Comparación de la microfiltración entre resinas de fotocurado con dos sistemas adhesivos, revisión bibliográfica
Objetive: This bibliograpic review of literature had as objetive to compare microleakage through light cure resins used in the odontologic restorative practice with two adhesive sistems. Materials and methods: 74 articles related with the object of study published since 2000 to 2020 was colleted; 44...
- Autores:
-
Morales Llanes, Yesmith Adriana
Panqueva Sanchez, Yuliana Alexandra
Polania Hernández, Daniela Alexandra
- Tipo de recurso:
- Trabajo de grado de pregrado
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2020
- Institución:
- Universidad Antonio Nariño
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio UAN
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.uan.edu.co:123456789/4655
- Acceso en línea:
- http://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/4655
- Palabra clave:
- Microfiltación
resinas Bulk
resinas convencionales
clase II
Rehabilitación Oral
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
id |
UAntonioN2_30ad90420152e40818e66858faf29580 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.uan.edu.co:123456789/4655 |
network_acronym_str |
UAntonioN2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio UAN |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.es_ES.fl_str_mv |
Comparación de la microfiltración entre resinas de fotocurado con dos sistemas adhesivos, revisión bibliográfica |
title |
Comparación de la microfiltración entre resinas de fotocurado con dos sistemas adhesivos, revisión bibliográfica |
spellingShingle |
Comparación de la microfiltración entre resinas de fotocurado con dos sistemas adhesivos, revisión bibliográfica Microfiltación resinas Bulk resinas convencionales clase II Rehabilitación Oral |
title_short |
Comparación de la microfiltración entre resinas de fotocurado con dos sistemas adhesivos, revisión bibliográfica |
title_full |
Comparación de la microfiltración entre resinas de fotocurado con dos sistemas adhesivos, revisión bibliográfica |
title_fullStr |
Comparación de la microfiltración entre resinas de fotocurado con dos sistemas adhesivos, revisión bibliográfica |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparación de la microfiltración entre resinas de fotocurado con dos sistemas adhesivos, revisión bibliográfica |
title_sort |
Comparación de la microfiltración entre resinas de fotocurado con dos sistemas adhesivos, revisión bibliográfica |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Morales Llanes, Yesmith Adriana Panqueva Sanchez, Yuliana Alexandra Polania Hernández, Daniela Alexandra |
dc.contributor.advisor.spa.fl_str_mv |
Jiménez Barba, Gerardo Enrique Ramírez Sulvaran, Jesús Arturo |
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv |
Morales Llanes, Yesmith Adriana Panqueva Sanchez, Yuliana Alexandra Polania Hernández, Daniela Alexandra |
dc.subject.es_ES.fl_str_mv |
Microfiltación resinas Bulk resinas convencionales clase II |
topic |
Microfiltación resinas Bulk resinas convencionales clase II Rehabilitación Oral |
dc.subject.keyword.es_ES.fl_str_mv |
Rehabilitación Oral |
description |
Objetive: This bibliograpic review of literature had as objetive to compare microleakage through light cure resins used in the odontologic restorative practice with two adhesive sistems. Materials and methods: 74 articles related with the object of study published since 2000 to 2020 was colleted; 44 with the most relevance was analyzed and selected, in wich seventy four (74) resins in total was evaluated; of which thirty seven (37) was applied with Bulk Fill technique and thirty seven (37) incremental technique, both aplied techniques with adhesive of conventional etching and self-etching. Results: When comparing data collected resins applied with incremental technique, 43% presented greater microleakage and 57% less microleakage and those applied with Bulk Fill technique, 47% presented less microleakage and 53% showed greater microleakage. Likewise, type of adhesive and the application technique don’t present a meaningful difference in terms of resin composition in forming microleakage. Conclusion: Conventional resins generated less microleakage at the clinical application moment and Bulk Fill generated greater microleakage. Independent application technique of the type of resin to implement didn’t have a meaningful difference. As for the adhesion process of the teeth to restore, none meaningful difference was founded irrespective to the used adhesive. It was determined that the adhesive self-etching must be implement in the presence of dentinal tissue; Finally, it was determined that the conventional adhesive must be implemented in presence of dental enamel. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.issued.spa.fl_str_mv |
2020-11-25 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-19T16:00:08Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-19T16:00:08Z |
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Trabajo de grado (Pregrado y/o Especialización) |
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f |
dc.type.coarversion.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/4655 |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation.spa.fl_str_mv |
Abdelaziz K., Saleh A. (2018). Influence of adhesive-composite application modalities on their bonding to tooth structure and resistance of the performed restorations to failure. Journal of Dental Sciences, 13, 378-385 Abo Al-Hana, D., El-Messairy, A., ShohaybH, F & Alhadainy H. (2013) Micro-shear bond strength of different composites and glass-ionomers used to reinforce root dentin. Tanta Dental Journal, 10, 58-60. Acurio, P., Falcón, G., Casas, L. (2017). Comparación de la resistencia compresiva de resinas convencionales vs resinas tipo Bulk fill. Odontología Vital 27(0),69-77. Alasbahi, B. (2019). A perspective of marginal microleakage in class II composite resin restorations using different types and techniques: an in-vitro study. J Oral Res, 8(1), 22- 29. Zavattini, A., Mancini, M & Mangani F. (2018). Micro-computed tomography evaluation of microleakage of Class II composite restorations: An in vitro study. European Journal of Dentistry, 12(3), 369-374 Weig, K., Magalhães Filho, T., Costa Neto, C., & Costa, M. (2014). Evaluation of polymerization shrinkage of dental composites by an optical method. Materials Science and Engineering, 47(3), 70-76 Welter, C., Aldrighi, E., Oliveira Da Rosa, W., Fernandes Da Silva, A., & Piva, E. (2018) Polymerization shrinkage stress of resin-based dental materials: a systematic reviw and meta-analyses of composition strategies. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 82, 268-281. Watts, D. & Alnazzawi, A. (2014). Temperature-dependent polymerization shrinkagestress kinetics of resin-composites. Material Dental, 30(6), 654-660. Wang, Z. & Chiang, M. (2016b). Correlation between polymerization shrinkagestress and C-factor depends upon cavitycompliance. Dental materials, 32(3), 343–352 Wang, Z. & Chiang, M. (2016a). System compliance dictates the effect of compositefiller content on polymerization shrinkage stress. Dental materials, 32(4), 551-560. |
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad Antonio Nariño |
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional UAN |
dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv |
repourl:https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/ |
url |
http://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/4655 |
identifier_str_mv |
Abdelaziz K., Saleh A. (2018). Influence of adhesive-composite application modalities on their bonding to tooth structure and resistance of the performed restorations to failure. Journal of Dental Sciences, 13, 378-385 Abo Al-Hana, D., El-Messairy, A., ShohaybH, F & Alhadainy H. (2013) Micro-shear bond strength of different composites and glass-ionomers used to reinforce root dentin. Tanta Dental Journal, 10, 58-60. Acurio, P., Falcón, G., Casas, L. (2017). Comparación de la resistencia compresiva de resinas convencionales vs resinas tipo Bulk fill. Odontología Vital 27(0),69-77. Alasbahi, B. (2019). A perspective of marginal microleakage in class II composite resin restorations using different types and techniques: an in-vitro study. J Oral Res, 8(1), 22- 29. Zavattini, A., Mancini, M & Mangani F. (2018). Micro-computed tomography evaluation of microleakage of Class II composite restorations: An in vitro study. European Journal of Dentistry, 12(3), 369-374 Weig, K., Magalhães Filho, T., Costa Neto, C., & Costa, M. (2014). Evaluation of polymerization shrinkage of dental composites by an optical method. Materials Science and Engineering, 47(3), 70-76 Welter, C., Aldrighi, E., Oliveira Da Rosa, W., Fernandes Da Silva, A., & Piva, E. (2018) Polymerization shrinkage stress of resin-based dental materials: a systematic reviw and meta-analyses of composition strategies. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 82, 268-281. Watts, D. & Alnazzawi, A. (2014). Temperature-dependent polymerization shrinkagestress kinetics of resin-composites. Material Dental, 30(6), 654-660. Wang, Z. & Chiang, M. (2016b). Correlation between polymerization shrinkagestress and C-factor depends upon cavitycompliance. Dental materials, 32(3), 343–352 Wang, Z. & Chiang, M. (2016a). System compliance dictates the effect of compositefiller content on polymerization shrinkage stress. Dental materials, 32(4), 551-560. instname:Universidad Antonio Nariño reponame:Repositorio Institucional UAN repourl:https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/ |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Acceso abierto |
dc.rights.license.spa.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) |
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) Acceso abierto https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Antonio Nariño |
dc.publisher.program.spa.fl_str_mv |
Odontología |
dc.publisher.faculty.spa.fl_str_mv |
Facultad de Odontología |
dc.publisher.campus.spa.fl_str_mv |
Cúcuta |
institution |
Universidad Antonio Nariño |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/bitstreams/a1100c75-4d4d-44b4-9c23-3edbd0c056c0/download https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/bitstreams/175712cd-533c-40b9-b766-f8efad46f80b/download https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/bitstreams/ff36fa5e-7ec7-4d85-9aae-564466d919dc/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
b412963affc40f035397d21aa6b03ae5 fa079aafb638ef91ffa146c3090b84ca d5aa97326fe4f34761c79bd340ca0f44 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional UAN |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
alertas.repositorio@uan.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814300445886119936 |
spelling |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)Acceso abiertohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Jiménez Barba, Gerardo EnriqueRamírez Sulvaran, Jesús ArturoMorales Llanes, Yesmith AdrianaPanqueva Sanchez, Yuliana AlexandraPolania Hernández, Daniela Alexandra2057161584520571619223205718186502021-08-19T16:00:08Z2021-08-19T16:00:08Z2020-11-25http://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/4655Abdelaziz K., Saleh A. (2018). Influence of adhesive-composite application modalities on their bonding to tooth structure and resistance of the performed restorations to failure. Journal of Dental Sciences, 13, 378-385Abo Al-Hana, D., El-Messairy, A., ShohaybH, F & Alhadainy H. (2013) Micro-shear bond strength of different composites and glass-ionomers used to reinforce root dentin. Tanta Dental Journal, 10, 58-60.Acurio, P., Falcón, G., Casas, L. (2017). Comparación de la resistencia compresiva de resinas convencionales vs resinas tipo Bulk fill. Odontología Vital 27(0),69-77.Alasbahi, B. (2019). A perspective of marginal microleakage in class II composite resin restorations using different types and techniques: an in-vitro study. J Oral Res, 8(1), 22- 29.Zavattini, A., Mancini, M & Mangani F. (2018). Micro-computed tomography evaluation of microleakage of Class II composite restorations: An in vitro study. European Journal of Dentistry, 12(3), 369-374Weig, K., Magalhães Filho, T., Costa Neto, C., & Costa, M. (2014). Evaluation of polymerization shrinkage of dental composites by an optical method. Materials Science and Engineering, 47(3), 70-76Welter, C., Aldrighi, E., Oliveira Da Rosa, W., Fernandes Da Silva, A., & Piva, E. (2018) Polymerization shrinkage stress of resin-based dental materials: a systematic reviw and meta-analyses of composition strategies. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 82, 268-281.Watts, D. & Alnazzawi, A. (2014). Temperature-dependent polymerization shrinkagestress kinetics of resin-composites. Material Dental, 30(6), 654-660.Wang, Z. & Chiang, M. (2016b). Correlation between polymerization shrinkagestress and C-factor depends upon cavitycompliance. Dental materials, 32(3), 343–352Wang, Z. & Chiang, M. (2016a). System compliance dictates the effect of compositefiller content on polymerization shrinkage stress. Dental materials, 32(4), 551-560.instname:Universidad Antonio Nariñoreponame:Repositorio Institucional UANrepourl:https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/Objetive: This bibliograpic review of literature had as objetive to compare microleakage through light cure resins used in the odontologic restorative practice with two adhesive sistems. Materials and methods: 74 articles related with the object of study published since 2000 to 2020 was colleted; 44 with the most relevance was analyzed and selected, in wich seventy four (74) resins in total was evaluated; of which thirty seven (37) was applied with Bulk Fill technique and thirty seven (37) incremental technique, both aplied techniques with adhesive of conventional etching and self-etching. Results: When comparing data collected resins applied with incremental technique, 43% presented greater microleakage and 57% less microleakage and those applied with Bulk Fill technique, 47% presented less microleakage and 53% showed greater microleakage. Likewise, type of adhesive and the application technique don’t present a meaningful difference in terms of resin composition in forming microleakage. Conclusion: Conventional resins generated less microleakage at the clinical application moment and Bulk Fill generated greater microleakage. Independent application technique of the type of resin to implement didn’t have a meaningful difference. As for the adhesion process of the teeth to restore, none meaningful difference was founded irrespective to the used adhesive. It was determined that the adhesive self-etching must be implement in the presence of dentinal tissue; Finally, it was determined that the conventional adhesive must be implemented in presence of dental enamel.Objetivo: el objetivo de esta revisión bibliográfica de literatura fue la comparación de la microfiltración entre resinas de fotocurado usadas en la práctica odontológica restaurativa con dos sistemas adhesivos. Materiales y métodos: Se recopilaron 74 artículos relacionados con el objeto de estudio publicados desde el año 2000 hasta el año 2020; se analizaron y seleccionaron 44 artículos que tuvieron mayor importancia, donde se evaluaron en total setenta y cuatro (74) resinas; de las cuales treinta y siete (37) fueron aplicadas con técnica Bulk Fill y treinta y siete (37) con técnica incremental, ambas técnicas aplicadas con adhesivos de grabado convencional y autograbador. Resultados: Al comparar los datos obtenidos las resinas aplicadas con técnica incremental, el 43% presentó mayor microfiltración y 57% presentó menor microfiltración y las aplicadas con técnica Bulk Fill, el 47% arrojaron menor microfiltración y 53% tuvieron mayor microfiltración. Así mismo el tipo de adhesivo y la técnica de aplicación no presenta una diferencia significativa en cuanto al compuesto de resina en la formación de las microfiltraciones. Conclusión: Las resinas convencionales generaron menor microfiltración al momento de su aplicación clínica y las resinas de tipo Bulk Fill generaron mayor microfiltración; la técnica de aplicación independiente del tipo de resina a implementar no tuvo diferencia significativa; en cuanto al proceso de adhesión del diente a restaurar, no se encontró diferencia significativa independientemente del adhesivo que se use; se determinó que el adhesivo autograbador debe ser implementado en presencia de tejido dentinario; finalmente se determinó que el adhesivo convencional debe ser implementado en presencia de esmalte.Odontólogo(a)PregradoPresencialInvestigaciónspaUniversidad Antonio NariñoOdontologíaFacultad de OdontologíaCúcutaMicrofiltaciónresinas Bulkresinas convencionalesclase IIRehabilitación OralComparación de la microfiltración entre resinas de fotocurado con dos sistemas adhesivos, revisión bibliográficaTrabajo de grado (Pregrado y/o Especialización)http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1fhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85GeneralORIGINAL2020_YesmithMorales2020_YesmithMoralesTRABAJO DE GRADOapplication/pdf967886https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/bitstreams/a1100c75-4d4d-44b4-9c23-3edbd0c056c0/downloadb412963affc40f035397d21aa6b03ae5MD532020_YesmithMorales_Acta2020_YesmithMorales_ActaACTA DE SUSTENTACIONapplication/pdf165389https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/bitstreams/175712cd-533c-40b9-b766-f8efad46f80b/downloadfa079aafb638ef91ffa146c3090b84caMD512020_YesmithMorales_Autorización2020_YesmithMorales_AutorizaciónAUTORIZACION 1, 2 Y 3application/pdf921720https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/bitstreams/ff36fa5e-7ec7-4d85-9aae-564466d919dc/downloadd5aa97326fe4f34761c79bd340ca0f44MD52123456789/4655oai:repositorio.uan.edu.co:123456789/46552024-10-09 23:28:41.473https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Acceso abiertoopen.accesshttps://repositorio.uan.edu.coRepositorio Institucional UANalertas.repositorio@uan.edu.co |