La hipnosis y la subjetividad: Reflexiones sobre la ciencia moderna y Psicología
The present article calls for a critical and epistemological reconsideration of hypnosis and its relation with the science of modern psychology. In that sense, it searches for a two-way discussion, which brings up various contradictions present in the upbringing of such science in modern aspects. Fi...
- Autores:
-
Neubern, Mauricio S.
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2009
- Institución:
- Universidad Santo Tomás
- Repositorio:
- Universidad Santo Tomás
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/40202
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/diversitas/article/view/171
http://hdl.handle.net/11634/40202
- Palabra clave:
- epistemology
subjectivity
psychology
hypnosis
modern science
epistemología
subjetividad
psicología
hipnosis
ciencia moderna
- Rights
- License
- http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
id |
SantoToma2_620af19bae145c3c5184422b7056c38c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/40202 |
network_acronym_str |
SantoToma2 |
network_name_str |
Universidad Santo Tomás |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
La hipnosis y la subjetividad: Reflexiones sobre la ciencia moderna y Psicología |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Hypnosis and subjectivity: Thinking about modern science and Psychology |
dc.title.alternative.por.fl_str_mv |
Hipnose e Subjetividade: Reflexões Sobre a Ciência Moderna e a Psicologia |
title |
La hipnosis y la subjetividad: Reflexiones sobre la ciencia moderna y Psicología |
spellingShingle |
La hipnosis y la subjetividad: Reflexiones sobre la ciencia moderna y Psicología epistemology subjectivity psychology hypnosis modern science epistemología subjetividad psicología hipnosis ciencia moderna |
title_short |
La hipnosis y la subjetividad: Reflexiones sobre la ciencia moderna y Psicología |
title_full |
La hipnosis y la subjetividad: Reflexiones sobre la ciencia moderna y Psicología |
title_fullStr |
La hipnosis y la subjetividad: Reflexiones sobre la ciencia moderna y Psicología |
title_full_unstemmed |
La hipnosis y la subjetividad: Reflexiones sobre la ciencia moderna y Psicología |
title_sort |
La hipnosis y la subjetividad: Reflexiones sobre la ciencia moderna y Psicología |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Neubern, Mauricio S. |
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Neubern, Mauricio S. |
dc.subject.proposal.eng.fl_str_mv |
epistemology subjectivity psychology hypnosis modern science |
topic |
epistemology subjectivity psychology hypnosis modern science epistemología subjetividad psicología hipnosis ciencia moderna |
dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv |
epistemología subjetividad psicología hipnosis ciencia moderna |
description |
The present article calls for a critical and epistemological reconsideration of hypnosis and its relation with the science of modern psychology. In that sense, it searches for a two-way discussion, which brings up various contradictions present in the upbringing of such science in modern aspects. First of all, this article highlights the difficulties in putting together clinic and science; in addition, it suggests that the views over hypnosis might as well be applicable, in a general approach, to clinic psychology, which in turn supposes that those thoughts brought by hypnosis are still of considerable pertinence to such association - clinic and science. Second, this article also states that the institutions involved in the formation of psychology did have a crucial role in determining a distorted view not only over hypnosis but also of what could or could not be considered scientific. The present article finally proposes that, although the study of hypnosis does not show a whole array of answers in the modern sense, it still is rather pertinent when it comes to bringing important questions concerning the building of such a science. Some of these questions relate to historical deformations brought about by institutional processes and the scientific aspect of clinic practice. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-06-21 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-18T16:46:14Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-18T16:46:14Z |
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo revisado por pares |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
dc.type.drive.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/diversitas/article/view/171 10.15332/s1794-9998.2009.0002.07 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11634/40202 |
url |
https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/diversitas/article/view/171 http://hdl.handle.net/11634/40202 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15332/s1794-9998.2009.0002.07 |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/diversitas/article/view/171/261 https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/diversitas/article/view/171/262 |
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv |
Diversitas; Vol. 5 Núm. 2 (2009); 307-319 |
dc.relation.citationissue.eng.fl_str_mv |
Diversitas; Vol. 5 No. 2 (2009); 307-319 |
dc.relation.citationissue.none.fl_str_mv |
2256-3067 1794-9998 |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Santo Tomás, Bogotá, Colombia |
institution |
Universidad Santo Tomás |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Universidad Santo Tomás |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
noreply@usta.edu.co |
_version_ |
1800786363530870784 |
spelling |
Neubern, Mauricio S.2022-01-18T16:46:14Z2022-01-18T16:46:14Z2009-06-21https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/diversitas/article/view/17110.15332/s1794-9998.2009.0002.07http://hdl.handle.net/11634/40202The present article calls for a critical and epistemological reconsideration of hypnosis and its relation with the science of modern psychology. In that sense, it searches for a two-way discussion, which brings up various contradictions present in the upbringing of such science in modern aspects. First of all, this article highlights the difficulties in putting together clinic and science; in addition, it suggests that the views over hypnosis might as well be applicable, in a general approach, to clinic psychology, which in turn supposes that those thoughts brought by hypnosis are still of considerable pertinence to such association - clinic and science. Second, this article also states that the institutions involved in the formation of psychology did have a crucial role in determining a distorted view not only over hypnosis but also of what could or could not be considered scientific. The present article finally proposes that, although the study of hypnosis does not show a whole array of answers in the modern sense, it still is rather pertinent when it comes to bringing important questions concerning the building of such a science. Some of these questions relate to historical deformations brought about by institutional processes and the scientific aspect of clinic practice.El presente artículo invita a una reconsideración crítica y epistemológica de la hipnosis y su relación con la ciencia de la Psicología moderna. En este sentido, busca una discusión de dos vías que trae a colación varias contradicciones presentes en la invocación de esta ciencia en los aspectos modernos. Primero, el artículo enfatiza las dificultades de unir clínica y ciencia; adicionalmente sugiere que las visiones de la hipnosis pueden ser aplicables también, de forma general, a la psicología clínica, que a su vez supone que los pensamientos evocados por la hipnosis todavía tienen una pertinencia considerable para esta asociación, clínica y ciencia. Segundo, el artículo también postula que las instituciones involucradas en la formación de la Psicología tuvieron un papel crucial en la determinación de una visión distorsionada no sólo de la hipnosis sino de lo que podría o no considerarse científico. Finalmente, el artículo propone que aunque el estudio de la hipnosis no muestra una gran cantidad de respuestas en el sentido moderno, todavía es pertinente al invocar preguntas importantes sobre la construcción de dicha ciencia. Algunas de estas preguntas están relacionadas con las deformaciones históricas hechas por los procesos institucionales y por el aspecto científico de la práctica clínica.O presente artigo propõe uma releitura crítica e epistemológica da hipnose em suas relações com o projeto de ciência da psicologia moderna. Para tanto, busca uma discussão em dois sentidos que destaca diversas contradições presentes na construção dessa ciência nos moldes modernos. Em primeiro lugar, destaca as dificuldades em associar clínica e ciência, destacando, sobretudo, que as críticas efetivadas à hipnose também são aplicáveis às psicologia clínica de um modo geral, o que pressupõe que os problemas trazidos pela hipnose ainda são de considerável pertinência para tal associação. Em segundo lugar, ressalta que as instituições presentes na construção da psicologia possuíram um papel crucial na determinação de uma visão pejorativa sobre a hipnose, como também sobre o que poderia ou não ser considerado científico. O artigo é finalizado propondo que, embora o estudo da hipnose não permita oferecer muitas respostas no sentido moderno, ele ainda é bastante pertinente por trazer perguntas de grande relevância sobre a construção dessa ciência, como as referentes às deformações históricas promovidas por processos institucionais e cientificidade da prática clínica. Palavras-chave: epistemologia, subjetividade, psicologia, hipnose, ciência moderna.application/pdftext/htmlspaUniversidad Santo Tomás, Bogotá, Colombiahttps://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/diversitas/article/view/171/261https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/diversitas/article/view/171/262Diversitas; Vol. 5 Núm. 2 (2009); 307-319Diversitas; Vol. 5 No. 2 (2009); 307-3192256-30671794-9998La hipnosis y la subjetividad: Reflexiones sobre la ciencia moderna y PsicologíaHypnosis and subjectivity: Thinking about modern science and PsychologyHipnose e Subjetividade: Reflexões Sobre a Ciência Moderna e a PsicologiaArtículo revisado por paresinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1epistemologysubjectivitypsychologyhypnosismodern scienceepistemologíasubjetividadpsicologíahipnosisciencia modernahttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf211634/40202oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/402022023-07-14 16:01:47.901metadata only accessRepositorio Universidad Santo Tomásnoreply@usta.edu.co |