Comparación de la microfiltración entre resinas de fotocurado con dos sistemas adhesivos, revisión bibliográfica

Objetive: This bibliograpic review of literature had as objetive to compare microleakage through light cure resins used in the odontologic restorative practice with two adhesive sistems. Materials and methods: 74 articles related with the object of study published since 2000 to 2020 was colleted; 44...

Full description

Autores:
Morales Llanes, Yesmith Adriana
Panqueva Sanchez, Yuliana Alexandra
Polania Hernández, Daniela Alexandra
Tipo de recurso:
Trabajo de grado de pregrado
Fecha de publicación:
2020
Institución:
Universidad Antonio Nariño
Repositorio:
Repositorio UAN
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.uan.edu.co:123456789/4655
Acceso en línea:
http://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/4655
Palabra clave:
Microfiltación
resinas Bulk
resinas convencionales
clase II
Rehabilitación Oral
Rights
openAccess
License
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
id UAntonioN2_30ad90420152e40818e66858faf29580
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.uan.edu.co:123456789/4655
network_acronym_str UAntonioN2
network_name_str Repositorio UAN
repository_id_str
dc.title.es_ES.fl_str_mv Comparación de la microfiltración entre resinas de fotocurado con dos sistemas adhesivos, revisión bibliográfica
title Comparación de la microfiltración entre resinas de fotocurado con dos sistemas adhesivos, revisión bibliográfica
spellingShingle Comparación de la microfiltración entre resinas de fotocurado con dos sistemas adhesivos, revisión bibliográfica
Microfiltación
resinas Bulk
resinas convencionales
clase II
Rehabilitación Oral
title_short Comparación de la microfiltración entre resinas de fotocurado con dos sistemas adhesivos, revisión bibliográfica
title_full Comparación de la microfiltración entre resinas de fotocurado con dos sistemas adhesivos, revisión bibliográfica
title_fullStr Comparación de la microfiltración entre resinas de fotocurado con dos sistemas adhesivos, revisión bibliográfica
title_full_unstemmed Comparación de la microfiltración entre resinas de fotocurado con dos sistemas adhesivos, revisión bibliográfica
title_sort Comparación de la microfiltración entre resinas de fotocurado con dos sistemas adhesivos, revisión bibliográfica
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Morales Llanes, Yesmith Adriana
Panqueva Sanchez, Yuliana Alexandra
Polania Hernández, Daniela Alexandra
dc.contributor.advisor.spa.fl_str_mv Jiménez Barba, Gerardo Enrique
Ramírez Sulvaran, Jesús Arturo
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Morales Llanes, Yesmith Adriana
Panqueva Sanchez, Yuliana Alexandra
Polania Hernández, Daniela Alexandra
dc.subject.es_ES.fl_str_mv Microfiltación
resinas Bulk
resinas convencionales
clase II
topic Microfiltación
resinas Bulk
resinas convencionales
clase II
Rehabilitación Oral
dc.subject.keyword.es_ES.fl_str_mv Rehabilitación Oral
description Objetive: This bibliograpic review of literature had as objetive to compare microleakage through light cure resins used in the odontologic restorative practice with two adhesive sistems. Materials and methods: 74 articles related with the object of study published since 2000 to 2020 was colleted; 44 with the most relevance was analyzed and selected, in wich seventy four (74) resins in total was evaluated; of which thirty seven (37) was applied with Bulk Fill technique and thirty seven (37) incremental technique, both aplied techniques with adhesive of conventional etching and self-etching. Results: When comparing data collected resins applied with incremental technique, 43% presented greater microleakage and 57% less microleakage and those applied with Bulk Fill technique, 47% presented less microleakage and 53% showed greater microleakage. Likewise, type of adhesive and the application technique don’t present a meaningful difference in terms of resin composition in forming microleakage. Conclusion: Conventional resins generated less microleakage at the clinical application moment and Bulk Fill generated greater microleakage. Independent application technique of the type of resin to implement didn’t have a meaningful difference. As for the adhesion process of the teeth to restore, none meaningful difference was founded irrespective to the used adhesive. It was determined that the adhesive self-etching must be implement in the presence of dentinal tissue; Finally, it was determined that the conventional adhesive must be implemented in presence of dental enamel.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.issued.spa.fl_str_mv 2020-11-25
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2021-08-19T16:00:08Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2021-08-19T16:00:08Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Trabajo de grado (Pregrado y/o Especialización)
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.coarversion.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/4655
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation.spa.fl_str_mv Abdelaziz K., Saleh A. (2018). Influence of adhesive-composite application modalities on their bonding to tooth structure and resistance of the performed restorations to failure. Journal of Dental Sciences, 13, 378-385
Abo Al-Hana, D., El-Messairy, A., ShohaybH, F & Alhadainy H. (2013) Micro-shear bond strength of different composites and glass-ionomers used to reinforce root dentin. Tanta Dental Journal, 10, 58-60.
Acurio, P., Falcón, G., Casas, L. (2017). Comparación de la resistencia compresiva de resinas convencionales vs resinas tipo Bulk fill. Odontología Vital 27(0),69-77.
Alasbahi, B. (2019). A perspective of marginal microleakage in class II composite resin restorations using different types and techniques: an in-vitro study. J Oral Res, 8(1), 22- 29.
Zavattini, A., Mancini, M & Mangani F. (2018). Micro-computed tomography evaluation of microleakage of Class II composite restorations: An in vitro study. European Journal of Dentistry, 12(3), 369-374
Weig, K., Magalhães Filho, T., Costa Neto, C., & Costa, M. (2014). Evaluation of polymerization shrinkage of dental composites by an optical method. Materials Science and Engineering, 47(3), 70-76
Welter, C., Aldrighi, E., Oliveira Da Rosa, W., Fernandes Da Silva, A., & Piva, E. (2018) Polymerization shrinkage stress of resin-based dental materials: a systematic reviw and meta-analyses of composition strategies. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 82, 268-281.
Watts, D. & Alnazzawi, A. (2014). Temperature-dependent polymerization shrinkagestress kinetics of resin-composites. Material Dental, 30(6), 654-660.
Wang, Z. & Chiang, M. (2016b). Correlation between polymerization shrinkagestress and C-factor depends upon cavitycompliance. Dental materials, 32(3), 343–352
Wang, Z. & Chiang, M. (2016a). System compliance dictates the effect of compositefiller content on polymerization shrinkage stress. Dental materials, 32(4), 551-560.
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad Antonio Nariño
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional UAN
dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv repourl:https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/
url http://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/4655
identifier_str_mv Abdelaziz K., Saleh A. (2018). Influence of adhesive-composite application modalities on their bonding to tooth structure and resistance of the performed restorations to failure. Journal of Dental Sciences, 13, 378-385
Abo Al-Hana, D., El-Messairy, A., ShohaybH, F & Alhadainy H. (2013) Micro-shear bond strength of different composites and glass-ionomers used to reinforce root dentin. Tanta Dental Journal, 10, 58-60.
Acurio, P., Falcón, G., Casas, L. (2017). Comparación de la resistencia compresiva de resinas convencionales vs resinas tipo Bulk fill. Odontología Vital 27(0),69-77.
Alasbahi, B. (2019). A perspective of marginal microleakage in class II composite resin restorations using different types and techniques: an in-vitro study. J Oral Res, 8(1), 22- 29.
Zavattini, A., Mancini, M & Mangani F. (2018). Micro-computed tomography evaluation of microleakage of Class II composite restorations: An in vitro study. European Journal of Dentistry, 12(3), 369-374
Weig, K., Magalhães Filho, T., Costa Neto, C., & Costa, M. (2014). Evaluation of polymerization shrinkage of dental composites by an optical method. Materials Science and Engineering, 47(3), 70-76
Welter, C., Aldrighi, E., Oliveira Da Rosa, W., Fernandes Da Silva, A., & Piva, E. (2018) Polymerization shrinkage stress of resin-based dental materials: a systematic reviw and meta-analyses of composition strategies. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 82, 268-281.
Watts, D. & Alnazzawi, A. (2014). Temperature-dependent polymerization shrinkagestress kinetics of resin-composites. Material Dental, 30(6), 654-660.
Wang, Z. & Chiang, M. (2016b). Correlation between polymerization shrinkagestress and C-factor depends upon cavitycompliance. Dental materials, 32(3), 343–352
Wang, Z. & Chiang, M. (2016a). System compliance dictates the effect of compositefiller content on polymerization shrinkage stress. Dental materials, 32(4), 551-560.
instname:Universidad Antonio Nariño
reponame:Repositorio Institucional UAN
repourl:https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Acceso abierto
dc.rights.license.spa.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Acceso abierto
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Antonio Nariño
dc.publisher.program.spa.fl_str_mv Odontología
dc.publisher.faculty.spa.fl_str_mv Facultad de Odontología
dc.publisher.campus.spa.fl_str_mv Cúcuta
institution Universidad Antonio Nariño
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/bitstreams/a1100c75-4d4d-44b4-9c23-3edbd0c056c0/download
https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/bitstreams/175712cd-533c-40b9-b766-f8efad46f80b/download
https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/bitstreams/ff36fa5e-7ec7-4d85-9aae-564466d919dc/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv b412963affc40f035397d21aa6b03ae5
fa079aafb638ef91ffa146c3090b84ca
d5aa97326fe4f34761c79bd340ca0f44
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional UAN
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alertas.repositorio@uan.edu.co
_version_ 1814300445886119936
spelling Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)Acceso abiertohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Jiménez Barba, Gerardo EnriqueRamírez Sulvaran, Jesús ArturoMorales Llanes, Yesmith AdrianaPanqueva Sanchez, Yuliana AlexandraPolania Hernández, Daniela Alexandra2057161584520571619223205718186502021-08-19T16:00:08Z2021-08-19T16:00:08Z2020-11-25http://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/4655Abdelaziz K., Saleh A. (2018). Influence of adhesive-composite application modalities on their bonding to tooth structure and resistance of the performed restorations to failure. Journal of Dental Sciences, 13, 378-385Abo Al-Hana, D., El-Messairy, A., ShohaybH, F & Alhadainy H. (2013) Micro-shear bond strength of different composites and glass-ionomers used to reinforce root dentin. Tanta Dental Journal, 10, 58-60.Acurio, P., Falcón, G., Casas, L. (2017). Comparación de la resistencia compresiva de resinas convencionales vs resinas tipo Bulk fill. Odontología Vital 27(0),69-77.Alasbahi, B. (2019). A perspective of marginal microleakage in class II composite resin restorations using different types and techniques: an in-vitro study. J Oral Res, 8(1), 22- 29.Zavattini, A., Mancini, M & Mangani F. (2018). Micro-computed tomography evaluation of microleakage of Class II composite restorations: An in vitro study. European Journal of Dentistry, 12(3), 369-374Weig, K., Magalhães Filho, T., Costa Neto, C., & Costa, M. (2014). Evaluation of polymerization shrinkage of dental composites by an optical method. Materials Science and Engineering, 47(3), 70-76Welter, C., Aldrighi, E., Oliveira Da Rosa, W., Fernandes Da Silva, A., & Piva, E. (2018) Polymerization shrinkage stress of resin-based dental materials: a systematic reviw and meta-analyses of composition strategies. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 82, 268-281.Watts, D. & Alnazzawi, A. (2014). Temperature-dependent polymerization shrinkagestress kinetics of resin-composites. Material Dental, 30(6), 654-660.Wang, Z. & Chiang, M. (2016b). Correlation between polymerization shrinkagestress and C-factor depends upon cavitycompliance. Dental materials, 32(3), 343–352Wang, Z. & Chiang, M. (2016a). System compliance dictates the effect of compositefiller content on polymerization shrinkage stress. Dental materials, 32(4), 551-560.instname:Universidad Antonio Nariñoreponame:Repositorio Institucional UANrepourl:https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/Objetive: This bibliograpic review of literature had as objetive to compare microleakage through light cure resins used in the odontologic restorative practice with two adhesive sistems. Materials and methods: 74 articles related with the object of study published since 2000 to 2020 was colleted; 44 with the most relevance was analyzed and selected, in wich seventy four (74) resins in total was evaluated; of which thirty seven (37) was applied with Bulk Fill technique and thirty seven (37) incremental technique, both aplied techniques with adhesive of conventional etching and self-etching. Results: When comparing data collected resins applied with incremental technique, 43% presented greater microleakage and 57% less microleakage and those applied with Bulk Fill technique, 47% presented less microleakage and 53% showed greater microleakage. Likewise, type of adhesive and the application technique don’t present a meaningful difference in terms of resin composition in forming microleakage. Conclusion: Conventional resins generated less microleakage at the clinical application moment and Bulk Fill generated greater microleakage. Independent application technique of the type of resin to implement didn’t have a meaningful difference. As for the adhesion process of the teeth to restore, none meaningful difference was founded irrespective to the used adhesive. It was determined that the adhesive self-etching must be implement in the presence of dentinal tissue; Finally, it was determined that the conventional adhesive must be implemented in presence of dental enamel.Objetivo: el objetivo de esta revisión bibliográfica de literatura fue la comparación de la microfiltración entre resinas de fotocurado usadas en la práctica odontológica restaurativa con dos sistemas adhesivos. Materiales y métodos: Se recopilaron 74 artículos relacionados con el objeto de estudio publicados desde el año 2000 hasta el año 2020; se analizaron y seleccionaron 44 artículos que tuvieron mayor importancia, donde se evaluaron en total setenta y cuatro (74) resinas; de las cuales treinta y siete (37) fueron aplicadas con técnica Bulk Fill y treinta y siete (37) con técnica incremental, ambas técnicas aplicadas con adhesivos de grabado convencional y autograbador. Resultados: Al comparar los datos obtenidos las resinas aplicadas con técnica incremental, el 43% presentó mayor microfiltración y 57% presentó menor microfiltración y las aplicadas con técnica Bulk Fill, el 47% arrojaron menor microfiltración y 53% tuvieron mayor microfiltración. Así mismo el tipo de adhesivo y la técnica de aplicación no presenta una diferencia significativa en cuanto al compuesto de resina en la formación de las microfiltraciones. Conclusión: Las resinas convencionales generaron menor microfiltración al momento de su aplicación clínica y las resinas de tipo Bulk Fill generaron mayor microfiltración; la técnica de aplicación independiente del tipo de resina a implementar no tuvo diferencia significativa; en cuanto al proceso de adhesión del diente a restaurar, no se encontró diferencia significativa independientemente del adhesivo que se use; se determinó que el adhesivo autograbador debe ser implementado en presencia de tejido dentinario; finalmente se determinó que el adhesivo convencional debe ser implementado en presencia de esmalte.Odontólogo(a)PregradoPresencialInvestigaciónspaUniversidad Antonio NariñoOdontologíaFacultad de OdontologíaCúcutaMicrofiltaciónresinas Bulkresinas convencionalesclase IIRehabilitación OralComparación de la microfiltración entre resinas de fotocurado con dos sistemas adhesivos, revisión bibliográficaTrabajo de grado (Pregrado y/o Especialización)http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1fhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85GeneralORIGINAL2020_YesmithMorales2020_YesmithMoralesTRABAJO DE GRADOapplication/pdf967886https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/bitstreams/a1100c75-4d4d-44b4-9c23-3edbd0c056c0/downloadb412963affc40f035397d21aa6b03ae5MD532020_YesmithMorales_Acta2020_YesmithMorales_ActaACTA DE SUSTENTACIONapplication/pdf165389https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/bitstreams/175712cd-533c-40b9-b766-f8efad46f80b/downloadfa079aafb638ef91ffa146c3090b84caMD512020_YesmithMorales_Autorización2020_YesmithMorales_AutorizaciónAUTORIZACION 1, 2 Y 3application/pdf921720https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/bitstreams/ff36fa5e-7ec7-4d85-9aae-564466d919dc/downloadd5aa97326fe4f34761c79bd340ca0f44MD52123456789/4655oai:repositorio.uan.edu.co:123456789/46552024-10-09 23:28:41.473https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Acceso abiertoopen.accesshttps://repositorio.uan.edu.coRepositorio Institucional UANalertas.repositorio@uan.edu.co