Comparación de la regresión GINI con la regresión de mínimos cuadrados ordinarios y otros modelos de regresión lineal robustos
In this paper compares Gini regression (using the non-parametric approach of weighted average of slope, instead of the parametric approach) with OLS and other robust regression methods, the type L (LAV, linear combinations of order statistics), the type M (M Huber, based on the concept of maximum li...
- Autores:
-
Correa Morales, Juan Carlos
Florez, Gloria Patricia Carmona
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2015
- Institución:
- Universidad Santo Tomás
- Repositorio:
- Universidad Santo Tomás
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/39595
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/estadistica/article/view/1186
http://hdl.handle.net/11634/39595
- Palabra clave:
- Datos atípicos
eficiencia
míminos cuadrados ordinarios
modelos de regresión robustos
regresión Gini
robustez.
- Rights
- License
- http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Summary: | In this paper compares Gini regression (using the non-parametric approach of weighted average of slope, instead of the parametric approach) with OLS and other robust regression methods, the type L (LAV, linear combinations of order statistics), the type M (M Huber, based on the concept of maximum likelihood) and the type MM (based on the minimization of an estimator M). The comparison of the methods is performed via simulation under different scenarios. The results show that the Gini regression has a higher degree of robustness compared with the OLS regression to estimate the regression coefficients in the presence of outliers, but their robustness is less than robust estimation methods LAV, M Huber and MM. |
---|