Relación entre la aparición de los pliegues conjuntivales paralelos al parpado (LIPCOF) y epiteliopatía del parpado en efecto parabrisas (LWE) asociados al uso de LC
The appearance of conjunctival folds parallel to the eyelid (LIPCOF) and epitheliopathy of the eyelid in effect windshield (LWE) are caused by the friction that occurred during blinking, due to the instability of the tear film that being in presence with another surface as a contact lens will occur...
- Autores:
-
Pérez Molina, Daniela Katherinne
- Tipo de recurso:
- Trabajo de grado de pregrado
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2020
- Institución:
- Universidad Antonio Nariño
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio UAN
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.uan.edu.co:123456789/2346
- Acceso en línea:
- http://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/2346
- Palabra clave:
- LWE; LIPCOF; LENTES DE CONTACTO
LWE; LIPCOF; CONTACT LENSES
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
id |
UAntonioN2_b9d6ac473346d75e161f5e988004a703 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.uan.edu.co:123456789/2346 |
network_acronym_str |
UAntonioN2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio UAN |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.es_ES.fl_str_mv |
Relación entre la aparición de los pliegues conjuntivales paralelos al parpado (LIPCOF) y epiteliopatía del parpado en efecto parabrisas (LWE) asociados al uso de LC |
title |
Relación entre la aparición de los pliegues conjuntivales paralelos al parpado (LIPCOF) y epiteliopatía del parpado en efecto parabrisas (LWE) asociados al uso de LC |
spellingShingle |
Relación entre la aparición de los pliegues conjuntivales paralelos al parpado (LIPCOF) y epiteliopatía del parpado en efecto parabrisas (LWE) asociados al uso de LC LWE; LIPCOF; LENTES DE CONTACTO LWE; LIPCOF; CONTACT LENSES |
title_short |
Relación entre la aparición de los pliegues conjuntivales paralelos al parpado (LIPCOF) y epiteliopatía del parpado en efecto parabrisas (LWE) asociados al uso de LC |
title_full |
Relación entre la aparición de los pliegues conjuntivales paralelos al parpado (LIPCOF) y epiteliopatía del parpado en efecto parabrisas (LWE) asociados al uso de LC |
title_fullStr |
Relación entre la aparición de los pliegues conjuntivales paralelos al parpado (LIPCOF) y epiteliopatía del parpado en efecto parabrisas (LWE) asociados al uso de LC |
title_full_unstemmed |
Relación entre la aparición de los pliegues conjuntivales paralelos al parpado (LIPCOF) y epiteliopatía del parpado en efecto parabrisas (LWE) asociados al uso de LC |
title_sort |
Relación entre la aparición de los pliegues conjuntivales paralelos al parpado (LIPCOF) y epiteliopatía del parpado en efecto parabrisas (LWE) asociados al uso de LC |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Pérez Molina, Daniela Katherinne |
dc.contributor.advisor.spa.fl_str_mv |
Garzón Parra, Johanna |
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv |
Pérez Molina, Daniela Katherinne |
dc.subject.es_ES.fl_str_mv |
LWE; LIPCOF; LENTES DE CONTACTO |
topic |
LWE; LIPCOF; LENTES DE CONTACTO LWE; LIPCOF; CONTACT LENSES |
dc.subject.keyword.es_ES.fl_str_mv |
LWE; LIPCOF; CONTACT LENSES |
description |
The appearance of conjunctival folds parallel to the eyelid (LIPCOF) and epitheliopathy of the eyelid in effect windshield (LWE) are caused by the friction that occurred during blinking, due to the instability of the tear film that being in presence with another surface as a contact lens will occur more quickly, because it will also depend on the characteristics of the same. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.issued.spa.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-03 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-03-02T22:36:50Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-03-02T22:36:50Z |
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Trabajo de grado (Pregrado y/o Especialización) |
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f |
dc.type.coarversion.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/2346 |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation.spa.fl_str_mv |
1. Dumbleton B, Caffery M, Dogru S, Curran H, Kern J, Kojima P, Morgan, Purslow, Robertson D, Nelson J. Members of the TFOS in- ternational workshop on contact lens discomfort, The TFOS international workshop on contact lens discomfort: report of the subcommittee on epidemiology, Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 54 (2013) 20–36. 2. Nichols J, Willcox M, Bron A, Belmonte C, Ciolino J, Craig J, Dogru M, Foulks, Jones L, Nelson J, Nichols K, Purslow C, Schaumberg D, Stapleton F, Sullivan D. Members of the TFOS international workshop on contact lens discomfort, The TFOS international workshop on contact lens discomfort: executive summary, Invest Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 54 (2013) 7–13. 3. Guillon M, Maissa C. Dry eye symptomatology of soft contact lens wearers and nonwearers, Optom. Vis. Sci. 82 (2005) 829–834. 4. Papas E, Tilia D, Tomlinson D, Williams J, Chan E, Chan J, Golebiowski B. Consequences of wear interruption for discomfort with contact lenses, Optom. Vis. Sci. 91 (2014) 24–31. 5. Nichols K, Nichols J, Mitchell G. The lack of association between signs and symptoms in patients with dry eye disease, Cornea 23 (2004) 762–770. 6. Martin D. Water transport in dehydrating hydrogel contact lenses: implications for corneal desiccation, J. Biomed. Mater. Res A. 29 (1995) 857–865. 7. Pult H, Bandlitz S. Lid-parallel conjunctival folds and their ability to predict dry eye, Eye Contact Lens 44 (Suppl 2) (2017) 113–119 8. Xiang H, Zhang X, Zhang Z, Li S, Wang H, Han Z, Zhou H, Jia Y, Chen X. Expressions of matrix metalloproteinases 1 and 3 and their tissue inhibitors in the conjunctival tissue and fibroblasts cultured from conjunctivochalasis. Int J Ophthalmol. 2017;10(4):555 9. (S.N).Revista Imagen óptica. Epiteliopatía del parpado en limpiaparabrisas. 2014.disponible en: https://issuu.com/imagenoptica/docs/revista_91/68 10. Pult H, Riede-Pult BH. Impact of soft contact lenses on lid- parallel conjunctival folds. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2019 Aug 1;42(4):415–9 11. Bandlitz S, Purslow C, Murphy J, Pult H. Lid-parallel conjunctival fold (LIPCOF) morphology imaged by optical coherence tomography and its relationship to LIPCOF grade. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2019 Jun 1;42(3):299–303 12. Zimmerman A. Complicaciones Cl contemporáneas. Contact lens spectrum. Volumen 33; 2018 página (s): 20-25,27 13. Li W, Yeh T, Leung T, Yuen T, Lerma M, Lin MC. The Relationship of Lid Wiper Epitheliopathy to Ocular Surface Signs and Symptoms. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018; 59(5):1878-1887. doi:10.1167/iovs.17-23639 14. Muntz, Lakshman, Subbaraman, Craig, Jones. Cytomorphological assessment of the lid margin in relation to symptoms, contact lens wear and lid wiper epitheliopathy. The Ocular Surface. Volume 18, Issue 2, April 2020, Pages 214-220 15. Deng Z, Wang J, Jiang H, et al. Lid Wiper Microvascular Responses as an Indicator of Contact Lens Discomfort. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016; 170:197-205. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2016.08.009 16. Woods J. Conjunctival Responses to Contact Lens Wear. Contact Lens Spectrum, Volume: 30;2015, page (s): 34-36,38 17. Evans K, Pult H. ¿ Qué importancia tienen las propiedades las lentes de contacto ?. 2014;1–4. Available from: www.jnjvisioncare.es 18. Boyd K. Lentes de contacto. American academy of ophthalmology. 2020. Disponible en : https://www.aao.org/salud-ocular/anteojos-lentes-de-contacto/lentes-de-contacto 19. Craig J, Nelson J, Azar D, Belmonte C, Bron A, Chauhan S. TFOS DEWS II Report Executive Summary. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(4):802–12 20. D.E.W.S. DEWS Definicion y clasificacion e la Enfermedad del ojo seco [Internet]. Vol. 5. 2007. Available from: http://www.tearfilm.org/dewsreport_Spanish/ 21. Knop N, Korb D, Blackie C, Knop E. The lid wiper contains goblet cells and goblet cell crypts for ocular surface lubrication during the blink. Cornea. 2012 Jun;31(6):668–79. 22. Graue E. Oftalmología en la práctica de la medicina general 4ta edicion [Internet]. Uiversidad. Mexico; 2014 [cited 2019 Nov 17]. 360 p. Available from: https://accessmedicina.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?bookid=1498§ionid=99961490#undefined 23. Pellegrini G, Golisano O, Paterna P, Lambiase A, Bonini S, Rama P, et al. Location and clonal analysis of stem cells and their differentiated progeny in the human ocular surface. J Cell Biol. 1999;145(4):769–82. 24. Dartt DA. Regulation of mucin and fluid secretion by conjunctival epithelial cells [Internet]. Vol. 21, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research. 2002 [cited 2019 Nov 17]. p. 555–76. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12433377 25. Argüeso P, Gipson I. Epithelial mucins of the ocular surface: Structure, biosynthesis and function. Vol. 73, Experimental Eye Research. Academic Press. 2001. p. 281–9 26. Levin M, Verkman A. Aquaporin-dependent water permeation at the mouse ocular surface: In vivo microfluorimetric measurements in cornea and conjunctiva. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Dec;45(12):4423–32 27. Boston TF& OSS. TFOS DEWS II REPORT - Informe de fisiopatología - TFOS - Tear Film & Ocular Surface Society [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2019 Nov 16]. Available from: https://www.tfosdewsreport.org/report-informe_de_fisiopatologa/106_36/es/ 28. The Vision Care Institute. Examen con lámpara de hendidura. Prácticas esenciales con lentes contacto [Internet]. 2012; 23–56. Available from: https://www.jnjvisioncare.es/sites/default/files/public/es/documents/educational_moments/1/examen_lampara_hendidura.pdf 29. Barrero J. Lacrimal P. Película lacrimal: bioquímica y fisiología. Rev la Fac Med. 1986;40(2):203–21 30. López J, García I, Martínez J. Estudio de los pliegues lacunares en el diagnóstico de ojo seco. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol [Internet]. 2003 [cited 2019 Nov 16]; 78(1). Available from: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0365-66912003000100006 31. Tapasztó B, Veres A, Kosina-Hagyó K, Somfai G, Németh J. OCT imaging of lid-parallel conjunctival folds in soft contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci. 2011 Oct; 88(10):1206–13. 32. Solorzano A, Alvarez L, Moncaleano J. Epiteliopatía del borde palpebral en limpiaparabrisas. Revista grupo franja. 2018. Available from: https://grupofranja2.com/index.php/oftalmologia/item/2249-epiteliopatia-del-borde-palpebral-en-limpia-parabrisashttps://riuma.uma.es/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10630/12831/TD_GUIJARRO_HERNNDEZ_Luisa.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y 33. Pult H, Riede-Pult BH. Impact of conjunctival folds on central tear meniscus height. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015; 56(3):1459–66. 34. Jones M, Fulford G, Please C, McElwain D, Collins M. Elastohydrodynamics of the eyelid wiper. Bull Math Biol. 2008 Feb;70(2):323–43 35. Pinto F, Garrote J, Vela A, Calonge M, Gonzalez J. Técnicas diagnósticas para el síndrome de ojo seco (I). Ocul Surf. 2011; 465(I):11. 36. Maastricht ERI. CCLRU Grading Scales 37. Manzini J. Declaración De Helsinki: Principios Éticos Para La Investigación Médica Sobre Sujetos Humanos. Acta Bioeth. 2000;6(2):321–34 38. J&J. Como manejar a los pacientes con epiteliopatía en efecto parabrisas (LWE). The visión care institute. Retrieved from: https://www.jnjvisioncare.es/sites/default/files/public/es/documents/educational_moments/LWE/acu158_educational_moments_2_v4_2.pdf |
url |
http://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/2346 |
identifier_str_mv |
1. Dumbleton B, Caffery M, Dogru S, Curran H, Kern J, Kojima P, Morgan, Purslow, Robertson D, Nelson J. Members of the TFOS in- ternational workshop on contact lens discomfort, The TFOS international workshop on contact lens discomfort: report of the subcommittee on epidemiology, Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 54 (2013) 20–36. 2. Nichols J, Willcox M, Bron A, Belmonte C, Ciolino J, Craig J, Dogru M, Foulks, Jones L, Nelson J, Nichols K, Purslow C, Schaumberg D, Stapleton F, Sullivan D. Members of the TFOS international workshop on contact lens discomfort, The TFOS international workshop on contact lens discomfort: executive summary, Invest Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 54 (2013) 7–13. 3. Guillon M, Maissa C. Dry eye symptomatology of soft contact lens wearers and nonwearers, Optom. Vis. Sci. 82 (2005) 829–834. 4. Papas E, Tilia D, Tomlinson D, Williams J, Chan E, Chan J, Golebiowski B. Consequences of wear interruption for discomfort with contact lenses, Optom. Vis. Sci. 91 (2014) 24–31. 5. Nichols K, Nichols J, Mitchell G. The lack of association between signs and symptoms in patients with dry eye disease, Cornea 23 (2004) 762–770. 6. Martin D. Water transport in dehydrating hydrogel contact lenses: implications for corneal desiccation, J. Biomed. Mater. Res A. 29 (1995) 857–865. 7. Pult H, Bandlitz S. Lid-parallel conjunctival folds and their ability to predict dry eye, Eye Contact Lens 44 (Suppl 2) (2017) 113–119 8. Xiang H, Zhang X, Zhang Z, Li S, Wang H, Han Z, Zhou H, Jia Y, Chen X. Expressions of matrix metalloproteinases 1 and 3 and their tissue inhibitors in the conjunctival tissue and fibroblasts cultured from conjunctivochalasis. Int J Ophthalmol. 2017;10(4):555 9. (S.N).Revista Imagen óptica. Epiteliopatía del parpado en limpiaparabrisas. 2014.disponible en: https://issuu.com/imagenoptica/docs/revista_91/68 10. Pult H, Riede-Pult BH. Impact of soft contact lenses on lid- parallel conjunctival folds. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2019 Aug 1;42(4):415–9 11. Bandlitz S, Purslow C, Murphy J, Pult H. Lid-parallel conjunctival fold (LIPCOF) morphology imaged by optical coherence tomography and its relationship to LIPCOF grade. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2019 Jun 1;42(3):299–303 12. Zimmerman A. Complicaciones Cl contemporáneas. Contact lens spectrum. Volumen 33; 2018 página (s): 20-25,27 13. Li W, Yeh T, Leung T, Yuen T, Lerma M, Lin MC. The Relationship of Lid Wiper Epitheliopathy to Ocular Surface Signs and Symptoms. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018; 59(5):1878-1887. doi:10.1167/iovs.17-23639 14. Muntz, Lakshman, Subbaraman, Craig, Jones. Cytomorphological assessment of the lid margin in relation to symptoms, contact lens wear and lid wiper epitheliopathy. The Ocular Surface. Volume 18, Issue 2, April 2020, Pages 214-220 15. Deng Z, Wang J, Jiang H, et al. Lid Wiper Microvascular Responses as an Indicator of Contact Lens Discomfort. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016; 170:197-205. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2016.08.009 16. Woods J. Conjunctival Responses to Contact Lens Wear. Contact Lens Spectrum, Volume: 30;2015, page (s): 34-36,38 17. Evans K, Pult H. ¿ Qué importancia tienen las propiedades las lentes de contacto ?. 2014;1–4. Available from: www.jnjvisioncare.es 18. Boyd K. Lentes de contacto. American academy of ophthalmology. 2020. Disponible en : https://www.aao.org/salud-ocular/anteojos-lentes-de-contacto/lentes-de-contacto 19. Craig J, Nelson J, Azar D, Belmonte C, Bron A, Chauhan S. TFOS DEWS II Report Executive Summary. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(4):802–12 20. D.E.W.S. DEWS Definicion y clasificacion e la Enfermedad del ojo seco [Internet]. Vol. 5. 2007. Available from: http://www.tearfilm.org/dewsreport_Spanish/ 21. Knop N, Korb D, Blackie C, Knop E. The lid wiper contains goblet cells and goblet cell crypts for ocular surface lubrication during the blink. Cornea. 2012 Jun;31(6):668–79. 22. Graue E. Oftalmología en la práctica de la medicina general 4ta edicion [Internet]. Uiversidad. Mexico; 2014 [cited 2019 Nov 17]. 360 p. Available from: https://accessmedicina.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?bookid=1498§ionid=99961490#undefined 23. Pellegrini G, Golisano O, Paterna P, Lambiase A, Bonini S, Rama P, et al. Location and clonal analysis of stem cells and their differentiated progeny in the human ocular surface. J Cell Biol. 1999;145(4):769–82. 24. Dartt DA. Regulation of mucin and fluid secretion by conjunctival epithelial cells [Internet]. Vol. 21, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research. 2002 [cited 2019 Nov 17]. p. 555–76. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12433377 25. Argüeso P, Gipson I. Epithelial mucins of the ocular surface: Structure, biosynthesis and function. Vol. 73, Experimental Eye Research. Academic Press. 2001. p. 281–9 26. Levin M, Verkman A. Aquaporin-dependent water permeation at the mouse ocular surface: In vivo microfluorimetric measurements in cornea and conjunctiva. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Dec;45(12):4423–32 27. Boston TF& OSS. TFOS DEWS II REPORT - Informe de fisiopatología - TFOS - Tear Film & Ocular Surface Society [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2019 Nov 16]. Available from: https://www.tfosdewsreport.org/report-informe_de_fisiopatologa/106_36/es/ 28. The Vision Care Institute. Examen con lámpara de hendidura. Prácticas esenciales con lentes contacto [Internet]. 2012; 23–56. Available from: https://www.jnjvisioncare.es/sites/default/files/public/es/documents/educational_moments/1/examen_lampara_hendidura.pdf 29. Barrero J. Lacrimal P. Película lacrimal: bioquímica y fisiología. Rev la Fac Med. 1986;40(2):203–21 30. López J, García I, Martínez J. Estudio de los pliegues lacunares en el diagnóstico de ojo seco. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol [Internet]. 2003 [cited 2019 Nov 16]; 78(1). Available from: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0365-66912003000100006 31. Tapasztó B, Veres A, Kosina-Hagyó K, Somfai G, Németh J. OCT imaging of lid-parallel conjunctival folds in soft contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci. 2011 Oct; 88(10):1206–13. 32. Solorzano A, Alvarez L, Moncaleano J. Epiteliopatía del borde palpebral en limpiaparabrisas. Revista grupo franja. 2018. Available from: https://grupofranja2.com/index.php/oftalmologia/item/2249-epiteliopatia-del-borde-palpebral-en-limpia-parabrisashttps://riuma.uma.es/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10630/12831/TD_GUIJARRO_HERNNDEZ_Luisa.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y 33. Pult H, Riede-Pult BH. Impact of conjunctival folds on central tear meniscus height. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015; 56(3):1459–66. 34. Jones M, Fulford G, Please C, McElwain D, Collins M. Elastohydrodynamics of the eyelid wiper. Bull Math Biol. 2008 Feb;70(2):323–43 35. Pinto F, Garrote J, Vela A, Calonge M, Gonzalez J. Técnicas diagnósticas para el síndrome de ojo seco (I). Ocul Surf. 2011; 465(I):11. 36. Maastricht ERI. CCLRU Grading Scales 37. Manzini J. Declaración De Helsinki: Principios Éticos Para La Investigación Médica Sobre Sujetos Humanos. Acta Bioeth. 2000;6(2):321–34 38. J&J. Como manejar a los pacientes con epiteliopatía en efecto parabrisas (LWE). The visión care institute. Retrieved from: https://www.jnjvisioncare.es/sites/default/files/public/es/documents/educational_moments/LWE/acu158_educational_moments_2_v4_2.pdf |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Acceso abierto |
dc.rights.license.spa.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) |
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) Acceso abierto https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Antonio Nariño |
dc.publisher.program.spa.fl_str_mv |
Optometría |
dc.publisher.faculty.spa.fl_str_mv |
Facultad de Optometría |
dc.publisher.campus.spa.fl_str_mv |
Bogotá - Circunvalar |
institution |
Universidad Antonio Nariño |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/bitstreams/d1039ea9-a166-46b1-839a-155e9c7d2ac7/download https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/bitstreams/0a110fe5-f349-43b6-9767-c5f5ab6ac4e6/download https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/bitstreams/39b3e939-a2aa-46a5-bfbe-5c3d8f2870fc/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
9048a8dbecffdbb1e56957eb140be51d d9f6f7426b3ac742d22a6629a12055bf 2e388663398085f69421c9e4c5fcf235 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional UAN |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
alertas.repositorio@uan.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814300360588656640 |
spelling |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)Acceso abiertohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Garzón Parra, JohannaPérez Molina, Daniela Katherinne10239713022021-03-02T22:36:50Z2021-03-02T22:36:50Z2020-12-03http://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/23461. Dumbleton B, Caffery M, Dogru S, Curran H, Kern J, Kojima P, Morgan, Purslow, Robertson D, Nelson J. Members of the TFOS in- ternational workshop on contact lens discomfort, The TFOS international workshop on contact lens discomfort: report of the subcommittee on epidemiology, Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 54 (2013) 20–36. 2. Nichols J, Willcox M, Bron A, Belmonte C, Ciolino J, Craig J, Dogru M, Foulks, Jones L, Nelson J, Nichols K, Purslow C, Schaumberg D, Stapleton F, Sullivan D. Members of the TFOS international workshop on contact lens discomfort, The TFOS international workshop on contact lens discomfort: executive summary, Invest Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 54 (2013) 7–13. 3. Guillon M, Maissa C. Dry eye symptomatology of soft contact lens wearers and nonwearers, Optom. Vis. Sci. 82 (2005) 829–834. 4. Papas E, Tilia D, Tomlinson D, Williams J, Chan E, Chan J, Golebiowski B. Consequences of wear interruption for discomfort with contact lenses, Optom. Vis. Sci. 91 (2014) 24–31. 5. Nichols K, Nichols J, Mitchell G. The lack of association between signs and symptoms in patients with dry eye disease, Cornea 23 (2004) 762–770. 6. Martin D. Water transport in dehydrating hydrogel contact lenses: implications for corneal desiccation, J. Biomed. Mater. Res A. 29 (1995) 857–865. 7. Pult H, Bandlitz S. Lid-parallel conjunctival folds and their ability to predict dry eye, Eye Contact Lens 44 (Suppl 2) (2017) 113–119 8. Xiang H, Zhang X, Zhang Z, Li S, Wang H, Han Z, Zhou H, Jia Y, Chen X. Expressions of matrix metalloproteinases 1 and 3 and their tissue inhibitors in the conjunctival tissue and fibroblasts cultured from conjunctivochalasis. Int J Ophthalmol. 2017;10(4):555 9. (S.N).Revista Imagen óptica. Epiteliopatía del parpado en limpiaparabrisas. 2014.disponible en: https://issuu.com/imagenoptica/docs/revista_91/68 10. Pult H, Riede-Pult BH. Impact of soft contact lenses on lid- parallel conjunctival folds. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2019 Aug 1;42(4):415–9 11. Bandlitz S, Purslow C, Murphy J, Pult H. Lid-parallel conjunctival fold (LIPCOF) morphology imaged by optical coherence tomography and its relationship to LIPCOF grade. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2019 Jun 1;42(3):299–303 12. Zimmerman A. Complicaciones Cl contemporáneas. Contact lens spectrum. Volumen 33; 2018 página (s): 20-25,27 13. Li W, Yeh T, Leung T, Yuen T, Lerma M, Lin MC. The Relationship of Lid Wiper Epitheliopathy to Ocular Surface Signs and Symptoms. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018; 59(5):1878-1887. doi:10.1167/iovs.17-23639 14. Muntz, Lakshman, Subbaraman, Craig, Jones. Cytomorphological assessment of the lid margin in relation to symptoms, contact lens wear and lid wiper epitheliopathy. The Ocular Surface. Volume 18, Issue 2, April 2020, Pages 214-220 15. Deng Z, Wang J, Jiang H, et al. Lid Wiper Microvascular Responses as an Indicator of Contact Lens Discomfort. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016; 170:197-205. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2016.08.009 16. Woods J. Conjunctival Responses to Contact Lens Wear. Contact Lens Spectrum, Volume: 30;2015, page (s): 34-36,38 17. Evans K, Pult H. ¿ Qué importancia tienen las propiedades las lentes de contacto ?. 2014;1–4. Available from: www.jnjvisioncare.es 18. Boyd K. Lentes de contacto. American academy of ophthalmology. 2020. Disponible en : https://www.aao.org/salud-ocular/anteojos-lentes-de-contacto/lentes-de-contacto 19. Craig J, Nelson J, Azar D, Belmonte C, Bron A, Chauhan S. TFOS DEWS II Report Executive Summary. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(4):802–12 20. D.E.W.S. DEWS Definicion y clasificacion e la Enfermedad del ojo seco [Internet]. Vol. 5. 2007. Available from: http://www.tearfilm.org/dewsreport_Spanish/ 21. Knop N, Korb D, Blackie C, Knop E. The lid wiper contains goblet cells and goblet cell crypts for ocular surface lubrication during the blink. Cornea. 2012 Jun;31(6):668–79. 22. Graue E. Oftalmología en la práctica de la medicina general 4ta edicion [Internet]. Uiversidad. Mexico; 2014 [cited 2019 Nov 17]. 360 p. Available from: https://accessmedicina.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?bookid=1498§ionid=99961490#undefined 23. Pellegrini G, Golisano O, Paterna P, Lambiase A, Bonini S, Rama P, et al. Location and clonal analysis of stem cells and their differentiated progeny in the human ocular surface. J Cell Biol. 1999;145(4):769–82. 24. Dartt DA. Regulation of mucin and fluid secretion by conjunctival epithelial cells [Internet]. Vol. 21, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research. 2002 [cited 2019 Nov 17]. p. 555–76. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12433377 25. Argüeso P, Gipson I. Epithelial mucins of the ocular surface: Structure, biosynthesis and function. Vol. 73, Experimental Eye Research. Academic Press. 2001. p. 281–9 26. Levin M, Verkman A. Aquaporin-dependent water permeation at the mouse ocular surface: In vivo microfluorimetric measurements in cornea and conjunctiva. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Dec;45(12):4423–32 27. Boston TF& OSS. TFOS DEWS II REPORT - Informe de fisiopatología - TFOS - Tear Film & Ocular Surface Society [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2019 Nov 16]. Available from: https://www.tfosdewsreport.org/report-informe_de_fisiopatologa/106_36/es/ 28. The Vision Care Institute. Examen con lámpara de hendidura. Prácticas esenciales con lentes contacto [Internet]. 2012; 23–56. Available from: https://www.jnjvisioncare.es/sites/default/files/public/es/documents/educational_moments/1/examen_lampara_hendidura.pdf 29. Barrero J. Lacrimal P. Película lacrimal: bioquímica y fisiología. Rev la Fac Med. 1986;40(2):203–21 30. López J, García I, Martínez J. Estudio de los pliegues lacunares en el diagnóstico de ojo seco. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol [Internet]. 2003 [cited 2019 Nov 16]; 78(1). Available from: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0365-66912003000100006 31. Tapasztó B, Veres A, Kosina-Hagyó K, Somfai G, Németh J. OCT imaging of lid-parallel conjunctival folds in soft contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci. 2011 Oct; 88(10):1206–13. 32. Solorzano A, Alvarez L, Moncaleano J. Epiteliopatía del borde palpebral en limpiaparabrisas. Revista grupo franja. 2018. Available from: https://grupofranja2.com/index.php/oftalmologia/item/2249-epiteliopatia-del-borde-palpebral-en-limpia-parabrisashttps://riuma.uma.es/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10630/12831/TD_GUIJARRO_HERNNDEZ_Luisa.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y 33. Pult H, Riede-Pult BH. Impact of conjunctival folds on central tear meniscus height. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015; 56(3):1459–66. 34. Jones M, Fulford G, Please C, McElwain D, Collins M. Elastohydrodynamics of the eyelid wiper. Bull Math Biol. 2008 Feb;70(2):323–43 35. Pinto F, Garrote J, Vela A, Calonge M, Gonzalez J. Técnicas diagnósticas para el síndrome de ojo seco (I). Ocul Surf. 2011; 465(I):11. 36. Maastricht ERI. CCLRU Grading Scales 37. Manzini J. Declaración De Helsinki: Principios Éticos Para La Investigación Médica Sobre Sujetos Humanos. Acta Bioeth. 2000;6(2):321–34 38. J&J. Como manejar a los pacientes con epiteliopatía en efecto parabrisas (LWE). The visión care institute. Retrieved from: https://www.jnjvisioncare.es/sites/default/files/public/es/documents/educational_moments/LWE/acu158_educational_moments_2_v4_2.pdfThe appearance of conjunctival folds parallel to the eyelid (LIPCOF) and epitheliopathy of the eyelid in effect windshield (LWE) are caused by the friction that occurred during blinking, due to the instability of the tear film that being in presence with another surface as a contact lens will occur more quickly, because it will also depend on the characteristics of the same.La aparición de los pliegues conjuntivales paralelos al parpado (LIPCOF) y epiteliopatía del parpado en efecto parabrisas (LWE) están originados por la fricción ocurrida durante el parpadeo, debido a la inestabilidad de la película lagrimal que al estar en presencia con otra superficie como un lente de contacto se producirá con mayor rapidez, pues también dependerá de las características del mismo.OptómetraPregradoPresencialspaUniversidad Antonio NariñoOptometríaFacultad de OptometríaBogotá - CircunvalarLWE; LIPCOF; LENTES DE CONTACTOLWE; LIPCOF; CONTACT LENSESRelación entre la aparición de los pliegues conjuntivales paralelos al parpado (LIPCOF) y epiteliopatía del parpado en efecto parabrisas (LWE) asociados al uso de LCTrabajo de grado (Pregrado y/o Especialización)http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1fhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85ORIGINAL2020KatherinnePérezMolina.pdf2020KatherinnePérezMolina.pdfTrabajo de gradoapplication/pdf2099855https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/bitstreams/d1039ea9-a166-46b1-839a-155e9c7d2ac7/download9048a8dbecffdbb1e56957eb140be51dMD512020AutorizacióndeAutores.pdf2020AutorizacióndeAutores.pdfAutorización de autorapplication/pdf1183953https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/bitstreams/0a110fe5-f349-43b6-9767-c5f5ab6ac4e6/downloadd9f6f7426b3ac742d22a6629a12055bfMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82710https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/bitstreams/39b3e939-a2aa-46a5-bfbe-5c3d8f2870fc/download2e388663398085f69421c9e4c5fcf235MD53123456789/2346oai:repositorio.uan.edu.co:123456789/23462024-10-09 22:55:49.118https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Acceso abiertoopen.accesshttps://repositorio.uan.edu.coRepositorio Institucional UANalertas.repositorio@uan.edu.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 |