Funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems : una revisión conceptual y metodológica.

Today, identifying biased item tests is an inevitable task in the process of construction and validation of psychological tests. Thus, it is important to understand the concepts related to Differential Items Functioning (DIF) and the methods for its detection. This paper re­views the basic concepts...

Full description

Autores:
Herrera-Rojas, Aura Nidia
Sánchez-Pedraza, Ricardo
Gómez-Benito, Juana
Tipo de recurso:
Article of investigation
Fecha de publicación:
2001
Institución:
Universidad Católica de Colombia
Repositorio:
RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/28277
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/10983/28277
https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/589
Palabra clave:
Dif
Bias item
Bias test
Rights
openAccess
License
Aura Nidia Herrera Rojas, Ricardo Sánchez Pedraza, Juana Gómez Benito - 2001
id UCATOLICA2_1477163e05784589f9362c888ced8c84
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/28277
network_acronym_str UCATOLICA2
network_name_str RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems : una revisión conceptual y metodológica.
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv Funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems : una revisión conceptual y metodológica.
title Funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems : una revisión conceptual y metodológica.
spellingShingle Funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems : una revisión conceptual y metodológica.
Dif
Bias item
Bias test
title_short Funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems : una revisión conceptual y metodológica.
title_full Funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems : una revisión conceptual y metodológica.
title_fullStr Funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems : una revisión conceptual y metodológica.
title_full_unstemmed Funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems : una revisión conceptual y metodológica.
title_sort Funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems : una revisión conceptual y metodológica.
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Herrera-Rojas, Aura Nidia
Sánchez-Pedraza, Ricardo
Gómez-Benito, Juana
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Herrera-Rojas, Aura Nidia
Sánchez-Pedraza, Ricardo
Gómez-Benito, Juana
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv Dif
Bias item
Bias test
topic Dif
Bias item
Bias test
description Today, identifying biased item tests is an inevitable task in the process of construction and validation of psychological tests. Thus, it is important to understand the concepts related to Differential Items Functioning (DIF) and the methods for its detection. This paper re­views the basic concepts related to DIF within the context of tests construct validity. In addition, some important methods, commonly used for DIF detection, are described em­phasizing the advantages and limitations for its practical use.    
publishDate 2001
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2001-01-01 00:00:00
2023-01-23T15:40:30Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2001-01-01 00:00:00
2023-01-23T15:40:30Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2001-01-01
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv Journal article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 1909-9711
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0123-9155
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10983/28277
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/589
identifier_str_mv 1909-9711
0123-9155
url https://hdl.handle.net/10983/28277
https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/589
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/589/606
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv Núm. 5 , Año 2001
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv 61
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv 5
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv 41
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv Acta Colombiana de Psicología
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv Anastasi (1974)7esr Psicológicos (3ra ed.). Madrid: Aguilar.
Anastasi, A. y Urbina, S (1998). Test Psicológicos. (T ed.) México: Prentice Hall.
Angoff W.H. (1982). Use of difficulty and discrimination indices dor detecting ítem bias. En RA Berk (Ed), Handbook of Methods for Detecting Test Bias. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Angoff W. H. (1993). Perspectives on Differential Item Functioning Methodology. En P. W. Holland y H. Wainer (Eds), Differential Item Functioning. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Baker, F. B. (1981). Acriticism of Sheuneman’s Ítem bias technique. Journal of Educational Measurement, 18, 59-62.
Binet, A. y Simón, T. (1916). The development of intelligence in children. New York: Arno.
Bond, L. (1987). The Golden Rule settlement: A minority perspective. Educational Mea- sur ¿ment: Isuues and Practice. 6, 18-20.
Camilli, G. y Shepard, L. (1994). Methods for identiting biased test Ítems. London: SAGE Publications.
Christensen R. (1997). Log-Linear Models and Logistic regression. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
Colé, N. (1993). History and Development of DIF. En P. W. Holland y H. Wainer (Eds), Differential Item Functioning. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Dorans, N. J. y Holland, P. W. 1993. DIF De- tection and Description: Mantel-Haenszel and Standarization. En P. W. Holland y H. Wainer (Eds), Differential Item Functioning. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Eelles, K. Havighurst, R. J., Herrick, V. E. y Tyler, R. W. (1951). Intelligence and cul¬tural differences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Faggen, J (1987) Golden Rule revisited: Intro- duction. Educational Measurement: Isuues and Practice. 6, 5-8.
Ferreres, D. (1998). Funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems de una prueba de aptitud intelectual en función de la lengua familiar y la lengua de escolarización. Valencia: Universitat de Valencia. Tesis doctoral inédita.
Fidalgo, A.M. (1996). Funcionamiento diferecial de los Ítems. En J. Muñiz (Coord.) Psicometría. Madrid: Editorial Universitas, S.A.
Gómez, J., e Hidalgo, M. D. (1997). Evaluación del funcionamiento diferencial en ítems dicótomos: una revisión metodológica. Anuario de Psicología. 74, 3-32.
Hambleton, R. K., Clauser, B. E., Mazor, K. M. y Jones, R. W. (1993). Advances in the de- tection of Differentially functioning test Ítems. Journal ofPsychologicalAssessment, 9(1), 1-18.
Holland, P. W. y Thayer, D. T. (1988). Differential ítem performance and Mantel-Haenszel procedure. En H. Wainer y H.I. Braun (Eds) Test Validity. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Holland, P. W. y Wainer, H. (1993). Preface En P. W. Holland y H. Wainer (Eds), Dijferential Item Functioning. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Ironson GH. (1982). Use of chi-square and ltente trait approaches for detecting item bias. En RA Berk (Ed). Handbook ofMethods for Detecting Test Bias. Baltmore: John Hop- kins University Press.
Jensen, A. R. (1969). How much can we boast IQ and scholastic achievement?. Harvard Educational Review, 39, 1-123.
Kahn H.A., Sempos CT. (1989). Statistical methods in Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press. Kleinbaum D.G. (1994). Logistic regression. A selflearning text. New York: Springer.
Lim, R. G. y Drasgow, F. (1987). Implications of the Golden Rule settlement for test construction. Educational Measurement: Isuues and Practice, 6, 13-17.
Lim, R. G. y Drasgow, F. (1990). Evaluation of Two methods for estimating Item Response Theory parameters when assessing differential ítem functioning. Journal of Applied Psychology. 75(2), 164-174.
Linn R, L„ Harnisch D.L. (1981) Interactions between item content and group member- ship on achievement test Ítems. Journal of Educational Measurement; 18:109-118.
Linn, R. L. Levine, M. V. Hastings, G. N. y War- drop, J. L. (1981) An investigation of item bias in a test on reading comprehension. Applied Psychological Measurement. 5, 159-173.
Lord, F. M.( 1980). Aplications ofltem Response Theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale: LEA.
Mantel, N. y Haenszel, W. (1959). Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. Journal of The National Cáncer Institute, 22, 719-748.
Mellenbergh, G. (1982). Contingency table models for assesing item bias. Journal of Educational Statistics, 7, 105-118.
Millsap, R. E. y Everson, H. T. (1993). Meth- odology review: Statistical approaches for assessing measurement bias. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 297-334.
Muñiz, J. (1997) Introducción a la teoría de respuesta al ítem. Madrid: Ediciones Pirámide.
Muñiz, J. (1998) Teoría clásica de los test. Madrid: Ediciones Pirámide.
Powers, D. A. y Xie, Y. (2000). Statistical Methods for catagorical Data Analysis. San Diego: Academic Press.
Prieto Marañón, P; Barbero García, M. I. y San Luis Costas, C. (1997). Identification of nonuniform differential item functioning: A comparison of Mantel-Haenszel and Item Response Theory analysis procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57 (4) 559-568.
Raju, N. S. (1990). Determining the significance of estimated signed and unsigned areas between two item response function. Applied Psychological Measurement. 14, 197-207.
Reynolds, C. R. (1982). Methods for detecting construct and predictive bias. En R. A. Berk, (Ed). Handbook of methods for detecting test bias. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkuns University Press.
Rosner B. (1995) Fundamentáis of Biostatistics. (4a ed). Belmont: Duxbury Press.
Rudner, L.M., Getson, PR. y Knight, D.L. (1980). A Monte Cario comparison of seven biased item detection techniques. Journal o Educational Measurement, 17 (1), 1-10.
Scheuneman J.D. (1979). A new method for assesing bias in test Ítems. Journal of Educational Measurements: 16; 143-152.
Selvin S. (1996) Statistical analysis of epidemiological data. (2nd ed). New York: Oxford University Press.
Shealy, R. T. y Stout, W. F. (1993a). An item response theory model for test bias and differential test functioning. En P. W. Holland y H. Wainer (Eds). Differential item functioning. Hillsdale, N.J.: LEA.
Shealy, R. T. y Stout, W. F. (1993b). A model based standardization approach that sepa- rates true bias/DIF from gruop differences and detects test bias/DIF as well as item bias/ DIF. Psychometrika, 58; 159-194.
Shepard, L. A. (1982) Definitions of bias. En R. A. Berk (Ed). Handbook of methods for detecting test bias. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkuns University Press.
Shepard L. A, Camilli G, Williams DM. (1984) Accounting for statistical artifacts in item bias research. Journal of Educational Statistics: 9;93-l28.
Stern, W. (1914). The psychological methods of testing intelligence. Baltimore: Warwick y York.
Swaminathan, H. y Rogers, H. J. (1990). Detecting differential item functioning using logistic regression procedures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27; 361-370.
Thissen, D., Stienberg, L. y Gerrard, M. (1986). Beyond groups mean differences: The conceptofbias. Psychological Bulletin, 99,118- 128.
Van de Vijver, F. y Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural re¬search. London: SAGE Publications.
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv Aura Nidia Herrera Rojas, Ricardo Sánchez Pedraza, Juana Gómez Benito - 2001
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv Aura Nidia Herrera Rojas, Ricardo Sánchez Pedraza, Juana Gómez Benito - 2001
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Católica de Colombia
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/589
institution Universidad Católica de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/eb292ff9-eb6e-442a-812e-4aff7fea276d/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 8b109323e93d447e4f2a611334535e05
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_ 1812183389107650560
spelling Herrera-Rojas, Aura Nidia9ab6c7d5-25d0-4e57-a428-350a52ae0274Sánchez-Pedraza, Ricardo5aa0aca7-4caf-414d-b575-84c66f23ec25Gómez-Benito, Juana57dcf2d1-90e2-4df8-b403-67ecc58213ae2001-01-01 00:00:002023-01-23T15:40:30Z2001-01-01 00:00:002023-01-23T15:40:30Z2001-01-01Today, identifying biased item tests is an inevitable task in the process of construction and validation of psychological tests. Thus, it is important to understand the concepts related to Differential Items Functioning (DIF) and the methods for its detection. This paper re­views the basic concepts related to DIF within the context of tests construct validity. In addition, some important methods, commonly used for DIF detection, are described em­phasizing the advantages and limitations for its practical use.    application/pdf1909-97110123-9155https://hdl.handle.net/10983/28277https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/589spaUniversidad Católica de Colombiahttps://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/589/606Núm. 5 , Año 200161541Acta Colombiana de PsicologíaAnastasi (1974)7esr Psicológicos (3ra ed.). Madrid: Aguilar.Anastasi, A. y Urbina, S (1998). Test Psicológicos. (T ed.) México: Prentice Hall.Angoff W.H. (1982). Use of difficulty and discrimination indices dor detecting ítem bias. En RA Berk (Ed), Handbook of Methods for Detecting Test Bias. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Angoff W. H. (1993). Perspectives on Differential Item Functioning Methodology. En P. W. Holland y H. Wainer (Eds), Differential Item Functioning. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Baker, F. B. (1981). Acriticism of Sheuneman’s Ítem bias technique. Journal of Educational Measurement, 18, 59-62.Binet, A. y Simón, T. (1916). The development of intelligence in children. New York: Arno.Bond, L. (1987). The Golden Rule settlement: A minority perspective. Educational Mea- sur ¿ment: Isuues and Practice. 6, 18-20.Camilli, G. y Shepard, L. (1994). Methods for identiting biased test Ítems. London: SAGE Publications.Christensen R. (1997). Log-Linear Models and Logistic regression. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.Colé, N. (1993). History and Development of DIF. En P. W. Holland y H. Wainer (Eds), Differential Item Functioning. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Dorans, N. J. y Holland, P. W. 1993. DIF De- tection and Description: Mantel-Haenszel and Standarization. En P. W. Holland y H. Wainer (Eds), Differential Item Functioning. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Eelles, K. Havighurst, R. J., Herrick, V. E. y Tyler, R. W. (1951). Intelligence and cul¬tural differences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Faggen, J (1987) Golden Rule revisited: Intro- duction. Educational Measurement: Isuues and Practice. 6, 5-8.Ferreres, D. (1998). Funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems de una prueba de aptitud intelectual en función de la lengua familiar y la lengua de escolarización. Valencia: Universitat de Valencia. Tesis doctoral inédita.Fidalgo, A.M. (1996). Funcionamiento diferecial de los Ítems. En J. Muñiz (Coord.) Psicometría. Madrid: Editorial Universitas, S.A.Gómez, J., e Hidalgo, M. D. (1997). Evaluación del funcionamiento diferencial en ítems dicótomos: una revisión metodológica. Anuario de Psicología. 74, 3-32.Hambleton, R. K., Clauser, B. E., Mazor, K. M. y Jones, R. W. (1993). Advances in the de- tection of Differentially functioning test Ítems. Journal ofPsychologicalAssessment, 9(1), 1-18.Holland, P. W. y Thayer, D. T. (1988). Differential ítem performance and Mantel-Haenszel procedure. En H. Wainer y H.I. Braun (Eds) Test Validity. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Holland, P. W. y Wainer, H. (1993). Preface En P. W. Holland y H. Wainer (Eds), Dijferential Item Functioning. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Ironson GH. (1982). Use of chi-square and ltente trait approaches for detecting item bias. En RA Berk (Ed). Handbook ofMethods for Detecting Test Bias. Baltmore: John Hop- kins University Press.Jensen, A. R. (1969). How much can we boast IQ and scholastic achievement?. Harvard Educational Review, 39, 1-123.Kahn H.A., Sempos CT. (1989). Statistical methods in Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press. Kleinbaum D.G. (1994). Logistic regression. A selflearning text. New York: Springer.Lim, R. G. y Drasgow, F. (1987). Implications of the Golden Rule settlement for test construction. Educational Measurement: Isuues and Practice, 6, 13-17.Lim, R. G. y Drasgow, F. (1990). Evaluation of Two methods for estimating Item Response Theory parameters when assessing differential ítem functioning. Journal of Applied Psychology. 75(2), 164-174.Linn R, L„ Harnisch D.L. (1981) Interactions between item content and group member- ship on achievement test Ítems. Journal of Educational Measurement; 18:109-118.Linn, R. L. Levine, M. V. Hastings, G. N. y War- drop, J. L. (1981) An investigation of item bias in a test on reading comprehension. Applied Psychological Measurement. 5, 159-173.Lord, F. M.( 1980). Aplications ofltem Response Theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale: LEA.Mantel, N. y Haenszel, W. (1959). Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. Journal of The National Cáncer Institute, 22, 719-748.Mellenbergh, G. (1982). Contingency table models for assesing item bias. Journal of Educational Statistics, 7, 105-118.Millsap, R. E. y Everson, H. T. (1993). Meth- odology review: Statistical approaches for assessing measurement bias. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 297-334.Muñiz, J. (1997) Introducción a la teoría de respuesta al ítem. Madrid: Ediciones Pirámide.Muñiz, J. (1998) Teoría clásica de los test. Madrid: Ediciones Pirámide.Powers, D. A. y Xie, Y. (2000). Statistical Methods for catagorical Data Analysis. San Diego: Academic Press.Prieto Marañón, P; Barbero García, M. I. y San Luis Costas, C. (1997). Identification of nonuniform differential item functioning: A comparison of Mantel-Haenszel and Item Response Theory analysis procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57 (4) 559-568.Raju, N. S. (1990). Determining the significance of estimated signed and unsigned areas between two item response function. Applied Psychological Measurement. 14, 197-207.Reynolds, C. R. (1982). Methods for detecting construct and predictive bias. En R. A. Berk, (Ed). Handbook of methods for detecting test bias. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkuns University Press.Rosner B. (1995) Fundamentáis of Biostatistics. (4a ed). Belmont: Duxbury Press.Rudner, L.M., Getson, PR. y Knight, D.L. (1980). A Monte Cario comparison of seven biased item detection techniques. Journal o Educational Measurement, 17 (1), 1-10.Scheuneman J.D. (1979). A new method for assesing bias in test Ítems. Journal of Educational Measurements: 16; 143-152.Selvin S. (1996) Statistical analysis of epidemiological data. (2nd ed). New York: Oxford University Press.Shealy, R. T. y Stout, W. F. (1993a). An item response theory model for test bias and differential test functioning. En P. W. Holland y H. Wainer (Eds). Differential item functioning. Hillsdale, N.J.: LEA.Shealy, R. T. y Stout, W. F. (1993b). A model based standardization approach that sepa- rates true bias/DIF from gruop differences and detects test bias/DIF as well as item bias/ DIF. Psychometrika, 58; 159-194.Shepard, L. A. (1982) Definitions of bias. En R. A. Berk (Ed). Handbook of methods for detecting test bias. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkuns University Press.Shepard L. A, Camilli G, Williams DM. (1984) Accounting for statistical artifacts in item bias research. Journal of Educational Statistics: 9;93-l28.Stern, W. (1914). The psychological methods of testing intelligence. Baltimore: Warwick y York.Swaminathan, H. y Rogers, H. J. (1990). Detecting differential item functioning using logistic regression procedures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27; 361-370.Thissen, D., Stienberg, L. y Gerrard, M. (1986). Beyond groups mean differences: The conceptofbias. Psychological Bulletin, 99,118- 128.Van de Vijver, F. y Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural re¬search. London: SAGE Publications.Aura Nidia Herrera Rojas, Ricardo Sánchez Pedraza, Juana Gómez Benito - 2001info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/589DifBias itemBias testFuncionamiento diferencial de los ítems : una revisión conceptual y metodológica.Funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems : una revisión conceptual y metodológica.Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2682https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/eb292ff9-eb6e-442a-812e-4aff7fea276d/download8b109323e93d447e4f2a611334535e05MD5110983/28277oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/282772023-03-24 16:54:25.571https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Aura Nidia Herrera Rojas, Ricardo Sánchez Pedraza, Juana Gómez Benito - 2001https://repository.ucatolica.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaCbdigital@metabiblioteca.com

Publicaciones similares