Comparación de la microfiltración entre resinas de fotocurado con dos sistemas adhesivos, revisión bibliográfica
Objetive: This bibliograpic review of literature had as objetive to compare microleakage through light cure resins used in the odontologic restorative practice with two adhesive sistems. Materials and methods: 74 articles related with the object of study published since 2000 to 2020 was colleted; 44...
- Autores:
-
Morales Llanes, Yesmith Adriana
Panqueva Sanchez, Yuliana Alexandra
Polania Hernández, Daniela Alexandra
- Tipo de recurso:
- Trabajo de grado de pregrado
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2020
- Institución:
- Universidad Antonio Nariño
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio UAN
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.uan.edu.co:123456789/4655
- Acceso en línea:
- http://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/4655
- Palabra clave:
- Microfiltación
resinas Bulk
resinas convencionales
clase II
Rehabilitación Oral
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Summary: | Objetive: This bibliograpic review of literature had as objetive to compare microleakage through light cure resins used in the odontologic restorative practice with two adhesive sistems. Materials and methods: 74 articles related with the object of study published since 2000 to 2020 was colleted; 44 with the most relevance was analyzed and selected, in wich seventy four (74) resins in total was evaluated; of which thirty seven (37) was applied with Bulk Fill technique and thirty seven (37) incremental technique, both aplied techniques with adhesive of conventional etching and self-etching. Results: When comparing data collected resins applied with incremental technique, 43% presented greater microleakage and 57% less microleakage and those applied with Bulk Fill technique, 47% presented less microleakage and 53% showed greater microleakage. Likewise, type of adhesive and the application technique don’t present a meaningful difference in terms of resin composition in forming microleakage. Conclusion: Conventional resins generated less microleakage at the clinical application moment and Bulk Fill generated greater microleakage. Independent application technique of the type of resin to implement didn’t have a meaningful difference. As for the adhesion process of the teeth to restore, none meaningful difference was founded irrespective to the used adhesive. It was determined that the adhesive self-etching must be implement in the presence of dentinal tissue; Finally, it was determined that the conventional adhesive must be implemented in presence of dental enamel. |
---|