Calidad en revisiones sistemáticas de evaluaciones económicas de tecnologías en salud.

Autores:: Castañeda Guerrero, Carolina
De la Hoz Restrepo, Fernando
Alvis Guzmán, Nelson

Tipo de recurso:: Article of journal

Fecha de publicación:: 2019

Institución:: Universidad de Cartagena

Repositorio:: Repositorio Universidad de Cartagena

Idioma:: spa

id	UCART2_b22e52bd0a3948f0943656f6afbd53c0
oai_identifier_str	oai:repositorio.unicartagena.edu.co:11227/13846
network_acronym_str	UCART2
network_name_str	Repositorio Universidad de Cartagena
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	Calidad en revisiones sistemáticas de evaluaciones económicas de tecnologías en salud.
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv	Quality in systematic reviews of economic evaluations of health technologies.
title	Calidad en revisiones sistemáticas de evaluaciones económicas de tecnologías en salud.
spellingShingle	Calidad en revisiones sistemáticas de evaluaciones económicas de tecnologías en salud. Health technologies Systematic review Economic evaluation Quality Quality assessment Tecnologías sanitarias Tecnologías en salud Revisiones sistemáticas Evaluaciones económicas Calidad Evaluación calidad Technologies de la santé Revue systématique Évaluation économique Qualité Évaluation qualité
title_short	Calidad en revisiones sistemáticas de evaluaciones económicas de tecnologías en salud.
title_full	Calidad en revisiones sistemáticas de evaluaciones económicas de tecnologías en salud.
title_fullStr	Calidad en revisiones sistemáticas de evaluaciones económicas de tecnologías en salud.
title_full_unstemmed	Calidad en revisiones sistemáticas de evaluaciones económicas de tecnologías en salud.
title_sort	Calidad en revisiones sistemáticas de evaluaciones económicas de tecnologías en salud.
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Castañeda Guerrero, Carolina De la Hoz Restrepo, Fernando Alvis Guzmán, Nelson
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv	Castañeda Guerrero, Carolina De la Hoz Restrepo, Fernando Alvis Guzmán, Nelson
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv	Health technologies Systematic review Economic evaluation Quality Quality assessment
topic	Health technologies Systematic review Economic evaluation Quality Quality assessment Tecnologías sanitarias Tecnologías en salud Revisiones sistemáticas Evaluaciones económicas Calidad Evaluación calidad Technologies de la santé Revue systématique Évaluation économique Qualité Évaluation qualité
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	Tecnologías sanitarias Tecnologías en salud Revisiones sistemáticas Evaluaciones económicas Calidad Evaluación calidad Technologies de la santé Revue systématique Évaluation économique Qualité Évaluation qualité
publishDate	2019
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2019-07-01 00:00:00
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2019-07-01 00:00:00
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2019-07-01
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv	Journal article
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	0122-8900
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://hdl.handle.net/11227/13846
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv	10.32997/2463-0470-vol.27-num.3-2019-2583
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv	2463-0470
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.32997/2463-0470-vol.27-num.3-2019-2583
identifier_str_mv	0122-8900 10.32997/2463-0470-vol.27-num.3-2019-2583 2463-0470
url	https://hdl.handle.net/11227/13846 https://doi.org/10.32997/2463-0470-vol.27-num.3-2019-2583
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv	Panorama Económico
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.unicartagena.edu.co/index.php/panoramaeconomico/article/download/2583/2161
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv	Núm. 3 , Año 2019
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv	597
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv	3
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv	581
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv	27
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv	Adarkwah, C. C., van Gils, P. F., Hiligsmann, M., & Evers, S. M. (2016). Risk of bias in model-based economic evaluations: the ECOBIAS checklist. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, 16(4), 513-523. https://doi.org/10.1586/14737167.2015.1103185 : PMid:26588001 Akers J, Aguiar-Ibáñez R, Baba-Akbari A, Beynon S, Booth A, Burch J, . . . Fonseca T. (2009). Systematic Reviews of Economic EvaluationsSystematic Reviews. CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care.: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York. Retrieved from http://www.york.ac.uk/crd/SysRev/!SSL!/WebHelp/SysRev3.htm Anderson, R. (2010). Systematic reviews of economic evaluations: utility or futility? Health Econ, 19(3), 350-364. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1486 : PMid:19378354 Atehortua, S., Ceballos, M., Gaviria, C. F., & Mejia, A. (2013). [Quality assessment of economic evaluations in health care in Colombia: a systematic review]. Biomedica, 33(4), 615-630. https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.v33i4.1536 : PMid:24652216 Atkins, D., Best, D., Briss, P. A., Eccles, M., Falck-Ytter, Y., Flottorp, S., . . . Zaza, S. (2004). Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 328(7454), 1490. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490 : PMid:15205295 PMCid:PMC428525 Augustovski, F., García Martí, S., & Pichon-Riviere, A. (2013). Estándares Consolidados de Reporte de Evaluaciones Económicas Sanitarias: Versión en Español de la Lista de Comprobación CHEERS. Value in Health Regional Issues, 2(3), 338-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vhri.2013.10.004 : PMid:29702767 Borgerson, K. (2009). Valuing evidence: bias and the evidence hierarchy of evidence-based medicine. Perspect Biol Med, 52(2), 218-233. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.0.0086 : PMid:19395821 Briggs A, C. K., Sculper M,. (2007). Decision modelling for health economic evaluation. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press. Brouwer, W. B., Culyer, A. J., van Exel, N. J., & Rutten, F. F. (2008). Welfarism vs. extra-welfarism. J Health Econ, 27(2), 325-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.07.003 : PMid:18179835 Brunetti, M., Shemilt, I., Pregno, S., Vale, L., Oxman, A. D., Lord, J., . . . Schunemann, H. J. (2013). GRADE guidelines: 10. Considering resource use and rating the quality of economic evidence. J Clin Epidemiol, 66(2), 140-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.04.012 : PMid:22863410 Cochrane Website. Cochrane Collaboration. Retrieved Marzo 7, 2019, from https://www.cochrane.org/about-us Cooper, N., Coyle, D., Abrams, K., Mugford, M., & Sutton, A. (2005). Use of evidence in decision models: an appraisal of health technology assessments in the UK since 1997. J Health Serv Res Policy, 10(4), 245-250. https://doi.org/10.1258/135581905774414187 : PMid:16259692 Chaikledkaew, U., & Kittrongsiri, K. (2014). Quality assessment of health economic evaluation. J Med Assoc Thai, 97 Suppl 5, S113-118. Drummond, M., Barbieri, M., Cook, J., Glick, H. A., Lis, J., Malik, F., . . . Severens, J. (2009). Transferability of economic evaluations across jurisdictions: ISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force report. Value Health, 12(4), 409-418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00489.x : PMid:19900249 Drummond, M. F., & Jefferson, T. O. (1996). Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. The BMJ Economic Evaluation Working Party. BMJ, 313(7052), 275-283. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7052.275 : PMid:8704542 PMCid:PMC2351717. Drummond MF, S. M., Claxton K, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW (2015). Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Oxford - United Kingdom. EunetHTA. (2015). Methods for health economic evaluations - A guideline based on current practices in Europe. Retrieved marzo 23, 2019, from https://www.eunethta.eu/wpcontent/uploads/2018/03/Methods_for_health_economic_evaluations.pdf Evers, S., Goossens, M., de Vet, H., van Tulder, M., & Ament, A. (2005). Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: Consensus on Health Economic Criteria. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 21(2), 240-245. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462305050324 : PMid:15921065 García Fariñas, A., García Rodríguez, J. F., Gálvez González, A. M., & Jimenez López, G. (2016). Calidad metodológica de las evaluaciones económicas completas, publicadas en revistas médicas cubanas (1999-2014). Revista Cubana de Salud Pública, 42, 183-192. Gomersall, J. S., Jadotte, Y. T., Xue, Y., Lockwood, S., Riddle, D., & Preda, A. (2014). The Systematic Review of Economic Evaluation Evidence.: The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers' Manual 2014. Gomersall, J. S., Jadotte, Y. T., Xue, Y., Lockwood, S., Riddle, D., & Preda, A. (2015). Conducting systematic reviews of economic evaluations. Int J Evid Based Healthc, 13(3), 170-178. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000063 : PMid:26288063 Gray, A. M. C., P.M.; Wolstenholme, J.L.; Wordsworth S. (2011). Applied Methods of Cost-effectiveness Analysis in Health Care. Oxford United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. Herner, M. (2019). Perfect Top of the Evidence Hierarchy Pyramid, Maybe Not So Perfect: lessons learned by a novice researcher engaging in a meta-analysis project. BMJ Evid Based Med. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111141 : PMid:30842066 Higgins, J., & Green, S. (Producer). (2011). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. Retrieved from www.cochrane-handbook.org Howick, J., Chalmers, L., Glasziou, P., Greenhalgh, T., Heneghan, C., Liberati, A., . . . Hodgkinson, M. (2011). The Oxford Levels of Evidence 2. Retrieved Marzo 12, 2019, from https://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653 Husereau, D., Drummond, M., Petrou, S., Carswell, C., Moher, D., Greenberg, D., . . . Loder, E. (2013). Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)-- explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force. Value Health, 16(2), 231-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002 : PMid:23538175 INHATA. The International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment. Retrieved Marzo 5, 2019, from http://www.inahta.org/ ISPOR. (2018). Pharmacoeconomic Guidelines Around the World. Retrieved Marzo 18, 2019 from https://tools.ispor.org/peguidelines/ Langer, A. (2012). A framework for assessing Health Economic Evaluation (HEE) quality appraisal instruments. BMC Health Serv Res, 12, 253. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-253 : PMid:22894708 PMCid:PMC3507835 Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gotzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P., . . . Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Plos Med, 6(7), e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 : PMid:19621070 PMCid:PMC2707010 Luhnen, M., Prediger, B., Neugebauer, E. A. M., & Mathes, T. (2019). Systematic reviews of health economic evaluations: A structured analysis of characteristics and methods applied. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1342 : PMid:30761762 Manterola, C., Asenjo-Lobos, C., & Otzen, T. (2014). [Hierarchy of evidence: levels of evidence and grades of recommendation from current use]. Rev Chilena Infectol, 31(6), 705-718. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0716-10182014000600011 : PMid:25679928 Mathes, T., Walgenbach, M., Antoine, S. L., Pieper, D., & Eikermann, M. (2014). Methods for systematic reviews of health economic evaluations: a systematic review, comparison, and synthesis of method literature. Med Decis Making, 34(7), 826-840. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X14526470 : PMid:24713694 Murad, M. H., Asi, N., Alsawas, M., & Alahdab, F. (2016). New evidence pyramid. 21(4), 125-127. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmed-2016-110401 : PMid:27339128 PMCid:PMC4975798 Ng, Y. K. (2004). Welfare Economics: Towards a More complete Analysis. New York - USA: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403944061 PAHO, T. V. (Producer). (2017, Marzo 20 de 2019). Webinar Transferibilidad de evaluaciones económicas. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oE1N35d5mEw Philips, Z., Ginnelly, L., Sculpher, M., Claxton, K., Golder, S., Riemsma, R., . . . Glanville, J. (2004). Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment. Health Technol Assess, 8(36), iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta8360 : PMid:15361314 Pichon-Riviere, A., Augustovski, F., Garcia Marti, S., Sullivan, S. D., & Drummond, M. (2012). Transferability of health technology assessment reports in Latin America: an exploratory survey of researchers and decision makers. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 28(2), 180-186. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462312000074 : PMid:22559762 Pieper, D., Koensgen, N., Breuing, J., Ge, L., & Wegewitz, U. (2018). How is AMSTAR applied by authors - a call for better reporting. BMC Med Res Methodol, 18(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0520-z : PMid:29914386 PMCid:PMC6006845 Pollock, M., Fernandes, R. M., Becker, L. A., Featherstone, R., & Hartling, L. (2016). What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary. Syst Rev, 5(1), 190. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0367-5 : PMid:27842604 PMCid:PMC5109841 Pollock, M., Fernandes, R. M., & Hartling, L. (2017). Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol, 17(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0325-5 : PMid:28335734 PMCid:PMC5364717 RedETSA (Producer). (2017, Marzo 18 2019). Transferibilidad de evaluaciones económicas. Retrieved from http://redetsa.org/wp/?p=3994 Rehfuess, E. A., Stratil, J. M., Scheel, I. B., Portela, A., Norris, S. L., & Baltussen, R. (2019). The WHOINTEGRATE evidence to decision framework version 1.0: integrating WHO norms and values and a complexity perspective. BMJ Glob Health, 4(Suppl 1), e000844. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000844 : PMid:30775012 PMCid:PMC6350705 Rezapour, A., Jafari, A., Mirmasoudi, K., & Talebianpour, H. (2017). Quality Assessment of Published Articles in Iranian Journals Related to Economic Evaluation in Health Care Programs Based on Drummond's Checklist: A Narrative Review. Iran J Med Sci, 42(5), 427-436. Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M., Gray, J. A., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ, 312, 71-72. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71 : PMid:8555924 PMCid:PMC2349778 Shea, B. J., Grimshaw, J. M., Wells, G. A., Boers, M., Andersson, N., Hamel, C., . . . Bouter, L. M. (2007). Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol, 7, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-10 : PMid:17302989 PMCid:PMC1810543 Shea, B. J., Hamel, C., Wells, G. A., Bouter, L. M., Kristjansson, E., Grimshaw, J., . . . Boers, M. (2009). AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol, 62(10), 1013-1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009 : PMid:19230606 Shea, B. J., Reeves, B. C., Wells, G., Thuku, M., Hamel, C., Moran, J., . . . Henry, D. A. (2017). AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or nonrandomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ, 358, j4008. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008 : PMid:28935701 PMCid:PMC5833365 Shemilt, I., McDaid, D., Marsh, K., Henderson, C., Bertranou, E., Mallander, J., . . . Vale, L. (2013). Issues in the incorporation of economic perspectives and evidence into Cochrane reviews. Syst Rev, 2, 83. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-83 : PMid:24050504 PMCid:PMC3849717 SIGN, G. (2011). SIGN 50 A guideline developer's handbook. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network SIGN Retrieved from https://www.sign.ac.uk/assets/sign50_2011.pdf Smith, V., Devane, D., Begley, C. M., & Clarke, M. (2011). Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol, 11(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-15 : PMid:21291558 PMCid:PMC3039637 Soto-Alvarez, J. (2012). Evaluación económica de medicamentos y tecnologías sanitarias: Principios, métodos y aplicaciones en política sanitaria. (S. A. U. Springer SBM Spain Ed.). Madrid, España. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-84-940346-6-4 : PMid:23513484 Tan-Torres, E., Baltusen, R., Adam, T., Hutubessy, R., Acharya, A., Evans, D., & Murray, C. J. L. (2003). Making choices in health: WHO Guide to Cost-effectiveness Analysis. from https://www.who.int/choice/publications/p_2003_generalised_cea.pdf Thielen, F. W., Van Mastrigt, G., Burgers, L. T., Bramer, W. M., Majoie, H., Evers, S., & Kleijnen, J. (2016). How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for clinical practice guidelines: database selection and search strategy development (part 2/3). Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, 16(6), 705-721. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2016.1246962 : PMid:27805466 Thulliez, M., Angoulvant, D., Pisella, P. J., & Bejan-Angoulvant, T. (2018). Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses on Systemic Adverse Events Associated With Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Medication Use. JAMA Ophthalmol, 136(5), 557-566. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.0002 : PMid:29566105 Urrutia, G., & Bonfill, X. (2010). [PRISMA declaration: a proposal to improve the publication of systematic reviews and meta-analyses]. Med Clin (Barc), 135(11), 507-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2010.01.015 : PMid:20206945 van Mastrigt, G. A., Hiligsmann, M., Arts, J. J., Broos, P. H., Kleijnen, J., Evers, S. M., & Majoie, M. H. (2016). How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: a five-step approach (part 1/3). Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, 16(6), 689-704. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2016.1246960 : PMid:27805469 Walker, D. G., Wilson, R. F., Sharma, R., Bridges, J., Niessen, L., Bass, E. B., & Frick, K. (2012). Best Practices for Conducting Economic Evaluations in Health Care: A Systematic Review of Quality Assessment Tools: The Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center. WHO, W. H. O. (2008). WHO guide for standardization of economic evaluations of immunization programmes (V. a. B. Department of Immunization, Trans.). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. Wijnen, B., Van Mastrigt, G., Redekop, W. K., Majoie, H., De Kinderen, R., & Evers, S. (2016). How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: data extraction, risk of bias, and transferability (part 3/3). Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, 16(6), 723-732. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2016.1246961 : PMid:27762640
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv	Panorama Económico - 2019
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv	Panorama Económico - 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad de Cartagena
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.unicartagena.edu.co/index.php/panoramaeconomico/article/view/2583
institution	Universidad de Cartagena
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://repositorio.unicartagena.edu.co/bitstreams/8c4f44da-49f1-43b4-8277-ed085672418d/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	245267400b9db10f7420cfae4679e677
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Biblioteca Digital Universidad de Cartagena
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_	1814214157456637952
spelling	Castañeda Guerrero, CarolinaDe la Hoz Restrepo, FernandoAlvis Guzmán, Nelson2019-07-01 00:00:002019-07-01 00:00:002019-07-010122-8900https://hdl.handle.net/11227/1384610.32997/2463-0470-vol.27-num.3-2019-25832463-0470https://doi.org/10.32997/2463-0470-vol.27-num.3-2019-2583application/pdfspaUniversidad de CartagenaPanorama Económicohttps://revistas.unicartagena.edu.co/index.php/panoramaeconomico/article/download/2583/2161Núm. 3 , Año 2019597358127Adarkwah, C. C., van Gils, P. F., Hiligsmann, M., & Evers, S. M. (2016). Risk of bias in model-based economic evaluations: the ECOBIAS checklist. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, 16(4), 513-523. https://doi.org/10.1586/14737167.2015.1103185 : PMid:26588001Akers J, Aguiar-Ibáñez R, Baba-Akbari A, Beynon S, Booth A, Burch J, . . . Fonseca T. (2009). Systematic Reviews of Economic EvaluationsSystematic Reviews. CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care.: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York. Retrieved from http://www.york.ac.uk/crd/SysRev/!SSL!/WebHelp/SysRev3.htmAnderson, R. (2010). Systematic reviews of economic evaluations: utility or futility? Health Econ, 19(3), 350-364. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1486 : PMid:19378354Atehortua, S., Ceballos, M., Gaviria, C. F., & Mejia, A. (2013). [Quality assessment of economic evaluations in health care in Colombia: a systematic review]. Biomedica, 33(4), 615-630. https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.v33i4.1536 : PMid:24652216Atkins, D., Best, D., Briss, P. A., Eccles, M., Falck-Ytter, Y., Flottorp, S., . . . Zaza, S. (2004). Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 328(7454), 1490. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490 : PMid:15205295 PMCid:PMC428525Augustovski, F., García Martí, S., & Pichon-Riviere, A. (2013). Estándares Consolidados de Reporte de Evaluaciones Económicas Sanitarias: Versión en Español de la Lista de Comprobación CHEERS. Value in Health Regional Issues, 2(3), 338-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vhri.2013.10.004 : PMid:29702767Borgerson, K. (2009). Valuing evidence: bias and the evidence hierarchy of evidence-based medicine. Perspect Biol Med, 52(2), 218-233. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.0.0086 : PMid:19395821Briggs A, C. K., Sculper M,. (2007). Decision modelling for health economic evaluation. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.Brouwer, W. B., Culyer, A. J., van Exel, N. J., & Rutten, F. F. (2008). Welfarism vs. extra-welfarism. J Health Econ, 27(2), 325-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.07.003 : PMid:18179835Brunetti, M., Shemilt, I., Pregno, S., Vale, L., Oxman, A. D., Lord, J., . . . Schunemann, H. J. (2013). GRADE guidelines: 10. Considering resource use and rating the quality of economic evidence. J Clin Epidemiol, 66(2), 140-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.04.012 : PMid:22863410Cochrane Website. Cochrane Collaboration. Retrieved Marzo 7, 2019, from https://www.cochrane.org/about-usCooper, N., Coyle, D., Abrams, K., Mugford, M., & Sutton, A. (2005). Use of evidence in decision models: an appraisal of health technology assessments in the UK since 1997. J Health Serv Res Policy, 10(4), 245-250. https://doi.org/10.1258/135581905774414187 : PMid:16259692Chaikledkaew, U., & Kittrongsiri, K. (2014). Quality assessment of health economic evaluation. J Med Assoc Thai, 97 Suppl 5, S113-118.Drummond, M., Barbieri, M., Cook, J., Glick, H. A., Lis, J., Malik, F., . . . Severens, J. (2009). Transferability of economic evaluations across jurisdictions: ISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force report. Value Health, 12(4), 409-418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00489.x : PMid:19900249Drummond, M. F., & Jefferson, T. O. (1996). Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. The BMJ Economic Evaluation Working Party. BMJ, 313(7052), 275-283. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7052.275 : PMid:8704542 PMCid:PMC2351717.Drummond MF, S. M., Claxton K, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW (2015). Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Oxford - United Kingdom.EunetHTA. (2015). Methods for health economic evaluations - A guideline based on current practices in Europe. Retrieved marzo 23, 2019, from https://www.eunethta.eu/wpcontent/uploads/2018/03/Methods_for_health_economic_evaluations.pdfEvers, S., Goossens, M., de Vet, H., van Tulder, M., & Ament, A. (2005). Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: Consensus on Health Economic Criteria. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 21(2), 240-245. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462305050324 : PMid:15921065García Fariñas, A., García Rodríguez, J. F., Gálvez González, A. M., & Jimenez López, G. (2016). Calidad metodológica de las evaluaciones económicas completas, publicadas en revistas médicas cubanas (1999-2014). Revista Cubana de Salud Pública, 42, 183-192.Gomersall, J. S., Jadotte, Y. T., Xue, Y., Lockwood, S., Riddle, D., & Preda, A. (2014). The Systematic Review of Economic Evaluation Evidence.: The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers' Manual 2014.Gomersall, J. S., Jadotte, Y. T., Xue, Y., Lockwood, S., Riddle, D., & Preda, A. (2015). Conducting systematic reviews of economic evaluations. Int J Evid Based Healthc, 13(3), 170-178. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000063 : PMid:26288063Gray, A. M. C., P.M.; Wolstenholme, J.L.; Wordsworth S. (2011). Applied Methods of Cost-effectiveness Analysis in Health Care. Oxford United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.Herner, M. (2019). Perfect Top of the Evidence Hierarchy Pyramid, Maybe Not So Perfect: lessons learned by a novice researcher engaging in a meta-analysis project. BMJ Evid Based Med. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111141 : PMid:30842066Higgins, J., & Green, S. (Producer). (2011). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. Retrieved from www.cochrane-handbook.orgHowick, J., Chalmers, L., Glasziou, P., Greenhalgh, T., Heneghan, C., Liberati, A., . . . Hodgkinson, M. (2011). The Oxford Levels of Evidence 2. Retrieved Marzo 12, 2019, from https://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653Husereau, D., Drummond, M., Petrou, S., Carswell, C., Moher, D., Greenberg, D., . . . Loder, E. (2013). Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)-- explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force. Value Health, 16(2), 231-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002 : PMid:23538175INHATA. The International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment. Retrieved Marzo 5, 2019, from http://www.inahta.org/ISPOR. (2018). Pharmacoeconomic Guidelines Around the World. Retrieved Marzo 18, 2019 from https://tools.ispor.org/peguidelines/Langer, A. (2012). A framework for assessing Health Economic Evaluation (HEE) quality appraisal instruments. BMC Health Serv Res, 12, 253. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-253 : PMid:22894708 PMCid:PMC3507835Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gotzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P., . . . Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Plos Med, 6(7), e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 : PMid:19621070 PMCid:PMC2707010Luhnen, M., Prediger, B., Neugebauer, E. A. M., & Mathes, T. (2019). Systematic reviews of health economic evaluations: A structured analysis of characteristics and methods applied. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1342 : PMid:30761762Manterola, C., Asenjo-Lobos, C., & Otzen, T. (2014). [Hierarchy of evidence: levels of evidence and grades of recommendation from current use]. Rev Chilena Infectol, 31(6), 705-718. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0716-10182014000600011 : PMid:25679928Mathes, T., Walgenbach, M., Antoine, S. L., Pieper, D., & Eikermann, M. (2014). Methods for systematic reviews of health economic evaluations: a systematic review, comparison, and synthesis of method literature. Med Decis Making, 34(7), 826-840. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X14526470 : PMid:24713694Murad, M. H., Asi, N., Alsawas, M., & Alahdab, F. (2016). New evidence pyramid. 21(4), 125-127. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmed-2016-110401 : PMid:27339128 PMCid:PMC4975798Ng, Y. K. (2004). Welfare Economics: Towards a More complete Analysis. New York - USA: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403944061PAHO, T. V. (Producer). (2017, Marzo 20 de 2019). Webinar Transferibilidad de evaluaciones económicas. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oE1N35d5mEwPhilips, Z., Ginnelly, L., Sculpher, M., Claxton, K., Golder, S., Riemsma, R., . . . Glanville, J. (2004). Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment. Health Technol Assess, 8(36), iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta8360 : PMid:15361314Pichon-Riviere, A., Augustovski, F., Garcia Marti, S., Sullivan, S. D., & Drummond, M. (2012). Transferability of health technology assessment reports in Latin America: an exploratory survey of researchers and decision makers. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 28(2), 180-186. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462312000074 : PMid:22559762Pieper, D., Koensgen, N., Breuing, J., Ge, L., & Wegewitz, U. (2018). How is AMSTAR applied by authors - a call for better reporting. BMC Med Res Methodol, 18(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0520-z : PMid:29914386 PMCid:PMC6006845Pollock, M., Fernandes, R. M., Becker, L. A., Featherstone, R., & Hartling, L. (2016). What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary. Syst Rev, 5(1), 190. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0367-5 : PMid:27842604 PMCid:PMC5109841Pollock, M., Fernandes, R. M., & Hartling, L. (2017). Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol, 17(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0325-5 : PMid:28335734 PMCid:PMC5364717RedETSA (Producer). (2017, Marzo 18 2019). Transferibilidad de evaluaciones económicas. Retrieved from http://redetsa.org/wp/?p=3994Rehfuess, E. A., Stratil, J. M., Scheel, I. B., Portela, A., Norris, S. L., & Baltussen, R. (2019). The WHOINTEGRATE evidence to decision framework version 1.0: integrating WHO norms and values and a complexity perspective. BMJ Glob Health, 4(Suppl 1), e000844. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000844 : PMid:30775012 PMCid:PMC6350705Rezapour, A., Jafari, A., Mirmasoudi, K., & Talebianpour, H. (2017). Quality Assessment of Published Articles in Iranian Journals Related to Economic Evaluation in Health Care Programs Based on Drummond's Checklist: A Narrative Review. Iran J Med Sci, 42(5), 427-436.Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M., Gray, J. A., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ, 312, 71-72. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71 : PMid:8555924 PMCid:PMC2349778Shea, B. J., Grimshaw, J. M., Wells, G. A., Boers, M., Andersson, N., Hamel, C., . . . Bouter, L. M. (2007). Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol, 7, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-10 : PMid:17302989 PMCid:PMC1810543Shea, B. J., Hamel, C., Wells, G. A., Bouter, L. M., Kristjansson, E., Grimshaw, J., . . . Boers, M. (2009). AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol, 62(10), 1013-1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009 : PMid:19230606Shea, B. J., Reeves, B. C., Wells, G., Thuku, M., Hamel, C., Moran, J., . . . Henry, D. A. (2017). AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or nonrandomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ, 358, j4008. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008 : PMid:28935701 PMCid:PMC5833365Shemilt, I., McDaid, D., Marsh, K., Henderson, C., Bertranou, E., Mallander, J., . . . Vale, L. (2013). Issues in the incorporation of economic perspectives and evidence into Cochrane reviews. Syst Rev, 2, 83. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-83 : PMid:24050504 PMCid:PMC3849717SIGN, G. (2011). SIGN 50 A guideline developer's handbook. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network SIGN Retrieved from https://www.sign.ac.uk/assets/sign50_2011.pdfSmith, V., Devane, D., Begley, C. M., & Clarke, M. (2011). Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol, 11(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-15 : PMid:21291558 PMCid:PMC3039637Soto-Alvarez, J. (2012). Evaluación económica de medicamentos y tecnologías sanitarias: Principios, métodos y aplicaciones en política sanitaria. (S. A. U. Springer SBM Spain Ed.). Madrid, España. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-84-940346-6-4 : PMid:23513484Tan-Torres, E., Baltusen, R., Adam, T., Hutubessy, R., Acharya, A., Evans, D., & Murray, C. J. L. (2003). Making choices in health: WHO Guide to Cost-effectiveness Analysis. from https://www.who.int/choice/publications/p_2003_generalised_cea.pdfThielen, F. W., Van Mastrigt, G., Burgers, L. T., Bramer, W. M., Majoie, H., Evers, S., & Kleijnen, J. (2016). How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for clinical practice guidelines: database selection and search strategy development (part 2/3). Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, 16(6), 705-721. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2016.1246962 : PMid:27805466Thulliez, M., Angoulvant, D., Pisella, P. J., & Bejan-Angoulvant, T. (2018). Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses on Systemic Adverse Events Associated With Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Medication Use. JAMA Ophthalmol, 136(5), 557-566. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.0002 : PMid:29566105Urrutia, G., & Bonfill, X. (2010). [PRISMA declaration: a proposal to improve the publication of systematic reviews and meta-analyses]. Med Clin (Barc), 135(11), 507-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2010.01.015 : PMid:20206945van Mastrigt, G. A., Hiligsmann, M., Arts, J. J., Broos, P. H., Kleijnen, J., Evers, S. M., & Majoie, M. H. (2016). How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: a five-step approach (part 1/3). Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, 16(6), 689-704. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2016.1246960 : PMid:27805469Walker, D. G., Wilson, R. F., Sharma, R., Bridges, J., Niessen, L., Bass, E. B., & Frick, K. (2012). Best Practices for Conducting Economic Evaluations in Health Care: A Systematic Review of Quality Assessment Tools: The Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center.WHO, W. H. O. (2008). WHO guide for standardization of economic evaluations of immunization programmes (V. a. B. Department of Immunization, Trans.). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.Wijnen, B., Van Mastrigt, G., Redekop, W. K., Majoie, H., De Kinderen, R., & Evers, S. (2016). How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: data extraction, risk of bias, and transferability (part 3/3). Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, 16(6), 723-732. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2016.1246961 : PMid:27762640Panorama Económico - 2019https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEsta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.https://revistas.unicartagena.edu.co/index.php/panoramaeconomico/article/view/2583Health technologiesSystematic reviewEconomic evaluationQualityQuality assessmentTecnologías sanitariasTecnologías en saludRevisiones sistemáticasEvaluaciones económicasCalidadEvaluación calidadTechnologies de la santéRevue systématiqueÉvaluation économiqueQualitéÉvaluation qualitéCalidad en revisiones sistemáticas de evaluaciones económicas de tecnologías en salud.Quality in systematic reviews of economic evaluations of health technologies.Artículo de revistainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlePublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2579https://repositorio.unicartagena.edu.co/bitstreams/8c4f44da-49f1-43b4-8277-ed085672418d/download245267400b9db10f7420cfae4679e677MD5111227/13846oai:repositorio.unicartagena.edu.co:11227/138462024-09-05 15:19:41.195https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0Panorama Económico - 2019metadata.onlyhttps://repositorio.unicartagena.edu.coBiblioteca Digital Universidad de Cartagenabdigital@metabiblioteca.com

Calidad en revisiones sistemáticas de evaluaciones económicas de tecnologías en salud.

Publicaciones similares