La ley como concepto problemático en el texto shakesperiano : análisis de los discursos sobre derecho en Ricardo II y Enrique V.

Este artículo examina dos de las obras históricas de Shakespeare: Richard II y Henry V. Argumenta que Shakespeare intenta contrarrestar la opinión de que la ley es un conjunto de principios relativamente estables que pueden verse persistiendo indistintamente en tiempos turbulentos y pacíficos, y des...

Full description

Autores:
Belle, Anirudh
Tipo de recurso:
Article of investigation
Fecha de publicación:
2019
Institución:
Universidad Católica de Colombia
Repositorio:
RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/29666
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/10983/29666
https://doi.org/10.14718/NovumJus.2019.13.1.3
Palabra clave:
Shakespeare
Law
Law and literature
Justice
Shakespeare
Derecho
Derecho y literatura
Poder
Política
Rights
openAccess
License
Anirudh Belle - 2019
id UCATOLICA2_0bcf9bf2df4934df07434faff4d6a456
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/29666
network_acronym_str UCATOLICA2
network_name_str RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv La ley como concepto problemático en el texto shakesperiano : análisis de los discursos sobre derecho en Ricardo II y Enrique V.
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv Law as a problematic in the shakespeare text : analysing discourses on law in Richard II and Henry V.
title La ley como concepto problemático en el texto shakesperiano : análisis de los discursos sobre derecho en Ricardo II y Enrique V.
spellingShingle La ley como concepto problemático en el texto shakesperiano : análisis de los discursos sobre derecho en Ricardo II y Enrique V.
Shakespeare
Law
Law and literature
Justice
Shakespeare
Derecho
Derecho y literatura
Poder
Política
title_short La ley como concepto problemático en el texto shakesperiano : análisis de los discursos sobre derecho en Ricardo II y Enrique V.
title_full La ley como concepto problemático en el texto shakesperiano : análisis de los discursos sobre derecho en Ricardo II y Enrique V.
title_fullStr La ley como concepto problemático en el texto shakesperiano : análisis de los discursos sobre derecho en Ricardo II y Enrique V.
title_full_unstemmed La ley como concepto problemático en el texto shakesperiano : análisis de los discursos sobre derecho en Ricardo II y Enrique V.
title_sort La ley como concepto problemático en el texto shakesperiano : análisis de los discursos sobre derecho en Ricardo II y Enrique V.
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Belle, Anirudh
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Belle, Anirudh
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Shakespeare
Law
Law and literature
Justice
topic Shakespeare
Law
Law and literature
Justice
Shakespeare
Derecho
Derecho y literatura
Poder
Política
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv Shakespeare
Derecho
Derecho y literatura
Poder
Política
description Este artículo examina dos de las obras históricas de Shakespeare: Richard II y Henry V. Argumenta que Shakespeare intenta contrarrestar la opinión de que la ley es un conjunto de principios relativamente estables que pueden verse persistiendo indistintamente en tiempos turbulentos y pacíficos, y desarrolla este argumento en tres secciones temáticas. Analiza los conceptos de ley y justicia, así como la relación entre el poder y las divisiones políticas entre los principios legales o constitucionales arraigados, por un lado, y la política popular, por el otro, y demuestra cómo su interacción refleja la inestabilidad relativa de cualquier sistema político y jurídico.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01 00:00:00
2023-01-23T16:19:05Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01 00:00:00
2023-01-23T16:19:05Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.eng.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversion.eng.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.eng.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.driver.eng.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv Journal article
dc.type.redcol.eng.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.version.eng.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.14718/NovumJus.2019.13.1.3
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 2500-8692
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 1692-6013
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10983/29666
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.14718/NovumJus.2019.13.1.3
identifier_str_mv 10.14718/NovumJus.2019.13.1.3
2500-8692
1692-6013
url https://hdl.handle.net/10983/29666
https://doi.org/10.14718/NovumJus.2019.13.1.3
dc.language.iso.eng.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv https://novumjus.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/2107/2415
https://novumjus.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/2107/2475
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv Núm. 1 , Año 2019 : Enero - Junio
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv 68
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv 1
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv 47
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv 13
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv Novum Jus
dc.relation.references.eng.fl_str_mv Barthes, Roland. Image Music Text. London: Fontana Press, 1987.
Berger, Henry. Psychoanalysing the Shakespeare Text, in Emma Smith, ed. Shakespeare's Histories, 103-123. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2004.
Chernaik, Warren. The Cambridge Introduction to Shakespeare's History Plays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Dollimore, Jonathan, and Alan Sinfield. History and Ideology, in Alternative Shakespeares, ed. John Drakakis, 209-230. New York: Routledge, 2002.
Greenblatt, Stephen. Invisible Bullets: Renaissance Authority and Subversion in Henry VI and Henry V, in Jonathan Dollimore and Alan Sinfield, eds. Political Shakespeare: New Essays in Cultural Materialism Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1985.
Hart, H. L. A. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961.
Heinze, Eric. Heir, Celebrity, Martyr, Monster: Legal and Political Legitimacy in Shakespeare and Beyond. Law and Critique 20, No. 1 (2009).
Heinze, Eric. The Concept of Injustice. New York: Routledge, 2014. Holderness, Graham. Shakespeare: The Histories. New York: St. Martin's Press, 2000.
Hooker, Richard. Of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
Leggatt, Alexander. Shakespeare's Political Drama. The History Plays and the Roman Plays. New York: Routledge, 1988.
Lord Sumption, The Historian as Judge, The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. Available from: https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-161006.pdf (Accessed March 29, 2018).
Machiavelli, Nicollò. The Prince. T. Parks, trans. London: Penguin Classics, 2009.
Maus, Katharine Eisamen. Introductory Remarks to Richard the Second, in Stephen Greenblatt, ed. The Norton Shakespeare. 3rd ed. New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 2015.
Nietzsche, Friedrich. On the Genealogy of Morality, ed. K. Ansell-Pearson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
Pan, Wei. Towards a Consultative Rule of Law Regime in China, in Zhao S, ed. Debating political reform in China, 3-20. New York: Armonk, 2006.
Rackin, Phyllis. Stages of History: Shakespeare's English Chronicles. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.
Ward, Ian. Shakespeare and the Legal Imagination. London: Butterworths, 1999.
William Shakespeare, King Henry V. T. W. Craik, ed. The Arden Shakespeare: The Third Series, 1995.
William Shakespeare, King Richard II. Charles R. Forker, ed. The Arden Shakespeare: The Third Series, 2002.
dc.rights.eng.fl_str_mv Anirudh Belle - 2019
dc.rights.accessrights.eng.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.eng.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.creativecommons.eng.fl_str_mv Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
dc.rights.uri.eng.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
rights_invalid_str_mv Anirudh Belle - 2019
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.eng.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Catolica de Colombia
dc.source.eng.fl_str_mv https://novumjus.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/2107
institution Universidad Católica de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/15274bef-55a7-4e14-990e-547a552efc88/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 806387f5618faf96d77cfd6af77214df
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_ 1812183330887565312
spelling Belle, Anirudh38fae2a9-f674-4acf-92c2-1a54ae7681263002019-01-01 00:00:002023-01-23T16:19:05Z2019-01-01 00:00:002023-01-23T16:19:05Z2019-01-01Este artículo examina dos de las obras históricas de Shakespeare: Richard II y Henry V. Argumenta que Shakespeare intenta contrarrestar la opinión de que la ley es un conjunto de principios relativamente estables que pueden verse persistiendo indistintamente en tiempos turbulentos y pacíficos, y desarrolla este argumento en tres secciones temáticas. Analiza los conceptos de ley y justicia, así como la relación entre el poder y las divisiones políticas entre los principios legales o constitucionales arraigados, por un lado, y la política popular, por el otro, y demuestra cómo su interacción refleja la inestabilidad relativa de cualquier sistema político y jurídico.Traditional jurisprudence, with its roots in the seventeenth century, has been preoccupied with questions of legal legitimacy and the composition of law. In Shakespeare's history plays, one finds a parallel legal discourse. Shakespeare does not seem persuaded by ideas of a perfect legal order as much as he does by the problematics of law itself. This essay examines two of Shakespeare's history plays: Richard II[1]and Henry V.[2]These plays are positioned at both extremes of what scholars call the second tetralogy?. Their narratives are also couched in contrasting terms: the first is built on the image of a beleaguered monarchy, while the second, as it appears, on a more powerful and united polity. Taken together, the range offered by these texts lay ample ground to investigate the positions and promptings of a legal order.  This essay's main argument is that Shakespeare attempts to counter the view that the law is a relatively stable set of principles that can be seen persisting indifferently through turbulent and peaceful times. The argument is developed through three thematic sections. The first section, with two subsections, explores the meaning and implications of justice. Friedrich Nietzsche's aetiological descriptions of justice are applied to the action of both plays. It is argued that justice is an inherently fractured concept, lending it self to divisive tendencies far more than it does to order and unity. The law's supposed orientation towards justice, it follows, perils it with the same attributes. The second section, also divided into two subsections, looks at history, ceremony and power and demonstrates how these themes are used in the plays to complicate the image of law as a predictable, stable and unifying device. The third section examines entrenched legal or constitutional principles, on the one hand, and popular politics, on the other, and demonstrates how their interaction reflects the inherent instability of a legal order. The final section concludes. The observations in this essay are rooted in the plays texts. Therefore, while conclusions about broad themes like law or justice are stated in general terms, it would be helpful to view them in light of both plays and their specific narratives, before they are considered as broad inferences.  [1]William Shakespeare, King Richard II (C. R. Forker ed., Arden 3) (2002). [2]William Shakespeare, King Henry V (T. W. Craik ed., Arden 3) (1995).application/pdftext/html10.14718/NovumJus.2019.13.1.32500-86921692-6013https://hdl.handle.net/10983/29666https://doi.org/10.14718/NovumJus.2019.13.1.3engUniversidad Catolica de Colombiahttps://novumjus.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/2107/2415https://novumjus.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/2107/2475Núm. 1 , Año 2019 : Enero - Junio6814713Novum JusBarthes, Roland. Image Music Text. London: Fontana Press, 1987.Berger, Henry. Psychoanalysing the Shakespeare Text, in Emma Smith, ed. Shakespeare's Histories, 103-123. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2004.Chernaik, Warren. The Cambridge Introduction to Shakespeare's History Plays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Dollimore, Jonathan, and Alan Sinfield. History and Ideology, in Alternative Shakespeares, ed. John Drakakis, 209-230. New York: Routledge, 2002.Greenblatt, Stephen. Invisible Bullets: Renaissance Authority and Subversion in Henry VI and Henry V, in Jonathan Dollimore and Alan Sinfield, eds. Political Shakespeare: New Essays in Cultural Materialism Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1985.Hart, H. L. A. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961.Heinze, Eric. Heir, Celebrity, Martyr, Monster: Legal and Political Legitimacy in Shakespeare and Beyond. Law and Critique 20, No. 1 (2009).Heinze, Eric. The Concept of Injustice. New York: Routledge, 2014. Holderness, Graham. Shakespeare: The Histories. New York: St. Martin's Press, 2000.Hooker, Richard. Of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Leggatt, Alexander. Shakespeare's Political Drama. The History Plays and the Roman Plays. New York: Routledge, 1988.Lord Sumption, The Historian as Judge, The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. Available from: https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-161006.pdf (Accessed March 29, 2018).Machiavelli, Nicollò. The Prince. T. Parks, trans. London: Penguin Classics, 2009.Maus, Katharine Eisamen. Introductory Remarks to Richard the Second, in Stephen Greenblatt, ed. The Norton Shakespeare. 3rd ed. New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 2015.Nietzsche, Friedrich. On the Genealogy of Morality, ed. K. Ansell-Pearson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Pan, Wei. Towards a Consultative Rule of Law Regime in China, in Zhao S, ed. Debating political reform in China, 3-20. New York: Armonk, 2006.Rackin, Phyllis. Stages of History: Shakespeare's English Chronicles. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.Ward, Ian. Shakespeare and the Legal Imagination. London: Butterworths, 1999.William Shakespeare, King Henry V. T. W. Craik, ed. The Arden Shakespeare: The Third Series, 1995.William Shakespeare, King Richard II. Charles R. Forker, ed. The Arden Shakespeare: The Third Series, 2002.Anirudh Belle - 2019info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0https://novumjus.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/2107ShakespeareLawLaw and literatureJusticeShakespeareDerechoDerecho y literaturaPoderPolíticaLa ley como concepto problemático en el texto shakesperiano : análisis de los discursos sobre derecho en Ricardo II y Enrique V.Law as a problematic in the shakespeare text : analysing discourses on law in Richard II and Henry V.Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2593https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/15274bef-55a7-4e14-990e-547a552efc88/download806387f5618faf96d77cfd6af77214dfMD5110983/29666oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/296662023-03-24 15:49:39.647http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0Anirudh Belle - 2019https://repository.ucatolica.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaCbdigital@metabiblioteca.com