Criterios para implementar la medidade protección y prevención en el “nuevo”1Código Nacional de Policía
The National Police and Coexistence Code bill has been introduced by the nationalGovernment to Congress, and is scheduled for first reading in 2013. The outlineand delineation in the bill is considered insufficient as regards to the police measureto protect people under evident weakness and preventi...
- Autores:
-
MORENO GONZALEZ, FERNANDO
MORENO RAMIREZ, MARCO ANTONIO
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2013
- Institución:
- Universidad Santo Tomás
- Repositorio:
- Universidad Santo Tomás
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/40973
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/iusta/article/view/1093
http://hdl.handle.net/11634/40973
- Palabra clave:
- Keywords
National Police Code bill
police measure for protection of people
evident weakness
prevention of criminal behavior
Proyecto Código Nacional de Policía
medida policial para protección de personas
debilidad manifiesta
prevención de conductas delictuales.
- Rights
- License
- http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
id |
SantoToma2_4d79df6686f7b737568d379a1f3915d7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/40973 |
network_acronym_str |
SantoToma2 |
network_name_str |
Universidad Santo Tomás |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Criterios para implementar la medidade protección y prevención en el “nuevo”1Código Nacional de Policía |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Criteria to implement protective measures and prevention in the “new” National Police Code |
title |
Criterios para implementar la medidade protección y prevención en el “nuevo”1Código Nacional de Policía |
spellingShingle |
Criterios para implementar la medidade protección y prevención en el “nuevo”1Código Nacional de Policía Keywords National Police Code bill police measure for protection of people evident weakness prevention of criminal behavior Proyecto Código Nacional de Policía medida policial para protección de personas debilidad manifiesta prevención de conductas delictuales. |
title_short |
Criterios para implementar la medidade protección y prevención en el “nuevo”1Código Nacional de Policía |
title_full |
Criterios para implementar la medidade protección y prevención en el “nuevo”1Código Nacional de Policía |
title_fullStr |
Criterios para implementar la medidade protección y prevención en el “nuevo”1Código Nacional de Policía |
title_full_unstemmed |
Criterios para implementar la medidade protección y prevención en el “nuevo”1Código Nacional de Policía |
title_sort |
Criterios para implementar la medidade protección y prevención en el “nuevo”1Código Nacional de Policía |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
MORENO GONZALEZ, FERNANDO MORENO RAMIREZ, MARCO ANTONIO |
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
MORENO GONZALEZ, FERNANDO MORENO RAMIREZ, MARCO ANTONIO |
dc.subject.proposal.eng.fl_str_mv |
Keywords National Police Code bill police measure for protection of people evident weakness prevention of criminal behavior |
topic |
Keywords National Police Code bill police measure for protection of people evident weakness prevention of criminal behavior Proyecto Código Nacional de Policía medida policial para protección de personas debilidad manifiesta prevención de conductas delictuales. |
dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Proyecto Código Nacional de Policía medida policial para protección de personas debilidad manifiesta prevención de conductas delictuales. |
description |
The National Police and Coexistence Code bill has been introduced by the nationalGovernment to Congress, and is scheduled for first reading in 2013. The outlineand delineation in the bill is considered insufficient as regards to the police measureto protect people under evident weakness and prevention of criminal behavior byhighly aggressive people. It has the shortcomings and imperfections that, accordingto honorable Constitutional Court, has the measure designed in Decree-Law 1355of 1970. Obviously at that time it was justified, since, the issue was not settledas it is today. It is recalled that this measure, in the aforementioned decree, wascontained in four articles: the 186 (numeral 8), 192 (declared unconstitutional),the 207 (partially enforceable) and 219. In addition, two rulings were issued: theC-199 of 1998, which declared the measure in accordance to the Constitution,and the C-720 of 2007 which, with serious inconsistencies in the conclusions oflaw of the decision, only declared unconstitutional the article 192. A detailed legalanalysis of these two decisions and their confrontation with other legal rules andcourt decisions, especially the C-879, 2011, infer, without a doubt, that such police measure is in full force today. In the future, as a result of a detailed examination,a title on such measure will be proposed within the bill of the national police andcoexistence code.. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-07-30 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-18T19:32:07Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-18T19:32:07Z |
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo revisado por pares |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
dc.type.drive.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/iusta/article/view/1093 10.15332/s1900-0448.2013.0038.06 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11634/40973 |
url |
https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/iusta/article/view/1093 http://hdl.handle.net/11634/40973 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15332/s1900-0448.2013.0038.06 |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/iusta/article/view/1093/1328 |
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv |
IUSTA; Núm. 38 (2013) |
dc.relation.citationissue.eng.fl_str_mv |
IUSTA; No. 38 (2013) |
dc.relation.citationissue.none.fl_str_mv |
2500-5286 1900-0448 |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Santo Tomás, Bogotá-Colombia |
institution |
Universidad Santo Tomás |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Universidad Santo Tomás |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
noreply@usta.edu.co |
_version_ |
1800786357872754688 |
spelling |
MORENO GONZALEZ, FERNANDOMORENO RAMIREZ, MARCO ANTONIO2022-01-18T19:32:07Z2022-01-18T19:32:07Z2013-07-30https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/iusta/article/view/109310.15332/s1900-0448.2013.0038.06http://hdl.handle.net/11634/40973The National Police and Coexistence Code bill has been introduced by the nationalGovernment to Congress, and is scheduled for first reading in 2013. The outlineand delineation in the bill is considered insufficient as regards to the police measureto protect people under evident weakness and prevention of criminal behavior byhighly aggressive people. It has the shortcomings and imperfections that, accordingto honorable Constitutional Court, has the measure designed in Decree-Law 1355of 1970. Obviously at that time it was justified, since, the issue was not settledas it is today. It is recalled that this measure, in the aforementioned decree, wascontained in four articles: the 186 (numeral 8), 192 (declared unconstitutional),the 207 (partially enforceable) and 219. In addition, two rulings were issued: theC-199 of 1998, which declared the measure in accordance to the Constitution,and the C-720 of 2007 which, with serious inconsistencies in the conclusions oflaw of the decision, only declared unconstitutional the article 192. A detailed legalanalysis of these two decisions and their confrontation with other legal rules andcourt decisions, especially the C-879, 2011, infer, without a doubt, that such police measure is in full force today. In the future, as a result of a detailed examination,a title on such measure will be proposed within the bill of the national police andcoexistence code..ResumenEl Proyecto del Código Nacional de Policía y Convivencia ha sido radicado porel Gobierno Nacional en el Congreso, y se prevé su primer debate en el año 2013.Se considera insuficiente el esbozo y delineamiento, en el proyecto, de la medidapolicial para la protección de las personas en debilidad manifiesta y la prevención deconductas delictuales de personas en alto grado de agresividad. Tiene las carenciase imperfecciones que, según la honorable Corte Constitucional, posee la medidadiseñada en el Decreto-Ley 1355 de 1970. Obvio que en ese tiempo se justificaba, pues no se contaba con la decantación que el tema ahora tiene. Se recuerda queesta medida, en el mencionado decreto, se plasmó en cuatro artículos: el 186, numeral8; el 192 (declarado inexequible); el 207 (parcialmente exequible), y el 219.Además, se produjeron dos sentencias: la C-199 de 1998, que declaró conformea la Constitución la medida, y la C-720 de 2007 que, con serias incoherencias enlos fundamentos de la decisión, solo declaró inconstitucional el artículo 192. Unpormenorizado análisis jurídico de estas dos sentencias y su confrontación con otrasnormas jurídicas y sentencias, especialmente la C-879 de 2011, infiere, sin lugar adudas, que dicha medida policial hoy está plenamente vigente. Para el futuro, frutode un examen pormenorizado, se propondrá un título sobre tal medida, dentro delProyecto del Código Nacional de Policía y Convivencia.Palabras clave: Proyecto Código Nacional de Policía, medida policial para protecciónde personas, debilidad manifiesta, prevención de conductas delictuales.Criteria to implement protective measures andprevention in the “new” National Police CodeAbstract: The National Police and Coexistence Code bill has been introduced by the nationalGovernment to Congress, and is scheduled for first reading in 2013. The outlineand delineation in the bill is considered insufficient as regards to the police measureto protect people under evident weakness and prevention of criminal behavior byhighly aggressive people. It has the shortcomings and imperfections that, accordingto honorable Constitutional Court, has the measure designed in Decree-Law 1355of 1970. Obviously at that time it was justified, since, the issue was not settledas it is today. It is recalled that this measure, in the aforementioned decree, wascontained in four articles: the 186 (numeral 8), 192 (declared unconstitutional),the 207 (partially enforceable) and 219. In addition, two rulings were issued: theC-199 of 1998, which declared the measure in accordance to the Constitution,and the C-720 of 2007 which, with serious inconsistencies in the conclusions oflaw of the decision, only declared unconstitutional the article 192. A detailed legalanalysis of these two decisions and their confrontation with other legal rules andcourt decisions, especially the C-879, 2011, infer, without a doubt, that such police measure is in full force today. In the future, as a result of a detailed examination,a title on such measure will be proposed within the bill of the national police andcoexistence code.Keywords: National Police Code bill, police measure for protection of people,evident weakness, prevention of criminal behavior.Critérios para executar a medida de proteção eprevenção no “novo” Código Nacional de PolíciaResumo: O projeto do Código Nacional de Polícia e Convivência foi apresentado peloGoverno Nacional no Congresso, e prevê-se seu primeiro debatimento em 2013.Considera-se insuficiente o esquema e o delineamento no projeto, da medidapolicial para a proteção das pessoas com debilidade manifesta e a prevenção decomportamento criminoso de pessoas com alto grau de agressividade. Ele tem ascarências e imperfeições que, segundo a honrosa Corte Constitucional, possui amedida desenhada no Decreto-Lei 1.355 de 1970. Obviamente naquela época erajustificado, pois, não contavam com a decantação que o tema tem agora. Lembreseque esta medida, no decreto mencionado, está contida em quatro artigos: o186 (seção 8), o 192 (declarado inexequível), o 207 (parcialmente exequível) e o219. Além disso, houve duas sentencias: a C-199 de 1998, que declarou a medidaconforme à Constituição, e a C-720 de 2007 que, com inconsistências graves nosfundamentos da decisão, apenas declarou inconstitucional o artigo 192. Uma análisejurídica detalhada destas duas sentenças e seu confronto com outras normas jurídicase sentenças, especialmente a C-879, 2011, infere, sem dúvida nenhuma, que essamedida policial ainda hoje está em total vigor. No futuro, como resultado de umexame detalhado, será proposto um título sobre essa medida dentro do projeto docódigo nacional de polícia e de convivência.Palavras chave: projeto Código Nacional de Policia, medida policial para proteçãode pessoas, debilidade manifesta, prevenção de condutas criminosas. application/pdfspaUniversidad Santo Tomás, Bogotá-Colombiahttps://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/iusta/article/view/1093/1328IUSTA; Núm. 38 (2013)IUSTA; No. 38 (2013)2500-52861900-0448Criterios para implementar la medidade protección y prevención en el “nuevo”1Código Nacional de PolicíaCriteria to implement protective measures and prevention in the “new” National Police CodeArtículo revisado por paresinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1KeywordsNational Police Code billpolice measure for protection of peopleevident weaknessprevention of criminal behaviorProyecto Código Nacional de Policíamedida policial para protección de personasdebilidad manifiestaprevención de conductas delictuales.http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf211634/40973oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/409732023-07-14 16:09:31.135metadata only accessRepositorio Universidad Santo Tomásnoreply@usta.edu.co |