Positive Empathy Scale to the Argentine Adolescent Population
title Adaptación y validación de la Escala Disposicional de Empatía Positiva a población adolescente argentina
spellingShingle Adaptación y validación de la Escala Disposicional de Empatía Positiva a población adolescente argentina
adaptation
empathy
prosocial behavior
adolescence
adaptación
empatía
conducta prosocial
adolescencia
title_short Adaptación y validación de la Escala Disposicional de Empatía Positiva a población adolescente argentina
title_full Adaptación y validación de la Escala Disposicional de Empatía Positiva a población adolescente argentina
title_fullStr Adaptación y validación de la Escala Disposicional de Empatía Positiva a población adolescente argentina
title_full_unstemmed Adaptación y validación de la Escala Disposicional de Empatía Positiva a población adolescente argentina
title_sort Adaptación y validación de la Escala Disposicional de Empatía Positiva a población adolescente argentina
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Hess, Carina
Mesurado, Belén
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Hess, Carina
Mesurado, Belén
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv adaptation
empathy
prosocial behavior
adolescence
topic adaptation
empathy
prosocial behavior
adolescence
adaptación
empatía
conducta prosocial
adolescencia
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv adaptación
empatía
conducta prosocial
adolescencia
description La empatía positiva implica una expresión de felicidad o alegría, la cual es resultado de comprender la condición emocional positiva de otra persona y compartirla. El objetivo de esta investigación fue evaluar las propiedades psicométricas de la adaptación de la Escala Disposicional de Empatía Positiva (Dispositional Positive Empathy Scale) en población adolescente argentina. El instrumento sobre el cual se realizó la adaptación está compuesto por siete ítems, originalmente en idioma inglés. La muestra (n = 303) estuvo conformada por 95 varones (31%) y 208 mujeres (69%), con edades entre 11 y 17 años, estudiantes de secundaria. Se estudió la validez de constructo realizando un análisis factorial confirmatorio y la invariancia de la escala en relación con el sexo y edad de los participantes. Se comprobó la validez convergente con la conducta prosocial hacia diversos objetivos, las diferencias de los niveles de empatía positiva entre los sexos y en distintos grupos de edad y los niveles de fiabilidad (Ω = .78). Los resultados indican que la escala es unidimensional, coincidiendo con la versión original. Se encontró un buen ajuste del modelo a los datos (cfi = .98; tli = .96; nnfi = .96; nfi = .95; rmsea = .05). El modelo permaneció constante en ambos sexos y grupos de edades. La empatía positiva se relacionó con la prosocialidad y se encontraron diferencias según sexo y edades. Los hallazgos dan cuenta de que las características psicométricas de la adaptación de la Escala Disposicional de Empatía Positiva a población adolescente argentina son satisfactorias.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-05 00:00:00
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-05 00:00:00
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-05
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv Journal article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.14718/ACP.2023.26.1.3
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 1909-9711
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0123-9155
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2023.26.1.3
identifier_str_mv 10.14718/ACP.2023.26.1.3
1909-9711
0123-9155
url https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2023.26.1.3
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/4210/4497
https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/4210/4406
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv Núm. 1 , Año 2023 : Acta Colombiana de Psicología
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv 44
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv 1
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv 27
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv 26
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv Acta Colombiana de Psicología
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv Andreoni, J., & Miller, J. (2002). Giving according to garp: An experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism. Econometrica, 70(2), 737-753. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00302 Batson, C. D., & Shaw, L. L. (1991). Evidence for altruism: Toward a pluralism of prosocial motives. Psychological Inquiry, 2(2), 107-122. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327 965pli0202_1 Batson, C. D., Batson, J. G., Slingsby, J. K., Harrell, K. L., Peekna, H. M., & Todd, R. M. (1991). Empathic joy and the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(3), 413-426. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.413 Brebner, J. (2003). Gender and emotions. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(3), 387-394. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00059-4 Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with amos: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203805534 Chaplin, T. M., & Aldao, A. (2013). Gender differences in emotion expression in children: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 139(4), 735-765. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030737 Clinton, A. J., & Pollini, R. A. (2021). Using positive empathy interventions to reduce stigma toward people who inject drugs. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 616729. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.616729 Cohn, M. A., Fredrickson, B. L., Brown, S. L., Mikels, J. A., & Conway, A.M. (2009). Happiness unpacked: Positive emotions increase life satisfaction by building resilience. Emotion, 9(3), 361-368. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015952 Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in Empathy. jsas Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85. https://www.uv.es/ friasnav/Davis_1980.pdf Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual-differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113-126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113 De Vignemont, F., & Singer, T. (2006). The empathic brain: How, when and why? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(10), 435-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tics.2006.08.008 De Weid, M., Goudena, P. P., & Matthys, W. (2005). Empathy in boys with disruptive behavior disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46(8), 867-880. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00389.x De Wied, M., Van Boxtel, A., Zaalberg, R., Goudena, P. P., & Matthys, W. (2006). Facial emg responses to Dynamic emotional facial expressions in boys with disruptive behavior disorders. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 40(2), 112-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jpsychires.2005.08.003 Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(2), 71-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582304267187 Decety, J., & Lamm, C. (2006). Human empathy through the lens of social neuroscience. The Scientific World Journal, 6, Article 280363, 1146-1163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/ tsw.2006.221 Domínguez-Lara, S. A. D., & Merino-Soto, C. M. (2015a). ¿Por qué es importante reportar los intervalos de confianza del coeficiente alfa de Cronbach? Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 13(2), 1326-1328. https://revistaumanizales.cinde.org. co/rlcsnj/index.php/Revista-Latinoamericana/article/download/2030/629 Domínguez-Lara, S. A. D., & Merino-Soto, C. M. (2015b). Sobre el reporte de confiabilidad del Clarp-tdah, de Salamanca (2010). Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 13(2), 1316-1319. Duan, C. (2000). Being empathic: The role of motivation to empathize and the nature of target emotions. Motivation and Emotion, 24(1), 29-49. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005587525609 Eisenberg, N. (2000). Empathy and Sympathy. En M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of Emotions (2a ed., pp. 677-691). Guilford. Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Prosocial development. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., Vol. 3., pp. 646-718). John Wiley. Eisenberg, N., & Lennon J. (1983). Sex differences in empathy and related capacities. Psychological Bulletin, 94(1), 100-131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.94.1.100 Escobedo Portillo, M. T., Hernández Gómez, J. A., Estebané Ortega, V., & Martínez Moreno, G. (2016). Modelos de ecuaciones estructurales: características, fases, construcción, aplicación y resultados. Ciencia & Trabajo, 18(55), 16-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/ S0718-24492016000100004 Ferrando, P. J., & Anguiano-Carrasco, C. (2010). El análisis factorial como técnica de investigación en psicología. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31(1), 18-33. https://www.pape lesdelpsicologo.es/pdf/1793.pdf Feshbach, N. D., & Feshbach, S. (1969). The relationship between empathy and aggression in two age groups. Developmental Psychology, 1, 102-107. https://doi.org/10.1037/H0027016 Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218- 226. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218 Fredrickson, B. L., Cohn, M. A., Coffey, K. A., Pek, J., & Finkel, S. M. (2008). Open hearts build lives: Positive emotions, induced through loving-kindness meditation, build consequential personal resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1045-1062. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013262 Gable, S. L., Reis, H. T., Impett, E. A., & Asher, E. R. (2004). What do you do when things go right? The intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits of sharing positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 228-245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.228 Gable, S. L., Gonzaga, G. C., & Strachman, A. (2006). Will you be there for me when things go right? Supportive responses to positive event disclosures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(5), 904-917. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.904 Gable, S. L., & Reis, H. T. (2010). Good News! Capitalizing on positive events in an interpersonal context. En M. P. Zanna & Olson, J. M. (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 195-257). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(10)42004-3 Ganegoda, D. B., & Bordia, P. (2019). I can be happy for you, but not all the time: A contingency model of envy and positive empathy in the workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(6), 776-795. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000377 Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson J. C. (1988). An update paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimentionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(2), 186-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378802500207 Goss-Sampson, M. (2019). Statistical analysis in jasp: A guide for students (2a ed.). University of Greenwich. https://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/25585/ Hambleton, R. (1993). Translating achievement tests for use in cross-national studies. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 9(1), 57-68. https://eric. ed.gov/?id=ED358128 Hambleton, R. (1994). Guidelines for adapting educational and psychological test: A progress report. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 10, 229-244. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED399291.pdf Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Adaptación de test para su uso en diferentes idiomas y culturas: fuentes de error, posibles soluciones y directrices prácticas. En J. Muníz (Ed.), Psicometría (pp. 209-238). Universitas. Hart, D., & Fegley, S. (1995). Prosocial behavior and caring in adolescence: Relations to self-understanding and social judgment. Child Development, 66(5), 1346-1359. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131651 Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, P. (2014). Metodología de la Investigación (6a ed.). McGraw-Hill; Interamericana Editores, S.A. Hicks, A. M., & Diamond, L. M. (2008). How was your day? Couples’ affect when telling and hearing daily events. Personal Relationships, 15(2), 205-228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2008.00194.x Jansen, E. (2021). Your success at work brings me joy or depression: Factors influencing the affective experiences of positive empathy and envy in meeting co-worker’s success [Tesis de maestría, University of Twente]. http://essay.utwente.nl/85567/1/Jansen%20MSc%20COM%20 Behavioural%20Management%20and%20Social%20 sciences.pdf Jiménez Martínez, J. (2017). Crianza, prosocialidad y relaciones entre los pares en la adolescencia. Factores implicados en los comportamientos antisociales [Tesis doctoral, Universitat de València]. https:// www.educacion.gob.es/teseo/imprimirFicheroTesis. do?idFichero=q%2BYBbnBLDP8%3D Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3a ed.). The Guilford Press. Lennon, R., Eisenberg, N., & Carroll, J. (1983). The assessment of empathy in early childhood. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 4(3), 295-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/0193-3973(83)90024-2 Light, S. N., Coan, J. A., Zahn-Waxler, C., Frye, C., Goldsmith, H. H., & Davidson, R. J. (2009). Empathy is associated with dynamic change in prefrontal brain electrical activity during positive emotion in children. Child Development, 80(4), 1210-1231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01326.x Light, S. N., Moran, Z. D., Zahn-Waxler, C., & Davidson, R. J. (2019). The measurement of positive valence forms of empathy and their relation to anhedonia and other depressive symptomatology. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 815. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00815 Llorca, A., Malonda, E., & Samper, P. (2017). Prosocial reasoning and emotions in young offenders and non-offenders. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 9(2), 65-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpal.2017.01.001 Liu, J., Qiao, X., Dong, F., & Raine, A. (2018). The Chinese version of the cognitive, affective, and somatic empathy scale for children: Validation, gender invariance and associated factors. PLoS one, 13(5), Article e0195268. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195268 McNeish, D. (2018). Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here. Psychological Methods, 23(3), 412-433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/met0000144 Mesurado, B. (2018, 6-9 de agosto). El rol de la empatía positiva y negativa en la conducta prosocial [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAWfbcGoqqg Mesurado, B., & Richaud, M. C. (2017). The relationship between parental variables, empathy and prosocial-flow with prosocial behavior toward strangers, friends, and family. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(3), 843-860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9748-7 Mesurado, B., Guerra, P., De Sanctis, F., & Rodriguez, L. M. (2019). Validation of the spanish version of the prosocial behavior toward different targets scale. International Social Work, 65(1), 175-186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872819858738 Mitchell, J. P. (2009). Inferences about mental states. Philosophical Transantions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 364(1521), 1309-1316. http://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0318 Montague, P. R., Berns, G. S., Cohen, J. D., McClure, S. M., Pagnoni, G., Dhamala, M., Wiest, M. C., Karpov, I., King, R. D., Apple, N., & Fisher, R. (2002). Hyperscanning: Simultaneous fmri during linked social interactions. NeuroImage, 16(4), 1159-1164. https://doi.org/10.1006/ nimg.2002.1150 Morelli, S. A., Lee, I. A., Arnn, M. E., & Zaki, J. (2015). Emotional and instrumental support provision interact to predict well-being. Emotion, 15(4), 484-493. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1037/emo0000084 Morelli, S. A., & Lieberman, M. D. (2013). The role of automaticity and attention in neural processes underlying empathy for happiness, sadness, and anxiety. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, Article 160. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00160 Morelli, S. A., Lieberman, M. D., Telzer, E. H., & Zaki, J. (En revisión). Positive empathy: Its structure and relation to prosociality, social connection, and well-being. Morelli, S. A., Lieberman, M. D., & Zaki, J. (2015). The emerging study of positive empathy. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(2), 57-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12157 Morelli, S. A., Rameson, L. T., & Lieberman, M. D. (2014). The neural components of empathy: Predicting daily prosocial behavior. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(1), 39-47. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss088 Morelli, S. A., Sacchet, M. D., & Zaki, J. (2015). Common and distinct neural correlates of personal and vicarious reward: A quantitative meta-analysis. NeuroImage, 112, 244-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.056 Nezlek, J. B., Feist, G. J., Wilson, F. C., & Plesko, R. M. (2001). Day-to-day variability in empathy as a function of daily events and mood. Journal of Research in Personality, 35(4), 401-423. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.2001.2332 Padilla-Walker, L. M., & Christensen, K. J. (2011). Empathy and self-regulation as mediators between parenting and adolescents’ prosocial behavior toward strangers, friends, and family. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(3), 545-551. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00695.x Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A classification and handbook. Oxford University Press; American Psychologicgal Association. Preston, S. D., & De Waal, F. B. M. (2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X02000018 Reis, H. T., Smith, S. M., Carmichael, C. L., Caprariello, P. A., Tsai, F.-F., Rodrigues, A., & Maniaci, M. R. (2010). Are you happy for me? How sharing positive events with others provides personal and interpersonal benefits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(2), 311-329. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018344 Roberts, W., & Strayer, J. (1996). Empathy, emotional expressiveness, and prosocial behavior. Child Development, 67(2), 449-470. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131826 Rodríguez, M. N., & Ruiz, M. A. (2008). Atenuación de la asimetría y de la curtosis de las puntuaciones observadas mediante transformaciones de variables: incidencia sobre la estructura factorial. Psicológica: Revista de Metodología y Psicología Experimental, 29(2), 205- 227. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo= 2718372 Roth-Hanania, R., Davidov, M., & Zahn-Waxler, C. (2011). Empathy development from 8 to 16 months: Early signs of concern for others. Infant Behavior & Development, 34(3), 447-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. infbeh.2011.04.007 Ruiz, M. A., Pardo, A., & San Martín, R. (2010). Modelos de ecuaciones estructurales. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31(1), 34-45. https://www.papelesdelpsicologo.es/pdf/1794.pdf Sallquist, J., Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., Eggum, N. D., & Gaertner, B. M. (2009). Assessment of preschoolers’ positive empathy: Concurrent and longitudinal relations with positive emotion, social competence, and sympathy. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(3), 223-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760902819444 Smith, K. D., Keating, J. P., & Stotland, E. (1989). Altruism reconsidered: The effect of denying feedback on a victim’s status to empathic witnesses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 641-650. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.641 Stern, J. A., & Cassidy, J. (2018). Empathy from infancy to adolescence: An attachment perspective on the development of individual differences. Developmental Review, 47, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2017.09 .002 Strayer, J. (1980). A naturalistic study of empathic behaviors and their relation to affective states and perspective taking skills in preschool children. Child Development, 51(3), 815-822. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129469 Strayer, J. (1993). Children’s concordant emotions and cognitions in response to observed emotions. Child Development, 64(1), 188-201. https://doi.org/10.2307/ 1131445 Telle, N. T., & Pfister, H. R. (2016). Positive Empathy and Prosocial Behavior: A neglected link. Emotion Review, 8(2), 154-163. https://doi. org/10.1177/1754073915586817 Vaish, A., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Sympathy through affective perspective taking and its relation to prosocial behavior in toddlers. Developmental Psychology, 45(2), 534-543. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014322 Wallace, B. A., & Shapiro, S. L. (2006). Mental balance and well-being: Building bridges between Buddhism and western psychology. American Psychologist, 61(7), 690- 701. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.690 Yue, T., Wei, J., Huang, X., & Jiang, Y. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Positive Empathy Scale among undergraduates. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 44(1), 131-138. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2016.44.1.131 Zahn-Waxler, C., Radke-Yarrow, M., Wagner, E., & Chapman, M. (1992). Development of concern for others. Developmental Psychology, 28(1), 126-136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.28.1.126 Zhou, Q., Eisenberg, N., Losoya, S. H., Fabes, R. A., Reiser, M., Guthrie, I. K., Murphy, B. C., Cumberland, A. J., & Shepard, S. A. (2002). The relations of parental warmth and positive expressiveness to children’s empathy related responding and social functioning: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 73(3), 893-915. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00446

dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv Acta Colombiana de Psicología - 2022
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
rights_invalid_str_mv Acta Colombiana de Psicología - 2022
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv text/html
application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Católica de Colombia
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/4210
institution Universidad Católica de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/8f6a75ba-9fc7-4f06-b3d7-57fae079bee3/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 99b3ba1c02942eda737ff9d380c90b04
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_ 1812183347405783040
spelling Hess, Carina049d2a79-3bc3-4786-bfcc-22d14cd208c1300Mesurado, Belénc0432e7a-f803-4071-b560-f21883ecf84b3002022-12-05 00:00:002022-12-05 00:00:002022-12-05La empatía positiva implica una expresión de felicidad o alegría, la cual es resultado de comprender la condición emocional positiva de otra persona y compartirla. El objetivo de esta investigación fue evaluar las propiedades psicométricas de la adaptación de la Escala Disposicional de Empatía Positiva (Dispositional Positive Empathy Scale) en población adolescente argentina. El instrumento sobre el cual se realizó la adaptación está compuesto por siete ítems, originalmente en idioma inglés. La muestra (n = 303) estuvo conformada por 95 varones (31%) y 208 mujeres (69%), con edades entre 11 y 17 años, estudiantes de secundaria. Se estudió la validez de constructo realizando un análisis factorial confirmatorio y la invariancia de la escala en relación con el sexo y edad de los participantes. Se comprobó la validez convergente con la conducta prosocial hacia diversos objetivos, las diferencias de los niveles de empatía positiva entre los sexos y en distintos grupos de edad y los niveles de fiabilidad (Ω = .78). Los resultados indican que la escala es unidimensional, coincidiendo con la versión original. Se encontró un buen ajuste del modelo a los datos (cfi = .98; tli = .96; nnfi = .96; nfi = .95; rmsea = .05). El modelo permaneció constante en ambos sexos y grupos de edades. La empatía positiva se relacionó con la prosocialidad y se encontraron diferencias según sexo y edades. Los hallazgos dan cuenta de que las características psicométricas de la adaptación de la Escala Disposicional de Empatía Positiva a población adolescente argentina son satisfactorias.Positive empathy implies an expression of happiness or joy, resulting from understanding the positive emotional condition of another person and sharing it. The aim of this research was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the adaptation of the Dispositional Positive Empathy Scale in the Argentine adolescent population. The instrument on which the adaptation was made consists of seven items, originally in English. The sample (n = 303) was made up of 95 males (31 %) and 208 females (69 %), aged between 11 and 17 years old, high school students. Construct validity was studied by performing a confirmatory factor analysis and the invariance of the scale in relation to the sex and age of the participants. Convergent validity was verified with prosocial behavior towards various goals, differences in levels of positive empathy between sexes and across different age groups, and reliability levels (Ω = .78) were tested. The results indicate that the scale is one-dimensional, coinciding with the original version. A good fit of the model to the data was found (cfi = .98; tli = .96; nnfi = .96; nfi = .95; rmsea = .05). The model remained constant across both sexes and age groups. Positive empathy was related to prosociality and differences were found according to sex and age. The findings show that the psychometric characteristics of the adaptation of the Positive Empathy Dispositional Scale to the Argentine adolescent population are satisfactory.text/htmlapplication/pdf10.14718/ACP.2023.26.1.31909-97110123-9155https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2023.26.1.3spaUniversidad Católica de Colombiahttps://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/4210/4497https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/4210/4406Núm. 1 , Año 2023 : Acta Colombiana de Psicología4412726Acta Colombiana de PsicologíaAndreoni, J., & Miller, J. (2002). Giving according to garp: An experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism. Econometrica, 70(2), 737-753. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00302 Batson, C. D., & Shaw, L. L. (1991). Evidence for altruism: Toward a pluralism of prosocial motives. Psychological Inquiry, 2(2), 107-122. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327 965pli0202_1 Batson, C. D., Batson, J. G., Slingsby, J. K., Harrell, K. L., Peekna, H. M., & Todd, R. M. (1991). Empathic joy and the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(3), 413-426. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.413 Brebner, J. (2003). Gender and emotions. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(3), 387-394. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00059-4 Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with amos: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203805534 Chaplin, T. M., & Aldao, A. (2013). Gender differences in emotion expression in children: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 139(4), 735-765. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030737 Clinton, A. J., & Pollini, R. A. (2021). Using positive empathy interventions to reduce stigma toward people who inject drugs. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 616729. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.616729 Cohn, M. A., Fredrickson, B. L., Brown, S. L., Mikels, J. A., & Conway, A.M. (2009). Happiness unpacked: Positive emotions increase life satisfaction by building resilience. Emotion, 9(3), 361-368. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015952 Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in Empathy. jsas Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85. https://www.uv.es/ friasnav/Davis_1980.pdf Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual-differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113-126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113 De Vignemont, F., & Singer, T. (2006). The empathic brain: How, when and why? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(10), 435-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tics.2006.08.008 De Weid, M., Goudena, P. P., & Matthys, W. (2005). Empathy in boys with disruptive behavior disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46(8), 867-880. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00389.x De Wied, M., Van Boxtel, A., Zaalberg, R., Goudena, P. P., & Matthys, W. (2006). Facial emg responses to Dynamic emotional facial expressions in boys with disruptive behavior disorders. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 40(2), 112-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jpsychires.2005.08.003 Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(2), 71-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582304267187 Decety, J., & Lamm, C. (2006). Human empathy through the lens of social neuroscience. The Scientific World Journal, 6, Article 280363, 1146-1163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/ tsw.2006.221 Domínguez-Lara, S. A. D., & Merino-Soto, C. M. (2015a). ¿Por qué es importante reportar los intervalos de confianza del coeficiente alfa de Cronbach? Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 13(2), 1326-1328. https://revistaumanizales.cinde.org. co/rlcsnj/index.php/Revista-Latinoamericana/article/download/2030/629 Domínguez-Lara, S. A. D., & Merino-Soto, C. M. (2015b). Sobre el reporte de confiabilidad del Clarp-tdah, de Salamanca (2010). Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 13(2), 1316-1319. Duan, C. (2000). Being empathic: The role of motivation to empathize and the nature of target emotions. Motivation and Emotion, 24(1), 29-49. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005587525609 Eisenberg, N. (2000). Empathy and Sympathy. En M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of Emotions (2a ed., pp. 677-691). Guilford. Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Prosocial development. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., Vol. 3., pp. 646-718). John Wiley. Eisenberg, N., & Lennon J. (1983). Sex differences in empathy and related capacities. Psychological Bulletin, 94(1), 100-131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.94.1.100 Escobedo Portillo, M. T., Hernández Gómez, J. A., Estebané Ortega, V., & Martínez Moreno, G. (2016). Modelos de ecuaciones estructurales: características, fases, construcción, aplicación y resultados. Ciencia & Trabajo, 18(55), 16-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/ S0718-24492016000100004 Ferrando, P. J., & Anguiano-Carrasco, C. (2010). El análisis factorial como técnica de investigación en psicología. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31(1), 18-33. https://www.pape lesdelpsicologo.es/pdf/1793.pdf Feshbach, N. D., & Feshbach, S. (1969). The relationship between empathy and aggression in two age groups. Developmental Psychology, 1, 102-107. https://doi.org/10.1037/H0027016 Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218- 226. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218 Fredrickson, B. L., Cohn, M. A., Coffey, K. A., Pek, J., & Finkel, S. M. (2008). Open hearts build lives: Positive emotions, induced through loving-kindness meditation, build consequential personal resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1045-1062. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013262 Gable, S. L., Reis, H. T., Impett, E. A., & Asher, E. R. (2004). What do you do when things go right? The intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits of sharing positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 228-245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.228 Gable, S. L., Gonzaga, G. C., & Strachman, A. (2006). Will you be there for me when things go right? Supportive responses to positive event disclosures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(5), 904-917. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.904 Gable, S. L., & Reis, H. T. (2010). Good News! Capitalizing on positive events in an interpersonal context. En M. P. Zanna & Olson, J. M. (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 195-257). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(10)42004-3 Ganegoda, D. B., & Bordia, P. (2019). I can be happy for you, but not all the time: A contingency model of envy and positive empathy in the workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(6), 776-795. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000377 Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson J. C. (1988). An update paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimentionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(2), 186-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378802500207 Goss-Sampson, M. (2019). Statistical analysis in jasp: A guide for students (2a ed.). University of Greenwich. https://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/25585/ Hambleton, R. (1993). Translating achievement tests for use in cross-national studies. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 9(1), 57-68. https://eric. ed.gov/?id=ED358128 Hambleton, R. (1994). Guidelines for adapting educational and psychological test: A progress report. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 10, 229-244. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED399291.pdf Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Adaptación de test para su uso en diferentes idiomas y culturas: fuentes de error, posibles soluciones y directrices prácticas. En J. Muníz (Ed.), Psicometría (pp. 209-238). Universitas. Hart, D., & Fegley, S. (1995). Prosocial behavior and caring in adolescence: Relations to self-understanding and social judgment. Child Development, 66(5), 1346-1359. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131651 Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, P. (2014). Metodología de la Investigación (6a ed.). McGraw-Hill; Interamericana Editores, S.A. Hicks, A. M., & Diamond, L. M. (2008). How was your day? Couples’ affect when telling and hearing daily events. Personal Relationships, 15(2), 205-228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2008.00194.x Jansen, E. (2021). Your success at work brings me joy or depression: Factors influencing the affective experiences of positive empathy and envy in meeting co-worker’s success [Tesis de maestría, University of Twente]. http://essay.utwente.nl/85567/1/Jansen%20MSc%20COM%20 Behavioural%20Management%20and%20Social%20 sciences.pdf Jiménez Martínez, J. (2017). Crianza, prosocialidad y relaciones entre los pares en la adolescencia. Factores implicados en los comportamientos antisociales [Tesis doctoral, Universitat de València]. https:// www.educacion.gob.es/teseo/imprimirFicheroTesis. do?idFichero=q%2BYBbnBLDP8%3D Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3a ed.). The Guilford Press. Lennon, R., Eisenberg, N., & Carroll, J. (1983). The assessment of empathy in early childhood. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 4(3), 295-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/0193-3973(83)90024-2 Light, S. N., Coan, J. A., Zahn-Waxler, C., Frye, C., Goldsmith, H. H., & Davidson, R. J. (2009). Empathy is associated with dynamic change in prefrontal brain electrical activity during positive emotion in children. Child Development, 80(4), 1210-1231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01326.x Light, S. N., Moran, Z. D., Zahn-Waxler, C., & Davidson, R. J. (2019). The measurement of positive valence forms of empathy and their relation to anhedonia and other depressive symptomatology. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 815. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00815 Llorca, A., Malonda, E., & Samper, P. (2017). Prosocial reasoning and emotions in young offenders and non-offenders. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 9(2), 65-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpal.2017.01.001 Liu, J., Qiao, X., Dong, F., & Raine, A. (2018). The Chinese version of the cognitive, affective, and somatic empathy scale for children: Validation, gender invariance and associated factors. PLoS one, 13(5), Article e0195268. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195268 McNeish, D. (2018). Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here. Psychological Methods, 23(3), 412-433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/met0000144 Mesurado, B. (2018, 6-9 de agosto). El rol de la empatía positiva y negativa en la conducta prosocial [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAWfbcGoqqg Mesurado, B., & Richaud, M. C. (2017). The relationship between parental variables, empathy and prosocial-flow with prosocial behavior toward strangers, friends, and family. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(3), 843-860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9748-7 Mesurado, B., Guerra, P., De Sanctis, F., & Rodriguez, L. M. (2019). Validation of the spanish version of the prosocial behavior toward different targets scale. International Social Work, 65(1), 175-186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872819858738 Mitchell, J. P. (2009). Inferences about mental states. Philosophical Transantions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 364(1521), 1309-1316. http://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0318 Montague, P. R., Berns, G. S., Cohen, J. D., McClure, S. M., Pagnoni, G., Dhamala, M., Wiest, M. C., Karpov, I., King, R. D., Apple, N., & Fisher, R. (2002). Hyperscanning: Simultaneous fmri during linked social interactions. NeuroImage, 16(4), 1159-1164. https://doi.org/10.1006/ nimg.2002.1150 Morelli, S. A., Lee, I. A., Arnn, M. E., & Zaki, J. (2015). Emotional and instrumental support provision interact to predict well-being. Emotion, 15(4), 484-493. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1037/emo0000084 Morelli, S. A., & Lieberman, M. D. (2013). The role of automaticity and attention in neural processes underlying empathy for happiness, sadness, and anxiety. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, Article 160. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00160 Morelli, S. A., Lieberman, M. D., Telzer, E. H., & Zaki, J. (En revisión). Positive empathy: Its structure and relation to prosociality, social connection, and well-being. Morelli, S. A., Lieberman, M. D., & Zaki, J. (2015). The emerging study of positive empathy. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(2), 57-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12157 Morelli, S. A., Rameson, L. T., & Lieberman, M. D. (2014). The neural components of empathy: Predicting daily prosocial behavior. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(1), 39-47. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss088 Morelli, S. A., Sacchet, M. D., & Zaki, J. (2015). Common and distinct neural correlates of personal and vicarious reward: A quantitative meta-analysis. NeuroImage, 112, 244-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.056 Nezlek, J. B., Feist, G. J., Wilson, F. C., & Plesko, R. M. (2001). Day-to-day variability in empathy as a function of daily events and mood. Journal of Research in Personality, 35(4), 401-423. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.2001.2332 Padilla-Walker, L. M., & Christensen, K. J. (2011). Empathy and self-regulation as mediators between parenting and adolescents’ prosocial behavior toward strangers, friends, and family. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(3), 545-551. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00695.x Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A classification and handbook. Oxford University Press; American Psychologicgal Association. Preston, S. D., & De Waal, F. B. M. (2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X02000018 Reis, H. T., Smith, S. M., Carmichael, C. L., Caprariello, P. A., Tsai, F.-F., Rodrigues, A., & Maniaci, M. R. (2010). Are you happy for me? How sharing positive events with others provides personal and interpersonal benefits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(2), 311-329. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018344 Roberts, W., & Strayer, J. (1996). Empathy, emotional expressiveness, and prosocial behavior. Child Development, 67(2), 449-470. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131826 Rodríguez, M. N., & Ruiz, M. A. (2008). Atenuación de la asimetría y de la curtosis de las puntuaciones observadas mediante transformaciones de variables: incidencia sobre la estructura factorial. Psicológica: Revista de Metodología y Psicología Experimental, 29(2), 205- 227. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo= 2718372 Roth-Hanania, R., Davidov, M., & Zahn-Waxler, C. (2011). Empathy development from 8 to 16 months: Early signs of concern for others. Infant Behavior & Development, 34(3), 447-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. infbeh.2011.04.007 Ruiz, M. A., Pardo, A., & San Martín, R. (2010). Modelos de ecuaciones estructurales. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31(1), 34-45. https://www.papelesdelpsicologo.es/pdf/1794.pdf Sallquist, J., Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., Eggum, N. D., & Gaertner, B. M. (2009). Assessment of preschoolers’ positive empathy: Concurrent and longitudinal relations with positive emotion, social competence, and sympathy. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(3), 223-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760902819444 Smith, K. D., Keating, J. P., & Stotland, E. (1989). Altruism reconsidered: The effect of denying feedback on a victim’s status to empathic witnesses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 641-650. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.641 Stern, J. A., & Cassidy, J. (2018). Empathy from infancy to adolescence: An attachment perspective on the development of individual differences. Developmental Review, 47, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2017.09 .002 Strayer, J. (1980). A naturalistic study of empathic behaviors and their relation to affective states and perspective taking skills in preschool children. Child Development, 51(3), 815-822. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129469 Strayer, J. (1993). Children’s concordant emotions and cognitions in response to observed emotions. Child Development, 64(1), 188-201. https://doi.org/10.2307/ 1131445 Telle, N. T., & Pfister, H. R. (2016). Positive Empathy and Prosocial Behavior: A neglected link. Emotion Review, 8(2), 154-163. https://doi. org/10.1177/1754073915586817 Vaish, A., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Sympathy through affective perspective taking and its relation to prosocial behavior in toddlers. Developmental Psychology, 45(2), 534-543. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014322 Wallace, B. A., & Shapiro, S. L. (2006). Mental balance and well-being: Building bridges between Buddhism and western psychology. American Psychologist, 61(7), 690- 701. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.690 Yue, T., Wei, J., Huang, X., & Jiang, Y. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Positive Empathy Scale among undergraduates. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 44(1), 131-138. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2016.44.1.131 Zahn-Waxler, C., Radke-Yarrow, M., Wagner, E., & Chapman, M. (1992). Development of concern for others. Developmental Psychology, 28(1), 126-136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.28.1.126 Zhou, Q., Eisenberg, N., Losoya, S. H., Fabes, R. A., Reiser, M., Guthrie, I. K., Murphy, B. C., Cumberland, A. J., & Shepard, S. A. (2002). The relations of parental warmth and positive expressiveness to children’s empathy related responding and social functioning: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 73(3), 893-915. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00446Acta Colombiana de Psicología - 2022info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/4210adaptationempathyprosocial behavioradolescenceadaptaciónempatíaconducta prosocialadolescenciaAdaptación y validación de la Escala Disposicional de Empatía Positiva a población adolescente argentinaAdaptation and Validation of the Dispositional Positive Empathy Scale to the Argentine Adolescent PopulationArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2643https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/8f6a75ba-9fc7-4f06-b3d7-57fae079bee3/download99b3ba1c02942eda737ff9d380c90b04MD5110983/28564oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/285642023-03-24 16:06:51.527http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0Acta Colombiana de Psicología - 2022https://repository.ucatolica.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaCbdigital@metabiblioteca.com