The dispute between Newton and Leibniz: Calculus

Professor Miguel Mendez offers a brief historical review of the dispute between Newton and Leibniz over authorship and priority in the creation of the Calculus. The controversy began in 1711 when John Keill, a follower of Newton, accused Leibniz of plagiarism in an article. Leibniz responded, claimi...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2024
Institución:
Universidad Antonio Nariño
Repositorio:
Repositorio UAN
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.uan.edu.co:123456789/11160
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.uan.edu.co/index.php/saywa/article/view/1825
https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/11160
Palabra clave:
Cálculo integral
Cálculo diferencial
Historia de la ciencia
History of science
Differential calculus
Integral calculus
Rights
License
Derechos de autor 2024 Miguel Ángel Méndez Pérez
id UAntonioN2_19bbb47a7d58d02c82add3404b913428
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.uan.edu.co:123456789/11160
network_acronym_str UAntonioN2
network_name_str Repositorio UAN
repository_id_str
spelling 2024-01-182024-10-10T02:55:28Z2024-10-10T02:55:28Zhttps://revistas.uan.edu.co/index.php/saywa/article/view/182510.54104/saywa.v5n6.1825https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/11160Professor Miguel Mendez offers a brief historical review of the dispute between Newton and Leibniz over authorship and priority in the creation of the Calculus. The controversy began in 1711 when John Keill, a follower of Newton, accused Leibniz of plagiarism in an article. Leibniz responded, claiming that he was unaware of Newton's method of fluxions when he wrote his papers. The Royal Society appointed a committee that issued a verdict in favor of Newton, without giving Leibniz an opportunity to defend himself. The dispute was continued in pamphlets and correspondence, even after Leibniz's death.El profesor Miguel Mendez ofrece una breve reseña histórica de la disputa entre Newton y Leibniz sobre la autoría y prioridad en la creación del Cálculo. La controversia comenzó en 1711 cuando John Keill, seguidor de Newton, acusó a Leibniz de plagio en un artículo. Leibniz respondió, alegando que desconocía el método de fluxiones de Newton cuando escribió sus artículos. La Royal Society nombró un comité que emitió un veredicto en favor de Newton, sin dar oportunidad a Leibniz de defenderse. La disputa continuó en panfletos y correspondencia, incluso después de la muerte de Leibniz.application/pdfspaUNIVERSIDAD ANTONIO NARIÑOhttps://revistas.uan.edu.co/index.php/saywa/article/view/1825/1410Derechos de autor 2024 Miguel Ángel Méndez Pérezhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2REVISTA SAYWA; Vol. 5 Núm. 6 (2023); 49-522744-85762711-157110.54104/saywa.v5n6Cálculo integralCálculo diferencialHistoria de la cienciaHistory of scienceDifferential calculusIntegral calculusThe dispute between Newton and Leibniz: CalculusLa diatriba entre Newton y Leibniz: el cálculoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Méndez Pérez, Miguel Ángel123456789/11160oai:repositorio.uan.edu.co:123456789/111602024-10-14 03:49:53.057metadata.onlyhttps://repositorio.uan.edu.coRepositorio Institucional UANalertas.repositorio@uan.edu.co
dc.title.en-US.fl_str_mv The dispute between Newton and Leibniz: Calculus
dc.title.es-ES.fl_str_mv La diatriba entre Newton y Leibniz: el cálculo
title The dispute between Newton and Leibniz: Calculus
spellingShingle The dispute between Newton and Leibniz: Calculus
Cálculo integral
Cálculo diferencial
Historia de la ciencia
History of science
Differential calculus
Integral calculus
title_short The dispute between Newton and Leibniz: Calculus
title_full The dispute between Newton and Leibniz: Calculus
title_fullStr The dispute between Newton and Leibniz: Calculus
title_full_unstemmed The dispute between Newton and Leibniz: Calculus
title_sort The dispute between Newton and Leibniz: Calculus
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv Cálculo integral
Cálculo diferencial
Historia de la ciencia
topic Cálculo integral
Cálculo diferencial
Historia de la ciencia
History of science
Differential calculus
Integral calculus
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv History of science
Differential calculus
Integral calculus
description Professor Miguel Mendez offers a brief historical review of the dispute between Newton and Leibniz over authorship and priority in the creation of the Calculus. The controversy began in 1711 when John Keill, a follower of Newton, accused Leibniz of plagiarism in an article. Leibniz responded, claiming that he was unaware of Newton's method of fluxions when he wrote his papers. The Royal Society appointed a committee that issued a verdict in favor of Newton, without giving Leibniz an opportunity to defend himself. The dispute was continued in pamphlets and correspondence, even after Leibniz's death.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2024-10-10T02:55:28Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2024-10-10T02:55:28Z
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-01-18
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uan.edu.co/index.php/saywa/article/view/1825
10.54104/saywa.v5n6.1825
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/11160
url https://revistas.uan.edu.co/index.php/saywa/article/view/1825
https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/11160
identifier_str_mv 10.54104/saywa.v5n6.1825
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uan.edu.co/index.php/saywa/article/view/1825/1410
dc.rights.es-ES.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2024 Miguel Ángel Méndez Pérez
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2024 Miguel Ángel Méndez Pérez
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv UNIVERSIDAD ANTONIO NARIÑO
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv REVISTA SAYWA; Vol. 5 Núm. 6 (2023); 49-52
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv 2744-8576
2711-1571
10.54104/saywa.v5n6
institution Universidad Antonio Nariño
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional UAN
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alertas.repositorio@uan.edu.co
_version_ 1814300426799939584

Publicaciones similares