Estudio de caso – riesgo geológico. diseño y construcción del túnel de sumapaz
Between years 2006 to 2011, was realized the construction of the tunnel of the Sumapaz, located in the route that leads from Bogota to Girardot, builds singular of the contract of concession of third generation GG-040-2004, celebrated between the National Institute of Routes and the Society Concessi...
- Autores:
-
Camacho Salas, Alfredo
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2018
- Institución:
- Universidad Santo Tomás
- Repositorio:
- Universidad Santo Tomás
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/15821
- Palabra clave:
- Concession
Risk
Geologic Risk
Tunnel
Concesión
Riesgo
Riesgo Geológico
Túnel
Concessão chave
Risco
Risco Geológico
Túnel
- Rights
- License
- Derechos de autor 2019 Ingenio Magno
id |
SantoToma2_de956e7b7ed618e8963d11b712898774 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/15821 |
network_acronym_str |
SantoToma2 |
network_name_str |
Universidad Santo Tomás |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Estudio de caso – riesgo geológico. diseño y construcción del túnel de sumapaz |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Case study – geologic risk. design and construction of the sumapaz tunnel |
dc.title.alternative.por.fl_str_mv |
Estudo de cas – risco geológico. concepção e construção do túnel de sumapaz |
title |
Estudio de caso – riesgo geológico. diseño y construcción del túnel de sumapaz |
spellingShingle |
Estudio de caso – riesgo geológico. diseño y construcción del túnel de sumapaz Concession Risk Geologic Risk Tunnel Concesión Riesgo Riesgo Geológico Túnel Concessão chave Risco Risco Geológico Túnel |
title_short |
Estudio de caso – riesgo geológico. diseño y construcción del túnel de sumapaz |
title_full |
Estudio de caso – riesgo geológico. diseño y construcción del túnel de sumapaz |
title_fullStr |
Estudio de caso – riesgo geológico. diseño y construcción del túnel de sumapaz |
title_full_unstemmed |
Estudio de caso – riesgo geológico. diseño y construcción del túnel de sumapaz |
title_sort |
Estudio de caso – riesgo geológico. diseño y construcción del túnel de sumapaz |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Camacho Salas, Alfredo |
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv |
Camacho Salas, Alfredo |
dc.subject.proposal.eng.fl_str_mv |
Concession Risk Geologic Risk Tunnel |
topic |
Concession Risk Geologic Risk Tunnel Concesión Riesgo Riesgo Geológico Túnel Concessão chave Risco Risco Geológico Túnel |
dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Concesión Riesgo Riesgo Geológico Túnel |
dc.subject.proposal.por.fl_str_mv |
Concessão chave Risco Risco Geológico Túnel |
description |
Between years 2006 to 2011, was realized the construction of the tunnel of the Sumapaz, located in the route that leads from Bogota to Girardot, builds singular of the contract of concession of third generation GG-040-2004, celebrated between the National Institute of Routes and the Society Concession freeway Bogotá Girardot S.A. The designs for the structuring of the project the company INGETEC S.A. realized them – BATEMAN INGENIERÍA Ltda. – PIV INGENIERÍA Ltda., establishing the amounts of work to execute, from which 10% of the majors were determined like risk geologic in charge of the concessionaire executed amounts and surpassed this top the recognition by extra charges on the part of the State. The concessionaire in agreement with the contractual power, contracted the nal design of the tunnel with the company PONCE DE LEÓN y CONSULTING ENGINEER ASOCIADOS S.A. – PL&A, with which the work was executed. The State through the National Infrastructure Agency, recognized and paid to the concessionaire the approximated sum of fifty-five billions of additional pesos, despite having counted with the designs of INGETEC and a margin of the ten percent (10%) in the established amounts of work like geologic risk in charge of the concessionaire. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.issued.spa.fl_str_mv |
2018-01-02 |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
dc.type.drive.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.identifier.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.ustatunja.edu.co/index.php/ingeniomagno/article/view/1650 |
url |
http://revistas.ustatunja.edu.co/index.php/ingeniomagno/article/view/1650 |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.ustatunja.edu.co/index.php/ingeniomagno/article/view/1650/1492 |
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv |
Ingenio Magno; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2018): Ingenio Magno vol. 9-1; 136-148 2422-2399 2145-9282 |
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2019 Ingenio Magno |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2019 Ingenio Magno http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Santo Tomás Seccional Tunja |
institution |
Universidad Santo Tomás |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Universidad Santo Tomás |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
noreply@usta.edu.co |
_version_ |
1800786410353983488 |
spelling |
Camacho Salas, Alfredo2018-01-02http://revistas.ustatunja.edu.co/index.php/ingeniomagno/article/view/1650Between years 2006 to 2011, was realized the construction of the tunnel of the Sumapaz, located in the route that leads from Bogota to Girardot, builds singular of the contract of concession of third generation GG-040-2004, celebrated between the National Institute of Routes and the Society Concession freeway Bogotá Girardot S.A. The designs for the structuring of the project the company INGETEC S.A. realized them – BATEMAN INGENIERÍA Ltda. – PIV INGENIERÍA Ltda., establishing the amounts of work to execute, from which 10% of the majors were determined like risk geologic in charge of the concessionaire executed amounts and surpassed this top the recognition by extra charges on the part of the State. The concessionaire in agreement with the contractual power, contracted the nal design of the tunnel with the company PONCE DE LEÓN y CONSULTING ENGINEER ASOCIADOS S.A. – PL&A, with which the work was executed. The State through the National Infrastructure Agency, recognized and paid to the concessionaire the approximated sum of fifty-five billions of additional pesos, despite having counted with the designs of INGETEC and a margin of the ten percent (10%) in the established amounts of work like geologic risk in charge of the concessionaire.Entre los años 2006 a 2011, se realizó la construcción del túnel del Sumapaz, localizado en la vía que conduce de Bogotá a Girardot, obra singular del contrato de concesión de tercera generación GG-0402004, celebrado entre el Instituto Nacional de Vías y la Sociedad Concesión Autopista Bogotá Girardot S.A. Los diseños para la estructuración del proyecto los realizó la firma INGETEC S.A. – BATEMAN INGENIERÍA LTDA. – PIV INGENIERÍA LTDA, estableciendo las cantidades de obra a ejecutar, a partir de las cuales se determinó como riesgo geológico a cargo del concesionario el 10% de las mayores cantidades ejecutadas y superado este tope el reconocimiento por sobrecostos por parte del Estado. El concesionario de acuerdo con la potestad contractual, contrató el diseño final del túnel con la firma PONCE DE LEÓN y ASOCIADOS S.A. INGENIEROS CONSULTORES – PL&A, con los que se ejecutó la obra. El Estado a través de la Agencia Nacional de Infraestructura, reconoció y pagó al concesionario la suma aproximada de cincuenta y cinco mil millones de pesos adicionales, no obstante haber contado con los diseños de INGETEC y un margen del diez por ciento (10%) en las cantidades de obra establecidas como riesgo geológico a cargo del concesionario.Entre os anos 2006 à 2011, efetuou-se a construção do túnel do Sumapaz, situado na via que conduz de Bogotá Girardot, obra singular do contrato de concessão de terceira geração GG-040-2004, tida entre o Instituto Nacional Vias e da Sociedade Concessão Autoestrada Bogotá Girardot S.A. As concepções para a estruturação do projeto foi efetuadas pela assinatura INGETEC S.A – BATEMAN ENGENHARIA LTDA. – PIB ENGENHARIA LTDA, estabelecendo as quantidades de obra a executar, partir das quais determinou-se como risco geológico à carga do concessionário 10% mais das grandes quantidades executadas e excedido este limite o reconhecimento por custos adicionais pelo Estado. O concessionário de acordo com o poder contratual, contratou a concepção final do túnel com a assinatura PEDRA-POMES LEON e de ASSOCIADOS S.Aos ENGENHEIROS CONSULTOR – PL&A, com os que foram executados a obra. O Estado por meio da Agência Nacional de Infraestrutura, reconheceu e pagou ao concessionário a soma aproximativa de cinquenta e cinco mil milhões de pesos adicionais, não obstante ter disposto com as concepções INGETEC e de uma margem de dez para - cem (10%) nas quantidades de obra estabelecidas como risco geológico à carga da concessão naire.application/pdfspaUniversidad Santo Tomás Seccional Tunjahttp://revistas.ustatunja.edu.co/index.php/ingeniomagno/article/view/1650/1492Ingenio Magno; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2018): Ingenio Magno vol. 9-1; 136-1482422-23992145-9282Derechos de autor 2019 Ingenio Magnohttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Estudio de caso – riesgo geológico. diseño y construcción del túnel de sumapazCase study – geologic risk. design and construction of the sumapaz tunnelEstudo de cas – risco geológico. concepção e construção do túnel de sumapazinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1ConcessionRiskGeologic RiskTunnelConcesiónRiesgoRiesgo GeológicoTúnelConcessão chaveRiscoRisco GeológicoTúnel11634/15821oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/158212023-07-14 16:37:42.558metadata only accessRepositorio Universidad Santo Tomásnoreply@usta.edu.co |