Revisión literaria – ventajas y desventajas de los sistemas “outdoor” sobre el bienestar de cerdas en gestación y lactancia.

The main objective was to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the “outdoor” type systems on the welfare of pregnant and lactating sows, in order to be able to make a comparison between the different types of pig production that exist, based on three main parameters, stereotypies, piglet mor...

Full description

Autores:: Angel Gonzalez, Jenny Paola

Tipo de recurso:: Trabajo de grado de pregrado

Fecha de publicación:: 2020

Institución:: Universidad Antonio Nariño

Repositorio:: Repositorio UAN

Idioma:: spa

id	UAntonioN2_a253e22bc5c9ab0bd887d6b8809413d9
oai_identifier_str	oai:repositorio.uan.edu.co:123456789/2693
network_acronym_str	UAntonioN2
network_name_str	Repositorio UAN
repository_id_str
dc.title.es_ES.fl_str_mv	Revisión literaria – ventajas y desventajas de los sistemas “outdoor” sobre el bienestar de cerdas en gestación y lactancia.
title	Revisión literaria – ventajas y desventajas de los sistemas “outdoor” sobre el bienestar de cerdas en gestación y lactancia.
spellingShingle	Revisión literaria – ventajas y desventajas de los sistemas “outdoor” sobre el bienestar de cerdas en gestación y lactancia. Bienestar animal sistemas de producción porcina sistemas intensivos de producción de cerdos sistemas orgánicos de producción de cerdos bienestar en cerdas gestantes bienestar en cerdas en etapa de lactancia protocolos de sistemas orgánicos en cerdos sistemas tipo outdoor mortalidad de lechones parasitismo en producciones porcinas estereotipias en cerdos enriquecimiento medioambiental en cerdos Animal welfare pig production systems intensive pig production systems organic pig production systems welfare in pregnant sows welfare in lactating sows protocols for organic systems in pigs outdoor type systems piglet mortality parasitism in pig productions stereotypies in pigs environmental enrichment in pigs
title_short	Revisión literaria – ventajas y desventajas de los sistemas “outdoor” sobre el bienestar de cerdas en gestación y lactancia.
title_full	Revisión literaria – ventajas y desventajas de los sistemas “outdoor” sobre el bienestar de cerdas en gestación y lactancia.
title_fullStr	Revisión literaria – ventajas y desventajas de los sistemas “outdoor” sobre el bienestar de cerdas en gestación y lactancia.
title_full_unstemmed	Revisión literaria – ventajas y desventajas de los sistemas “outdoor” sobre el bienestar de cerdas en gestación y lactancia.
title_sort	Revisión literaria – ventajas y desventajas de los sistemas “outdoor” sobre el bienestar de cerdas en gestación y lactancia.
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Angel Gonzalez, Jenny Paola
dc.contributor.advisor.spa.fl_str_mv	Cruz Uribe, Jaime Fabian
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv	Angel Gonzalez, Jenny Paola
dc.subject.es_ES.fl_str_mv	Bienestar animal sistemas de producción porcina sistemas intensivos de producción de cerdos sistemas orgánicos de producción de cerdos bienestar en cerdas gestantes bienestar en cerdas en etapa de lactancia protocolos de sistemas orgánicos en cerdos sistemas tipo outdoor mortalidad de lechones parasitismo en producciones porcinas estereotipias en cerdos enriquecimiento medioambiental en cerdos
topic	Bienestar animal sistemas de producción porcina sistemas intensivos de producción de cerdos sistemas orgánicos de producción de cerdos bienestar en cerdas gestantes bienestar en cerdas en etapa de lactancia protocolos de sistemas orgánicos en cerdos sistemas tipo outdoor mortalidad de lechones parasitismo en producciones porcinas estereotipias en cerdos enriquecimiento medioambiental en cerdos Animal welfare pig production systems intensive pig production systems organic pig production systems welfare in pregnant sows welfare in lactating sows protocols for organic systems in pigs outdoor type systems piglet mortality parasitism in pig productions stereotypies in pigs environmental enrichment in pigs
dc.subject.keyword.es_ES.fl_str_mv	Animal welfare pig production systems intensive pig production systems organic pig production systems welfare in pregnant sows welfare in lactating sows protocols for organic systems in pigs outdoor type systems piglet mortality parasitism in pig productions stereotypies in pigs environmental enrichment in pigs
description	The main objective was to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the “outdoor” type systems on the welfare of pregnant and lactating sows, in order to be able to make a comparison between the different types of pig production that exist, based on three main parameters, stereotypies, piglet mortality and parasitic diseases, likewise to analyze these types of systems in relation to animal welfare, based on the principles of the 5 freedoms.
publishDate	2020
dc.date.issued.spa.fl_str_mv	2020-07-10
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2021-03-05T15:50:59Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2021-03-05T15:50:59Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Trabajo de grado (Pregrado y/o Especialización)
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.coarversion.none.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	http://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/2693
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation.spa.fl_str_mv	Antunovi , B., Vargovi , L., Cvrkovi , D., Kundih, K., Spaji , R., Sili, V. , Ostovi , M. (2012). Poljoprivreda. Biosigurnosne Mjere u intenzivnome svinjogojstvu, 18(1), 60-64. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/ Baxter, E. M., Andersen, I. L., & Edwards, S. A. (2018). Sow welfare in the farrowing crate and alternatives. Advances in Pig Welfare, 27-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-101012-9.00002-2 Budiño, F. E. L., Vieira, R. F. N., Mello, S. P., & Duarte, K. M. R. (2014). Behavior and performance of sows fed different levels of fiber and reared in individual cages or collective pens. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 86(4), 2109-2020. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201420140301 Bunge Mennerich, V. B. (2003). Züchtungskunde . Intensive Schweinehaltung – Chance oder Risiko?, 75(6), 452-458. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net Caldara, F. R., Rosa, P. S. G., Ferreira, R. A., Reis, N. M. de O., Nääs, I. de A., Paz, I. C., Ferreira, V. M. (2012). Behavior, performance and physiological parameters of pigs reared in deep bedding. Engenharia Agrícola, 32(1), 38-46. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-69162012000100005 Campiño, G. P., Espinosa, A., & Ocampo, D. (2010, 1 octubre). Comportamiento de Cerdos de Engorde en un Sistema de Cama Profunda Utilizando Racimos Vacíos de Palma de Aceite Elaeis guineensis Jacq. ORINOQUIA, 14(2), 147-159. Recuperado de ScienceDirect Charlotte, G. E., Henricia, G., Büttnera, K., Meyerb, C., & Krieter, J. (2016, 11 abril). Does housing influence maternal behaviour in sows? Elsevier, 1(180), 26-34. Recuperado de ScienceDirect Choi, Y., Min, Y., Kim, Y., Jeong, Y., Kim, D., Kim, J., & Jung, H. (2020). Effects of loose farrowing facilities on reproductive performance in primiparous sows. Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 62(2), 218-226. https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2020.62.2.218 Código Terrestre: OIE - World Organisation for Animal Health. (2019). Recuperado 5 de mayo de 2020, de https://www.oie.int/es/normas/codigo-terrestre Criterios de bienestar animal - Certificado Welfair. (2019, 15 octubre). Recuperado 20 de junio de 2020, de https://www.animalwelfair.com/certificado-welfair/criterios/ Edwards, S., & Leeb, C. (2018). Organic pig production systems, welfare and sustainability. Achieving sustainable production of pig meat , 1, 249-270. https://doi.org/10.19103/as.2017.0030.13 Fernandes, H. C., Moreira, R. F., Longui, F. C., Rinaldi, P. C., & Siqueira, W. (2011). Efeito do aquecimento e resfriamento de pisos no desempenho de matrizes e leitões. Rev. Ceres Viçosa, 58(6), 701-709. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-737X2011000600004 Gade, P. B. (2002). Welfare of animal production in intensive and organic systems with special reference to Danish organic pig production. Meat Science, 62(3), 353-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0309-1740(02)00123-7 Godyń, D., Nowicki, J., & Herbut, P. (2019). Effects of Environmental Enrichment on Pig Welfare—A Review. Animals, 9(6), 383. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9060383 Gourdine, J. L., De Greef, K. H., & Rydhmer, L. (2010, 19 abril). Breeding for welfare in outdoor pig production: A simulation study. Livestock Science, (132) pag, 26-34. Recuperado de ScienceDirect. Grunert, K. G., Sonntag, W. I., Glanz-Chanos, V., & Forum, S. (2018). Consumer interest in environmental impact, safety, health and animal welfare aspects of modern pig production: Results of a cross-national choice experiment. Meat Science, 137, 123-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.11.022 Horback, K. M., Pierdon, M. K., & Parsons, T. D. (2016). Behavioral preference for different enrichment objects in acommercial sow herd. Elsevier , 184, 7-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2016.09.002 Hötzel, M. J., Machado Filho, L. C., & Dalla Costa, O. A. (2005). Behaviour of pre-parturient sows housed in intensive outdoor or indoor systems. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 40(2), 169-174. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-204x2005000200010 Huerta, R., & Gasa , J. (2012). Instalaciones para porcinos (Red Porcina Iberoamericana P, 1-13). Recuperado de http://www.produccion-animal.com.ar Izquierdo, A. C., Ruiz, C. G., Campos, V. X., Mendoza, M. M., Huerta, R., Mancera, A. V., … Guerra , E. (2016). El bienestar animal en la producción porcina. II (BM Editores). Recuperado de https://www.produccion-animal.com.ar Kijlstra, A., & Eijck, I. A. J. M. (2006). Animal health in organic livestock production systems: a review. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 54(1), 77-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1573-5214(06)80005-9 KilBride, A. L., Mendl, M., Statham, P., Held, S., Harris, M., Marchant-Forde, J. N., … Green, L. E. (2014). Risks associated with preweaning mortality in 855 litters on 39 commercial outdoor pig farms in England. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 117(1), 189-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.08.004 Knecht, D., & Jankowska Mąkosa, A. (2020). Endoparasites in Sows and Selected Reproduction Parameters. Acta Veterinaria, 70(1), 71-80. https://doi.org/10.2478/acve-2020-0005 Kobek Thorsen, C., Aagaard Schild, S. L., Rangstrup, L., Bilde, C., & Pedersen, L. J. (2017). The effect of farrowing duration on maternal behavior of hyperprolific sows in organic outdoor production. Livestock Science, 204, 92-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.08.015 Lange, A., Gentz, M., Hahne, M., Lambertz, C., Gauly, M., Burfeind, O., & Traulsen, I. (2020). Effects of Different Farrowing and Rearing Systems on Post-Weaning Stress in Piglets. Agriculture, 10(6), 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10060230 Lawrence, A. B., & Terlouw, E. M. C. (2013). A review of behavioral factors involved in the development and continued performance of stereotypic behaviors in pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 71(10), 2815-2825. https://doi.org/10.2527/1993.71102815x Lindgren, K., Gunnarsson, S., Höglund, J. et al. Nematode parasite eggs in pasture soils and pigs on organic farms in Sweden. Org. Agr. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-019-00273-3 Lühken, E., Nicolaisen, T., Risch, B., Volkmann, N., Schnier, S., Schulz, J., & Kemper, N. (2019). Comparison of Two Free-Farrowing Systems and a Conventional Farrowing Crate System with Special Regard to Air Hygiene. Agriculture, 9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9010012 Luković, Z., Škorput, D., & Karolyi, D. (2017). Pig welfare at different production systems. Researchgate, 170-175. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net Maganga, G. D., Kombila, L. B., Boundenga, L., Kinga, I. C. M., Obame-Nkoghe, J., Tchoffo, H., … Awah-Ndukum, J. (2019). Diversity and prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in farmed pigs in Southeast Gabon, Central Africa. Veterinary World, 12(12), 1888-1896. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2019.1888-1896 Manteca , X. (2012). Bienestar animal (Red Porcina Iberoamericana. p. 97-111). Recuperado de http://www.produccion-animal.com.ar Mellor, D. (2017). Operational Details of the Five Domains Model and Its Key Applications to the Assessment and Management of Animal Welfare. Animals, 7(12), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7080060 Mesarec, N., Povše, M. P., Škorjanc, D., & Skok, J. (2017). Gangs of piglets: Welfare and growth of imprinted and guided weaners. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 195, 44-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.05.018 Nazareno, A. C., da Silva, I. J. O., Nunes, M. L., de Castro, A. C., Miranda, K. O., & Trabachini, A. (2012). Caracterização bioclimática de sistemas ao ar livre e confinado para a criação de matrizes suínas gestantes. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, 16(3), 314-319. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1415-43662012000300013 Nevrkla, P., & Hadaš, Z. (2015). Effect of Housing of Lactating Sows on Their Reproductive Performance and Losses of Piglets From Birth to Weaning. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63(1), 95-100. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201563010095 Oliveira da Silva, I. J., Pandorfi, H., & De Stefano Piedade, S. M. (2007, 5 diciembre). Influência do sistema de alojamento no comportamento e bem-estar de matrizes suínas em gestação. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 37(7), 1319-1329. Recuperado de www.sbz.org.br Oliveira, R. F., Soares, R. T. R. N., Molino, J. P., Costa, R. L., Bonaparte, T. P., Silva Júnior, E. T., … Santos, I. P. (2016). Environmental enrichment improves the performance and behavior of piglets in the nursery phase. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 68(2), 415-421. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-8253 Park, H. S., Min, B., & Oh, S. H. (2017). Research trends in outdoor pig production — A review. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 30(9), 1207-1214. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0330 Principles of Organic Agriculture. (2020, 6 marzo). Recuperado 17 de junio de 2020, de https://www.ifoam.bio/principles-organic-agriculture-brochure Ruff, G. R., Pairis-Garcia, M. D., Campler, M. R., Moeller, S. J., & Johnson, A. K. (2017). Effect of rubber mats on sow behavior and litter performance during lactation. Livestock Science, 204, 65-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.08.010 Schrey, L., Kemper, N., & Fels, M. (2017). Behaviour and skin injuries of sows kept in a novel group housing system during lactation. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 46(1), 749-757. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2017.1394308 Scipioni, R., Martelli, G., & Antonella Volpelli, L. (2009). Assessment of welfare in pigs. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 8(sup1), 117-137. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2009.s1.117 Špinka, M., Illmann, G. , Chaloupková, H., Náměstková, P., & Neuhauserová, K. (2009). Pig vocalizations as a measure of hunger lfare Quality, 3-13. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net Tatemoto, P., Bernardino, T., Morrone, B., Queiroz, M., & Zanella, A. J. (2020). Stereotypic Behavior in Sows Is Related to Emotionality Changes in the Offspring. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7, 79. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00079 Tavares de Oliveira , N., Carvalho, P. L., Genova, J. L., Rodrigues Silveira, F. H., Ogawa, L., Cristofori, E. C., … Almeida Santana, A. L. (2019). Effect of endoparasites occurrence in sows from intensive production system. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária, 28(4), 722-727. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1984-29612019091 Van de Weerd, H. A., & Day, J. E. L. (2009). A review of environmental enrichment for pigs housed in intensive housing systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 116(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.08.001
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv	instname:Universidad Antonio Nariño
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv	reponame:Repositorio Institucional UAN
dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv	repourl:https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/
url	http://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/2693
identifier_str_mv	Antunovi , B., Vargovi , L., Cvrkovi , D., Kundih, K., Spaji , R., Sili, V. , Ostovi , M. (2012). Poljoprivreda. Biosigurnosne Mjere u intenzivnome svinjogojstvu, 18(1), 60-64. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/ Baxter, E. M., Andersen, I. L., & Edwards, S. A. (2018). Sow welfare in the farrowing crate and alternatives. Advances in Pig Welfare, 27-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-101012-9.00002-2 Budiño, F. E. L., Vieira, R. F. N., Mello, S. P., & Duarte, K. M. R. (2014). Behavior and performance of sows fed different levels of fiber and reared in individual cages or collective pens. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 86(4), 2109-2020. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201420140301 Bunge Mennerich, V. B. (2003). Züchtungskunde . Intensive Schweinehaltung – Chance oder Risiko?, 75(6), 452-458. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net Caldara, F. R., Rosa, P. S. G., Ferreira, R. A., Reis, N. M. de O., Nääs, I. de A., Paz, I. C., Ferreira, V. M. (2012). Behavior, performance and physiological parameters of pigs reared in deep bedding. Engenharia Agrícola, 32(1), 38-46. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-69162012000100005 Campiño, G. P., Espinosa, A., & Ocampo, D. (2010, 1 octubre). Comportamiento de Cerdos de Engorde en un Sistema de Cama Profunda Utilizando Racimos Vacíos de Palma de Aceite Elaeis guineensis Jacq. ORINOQUIA, 14(2), 147-159. Recuperado de ScienceDirect Charlotte, G. E., Henricia, G., Büttnera, K., Meyerb, C., & Krieter, J. (2016, 11 abril). Does housing influence maternal behaviour in sows? Elsevier, 1(180), 26-34. Recuperado de ScienceDirect Choi, Y., Min, Y., Kim, Y., Jeong, Y., Kim, D., Kim, J., & Jung, H. (2020). Effects of loose farrowing facilities on reproductive performance in primiparous sows. Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 62(2), 218-226. https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2020.62.2.218 Código Terrestre: OIE - World Organisation for Animal Health. (2019). Recuperado 5 de mayo de 2020, de https://www.oie.int/es/normas/codigo-terrestre Criterios de bienestar animal - Certificado Welfair. (2019, 15 octubre). Recuperado 20 de junio de 2020, de https://www.animalwelfair.com/certificado-welfair/criterios/ Edwards, S., & Leeb, C. (2018). Organic pig production systems, welfare and sustainability. Achieving sustainable production of pig meat , 1, 249-270. https://doi.org/10.19103/as.2017.0030.13 Fernandes, H. C., Moreira, R. F., Longui, F. C., Rinaldi, P. C., & Siqueira, W. (2011). Efeito do aquecimento e resfriamento de pisos no desempenho de matrizes e leitões. Rev. Ceres Viçosa, 58(6), 701-709. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-737X2011000600004 Gade, P. B. (2002). Welfare of animal production in intensive and organic systems with special reference to Danish organic pig production. Meat Science, 62(3), 353-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0309-1740(02)00123-7 Godyń, D., Nowicki, J., & Herbut, P. (2019). Effects of Environmental Enrichment on Pig Welfare—A Review. Animals, 9(6), 383. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9060383 Gourdine, J. L., De Greef, K. H., & Rydhmer, L. (2010, 19 abril). Breeding for welfare in outdoor pig production: A simulation study. Livestock Science, (132) pag, 26-34. Recuperado de ScienceDirect. Grunert, K. G., Sonntag, W. I., Glanz-Chanos, V., & Forum, S. (2018). Consumer interest in environmental impact, safety, health and animal welfare aspects of modern pig production: Results of a cross-national choice experiment. Meat Science, 137, 123-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.11.022 Horback, K. M., Pierdon, M. K., & Parsons, T. D. (2016). Behavioral preference for different enrichment objects in acommercial sow herd. Elsevier , 184, 7-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2016.09.002 Hötzel, M. J., Machado Filho, L. C., & Dalla Costa, O. A. (2005). Behaviour of pre-parturient sows housed in intensive outdoor or indoor systems. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 40(2), 169-174. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-204x2005000200010 Huerta, R., & Gasa , J. (2012). Instalaciones para porcinos (Red Porcina Iberoamericana P, 1-13). Recuperado de http://www.produccion-animal.com.ar Izquierdo, A. C., Ruiz, C. G., Campos, V. X., Mendoza, M. M., Huerta, R., Mancera, A. V., … Guerra , E. (2016). El bienestar animal en la producción porcina. II (BM Editores). Recuperado de https://www.produccion-animal.com.ar Kijlstra, A., & Eijck, I. A. J. M. (2006). Animal health in organic livestock production systems: a review. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 54(1), 77-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1573-5214(06)80005-9 KilBride, A. L., Mendl, M., Statham, P., Held, S., Harris, M., Marchant-Forde, J. N., … Green, L. E. (2014). Risks associated with preweaning mortality in 855 litters on 39 commercial outdoor pig farms in England. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 117(1), 189-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.08.004 Knecht, D., & Jankowska Mąkosa, A. (2020). Endoparasites in Sows and Selected Reproduction Parameters. Acta Veterinaria, 70(1), 71-80. https://doi.org/10.2478/acve-2020-0005 Kobek Thorsen, C., Aagaard Schild, S. L., Rangstrup, L., Bilde, C., & Pedersen, L. J. (2017). The effect of farrowing duration on maternal behavior of hyperprolific sows in organic outdoor production. Livestock Science, 204, 92-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.08.015 Lange, A., Gentz, M., Hahne, M., Lambertz, C., Gauly, M., Burfeind, O., & Traulsen, I. (2020). Effects of Different Farrowing and Rearing Systems on Post-Weaning Stress in Piglets. Agriculture, 10(6), 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10060230 Lawrence, A. B., & Terlouw, E. M. C. (2013). A review of behavioral factors involved in the development and continued performance of stereotypic behaviors in pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 71(10), 2815-2825. https://doi.org/10.2527/1993.71102815x Lindgren, K., Gunnarsson, S., Höglund, J. et al. Nematode parasite eggs in pasture soils and pigs on organic farms in Sweden. Org. Agr. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-019-00273-3 Lühken, E., Nicolaisen, T., Risch, B., Volkmann, N., Schnier, S., Schulz, J., & Kemper, N. (2019). Comparison of Two Free-Farrowing Systems and a Conventional Farrowing Crate System with Special Regard to Air Hygiene. Agriculture, 9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9010012 Luković, Z., Škorput, D., & Karolyi, D. (2017). Pig welfare at different production systems. Researchgate, 170-175. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net Maganga, G. D., Kombila, L. B., Boundenga, L., Kinga, I. C. M., Obame-Nkoghe, J., Tchoffo, H., … Awah-Ndukum, J. (2019). Diversity and prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in farmed pigs in Southeast Gabon, Central Africa. Veterinary World, 12(12), 1888-1896. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2019.1888-1896 Manteca , X. (2012). Bienestar animal (Red Porcina Iberoamericana. p. 97-111). Recuperado de http://www.produccion-animal.com.ar Mellor, D. (2017). Operational Details of the Five Domains Model and Its Key Applications to the Assessment and Management of Animal Welfare. Animals, 7(12), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7080060 Mesarec, N., Povše, M. P., Škorjanc, D., & Skok, J. (2017). Gangs of piglets: Welfare and growth of imprinted and guided weaners. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 195, 44-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.05.018 Nazareno, A. C., da Silva, I. J. O., Nunes, M. L., de Castro, A. C., Miranda, K. O., & Trabachini, A. (2012). Caracterização bioclimática de sistemas ao ar livre e confinado para a criação de matrizes suínas gestantes. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, 16(3), 314-319. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1415-43662012000300013 Nevrkla, P., & Hadaš, Z. (2015). Effect of Housing of Lactating Sows on Their Reproductive Performance and Losses of Piglets From Birth to Weaning. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63(1), 95-100. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201563010095 Oliveira da Silva, I. J., Pandorfi, H., & De Stefano Piedade, S. M. (2007, 5 diciembre). Influência do sistema de alojamento no comportamento e bem-estar de matrizes suínas em gestação. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 37(7), 1319-1329. Recuperado de www.sbz.org.br Oliveira, R. F., Soares, R. T. R. N., Molino, J. P., Costa, R. L., Bonaparte, T. P., Silva Júnior, E. T., … Santos, I. P. (2016). Environmental enrichment improves the performance and behavior of piglets in the nursery phase. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 68(2), 415-421. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-8253 Park, H. S., Min, B., & Oh, S. H. (2017). Research trends in outdoor pig production — A review. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 30(9), 1207-1214. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0330 Principles of Organic Agriculture. (2020, 6 marzo). Recuperado 17 de junio de 2020, de https://www.ifoam.bio/principles-organic-agriculture-brochure Ruff, G. R., Pairis-Garcia, M. D., Campler, M. R., Moeller, S. J., & Johnson, A. K. (2017). Effect of rubber mats on sow behavior and litter performance during lactation. Livestock Science, 204, 65-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.08.010 Schrey, L., Kemper, N., & Fels, M. (2017). Behaviour and skin injuries of sows kept in a novel group housing system during lactation. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 46(1), 749-757. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2017.1394308 Scipioni, R., Martelli, G., & Antonella Volpelli, L. (2009). Assessment of welfare in pigs. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 8(sup1), 117-137. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2009.s1.117 Špinka, M., Illmann, G. , Chaloupková, H., Náměstková, P., & Neuhauserová, K. (2009). Pig vocalizations as a measure of hunger lfare Quality, 3-13. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net Tatemoto, P., Bernardino, T., Morrone, B., Queiroz, M., & Zanella, A. J. (2020). Stereotypic Behavior in Sows Is Related to Emotionality Changes in the Offspring. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7, 79. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00079 Tavares de Oliveira , N., Carvalho, P. L., Genova, J. L., Rodrigues Silveira, F. H., Ogawa, L., Cristofori, E. C., … Almeida Santana, A. L. (2019). Effect of endoparasites occurrence in sows from intensive production system. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária, 28(4), 722-727. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1984-29612019091 Van de Weerd, H. A., & Day, J. E. L. (2009). A review of environmental enrichment for pigs housed in intensive housing systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 116(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.08.001 instname:Universidad Antonio Nariño reponame:Repositorio Institucional UAN repourl:https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv	Acceso a solo metadatos
dc.rights.license.spa.fl_str_mv	Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb
rights_invalid_str_mv	Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Acceso a solo metadatos https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb
eu_rights_str_mv	closedAccess
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad Antonio Nariño
dc.publisher.program.spa.fl_str_mv	Medicina Veterinaria
dc.publisher.faculty.spa.fl_str_mv	Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria
dc.publisher.campus.spa.fl_str_mv	Bogotá - Circunvalar
institution	Universidad Antonio Nariño
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/bitstreams/04d6f5c9-de68-42da-a106-3bd2f5c00f1f/download https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/bitstreams/75386da8-c088-4db0-ac50-6569ccccd284/download https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/bitstreams/148e6feb-7c12-406e-83a1-6c5b98763247/download https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/bitstreams/1966f6ea-03f2-481c-bab1-b36f6d246c63/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	fd78f8e5e568cb10ae3636138f97e6db 2b5e71bbe16328abdb57646752643054 2b2ab6ec8a6a222739b9c0e57c635c2e 2e388663398085f69421c9e4c5fcf235
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional UAN
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	alertas.repositorio@uan.edu.co
_version_	1812928294799015936
spelling	Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)Acceso a solo metadatoshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cbCruz Uribe, Jaime FabianAngel Gonzalez, Jenny Paola2021-03-05T15:50:59Z2021-03-05T15:50:59Z2020-07-10http://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/2693Antunovi , B., Vargovi , L., Cvrkovi , D., Kundih, K., Spaji , R., Sili, V. , Ostovi , M. (2012). Poljoprivreda. Biosigurnosne Mjere u intenzivnome svinjogojstvu, 18(1), 60-64. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/Baxter, E. M., Andersen, I. L., & Edwards, S. A. (2018). Sow welfare in the farrowing crate and alternatives. Advances in Pig Welfare, 27-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-101012-9.00002-2Budiño, F. E. L., Vieira, R. F. N., Mello, S. P., & Duarte, K. M. R. (2014). Behavior and performance of sows fed different levels of fiber and reared in individual cages or collective pens. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 86(4), 2109-2020. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201420140301Bunge Mennerich, V. B. (2003). Züchtungskunde . Intensive Schweinehaltung – Chance oder Risiko?, 75(6), 452-458. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.netCaldara, F. R., Rosa, P. S. G., Ferreira, R. A., Reis, N. M. de O., Nääs, I. de A., Paz, I. C., Ferreira, V. M. (2012). Behavior, performance and physiological parameters of pigs reared in deep bedding. Engenharia Agrícola, 32(1), 38-46. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-69162012000100005Campiño, G. P., Espinosa, A., & Ocampo, D. (2010, 1 octubre). Comportamiento de Cerdos de Engorde en un Sistema de Cama Profunda Utilizando Racimos Vacíos de Palma de Aceite Elaeis guineensis Jacq. ORINOQUIA, 14(2), 147-159. Recuperado de ScienceDirectCharlotte, G. E., Henricia, G., Büttnera, K., Meyerb, C., & Krieter, J. (2016, 11 abril). Does housing influence maternal behaviour in sows? Elsevier, 1(180), 26-34. Recuperado de ScienceDirectChoi, Y., Min, Y., Kim, Y., Jeong, Y., Kim, D., Kim, J., & Jung, H. (2020). Effects of loose farrowing facilities on reproductive performance in primiparous sows. Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 62(2), 218-226. https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2020.62.2.218Código Terrestre: OIE - World Organisation for Animal Health. (2019). Recuperado 5 de mayo de 2020, de https://www.oie.int/es/normas/codigo-terrestreCriterios de bienestar animal - Certificado Welfair. (2019, 15 octubre). Recuperado 20 de junio de 2020, de https://www.animalwelfair.com/certificado-welfair/criterios/Edwards, S., & Leeb, C. (2018). Organic pig production systems, welfare and sustainability. Achieving sustainable production of pig meat , 1, 249-270. https://doi.org/10.19103/as.2017.0030.13Fernandes, H. C., Moreira, R. F., Longui, F. C., Rinaldi, P. C., & Siqueira, W. (2011). Efeito do aquecimento e resfriamento de pisos no desempenho de matrizes e leitões. Rev. Ceres Viçosa, 58(6), 701-709. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-737X2011000600004Gade, P. B. (2002). Welfare of animal production in intensive and organic systems with special reference to Danish organic pig production. Meat Science, 62(3), 353-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0309-1740(02)00123-7Godyń, D., Nowicki, J., & Herbut, P. (2019). Effects of Environmental Enrichment on Pig Welfare—A Review. Animals, 9(6), 383. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9060383Gourdine, J. L., De Greef, K. H., & Rydhmer, L. (2010, 19 abril). Breeding for welfare in outdoor pig production: A simulation study. Livestock Science, (132) pag, 26-34. Recuperado de ScienceDirect.Grunert, K. G., Sonntag, W. I., Glanz-Chanos, V., & Forum, S. (2018). Consumer interest in environmental impact, safety, health and animal welfare aspects of modern pig production: Results of a cross-national choice experiment. Meat Science, 137, 123-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.11.022Horback, K. M., Pierdon, M. K., & Parsons, T. D. (2016). Behavioral preference for different enrichment objects in acommercial sow herd. Elsevier , 184, 7-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2016.09.002Hötzel, M. J., Machado Filho, L. C., & Dalla Costa, O. A. (2005). Behaviour of pre-parturient sows housed in intensive outdoor or indoor systems. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 40(2), 169-174. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-204x2005000200010Huerta, R., & Gasa , J. (2012). Instalaciones para porcinos (Red Porcina Iberoamericana P, 1-13). Recuperado de http://www.produccion-animal.com.arIzquierdo, A. C., Ruiz, C. G., Campos, V. X., Mendoza, M. M., Huerta, R., Mancera, A. V., … Guerra , E. (2016). El bienestar animal en la producción porcina. II (BM Editores). Recuperado de https://www.produccion-animal.com.arKijlstra, A., & Eijck, I. A. J. M. (2006). Animal health in organic livestock production systems: a review. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 54(1), 77-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1573-5214(06)80005-9KilBride, A. L., Mendl, M., Statham, P., Held, S., Harris, M., Marchant-Forde, J. N., … Green, L. E. (2014). Risks associated with preweaning mortality in 855 litters on 39 commercial outdoor pig farms in England. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 117(1), 189-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.08.004Knecht, D., & Jankowska Mąkosa, A. (2020). Endoparasites in Sows and Selected Reproduction Parameters. Acta Veterinaria, 70(1), 71-80. https://doi.org/10.2478/acve-2020-0005Kobek Thorsen, C., Aagaard Schild, S. L., Rangstrup, L., Bilde, C., & Pedersen, L. J. (2017). The effect of farrowing duration on maternal behavior of hyperprolific sows in organic outdoor production. Livestock Science, 204, 92-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.08.015Lange, A., Gentz, M., Hahne, M., Lambertz, C., Gauly, M., Burfeind, O., & Traulsen, I. (2020). Effects of Different Farrowing and Rearing Systems on Post-Weaning Stress in Piglets. Agriculture, 10(6), 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10060230Lawrence, A. B., & Terlouw, E. M. C. (2013). A review of behavioral factors involved in the development and continued performance of stereotypic behaviors in pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 71(10), 2815-2825. https://doi.org/10.2527/1993.71102815xLindgren, K., Gunnarsson, S., Höglund, J. et al. Nematode parasite eggs in pasture soils and pigs on organic farms in Sweden. Org. Agr. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-019-00273-3Lühken, E., Nicolaisen, T., Risch, B., Volkmann, N., Schnier, S., Schulz, J., & Kemper, N. (2019). Comparison of Two Free-Farrowing Systems and a Conventional Farrowing Crate System with Special Regard to Air Hygiene. Agriculture, 9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9010012Luković, Z., Škorput, D., & Karolyi, D. (2017). Pig welfare at different production systems. Researchgate, 170-175. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.netMaganga, G. D., Kombila, L. B., Boundenga, L., Kinga, I. C. M., Obame-Nkoghe, J., Tchoffo, H., … Awah-Ndukum, J. (2019). Diversity and prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in farmed pigs in Southeast Gabon, Central Africa. Veterinary World, 12(12), 1888-1896. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2019.1888-1896Manteca , X. (2012). Bienestar animal (Red Porcina Iberoamericana. p. 97-111). Recuperado de http://www.produccion-animal.com.arMellor, D. (2017). Operational Details of the Five Domains Model and Its Key Applications to the Assessment and Management of Animal Welfare. Animals, 7(12), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7080060Mesarec, N., Povše, M. P., Škorjanc, D., & Skok, J. (2017). Gangs of piglets: Welfare and growth of imprinted and guided weaners. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 195, 44-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.05.018Nazareno, A. C., da Silva, I. J. O., Nunes, M. L., de Castro, A. C., Miranda, K. O., & Trabachini, A. (2012). Caracterização bioclimática de sistemas ao ar livre e confinado para a criação de matrizes suínas gestantes. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, 16(3), 314-319. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1415-43662012000300013Nevrkla, P., & Hadaš, Z. (2015). Effect of Housing of Lactating Sows on Their Reproductive Performance and Losses of Piglets From Birth to Weaning. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63(1), 95-100. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201563010095Oliveira da Silva, I. J., Pandorfi, H., & De Stefano Piedade, S. M. (2007, 5 diciembre). Influência do sistema de alojamento no comportamento e bem-estar de matrizes suínas em gestação. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 37(7), 1319-1329. Recuperado de www.sbz.org.brOliveira, R. F., Soares, R. T. R. N., Molino, J. P., Costa, R. L., Bonaparte, T. P., Silva Júnior, E. T., … Santos, I. P. (2016). Environmental enrichment improves the performance and behavior of piglets in the nursery phase. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 68(2), 415-421. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-8253Park, H. S., Min, B., & Oh, S. H. (2017). Research trends in outdoor pig production — A review. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 30(9), 1207-1214. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0330 Principles of Organic Agriculture. (2020, 6 marzo). Recuperado 17 de junio de 2020, de https://www.ifoam.bio/principles-organic-agriculture-brochureRuff, G. R., Pairis-Garcia, M. D., Campler, M. R., Moeller, S. J., & Johnson, A. K. (2017). Effect of rubber mats on sow behavior and litter performance during lactation. Livestock Science, 204, 65-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.08.010Schrey, L., Kemper, N., & Fels, M. (2017). Behaviour and skin injuries of sows kept in a novel group housing system during lactation. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 46(1), 749-757. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2017.1394308Scipioni, R., Martelli, G., & Antonella Volpelli, L. (2009). Assessment of welfare in pigs. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 8(sup1), 117-137. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2009.s1.117Špinka, M., Illmann, G. , Chaloupková, H., Náměstková, P., & Neuhauserová, K. (2009). Pig vocalizations as a measure of hunger lfare Quality, 3-13. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.netTatemoto, P., Bernardino, T., Morrone, B., Queiroz, M., & Zanella, A. J. (2020). Stereotypic Behavior in Sows Is Related to Emotionality Changes in the Offspring. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7, 79. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00079Tavares de Oliveira , N., Carvalho, P. L., Genova, J. L., Rodrigues Silveira, F. H., Ogawa, L., Cristofori, E. C., … Almeida Santana, A. L. (2019). Effect of endoparasites occurrence in sows from intensive production system. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária, 28(4), 722-727. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1984-29612019091Van de Weerd, H. A., & Day, J. E. L. (2009). A review of environmental enrichment for pigs housed in intensive housing systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 116(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.08.001instname:Universidad Antonio Nariñoreponame:Repositorio Institucional UANrepourl:https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/The main objective was to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the “outdoor” type systems on the welfare of pregnant and lactating sows, in order to be able to make a comparison between the different types of pig production that exist, based on three main parameters, stereotypies, piglet mortality and parasitic diseases, likewise to analyze these types of systems in relation to animal welfare, based on the principles of the 5 freedoms.El objetivo principal fue evaluar las ventajas y desventajas de los sistemas tipo “outdoor” sobre el bienestar de cerdas en gestación y lactancia, para así poder hacer una comparación entre los diferentes tipos de producción porcina que existe, basándonos en tres parámetros principales, estereotipias, mortalidad de lechones y enfermedades parasitarias, de igual manera lograr analizar estos tipos de sistemas en relación con el bienestar animal, basándonos en los principios de las 5 libertades.Médico(a) Veterinario(a)PregradoPresencialspaUniversidad Antonio NariñoMedicina VeterinariaFacultad de Medicina VeterinariaBogotá - CircunvalarBienestar animalsistemas de producción porcinasistemas intensivos de producción de cerdossistemas orgánicos de producción de cerdosbienestar en cerdas gestantesbienestar en cerdas en etapa de lactanciaprotocolos de sistemas orgánicos en cerdossistemas tipo outdoormortalidad de lechonesparasitismo en producciones porcinasestereotipias en cerdosenriquecimiento medioambiental en cerdosAnimal welfarepig production systemsintensive pig production systemsorganic pig production systemswelfare in pregnant sowswelfare in lactating sowsprotocols for organic systems in pigsoutdoor type systemspiglet mortalityparasitism in pig productionsstereotypies in pigsenvironmental enrichment in pigsRevisión literaria – ventajas y desventajas de los sistemas “outdoor” sobre el bienestar de cerdas en gestación y lactancia.Trabajo de grado (Pregrado y/o Especialización)http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1fhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85ORIGINAL2020JennyPaolaAngelGonzalez.pdf2020JennyPaolaAngelGonzalez.pdfTrabajo de gradoapplication/pdf1351761https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/bitstreams/04d6f5c9-de68-42da-a106-3bd2f5c00f1f/downloadfd78f8e5e568cb10ae3636138f97e6dbMD512020AutorizaciondeAutores.pdf2020AutorizaciondeAutores.pdfAutorización de autoresapplication/pdf442184https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/bitstreams/75386da8-c088-4db0-ac50-6569ccccd284/download2b5e71bbe16328abdb57646752643054MD52CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8914https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/bitstreams/148e6feb-7c12-406e-83a1-6c5b98763247/download2b2ab6ec8a6a222739b9c0e57c635c2eMD53LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82710https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/bitstreams/1966f6ea-03f2-481c-bab1-b36f6d246c63/download2e388663398085f69421c9e4c5fcf235MD54123456789/2693oai:repositorio.uan.edu.co:123456789/26932024-10-09 23:32:52.981https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Acceso a solo metadatosopen.accesshttps://repositorio.uan.edu.coRepositorio Institucional UANalertas.repositorio@uan.edu.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

Revisión literaria – ventajas y desventajas de los sistemas “outdoor” sobre el bienestar de cerdas en gestación y lactancia.

Publicaciones similares