A legacy still alive: between tradition and contemporaneity

The configuration of a bachelor’s program in performing arts (previously a bachelor’s degree in arts education with an emphasis on dance and theater) promotes the constructionof a field of study that is recent in our country. In that sense, building alegacy implies recognizing our own face in the mi...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2017
Institución:
Universidad Antonio Nariño
Repositorio:
Repositorio UAN
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.uan.edu.co:123456789/10876
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.uan.edu.co/index.php/papeles/article/view/495
https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/10876
Palabra clave:
legado
maestro-artista
artes escénicas
tradición
contemporaneidad
legacy
teacher-artist
performing arts
tradition
contemporaneity
cultural construction
Rights
License
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
id UAntonioN2_46e95b24e97054821423fb87de98005e
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.uan.edu.co:123456789/10876
network_acronym_str UAntonioN2
network_name_str Repositorio UAN
repository_id_str
dc.title.en-US.fl_str_mv A legacy still alive: between tradition and contemporaneity
dc.title.es-ES.fl_str_mv Un legado que permanece vivo: entre la tradición y la contemporaneidad
title A legacy still alive: between tradition and contemporaneity
spellingShingle A legacy still alive: between tradition and contemporaneity
legado
maestro-artista
artes escénicas
tradición
contemporaneidad
legacy
teacher-artist
performing arts
tradition
contemporaneity
cultural construction
title_short A legacy still alive: between tradition and contemporaneity
title_full A legacy still alive: between tradition and contemporaneity
title_fullStr A legacy still alive: between tradition and contemporaneity
title_full_unstemmed A legacy still alive: between tradition and contemporaneity
title_sort A legacy still alive: between tradition and contemporaneity
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv legado
maestro-artista
artes escénicas
tradición
contemporaneidad
topic legado
maestro-artista
artes escénicas
tradición
contemporaneidad
legacy
teacher-artist
performing arts
tradition
contemporaneity
cultural construction
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv legacy
teacher-artist
performing arts
tradition
contemporaneity
cultural construction
description The configuration of a bachelor’s program in performing arts (previously a bachelor’s degree in arts education with an emphasis on dance and theater) promotes the constructionof a field of study that is recent in our country. In that sense, building alegacy implies recognizing our own face in the mirror of history. Although German historiography - so important in the nineteenth century - stopped at the historical as a narrative of great stories and heroics, in the XX and XXI centuries the Annales School will investigate the fleeting, the transitory and the allowance. History is constituted by those intimate and fragmentary stories that help to consolidate the destinyof nations. Thus, our story starts with building a memory that allows us to leave sensitive evidence of the construction of a field that is vanishing nowadays: tradition. Thecrisis of representation, the anguish of images, the passion aroused by networks, the virtuality and the desire for permanent technological innovation, seem to leave outthe constitution of the historical personality, for that reason our program promotes a controversial field between tradition and contemporaneity. The tradition, thought from a wide perspective, is not conceived as everything that remains static and probably cornered and closed in the walls of the museum. Tradition was not a becoming;it remains being as a cultural construction that defines us as humans although the speed of our present time insists on subjugate us. What we are today comes from faraway, in the Hegelian sense of recognizing the historical trajectory as the unfolding of the spirit. Our traditions are legacies that remain alive and that continue up tobe built in an open look to the future. Therefore, we insist on our program to leave evidences of a memory that we have built for thirty years.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2024-10-10T02:35:03Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2024-10-10T02:35:03Z
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-04-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uan.edu.co/index.php/papeles/article/view/495
10.54104/papeles.v9n18.495
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/10876
url https://revistas.uan.edu.co/index.php/papeles/article/view/495
https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/10876
identifier_str_mv 10.54104/papeles.v9n18.495
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uan.edu.co/index.php/papeles/article/view/495/424
dc.rights.en-US.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.en-US.fl_str_mv UNIVERSIDAD ANTONIO NARIÑO
dc.source.en-US.fl_str_mv Papeles; Vol. 9 No. 18 (2017); 73-85
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv Papeles; Vol. 9 Núm. 18 (2017); 73-85
dc.source.pt-BR.fl_str_mv Papeles; v. 9 n. 18 (2017); 73-85
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv 2346-0911
0123-0670
10.54104/papeles.v9n18
institution Universidad Antonio Nariño
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional UAN
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alertas.repositorio@uan.edu.co
_version_ 1814300351200755712
spelling 2017-04-122024-10-10T02:35:03Z2024-10-10T02:35:03Zhttps://revistas.uan.edu.co/index.php/papeles/article/view/49510.54104/papeles.v9n18.495https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/10876The configuration of a bachelor’s program in performing arts (previously a bachelor’s degree in arts education with an emphasis on dance and theater) promotes the constructionof a field of study that is recent in our country. In that sense, building alegacy implies recognizing our own face in the mirror of history. Although German historiography - so important in the nineteenth century - stopped at the historical as a narrative of great stories and heroics, in the XX and XXI centuries the Annales School will investigate the fleeting, the transitory and the allowance. History is constituted by those intimate and fragmentary stories that help to consolidate the destinyof nations. Thus, our story starts with building a memory that allows us to leave sensitive evidence of the construction of a field that is vanishing nowadays: tradition. Thecrisis of representation, the anguish of images, the passion aroused by networks, the virtuality and the desire for permanent technological innovation, seem to leave outthe constitution of the historical personality, for that reason our program promotes a controversial field between tradition and contemporaneity. The tradition, thought from a wide perspective, is not conceived as everything that remains static and probably cornered and closed in the walls of the museum. Tradition was not a becoming;it remains being as a cultural construction that defines us as humans although the speed of our present time insists on subjugate us. What we are today comes from faraway, in the Hegelian sense of recognizing the historical trajectory as the unfolding of the spirit. Our traditions are legacies that remain alive and that continue up tobe built in an open look to the future. Therefore, we insist on our program to leave evidences of a memory that we have built for thirty years.La configuración de un programa de licenciatura en artes escénicas (antes licenciatura en educación artística con énfasis en danza y teatro) promueve la construcción de un campo de estudio que en nuestro país es reciente. En ese sentido, construir un legado implica reconocer nuestro propio rostro en el espejo de la historia. Si bien la historiografía alemana – tan importante en el siglo XIX – se detenía en lo histórico como narración de los grandes relatos y las heroicidades, en los siglos XX y XXI la Escuela de los Annales va a indagar en lo fugaz, lo transitorio y lo contingente. La historia se constituye de esos relatos íntimos y fragmentarios que ayudan a consolidar el destino de las naciones. Así, nuestro relato parte de construir una memoria que permita dejar evidencia sensible de la construcción de un campo que se desvanece: la tradición. La crisis de representación, la angustia de las imágenes, la pasión que despiertan las redes, la virtualidad y el afán de innovación tecnológica permanente, parecen dejar por fuera la constitución de la personalidad histórica, por ello nuestro programa promueve un campo polémico entre la tradición y la contemporaneidad. La tradición, pensada desde una perspectiva amplia, no se concibe como aquello que permanece estático y probablemente acorralado en las paredes del museo. La tradición es un devenir que no fue, sino que permanece siendo, es decir: la tradición es una construcción cultural que nos define como humanos, aunque la velocidad del presente insista en avasallarnos. Lo que somos hoy viene de lejos, en el sentido hegeliano de reconocer la trayectoria histórica como el despliegue del espíritu. Nuestras tradiciones son legados que permanecen vivos y que se siguen construyendo en una mirada abierta al futuro. Por ello insistimos en nuestro programa en dejar evidencias de una memoria que hemos construido durante cuarenta años.application/pdfspaUNIVERSIDAD ANTONIO NARIÑOhttps://revistas.uan.edu.co/index.php/papeles/article/view/495/424https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Papeles; Vol. 9 No. 18 (2017); 73-85Papeles; Vol. 9 Núm. 18 (2017); 73-85Papeles; v. 9 n. 18 (2017); 73-852346-09110123-067010.54104/papeles.v9n18legadomaestro-artistaartes escénicastradicióncontemporaneidadlegacyteacher-artistperforming artstraditioncontemporaneitycultural constructionA legacy still alive: between tradition and contemporaneityUn legado que permanece vivo: entre la tradición y la contemporaneidadinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Llerena Avendaño, Francisco AlexánderNieves Gil, Angélica del PilarSepúlveda Medina, Carlos EduardoGuzmán Urrego, Edwin Armando123456789/10876oai:repositorio.uan.edu.co:123456789/108762024-10-14 03:46:40.958metadata.onlyhttps://repositorio.uan.edu.coRepositorio Institucional UANalertas.repositorio@uan.edu.co