No hay mano invisible

2001 Nobel Prize laurate, Joseph Stiglitz comments the approaches on experimental economy made by the 2002 laurates, Daniel Kahneman and Vernon Smith. The two academics argue that the economic actors do not behave as rationally as traditional economics believed. This leds to a critique of traditiona...

Full description

Autores:
Stiglitz, Joseph
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2020
Institución:
Universidad Santo Tomás
Repositorio:
Universidad Santo Tomás
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/41640
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/episteme/article/view/6574
http://hdl.handle.net/11634/41640
Palabra clave:
Nobel
Economy
Market
Invisible hand
Rational expectations
Nobel
economía
Mercado
mano invisible
expectativas racionales
Nobel,
Economia
Mercado
mão invisível
expectativas racionais
Rights
License
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
id SantoToma2_bc7af6f07d781f7e6b9de026127c4bc6
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/41640
network_acronym_str SantoToma2
network_name_str Universidad Santo Tomás
repository_id_str
spelling Stiglitz, Joseph2022-01-18T20:44:52Z2022-01-18T20:44:52Z2020-11-03https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/episteme/article/view/6574http://hdl.handle.net/11634/416402001 Nobel Prize laurate, Joseph Stiglitz comments the approaches on experimental economy made by the 2002 laurates, Daniel Kahneman and Vernon Smith. The two academics argue that the economic actors do not behave as rationally as traditional economics believed. This leds to a critique of traditional market economy, specially its idea of a self-regulated market, as stated by Adam Smith and his idea of an “Invisible hand”. Thus, this gives room to an economy not based on ideal models, as that of rational expectations, but on the experimental study of economics as they are, and not as they should be.El premio Nobel de Economía de 2001, Joseph Stiglitz, comenta los planteamientos de economía experimental de Daniel Kahneman y Vernon Smith, galardonados con dicho premio en el año 2002. Estos dos estudiosos plantean que los actores de la economía no se comportan de una forma tan racional como tradicionalmente se creía. Esto da pie para realizar una crítica a la teoría tradicional de la economía de mercado, especialmente la idea de un mercado que se regula a sí mismo, como lo planteó Adam Smith con su “mano invisible”. De esta forma, se da espacio a una economía que no se basa en modelos ideales, como el de expectativas racionales, sino en un estudio experimental de las economías como son y no como deberían ser.O ganhador do Prêmio Nobel de Economia em 2001, Joseph Stiglitz, comenta as abordagens da economia experimental de Daniel Kahneman e Vernon Smith, que receberam o prêmio em 2002. Estes dois estudiosos argumentam que os atores da economia não se comportam de uma forma tão racional como tradicionalmente acredita-se. Daí surge uma crítica à teoria tradicional da economia de mercado, especialmente à ideia de um mercado que se regula a si próprio, tal como foi defendido por Adam Smith com a sua “mão invisível”. Desse modo, é dado o espaço a uma economia que não se baseia em modelos ideais, como aquele de expectativas racionais, mas em um estudo experimental das economias como são e não como deveriam ser.application/pdfspaUniversidad Santo Tomás Villavicenciohttps://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/episteme/article/view/6574/6177Episteme; Vol. 11 No. 2 (2019): Episteme; 185-188Revista Episteme; Vol. 11 Núm. 2 (2019): Episteme; 185-1882711-38332027-7504No hay mano invisibleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1NobelEconomyMarketInvisible handRational expectationsNobeleconomíaMercadomano invisibleexpectativas racionalesNobel,EconomiaMercadomão invisívelexpectativas racionaishttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf211634/41640oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/416402023-07-14 15:31:04.821metadata only accessRepositorio Universidad Santo Tomásnoreply@usta.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv No hay mano invisible
title No hay mano invisible
spellingShingle No hay mano invisible
Nobel
Economy
Market
Invisible hand
Rational expectations
Nobel
economía
Mercado
mano invisible
expectativas racionales
Nobel,
Economia
Mercado
mão invisível
expectativas racionais
title_short No hay mano invisible
title_full No hay mano invisible
title_fullStr No hay mano invisible
title_full_unstemmed No hay mano invisible
title_sort No hay mano invisible
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Stiglitz, Joseph
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Stiglitz, Joseph
dc.subject.proposal.eng.fl_str_mv Nobel
Economy
Market
Invisible hand
Rational expectations
topic Nobel
Economy
Market
Invisible hand
Rational expectations
Nobel
economía
Mercado
mano invisible
expectativas racionales
Nobel,
Economia
Mercado
mão invisível
expectativas racionais
dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv Nobel
economía
Mercado
mano invisible
expectativas racionales
dc.subject.proposal.por.fl_str_mv Nobel,
Economia
Mercado
mão invisível
expectativas racionais
description 2001 Nobel Prize laurate, Joseph Stiglitz comments the approaches on experimental economy made by the 2002 laurates, Daniel Kahneman and Vernon Smith. The two academics argue that the economic actors do not behave as rationally as traditional economics believed. This leds to a critique of traditional market economy, specially its idea of a self-regulated market, as stated by Adam Smith and his idea of an “Invisible hand”. Thus, this gives room to an economy not based on ideal models, as that of rational expectations, but on the experimental study of economics as they are, and not as they should be.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2020-11-03
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-18T20:44:52Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-18T20:44:52Z
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.drive.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/episteme/article/view/6574
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11634/41640
url https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/episteme/article/view/6574
http://hdl.handle.net/11634/41640
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/episteme/article/view/6574/6177
dc.relation.citationissue.eng.fl_str_mv Episteme; Vol. 11 No. 2 (2019): Episteme; 185-188
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv Revista Episteme; Vol. 11 Núm. 2 (2019): Episteme; 185-188
dc.relation.citationissue.none.fl_str_mv 2711-3833
2027-7504
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Santo Tomás Villavicencio
institution Universidad Santo Tomás
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Universidad Santo Tomás
repository.mail.fl_str_mv noreply@usta.edu.co
_version_ 1800786320813981696

Publicaciones similares