¿Innovación interna o externa? un dilema organizacional

Este artículo tiene como objetivo analziar el debate académico que existe respecto a los procesos de innovación interna y externa, y sus implicaciones de complementariedad o de sustituibilidad. En este sentido, las empresas deben analizar si deben mantener un enfoque de innovación cerrado por el efe...

Full description

Autores:: Luna Amador, Jorge Armando
Escobar Espinoza , Álvaro Andrés
Caraballo Payares, Alexander Mauricio

Tipo de recurso:: Article of journal

Fecha de publicación:: 2022

Institución:: Universidad de Cartagena

Repositorio:: Repositorio Universidad de Cartagena

Idioma:: spa

id	UCART2_b627cf099b880a3616cc12824cba1a61
oai_identifier_str	oai:repositorio.unicartagena.edu.co:11227/16265
network_acronym_str	UCART2
network_name_str	Repositorio Universidad de Cartagena
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	¿Innovación interna o externa? un dilema organizacional
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv	¿Internal or external innovation? An organizational dilemma
title	¿Innovación interna o externa? un dilema organizacional
spellingShingle	¿Innovación interna o externa? un dilema organizacional Innovation firms private sector development Innovación empresas desarrollo empresarial
title_short	¿Innovación interna o externa? un dilema organizacional
title_full	¿Innovación interna o externa? un dilema organizacional
title_fullStr	¿Innovación interna o externa? un dilema organizacional
title_full_unstemmed	¿Innovación interna o externa? un dilema organizacional
title_sort	¿Innovación interna o externa? un dilema organizacional
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Luna Amador, Jorge Armando Escobar Espinoza , Álvaro Andrés Caraballo Payares, Alexander Mauricio
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv	Luna Amador, Jorge Armando Escobar Espinoza , Álvaro Andrés Caraballo Payares, Alexander Mauricio
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv	Innovation firms private sector development
topic	Innovation firms private sector development Innovación empresas desarrollo empresarial
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	Innovación empresas desarrollo empresarial
description	Este artículo tiene como objetivo analziar el debate académico que existe respecto a los procesos de innovación interna y externa, y sus implicaciones de complementariedad o de sustituibilidad. En este sentido, las empresas deben analizar si deben mantener un enfoque de innovación cerrado por el efecto de sustituibilidad o un enfoque abierto por el efecto de complementariedad. Para esto, se analizan diferentes estudios empíricos que aportan a cada una estas posturas académicas, así como la fundamentación teórica que respalda dichas posturas. Como reflexión final, se encuentra que en un contexto de globalización las empresas no pueden aislarse del entorno y de su cada vez más rápido desarrollo tecnológico. Adicionalmente, la relación de complementariedad o sustituibilidad entre la innovación interna y externa va a depender del tipo de organización, así como de sus recursos y capacidades para integrar el conocimiento externo con sus procesos internos organizacionales.
publishDate	2022
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2022-01-15 00:00:00
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2022-01-15 00:00:00
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2022-01-15
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv	Journal article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	0122-8900
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://hdl.handle.net/11227/16265
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv	10.32997/pe-2022-4207
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv	2463-0470
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.32997/pe-2022-4207
identifier_str_mv	0122-8900 10.32997/pe-2022-4207 2463-0470
url	https://hdl.handle.net/11227/16265 https://doi.org/10.32997/pe-2022-4207
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv	Panorama Económico
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.unicartagena.edu.co/index.php/panoramaeconomico/article/download/4207/3352
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv	Núm. 1 , Año 2022
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv	40
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv	1
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv	25
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv	30
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv	Abdelaty, H. & Weiss, D. (2021). R&D capacity and the innovation collaboration paradox: the moderating role of the appropriation strategy. Innovation: Organization and Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2021.1971992 Adjapong, G., Amankwah, J., Yamoah, F., Acquaye, A., Syllias J. & Boi, N. (2022). Regional development, innovation systems and service companies' performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121258 Amara, N. & Landry, R. (2005). Sources of information as determinants of novelty of innovation in manufacturing firms: evidence from the 1999 statistics Canada innovation survey. Technovation 25, 245-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00113-5 Arias, J. & Vélez, J. (2022). Ignoring the three-way interaction of digital orientation, Not-invented-here syndrome and employee's artificial intelligence awareness in digital innovation performance: A recipe for failure. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121305 Ardito, L., & Petruzzelli, A. (2017). Breadth of external knowledge sourcing and product innovation: The moderating role of strategic human resource practices. European Management Journal, 35, 261-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2017.01.005 Arora, A., Athreye, S. & Huang, C. (2016). The paradox of openness revisited: Collaborative innovation and patenting by UK innovators. Research Policy, 45 (7), 1352-1361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.019 Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108 Bigliardi, B. (2013). The effect of innovation on financial performance: a research study involving SMEs. Innovation, 15 (2), 245-255. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.2013.15.2.245 Bigliardi, B., Ferraro, G., Fillipelli, S. & Galati, F. (2020). The influence of open innovation on firm performance. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1847979020969545 Bigliardi B, Ferraro G., Filippelli S. & Galati, F. (2021). The past, present and future of open innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24 (4). https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2019-0296 Carlaw, K., Oxley, L., Thorns, D., Nuth, M. & Walker, P. (2006). Beyond the hype: intellectual property and the knowledge society/knowledge economy. Journal of Economic Surveys 20(4), 643-690. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2006.00262.x Chabbouh, H. & Boujelbene, Y. (2022). Open innovation, dynamic organizational capacities and innovation performance in SMEs: Empirical evidence in the Tunisian manufacturing industry. The International Journal of Entreprenurship and Innovation. https://doi.org/10.1177/14657503211066014 Dahlander, L. & Gann, D. (2010). How open is innovation? Research Policy 39, 699-709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.013 Dahlander, L., O'Mahony, S., & Gann, D. (2016). One foot in, one foot out: How does individuals' external search breadth affect innovation outcomes. Strategic Management Journal, 37, 280-302. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2342 Darroch, J. (2005). Knowledge management, innovation and firm performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9 (3), 101-15. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270510602809 Delgado, M., Mart√≠n, G., González, J. & Navas J. (2021). Complements or substitutes? The contingent role of corporate reputation on the interplay between internal R&D and external knowledge sourcing. European Management Journal, 39, 70-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.07.001 Delgado, M., Martín, G. & Navas, J. (2011). Organizational Knowledge assets and innovation capability: Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12 (1), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691931111097890 Díaz, N., Aguiar, I. & De Saá, P. (2006), El Conocimiento Organizativo Tecnológico y la Capacidad de Innovación. Evidencia para la Empresa Industrial Española. Cuadernos de Economía y Direcci√≥n de la Empresa, 27, 33-60. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/807/80702702.pdf Felin, T., Zenger, T. (2014). Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice. Research Policy, 43(5), 914-925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.09.006 Freel, M. (2003). Sectoral patterns of small firm innovation, networking and proximity. Research Policy, 32, 751-770. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00084-7 Grimpe, C., & Kaiser, U. (2010). Balancing internal and external knowledge acquisition: The gains and pains from R&D outsourcing. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 1483-1509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00946.x Hameed, W., Nisar, Q. & Wu, H. (2021). Relationships between external knowledge, internal innovation, firms' open innovation performance, service innovation and business performance in the Pakistani hotel industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 92, 102745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102745 Hill, C. & Rothaermel, F. (2003). The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 257-74. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2003.9416161 Jaramillo, H., Lugones, G., & Salazar, M. (2001). Manual de Bogotá. Bogotá: Red Iberoamericana de Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología, Organización de Estados Americanos. https://minciencias.gov.co/sites/default/files/bogota.pdf Kahosi, D., Wu, J., Epede, B. & Gutama, G. (2021). Empirical research on the role of internal social capital upon the innovation performance of cooperative firms. Human System Management, 40 (3), https://doi.org/407-420. 10.3233/HSM-190830 Lichtenthaler U. (2016). Determinants of absorptive capacity: the value of technology and market orientation for external knowledge acquisition. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 31(5), 600-610. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-04-2015-0076 Laursen, K. (2012). Keep searching and you'll find: what do we know about variety creation through firms' search activities for innovation? Ind. Corp. Change 21(5), 1181-1220 (2012) Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111e125. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250131009 Lorenzon, E. (2020). Sistemas y Organizaciones. Editorial de la UNLP. http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/bitstream/handle/10915/99629/Documento_completo.pdf-PDFA.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y Muñoz, F., Sanchez, M. & De Massis, A. (2020). Combining Internal and External R&D: The Effects on Innovation Performance in Family and Nonfamily Firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 44 (5), 996-1031. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719879674 Najar, T. (2022). Lean-Agile supply chain innovation performance; the mediating role of dynamic capability, innovation capacity, and relational embeddedness. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 23, 285-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2022.2031276 Natalicchio, A., Ardito, L., Savino, T., & Albino, V. (2017). Managing knowledge assets for open innovation: A systematic literature review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21 (6), 1362-1383. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2016-0516 Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, Oxford University Press, New York, NY. https://books.google.com.co/books/about/The_Knowledge_creating_Company.html?id=B-qxrPaU1-MC&redir_esc=y Nylund P., Ferras X. & Brem A. (2020). Automating profitably together: Is there an impact of open innovation and automation on firm turnover? Review of Managerial Science, 14(1), 269-285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-018-0294-z Oerlemans, L., Meeus, M. & Boekema, F. (1998). Do networks matter for innovation? The usefulness of the economic network approach in analysing innovation. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 89, 298-309. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00029 Peteraf, M. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (3), 179-191. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2486921 Popa, S., Soto, P., & Martínez I. (2017). Antecedents, moderators, and outcomes of innovation climate and open innovation: an empirical study in SMEs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 118, 134-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.014 Reed, K., Lubatkin, M. & Srinivasan, N. (2006). Proposing and testing an intellectual capital-based view of the firm. Journal of Management Studies, 43 (4), 867-893. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00614.x Rehman, S., Tiwari A., & Turner C. (2018). A framework for innovation outsourcing. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 16(1), 79-111. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2018.091085 Rojas, B. (2007). La creatividad e innovación en las organizaciones. Sapiens, 8 (1), 111-130. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/410/41080108.pdf Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. (2001). Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 287-306. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.160 Ruíz, E. & Beretta, M. (2021). Managing internal and external crowdsourcing: An investigation of emerging challenges in the context of a less experienced firm. Technovation, 106, 102290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102290 Ruíz, E. & Beretta, M. (2018). Combining Open and Closed Forms of Innovation: An Investigation of Emerging Tensions and Management Approaches en Müller, S., Nielsen, J. (eds) Nordic Contributions in IS Research. SCIS 2018. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 326. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96367-9_3 Savino, T., Petruzzelli, A. M., & Albino, V. (2017). Search and recombination process to innovate: A review of the empirical evidence and a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19 (1), 54-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12081 Schmelzle, U. & Tate, W. (2017). Integrating External Knowledge: Building a Conceptual Framework of Innovation Sourcing. Transportation Journal, 56 (4), 477-512. https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.56.4.0477 Snell, S. & Dean, J. (1992). Integrated manufacturing and human resource management: a human capital perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 35 (3), 467-504. https://doi.org/10.2307/256484 Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (7), 509-33. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3088148 Vega, J., Gutierrez, A., & Fernandez, I. (2009). Does external knowledge sourcing matter for innovation? Evidence from the Spanish manufacturing industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18, 637-670. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtp023 Vivas, C. & Barge, A. (2015). Impact on firms of the use of knowledge external sources: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Economics Surveys, 29 (5), 943-964. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12089 Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5 (2,) 171-80. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2486175 Wu, S., Xiuhao, D., Ruihong, L. & Hui G. (2021). How does IT capability affect open innovation performance? The mediating effect of absorptive capacity. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24 (1), 43-65. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2019-0043 Wu, W., Chang, M., & Chen, C. (2008). Promoting innovation through the accumulation of intellectual capital, social capital, and entrepreneurial orientation. R & D Management, 38, 265-277. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9914.00120-i1 Wu, W., Tsai, H., Cheng, K. & Lai, M. (2006). Assessment of intellectual capital management in Taiwanese IC design companies: using DEA and the Malmquist Productivity Index. R&D Management, 36 (5), 531-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00452.x Yaseen, S. (2019). Potential Absorptive Capacity, Realized Absorptive Capacity and Innovation Performance. In: Ahram, T., Taiar, R., Colson, S., Choplin, A. (eds) Human Interaction and Emerging Technologies. IHIET 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1018. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25629-6_135 Zack, M. (1999). Developing a knowledge strategy. California Management Review, 41 (3), 125-45. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166000 Zapata, G. (2020). Capacidades dinámicas e innovación en las organizaciones. Una revisión de la literatura y proposiciones básicas. Compendium, 23 (45). https://www.redalyc.org/journal/880/88066290003/html/#:~:text=Finalmente%2C%20como%20resultado%20se%20consideran,adaptaci%C3%B3n%20y%20capacidad%20de%20aprendizaje Zuchowski, O., Possega, O., Schlagwein, D. & Fischbach, K. (2016). Internal Crowdsourcing: Conceptual Framework, Structured Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Information Technology, 31 (2), 166-184. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2016.14
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad de Cartagena
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.unicartagena.edu.co/index.php/panoramaeconomico/article/view/4207
institution	Universidad de Cartagena
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://repositorio.unicartagena.edu.co/bitstreams/9033d501-892d-4087-abb0-55368599a457/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	51a2e31c2fe15c3382f96b1d4dfeb136
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Biblioteca Digital Universidad de Cartagena
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_	1814214007107616768
spelling	Luna Amador, Jorge ArmandoEscobar Espinoza , Álvaro AndrésCaraballo Payares, Alexander Mauricio2022-01-15 00:00:002022-01-15 00:00:002022-01-150122-8900https://hdl.handle.net/11227/1626510.32997/pe-2022-42072463-0470https://doi.org/10.32997/pe-2022-4207Este artículo tiene como objetivo analziar el debate académico que existe respecto a los procesos de innovación interna y externa, y sus implicaciones de complementariedad o de sustituibilidad. En este sentido, las empresas deben analizar si deben mantener un enfoque de innovación cerrado por el efecto de sustituibilidad o un enfoque abierto por el efecto de complementariedad. Para esto, se analizan diferentes estudios empíricos que aportan a cada una estas posturas académicas, así como la fundamentación teórica que respalda dichas posturas. Como reflexión final, se encuentra que en un contexto de globalización las empresas no pueden aislarse del entorno y de su cada vez más rápido desarrollo tecnológico. Adicionalmente, la relación de complementariedad o sustituibilidad entre la innovación interna y externa va a depender del tipo de organización, así como de sus recursos y capacidades para integrar el conocimiento externo con sus procesos internos organizacionales.This paper aims to make a theoretical reflection on the academic debate that exists regarding whether internal and external innovation have a complementary or substitutable relationship, therefore, companies must analyze whether they should maintain a closed innovation approach due to the effect of substitutability or an open approach due to the effect of complementarity. For this, different empirical studies that contribute to these academic positions are analyzed, as well as the theoretical foundation that supports said positions. As a final reflection, it is found that in a context of globalization, companies cannot isolate themselves from the environment and from its increasingly rapid technological development. Additionally, the relationship of complementarity or substitutability between internal and external innovation will depend on the type of organization, as well as its resources and capacities to integrate external knowledge with its internal organizational processes.application/pdfspaUniversidad de CartagenaPanorama Económicohttps://revistas.unicartagena.edu.co/index.php/panoramaeconomico/article/download/4207/3352Núm. 1 , Año 20224012530Abdelaty, H. & Weiss, D. (2021). R&D capacity and the innovation collaboration paradox: the moderating role of the appropriation strategy. Innovation: Organization and Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2021.1971992Adjapong, G., Amankwah, J., Yamoah, F., Acquaye, A., Syllias J. & Boi, N. (2022). Regional development, innovation systems and service companies' performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121258Amara, N. & Landry, R. (2005). Sources of information as determinants of novelty of innovation in manufacturing firms: evidence from the 1999 statistics Canada innovation survey. Technovation 25, 245-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00113-5Arias, J. & Vélez, J. (2022). Ignoring the three-way interaction of digital orientation, Not-invented-here syndrome and employee's artificial intelligence awareness in digital innovation performance: A recipe for failure. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121305Ardito, L., & Petruzzelli, A. (2017). Breadth of external knowledge sourcing and product innovation: The moderating role of strategic human resource practices. European Management Journal, 35, 261-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2017.01.005Arora, A., Athreye, S. & Huang, C. (2016). The paradox of openness revisited: Collaborative innovation and patenting by UK innovators. Research Policy, 45 (7), 1352-1361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.019Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108Bigliardi, B. (2013). The effect of innovation on financial performance: a research study involving SMEs. Innovation, 15 (2), 245-255. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.2013.15.2.245Bigliardi, B., Ferraro, G., Fillipelli, S. & Galati, F. (2020). The influence of open innovation on firm performance. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1847979020969545Bigliardi B, Ferraro G., Filippelli S. & Galati, F. (2021). The past, present and future of open innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24 (4). https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2019-0296Carlaw, K., Oxley, L., Thorns, D., Nuth, M. & Walker, P. (2006). Beyond the hype: intellectual property and the knowledge society/knowledge economy. Journal of Economic Surveys 20(4), 643-690. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2006.00262.xChabbouh, H. & Boujelbene, Y. (2022). Open innovation, dynamic organizational capacities and innovation performance in SMEs: Empirical evidence in the Tunisian manufacturing industry. The International Journal of Entreprenurship and Innovation. https://doi.org/10.1177/14657503211066014Dahlander, L. & Gann, D. (2010). How open is innovation? Research Policy 39, 699-709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.013Dahlander, L., O'Mahony, S., & Gann, D. (2016). One foot in, one foot out: How does individuals' external search breadth affect innovation outcomes. Strategic Management Journal, 37, 280-302. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2342Darroch, J. (2005). Knowledge management, innovation and firm performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9 (3), 101-15. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270510602809Delgado, M., Mart√≠n, G., González, J. & Navas J. (2021). Complements or substitutes? The contingent role of corporate reputation on the interplay between internal R&D and external knowledge sourcing. European Management Journal, 39, 70-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.07.001Delgado, M., Martín, G. & Navas, J. (2011). Organizational Knowledge assets and innovation capability: Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12 (1), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691931111097890Díaz, N., Aguiar, I. & De Saá, P. (2006), El Conocimiento Organizativo Tecnológico y la Capacidad de Innovación. Evidencia para la Empresa Industrial Española. Cuadernos de Economía y Direcci√≥n de la Empresa, 27, 33-60. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/807/80702702.pdfFelin, T., Zenger, T. (2014). Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice. Research Policy, 43(5), 914-925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.09.006Freel, M. (2003). Sectoral patterns of small firm innovation, networking and proximity. Research Policy, 32, 751-770. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00084-7Grimpe, C., & Kaiser, U. (2010). Balancing internal and external knowledge acquisition: The gains and pains from R&D outsourcing. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 1483-1509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00946.xHameed, W., Nisar, Q. & Wu, H. (2021). Relationships between external knowledge, internal innovation, firms' open innovation performance, service innovation and business performance in the Pakistani hotel industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 92, 102745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102745Hill, C. & Rothaermel, F. (2003). The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 257-74. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2003.9416161Jaramillo, H., Lugones, G., & Salazar, M. (2001). Manual de Bogotá. Bogotá: Red Iberoamericana de Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología, Organización de Estados Americanos. https://minciencias.gov.co/sites/default/files/bogota.pdfKahosi, D., Wu, J., Epede, B. & Gutama, G. (2021). Empirical research on the role of internal social capital upon the innovation performance of cooperative firms. Human System Management, 40 (3), https://doi.org/407-420. 10.3233/HSM-190830Lichtenthaler U. (2016). Determinants of absorptive capacity: the value of technology and market orientation for external knowledge acquisition. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 31(5), 600-610. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-04-2015-0076Laursen, K. (2012). Keep searching and you'll find: what do we know about variety creation through firms' search activities for innovation? Ind. Corp. Change 21(5), 1181-1220 (2012)Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111e125. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250131009Lorenzon, E. (2020). Sistemas y Organizaciones. Editorial de la UNLP. http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/bitstream/handle/10915/99629/Documento_completo.pdf-PDFA.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=yMuñoz, F., Sanchez, M. & De Massis, A. (2020). Combining Internal and External R&D: The Effects on Innovation Performance in Family and Nonfamily Firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 44 (5), 996-1031. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719879674Najar, T. (2022). Lean-Agile supply chain innovation performance; the mediating role of dynamic capability, innovation capacity, and relational embeddedness. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 23, 285-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2022.2031276Natalicchio, A., Ardito, L., Savino, T., & Albino, V. (2017). Managing knowledge assets for open innovation: A systematic literature review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21 (6), 1362-1383. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2016-0516Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, Oxford University Press, New York, NY. https://books.google.com.co/books/about/The_Knowledge_creating_Company.html?id=B-qxrPaU1-MC&redir_esc=yNylund P., Ferras X. & Brem A. (2020). Automating profitably together: Is there an impact of open innovation and automation on firm turnover? Review of Managerial Science, 14(1), 269-285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-018-0294-zOerlemans, L., Meeus, M. & Boekema, F. (1998). Do networks matter for innovation? The usefulness of the economic network approach in analysing innovation. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 89, 298-309. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00029Peteraf, M. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (3), 179-191. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2486921Popa, S., Soto, P., & Martínez I. (2017). Antecedents, moderators, and outcomes of innovation climate and open innovation: an empirical study in SMEs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 118, 134-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.014Reed, K., Lubatkin, M. & Srinivasan, N. (2006). Proposing and testing an intellectual capital-based view of the firm. Journal of Management Studies, 43 (4), 867-893. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00614.xRehman, S., Tiwari A., & Turner C. (2018). A framework for innovation outsourcing. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 16(1), 79-111. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2018.091085Rojas, B. (2007). La creatividad e innovación en las organizaciones. Sapiens, 8 (1), 111-130. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/410/41080108.pdfRosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. (2001). Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 287-306. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.160Ruíz, E. & Beretta, M. (2021). Managing internal and external crowdsourcing: An investigation of emerging challenges in the context of a less experienced firm. Technovation, 106, 102290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102290Ruíz, E. & Beretta, M. (2018). Combining Open and Closed Forms of Innovation: An Investigation of Emerging Tensions and Management Approaches en Müller, S., Nielsen, J. (eds) Nordic Contributions in IS Research. SCIS 2018. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 326. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96367-9_3Savino, T., Petruzzelli, A. M., & Albino, V. (2017). Search and recombination process to innovate: A review of the empirical evidence and a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19 (1), 54-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12081Schmelzle, U. & Tate, W. (2017). Integrating External Knowledge: Building a Conceptual Framework of Innovation Sourcing. Transportation Journal, 56 (4), 477-512. https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.56.4.0477Snell, S. & Dean, J. (1992). Integrated manufacturing and human resource management: a human capital perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 35 (3), 467-504. https://doi.org/10.2307/256484Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (7), 509-33. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3088148Vega, J., Gutierrez, A., & Fernandez, I. (2009). Does external knowledge sourcing matter for innovation? Evidence from the Spanish manufacturing industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18, 637-670. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtp023Vivas, C. & Barge, A. (2015). Impact on firms of the use of knowledge external sources: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Economics Surveys, 29 (5), 943-964. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12089Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5 (2,) 171-80. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2486175Wu, S., Xiuhao, D., Ruihong, L. & Hui G. (2021). How does IT capability affect open innovation performance? The mediating effect of absorptive capacity. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24 (1), 43-65. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2019-0043Wu, W., Chang, M., & Chen, C. (2008). Promoting innovation through the accumulation of intellectual capital, social capital, and entrepreneurial orientation. R & D Management, 38, 265-277. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9914.00120-i1Wu, W., Tsai, H., Cheng, K. & Lai, M. (2006). Assessment of intellectual capital management in Taiwanese IC design companies: using DEA and the Malmquist Productivity Index. R&D Management, 36 (5), 531-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00452.xYaseen, S. (2019). Potential Absorptive Capacity, Realized Absorptive Capacity and Innovation Performance. In: Ahram, T., Taiar, R., Colson, S., Choplin, A. (eds) Human Interaction and Emerging Technologies. IHIET 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1018. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25629-6_135Zack, M. (1999). Developing a knowledge strategy. California Management Review, 41 (3), 125-45. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166000Zapata, G. (2020). Capacidades dinámicas e innovación en las organizaciones. Una revisión de la literatura y proposiciones básicas. Compendium, 23 (45). https://www.redalyc.org/journal/880/88066290003/html/#:~:text=Finalmente%2C%20como%20resultado%20se%20consideran,adaptaci%C3%B3n%20y%20capacidad%20de%20aprendizajeZuchowski, O., Possega, O., Schlagwein, D. & Fischbach, K. (2016). Internal Crowdsourcing: Conceptual Framework, Structured Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Information Technology, 31 (2), 166-184. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2016.14https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEsta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.https://revistas.unicartagena.edu.co/index.php/panoramaeconomico/article/view/4207Innovationfirmsprivate sector developmentInnovaciónempresasdesarrollo empresarial¿Innovación interna o externa? un dilema organizacional¿Internal or external innovation? An organizational dilemmaArtículo de revistainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2645https://repositorio.unicartagena.edu.co/bitstreams/9033d501-892d-4087-abb0-55368599a457/download51a2e31c2fe15c3382f96b1d4dfeb136MD5111227/16265oai:repositorio.unicartagena.edu.co:11227/162652024-09-05 15:19:29.312https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0metadata.onlyhttps://repositorio.unicartagena.edu.coBiblioteca Digital Universidad de Cartagenabdigital@metabiblioteca.com

¿Innovación interna o externa? un dilema organizacional

Publicaciones similares