COMPARACIÓN DE LA RESISTENCIA AL DESALOJO DE POSTES PREFABRICADOS EN DIENTES UNIRADICULARES: UN ESTUDIO IN VITRO
Objective: To compare two cementing techniques in uniradicular teeth with root weakened walls.Methods: An in vitro experimental study was done with sixty collected teeth which were divided into three groups at random (A, B and C). The conventional technique with resin cement was done in 20 teeth wit...
- Autores:
-
Celis Corzo, Juliana Elisa
Cáceres Marulanda, Adriana
Cabrera Rojas, Juan Carlos
Díaz Rodríguez, Jorge Guillermo
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2013
- Institución:
- Universidad Santo Tomás
- Repositorio:
- Universidad Santo Tomás
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/36993
- Acceso en línea:
- http://revistas.ustabuca.edu.co/index.php/USTASALUD_ODONTOLOGIA/article/view/1116
http://hdl.handle.net/11634/36993
- Palabra clave:
- Rights
- License
- Derechos de autor 2018 UstaSalud
id |
SantoToma2_393cfae0de8fced6508c1d4afa15595f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/36993 |
network_acronym_str |
SantoToma2 |
network_name_str |
Universidad Santo Tomás |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
COMPARACIÓN DE LA RESISTENCIA AL DESALOJO DE POSTES PREFABRICADOS EN DIENTES UNIRADICULARES: UN ESTUDIO IN VITRO |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
COMPARISON OF RESISTANCE IN PRECAST POST EVICTION UNIRADICULAR TEETH: AN IN VITRO STUDY |
title |
COMPARACIÓN DE LA RESISTENCIA AL DESALOJO DE POSTES PREFABRICADOS EN DIENTES UNIRADICULARES: UN ESTUDIO IN VITRO |
spellingShingle |
COMPARACIÓN DE LA RESISTENCIA AL DESALOJO DE POSTES PREFABRICADOS EN DIENTES UNIRADICULARES: UN ESTUDIO IN VITRO |
title_short |
COMPARACIÓN DE LA RESISTENCIA AL DESALOJO DE POSTES PREFABRICADOS EN DIENTES UNIRADICULARES: UN ESTUDIO IN VITRO |
title_full |
COMPARACIÓN DE LA RESISTENCIA AL DESALOJO DE POSTES PREFABRICADOS EN DIENTES UNIRADICULARES: UN ESTUDIO IN VITRO |
title_fullStr |
COMPARACIÓN DE LA RESISTENCIA AL DESALOJO DE POSTES PREFABRICADOS EN DIENTES UNIRADICULARES: UN ESTUDIO IN VITRO |
title_full_unstemmed |
COMPARACIÓN DE LA RESISTENCIA AL DESALOJO DE POSTES PREFABRICADOS EN DIENTES UNIRADICULARES: UN ESTUDIO IN VITRO |
title_sort |
COMPARACIÓN DE LA RESISTENCIA AL DESALOJO DE POSTES PREFABRICADOS EN DIENTES UNIRADICULARES: UN ESTUDIO IN VITRO |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Celis Corzo, Juliana Elisa Cáceres Marulanda, Adriana Cabrera Rojas, Juan Carlos Díaz Rodríguez, Jorge Guillermo |
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Celis Corzo, Juliana Elisa Cáceres Marulanda, Adriana Cabrera Rojas, Juan Carlos Díaz Rodríguez, Jorge Guillermo |
description |
Objective: To compare two cementing techniques in uniradicular teeth with root weakened walls.Methods: An in vitro experimental study was done with sixty collected teeth which were divided into three groups at random (A, B and C). The conventional technique with resin cement was done in 20 teeth with narrow canals 20 other teeth with weakened root walls (groups A and B). The technique of root reinforcement and flowable resin cement was used in the remaining 20 teeth (group C) which had weakened root walls. The dislodging force in the three groups was tested using an universal testing machine. The Mann Whitney and one-way ANOVA tests were used with a p value < 0.05 as statistically significant.Results: It was not found a statistically significant difference when comparing the dislodging force in the three groups (p = 0.064) but, it was found a difference when comparing traction forces (p = 0.005). In addition, it was observed that there was less adhesion between dentin - restorative interface materials in the three groups. The behavior exhibited between said post - cement poles showed higher adhesion with the resin cement.Conclusion: Group C showed greater resistance to the tensile force perhaps because the resistance of the tooth structure was increased when the root canal was reinforced with composite resine. The conventional technique was effective in the case of restoring teeth with narrow root canals. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-01-01 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-09-24T16:23:11Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-09-24T16:23:11Z |
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo revisado por pares |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
dc.type.drive.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.ustabuca.edu.co/index.php/USTASALUD_ODONTOLOGIA/article/view/1116 10.15332/us.v12i1.1116 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11634/36993 |
url |
http://revistas.ustabuca.edu.co/index.php/USTASALUD_ODONTOLOGIA/article/view/1116 http://hdl.handle.net/11634/36993 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15332/us.v12i1.1116 |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.ustabuca.edu.co/index.php/USTASALUD_ODONTOLOGIA/article/view/1116/915 |
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv |
Ustasalud; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2013); 55-62 |
dc.relation.citationissue.eng.fl_str_mv |
Ustasalud; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2013); 55-62 |
dc.relation.citationissue.none.fl_str_mv |
2590-7875 1692-5106 10.15332/us.v12i1 |
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2018 UstaSalud |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2018 UstaSalud http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Santo Tomás Seccional Bucaramanga |
institution |
Universidad Santo Tomás |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Universidad Santo Tomás |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
noreply@usta.edu.co |
_version_ |
1800786418976423936 |
spelling |
Celis Corzo, Juliana ElisaCáceres Marulanda, AdrianaCabrera Rojas, Juan CarlosDíaz Rodríguez, Jorge Guillermo2021-09-24T16:23:11Z2021-09-24T16:23:11Z2013-01-01http://revistas.ustabuca.edu.co/index.php/USTASALUD_ODONTOLOGIA/article/view/111610.15332/us.v12i1.1116http://hdl.handle.net/11634/36993Objective: To compare two cementing techniques in uniradicular teeth with root weakened walls.Methods: An in vitro experimental study was done with sixty collected teeth which were divided into three groups at random (A, B and C). The conventional technique with resin cement was done in 20 teeth with narrow canals 20 other teeth with weakened root walls (groups A and B). The technique of root reinforcement and flowable resin cement was used in the remaining 20 teeth (group C) which had weakened root walls. The dislodging force in the three groups was tested using an universal testing machine. The Mann Whitney and one-way ANOVA tests were used with a p value < 0.05 as statistically significant.Results: It was not found a statistically significant difference when comparing the dislodging force in the three groups (p = 0.064) but, it was found a difference when comparing traction forces (p = 0.005). In addition, it was observed that there was less adhesion between dentin - restorative interface materials in the three groups. The behavior exhibited between said post - cement poles showed higher adhesion with the resin cement.Conclusion: Group C showed greater resistance to the tensile force perhaps because the resistance of the tooth structure was increased when the root canal was reinforced with composite resine. The conventional technique was effective in the case of restoring teeth with narrow root canals.Objetivo: comparar dos técnicas de cementación de postes en fibra de vidrio en dientes con paredes radiculares debilitadas.Materiales y métodos: se realizó un estudio experimental In vitro. Se recolectaron 60 piezas dentales y se dividieron en tres grupos de manera aleatoria (A, B y C), se empleó la técnica convencional con cemento resinoso en 20 dientes con conductos angostos y en 20 dientes con paredes radiculares debilitados (grupos A y B). La técnica de refuerzo radicular con resina fluida y cemento resinoso se usó en los 20 dientes restantes (grupo C) que presentaban paredes radiculares debilitadas. Se evaluó la fuerza de desalojo a la tracción en los tres grupos mediante una Máquina Universal de Ensayos para medir la fuerza de desalojo a la tracción. Se utilizó el test de Mann Whitney y el ANOVA de una vía con un valor de p<0,05 como estadísticamente significativo.Resultados: no se encontró una diferencia estadísticamente significativa al comparar la resistencia al desalojo en los tres grupos (p=0,064) pero si se observó al analizar las fuerzas de tracción (p=0,005). Además, se evidenció que existe menor adhesión entre la interfase dentina-material restaurador en los tres grupos y que el comportamiento presentado entre poste-cemento indicó que los postes presentaron mayor adhesión con el cemento resinoso.Conclusión: el grupo C presentó mayor resistencia a la fuerza de tracción posiblemente, debido a que la resistencia de la estructura dental se incrementó cuando el canal radicular fue reforzado con resina compuesta. La técnica convencional fue efectiva en el caso de rehabilitar dientes con conductos radiculares angostos.[Celis JE, Cáceres A, Cabrera JC, Díaz JG. Comparación de la resistencia al desalojo de postes prefabricados en dientes uniradiculares: un estudio In vitro. Ustasalud 2013; 12: 55 - 62]application/pdfspaUniversidad Santo Tomás Seccional Bucaramangahttp://revistas.ustabuca.edu.co/index.php/USTASALUD_ODONTOLOGIA/article/view/1116/915Ustasalud; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2013); 55-62Ustasalud; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2013); 55-622590-78751692-510610.15332/us.v12i1Derechos de autor 2018 UstaSaludhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2COMPARACIÓN DE LA RESISTENCIA AL DESALOJO DE POSTES PREFABRICADOS EN DIENTES UNIRADICULARES: UN ESTUDIO IN VITROCOMPARISON OF RESISTANCE IN PRECAST POST EVICTION UNIRADICULAR TEETH: AN IN VITRO STUDYArtículo revisado por paresinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb111634/36993oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/369932023-07-14 16:23:07.449metadata only accessRepositorio Universidad Santo Tomásnoreply@usta.edu.co |