Teaching Characteristics and Evaluation Learning in Basic Primary Education
This paper presents the theoretical review and partial results of a qualitative research relevant to a thesis, comparing the pedagogical characteristics and their assessment of students learning implemented in eight Educational Institutions in Bogotá (EI), from the perspective of school administrato...
- Autores:
-
Prado Delgado, Víctor Manuel
Medina Rivilla, Antonio
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2014
- Institución:
- Universidad Antonio Nariño
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio UAN
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.uan.edu.co:123456789/5226
- Acceso en línea:
- http://revistas.uan.edu.co/index.php/papeles/article/view/229
http://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/5226
- Palabra clave:
- learning
evaluation
education systems
teaching methods
assessment
basic education
primary education
Evaluación de aprendizajes
sistemas de enseñanza
evaluación
educación básica
enseñanza primaria
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
Summary: | This paper presents the theoretical review and partial results of a qualitative research relevant to a thesis, comparing the pedagogical characteristics and their assessment of students learning implemented in eight Educational Institutions in Bogotá (EI), from the perspective of school administrators and teachers. It is a case study; the EI are differentiated by their performance (minimum and insufficient vs. satisfactory and advanced) on tests Saber 3 and 5. The methodology contemplated content analysis procedures such as coding, open and descriptive categorization of information collected in interviews and focus groups subsequently systematized with support from Atlas TI software. The results suggest tangential differences between pedagogical features such as learning explored the theoretical principles that guide teaching and learning, assessment and design of their distinction between evaluations is done in the classroom versus the ideal considered by the participants. The characteristics of the learning could not explain the results in evaluations Saber 3 and 5. |
---|