Juicio moral de la conducta agresiva en competencia: un análisis en futbolistas universitarios

The purpose of this study was to examine the acceptability of aggressive response in competition in a group of 192 university soccer players in Bogotá (men = 141 and women = 51) from the Information Integration Theory. A questionnaire with 24 scenarios was designed and applied combining the variable...

Full description

Autores:
Rodríguez Castellanos, Fredy Alexander
Pineda Marín, Claudia Patricia
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2021
Institución:
Universidad Santo Tomás
Repositorio:
Universidad Santo Tomás
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/40081
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/rccm/article/view/6467
http://hdl.handle.net/11634/40081
Palabra clave:
moral judgment
sport psychology
moral science
aggression in soccer
juicio moral
psicología deportiva
ciencia moral
agresión en fútbol
Rights
License
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Description
Summary:The purpose of this study was to examine the acceptability of aggressive response in competition in a group of 192 university soccer players in Bogotá (men = 141 and women = 51) from the Information Integration Theory. A questionnaire with 24 scenarios was designed and applied combining the variables: importance of the game, previous aggression, and type of aggressive response. The results show the differences with respect to moral judgment of this behavior in four clusters from a k-means analysis and ANOVA. Differences were identified according to gender (T = 3.37, p < 0.002) and positions on the playing field (F = 2.83, p <0.05; ƞ²ρ = 0.44); however, the importance of the disputed game was not found to be context for the acceptability of aggression in any cluster. Finally, we discuss possible explanations of the failure of algebraic laws for the study of moral judgment in this research and make suggestions for improving studies on moral judgment in sports.