Dosis personal y el derecho del libre desarrollo de la personalidad (consumidores vs no consumidores)

In the present article on the personal dose and the right of the free development of the personality (consumers vs. non-consumers), (case report), relevant aspects of the beginnings of drug trafficking up to the present are taken up again. In the same sense, it highlights the parallel regulations of...

Full description

Autores:
Cáceres Márquez, Alejandra
Mejía Niño, Ana Milena
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2020
Institución:
Universidad Santo Tomás
Repositorio:
Universidad Santo Tomás
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/29611
Acceso en línea:
http://revistas.ustatunja.edu.co/index.php/piuris/article/view/1946
http://hdl.handle.net/11634/29611
Palabra clave:
Dependency
rights
education
politics
prevention
repression
Dependencia
derechos
educación
política
prevención
represión
Rights
License
Derechos de autor 2020 Principia Iuris
id SantoToma2_dda65ffb9543b19ecded9b94754cb29a
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/29611
network_acronym_str SantoToma2
network_name_str Universidad Santo Tomás
repository_id_str
spelling Cáceres Márquez, AlejandraMejía Niño, Ana Milena2020-09-07T17:43:17Z2020-09-07T17:43:17Z2020-07-08http://revistas.ustatunja.edu.co/index.php/piuris/article/view/1946http://hdl.handle.net/11634/29611In the present article on the personal dose and the right of the free development of the personality (consumers vs. non-consumers), (case report), relevant aspects of the beginnings of drug trafficking up to the present are taken up again. In the same sense, it highlights the parallel regulations of these against the sinister criminal phenomenon, which highlights the State's effort to address this scourge, which instead of decreasing has mutated in its breadth and depth, mimicking society and the economy, although not in a generalized way, repressing those who consume the minimum dose, while the big bosses continue to strengthen their domes. Finally, the judgments of two jurisprudences of the Constitutional Court (C-221/94 and C-253/19) are confronted, which generate uncertainty, without carrying out an in-depth analysis, on the part of scholars in the field and of those who do not they are. It is concluded that the treatment given to drug users by the State, has been repressive equating them with the criminals who are dedicated to this unfortunate business, because it lacks a comprehensive public health policy that gives them the attention they deserve with the accompaniment of the family, of the society and the support of the State, in such a way, that the minors are educated, their parents in the prevention and risks generated by drug addiction.En el presente artículo sobre la dosis personal y el derecho del libre desarrollo de la personalidad (consumidores vs no consumidores), (reporte de caso), se retoman aspectos relevantes de los inicios del narcotráfico hasta la actualidad. En el mismo sentido, se resalta la normatividad paralela de estos frente al siniestro fenómeno criminal, donde se destaca el esfuerzo del Estado para enfrentar este flagelo, el cual en vez de disminuirse ha mutado en su anchura y profundidad, mimetizándose en la sociedad y en la economía, aunque no de forma generalizada reprimiendo a quien consume la dosis mínima, mientras que los grandes capos siguen fortaleciendo sus cúpulas. Por último, se confrontan los fallos de dos jurisprudencias de la Corte Constitucional (C-221/94 y C-253/19), que generan incertidumbre, sin realizar un análisis de fondo, por parte de eruditos en la materia y de quienes no lo son. Se concluye, que el tratamiento dado a los consumidores de drogas por parte del Estado, ha sido represivo equiparándolos con los criminales que se dedican a éste funesto negocio, porque se carece de una política pública de salud integral que les brinde la atención que se merecen con el acompañamiento de la familia, de la sociedad y el apoyo del Estado, de tal manera, que se eduque a los menores, a sus padres en la prevención y riesgos que genera la drogadicción.application/pdfspaUniversidad Santo Tomas de Aquino Seccional Tunjahttp://revistas.ustatunja.edu.co/index.php/piuris/article/view/1946/1719Principia Iuris; Vol. 16 Núm. 34 (2019); 143-1690124-2067Derechos de autor 2020 Principia Iurishttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Dosis personal y el derecho del libre desarrollo de la personalidad (consumidores vs no consumidores)Personal dose and the right to free personality development (consumers vs non-consumers)Le dosage personnel et le droit au libre développement de la personnalité (consommateurs contre non-consommateurs)Dosagem pessoal e o direito ao livre desenvolvimento da personalidade (consumidores vs. Não-consumidores)info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1DependencyrightseducationpoliticspreventionrepressionDependenciaderechoseducaciónpolíticaprevenciónrepresión11634/29611oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/296112023-07-14 16:27:54.572metadata only accessRepositorio Universidad Santo Tomásnoreply@usta.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Dosis personal y el derecho del libre desarrollo de la personalidad (consumidores vs no consumidores)
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Personal dose and the right to free personality development (consumers vs non-consumers)
dc.title.alternative.fra.fl_str_mv Le dosage personnel et le droit au libre développement de la personnalité (consommateurs contre non-consommateurs)
dc.title.alternative.por.fl_str_mv Dosagem pessoal e o direito ao livre desenvolvimento da personalidade (consumidores vs. Não-consumidores)
title Dosis personal y el derecho del libre desarrollo de la personalidad (consumidores vs no consumidores)
spellingShingle Dosis personal y el derecho del libre desarrollo de la personalidad (consumidores vs no consumidores)
Dependency
rights
education
politics
prevention
repression
Dependencia
derechos
educación
política
prevención
represión
title_short Dosis personal y el derecho del libre desarrollo de la personalidad (consumidores vs no consumidores)
title_full Dosis personal y el derecho del libre desarrollo de la personalidad (consumidores vs no consumidores)
title_fullStr Dosis personal y el derecho del libre desarrollo de la personalidad (consumidores vs no consumidores)
title_full_unstemmed Dosis personal y el derecho del libre desarrollo de la personalidad (consumidores vs no consumidores)
title_sort Dosis personal y el derecho del libre desarrollo de la personalidad (consumidores vs no consumidores)
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Cáceres Márquez, Alejandra
Mejía Niño, Ana Milena
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Cáceres Márquez, Alejandra
Mejía Niño, Ana Milena
dc.subject.proposal.eng.fl_str_mv Dependency
rights
education
politics
prevention
repression
topic Dependency
rights
education
politics
prevention
repression
Dependencia
derechos
educación
política
prevención
represión
dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv Dependencia
derechos
educación
política
prevención
represión
description In the present article on the personal dose and the right of the free development of the personality (consumers vs. non-consumers), (case report), relevant aspects of the beginnings of drug trafficking up to the present are taken up again. In the same sense, it highlights the parallel regulations of these against the sinister criminal phenomenon, which highlights the State's effort to address this scourge, which instead of decreasing has mutated in its breadth and depth, mimicking society and the economy, although not in a generalized way, repressing those who consume the minimum dose, while the big bosses continue to strengthen their domes. Finally, the judgments of two jurisprudences of the Constitutional Court (C-221/94 and C-253/19) are confronted, which generate uncertainty, without carrying out an in-depth analysis, on the part of scholars in the field and of those who do not they are. It is concluded that the treatment given to drug users by the State, has been repressive equating them with the criminals who are dedicated to this unfortunate business, because it lacks a comprehensive public health policy that gives them the attention they deserve with the accompaniment of the family, of the society and the support of the State, in such a way, that the minors are educated, their parents in the prevention and risks generated by drug addiction.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.accessioned.spa.fl_str_mv 2020-09-07T17:43:17Z
dc.date.available.spa.fl_str_mv 2020-09-07T17:43:17Z
dc.date.issued.spa.fl_str_mv 2020-07-08
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.drive.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.spa.fl_str_mv http://revistas.ustatunja.edu.co/index.php/piuris/article/view/1946
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11634/29611
url http://revistas.ustatunja.edu.co/index.php/piuris/article/view/1946
http://hdl.handle.net/11634/29611
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.spa.fl_str_mv http://revistas.ustatunja.edu.co/index.php/piuris/article/view/1946/1719
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv Principia Iuris; Vol. 16 Núm. 34 (2019); 143-169
0124-2067
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2020 Principia Iuris
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2020 Principia Iuris
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Santo Tomas de Aquino Seccional Tunja
institution Universidad Santo Tomás
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Universidad Santo Tomás
repository.mail.fl_str_mv noreply@usta.edu.co
_version_ 1800786340667719680